John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© March 25, 2023
A few decades ago if someone asked, “Where were you when President John Kennedy was assassinate?” The implication being you were alive when the incident occurred. A few decades almost anybody asked that question indeed remembered. The thing is November 22, 1963 is about 61 years ago. Chances are today most people you ask about the Kennedy assassination would reply, “When was that?”
Today, I am in my 68th year of existence. I was born November 20, 1956. When Kennedy was assassinated on 11/22/63 it was two days after my seventh birthday. I remember the assassination through the lens of my childhood. I actually witnessed the incident on live TV at home because I was at home missing school with a sickness which I do not recall. It could not have been a severe sickness because I was sitting on the couch watching our new color TV while (then I thought at age 7 annoyingly) news coverage was showing the open-air Kennedy motorcade going down a street in Dallas Texas. Then I recall the chaos. Then details of my seven year old memory allude me.
WELL… I got that bit of nostalgia off my chest.
AND SO, I ran into an interesting post from the Substack page of Dr. Robert Malone where he shares the mythical open Prosecution statement of Lyndon Baines Johnson (Kennedy’s successor for those too young to remember or care to know) for being involved in President Kennedy’s assassination. Dr. Malone posted it at “the request” of the mythical opening statement’s author.
The fascinating thing is the mythical prosecution includes facts from the recently released JFK Files (with an anticipation of more files in the future). ALSO I am aware that Roger Stone (a Nixon supporter and apparent confidant) believes President LBJ was in on President Kennedy’s assassination. And as such, yesterday (3/24/25) Stone shared some Nixon reminiscences they had about the Kennedy assassination in which they point a stern finger at LBJ. I’m cross posting that as well. Stone’s title: “Nightmare On Elm Street: JFK and the Assassination That Still Haunts America”.
That will make this post a lengthy read. If you have attention span issues, you should at least read the Dr. Malone piece entitled, “Trial Of Lyndon B. Johnson for Assassination of his President”.
I’m not going to cross post it but if you are a JFK assassination amateur sleuth, you will be interested in Jerome Corsi’s Substack post looking into the medical science examination of the Kennedy assassination that Corsi believes eliminates the lone gunmen assertions of the Warren Commission. The title: “The Truth About the #JFK Assassination: The Medical Cover-Up”.
JRH 3/25/25
READER SUPPORTED!
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL - one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com
>>DRINK HAPPY-HEALTHY COFFEE<<
************************
Trial Of Lyndon B. Johnson for Assassination of his President
Guest editorial by David Marks
Posted by Robert W Malone MD, MS
March 24, 2025
LBJ Sworn In as President After JFK Assassination (Malone News Photo)
Opening Statement For The Prosecution
The Trial Of Lyndon B. Johnson
by David Marks
republished by Malone.News at the request of the author
On November 22nd, 1963, the actions and orders of the defendant in this matter, Lyndon B. Johnson, culminated in the assassination of John F. Kennedy, ensuring Johnson would become the President of the United States.
We are confident you will return a guilty verdict at the conclusion of this historic case after you have heard all of the evidence.
Vice President Johnson’s motives could not be any more apparent. He had been sidelined by John Kennedy and humiliated by his brother and Attorney General, Robert Kennedy. About to be ejected from the administration because of previous nefarious activities, including larceny and murder, Johnson knew his presidential aspirations were about to be crushed. His political career was doomed as he faced probable jail time.
The death of his nemesis meant he would immediately attain the highest office in the land. Johnson knew that with his ascent to the presidency, all ongoing investigations revealing his corrupt activities would cease, both by Congress and the press. Indeed, the public execution of John F. Kennedy solved all of Johnson’s immediate problems.
We will make absolutely clear that Johnson not only had the motivation, means, and opportunity to organize this deadly crime but also demonstrate how he used his influence and immense power to ensure that no thorough investigation would ever reveal the truth. His insistence from the day of the murder that a lone crazed killer was responsible for shooting Kennedy, was the foundation for obfuscating his central role in the crime.
