DONATE

Showing posts with label mRNA Deception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mRNA Deception. Show all posts

Friday, October 2, 2026

Florida AG Sues Pfizer Over mRNA Deception

An Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

Intro © October 2, 2026

 


I’ve read Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier is conducting a civil suit against Pfizer and its CEO Albert Bourla for knowingly misrepresenting the safety and effectiveness of its mRNA Jab during the COVID Tyranny.

 

I say, “GO FLORIDA!”

 

And yet I have a suspicion Big Pharma – including Pfizer – will rally their corrupt politicians and a corrupt Federal Judiciary to quash the sovereign State of Florida (as AGAIN ignoring the 10th Amendment) in the State’s ability to protect Florida citizens.

 

On the other hand, perhaps an ultimate legal SCOTUS miracle will arise affirming Florida’s 10th Amendment sovereign rights and Pfizer gets spanked in State Court. Just think of the slew of Red-State Courts taking the precedent to sovereignly protect their State citizens from the heinous greed of Big Pharma. I suspect this is litigation that eventually land on the SCOTUS Docket probably after the Trump Administration ends its term of Office.

 

I’m cross post the Florida lawsuit details from The Exposé and Substack’s FOCAL POINTS. But for a brief synopsis take a look at Bob Unruh’s post at WND: “'Deceptively marketing the products as safe': Pfizer sued for deceiving public about COVID shots: Allegations from state attorney general are that company profited while refusing to disclose serious risks”.

 

JRH 10/2/26

ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income. Diana & I endorse Magic Functional Coffee and Matcha Tea. It’s MAGIC because there is a weight loss or weight control emphasis among other wellbeing benefits.  Clicking the Diana Wellness Store will take you to the online store. CLICK  or SCROLL to the BUY tab (Agara Coffee or Agara Matcha Tea). DRINK COFFEE or MATCHA:

 

https://dianawellnessstore.com

*************************

Florida Attorney General files lawsuit against Pfizer for deceptive practices relating to its covid “vaccine”

Featured image: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announcing lawsuit against Pfizer and its CEO. (The Exposé PHOTO)

 

Posted by Rhoda Wilson

October 2, 2026

THE EXPOSÉ

 

Yesterday, 1 October 2026, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a lawsuit against Pfizer and its CEO Albert Bourla, alleging the company violated Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

 

The complaint claims Pfizer deceptively marketed its covid vaccine as safe while concealing known risks, including myocarditis and dangers to pregnant women.

 

“Weeks ago, we learned Fauci and the biomedical state knew the covid jabs were dangerous but hid it from us. While that investigation continues, today we sued Pfizer for deceptively marketing the products as safe- making billions -while pregnant women were miscarrying their babies and teenagers were having heart attacks,” Uthmeier said in a tweet.

 

Pfizer’s Vaccine Messaging Heads to Court in Florida

By RVM News

 

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced a lawsuit against Pfizer and CEO Albert Bourla, accusing the company of deceptive practices involving the marketing and safety claims surrounding its mRNA covid-19 vaccine.

 

Uthmeier said Pfizer presented mass vaccination as necessary to stop the spread of covid-19 while assuring the public that there were no significant safety concerns.  “Pfizer told Florida families that mass vaccination with their mRNA covid vaccine was necessary to stop the spread, and that there were no material safety risks,” Uthmeier said.

 

He specifically pointed to comments from Bourla that, according to Uthmeier, pressured people to take the vaccine by suggesting they would otherwise endanger those closest to them.  “CEO Albert Bourla said, ‘If you didn’t take it, you were putting the people you love the most at risk. He called people who asked questions criminals,” Uthmeier said.

 

The attorney general also criticised Pfizer’s public statements about potential safety concerns following the widespread distribution of the vaccine. “In January 2023, after billions of doses, he said Pfizer had not seen a single safety signal,” Uthmeier said.

 

Uthmeier argued that Pfizer had enormous financial incentives surrounding the vaccine and spent heavily on advertising while generating tens of billions of dollars from sales.  “They spent 10 billion dollars on advertising. They brought in more than 80 billion from the vaccine alone,” Uthmeier said.

