John R, Houk, Blog Editor
© January 6, 2023
Yesterday while sharing on various Social Media Platforms I
belong to, I came across a Bitchute video posted by In4mation. The pseudonymous
In4mation shares on multiple platforms as I do. This particular video
was borrowed from The
Epoch Times TV and is narrated by Roman Balmakov (sadly, In4mation
failed to include source info in the borrowing).
I am grateful In4mation “borrowed” because Epoch-TV
can be a bit stingy on embed shares.
In4mation does not share the Epoch-TV description. Ergo,
before I cross post the Bitchute version, here is the Epoch-TV title,
narrator and description:
‘Operation
Jigsaw’: Google’s 4 New Secret Methods of Online Censorship | Facts Matter
January 2, 2023
Google has a new initiative
called “Info Intervention.” It’s a plan couched in the idea of keeping people
safe from misinformation and harmful language—and the
way to do that is to control ever more what we are able to see and say online.
Their official website bills
this new initiative as a “set of approaches, informed by behavioral science
research and validated by digital experiments, to build resilience to online
harms.” This new initiative has Google essentially using the exact same
methodology on the user that Pavlov used on the dogs during his experiments.
However, while Pavlov was trying to get the dogs to salivate, Google is trying
to make their users question anything that goes against what their fact-checkers
determine to be misinformation.
This new “Info Intervention”
initiative is being led by one of Google’s subsidiary companies—a company
called Jigsaw. It is under complete Google management, and its mission
statement is to “[apply] technological solutions, from countering extremism,
online censorship and cyber-attacks, to protecting access to information.”
Episode Resources:
🔵 Moonshot:
🔵 Info Interventions:
🔵 Jigsaw:
Before I post the Bitchute version of the video, I feel
compelled to offer some of my thoughts.
Balmakov talks of Google’s motivation is to expose
Conspiracy Theory Misinformation. This is a Globalist-Leftist program. Thus you
should be aware the Google-thinking is Leftist ideology is true-think and anything
contradicting the Left is wrong-think.
Balmakov highlights Left-think enemies White Supremacists
and Extremists. Which sounds like a great group to target and expose. The Problem
is in Left-think definitions. For the Left White Supremacism encompasses more
than bigoted racists such as Neo-Nazis (which is actually Leftist Extremism),
the KKK, Skin Heads and the such usually labeled as White Supremacists. For the
Left, if YOU are pro-Originalist Constitution, an American Patriot (American
Exceptionalism, MAGA proponent, a Biblical Morality proponent and so on),
anti-Illegal Immigration, Limited Government and such Conservative notions;
THEN YOU are a White Supremacist Extremist.
THINK ON THAT! As you watch Roman Balmakov explain how
OPERATION JIGSAW plans to program the American Sheeple into
compliance.
Then as a bonus, I want to share a lengthy yet VERY
important insights from the Substack-site A
Lily Bit on Klaus Schwab-WEF intentions to transform the entire
culture of the World into subservience to the diktats of a Technocratic
Society. A hint: You will be told how to live, think and believe – AND BE HAPPY
ABOUT IT!
And if this not upsetting enough, you should read a
relatively short essay from Victor Davis Hanson:
o The
Coup We Never Knew: We are beginning to wake up from a nightmare to
a country we no longer recognize, and from a coup we never knew; By Victor Davis Hanson;
American Greatness; 1/4/23
JRH 1/6/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I
need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU
CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores
(mine & my Honey):
My Store (please use referral code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
My Better Half’s Store (please use referral code 3917004): https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/
STORE EXAMPLE:
Bitchute VIDEO: TRIM - SALTED CARAMEL
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
**************************
Bitchute VIDEO: GOOGLE: OPERATION JIGSAW
Posted by In4mation
First Published January 5th, 2023 01:01 UTC
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Schwabian Cyberpunk
I read Klaus Schwab's book "The Fourth Industrial
Revolution", so you don't have to.
By Lily
January 6, 2023
Since the turn of the century, we have been in the midst of
the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” according to the World Economic Forum
(WEF). Klaus Schwab, the Forum's founder and CEO, describes this as a technical
revolution accompanied by nothing less than a dramatic transformation of human
civilization that “will radically affect the way we live, work, and engage with
each other.” This transformation will usher in an entirely “new chapter in
human development.”