This fabricated cover story is far from the truth of what unfolded. You will see clearly that Johnson’s involvement was neither tangential nor theoretical. The prosecution will present a chronology demonstrating that Lyndon Johnson was the ringleader of a most despicable conspiracy.
The trial of Lyndon Johnson will uncover key relationships kept from scrutiny by most Americans for decades. When an initial attempt to eliminate the alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, failed, Johnson called on his co-conspirators in organized crime to kill him while in custody. There is undeniable evidence that Johnson had close relationships with top mob figures and also that he knew Oswald’s murderer personally.
When former President Nixon saw the news that Jack Ruby had killed Lee Harvey Oswald, he immediately recognized Ruby as a man who Lyndon Johnson had identified as a reliable asset within organized crime. In startling defiance of the falsified narrative about a loner who killed Kennedy, other witnesses had seen Ruby and Oswald together in the days prior to the assassination.
The prosecution will reveal details of the plot that clarify the actual roles of these two men.
Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey Oswald (Malone News Photo)
We will present incontrovertible proof that Johnson was in charge of every detail of the assassination and its cover-up. Oswald, after being shot by Ruby while in police custody, was bleeding internally and unconscious in a Dallas hospital. In a revelatory moment during the first days of his presidency, Johnson phoned the operating room demanding that the supervising physician extract a confession of guilt from the dying, alleged assassin. Within the context of his other actions, you must consider that the new President was relentless in his intervention, revealing a desperate effort to end any inquiry into the details of Kennedy’s murder.
Contradicting the facade erected by Johnson to distance himself and his collaborators from the assassination, the prosecution will shed a bright light on a cabal of disaffected U.S. government operatives and agencies, powerful members of organized crime, and corrupt businessmen who conspired along with him to kill the President and forever hide the truth.
The evidence of government collusion is overwhelming. Violations of Secret Service protocol on the day of the assassination are indicative of an omnipotent master manipulating events that allowed Kennedy to be killed.
Only one person was capable of initiating, leading, and stopping an investigation into the crime of the century.
Though he should be the most likely suspect, Lyndon Johnson ensured that a Presidential Panel he selected, dubbed the Warren Commission rather than the Johnson Commission, was the only body he allowed to investigate the crime. Compromised cronies were chosen and leveraged to create a massive cover-up, limiting the investigation within strict boundaries.
Most strikingly, the group included Allan Dulles, who Kennedy had fired as CIA director. Dulles considered Kennedy a despicable enemy and was Johnson’s most loyal ally in manipulating the outcome of the report which simply confirmed the guilt of a lone assassin. Dulles guaranteed the success of the true mandate of the commission — ensuring that the public never learned the truth.
The prosecution will demonstrate how anyone who might have provided first-hand observations or testimony leading to an uncontestable conclusion that a high-level conspiracy was responsible for Kennedy’s murder, was marginalized or defamed. A statistically impossible number of witnesses were eliminated under the pretense of a sudden deadly illness or suicide.
You will wonder how local or federal law enforcement could be compromised so deeply that they would tolerate the killing of a President and its consequences. We will expose how the Texas oil magnates and agricultural barons who supported Johnson had deep ties and control over the Dallas Police Department. The prosecution will also present details of the collaboration of Johnson and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover in quashing any inquiries that defied the Warren Commission. Additionally, accounts of CIA officers confirm a segment of the agency was directly involved in the murder.
In subsequent investigations over the next decades, including a Congressional inquiry, the executive branch feigned cooperation while continuing to limit any information that might implicate Johnson’s complicity in the killing of the President. In the months leading up to the hearings of the House Select Committee on Assassination in 1977, witnesses disappeared or died under overtly suspicious circumstances, including several organized crime informants who knew of Jack Ruby’s relationships and true motives and six high-level FBI executives with knowledge of Hoover’s participation in Johnson’s tremendous efforts to hide the details of the Director’s criminality.
We will demonstrate and explain how Johnson was central to both the murder and its concealment and reveal the methods and criminals involved. You will see how the Kennedy assassination fits into a pattern of Johnson’s machinations over decades, supported by criminal activities since he entered politics.
In this trial, you will find out that the most important pieces of physical and circumstantial evidence linking Johnson to the events of November 22nd, 1963, have been lost, minimized, or intentionally kept from the public.
Yet even with the continuing effort to deter from discovering the truth, there is sufficient evidence to convict Lyndon Johnson without any reasonable doubt.
We will show how the rifle that was allegedly used to shoot Kennedy had doubtful accuracy and was handled with an inept chain of custody. The ability of anyone to fire a minimum of four shots from the weapon has always been in doubt. The insistence that a single shooter had fired only three shots from the Dallas Book Depository came directly from the Johnson White House.
We will prove that one Malcolm Wallace had been Johnson’s hatchet man in deaths that furthered the political career of the ruthless Texas politician. Wallace had received government positions at Johnson’s behest despite being a convicted murderer who was represented by Johnson’s attorney. Some homicides that benefitted or protected Johnson have been directly tied to Wallace.
In what should have been the most revealing clue for investigators, the only latent fingerprint found on the 6th floor of the Dallas book depository claimed to be the sniper’s nest, belonged to Malcolm Wallace. This critical information has been ignored until this trial.
A key piece of evidence you will evaluate is the handling of the corpse of President Kennedy. The body was rapidly and illegally taken from Dallas without a proper autopsy. With guns drawn, the Secret Service removed the casket, bringing it to Air Force One. Johnson, knowing the importance of controlling what was revealed about the president’s wounds, had insisted the body accompany him to Washington.
An autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital was staged to confirm that the shots that killed President Kennedy came from the book depository. Non-medical, military authorities, demanded that pathologists conclude that the bullets entered from behind. Visual inspection of photos, first-hand witnesses, and the reports of doctors who attended him in Dallas, all confirm that the shot that killed JFK came from in front of him. Despite testimony and facts to the contrary, Johnson and his co-conspirators in Washington ensured that only shots from behind were considered by his commission and any contradictory information was deemed conspiracy theory.
Each release of law enforcement documentation from before, during, or after the events of November 22, 1963, confirms that anything supporting the truth of what occurred in Dallas has been destroyed and certainly never existed on paper. Every dump of JFK assassination records is a testament to this continuing repression, with the release of an unprecedented amount of unrelated material and bureaucratic correspondence.
As you process the huge amount of material condemning Johnson as the benefactor and engineer of this heinous crime, it is important to consider the horrific damage initiated by the JFK assassination. After his cold-hearted ascent to power, Johnson continued to ruthlessly cause unnecessary deaths and life-altering injuries sustained by hundreds of thousands in the Vietnam War, an outcome that the Kennedy administration would not have tolerated.
To keep you from considering the broad devastation caused by Johnson, the defense will continue to repeat the unsubstantiated false allegation of a lone assassin’s responsibility for the death of President Kennedy.
Despite the mountain of information and testimony confirming that co-conspirators in organized crime and the intelligence community were involved in the assassination and cover-up, Lee Harvey Oswald’s independent guilt is the bedrock of Johnson’s defense. Yet Oswald’s background and demeanor are not that of a disgruntled loner, but rather a sophisticated government asset, who given a brief opportunity to speak in detention, declared himself a patsy.
Although Oswald’s service in the Marine Corps, relationships with high-level intelligence controllers, and activities before the assassination directly contradict his depiction as a lone nut, government files released to date reflect the continued attempt to minimize and cloud his status as a key covert operative for the CIA.
The prosecution will demonstrate that Oswald was a patriot who did not fire the rifle found on the 6th floor of the Dallas Book Depository, but rather that he was manipulated into believing he was honorably protecting the president.
Lyndon Johnson’s defenders will embrace and apply his bold deflective tactics, denying any consideration of the obvious and limiting the boundaries of inquiry. They will ignore the prima facie evidence that Johnson was at the epicenter of the Kennedy assassination and distract from the immensity of effort that he applied to cover his guilt.