 

At the centre of Florida’s allegations is Uthmeier’s claim that the company failed to adequately disclose information about potential risks.  “What they didn’t say was that they knew about myocarditis in teenagers and young adults,” Uthmeier said.

 

He further claimed that Pfizer had received thousands of reports involving adverse events.  “They had reports of 1,000s of adverse events, including stroke and death, and they had reason to know the shot posed risks to pregnant women and unborn babies in the first trimester,” Uthmeier said.

 

Uthmeier also referenced information he said was recently revealed by Senators Rand Paul and Ron Johnson involving Dr. Anthony Fauci and concerns about pregnancy.  “Recently, Senators Paul and Johnson revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci texted that the second dose theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the first trimester,” Uthmeier said.

 

According to Uthmeier, other federal health officials were aware of the discussion while pregnant women continued to be told that vaccination was safe.  “The CDC director and the Surgeon General agreed, but pregnant women, nevertheless, were told it was safe,” Uthmeier said.

 

The Florida attorney general also alleged that Pfizer had not established whether the vaccine prevented transmission before making claims about the broader public-health benefits of vaccination.  “Pfizer hadn’t even tested whether the vaccine stopped transmission,” Uthmeier said.

 

He said those allegations form the basis of the state’s lawsuit against Pfizer and Borla.  “That’s why we filed a lawsuit today against Pfizer and Albert Borla for their deceptive practices; what they did was wrong,” Uthmeier said.

 

Uthmeier framed the legal action as an effort to challenge what he described as a failure to provide Florida families with complete information about the vaccine.  “They assumed Florida families could not be trusted with the truth. Well, we disagree,” Uthmeier said.

 

He concluded by promising that his office would pursue accountability through the lawsuit.  “My office will hold them accountable. Thank you.”

 

Watch Uthmeier’s video statement below:

 

Rumble VIDEO: Pfizer’s Vaccine Messaging Heads to Court in Florida

 

[Posted by Talk Red

Published October 2, 2026

…MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE

SUPPORT THE EXPOSÉ

 

+++++++++++++++++

BREAKING: Florida’s Attorney General SUES Pfizer and Albert Bourla for HIDING COVID Shot Deaths, Heart Damage, Miscarriages, and Strokes

The lawsuit alleges Pfizer hid safety signals, misled millions about transmission, and used deceptive marketing to drive maximum COVID shot uptake

 

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

October 1, 2026

FOCAL POINTS

 

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH on X

 

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed a sweeping lawsuit against Pfizer and its CEO, Albert Bourla, accusing them of deceiving the public about the safety and transmission-prevention capabilities of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA injection.

 

The 49-page complaint was filed on October 1, 2026, in St. Lucie County, Florida, and targets Pfizer and Bourla personally under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

 

The complaint opens with a striking line: “Those people are criminals.” That is how Bourla described people who publicly raised safety concerns about Pfizer’s COVID-19 injection.

 

At the center of the case is an explosive allegation: Pfizer publicly assured Americans that its COVID shot was safe while the company possessed internal and external safety information involving myocarditis, miscarriages, strokes, adverse events, and deaths.

Florida Sues Pfizer & Bourla (FOCAL POINTS PHOTO)

 

158,893 adverse events in just 10 weeks

 

According to the complaint, Pfizer’s own adverse-event database contained 158,893 adverse events from 42,086 case reports by February 28, 2021—only about 10 weeks after the vaccine received emergency authorization.

 

Yet in January 2023, Bourla publicly stated that Pfizer had seen “not a single [safety] signal” despite billions of doses having been administered.

 

Florida argues that statement was fundamentally incompatible with information already known about myocarditis and pericarditis.

 

1,223 reported deaths

 

The complaint also states that Pfizer’s database contained 1,223 reported fatalities following vaccination as of February 28, 2021.

 

Florida argues that the existence of this volume of serious adverse-event information undermined Pfizer’s sweeping public safety messaging.

 

The volume of reports became so large, according to the filing, that Pfizer hired 600 additional full-time employees and expected to hire another 1,800 workers to process adverse-event reports.

 

Pregnancy and miscarriages

 

Another major section of the lawsuit concerns pregnancy.

