John R. Houk, Blog Editor
November 16, 2021
PEOPLE NEED TO ASK THEMSELVES why reputed scientists and
reputed medical doctors before COVID are vilified when they present science
contradicting government controlled science which amazingly seems to fluctuate
according to (Globalist-Marxist) government-control narratives.
Here is a case of vilification not based on science but the
now ad hominem of conspiracy theory even in the face of scientific data! Dr.
Mercola’s website presents the data starting with a video interview conducted
by Michael Welch with Dr. Peter McCullough under the website Global
Research.
JRH 11/16/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via - credit cards, check
cards
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:
Or if not donating you can support by getting in the Coffee from home
business earning yourself extra cash – OR just buy some TASTE GOOD healthy coffee,
that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive –
Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
**************************
COVID Jab Is Far More Dangerous Than Advertised
[Blog Editor: To date, Dr. Mercola only leaves website
postings up for 48-hours after original postings to dampen political
persecution.]
Analysis by Dr. Joseph
Mercola
November 16, 2021
Bitchute VIDEO: DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH - THE
VACCINE IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN COVID-19
[Posted by Right2Freedom
Posted on October 27th, 2021 04:47
UTC
Dr. McCullough interviewed by
Michael Welch
“The CDC and FDA are running the
program. They are NOT the people who typically run vaccine programs! The drug
companies run vaccine programs. So when Pfizer, Moderna, J&J ran their
randomized trials, we didn’t have any problems! They had good safety oversight!
They had data safety monitoring boards. The did okay! I mean I have to give the
drug companies an okay.
“But the drug companies are now just
the suppliers of the vaccine! Our government agencies are now just running the
program. There’s no external advisory committee! There’s no data safety
monitoring board! There’s no human ethics committee! NO ONE IS WATCHING OUT FOR
THIS!
“And so, the CDC and FDA pretty
clearly have their marching orders. Execute this program. That the vaccine is
safe and effective. They’re giving NO REPORTS to Americans. No safety reports.
We needed those once a month. They haven’t told doctors which is the best
vaccine. Which is the safest vaccine. They haven’t told us what groups are to
watch out for. How to we mitigate risks. Maybe there’s drug interactions. Maybe
it’s people with prior blood clotting problems or diabetes.
“They’re not telling us anything!
They literally are blindsiding us, and with no transparency, and now Americans
are scared to death! You can feel the tension in America. People are walking
off the job! They don’t want to lose their jobs! But they don’t want to die of
the vaccine!
“It’s very clear! They say,
“listen, I don’t want to die! That’s the reason I’m not taking the vaccine!”
It’s just that clear!”]
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Ø According
to a September 2021 analysis, based on conservative, best-case scenarios, the
COVID shots have killed five times more seniors (65+) than the infection
Ø In
younger people and children, the risk associated with the COVID shot, compared
to the risk of COVID-19, is bound to be even more pronounced
Ø Data
show higher vaccination rates do not translate into lower COVID-19 case rates
Ø The
COVID shots are an epic failure. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention reports having more than 30,000 spontaneous reports of either
hospitalizations and/or deaths among the fully vaccinated; data from the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services show 300,000 vaccinated CMS
recipients have been hospitalized with breakthrough infections; 60% of seniors
over age 65 hospitalized for COVID-19 have been vaccinated
Ø
50% of reported deaths after COVID-19
“vaccination” occur within 24 hours; 80% occur within the first week. According
to one report, 86% of deaths have no other explanation aside from a vaccine
adverse event. A Scandinavian study concluded about 40% of post-jab deaths
among seniors in assisted living homes are directly due to the injection
October 26, 2021, Global Research published an interview
with Dr. Peter McCullough, in which he reviews and explains the findings of a
September 2021 study published in the journal Toxicology Reports, which states:1
“A novel best-case scenario
cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the
number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to
COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic.
The risk of death from COVID-19
decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the
inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio,
perhaps substantially.”
McCullough has impeccable academic credentials. He’s an
internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and a full professor of medicine at
Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas. He also has a master’s degree in
public health and is known for being one of the top five most-published medical
researchers in the United States, in addition to being the editor of two
medical journals.
