John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© September 3, 2021
WELL … It is protest COVID tyranny time on my blog. First I
am cross posting a Dr. Joseph Mercola post about lying Left-Wing fact checkers especially
looking at Medical tyranny. NOTE: Although I will embed the link, Dr.
Mercola has made the choice to delete content on his website withing 48-hours
of posting due to medical persecution.
Then I am cross posting a series of videos on COVID tyranny
in order of original post:
o TOP DOCTORS, LAWYERS,
SCIENTISTS, HEALTH CARE WORKERS TELLING YOU WHAT'S IN THE VACCINE – 8/31/21
o DR. ANDREW BOSTOM ON BLAZE
TV HINTS AT THE COMMUNIST NATURE OF THE COVID/VAXX SITU – 9/1/21
o DR. MARK MCDONALD ON THE
REMARKABLY COMMUNIST NATURE OF COVID MEASURES 9/1/21
o Joe
Rogan Announces He Has COVID-19 And Feels Great After Ivermectin And Multi-Drug
Treatment – 9/1/21
o ANDREW BOSTOM ON MATT
ALLEN: JURY IN ON NATURAL IMMUNITY, FAR BETTER THAN THE SHOTS – 9/2/21
o
The
Story Of Ivermectin And COVID-19 – 9/2/21 ***VERY IMPORTANT!
And I end with a cross post of a FEE report that a Harvard Epidemiologist
believes he has the data that “Demolished” the reasoning behind COVID Jab
passports.
HERE WE GO!
JRH 9/3/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via - credit cards, check
cards
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:
Or if not donating you can support by getting in the Coffee from home
business earning yourself extra cash – OR just buy some TASTE GOOD healthy coffee,
that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive –
Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
********************
Top Misinformation Article Attributed to Chicago Tribune
COVID-19 MISINFORMATION
Analysis by Dr. Joseph
Mercola
September 02, 2021
Mercola
– Take Control of Your Health
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Ø
According to Facebook’s content transparency
report for the first quarter of 2021, the most popular article shared on the
platform between January 2021 and March 2021 was about a 56-year-old Miami,
Florida, obstetrician who died two weeks after his first Pfizer injection
Ø
When something goes viral, the total number of
views is still a tiny fraction of the overall content. Even the biggest
accounts make up but a small portion of overall content views. Combined, the
top 20 accounts with the most views during the first quarter accounted for only
1.18% of all U.S. content views
Ø
According to Monika Bickert, vice president of
Facebook content policy, the “Disinformation Dozen” identified by the Center
for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) are responsible for just 0.05% of all views
of vaccine-related content on Facebook, which is 1,460 times lower than CCDH’s
outrageous claim of 73%
Ø
There are 84,700 Google search results for
CCDH's defamatory phrase “disinformation dozen,” including 16,000 news stories
in the international press, nearly all of which parrot the CCDH's defamatory
statements verbatim and report them as fact
Ø
According to Bickert, the CCDH created a “faulty
narrative” based on “a narrow set of 483 pieces of content over six weeks from
only 30 groups,” which “are in no way representative of the hundreds of
millions of posts that people have shared about COVID-19 vaccines in the past
months on Facebook.” There’s also no rational explanation for how the CCDH
identified content as “anti-vax” or what criteria they used to select the 30
groups
According to Facebook’s content transparency report for the
first quarter of 2021, released in mid-August 2021, the most popular article
shared on the platform between January 2021 and March 2021 was about a
56-year-old Miami, Florida, obstetrician who died two weeks after his first
Pfizer injection.1
The story initially ran in the South Florida Sun Sentinel2 April
8, 2021, and was republished by the Chicago Tribune that same day.3 The
doctor, Dr. Gregory Michael, received his first dose December 18, 2020.
Three days later, he developed small spots on his hands and
feet, which prompted him to go to the emergency room, where they found he had
an abnormally low blood count. Platelets stop bleeding by clotting, and when
platelets drop too low, internal bleeding can occur, resulting in what looks
like blood blisters on the skin.
Michael remained in intensive care for two weeks, but no
matter what they did, his platelet count refused to budge. During the night of
January 3, 2021, he died of a massive stroke. According to the coroner, the
COVID injection could not be ruled out as a contributing or causative factor.
