It’s in the Quran

Dajjal adds a comment to the NCCR blog cross-post “The Threat of Islam” by Martha Vanderpol. Ms. Vanderpol effectively explains what Islam is doing to Western Europe. Dajjal’s comment explains that a good Muslim is a violent Muslim because it is encoded in Islam’s considered holiest book known to us as the Quran. Next to the Quran in reverence is the Hadith which are from man rather than Allah. Hadith are broken down into degrees of reliability or authenticity. Sunnis represent about 90% of all Muslims and Shias roughly about 10%. As expected Sunnis and Shias do not agree with each other on what is a reliable Hadith. Since Dajjal’s expose on Islam uses a Sunni reliable Hadith Let’s narrow down the Sunni expectations.

Just to be clear the Quran is so holy to Muslims because it is considered the uncreated words of Allah delivered through the lips of Islam’s considered perfect man Mohammed. With all this divine and perfect association you MUST understand that Islam is NOT a religion of peace regardless of the propaganda you read or hear from the media and Muslim apologists.

At any rate Sunnis divide Hadith reliability into Sound (Sahih), Good (Hasan), Weak (Da’if) and Fabricated (Maudu). For Sunnis a Hadith follows certain rules to the crossed “t” and the dotted “i” then you had pay attention almost like it came from Allah although it may not have. Here are those rules:

1. Each of its narrators is of good character,

2. Each of its narrators has a precise memory,

3. The isnad (chain of narrators) is uninterrupted from the beginning to end,

4. The hadith is sound and free of any shudhudh (irregularity) in its isnad or matn (text), and

5. The hadith is sound and free of any ‘illah (fault) in its isnad or text (What Is “Hadith Sahih” and “Isnad Sahih”; from OnIslam.net; a pro-Islam site)

Dajjal quotes from Sahih Muslim which from what I have read is second only to Sahih Bukhari which is of course surpassed by the so-called uncreated words of Allah delivered through the lips of Mohammed.

The below title and subheading was constructed from the Editor.

JRH 1/12/15

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

************************

It’s in the Quran

Islam: Moderate or Radical Irrelevant

By Dajjal

January 4, 2015 1:03 AM

Comment to ‘The Threat of Islam’

Radical, radicalization & Islamism are false memes. The mission of Islam is the personal emolument of its founder and his successors. It is an Arab war crime syndicate gone global.

Islam is incapable of reform; it was created to enrich its founder through the professional practice of plunder & extortion. Global imposition of Allah’s will is a pretext, not a purpose; part of Moe’s clever marketing scheme.

Islam is a real, proximate and continuing threat. It is persistent because each generation of Muslims is confronted with the threat of Hellfire if they hold back and promise of eternity in Allah’s celestial bordello if they wage offensive warfare to conquer the world.

It ain’t about radicalism; it’s about belief. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause. When MINOs [Blog Editor: Muslims in Name Only] get [an] Imam and believe, they go to war. That is Islam, not radicalization.

If the masses were aware of the fundamental facts, they would be with Robert Gentle, clogging the streets echoing demands for nuking every Islamic nation.

I will now display to you something others will not reveal: an excerpt from Sahih Muslim 19.4294 [Blog Editor: For the Islam challenged it’s from a Hadith]:

… When you meet your enemies who are polytheists invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. Then invite them to migrate from their lands to the land of Muhajirs and inform them that, if they do so, they shall have all the privileges and obligations of the Muhajirs. If they refuse to migrate, tell them that they will have the status of Bedouin Muslims and will be subjected to the Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the spoils of war or Fai’ except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them …

Muslims threaten, if the victims succumb, they are recruited to victimize others. If not, they are attacked. After the conquest, they are enslaved, dhimmified or convert to Islam, in which case they are recruited to victimize others. Islam is vampirism: stake it!!!

______________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed in brackets are by the Editor.

© Dajjal

Blog Editor for further learning check out below links:

http://www.crusadersarmory.tk/ (Crusader’s Amory – Copious Expose Islam site)

http://www.quran-islam.org/articles/hadith_not_from_prophet_ (P1177).html (Pro-Islam info)

http://welcometoshiaislam.blogspot.com/2013/03/shia-books-of-hadith-ahaadith-narrations.html (Pro-Shia info)

http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Hadith/Ulum/asb7.html (Pro-Islam on Hadith Classifications)

http://www.theonlyquran.com/hadith/Sahih-Muslim (Pro-Islam on Sahih Muslim Hadith [Hadis, Hadiths, Ahadith or whatever])

A Good Muslim or None So Blind

The essay below is as much a response the Muslim apologist writer Scott Broden praising the Supreme Court deciding for a Radical Muslim Mosque in Rutherford County Tennessee as it is an expose on the Muslim stealth jihad that occurs in America. The Wonkette blog lays the effect of the Supreme Court decision in less eloquent terms yet very accurate compared to the above Tennessean press coverage link by the same Scott Broden of whom Justin pokes a jab at pertaining a Broden piece in DNJ.