Authors Defend Their Paper
Not surprisingly, the Toxicology Reports paper has received
scathing critique from certain quarters. Still, corresponding author Ronald
Kostoff told Retraction Watch that the criticism has actually been “an
extremely small fraction” of the overall response, which by and large has been
overwhelmingly positive and supportive. Kostoff went on to say:2
“Given the blatant censorship of
the mainstream media and social media, only one side of the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’
narrative is reaching the public. Any questioning of the narrative is met with
the harshest response …
I went into this with my eyes
wide open, determined to identify the truth, irrespective of where it fell. I
could not stand idly by while the least vulnerable to serious COVID-19
consequences were injected with substances of unknown mid and long-term safety.
We published a best-case
scenario. The real-world situation is far worse than our best-case scenario,
and could be the subject of a future paper.
What these results show is that
we 1) instituted mass inoculations of an inadequately-tested toxic substance
with 2) non-negligible attendant crippling and lethal results to 3) potentially
prevent a relatively small number of true COVID-19 deaths. In other words, we
used a howitzer where an accurate rifle would have sufficed!”
COVID Jab Campaign Has Had No Discernible Impact
Certainly, data very clearly show the mass “vaccination”
campaign has not had a discernible impact on global death rates. On the
contrary, in some cases the death toll shot up after the COVID shots became
widely available. You can browse through covid19.healthdata.org3 to
see this for yourself. Several examples are also included at the very beginning
of the video.
This trend has also been confirmed in a September 2021 study4 published
in the European Journal of Epidemiology. It found COVID-19 case rates are
completely unrelated to vaccination rates.
Using data available as of September 3, 2021, from Our World
in Data for cross-country analysis, and the White House COVID-19 Team data for
U.S. counties, the researchers investigated the relationship between new
COVID-19 cases and the percentage of the population that had been fully
vaccinated.
Sixty-eight countries were included. Inclusion criteria
included second dose vaccine data, COVID-19 case data and population data as of
September 3, 2021. They then computed the COVID-19 cases per 1 million people
for each country, and calculated the percentage of population that was fully
vaccinated.
According to the authors, there was “no discernable
relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19
cases in the last seven days.” If anything, higher vaccination rates were
associated with a slight increase in cases. According to the authors:5
“[T]he trend line suggests a
marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of
population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”
The Kostoff Analysis
Getting back to the Toxicology Reports paper,6 which
is being referring to as “the Kostoff analysis,” McCullough says the analysis
is definitely making news in clinical medicine. The paper focuses on two
factors: assumptions and determinism.
Determinism describes how likely something is. For example,
if a person takes a COVID shot, it’s 100% certain they got the injection. It’s
not 50% or 75%. It’s an absolute certainty. As a result, that person has a 100%
chance of being exposed to whatever risk is associated with that shot.
On the other hand, if a person says no to the injection,
it’s not 100% chance they’ll get COVID-19, let alone die from it. You have a
less than 1% chance of being exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and getting sick. So, it’s
100% deterministic that taking the shot exposes you to the risks of the shot,
and less than 1% deterministic that you’ll get COVID if you don’t take the
shot.
The other part of the equation is the assumptions, which are
based on calculations using available data, such as pre-COVID death statistics
and death reports filed with the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reports System
(VAERS).
Mortality Data
As noted by McCullough, two reports have detailed COVID jab
death data, showing 50% of deaths occur within 24 hours and 80% occur within
the first week. In one of these reports, 86% of deaths were found to have no
other explanation aside from a vaccine adverse event. McCullough also cites a
Scandinavian study that concluded about 40% of post-jab deaths among seniors in
assisted living homes are directly due to the injection. He also cites other
eye-opening figures:
· The
U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention reports having more than 30,000
spontaneous reports of either hospitalizations and/or deaths among the fully
vaccinated
· Data
from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services show 300,000 vaccinated
CMS recipients have been hospitalized with breakthrough infections
· 60%
of seniors over age 65 hospitalized for COVID-19 have been vaccinated
COVID Shots Are ‘Failing Wholesale’
“When we put all these data together, we have clear-cut
science that the vaccines are failing wholesale,” McCullough says. The shots
are particularly useless in seniors.
Again, based on a best-case conservative scenario, seniors
are five times more likely to die from the shot than they are from the natural
infection. This scenario includes the assumption that the PCR test is accurate
and reported COVID deaths were in fact due to COVID-19, which we know is not
the case, and the assumption that the shots actually prevent death, which we have
no proof of.