We ask you to recognize and reject this blatant, tired ruse in considering the facts. The plot to kill President Kennedy becomes ever more transparent as the benefactors of an assassination culture continue to thrive in an environment where threats, blackmail, and murder to attain personal wealth and power, are standard operating procedures.
Only a jury of honest open-eyed Americans can find Lyndon Johnson guilty of murdering John F. Kennedy. This verdict will give impetus to an era where unchecked criminal enterprise in the guise of ultra-nationalism and political necessity in defiance of all ethical boundaries are no longer tolerated.
^^^^^
This editorial opinion is based in part on newly released documents combined with previously available information, and was recently published on David Marks’ substack titled “Report from Planet Earth”, which can be found below. This has been republished at the request of the author.
© 2025 Robert W Malone, MD
Malone News HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Malone News
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nightmare On Elm Street: JFK and the Assassination That Still Haunts America
Powerful interests remain determined to keep the full truth about Kennedy's assassination from the American public.
By Roger Stone
March 24, 2025
JFK Assassination - Nixon-Johnson-CIA (SCT Photo)
Alcohol was an unpredictable elixir for Richard Nixon.
After several very dry martinis (which he proudly claimed Winston Churchill taught him to make), the former President could become talkative, quiet, or contemplative. During these moments, Nixon often drifted into memories of the past. As one of his closest confidants in his later years, I grew accustomed to these nightly sojourns.
One evening at his New Jersey home stands out clearly in my memory.
Nixon's 4-acre property in Saddle River sat hidden on a private wooded leafy lot—a perfect retreat where he wrote his books, hosted foreign dignitaries, and walked his dog, Brownie.
That night, he slouched in his leather armchair, right arm propped up, fingers wrapped around the stem of his martini glass. After a moment of silence, perhaps emboldened by the hour and the trust that had developed between us, I screwed up my confidence and asked the question that had haunted a generation: “Mr. President, who really killed Kennedy?”
He stared intently into his glass.
“Let me say this “he snorted “The Warren Commission was the biggest Goddamn hoax in American history.”
I was startled “I’m sorry, Sir- what do you mean,” I replied hoping for more.
"That was the difference between Lyndon and me,” Nixon said suddenly. "I wasn't willing to kill for it…”
He fell silent. I waited. Then he continued, speaking about Jack Ruby, the man who killed President Kennedy's assassin.
“I actually knew Ruby. Murray Chotiner introduced him back in '47. He went by Rubenstein then. An informant. Murray said he was one of Lyndon's people... We put him on the payroll at Lyndon’s request.”
Chotiner, the political mastermind behind Nixon's meteoric rise from being leaving the Navy in 1946 to Vice President of the United States in just six years had been a mob lawyer representing LA Mob Boss Mickey Cohen before venturing into politics.
The Kennedy assassination haunted Nixon. He believed that elements within intelligence agencies, organized crime, and the highest reaches of our government had conspired in Kennedy's death. Above all, he believed that Lee Harvey Oswald was an unwitting simpleton who was swept away in an exorable tide of nefarious activity, in short a “patsy.”
White House Domestic Policy Chief John Ehrlichman wrote that when he served as the White House Legal Counsel, Nixon ordered him to request that the CIA hand over all documents pertaining to John Kennedy’s murder. Nixon was furious when Richard Helms, the CIA Director, refused his presidential order to hand them over.
Nixon knew the plot to kill JFK went well beyond Lyndon Johnson A stunning, long-overlooked Nixon Watergate-era tape shows Richard Nixon warning CIA Director Richard Helms that he knows of CIA involvement in the murder of John F. Kennedy- “I know who shot John.” [H]e blurted out to the CIA Director. This stunning new Watergate-era tape captures an increasingly besieged Nixon desperately seeking to mobilize the CIA in his defense by threatening to expose their greatest secrets.
Nixon Threatened to Reveal the CIA's Involvement in the Kennedy Assassination
After Nixon’s revelations, I began investigating the assassination, publishing my findings in The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ to national acclaim in 2013. Despite numerous document releases over six decades, the most recent this past week, the complete truth about Kennedy's death remains obscured, with critical questions still unanswered.