JRH 6/8/14

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

*************************

A Good Muslim or None So Blind

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 6/7/2014 11:19 PM

The American people do not object to the Muslims or their worship of Allah, until the ideology of their "religion" contravenes the individual liberties provided by the U.S. Constitution and infringes upon our Constitutional Rights, in the manner that 75% of the Hadith and Sira does, as applied under Sharia law; and, despite Scott Broden's assertions in 'Freedom of Religion...' (Daily News Journal 6-5-14), the opponents to the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro (ICM) are not the first to state that Islam seeks "to establish Sharia law as the new code of conduct here. “Islamists and their imams are often heard saying, "Islam will reign supreme in America."

"We will implement the rule of God on earth by the tip of the sword." These are the words of the American-born Anwar al-Awlaqi, from Los Cruces, New Mexico, who became a top Al Qaeda leader.

In February 2011, the Islamic Thinkers Society, based in New York, planned to have Islamofascist Anjem Choudary (Chourday) speak at their protest rally. Choudary (Chourday) told the 'Daily Star' newspaper, days before the event, that "the event is a rally, a call for the Muslims to rise up and establish the Islamic state in America."

Today, there remains significantly so much more at stake in Murfreesboro, TN and across America than many people realize or understand, and the failed public notice policy, the completion of the ICM expansion and the disservice to the American people committed by the U.S. Supreme Court, in this instance, bode ill moving ahead. Propagandists and apologists for Islam, such as Broden, and Islam's enablers, like the Rutherford County Commission, would have us believe that Islam and its mosques are benign, innocent and peaceful, when all the evidence is to the contrary.

Peaceful? The ICM had board member Mossad (Mosaad) Rawash proclaiming the joy of dying as a martyr for Jihad [Blog Editor: I couldn’t confirm this but HERE is Rawash’s support for violence in the name of Islam]; and, in January 2009, the community witnessed an ICM protest in support of Hamas, as thousands of Hamas mortars and missiles rained down on Israel. We all heard their battle cry of Jihad, "Allahu Akbar", rising up in the streets. As this congregation grows in membership, so too will its propensity towards violent measures against non-Muslims, as commanded by the Koran and the Hadith.

"If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizyah (tax). If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them..." (Hadith #1731).

"What moved me to do what I did was purely my faith. I was motivated by the law that commands me to cut off the head of anyone who insults Allah and his Prophet." This was the explanation Mohammed Bouyeri gave the court for stabbing Dutch film maker Theo Van Gogh to death, while holding a Koran.

Compounding the problem, the Obama administration and DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson unilaterally “relaxed" immigration "rules" for people with "loose terrorist associations" in February 2014. This enabled scores of highly trained Muslim terrorists posing as "refugees" from Iraq and Syria to enter the U.S. once more (155,000 combined total in 2013), after thousands of Syrians fraudulently entered in August 2013; ABC News confirmed this in November 2013.

The Center for Immigration Studies report from 2012 states that the U.S. refugee program "is increasingly bringing in groups that have stated openly they do not intend to assimilate into American culture." More than misplaced sympathy, it is self-destructive and sheer stupidity to bring population groups linked to terror into America, and it all too often leads directly to terrorist attacks on our soil (take note Mr. Broden).

Muslims take advantage of American kindness, gullibility and compassion. When the time comes, they will attack us more terribly than they did on 9/11, the Islamic way. They say one thing on camera - "Islam is the religion of peace", and they teach something different to their children - Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead the infidels wherever you find them." This is well documented by Arabic speaking journalists, such as Laura Mansfield (WND April 2005).

Since 9/11, no suicide bombings have been successfully conducted by islamofascists in the United States (Tsarnaevs not considered in this category), but six cases involved Muslims explicitly seeking to conduct Al Qaeda-type "martyrdom operations". In Zachary Karabatak's case, he had overstayed his visitor's visa, and he was plotting to detonate bombs at military installations in Virginia and the Capitol Building in DC, declaring his intentions to collapse the entire dome in January 2012. And this is just one of fifteen other major terror plots during the same time frame.