All things considered, you are FAR better off taking your
chances with the natural infection, as McCullough says. The Kostoff analysis
also does not take into account the fact that there are safe and effective
treatments.
It bases its assumptions on the notion that there aren’t
any. It also doesn’t factor in the fact that the COVID shots are utterly
ineffective against the Delta and other variants. If you take into account
vaccine failure against variants and alternative treatments, it skews the
analysis even further toward natural infection being the safest alternative.
FDA and CDC Should Not Run Vaccine Programs
While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the CDC
claim not a single death following COVID inoculation was caused by the shot,
they should not be the ones making that determination, as they are both
sponsoring the vaccination campaign.
They have an inherent bias. When you conduct a trial, you
would never allow the sponsor to tell you whether the product was the cause of
death, because you know they’re biased.
What we need is an external group, a critical event
committee, to analyze the deaths being reported, as well as a data safety
monitoring board. These should have been in place from the start, but were not.
Had they been, the program would most likely have been
halted in February, as by then the number of reported deaths, 186, already
exceeded the tolerable threshold of about 150 (based on the number of
injections given). Now, we’re well over 17,000.7 There’s no
normal circumstance under which that would ever be allowed.
“The CDC and FDA are running the
[vaccination] program. They are NOT the people who typically run vaccine
programs,” McCullough says. “The drug companies run vaccine
programs.
When Pfizer, Moderna, J&J
ran their randomized trials, we didn’t have any problems. They had good safety
oversight. They had data safety monitoring boards. The did OK. I mean I have to
give the drug companies [credit].
But the drug companies are now
just the suppliers of the vaccine. Our government agencies are now just running
the program. There’s no external advisory committee. There’s no data safety
monitoring board. There’s no human ethics committee. NO one is watching out for
this!
And so, the CDC and FDA pretty
clearly have their marching orders: ‘Execute this program; the vaccine is safe
and effective.’ They’re giving no reports to Americans. No safety reports. We
needed those once a month. They haven’t told doctors which is the best vaccine,
which is the safest vaccine.
They haven’t told us what groups
are to watch out for. How to mitigate risks. Maybe there are drug interactions.
Maybe it’s people with prior blood clotting problems or diabetes. They’re not
telling us anything!
They literally are blindsiding
us, and with no transparency, and Americans now are scared to death. You can
feel the tension in America. People are walking off the job. They don’t want to
lose their jobs, but they don’t want to die of the vaccine! It’s very clear.
They say, ‘Listen, I don’t want to die. That’s the reason I’m not taking the
vaccine.’ It’s just that clear.”
Bradford Hill Criteria Are Met — COVID Jabs Cause Death
McCullough goes on to explain the Bradford Hill criterion
for causation, which is one of the ways by which we can actually determine
that, yes, the shots are indeed killing people. We’re not dealing with
coincidence.
“The first question we’d ask is:
‘Does the vaccine have a mechanism of action, a biological mechanism of action,
that can actually kill a human being?’ And the answer is yes! because the
vaccines all use genetic mechanisms to trick the body into making the lethal
spike protein of the virus.
It is very conceivable that some
people take up too much messenger RNA; they produce a lethal spike protein in
sensitive organs like the brain or the heart or elsewhere. The spike protein
damages blood vessels, damages organs, causes blood clots. So, it’s well within
the mechanism of action that the vaccine could be fatal.
Someone could have a fatal blood
clot. They could have fatal myocarditis. The FDA has official warnings of
myocarditis. They have warnings on blood clots. They have warnings on a fatal
neurologic condition called Guillain-Barré syndrome. So, the FDA warnings, the
mechanism of action, clearly say it’s possible.
The second criteria is: ‘Is it a
large effect?’ And the answer is yes! This is not a subtle thing. It’s not 151
versus 149 deaths. This is 15,000 deaths. So, it’s a very large effect size, a
large effect.
The third [criteria] is: ‘Is it
internally consistent?’ Are you seeing other things that could potentially be
fatal in VAERS? Yes! We’re seeing heart attacks. We’re seeing strokes. We’re
seeing myocarditis. We’re seeing blood clots, and what have you. So, it’s
internally consistent.
‘Is it externally consistent?’
That’s the next criteria. Well, if you look in the MHRA, the yellow card system
in England, the exact same thing has been found. In the EudraVigilance system
in [Europe] the exact same thing’s been found.