 

The complaint states that by February 28, 2021, Pfizer had reports involving 458 pregnant women exposed to its COVID vaccine. Of those reports, 248 involved an adverse event and 52 involved miscarriage, according to the filing. Nearly all of the reported miscarriages occurred during the first trimester.

 

The lawsuit also points to Pfizer’s planned clinical trial involving pregnant women.

 

Pfizer initially sought approximately 4,000 participants, but the complaint states that only 348 mothers and 335 infants were ultimately enrolled and that the study was terminated early. The women vaccinated in that study were 24–34 weeks pregnant, meaning the trial did not directly provide first-trimester vaccination data.

 

The complaint further cites the Comirnaty package insert as stating that there are no available data on use before 24 weeks sufficient to inform risks for major birth defects and miscarriage.

 

Pfizer pushed transmission claims without testing transmission

 

The second enormous pillar of Florida’s case concerns transmission. Pfizer and Bourla repeatedly told the public that vaccination would protect other people.

 

In December 2021, for example, Pfizer said that getting as many people vaccinated and boosted as possible remained the best course of action to “prevent the spread of COVID-19.”

 

But according to the complaint, Pfizer’s pivotal clinical trial did not test whether vaccination prevented person-to-person transmission.

 

The FDA itself stated in December 2020 that there was no evidence at that time that the vaccine prevented SARS-CoV-2 transmission from one person to another, and transmission was not an objective of Pfizer’s trial protocol.

 

A Pfizer executive later publicly acknowledged that the vaccine had not been tested for stopping transmission before entering the market.

 

Florida alleges that Pfizer nevertheless used the idea of protecting loved ones as a powerful marketing tool to increase vaccine uptake.

 

More than $80 BILLION in COVID vaccine revenue

 

The financial stakes were enormous. The complaint states that Pfizer turned approximately $1.5 billion in research and development spending into more than $80 billion in COVID vaccine revenue.

 

Pfizer’s vaccine captured nearly 70% of the U.S. and European COVID vaccine markets, according to figures cited in the complaint.

 

Meanwhile, Bourla received approximately $101.8 million in compensation from Pfizer between 2020 and 2023.

 

Florida’s complaint goes beyond safety claims and accuses Pfizer of engaging in broader unfair business practices to dominate the COVID vaccine market.

 

Florida wants the money back

 

Florida is seeking far more than a symbolic judgment. The Attorney General is asking the court for civil penalties, a permanent injunction against deceptive or unfair representations concerning Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, attorneys’ fees and other relief.

 

Most significantly, Florida is also seeking disgorgement—legal language meaning Pfizer could be forced to hand back profits connected to conduct the court ultimately determines violated Florida law.

 

Finally, a government is attempting to hold Pfizer and Albert Bourla accountable by at least some degree for their gross deception.

 

For years, the company’s false safety and transmission claims helped drive mass vaccine uptake. Now those fraudulent claims are headed to court.

 

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

 

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

 

Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org

 

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

 

© 2026 Peter McCullough MD MPH

FOCAL POINTS HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT FOCAL POINTS

Thursday, February 22, 2024

Become AWARE of the Medical Tyranny Lies Misleading YOU

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 22, 2024

 

On Telegram I subscribe to Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel. On 2/20/24 he recommended listening to an interview between Sasha Latypova and a gal I only know as Elizabeth on Rumble. Even if your attention span is strained, YOU should watch that interview, it will be an 1:25:11-hour that will educate on the lies the Mainstream, Government and Big Pharma have disseminated about the CCP-Virus (aka COVID) AND the deception being revealed more and more about the mRNA Jab (and boosters).

 

I’m cross posting a Substack post from Exposing The Darkness which roughly picks up the Yeadon message from Telegram. THEN the Rumble video (the video-Description is a great summary) of the Latypova interview. AND A BONUS: Although unrelated to the Latypova video, I’m cross posting a Substack Reese Report focusing on Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea research on mRNA Shedding that should disturb you. The Substack post has a 5:11-Minute video and a video-transcript, ALL WORTH taking a look.