The availability and fusion of new, “quite astonishing
technology,” according to Klaus Schwab, is a distinguishing aspect of the
Fourth Industrial Revolution. This, he claims, will eventually result in “the
blurring of the boundaries between the physical, digital, and biological
domains.” This mostly pertains to the application of bio- and neurotech,
implantable technologies, and the Internet of Bodies (IoB).
The
Cyborgization of Society: How the WEF seeks to turn you into a
spineless drone
These are technologies that are less concerned with the
human surroundings and more concerned with transforming the human person
itself, having a long-term impact on its being and identity. With the Fourth
Industrial Revolution—according to Klaus Schwab—we are facing “a metamorphosis
of the human being the likes of which we have never encountered before”.
THE MECHANIZATION OF MAN
Schwab clearly can hardly contain his excitement about the
impending technological breakthroughs and mechanization of man he predicts. He
anticipates that humans would soon begin “integrating digital technologies into
our bodies.” The new technology may “actually become a part of us” in the
process. This, he claims, will blur the distinction between technologies and
living beings. He builds his technocratic ideal of a new human being, alluding
to the “cyborg”
metaphor, and predicts that in the future there will be “strange
hybrids of digital and analog life that redefine our very being.”
Schwab's statements speak of the traditional dream of a new,
more ideal human being. This is a long-standing dream. It is nothing novel or
special. A diverse range of intellectuals often aspired for a more perfect
human being, while remaining confident of humanity's unending growth. This
conviction in development was sometimes accompanied by an unwavering faith in
scientific advances and, later, in the potential connected with the widespread
application of technology.
The new man of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, on the
other hand, differs fundamentally from prior ideas of man created by Friedrich
Nietzsche, or even Karl Marx, for example. Moral ideals, character structure,
and societal conditions have all been replaced by technology. Humans are
supposed to progress simply through the successful application of new
technologies, rather than through education, upbringing, practical experience,
or revolutionary action. According to the World Economic Forum's stated
intention, the human being emerging from the future economic transition will
predominantly be the result of new technology. This transhumanist future vision
seeks to perfect and further perfect man through the application of new
technology processes and technological interventions in his body. It promotes
an elitist and repressive technocratic image of man, the repercussions of which
cannot even be estimated at this time.
NEUROTECHNOLOGIES FOR BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR CONTROL
According to the World Economic Forum, neurotech is at the
heart of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. After all, they provide for “unique
insights—not only into how the brain interacts with its physical and social
environment, but also into novel ways of experiencing life.” They could also
assist to “advance the industry of mechanizing the human body” by tackling a
variety of neurological illnesses and physical limitations.
It is not uncommon for the military to provide the required
financing for neurotechnologies and other cutting-edge research. There, they
are initially placed in the “defensive context,” and then their results are
used. As a result, the human brain—particularly “in the border area of war and
security”—is the focus of attention. According to Schwab, crossing a national
border may need a comprehensive brain scan in the future to assess a person's
security risk.
Employers will be increasingly interested in using
neurotechnologies to boost performance, as well as to evaluate job applicants
and monitor staff. The usage of biometric technology in the workplace, as well
as tracking via radio frequency identification (RFID), may lead to “employers
directly or indirectly monitoring the brains of employees” in the future.
Increased use of brain-monitoring gadgets is also on the horizon for the retail
sector. This would allow firms to see through key consumer decision-making
tendencies and more readily encourage consumers to behave in a desired manner.
Fundamentally, neurotechnologies are proving to be ideal for
affecting people's awareness and thinking. Furthermore, such technology can aid
in decoding ideas, repairing “errors” in the brain, and “enhancing” its
function. In a society driven by algorithms and pervasive data collecting,
access to even a person's most private thoughts cannot be ruled out.
DESIGNER BABIES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
The World Economic Forum also sees biotechnologies as having
a great potential for increasing mechanization of humans. They provide critical
tools and techniques for fundamentally reframing man's connection with nature.