In a Facebook post, Michael’s widow stated he’d been “very
healthy” and that he’d been a COVID-19 vaccine advocate. His death caused her
to question the safety of the shot, however.
“I believe that people should be aware that side effects can
happen, that the vaccine is not good for everyone and in this case destroyed a
beautiful life, a perfect family and has affected so many people in this
community.” she wrote. “Please do not let his death be in vain please save more
lives my making this information news.”4
Even Viral Content Has Minor Reach
According to The New York Times,5 Facebook
held off on publishing the first-quarter report for fear the findings might
“look bad for the company.” Executives decided they wanted to make some “key
fixes to the system” before releasing it. That’s why it wasn’t published until
August.
Interestingly, the report reveals that even when something
goes viral, the total number of views is still a tiny fraction of the overall
content. Even the biggest accounts make up but a small portion of overall
content views. Combined, the top 20 accounts with the most views during the
first quarter — which included UNICEF, The Dodo and LADbible — accounted for
only 1.18% of all U.S. content views.
As noted in the report, this “shows that, even though it may
seem like a page or post has extensive reach on the platform, that isn’t the
case when measured against the total amount of content available on the
platform.”
Facebook Calls Out CCDH for Manufacturing ‘Faulty
Narrative’
As you may know, an obscure one-man organization funded by
dark money called the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) has published
several reports, including “The Anti-Vaxx Playbook,”6 “The
Disinformation Dozen”7 and “Disinformation Dozen: The Sequel,”8 in
which the founder, Imran Ahmed — an unregistered foreign agent — claims to have
identified the top most influential “anti-vaxxers” in the U.S.
In a completely unexpected turn of events, Facebook is now
calling out the CCDH for having manufactured a faulty narrative without
evidence against the 12 individuals targeted in its reports (myself included).9
This is important, seeing how the CCDH reports have been the
primary “reference” source of authority used by media and government officials
to smear, threaten and infringe on American citizens’ right to free speech.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security even lists
promulgating “false narratives” around COVID-19 as a top national security
threat, which basically puts a “domestic terrorist” target on the backs of
those of us who have been identified by the CCDH as the most prolific
“superspreaders” of COVID misinformation.
“[The ‘Disinformation Dozen’]
are responsible for about just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on
Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related posts they’ve shared, whether true
or false, as well as URLs associated with these people. ~ Monika Bickert, vice
president of Facebook content policy”
As reported by GreenMed Info:10
“Google now shows an
astounding 84,700 search results for CCDH's defamatory phrase ‘disinformation
dozen. ’Amazingly, this includes 16,000 news stories within the international
press, approximately 100% of which are word-for-word amplifications of CCDH's claims/defamatory
statements and reported uncritically as fact.
In addition, the Surgeon
General Vivek Murthy, the White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, and president
Biden all used CCDH's report as the sole source for their own defamatory
accusations, reaching a dangerous rhetorical climax on July 20th when Biden stated
that these 12 individuals are literally "killing people" [by
spreading misinformation].”
No Evidence to Support ‘Misinfo Superspreader’ Claim
In an August 18, 2021, Facebook report, Monika Bickert, vice
president of Facebook content policy, sets the record straight, and in the
process, demolishes the CCDH’s claims:11
“In recent weeks, there has
been a debate about whether the global problem of COVID-19 vaccine
misinformation can be solved simply by removing 12 people from social media
platforms. People who have advanced this narrative contend that these 12 people
are responsible for 73% of online vaccine misinformation on Facebook. There
isn’t any evidence to support this claim …
That said, any amount of
COVID-19 vaccine misinformation that violates our policies is too much by our
standards — and we have removed over three dozen Pages, groups and Facebook or
Instagram accounts linked to these 12 people, including at least one linked to
each of the 12 people, for violating our policies.
We have also imposed
penalties on nearly two dozen additional Pages, groups or accounts linked to
these 12 people, like moving their posts lower in News Feed so fewer people see
them or not recommending them to others. We’ve applied penalties to some of
their website domains as well so any posts including their website content are
moved lower in News Feed.
The remaining accounts
associated with these individuals are not posting content that breaks our
rules, have only posted a small amount of violating content, which we’ve
removed, or are simply inactive.
In fact, these 12 people are
responsible for about just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on
Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related posts they’ve shared, whether true
or false, as well as URLs associated with these people.”