 

JRH 2/22/24

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**********************

Dr. Mike Yeadon Comments on “Lead Me in Your Truth”- an Interview With Sasha Latypova

"She speculates that transfecting recipients via circular bacterial plasmid DNA was always the objective...the mRNA narrative was chosen to fool most healthcare and pharma R&D people"

 

Dr. Mike Yeadon (Exposing The Darkness Photo)

 

By LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY

FEB 20, 2024

Exposing The Darkness

 

By Dr. Michael Yeadon February 20, 2024

 

I confess that I rarely watch lengthy interviews these days.

 

While there’s often something I’d not heard before, the frequency with which I learn something that’s both new AND important is now too low to justify the amount of time consumed in the hope of gems.

 

However, I’d not listened to an interview with Sasha Latypova because she’s already given many, thorough interviews. This one I recommend a listen.

 

She’s made a deduction that I’d missed. If you’re short on time, 44min onwards contains some ideas new to me.

 

It doesn’t change anything much except for the anticipated duration of toxicity, if you were affected, post-injection.

 

She speculates that transfecting recipients via circular bacterial plasmid DNA was always the objective & that the mRNA narrative was chosen as more likely to fool even most healthcare and pharma R&D people.

 

That detail aside, this interview is typically full of well supported statements. Good for Advanced Level conspiracy realists.

 

Best wishes,

Mike

 

LINK TO RUMBLE VIDEO


 

© 2024 Lioness of Judah

Exposing The Darkness HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Exposing The Darkness

 

++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: "Lead me in your truth"- An interview with Sasha Latypova

Posted by RefugeOfSinners

Published February 19, 2024

 

Sasha Latypova holds a graduate degree in business from Dartmouth College and is a retired pharmaceutical industry, research and development executive with 25 years of experience in conducting clinical trials.

 

In this episode, we discuss the following:

 

- Sasha did not work for a pharmaceutical company, she contracted to pharma companies. She conducted clinical trials in imaging, and later in cardiovascular safety monitoring. Most companies now outsource their clinical trials to contractors, like Sasha. So, Sasha was responsible for being in compliance to the regulators at all times, when conducting these trials. She is aware of all the regulations.

 

- Sasha retired from her work in the pharmaceutical industry before the Covid19 period began. We discuss why she became interested in the Covid situation, both the early treatment and the new vaccines.

 

- Sasha first became suspicious when the public health officials started to suppress hydroxychloroquine, as she had experience with this drug. They tried to smear this drug with cardiovascular arrythmia, which she was familiar with in her previous work. She knew for sure that hydroxychloroquine did not have that problem, especially when take for a short time frame, as it was for Covid.

 

- She was the first to notice the batch variability of Covid vaccine adverse events in VAERS. Sasha collaborated with Craig Paardekooper on the website “How bad is my batch”. She knew right away that these products were not Good Manufacturing compliant. This was her conclusion by October 2021. She wrote letters to the CDC and FDA about this. Senator Johnson brought this data to the attention of the CDC and FDA also. The CDC and FDA never did anything.

 

- At the end of 2021, Mike Yeadon sent Sasha a package of leaked documents from the EMA, about 800 pages worth, and a dozen emails between the regulators (EMA, MHRA, FDA). This package was actually leaked around Nov 30, 2020. It was clear from these documents, that this drug product was substandard, and the worse product she had ever seen. The bulk of the documents were from EMA regulators themselves.

 

- Sasha tells us the number one thing that the regulators have to approve is the manufacturing. If you can’t manufacture, then safety and efficacy doesn’t matter. And yet all the scientists and doctors are focusing on safety and efficacy and no one is looking at manufacturing. The EMA documents showed evidence that the EMA regulators had raised 100 major objections to the approval of the Pfizer product.

- An example of an objection. Pfizer had provided no evidence they were making the spike protein. And, we later learnt they faked the Western Blots, which was an assay to characterise the spike protein. It was a computer generated fake.

 

- Sasha shows us the 3 drug approval pathways that are relevant to the approval of the vaccines in the USA. The normal FDA regulatory pathway for market approval. The Expanded Access Use pathway. The Emergency Use Authorisation pathway, and she explains the differences. There was a lot of confusion, and many people thought the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) was in fact the Expanded Use pathway, but they are very different.

