© May 2, 2018
Paul Sutliff alerted me of a Pegida
Canada event he was speaking at in Toronto on March 28. Paul
linked me to a VladTepesBlog video at BitChute.
Paul’s email is dated 4/28/2018 7:37 PM. The email went to several others on
his contact list. I know this because several must hit reply to all which
included me. All those email replies rightly patted Paul on the back for his
efforts and one person provided Facebook links of the BitChute video.
So what’s the big deal?
Paul Sutliff marched with Pegida Canada to the venue where
he was one of the speakers. In the process of marching Antifa was waiting to
commit acts of violence against the Pegida march. Indeed, Antifa not only
attacked Pegida and Paul Sutliff AND the Canadian Police (I think Toronto Police)
that was there in force anticipating Antifa violent shenanigans.
You can hear Paul cheering the police as they protected
Pegida Canada from the Communist anarchists known as Antifa. The video is
nearly a half an hour long. As such I can’t upload it to my Youtube channel
because they only let me up 10-minute videos. I am trying to upload it to my
Facebook page, but I just got a message from Facebook telling me:
“The video in your post is
being processed. We'll send you a notification when it's done and your post is
ready to view.”
Amazingly, Facebook followed through with posting the video.
I’m not holding my breath that Facebook censors remove the video or the entire
post altogether.
If the video shows up below, it was processed meaning
approved. Facebook censor wrath may kick in. If not, here’s the VladTepesBlog link to view the video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/iFYk83PbhYIO/
The Facebook/VladTepesBlog video does not show Paul
Sutliff’s speech. Paul has posted that on his own blog – Paul
Sutliff on Civilization Jihad. The post is entitled, “PEGIDA Canada stands strong in Toronto and
watches the police take down Antifa”.
At this point you should have a bit of awareness of what the
Pegida Movement is and have an understanding of Antifa Communism.
Pegida is an international movement that first appeared in
Germany as a protest against culture-clashing Muslim refugees which too often
brought Muslim thinking about violence and rape against non-Muslims. The Multiculturalist
Left is committed to dissipating their own culture by promoting massive Muslim
immigration into Germany and other Western nations.
The Pegida Movement has spread like wildfire among European
Union (EU) nations and non-EU European nations. In Multicultural Leftist Europe,
anything or anyone that promotes the preservation of Western Culture by
preventing people from cultures that clash with Western principles are labelled
as Far Right. Since many people believe nationalist movements of the past
(primarily Nazism and Fascism) to be Far Right. However, Nazis and Fascists are
an element of Socialism that employed nationalist extremism to justify their
form of Socialism (Mises Institute):
My purpose today is to make just
two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a
capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system
based on government ownership of the means of
production, positively requires a
totalitarian dictatorship.
…
When one remembers that the word
"Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der National sozialistische Deutsche
Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German
Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy.
For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party
with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
…
The basis of the claim that Nazi
Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany
appeared to be left in private hands.
What Mises identified was that
private ownership of the means of production existed in name only
under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production
resided in the German government. For it was the German government and
not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive
powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was
to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be
distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be
paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be
permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed,
was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
De facto government
ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied
by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the
common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means
to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the
State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State,
his property is also owned by the State.
…
Of course, socialism does not end
the chaos caused by the destruction of the price system. It perpetuates it. And
if it is introduced without the prior existence of price controls, its effect
is to inaugurate that very chaos. This is because socialism is not actually a
positive economic system. It is merely the negation of capitalism and its price
system. As such, the essential nature of socialism is one and the same as the
economic chaos resulting from the destruction of the price system by price and
wage controls. (I want to point out that Bolshevik-style socialism's imposition
of a system of production quotas, with incentives everywhere to exceed the
quotas, is a sure formula for universal shortages, just as exist under all
around price and wage controls.)
…
The requirements of enforcing a
system of price and wage controls shed major light on the totalitarian nature
of socialism — most obviously, of course, on that of the German or Nazi variant
of socialism, but also on that of Soviet-style socialism as well.