It’s worth restating the key point in this quote: Combined,
the top 12 individuals and organizations identified by the CCDH as being
responsible for a whopping 73% of vaccine misinformation on Facebook, are in
fact only responsible for 0.05% of vaccine-related content — 1,460 times lower
than the CCDH’s outrageous claim. That’s no small discrepancy.
CCDH Claims Blasted as Unjustified and Biased
Bickert goes on to refer directly to the CCDH report “The
Disinformation Dozen,”12 stating:
“The report13 upon
which the faulty narrative is based analyzed only a narrow set of 483 pieces of
content over six weeks from only 30 groups, some of which are as small as 2,500
users.
They are in no way
representative of the hundreds of millions of posts that people have shared
about COVID-19 vaccines in the past months on Facebook.
Further, there is no
explanation for how the organization behind the report identified the content
they describe as ‘anti-vax’ or how they chose the 30 groups they included in
their analysis. There is no justification for their claim that their data
constitute a ‘representative sample’ of the content shared across our apps.”
CCDH Meets Definition of ‘Hateful Extremists’
Ironically, while the CCDH claims to “counter hate” online,
and Ahmed sits on the Steering Committee of the U.K. Commission on Countering
Extremism, CCDH itself actually meets the Commission’s definition of hateful
extremists.14 In the 2019 Commission document, “Challenging
Hateful Extremism,” the term is defined as:15
“Behaviours that can incite
and amplify hate, or engage in persistent hatred, or equivocate about and make
the moral case for violence; And that draw on hateful, hostile or supremacist
beliefs directed at an out-group who are perceived as a threat to the
wellbeing, survival or success of an in-group; And that cause, or are likely to
cause, harm to individuals, communities or wider society.”
In addition, in the forward of the report, lead commissioner
Sara Khan notes that “Hateful extremists seek to restrict individual liberties
and curtail the fundamental freedoms that define our country.”
All of these definitions and clarifications of what hateful
extremism is fit the CCDH to a T. Ahmed manufactured data to create a false
narrative that 12 individuals pose a threat to the well-being and survival of
the whole world, and then used that narrative to incite hate against us and
curtail our freedom of speech.
Who Fact Checks the Fact Checkers?
In related news, the self-appointed arbiter of factual
truths, NewsGuard, has had to backpedal in recent months and issue dozens of
corrections to “fact checks” in which they’ve labeled the Wuhan lab leak theory
as a debunked conspiracy theory with no basis in fact.
Since the beginning of the COVID pandemic, NewsGuard has
wrongly down-rated 225 websites for articles mentioning the lab leak theory.16 In
reality, there’s far more evidence to support the lab leak theory than any
other theory, but it took over a year before the weight of this evidence became
too obvious for the media to ignore.
NewsGuard’s erroneous fact checks were recently highlighted
in an August 11, 2021, report by the American Institute for Economic Research
(AIER).17
AIER decided to take a closer look at NewsGuard after
receiving a request for comments on a NewsGuard fact check article regarding
AIER and the Great Barrington Declaration — a statement written by public
health experts from Harvard, Stanford and Oxford that calls on government to
implement focused protection rather than lockdowns and self-isolation. AIERS investigation
found that:18
“… NewsGuard falls far short
of the very same criteria for accuracy and transparency that it claims to apply
to other websites. Most of the company’s fact checkers lack basic
qualifications in the scientific and social-scientific fields that they purport
to arbitrate.
NewsGuard’s own track record
of commentary — particularly on the Covid-19 pandemic — reveals a pattern of
unreliable and misleading claims that required subsequent corrections, and
analysis that regularly conflates fact with opinion journalism in rendering a
judgement on a website’s content.
Furthermore, the company’s
own practices fall far short of the transparency and disclosure standards it
regularly applies to other websites … NewsGuard’s staff primarily evaluates
scientific claims by appealing to the authority of public figures who they
designate as ‘experts’ on the subject in question.
Their approach generally
avoids direct examination of the evidence surrounding contested claims, and
instead cherry-picks a figure to treat as an authoritative final word … many of
their preferred authorities are political officeholders rather than persons
trained in scientific or social-scientific methods.