So, we have actually fulfilled
all of the Bradford Hill criteria. I’ll tell you right now that COVID-19
vaccine is, from an epidemiological perspective, causing these deaths or a
large fraction.”
Zero Tolerance for Elective Drugs Causing Death
There may be cases in which a high risk of death from a drug
might be acceptable. If you have a terminal incurable disease, for example, you
may be willing to experiment and take your chances. Under normal circumstances
however, lethal drugs are not tolerated.
After five suspected deaths, a drug will receive a black box
warning. At 50 deaths, it will be removed from the market. Considering COVID-19
has a less than 1% risk of death across age groups, the tolerance for a deadly remedy
is infinitesimal. At over 17,000 reported deaths, which in real numbers may
exceed 212,000,8 the COVID shots far surpass any reasonable
risk to protect against symptomatic COVID-19. As noted by McCullough:
“There is zero tolerance for electively taking a drug or
a new vaccine and then dying! There’s zero tolerance for that. People don’t
weigh it out and say, ‘Oh well, I’ll take my chances and die.’ And I can tell
you, the word got out about vaccines causing death in early April [2021], and
by mid-April the vaccination rates in the United States plummeted …
We hadn’t gotten anywhere near our goals. Remember,
President Biden set a goal [of 70% vaccination rate] by July 1. We never got
there because Americans were frightened by their relatives, people in their
churches and their schools dying after the vaccine.
They had heard about it, they saw it. There was an
informal internet survey done several months ago, where 12% of Americans knew
somebody who had died after the vaccine.
I’m a doctor. I’m an internist and cardiologist. I just
came from the hospital … I had a woman die of the COVID-19 vaccine … She had
shot No. 1. She had shot No. 2. After shot No. 2, she developed blood clots
throughout her body. She required hospitalization. She required intravenous
blood thinners. She was ravaged. She had neurologic damage.
After that hospitalization, she was in a walker. She came
to my office. I checked for more blood clots. I found more blood clots. I put
her back on blood thinners. I saw her about a month later. She seemed like she
was a little better. Family was really concerned. The next month I got called
by the Dallas Coroner office saying she’s found dead at home.
Most of us don’t have any problem with vaccines; 98% of
Americans take all the vaccines … I think most people who are still susceptible
would take a COVID vaccine if they knew they weren’t going to die of it or be
injured. And because of these giant safety concerns, and the lack of
transparency, we’re at an impasse.
We’ve got a very labor-constrained market. We’ve got
people walking off the job. We’ve got planes that aren’t going to fly, and it’s
all because our agencies are not being transparent and honest with America
about vaccine safety.”
Early Treatment Is Crucial, Vaxxed or Not
As noted by McCullough, the vast majority of patients
require hospitalization for COVID-19 is because they’ve not received any
treatment and the infection has been allowed free reign for days on end.
“To this day, the patients who
get hospitalized are largely those who receive no early care at home,” he
says. “They’re either denied care or they don’t know about it, and they
end up dying.
The vast majority of people who
die, die in the hospital; they don’t die at home. And the reason why they end
up in the hospital, it’s typically two weeks of lack of treatment. You can’t
let a fatal illness brew for two weeks at home with no treatment, and then
start treatment very late in the hospital. It’s not going to work.
There’s been a very good set of
analyses, one in the Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases … that showed, day
by day, one loses the opportunity of reducing the hospitalization when
monoclonal antibodies are delayed … No doctor should be considered a renegade
when they order FDA [emergency use authorized] monoclonal antibody. The
monoclonal antibodies are just as approved as the vaccines.
I just had a patient over the
weekend, fully vaccinated, took the booster. A month after the booster she went
on a trip to Dubai. She just came back, and she got COVID-19! … I got her a
monoclonal antibody infusion that day. [The following day] she started the
sequence of multidrug therapy for COVID-19. I am telling you, she is going to
get through this illness in a few days …
Podcaster Joe Rogan just went
through this. Governor Abbott was also a vaccine failure. He went through it.
Former President Trump went through it. Americans should see the use of
monoclonal antibodies in high risk patients, followed by drugs in an oral
sequenced approach. This is standard of care!
