THIS SHOULD BE A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS: Cognitive deficiency & Mind-free Document Signing
John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© March 8, 2025
I just read a substantial amount of Official Presidential Documents were signed by an autopen rather than pen-in-hand Dementia Joe. This has to include Bills passed by Congress, Executive Orders, Memos and GASP… (criminal) Pardons.
WE THE PEOPLE should be asking if the old autopen was used because installed President Biden did not have a clue of the Documents. Which would mean SOMEONE ELSE was directing the autopen to run the U.S. Government while Dementia Joe was a figurehead puppet.
This revelation should place into question every single Executive Action implemented from an AUTOPEN!
Below are a couple of news stories on autopen signing I pray the Trump DOJ can use to openly nullify Biden lawlessness. AND if a Constitutional confrontation ensues, I pray that SCOTUS is more mindful of actual constitutionality than the probable legal chaos that follows cancelling a mindless President that puppet stringed by an unelected Leftist Oligarchy.
JRH 3/8/25
READER SUPPORTED!
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL - one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com
>>DRINK COFFEE-MANAGE WEIGHT or MAKE SOME EXTRA CASH<<
******************************
Autopen-Gate: The Device That Signed America Away Under Biden’s Watch!
.jpg)
Biden (Finish The Race Photo)
March 8, 2025
Recent revelations indicate that President Joe Biden extensively utilized an autopen device to affix his signature to official documents, prompting inquiries into the authenticity of his endorsements and the actual exercise of presidential authority.
LOOKING AT HIS SIGNATURES, WHAT WE SAW WAS IT APPEARS THERE ARE A LOT OF DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD HAVE A WET SIGNATURE, IT LOOKS AS THOUGH THEY HAVE AN AUTOPEN. Samuel Dewey discusses whether an autopen was used without Biden knowing. “It is potentially criminal.” @stinchfield1776 pic.twitter.com/5GyF1kPKn1
— Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) March 8, 2025
The autopen, a machine designed to replicate an individual’s signature, has been employed by various public figures to manage high volumes of correspondence. Its use by U.S. presidents dates back several administrations, serving as a tool to efficiently handle the multitude of documents requiring the president’s signature. However, the extent of its use has varied, and concerns arise when it becomes a substitute for personal endorsement on critical legislative and executive actions.
Autopen vs Real Pen (Finish The Race Photo)
Autopen Was Running the Country During Biden Years “Whoever controlled the autopen. controlled the presidency.’ Missouri AG Andrew Bailey asked the DOJ to investigate whether Biden’s cognitive mental decline allowed unelected officials to make decisions without his knowledge or approval.
In May 2024, President Biden authorized the use of an autopen to sign a one-week extension for federal aviation programs while he was in San Francisco, aiming to prevent any lapse in Federal Aviation Administration operations during congressional deliberations on a more comprehensive funding bill. This incident exemplifies the administration’s reliance on the autopen for timely enactment of legislation, especially when the president is physically unavailable to provide a handwritten signature.
The House Oversight Project’s recent findings suggest that the Biden administration’s use of the autopen was not limited to occasional instances but was a standard practice for signing official documents. This extensive use raises concerns about the authenticity of presidential endorsements and the potential implications for the constitutional requirement that the president personally sign bills into law.
Critics argue that the pervasive use of the autopen undermines the integrity of the presidential office and raises questions about who is truly exercising executive authority. The reliance on a machine to replicate the president’s signature could be perceived as a delegation of a fundamental presidential responsibility, potentially diminishing the accountability associated with the act of signing legislation.
Historically, the use of autopen by U.S. presidents has been a subject of debate. While it offers a practical solution for managing the voluminous paperwork associated with the presidency, its use for signing significant legislative measures has been contentious. For instance, President Barack Obama’s use of the autopen to sign an extension of the Patriot Act while he was abroad sparked discussions about the constitutional validity of such actions.
The implications of President Biden’s extensive use of the autopen extend beyond procedural concerns. They touch upon the broader issue of transparency and trust in government. Citizens expect that their elected leaders are directly involved in critical decisions, and the perception that a machine is executing presidential duties can erode public confidence.
Furthermore, the authenticity of documents bearing the president’s signature holds legal significance. While the Department of Justice under President George W. Bush issued an opinion affirming the constitutionality of autopen use for signing bills into law, this perspective has not been universally accepted and remains untested in the courts.