By selectively curating
cherry-picked political authorities rather than evaluating evidence directly,
NewsGuard’s approach to fact-checking effectively sidesteps the scientific
method. This strategy is rendered even more problematic by the general lack of
scientific expertise within NewsGuard’s team of writers.
We examined the educational
credentials, including the highest degree listed, for 28 publicly identified
staff members on NewsGuard’s website. The company’s staff page reveals
shockingly little expertise in either the hard sciences such as medicine or
social sciences such as public policy, economics, and related fields ...
Most NewsGuard articles on
Covid-19 topics and policies are written by [NewsGuard Deputy Editor for
Health, John] Gregory, whose only identified qualification is a bachelor’s
degree in Media Arts … Gregory would not qualify as an expert in most of the
fields he is responsible for fact-checking …
Of course, non-experts have
every right to offer opinions on scientific and social-scientific matters.
Whether or not they should be taken seriously as fact checkers or act as
arbiters of scientific disputes is another question entirely.”
NewsGuard Staff by Field and Highest Degree Attained
NewsGuard Apologizes for Erroneous Fact Checks
After being confronted about its erroneous fact checks on
the lab leak theory, NewsGuard offered the following apology in a statement
sent to AIER:19
“NewsGuard either
mischaracterized the sites’ claims about the lab leak theory, referred to the
lab leak as a ‘conspiracy theory,’ or wrongly grouped together unproven claims
about the lab leak with the separate, false claim that the COVID-19 virus was man-made
without explaining that one claim was unsubstantiated, and the other was false.
NewsGuard apologizes for
these errors. We have made the appropriate correction on each of the 21
labels.”
AIER commented on the apology:20
“Gregory and his colleagues
appear to have simply decided that their own premature dismissal of the lab
leak hypothesis equated to ‘fact’ and proceeded to penalize other sites not for
factual errors, but rather for diverging from NewsGuard’s own editorial
position on the same subject.
When this position turned out
to be mistaken, NewsGuard pivoted to remove the errors — albeit in
non-transparent ways that downplay the significance or pervasiveness of their
mistake.”
NewsGuard Fails to Fulfill Its Own Credibility Criteria
In their report, AIER goes on to apply the criteria
NewsGuard uses to evaluate a website’s credibility to NewsGuard itself. It’s
ranking? A paltry 36.25 out of 100. According to AIER:21
“This website fails to adhere
to several basic journalistic standards, and should be used with extreme
caution as a source for verifying the reliability of the websites it purports
to rate …
When we see fact checkers
like NewsGuard, who not only fail to uphold their high-sounding principles but
even publicly encourage working with the government to suppress speech, we
should raise red flags.”
The NewsGuard ratings are meant to influence the reader,
instructing them to disregard content with cautionary colors and cautions. That
it would serve as the thought police of the technocratic establishment that
seeks to silence dissent and bury information that doesn’t help move the Great
Reset agenda forward is no surprise.
Especially considering its primary startup capital came from
Publicis Groupe,22 a PR group that represents most of Big
Pharma, including vaccine makers, and Big Tech. NewsGuard is also backed by
Microsoft23 and Google.
The Publicis Groupe has been manipulating what people think
about commercial products for nearly a century. Over that century, this
advertising and communications firm bought or partnered with targeted
advertising avenues, beginning with newspapers, followed by radio, TV, cinema
and the internet.
With revenue avenues secured, Publicis’ clients and partners
built a global presence that dominated the advertising world. Be it tobacco or
sugar, Publicis Groupe found a way to promote and strengthen big industries.
Publicis was recently sued24 for its deadly and illegal
marketing of Purdue Pharma’s opioid products.
When you consider that Publicis describes its business model
approach as putting clients and their needs and objectives at the center of all
they do so their clients can “win and grow,” it’s easy to see what’s driving
NewsGuard.
Overall, NewsGuard is just another big business aimed at
keeping the chemical, drug and food industries, as well as mainstream media,
intact by discrediting and eliminating unwanted competitors and analysts who
empower you with information that runs counter to any given industry’s agenda.
If you’re as disturbed by censorship as I am, be sure to
contact your local library today to find out if they’re one of the more than
700 libraries using NewsGuard. If they are, then ask them if they’re aware of
NewsGuard’s censorship of truthful news that is now encroaching on scientific
freedom and threatening the very roots of our democracy.