It is supported by the
Association of Physicians and Surgeons, the Truth for Health Foundation, the
American Front Line Doctors, and the Front Line Critical Care Consortium. This
is not renegade medicine. This is what patients should have. This is the
correct thing! …
If we can’t get the monoclonal
antibodies, we certainly use hydroxychloroquine, supported by over 250 studies,
ivermectin, supported by over 60 studies, combined with azithromycin or
doxycycline, inhaled budesonide … full-dose aspirin … nutraceuticals including
zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, quercetin, NAC … we do oral and nasal
decontamination with povidone-iodine.
In acutely sick patients we do
it every four hours, [and it] massively reduces the viral load … Fortunately,
we have enough doctors now and enough patient awareness, patients who …
understand that early treatment is viable, is necessary, and it should be
executed.”
“The Truth
About COVID-19” exposes the hidden agenda behind the pandemic, showing
the countermeasures have nothing to do with public health and everything to do
with ushering in a new social and economic system based on totalitarian,
technocracy-led control. So, it’s not misinformation they fear. It’s the truth
they want to prevent from spreading. Pick
up a copy of this best-selling book today before it’s too late.
Sources and References
1, 6 Toxicology Reports September 2021; 8: 1665-1684
2 Retraction Watch October 4, 2021
4, 5 European Journal of Epidemiology September 30, 2021
7 OpenVAERS Data as of October 15, 2021
8 SKirsch.io/vaccine-resources
© 1997-2021 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights
Reserved.
Disclaimer: The
entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola,
unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the
respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this
website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified
health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended
as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of
Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own
health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a
qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking
medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional
before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on
your site please click here. This
content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and
information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from
Dr. Mercola is required.
+++++++++++++++++++++
[Blog Editor: Here some bonus medical tyranny info from Sarah
Westall. She utilizes ads to pay the bills so might want to skip through that
to get to the meat. I begin with her website post and use the Bitchute platform
version (she offers many venues)]
Medical Mafia & The AMA – The Power Structure Taking
US Down & Keeping US Sick W/ Dr. Glidden
11-15-2021
AMA
Medical Tyranny - Power Corrupts
Dr. Peter
Glidden joins the program to discuss the American Medical Association and the Tyranny
that we have been living under since Congress established laws forcing all
Americans to follow only the AMA’s direction funded and controlled by the
Pharmaceutical industry. This government/medical alliance has crippled the
country and has led to more deaths and misery than anyone could ever have
imagined. Learn the better alternative to a healthy life at ControlYourHealth.care
Members of Ebener and SarahWestll.tv see exclusive interview
with Dr. Glidden. Learn the 2 simple nutritions, when deficient, causes
heartburn.
Dr. Peter Glidden Biography
Dr. Peter Glidden is an outspoken advocate of Wholistic
Health. For more than two decades, he has been treating people with
Naturopathic therapeutics including Homeopathy, Heavy Metal Chelation, Herbal
Medicine and Bio-identical Hormone Supplementation.
Dr. Glidden received his BS degree from the University of
Massachusetts in Amhurst. He earned his ND from Bastyr University in
Seattle, Washington.
Dr. Glidden currently has a private naturopathic practice in
Illinois. He is also a member of the American Association of Naturopathic
Physicians and the Illinois Association of Naturopathic Physicians.
Bitchute VIDEO: MEDICAL MAFIA & THE AMA
- THE POWER STRUCTURE TAKING US DOWN & KEEPING US SICK W/ DR. GLIDDEN
Posted by Sarah Westall - Business
Game Changers
Posted on November 14th, 2021 18:45 UTC
Learn more at https://ControlYourHealth.care
Updated 10-11-21: Access solution resource document at https://sarahwestall.com/important-proven-solutions-to-keep-from-getting-sick-even-if-you-have-the-mrna-shot/
Dr. Peter Glidden joins the program to discuss the American
Medical Association and the Tyranny that we have been living under since
Congress established laws forcing all Americans to follow only the AMA's
direction funded and controlled by the Pharmaceutical industry. This
government/medical alliance has crippled the country and has led to more deaths
and misery than anyone could ever have imagined. Learn the better alternative
to a healthy life at https://ControlYourHealth.care
Dr. Zelenko's Vitamin Pack protects you from getting sick (an Ivermectin and
Hydroxychloroquine alternative): https://zstacklife.com/products/z-stack?ref=hpkvvpuhn0
No comments:
Post a Comment