…
Now against whom would it be more
logical for the citizens of a socialist state to direct their resentment and
hostility than against that very socialist state itself? The same socialist
state which has proclaimed its responsibility for their life, has promised them
a life of bliss, and which in fact is responsible for giving
them a life of hell. Indeed, the leaders of a socialist state live in a further
dilemma, in that they daily encourage the people to believe that socialism is a
perfect system whose bad results can only be the work of evil men. If that were
true, who in reason could those evil men be but the rulers themselves, who
have not only made life a hell, but have perverted an allegedly perfect system
to do it?
It follows that the rulers of a
socialist state must live in terror of the people. By the logic of their
actions and their teachings, the boiling, seething resentment of the people
should … READ
ENTIRETY (Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is
Totalitarian; By George Reisman; Mises Institute;
11/11/2005)
Socialism is Leftist, and Nazism is a form of Socialism.
Ergo, it is a bit deceptive to label Pegida – an anti-immigration
preserve-Western culture movement – a Far Right organization. Unfortunately, too
many associated with Pegida does have a sympathetic eye toward Nazism. One
thing is certain about Nazism, it takes nationalism to racial superiority. One
of the originators – Lutz Bachmann - of the German Pegida Movement was caught
dressing up like Adolf Hitler in full Nazi regalia. Rather than blight the
intent of the Pegida Movement Bachmann resigned his Pegida position in
2015. Although Pegida Germany has dwindled since its 2015 heyday, a
resurgence seems to be occurring
despite Bachmann’s association.
The existence of Muslim violence against Europeans growing and
has inspired more Europeans to take a greater interest in their national
culture. After all, the English translation for the acronym “PEGIDA” is Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West”:
Patriotic Europeans Against the
Islamisation of the West (Occident) (German: Patriotische Europäer gegen die
Islamisierung des Abendlandes), abbreviated PEGIDA or Pegida,
is a German nationalist, anti-Islam, right-wing political
movement.[3][4] It was founded in Dresden in October 2014. Pegida believes that Germany is
being increasingly Islamicised[5] and aims to
oppose Islamic
extremism.
Pegida wants to curb immigration,
and accuses authorities of not enforcing existing immigration laws.[6] Pegida has held many demonstrations; often there
have been many public demonstrations against them as well.[7] In 2015, the founder of Pegida resigned after
being reported as having posed as Adolf Hitler and having made racist
statements on Facebook.[8] He was later reinstated.[9]
Offshoots of Pegida have been
formed in various countries.
Now let’s look at Antifa.
Antifa’s European origins begin of all places in Germany:
…
The organization was initially part
of the Soviet Union’s front operations to bring about communist dictatorship in
Germany, and it worked to label all rival parties as “fascist.”
The organization can be traced to
the “united front” of the Soviet Union’s Communist International (Comintern)
during the Third World Congress in Moscow in June and July 1921, according
to the German booklet “80 Years of
Anti-Fascist Action” by Bernd Langer, published by the Association for the
Promotion of Anti-Fascist Culture. Langer is a former member of the Autonome
Antifa, formerly one of Germany’s largest Antifa organizations, which disbanded
in 2004.
The Soviet Union was
among the world’s most violent dictatorships, killing an estimated 20 million
people, according to “The Black Book of Communism,” published by Harvard
University Press. The Soviet regime is second only to the Chinese
Communist Party under Mao Zedong, which killed an estimated 65 million people.
…
The idea of the united front
strategy was to bring together left-wing organizations in order to incite
communist revolution. The Soviets believed that following Russia’s revolution
in 1917, communism would next spread to Germany, since Germany had the
second-largest communist party, the KPD (Communist Party of Germany).
…
“The ‘unified front’ thus did not
mean an equal cooperation between different organizations, but the dominance of
the workers’ movement by the communists,” Langer writes.
…
Both the communist and fascist
systems were based in collectivism and state-planned economies. Both also
proposed systems wherein the individual was heavily controlled by a
powerful state, and both were responsible for large-scale atrocities and
genocide.