If your local library is using NewsGuard, it would be
helpful to start a campaign to get it removed. Contact your neighbors and let
them know what is happening so they can kick out this public health threat.
Likewise, whenever you see someone referencing reports by the CCDH, call them
out on it.
My latest book, “The
Truth About COVID-19,” is an instant best seller. With
hundreds of thousands of copies sold, it has a nearly perfect 5-star
rating so grab your copy of the #1 best-selling book on Amazon today before
Biden bans it.
Sources and References
4 Chicago Tribune April 8, 2021
5 New York Times August 20, 2021 (Archived)
6 The Anti-Vaxx Playbook (PDF)
7, 12, 13 CCDH, The Disinformation Dozen
8 Misinformation Dozen: The Sequel
9, 11 Facebook August 18, 2021
10 GreenMed Info August 19, 2021
14 Greenmed Info March 25, 2021
15 Challenging Hateful Extremism 2019
16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 AIER August 11, 2021
22 Washington Post March 3, 2018
23 axios.com August 23, 2018, NewsGuard Launches First Product
With Help From Microsoft
© 1997-2021 Dr. Joseph Mercola.
All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: The
entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola,
unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the
respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this
website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified
health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended
as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of
Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own
health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a
qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking
medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional
before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on
your site please click here. This
content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and
information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from
Dr. Mercola is required.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bitchute VIDEO: TOP DOCTORS, LAWYERS,
SCIENTISTS, HEALTH CARE WORKERS TELLING YOU WHAT'S IN THE VACCINE
Posted by wil paranormal
Posted August 31st, 2021 20:51 UTC
RUMBLE LINK for those unable to properly view this video on
BitChute:
https://rumble.com/vlx72f-top-doctors-lawyers-scientists-health-care-workers-telling-people-the-vacci.html
Many have yet to wake up as to the mass murder going on all
around them. Therefore, a short repeat session.
This Fall and Winter months will show everyone the horror and scope of this
Genocide when 70% of the Vaccinated will begin to die off.
They have absolutely no idea what has been injected into them and the
ingredients have been wiped clean from the vaccine inserts to make sure they
never find out.
Health care professionals from around the world along with top scientists and
Lawyers lay it all out for everyone to hear.
It's unfortunate that the vaccinated did little or 0% Research on this MRNA
injection.
If they did, very few would ever had volunteered for this TRIAL jab which has
altered their DNA with 100% poison - GRAPHENE OXIDE, lethal parasites and
stainless steel.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Bitchute VIDEO: DR. ANDREW BOSTOM ON BLAZE
TV HINTS AT THE COMMUNIST NATURE OF THE COVID/VAXX SITU
Posted by VladTepesBlog
Posted September 1st, 2021 02:34
Gotta say, This is Lysenko. Real science was barely a memory
already by 2019.
Bitchute VIDEO: DR. MARK MCDONALD ON THE
REMARKABLY COMMUNIST NATURE OF COVID MEASURES
Posted by VladTepesBlog
Posted September 1st, 2021 15:12 UTC
I think he nails every point in this video. Dr. McDonald, a
California psychiatrist, calmly points out most of the important aspects of how
governments are training us all into submission.
++++++++++++++++++++
Rumble VIDEO: Joe
Rogan Announces He Has COVID-19 And Feels Great After Ivermectin And Multi-Drug
Treatment
Published September
1, 2021
Monoclonal Antibodies
Ivermectin
Z-Pack or Zithromax (azithromycin)
Prednisone
NAD Drip
Vitamin Drip
Bitchute VIDEO: ANDREW BOSTOM ON MATT
ALLEN: JURY IN ON NATURAL IMMUNITY, FAR BETTER THAN THE SHOTS
Posted by VladTepesBlog
Posted September 2nd, 2021
For 100% sure it lasts longer.
Rumble VIDEO: The
Story Of Ivermectin And COVID-19
Posted by KanekoaTheGreat
Published September 2, 2021
Harvard Epidemiologist Says the Case for COVID Vaccine
Passports Was Just Demolished
New research found that natural immunity offers
exponentially more protection than COVID-19 vaccines.
Martin
Kuldorff - Harvard Epidemiologist
Photo by Thérèse Soukar, CC
BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
A newly published medical study found
that infection from COVID-19 confers considerably longer-lasting and stronger
protection against the Delta variant of the virus than vaccines.