The Questionable Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald
Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged lone gunman at the center of the Kennedy assassination narrative, famously proclaimed to the media he was a “patsy.” According to the Warren Commission report, Oswald fired three shots from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, with the second and third striking Kennedy. Even this basic yet essential finding is problematic.
One of the most striking omissions in the official record concerns a critical piece of forensic evidence: the paraffin test conducted on Oswald after his arrest. The Dallas Police Department examination revealed that Oswald had no powder burns on his chest, arms, or hands, and a paraffin test revealed that no nitrates (contained in the powders in gases when a weapon is fired) were found on Oswald’s cheek. These findings directly contradict the official narrative that Oswald fired a rifle multiple times that day. The absence of powder residue strongly suggests that Oswald may not have fired a weapon at all on November 22, 1963.
This crucial piece of exculpatory evidence was quickly dismissed by the Warren Commission, which relied instead on circumstantial evidence and questionable witness testimony to build its case against Oswald. The Commission's willingness to overlook such fundamental inconsistencies raises serious questions about the integrity of the entire investigation.
Further compounding these issues is the weapon itself. The Warren Commission alleged that Oswald used a $26 WWII-vintage Italian Mannlicher-Carcano carbine to carry out the assassination. Deputy Constable Seymour Weitzman and Deputy Sheriff Eugene Boone, both with vast knowledge of firearms, found the weapon on the sixth floor and claimed it was a Mauser, a German rifle, with Weitzman reiterating this in an official affidavit. Deputy Dallas Sheriff Roger Craig, also present on the scene, reaffirmed the discovery of a Mauser and noted a ‘7.65’ Mauser’ stamp on the barrel of the weapon. The problem with this discovery was that Oswald did not own a Mauser.
Even if Oswald had used an inferior Italian rifle, experts question whether Oswald could have fired the Mannlicher-Carcano effectively, given its reputation for inaccuracy and the tight timeframe of 5.6 seconds for three shots. When the Warren Commission had three Master marksmen recreate the shooting, only one managed the timing, and none hit the head or neck of a stationary target.
Yet we're asked to accept Oswald as the lone gunman—a man who once discharged a loaded pistol in Marine barracks, scored poorly on his final rifle test, couldn't drive, and lost his previous job for incompetence before working at the Texas School Book Depository.
The latest document dump this week contains one illuminating nugget of truth. The Russian security service KGB also determined Oswald was a “poor shot” during his time in the Soviet Union.
Oswald's Demeanor
Oswald left the alleged sniper’s nest seemingly unhurried and unbothered.
Only a minute after the shooting, Oswald was encountered by Dallas police officer Marrion L. Baker and Texas School Book Depository Superintendent Roy Truly in the second-floor lunchroom—four floors below. Both men testified that Oswald appeared calm, collected, and neither out of breath nor agitated.
As Truly testified to the Warren Commission: “He didn't seem to be excited or overly afraid or anything. He might have been startled, like I might have been if somebody confronted me. But I cannot recall any change in expression of any kind on his face…”
Officer Baker similarly reported that Oswald "appeared normal" and was "calm and collected." This behavior seems wholly inconsistent with someone who had just assassinated the President of the United States and fled down four flights of stairs in a matter of seconds.
Clerical supervisor Mrs. Robert Reid, who saw Oswald walking through her second-floor office moments later, described him as "just calm" and "moving at a very slow pace." Mrs. Reid emphasized that this was consistent with Oswald’s everyday demeanor.
These firsthand witness accounts directly contradict what one would expect from an assassin making his escape. The recently released documents fail to address these fundamental inconsistencies, leaving researchers to question why the official investigation so readily dismissed them.
Oswald as an Intelligence Asset
Perhaps the most compelling evidence undermining the lone gunman theory lies in Oswald's connections to U.S. intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA. Far from being a disaffected loner, Oswald appears to have been a carefully cultivated intelligence asset with connections to high-level operatives.