Recent advances in biology, particularly genetics, have been remarkable. For
example, there has been significant advancement in gene editing. Researchers
from Yatsen University in Guangzhou presented the world's first scientific
publication on modifying the DNA of human embryos in April 2015. As a result,
it is now possible to “precisely modify the DNA even in living embryos.” All of
this, Schwab explained, "means that in the future, designer babies with
exceptional features or illness resistance can be born.”
The Forum then sees the next logical step as the broad
application of synthetic biology, which results in the production of designer
creatures. This would eventually usher humanity into “a whole new age of
metabolic engineering and synthetic biology.” This should allow one to create organisms
for oneself. “They can be customized by writing their DNA. Ultimately, this is
about nothing less than interfering with future generations' genetic code,”
according to Schwab.
IMPLANTS FOR HUMAN BODY OPTIMIZATION
Computer technology will no longer be worn or carried around
on the body (wearables), but will instead be implanted directly into the human
body with implantable technologies. This will largely help to increase
communication as well as to identify people and track their behavior, in addition
to medical needs. In this regard, Klaus Schwab refers to “active implantable
microchips that break through our body's epidermal barrier and generate
exciting alternatives.” These range from “possibilities for maximizing and
enhancing human capabilities” to “integrated therapeutic systems” (human
enhancement). Small computers will be integrated into the human body in this
manner and “gradually become a physical part of us.” It is thus an issue of
technological intervention in the body, which will essentially result in the
merger of man and machine. The goal is to enable purely technological further
development and optimization of the human being, which should contribute to an
increase in performance.
The World Economic Forum has been discussing an Internet
of Bodies (IoB) in its publications for several months. Recent
technological advancements have heralded the IoB's new era. This period is
distinguished by an unparalleled number of networked devices and sensors that
can be attached to the human body (non-invasively), implanted, or otherwise
introduced into the body (invasive). Invasive technologies include digital
pills, the first use of which was allowed in the United States in 2017. They
have microscopic sensors that are linked to a medicine, activated in the
patient's stomach, and provide data.
The Internet of Bodies makes it fundamentally possible to
generate massive amounts of biometric and behavioral data. The human body will
be changed into some kind of “technology platform” as a result of this process.
However, not everyone will be able to pay the sometimes prohibitively expensive
technical optimization of their physical and mental processes, which will
inevitably lead to additional discrimination against specific groups and hence
a widening of society's already existent social divide. In this event, “a gap
is likely to grow up between all those who technically enhance their bodies and
those who are left behind,” according to Schwab.
EPOCHAL CHANGE WITHOUT DEMOCRACY
The Earth is currently “on the verge of major structural
transformation,” the World Economic Forum continues. As a result, the globe is
more polarized “between those who embrace change and those who resist it.” The
resulting “ontological inequality separates those willing and competent to
adapt from those refusing to adapt,” thereby defining who will succeed and who
will lose in this process. While the victors would gain from “some forms of
radical human optimization,” such as genetic engineering, the ‘losers’ would
not—I am so sad! The resultant tensions promote the creation of “class
conflicts and other disagreements unlike anything we have ever known.” As a
result, there is a significant risk of “greater fragmentation, exclusion, and
social instability in a hyperconnected world of increasing inequality.” Klaus
Schwab sure did read his Cyberpunk.
This is not for you…it’s for them. They want you sick or dead. pic.twitter.com/xTOMwt3K8v
— The Investigative Examiners (@TruthorConseq12) January 4, 2023
In 2016 Schwab wrote that there is a “dearth of a cohesive,
optimistic, and unified narrative that highlights the prospects and challenges
of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” However, he believes that the existence
of such a narrative would be necessary if various people and communities are to
be encouraged to play an active role in defining it while avoiding “a broad
social backlash against the basic changes.” Under such conditions, the Fourth
Industrial Revolution's present potential cannot be efficiently and thoroughly
harnessed. In numerous instances, politicians lack the essential leadership and
awareness of the changes that are occurring. Furthermore, “the required
institutional regulatory structure is either insufficient or non-existent.”
Aha, thanks Klaus. And who again told you that you are supposed to come up with
that narrative?