In light of these revelations, it is imperative to re-examine the protocols surrounding the use of autopen devices in the executive branch. Establishing clear guidelines that delineate the appropriate circumstances for autopen use, ensuring that it does not replace the president’s direct involvement in critical legislative processes, is essential for maintaining the integrity of the office.
The discourse surrounding President Biden’s use of the autopen underscores the need for a balance between administrative efficiency and the preservation of constitutional principles. As technology continues to evolve, so too must our frameworks for accountability and authenticity in governance.
Eric Thompson: Conservative independent talk show host and owner of https://FinishTheRace. USMC Veteran fighting daily to preserve Faith - Family - Country values in the United States of America.
Finish The Race HOMEPAGE
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Could a Bombshell Discovery Render All of Biden's Presidential Actions 'Null and Void'?
.jpg)
Biden - Mandel Ngan/Pool via AP (PJ Media Photo)
March 6, 2025 3:31 PM
The Biden presidency might have been the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the American people. A shocking investigation by the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project has revealed that virtually every document bearing Joe Biden's signature during his presidency was signed by an autopen — except for one.
What makes this revelation particularly damning is that the only document confirmed to have Biden's actual signature was his letter announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race. Let that sink in for a moment.
Remember when House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) revealed his discussion with Biden when Biden couldn't recall signing the executive order halting LNG exports? Now we know why — he probably didn't. The real question is: Who did? Who was running the country while Biden was not all there?
🚨WHOEVER CONTROLLED THE AUTOPEN CONTROLLED THE PRESIDENCY🚨
— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) March 6, 2025
We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency.
All used the same autopen signature except for the the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the… https://t.co/CC3oJUkNr4 pic.twitter.com/mtNrZsALDu
The use of the presidential autopen dates back to the 1950s, and there's been much debate about its legality. In 2013, Barack Obama became the first president to sign a bill into law using an autopen. He was vacationing in Hawaii at the time. His office relied on a 30-page memo from President George W. Bush's legal team asserting that the president's presence was not required as long as said president had authorized the signature.
What's not clear, in the case of Biden, is who was running the autopen and whether Biden was aware it was happening.
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is demanding that the Department of Justice investigate whether Biden's obvious cognitive decline allowed unelected bureaucrats to essentially run the government without presidential oversight. If this is true — and let's be honest, all signs point to yes — every executive order, every pardon, and every official action taken under Biden's name could be constitutionally void.
Bailey's letter to Michael E. Horowitz, the inspector general of the Department of Justice, spells it out perfectly.
I write to request that you conduct a full investigation into President Biden's mental capacity in his final days in office. By now, Biden's mental decline is famous. Under the 25th Amendment, his inability to make decisions should have meant a succession of power. Instead, it appears staffers and officers in the Biden administration may have exploited Biden's incapacity so they could issue orders without an accountable President of sound mind approving them. That would explain why the Biden administration's orders were aggressively much farther to the left than any previous President. If in fact Biden's staffers were exploiting his mental decline, those orders are null and void.
The evidence is overwhelming. We know that Biden's handlers desperately tried to prevent anyone from meeting with him one-on-one. Even Democratic insiders admit the truth. DNC fundraiser Lindy Li recently spilled the beans and acknowledged that Biden wasn't running the show; his staff, his wife, and Hunter were.
Thanks to the Heritage Foundation's investigation, we now have proof that Biden's signature was automated throughout his presidency — which raises serious questions about whether he was aware of what was being signed in his name at all. The Oversight Project rightfully points out that since Biden revoked Trump's executive privilege, we can easily determine who controlled the autopen and what safeguards, if any, were in place.
The implications are staggering. We essentially had a presidency by proxy, with unelected staffers wielding presidential power while the man himself was barely cognizant enough to read a teleprompter. This isn't just a scandal; it's potentially the biggest constitutional crisis in American history.
The American people deserve to know who was really calling the shots during the Biden administration. If these allegations prove true, every single action taken under Biden's name needs to be scrutinized and potentially nullified. The truth must come out, and those responsible must be held accountable.
Do you think the mainstream media will cover this explosive autopen scandal? Don't count on it, but PJ Media won't back down from exposing the truth about who was really running the Biden White House.
Matt Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trump, the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama, and The Scandalous Presidency of Barack Obama.
Copyright PJMedia.com/Salem Media. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment