John R. Houk, Editor
Posted May 22, 2018
Even as the Leftist Mainstream Media and Obama Deep State operatives
spin an alternative story, only a fool or a lying spin doctor would not admit
Obama inserted his political desires into the 2016 election cycle.
Here are two news articles discussing FBI spying.
***************************
Hold On, The FBI Was Spying On The Trump Campaign
*Before* The Counterintelligence Probe Officially Started?
By Matt
Vespa
May 22, 2018 2:27 PM
Who is the FBI spy that was trying to glean information on
the Trump campaign? Well, reportedly, it’s longtime CIA operative Stefan
Halper. And no, it wasn’t leaked. If this is true, and most likely it is,
there’s enough public information on him, along with the news media leaving a
trail of breadcrumbs that confirmed his identity. They were as subtle as a
sledgehammer.
Last week, it was reported that the FBI had spied on the
Trump campaign during the 2016 election. It was later revealed by Axios that
Halper had tried to
get a top-level job in the administration after the campaign.
Yet, before we get into what The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald and others have
noted about the timeline of the FBI’s Russia probe, let’s look real quick at
the linguistic martial arts the news media is playing here. All of this deep
state/Trump was spied on stuff was written off by the news media as
conspiratorial garbage. Well, it turns out they were wrong. They’re wrong about
everything it seems, especially reports covering this White House. This is
how The New York Times covered this development. They also
said that this spy is
someone well known within D.C. circles.
President Trump accused the F.B.I.
on Friday, without evidence, of sending a spy to secretly infiltrate his 2016
campaign “for political purposes” even before the bureau had any inkling of the
“phony Russia hoax.”
In fact, F.B.I. agents sent an
informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence
that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. The
informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that
summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people
familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the
other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to
Russia.
[…]
F.B.I. agents were seeking more
details about what Mr. Papadopoulos knew about the hacked Democratic emails,
and one month after their Russia investigation began, Mr. Papadopoulos received
a curious message. The academic inquired about his interest in writing a
research paper on a disputed gas field in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, a
subject of Mr. Papadopoulos’s expertise.
The informant offered a $3,000
honorarium for the paper and a paid trip to London, where the two could meet
and discuss the research project.
“I understand that this is rather
sudden but thought that given your expertise it might be of interest to you,”
the informant wrote in a message to Mr. Papadopoulos, sent on Sept. 2, 2016.
Mr. Papadopoulos accepted the offer
and arrived in London two weeks later, where he met for several days with the
academic and one of his assistants, a young woman.
Over drinks and dinner one evening
at a high-end London hotel, the F.B.I. informant raised the subject of the
hacked Democratic National Committee emails that had spilled into public view
earlier that summer, according to a person familiar with the conversation. The
source noted how helpful they had been to the Trump campaign, and asked Mr.
Papadopoulos whether he knew anything about Russian attempts to influence the
2016 presidential election.
Yeah, how is that not spying? It is. And this is the problem
with liberalism as of late; they’ve wantonly decided to ignore the definition
of what words mean. Spying is now informing. Invasions are now called “uncontested
arrivals,” but back to Mr. Halper and the timeline. It seems that
his alleged information gathering operation started way before his rendezvous
with Papadopoulos. Carter Page and Sam Clovis, two others affiliated with the
Trump team, were also approached by Halper as well.
Greenwald noted that Halper has history with this sort of
operation; he reportedly did something similar to Carter’s 1980 re-election
campaign. Halper with some other former intelligence operatives allegedly
funneled information on then-President Carter’s foreign policy to Republican
candidate, and future president, Ronald Reagan. This was all revealed in 1983.
Puh-lease. Facts:— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 21, 2018
DOJ/FBI blew their source, by leaking every detail to friendly media to spin. NYT and WaPo stories cite "gov" sources--not Congress. And Daily Caller had that name out months ago, before news of spying.
https://t.co/amtIzZpgVc
Greenwald also noted that while the news media knew who the
FBI spy was, they refused to reveal his name, though they left so many clues
that they might as well have disclosed the source. He also adds that the FBI
and members of Congress are being more or less absurd that revealing the source
would be damaging to national security; we pretty much already know who it is.
And his work was already been reported. The Intercept then details how the
Daily Caller was able to discern whom the source was using entirely
public information, which brings us to FBI timeline. When did this
investigation begin because it seems there were other times that Halper reached
out to Trump team members prior to the Papadopoulos meeting that supposedly led
to the FBI opening up a counterintelligence investigation in July of 2016. By
the way, this
theory was published by the Times in December of
2017, and it was ripped apart.
Via Intercept:
…the New York Times reported in
December of last year that the FBI investigation into possible ties between the
Trump campaign and Russia began when George Papadopoulos drunkenly boasted to
an Australian diplomat about Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton. It was the
disclosure of this episode by the Australians that “led the F.B.I. to open an
investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and
whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired,” the NYT claimed.
But it now seems clear that
Halper’s attempts to gather information for the FBI began before that. “The
professor’s interactions with Trump advisers began a few weeks before the
opening of the investigation, when Page met the professor at the British
symposium,” the Post reported. While it’s not rare for the FBI to gather
information before formally opening an investigation, Halper’s earlier snooping
does call into question the accuracy of the NYT’s claim that it was the drunken
Papadopoulos ramblings that first prompted the FBI’s interest in these possible
connections. And it suggests that CIA operatives, apparently working with at
least some factions within the FBI, were trying to gather information about the
Trump campaign earlier than had been previously reported.
Then there are questions about what
appear to be some fairly substantial government payments to Halper throughout
2016. Halper continues to be listed as a “vendor” by websites that track
payments by the federal government to private contractors.
[…]
Equally strange are the semantic
games which journalists are playing in order to claim that this revelation
disproves, rather than proves, Trump’s allegation that the FBI “spied” on his
campaign.
So, there’s the new line of inquiry. The FBI spy was
investigating something prior to the official start of the counterintelligence
probe. Byron York’s column in The Washington Examiner noted that Trump March
meeting with The Washington Post editorial board is where the FBI
and DOJ probably got the first batch of names to peruse; Trump has
announced that Papadopoulos and Carter Page would be lending a hand:
Trump's announcement did not go
unnoticed at the FBI and Justice Department. The bureau knew Page from a
previous episode in which Russian agents had tried, unsuccessfully, to recruit
him. It's not clear what the FBI knew about the others. But then-Director James
Comey and number-two Andrew McCabe personally briefed Attorney General Loretta
Lynch on the list of newly-named Trump foreign policy advisers, including Page,
according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
Lynch told the House Intelligence Committee
that she, Comey, and McCabe discussed whether to provide a "defensive
briefing" to the Trump campaign. That would entail having an FBI official
meet with a senior campaign official "to alert them to the fact that …
there may be efforts to compromise someone with their campaign," Lynch
said.
It didn't happen, even though it
was discussed again when Comey briefed the National Security Council principals
committee about Page in the "late spring" of 2016, according to
Lynch's testimony. (The principals committee includes some of the
highest-ranking officials in the government, including the secretaries of
State, Treasury, Defense, and Homeland Security, the attorney general, the head
of the CIA, the White House chief of staff, U.N. ambassador, and more.)
So the nation's top political
appointees, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies were watching Trump
campaign figures in the spring and early summer of 2016.
And all of this brings us to a figure that has remained
under the radar in all of this: President Barack Obama. What did he know and
when did he know it because the intelligence apparatus of the U.S. was under
his administration, along with the FBI/DOJ. It’s relevant to bring the former
president and his team under the microscope again. Until then, what we
know via
Larry O’Connor is that a) the Trump campaign was spied on; and
b) the motive was political pending new developments:
First, let’s hope that all
Americans, Left, Right and Never Trump, can agree that this operation was
unprecedented and extraordinary. The FBI has never, as far as we know,
conducted a clandestine investigation on a presidential campaign complete with
electronic surveillance and a spy. The bar to initiate such an investigation
would have to be pretty high. The FBI would not, under normal circumstances,
authorize this kind of operation unless there was extreme and justifiable
reasons to do so.
So, whatever the reason to initiate
this operation, one expects that reason to be pretty concrete and conclusive.
Now, let’s examine the underlying
political atmosphere surrounding the decision to launch this extraordinary,
unprecedented investigation.
Donald Trump was President Obama’s
political enemy. He was running, specifically, to undo Obama’s legacy and
everything he had instituted through executive actions. He was also running
against Obama’s chosen successor.
[…]
We know that the atmosphere
surrounding the decision to launch the investigation was highly political. It
was political in the most personal sense for President Obama, who held the
reigns [sic] of power over the FBI and the DOJ at the time of the
investigation.
We know that the political document
known as the “Steele dossier” was used, at least in part, to justify many
elements of the spying operation against the Trump campaign.
We know that George Popadopoulos’
statement in a bar with an Austrailian [sic] diplomat triggered some element of
the investigation as well.
A guy making a statement in a bar
and a pile of unverified opposition research paid for by the Clinton campaign
doesn’t even come close to the very high bar needed to be cleared to initiate a
clandestine investigation on any American citizen, let alone a member of a
presidential campaign just weeks before election day.