Jane Roman, a retired CIA officer who signed many of the agency's documents concerning Oswald prior to the assassination, admitted in an interview with researcher Jefferson Morley and former U.S. Army Intelligence officer John Newman that the CIA had a "keen interest in Oswald held very closely on the need-to-know basis."
When confronted with evidence that she had signed off on documents that misrepresented the CIA's knowledge of Oswald, Roman acknowledged, “I'm signing off on something that I know isn't true.” She further stated that this suggested “they [meaning the people with final authority over CIA communications] thought that somehow...they could make some use of Oswald.”
This frank admission from a CIA insider strongly indicates that Oswald was being monitored and potentially manipulated by intelligence agencies in the months leading up to the assassination. Yet the full extent of these connections remains unknown.
One connection we have discovered is George de Mohrenschildt, an enigmatic "oil geologist" with extensive ties to both the CIA and the Texas oil industry. From October 1962 until April 1963, de Mohrenschildt became a close friend to Lee and Marina Oswald, watching over them during a critical period.
De Mohrenschildt later admitted that his contact with Oswald was initiated at the suggestion of Dallas CIA man J. Walton Moore. This revelation directly contradicts the CIA's official position that Oswald was of no interest to the agency.
In the months before his mysterious death in 1977, de Mohrenschildt's story changed dramatically. In conversations with Dutch journalist Willem Oltmans, he made the shocking claim: "I feel responsible for the behavior of Lee Harvey Oswald....Because I guided him. I instructed him to set it up."
During his final trip to Europe with Oltmans, de Mohrenschildt reportedly "began providing fragments of a scenario in which Texas oilmen in league with intelligence operatives plotted to kill the president." Shortly after returning to the United States, de Mohrenschildt was found dead of a gunshot wound, just hours after intimating to investigators that the CIA had approved his contact with Oswald.
Despite the obvious significance of de Mohrenschildt's role, the full details of his relationship with Oswald and his connections to the CIA remain heavily obscured in government documents.
Poppy
Adding another layer to this web of connections is George de Mohrenschildt's relationship with George H.W. Bush, who would later become CIA Director and ultimately President of the United States. In 1950, de Mohrenschildt had started an oil investment firm with Eddie Hooker, Bush's roommate at Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts—establishing an indirect but significant link between Bush's circle and the man who would later become Oswald's handler.
More directly, in September 1976, as investigations into Kennedy's death were being reopened, a desperate de Mohrenschildt wrote to Bush, then Director of the CIA:
“You will excuse this hand-written letter. Maybe you will be able to bring a solution to the hopeless situation I find myself in. My wife and I find ourselves surrounded by some vigilantes; our phone bugged; and we are being followed everywhere. Either the FBI is involved in this or they do not want to accept my complaints. We are driven to insanity by the situation.”
The letter continued: "I have been behaving like a damn fool ever since my daughter died from [cystic fibrosis] over three years ago. I tried to write, stupidly and unsuccessfully, about Lee H. Oswald and must have angered a lot of people—I do not know."
Bush responded with a letter dismissing de Mohrenschildt's concerns, suggesting he was simply attracting media attention due to “renewed interest in the Kennedy assassination.”
The fact that the CIA Director took time to personally respond to de Mohrenschildt is noteworthy, suggesting a relationship beyond casual acquaintance.
De Mohrenschildt died of a gunshot wound to the head mere hours after telling investigators that the CIA had approved his contact with Oswald. His death was ruled a suicide despite suspicious circumstances, including evidence on an audio recording that someone had entered his house shortly before the gunshot was heard.
Following De Mohrenschildt’s death, Gaeton Fonzi, an investigator for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, obtained an address book from de Mohrenschildt’s briefcase. In the book, Bush was registered as “Poppy,” a nickname only intimates used for the elder Bush.
The Imposter Oswalds
Perhaps one of the most disturbing aspects of the Kennedy assassination case involves multiple instances of Oswald being impersonated in the months leading up to November 22, 1963. These impersonations suggest a sophisticated intelligence operation designed to create a trail of evidence implicating Oswald.