SHOCK STRATEGY AND "OPPORTUNITY" FOR
AUTHORITARIAN CENTRALISM DURING COVID-19
With the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic and the
resulting constraints on public life, the digital
transformation of society has found its "impetus,"
as Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret write in their book “Covid-19: The Great
Reset” which I have analyzed for you here:
‘Covid-19:
The Great Reset’ is the Perfect Manual for Tyranny: I read Klaus
Schwab’s infamous book, so you don’t have to. Here’s what I found.
As a result, they regard the pandemic as a “fundamental
turning point” in global development. They claim that the time has finally come
for a paradigm shift. In the following decades, “a new world with a new normal
may develop.”
The World Economic Forum's organizers regard the crisis
caused by the Coronavirus pandemic as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to carry
out a “Great
Reset” of the capitalist economic order. They are concerned
with the global implementation of far-reaching economic and social reforms, which
will result in a fundamental upheaval of the entire previous economic and
lifestyle system. They rely on enhanced centralism with strong authoritarian
elements in the measures they intend to implement to build their technocratic
agenda. Within a global regulatory framework (global governance), “‘bequeathed’
actors must consider themselves as elements of a globally ramified power system
that can only succeed through increasingly cooperative forms of engagement.”
Concerning the worldwide ‘catastrophe’ caused by the
pandemic, Schwab and Malleret believe that it is precisely deep, existential
crises that “carry the promise for change.” They even have the nerves to say
that the Corona pandemic is similar to World War II in terms of transformative
force because “both have the potential of a transformative crisis of previously
unknown dimensions.” Just as the Second World War caused a “fundamental
transformation in the world order and the world economy,” the “moment for a
paradigm shift” has arrived today. The pandemic expedited this transformation
by acting as a catalyst for technology changes that had already begun before
the crisis, Schwab continues.
The thesis of the close relationship between a crisis and
later social change dates back to economist Milton Friedman, who died in 2006
and was one of the most important economists of recent decades.
“Only a crisis, genuine or
perceived, leads to meaningful change. What happens next in such a crisis is
determined by the ideas that are in circulation.” — Milton Friedman
This speech by Friedman is referred to by Naomi Klein as
the key strategic ideology that would become a kind of chant for his movement:
the shock doctrine. He claims that the strategy entails “using periods of
communal traumatic experience to compel dramatic social and economic change.”
Here's how the shock doctrine works:
An initial disaster shocks practically the whole society,
softening it for the transformations that will follow. “Shocked cultures
frequently accept things they would otherwise strongly reject. Companies and
politicians would take advantage of people's fear and disorientation as a
result of the ‘shock’ to impose an economic shock therapy. A severe collective
trauma that either temporarily suspends or completely stops democratic
activities is required for this to be implemented without restriction.” This
necessitates authoritarian settings and the focused deployment of the state's
regulatory agencies.
A cabinet strategy paper on COVID-19 containment, initially
confidential, adopts and applies Friedman's shock strategy. The study was
written by a group of academics, the bulk of whom were economists, and it is
likely that it influenced the federal government's decision to impose the
lockdowns, which restricted the economy and fundamental rights. Instead of
presenting individuals with real information and educating them to build trust
and alleviate existing worries, the scientists took an entirely different
strategy. Thus, they openly support a policy whose purpose must be to instigate
terror in the peoples’ minds through a "desired shock effect.”
Schwab and Malleret saw the shock effect of a crisis on
people as a wonderful opportunity for social reform to occur. The Corona
pandemic, for example, is “a huge shock” that “brings with it the uneasy
confidence that it will have both unexpected and extraordinary implications.”
Despite the difficulty of the changes ahead, Schwab believes the pandemic will
hasten a systemic transition that was already underway before the crisis. These
include “increasing technological power” and rapid automation. For many individuals,
this means that the technologization of their lives will accelerate quickly, as
a result of which “life as they have known it up to now will rip apart at the
seams with alarming speed”. At the same time, however, “the technologization of
life provides an opportunity, and this is also the real meaning of the Fourth
Industrial Revolution.”
