Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© October 25, 2022
UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030, Cub of Rome and so on. These
are scenarios relegated for decades as Conspiracy Theories that calling the
critics of these despotic agendas nutcases. HOWEVER! The so-called Great Reset
empowered by a planned pandemic virus (that could have been easily
vanquished with vilified inexpensive therapeutics) is the Globalist
New/One World Order in action ending Individual Liberty, forcibly decreasing
the world’s population and ending the sovereignty of individual nations.
To what end?
I found this video of Yuval
Noah Harari speaking of an Ark to preserve the Elite while masses
drown on Telegram (FrankSpeech Channel - https://t.me/frankspeechdotcom_channel/30953):
Bitchute VIDEO: YUVAL'S ARK VIDEO
To empower the Global wealthy Elitist Left to control the
masses according to the whims and desires of those Elites. Essentially it is
the new Master (Globalist-Leftist-Elites) and Slave (impoverished by
policy of dependence) order.
The vehicle of control is an odd combination
Corporatist-Fascist-Marxism with a transhumanist technocracy controlling lever.
In America the integrity (or lack thereof) of the 2022 and 2024
Elections just might be the measuring stick if this snowball of tyranny can be
vanquished peacefully. If November 2022 and 2024 are as corrupt or more so than
the 2020 Election cycle, a massive uprising might be the last great hope for
Individual Liberty. If the Election is corrupt and too many Sheeple exist for
an uprising, THEN the only hope is the return of Jesus.
F. William Engdahl’s “The Dark Origins of the Davos Great
Reset” is a great mini-history explains how we got to today’s seemingly expanding
tyranny.
JRH 10/25/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I need your
generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
******************************
The Dark Origins of the Davos Great Reset
World
Economic Forum-Great Reset
October 24, 2022
Book by F. William Engdahl: “Full
Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order Paperback
– October 10, 2009”
Important to understand is that there is not one single new
or original idea in Klaus Schwab’s so-called Great Reset agenda for the world.
Nor is his Fourth Industrial Revolution agenda his or his claim to having
invented the notion of Stakeholder Capitalism a product of Schwab. Klaus Schwab
is little more than a slick PR agent for a global technocratic agenda, a
corporatist unity of corporate power with government, including the UN, an
agenda whose origins go back to the beginning of the 1970s, and even earlier.
The Davos Great reset is merely an updated blueprint for a global dystopian dictatorship
under UN control that has been decades in development. The key actors were
David Rockefeller and his protégé, Maurice Strong.
In the beginning of the 1970s, there was arguably no one
person more influential in world politics than the late David Rockefeller, then
largely known as chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank.
Creating the new paradigm
At the end of the 1960s and into the early 1970s, the
international circles directly tied to David Rockefeller launched a dazzling
array of elite organizations and think tanks. These included The Club of Rome;
the 1001: A Nature Trust, tied to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF); the Stockholm
United Nations Earth Day conference; the MIT-authored study, Limits to Growth;
and David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission.
Club of Rome
In 1968 David Rockefeller founded a neo-Malthusian think
tank, The Club of Rome, along with Aurelio
Peccei and Alexander
King. Aurelio Peccei, was a senior manager of the Fiat car
company, owned by the powerful Italian Agnelli family. Fiat’s Gianni
Agnelli was an intimate friend of David Rockefeller and a
member of the International Advisory Committee of Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan
Bank. Agnelli and David Rockefeller had been close friends since 1957. Agnelli
became a founding member of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission in 1973.
Alexander King, head of the OECD Science Program was also a consultant to NATO.
That was the beginning of what would become the neo-Malthusian “people pollute”
movement.
In 1971 the Club of Rome published a deeply-flawed
report, Limits to
Growth, which predicted an end to civilization as we knew it
because of rapid population growth, combined with fixed resources such as oil.
The report concluded that without substantial changes in resource consumption,
“the most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in
both population and industrial capacity.” It was based on bogus computer
simulations by a group of MIT computer scientists. It stated the bold
prediction, “If the present growth trends in world population,
industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue
unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within
the next one hundred years.” That was 1971. In 1973 Klaus Schwab in his third
annual Davos business leader meeting invited Peccei to Davos to present Limits
to Growth to assembled corporate CEOs.
In 1974, the Club of Rome declared
boldly, “The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.” Then: “the
world is facing an unprecedented set of interlocking global problems, such as,
over-population, food shortages, non-renewable resource [oil-w.e.] depletion,
environmental degradation and poor governance.” They
argued that,
‘horizontal’ restructuring of
the world system is needed…drastic changes in the norm stratum – that is, in
the value system and the goals of man – are necessary in order to solve energy,
food, and other crises, i.e., social changes and changes in individual
attitudes are needed if the transition to organic growth is to take place.
In their 1974 report, Mankind
at the Turning Point, The Club of Rome further argued:
Increasing interdependence
between nations and regions must then translate as a decrease in independence.
Nations cannot be interdependent without each of them giving up some of, or at
least acknowledging limits to, its own independence. Now is the time to draw up
a master plan for organic sustainable growth and world development based on
global allocation of all finite resources and a new global economic system.
That was the early formulation of the UN Agenda 21,
Agenda2030 and the 2020 Davos Great Reset.
David Rockefeller and Maurice Strong
By far the most influential organizer of Rockefeller’s ‘zero
growth’ agenda in the early 1970s was David Rockefeller’s longtime friend, a
billionaire oilman named Maurice Strong. Canadian
Maurice Strong was one of the key early propagators of the scientifically
fraudulent theory that man-made CO2 emissions from transportation vehicles,
coal plants and agriculture caused a dramatic and accelerating global
temperature rise which threatens “the planet”, so-called Global Warming.
As chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm Conference,
Strong promoted an agenda of population reduction and lowering of living
standards around the world to “save the environment.” Strong
stated his radical ecologist agenda: “Isn’t the only hope for
the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our
responsibility to bring that about?” This is what is now taking place under
cover of a hyped global pandemic.
Strong was a curious choice to head a major UN initiative to
mobilize action on the environment, as his career and his considerable fortune had
been built on exploitation of oil, like an unusual number of the new advocates
of ‘ecological purity,’ such as David Rockefeller or Robert O. Anderson of
Aspen Institute or Shell’s John Loudon.
Strong had met David Rockefeller in 1947 as a young Canadian
high school dropout of eighteen and from that point, his career became tied to
the network of the Rockefeller family. Through his new friendship with David
Rockefeller, Strong, at age 18, was given a key UN position under UN
Treasurer, Noah Monod. The UN’s funds were conveniently enough
handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank. This was typical of the model of
“public-private partnership” to be deployed by Strong—private gain from public
government.
In the 1960s Strong had become president of the huge
Montreal energy conglomerate and oil company known as Power Corporation, then
owned by the influential Paul Desmarais. Power Corporation was reportedly also
used as a political slush fund to finance campaigns of select Canadian
politicians such as Pierre Trudeau, father of Davos protégé Justin Trudeau,
according to Canadian investigative researcher, Elaine Dewar (Elaine Dewar, op
cit. p. 269-271. )
Earth Summit I and Rio Earth Summit
By 1971 Strong was named Undersecretary of the United
Nations in New York and Secretary General of the upcoming Earth Day conference,
United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Earth Summit I) in
Stockholm, Sweden. He was also named that year as a trustee of the Rockefeller
Foundation – who financed his launch of the Stockholm Earth Day project (Elaine
Dewar, op cit. p.277). In Stockholm the United Nations Environment Program
(UNEP) was created with Strong as its head.
By 1989 Strong was named by the UN Secretary General to head
the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development or UNCED (“Rio Earth
Summit II”). He oversaw the drafting of the UN “Sustainable Environment” goals
there, the Agenda 21 for Sustainable Development that forms the basis of Klaus
Schwab’s Great Reset, as well as creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) of the UN. Strong, who was also a board member of Davos WEF,
had arranged for Schwab to serve as a key adviser to the Rio Earth Summit.
As Secretary General of the UN Rio Conference, Strong also
commissioned a report from the Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution,
authored by Alexander King which admitted that the CO2 global warming claim was
merely an
invented ruse to force change:
“The common enemy of humanity is
man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that
pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like
would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it
is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The
real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
President Clinton’s delegate to Rio, Tim
Wirth, admitted the same, stating, “We have got to ride the
global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be
doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”
(Elaine Dewar, Cloak of Green: The Links between key environmental groups,
government and big business, Toronto, James Lorimer & Co., 1995, pp.
259-265. )
At Rio Strong first introduced the manipulative idea of
“sustainable society” defined in relation this arbitrary goal of eliminating
CO2 and other so-called Greenhouse Gases. Agenda 21 became Agenda 2030 in Sept
2015 in Rome, with the Pope’s blessing, with 17 “sustainable” goals. It
declared among other items,
“Land, because of its unique
nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlement, cannot be treated as
an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and
inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership also is a principal
instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore
contributes to social injustice…Social justice, urban renewal, and development,
the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can
only ‘be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.”
In short private land ownership must become socialized for
“society as a whole,” an idea well-known in Soviet Union days, and a key part
of the Davos Great Reset.
At Rio in 1992 where he was chairman and General
Secretary, Strong
declared:
It is clear that current
lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high
meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience
foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work
place air-conditioning, and suburban housing —
are not sustainable. (emphasis added)
Strong did not heed his own call. What Strong did not tell
his environmentalist allies at Rio was that he had also made a huge purchase of
the Colorado Land and Cattle Company, from Saudi arms dealer and CIA asset,
Adnan Khashoggi.
By that time Strong was at the very center of the
transformation of the UN into the vehicle for imposing a new global
technocratic fascism by stealth, using dire warnings of planet extinction and
global warming, merging government agencies with corporate power in an
unelected control of pretty much everything, under the fraudulent cover of
“sustainability.” In 1997 Strong oversaw creation of the action plan following
the Earth Summit, The
Global Diversity Assessment, a blueprint for the roll out of a
Fourth Industrial Revolution, an inventory of every resource on the planet, how
it would be controlled , and how this revolution would be achieved.
At this time Strong was co-chairman of Klaus Schwab’s Davos
World Economic Forum. In 2015 on Strong’s death, Davos founder Klaus
Schwab wrote, “He was my mentor since the creation of the Forum: a
great friend; an indispensable advisor; and, for many years, a member of our
Foundation Board.”
Before he was forced to leave the UN in disgrace over an
Iraq food-for-oil corruption scandal, Strong was member of the Club of Rome,
Trustee of the Aspen Institute, Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and
Rothschild Foundation. Strong was
also a director of the occult Temple of Understanding of the
Lucifer Trust (aka Lucis Trust) housed at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine
in New York City, “where pagan rituals include escorting sheep and cattle to
the alter for blessing. Here, Vice President Al Gore delivered a sermon, as
worshippers marched to the altar with bowls of compost and worms…”
This is the dark origin of Schwab’s Great Reset agenda,
where we should eat worms and have no private property in order to “save the
planet.” The agenda is dark, dystopian and meant to eliminate billions of us
“ordinary humans.”
Source: Global Research via Truth
Unmuted
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine Global Research Centre for Research on Globalization
ACTIVIST POST - ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT NEWS - CREATIVE COMMONS 2019
%20&%20Wheel%20of%20mRNA%20Injury%20toon%20(Garrison).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