The 2016 annual report by
Germany’s domestic intelligence service, the Federal Office for the Protection
of the Constitution (BfV), notes the same point: From the viewpoint of the
“left-wing extremist,” the label of “fascism” as pushed by Antifa often does
not refer to actual fascism, but is merely a label assigned to “capitalism.”
… READ
ENTIRETY (The Communist Origins of the Antifa Extremist Group;
By Joshua Philipp; The Epoch Times; 8/18/17 1:20 pm – Updated 2/8/18 11:51
am)
Antifa has come to America to oppose the American way of
life with Communist thuggery:
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Police
across the United States are being forced to deal with a new hard-Left,
communist-derived movement organized under the code word “Antifa,” standing for
“Anti-Fascist.”
The violent, confrontational nature
of Antifa anarchists presents a challenge to U.S. law enforcement that is
unprecedented; they reject the free speech principles upon which civil
discourse depends, while seeking to achieve the demise of the U.S.
Constitution, as it holds as illegitimate any compromise with their communist
worldview.
…
The Antifa movement in the U.S. is
a return to the communist paramilitary riot tactics developed to fight the
Brownshirts of the Weimar Republic. The goal was to terrorize middle-class
Germans into rejecting the Nazis who had embraced the social-welfare programs
of prior regimes. Today, few except professional historians realize Germany was
the first country in the world to introduce government-funded universal
healthcare. This was part of Chancellor Otto von Bismarck’s “anti-socialist”
legislation, adopted under the theory that a little socialism would prevent the
German people from embracing a more virulent form of socialism.
…
Today, the Antifa movement that
originally formed in Germany in the 1930s has taken root in the United States,
with the goal of rubbing raw social and racial class tensions in order to
delegitimize the U.S. Constitution, bring down the Trump administration, and
cause the political chaos the Antifa movement believes will lead to the
creation of a communist state here in the U.S.A.
Antifa Street-thug Insurrection
Tactics
On January 20, Antifa thugs
— most dressed in black from head to toe and wearing masks or bandannas
hiding their faces -- launched violent street protests in Washington, D.C., in
an attempt to “shut down” Donald Trump’s inauguration.
In what was branded as a
“DisruptJ20” protest, some 1,000 Antifa thugs broke windows at Starbucks,
McDonald’s, and Bank of America, as well as in commercial buildings in downtown
Washington. Antifa rioters flooded streets, blocked traffic, burned trash in
the streets, and broke windshields of passing cars. They threatened to attack
inauguration attendees on the streets, while shouting a continuous flow of
angry, vulgar, and confrontational in-your-face insults.
…
The Antifa movement would like
nothing better than an uprising of white-supremacist, far-right extremists to
oppose them in fist fights.
But the truth is that in the United
States, the majority of conservatives and libertarians voting for Trump are not
white supremacists any more than they are far-Right extremists. The numbers of
actual far-right extremists remain so relatively small that Antifa radicals are
unlikely to destabilize or delegitimize the Trump presidency, regardless of how
hopeful the far-Left remains. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are not Joseph
Goebbels, regardless of how Tom Perez and Bernie Sanders characterize the
voices on the political Right supporting Trump.
But the numbers of Antifa criminal
protesters will grow, championed by leftist politicians that 1960s voters would
fail to recognize as true supporters of the Constitution.
For the near-term future, we should
expect the Antifa movement to remain a street-thug problem for riot-trained law
enforcement units; it will continue to grow in numbers and in violent intensity
as the Democratic Party further radicalizes and embraces communist ideals, and
as the 2018 mid-term elections draw near. – READ
ENTIRETY (How the Violent Hard-Left “Antifa” Movement Copies
Communists in Weimar Republic Germany; By Jerome R. Corsi; New American; 8/15/17)
This is the hatred Antifa cowards acted out on Paul Sutliff
and Pegida Canada.
JRH 5/2/18
No comments:
Post a Comment