REPRESSION TECHNOLOGY—CONTROL AND SURVEILLANCE
In the aftermath of the Corona crisis, representatives and
supporters of the World Economic Forum see a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to
implement a comprehensive mechanization of man, as well as the system change
they forecast and consider essential, in an accelerated and non-violent manner
worldwide. According to Schwab, the drastic system transformation envisaged necessitates
people constantly adapting to the changes that are occurring. However, it is
unclear “how the constant integration of technology into our lives will
influence our idea of identity and whether it would damage key human capacities
such as self-reflection, empathy, and sympathy.”
Furthermore, governments face a genuine risk of combining
technologies to undermine civil society organizations and citizen groups that
demand for transparency in government and economic activity. Finally,
constraining such organization’s' independence and operations through laws and
other measures further reduces the space for civil society. As a result, the
instruments of the Fourth Industrial Revolution enable “new types of
surveillance and new control possibilities that run antithetical to healthy,
open communities.” Additionally, as the digital world developed and evolved,
the Corona pandemic improved options for human observation and control.
In this context, “contact tracing,” which was supposedly
critical in countering COVID-19, appears to be on track to becoming “a
facilitator of mass surveillance.”
Corporations, in particular, have become increasingly
interested in tracking their employees' health. As a result, it is reasonable
to expect increased surveillance of dependent employees in the future. This
could be attributed to concerns about their health and safety. According to
Schwab and Malleret, technical surveillance tools will most likely stay in
place even after the pandemic. This is evident, they write because “employers
have no reason to remove a monitoring system once it has been installed,
especially if one of the indirect benefits of monitoring is to check worker
productivity.”
Technical solutions implemented to contain a pandemic, on
the other hand, are also ideal for expanding a surveillance state. They can
also be employed as political surveillance technology, allowing for greater
human control as well as additional coercive tactics. Schwab and Malleret even
advocate for “a global surveillance network” in their book. According to them,
“once released,” “the genie of technical monitoring” will not be “put back into
the bottle” in the post-pandemic period and will thus be with communities for a
long time. Hooray.
DECAY, CHAOS, AND DYSTOPIA
Both authors also predict that “the number of those who are
unemployed, concerned, dissatisfied, indignant, unwell, and hungry today (will)
increase considerably” following the pandemic. They also note that “two types
of people” will confront a “particularly bleak employment situation”: “young
people entering the pandemic-ravaged labor market for the first time and
workers who may be displaced by machines.”
There will also be personal tragedies, as well as the hatred
and despair of people from all walks of life. The emergence of social unrest
must thus be seen as one of the most serious threats, with such a
development—in their opinion—even “generating to social breakdown and political
collapse” in extreme situations. However, history has shown that prospects of
eliminating current inequities “are unlikely without accompanying severe social
disturbance.”
To be sure, governments and corporations had employed
“increasingly sophisticated technologies to monitor and occasionally control
citizens and employees” in earlier years. However, the potential offered by the
Corona crisis could have a considerably greater influence on individual rights
and liberties, making it a “watershed moment in surveillance history.” Such a
scenario would result in the growth of authoritarian tendencies and more
repression. Perhaps some individuals will soon discover that “their country has
suddenly turned into a place where they no longer want to live,” as Schwab and
Malleret rightfully worry.
Overall, it “all comes down to individuals and values,”
summarizes Klaus Schwab. That is why it must be feasible to create a future
worth living in because “in its worst, dehumanized form, the Fourth Industrial
Revolution does certainly have the ability to turn people into machines without
a heart or a soul,” says Schwab. Furthermore, there had never been a moment “that
arrived with more promise, but also with such immense looming doom.” As a
result, the utopia of mankind's technological perfection may lead sooner than
predicted to a dystopian society that offers no future worth living for humans.
The yearning for a new, designed human being did not emerge
accidentally, but rather as a result of a protracted historical evolution.
However, such a growth is not predetermined nor necessarily imperative for
humanity. As a result, it is correctable. Nobody has to accept it as fate.
We've been warned!
Lily is worthy of your
SUPPORT: Paid
Subscription Options From which to Choose
© 2023 Consolidated
Frontiers – A Lily Bit HOMEPAGE
No comments:
Post a Comment