J. Edgar Hoover himself acknowledged this phenomenon in a recorded phone conversation with President Lyndon Johnson the day after the assassination:
“We have up here the tape and the photograph of the man who was at the Soviet Embassy, using Oswald's name,” Hoover told Johnson. “That picture and the tape do not correspond to this man's voice, nor to his appearance. In other words, it appears that there is a second person who was at the Soviet embassy down there.”
Even more remarkably, Hoover had written to the State Department's Office of Security concerning the possibility of an Oswald identity theft as early as June 1960: “Since there is a possibility that an imposter is using Oswald's birth certificate, any current information the Department of State has concerning subject [Oswald] will be appreciated.”
The phenomenon of Oswald impostors appeared repeatedly in the fall of 1963. In September, while the real Oswald was in Mexico City, another "Oswald" appeared at the Dallas-area apartment of Cuban exile Sylvia Odio, ranting about assassinating Kennedy. On November 9, 1963, while Oswald was with his wife at Ruth Paine's house, Oswald impostors were seen applying for a job at the Dallas Southland Hotel, test-driving a car at a Dallas Lincoln Mercury dealership, and displaying excellent marksmanship at the Sports Drome Rifle Range in Dallas.
These incidents strongly suggest a coordinated effort to create a public profile of Oswald as unstable, violent, and capable of assassination.
The Dallas Police Connection
The role of local law enforcement in potentially facilitating the assassination and framing of Oswald deserves greater scrutiny. One particularly suspicious incident occurred while Oswald was at his rooming house shortly after the assassination. The housekeeper, Earlene Roberts, testified that while Oswald was in his room, a police car stopped in front of the house and honked its horn. Roberts, who knew several policemen, did not recognize the officer.
Shortly thereafter, Oswald left the house and allegedly proceeded to kill Officer J.D. Tippit before being diverted to the Texas Theatre, where he was arrested. The unidentified police car suggests possible police involvement in directing Oswald's movements after the assassination.
Former Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry, who did not leave Lyndon Johnson’s side in the days following the assassination, later expressed doubt about Oswald's movements, stating: “I can't in my mind firmly make myself believe that he might not have been trying to get to Jack Ruby's apartment. You know he was in close proximity to it, and I know he didn't leave his house with the idea of going to the Texas Theatre.”
Curry even acknowledged the possibility of conspiracy: “There's been coincidental things that have happened here to lead one to believe that there could have been a conspiracy after all... There might have been a connection between the two [Oswald and Ruby] that we never established. And if there was, it was more than a local thing, I believe.”
Police Chief Curry's later admissions may have stemmed from guilt. He had overseen motorcade planning and local security, only to discover too late that the Secret Service had removed protective details from Dealey Plaza before the assassination occurred.
The Truth Remains Hidden
Despite numerous releases of JFK assassination documents, including the most recent dump, crucial evidence remains missing or heavily redacted. The inconsistencies in the case against Oswald, his connections to intelligence agencies, the role of figures like George de Mohrenschildt, and the pattern of “patsy” development seen with both Oswald and Vallee all point to a sophisticated conspiracy that has yet to be fully exposed.
The absence of powder burns on Oswald's chest, arms, hands, and cheek following examination represents just one of many pieces of exculpatory evidence that have been systematically downplayed or ignored in official accounts. The continued withholding of key documents suggests that even six decades later, powerful interests remain determined to keep the full truth about Kennedy's assassination from the American public.
According to his last Chief of Staff, General Alexander Haig, Nixon also knew that Congressman Gerald Ford, as a member of the Warren Commission, had, at the explicit direction of J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI Director, altered the official autopsy diagram for President John F. Kennedy; moving the marking from a bullet in his upper back to his neck in order to accommodate the single-bullet theory and to conceal the fact that Kennedy had been hit with more than the reported three shots. The New York Times recorded this act by Ford.
Until all documents are released in their entirety and a truly independent investigation reexamines the evidence without political constraints, the truth about who killed John F. Kennedy and why will remain one of America's most closely guarded secrets.
© 2025 Stone Cold Truth with Roger Stone
Stone Cold Truth HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Stone Cold Truth
No comments:
Post a Comment