“The natural immune protection that develops after a
SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta
variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech
vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with
a ‘Don’t try this at home’ label,” the Scientific American reported Thursday.
“The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were
much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it,
or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.”
Put another way, vaccinated individuals were 27 times more
likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity
from COVID.
In Israel, vaccinated individuals had 27 times higher risk of symptomatic COVID infection compared to those with natural immunity from prior COVID disease [95%CI:13-57, adjusted for time of vaccine/disease]. No COVID deaths in either group.https://t.co/hopImCD1D0
— Martin Kulldorff (@MartinKulldorff) August 25, 2021
A Death Blow to Vaccine Passports?
The findings come as many governments around the world are
demanding citizens acquire “vaccine passports” to travel. New
York City, France,
and the Canadian provinces of Quebec
and British Columbia are among those who have recently
embraced vaccine passports.
Meanwhile, Australia has floated the idea of making higher
vaccination rates a
condition of lifting its lockdown in jurisdictions, while
President Joe Biden is considering making
interstate travel unlawful for people who have not been
vaccinated for COVID-19.
Vaccine passports are morally dubious for many reasons, not
the least of which is that freedom
of movement is a basic human right. However, vaccine passports
become even more senseless in light of the new findings out of Israel and
revelations from the CDC, some say.
Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff said
research showing that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection
than vaccines means vaccine passports are both unscientific and discriminatory,
since they disproportionately affect working class individuals.
“Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better
immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only
scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical,” Kulldorff, a
biostatistician and epidemiologist, observed on Twitter.
Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical. https://t.co/d14kTPnCWk
— Martin Kulldorff (@MartinKulldorff) August 27, 2021
Nor is the study out of Israel a one-off. Media reports show
that no fewer than 15 academic studies have found that natural immunity offers
immense protection from COVID-19.
“Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC's campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all versions of the virus than those with any of the vaccines.”
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) August 26, 2021
15 studies show…https://t.co/oXaI3L0Y3S
Moreover, CDC research shows that vaccinated individuals
still get infected with COVID-19 and carry just as much of the virus in their
throat and nasal passage as unvaccinated individuals.
“High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission
and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected
with Delta can transmit the virus,” CDC Rochelle Director Walensky noted
following a
Cape Cod outbreak that included mostly vaccinated individuals.
These data suggest that vaccinated individuals are still
spreading the virus much like unvaccinated individuals.
The Bottom Line
Vaccine passports would be immoral and a massive government
overreach even in the absence of these findings. There is simply no historical
parallel for governments attempting to restrict the movements of healthy people
over a respiratory virus in this manner.
Yet the justification for vaccine passports becomes not just
wrong but absurd in light of these new revelations.
People who have had COVID already have significantly more
protection from the virus than people who’ve been vaccinated. Meanwhile, people
who’ve not had COVID and choose to not get vaccinated may or may not be making
an unwise decision. But if they are, they are principally putting only
themselves at risk.
Youtube VIDEO: Freedom
vs. Fear: Which Side Are YOU On?
[Posted by Foundation for
Economic Education
Posted May 3, 2020
…
*** Note: This video was originally
meant to be published on April 2nd, but after a month in YouTube purgatory,
it's finally available. ***
Captain America: Winter Soldier was
the first film in the MCU that successfully integrated real-world current
events and important policy issues into its plot.
It hit on critical issues like
warrantless surveillance, drone warfare, due process, and other fallout from
the USA PATRIOT Act.
Fear pushes people to accept
policies that they would never accept under less stressful conditions, and it
opens the door for unscrupulous leaders to take control over people's lives. In
2001, … READ ENTIRETY]
Jonathan Miltimore
is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the
subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox
News, and the Star Tribune.
Bylines: Newsweek, The
Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The
Federalist, the Epoch Times.
About FEE
The Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) is
a 501(c)3 educational foundation and has been trusted by parents and teachers
since 1946 to captivate and inspire tomorrow’s leaders with sound economic
principles and the entrepreneurial spirit with free online courses, top-rated
in-person seminars, free books for classrooms, as well as relevant and worldly
daily online content.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except for material
where copyright is reserved by a party other than FEE.
No comments:
Post a Comment