[Blog Editor - 8/16/14: Commenter "Zac" points out a correction needs to be made to who overstayed their visitor's visa. Zachary Karabatak was the source of Justin's info and Sidi Mohamed Amine El Khalifi is the Islamic terrorist with the expired visa who had planned acts of terrorism in Virginia and the Capitol Building in DC". The actual source for this correction is this pdf document: http://politicalscience.osu.edu/faculty/jmueller/50CAPB7.pdf under "Case 50: Capitol Bomber" dated March 14, 2014 - scroll down the document to discover Zachary Karabatak is the author of said info.]

In 1992, Imam Zaid Shakir, one of the founders of Zaytuna - America's first Muslim college, preached that a new Caliphate (an Islamic state ruling the world by Sharia) should be created that will wage jihad and "use ...weaponry against the enemies of Islam," during his sermon, titled 'Failure of the Muslim Political Order'. Continuing on to 2013, Shakir told 32,000 Muslims attending an Islamic Circle of North America convention in Maryland, that "If Islam is the basis, the kafir (nonbeliever)...the Christian...the Jew will be dhimmi (second-class citizen). They won't be equal with the Muslim."

On January 26, 2013 in Falls Church, Virginia, Shaker Elsaed (Elsayed), a well-known Islamic leader, spoke to an audience at T C Williams High School and stated: "The enemies of Allah are lining up...are we lining (up) or are we afraid because they may call us terrorists?...Make this title (terrorist) worth it, and be a good Muslim." Evidently Elsaed believes a good Muslim is a terrorist Muslim.

It is not fear that motivates many opponents to the spread of Islam and Sharia law within America. We simply understand the threat of Islam, much as farm kids understand the threat of a rabid dog. We have seen what Islam does globally - we have seen what Islam does here. Judging purely on its scripture, to say nothing of the way it is preached in the mosques and actually practiced, Islam is the most vicious sectarian of all "religions" in its heartlessness towards nonbelievers. We contend that Islam is the problem.

Many people deny the existential threat within Islam's foundational texts, or they attempt to recast Islam to fit their perceived vision of Islam or their own political agenda. None are so blind as those who cannot see, that Islam and the Koran sanctify terrorism and many types of human rights violations, in order to distinguish them from mere criminal behavior, in the Muslim mind - that Mohammed's lifetime example of theft, rape and murder and pedophilia has nurtured the Islamofascist worldview, and that it is Mohammed's final commands from his death bed (Koran Chapter 9) that continually inspire so many jihadists to wage their Holy War against nonbelievers

By Justin O. Smith

________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

The source links within Justin’s essay are from the Editor. Muslim words and names often have multiple English language spelling, I don’t know why but I contributed a few alternate spelling in parentheses. Anything enclosed by brackets is from the Editor.

© Justin O. Smith

Jizya Resurgence

John R. Houk

© July 8, 2011

Do you know what jizya is? Jizya is the name that Muslims use to extort money from non-Muslims (kafir) living under the political authority of a Muslim State. The jizya-poll tax is justified as protection money that the non-believing Muslim will be free from harm from other Muslims. Of course there is also a catch to the protection money. The kafir living in Muslim lands is also called a dhimmi. The dhimmi must pay jizya for protection; however if the dhimmi prays in public, acts in any many defined as insulting to a Muslim, if a dhimmi builds a Church, if a dhimmi attempts to marry a Muslim and does not convert then a crime has been committed and on and on and on. The point is the life a dhimmi in a Muslim nation is worse than what Black South Africans endured during White enforced Apartheid.

Now a Muslim apologist will tell a Westerner especially an American that jizya has not been enforced for years and years. Most Muslim nations indeed officially ended the imposition of jizya by the late 19^th and early 20^th century; however the spirit of jizya has not ended for the dhimmis in Muslim lands. Marks of humiliation are still exacted in Muslim nations to this very day. If the humiliation is not government sanctioned the government looks away as Muslim clerics lead Muslim mobs to acts of violence and destruction against the dhimmi (primarily Christians) according to the Islamic rules of jizya and dhimmitude.

The practice of jizya’s unofficial enforcement was less for protection and more to bring wealth to conquering Muslim Caliphs. The conquered Christian and Hindu areas of the world was the majority population. Once oppressive measures of dhimmitude took its toll on the Christian faithful, the jizya began to bring less revenue as more converted to Islam to escape the cruelty of dhimmitude.  

With a resurgence of Islamic purity sweeping the Muslim world which is quickly ending the Muslim apologist claim that Islamism is an aberrant practice compared to the majority of moderate Muslim, there is a clamor for the return of jizya and government sanctioned enforcement of dhimmitude as official policy in Muslim nations. The Egyptian government which is slowly becoming dominated by the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood is publicly talking of the return of official jizya for that nation’s rather large Coptic Christian population.

Raymond Ibrahim writes about Egyptian talk of returning the jizya on Coptic Christians.

JRH 7/8/11