But, it appears, that’s all we have
[…]
Given the politically charged
backdrop of the Obama versus Trump death match, coupled with the use of the
Steele dossier (by definition a political document paid for by Trump’s
political opponent) the only reasonable conclusion to reach is that the FBI
spying operation was launched for political purposes.
And now the wait begins—and it could take years.
++++++++++++++++++
Ex-Trump Aide Comes Forward… Says There’s Second Spy,
Second Intel Agency
Michael Cavuto on Fox News
- Screen Capture of CT Video
One of President Donald Trump’s most explosive claims about
the 2016 election — one that was dismissed out of hand until recently — was
that his campaign was the subject of extensive surveillance.
Now, a former Trump aide is saying something even more explosive:
There wasn’t just a mole inside the Trump campaign, there was a second spy and
intelligence agency.
Michael Caputo is pretty much the definition of a political
lifer. A media strategist, he worked with Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and
various other Republicans. After the fall of the Soviet Union, he began doing
work with the Russians.
This didn’t get the attention of too many people until he
started working for Trump. Much like Carter Page, the low-level Trump campaign
staffer whose ties to Russia became the subject of a million conspiracy
theories, Caputo’s ties to the Russians became of intense interest to the
overzealous FBI people charged with finding some sort of evidence that Trump
was the Siberian Candidate.
Caputo appeared on Fox News just hours after Axios reported “President Trump’s top trade adviser,
Peter Navarro, recommended appointing Stefan Halper, an academic and suspected
FBI informant on the Trump campaign, to a senior role in the Trump
administration.”
That’s bad. According to Caputo, things were even worse.
“Let me tell you something that I know for a fact, this
informant, this person that they planted, that they tried to plant into the
campaign and even into the administration, if you believe Axios — he’s not the
only person that came into the campaign!” Caputo said.
“And the FBI is not the only Obama agency who came into the
campaign,” he added.
“I know because they came at me. And I’m looking for
clearance from my attorney to reveal this to the public. This is just the
beginning and I’ll tell you, when we finally find out the truth about this,
Director Clapper and the rest of them are gonna be wearing some orange suits.”
Orange suits are an unlikely outcome, but
Caputo’s statement indicates that Obama-era surveillance of the Trump campaign
— once dismissed as tinfoil-hattery — might actually be very real.
Of course, Caputo may have a reason to prevaricate about
such things. Kimberley Strassel doesn’t. She’s the Wall Street Journal
writer whose reporting has indicated that she
believes there was an FBI mole inside the campaign.
“The Bureau already has some explaining to do. Thanks to the
Washington Post’s unnamed law-enforcement leakers, we know Mr. Nunes’s request
deals with a ‘top secret intelligence source’ of the FBI and CIA, who is a U.S.
citizen and who was involved in the Russia collusion probe,” she wrote in an
article earlier this month.
“When government agencies refer to sources, they mean people
who appear to be average citizens but use their profession or contacts to spy
for the agency. Ergo, we might take this to mean that the FBI secretly had a
person on the payroll who used his or her non-FBI credentials to interact in
some capacity with the Trump campaign.
“This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting,”
she added. “It would also be a major escalation from the electronic
surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough.”
During and after the campaign, Trump’s claims that he was
surveilled (and that the surveillance was politically-motivated) were dismissed
as baseless fantasies, yet another sign this was an unbalanced person who
shouldn’t be normalized or believed.
And yet, here we are, weeks away from the inspector general’s report on the Clinton
investigation, which doesn’t sound like it’s going to simply be the pro forma
postmortem it normally would be, considering it involved a losing campaign. The
report is expected to detail a whole host of tactics by the “deep state” that
could easily be construed as being in service of the Clinton campaign and to
the detriment of the Trump campaign.
If Caputo is telling the truth, this means there’s a whole
host of issues here. Who was involved? The DOJ and FBI, obviously, but the CIA
too? Other agencies under the aegis of the ODNI?
I can predict just one thing: Things are about to get very
interesting for everyone who called Trump crazy when he talked about
surveillance.
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our
stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting
mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends,
however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and
consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
____________________
Hold On, The FBI Was
Spying On The Trump Campaign *Before* The Counterintelligence Probe Officially
Started?
Townhall.com
is the leading source for conservative news and
political commentary and analysis.
Copyright © Townhall.com. All Rights Reserved.
_______________________
Ex-Trump Aide Comes
Forward… Says There’s Second Spy, Second Intel Agency
No comments:
Post a Comment