 

- The EUA comes under a brand new paragraph of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, called Paragraph 564.

 

EUA countermeasures can only be issued when the HHS has declared a public health emergency. And they are designated as non-investigational. And so none of the laws that normally apply to drugs apply to these countermeasures. EG No IRB (investigational review board), no informed consent for recipients, and good manufacturing practise is not enforced. The only criteria needed, is that the HHS secretary thinks they may be effective.

 

- For an in depth explanation of the legal framework, there is a good video of Sasha and Katherine Watt (the US para legal who worked with Sasha), explaining all the legal codes that were put in place in the USA, in the years preceding 2020. Sasha explains it took 3 years to unravel all the legal codes around this.
See reference below.

 

- Sasha shows us the transcript of a meeting, in which Doran Fink (deputy director of Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) in the FDA, on Oct 22, 2020, stated that the FDA decided to use the EUA pathway rather than the expanded access use for approval of the Covid vaccines. And the reason was that expanded use required IRB and informed consent. That would add complexity. See Reference below.

 

- Doran Fink is now at Moderna.

 

- Sasha shows us the Pfizer timeline, showing the activity in terms of approvals etc. from March 2020 through to Dec 2024. She points out that Doran Fink says they switched to EUA in Oct 2020, but she believes that in fact the switch happened in July 2020 as that is when Pfizer began mass producing the 30 million doses for the rollout. And, as we discuss, this was before phase 3 even started and before FDA approval of the product . That would have been illegal under IND.

 

- In addition, the formula for the product was changed 5/6 times during the phase 3 trial i.e. they changed which drug they were testing. This was found in the 1100 page protocol document.

 

- The FDA issued a BLA (Biologics License Application) in August 2021. So everyone thought the Pfizer vaccine was fully approved. But Sasha shows us the BLA letter, and it references the 2 Pfizer clinical trials, the Phase1/2 trial and the phase 3 trial, which were NOT clinical trials. So the BLA is fake, its illegal and the FDA is certifying the fraud. That’s why there are 2 products, but in the USA they never shipped the Comirnaty product, only the EUA product (BioNTech).

 

- Sasha explains that as long as the PREP Act is in place, these products “will not be deemed adulterated or misbranded”, and shows us the excerpt from the US code. This is why there is no enforcement of good manufacturing practise.

 

- We discuss the involvement of the US Department of Defence. The DOD is the CEO of the operation, is totally in charge, and HHS has only an advisory role. The money all came from the DOD.

 

- Sasha reveals that she has an audio of a discussion at a pharma company regarding a phone call that they received on Feb 4, 2020 from DOD. The DOD told them on that day, to switch from pan influenza (they were part of the P3 consortium) to Covid as Covid had been classified as a national security threat. See references.

 

- What is the Pandemic Preparedness Program (P3), which was started in 2017. The person in charge of P3 is Colonel Matt Hepburn, and he is the mastermind. He has published TED talks on P3, and has claimed we can predict viruses and we will make vaccines in hours.

 

- We ask Sasha who she thinks is behind the release of the virus and the injections.

 

Websites referenced in the Interview:

 

- Sasha Latypova’s Substack, which is called Due Diligence and Art.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com

 

- Video discussion between Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova explaining the US Legal codes and the forensic work done by Katherine to uncover how the EUA was created. https://rumble.com/v3udbi4-sasha-latypova-and-katherine-watt-talking-about-non-regulation-of-non-medic.html

 

-Doran Fink at VRBPAC meeting Oct 22, 2020. The entire transcript is here. Go to page 203 to see the answer by Doran Fink.

https://www.fda.gov/media/143982/download

 

- A good place for new readers to start. A summary of Everything - End 2023.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/summary-of-everything-and-quick-links

 

- Audio Leak from pharma company regarding Feb 4, 2020 call from DOD.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/audio-leaked-from-astrazeneca-covid

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

Evidence Shows Biological ID System Has Already Been Deployed

Fluorescent glow in the faces of the vaxxed under UV light

 

By GREG REESE

FEB 20, 2024

The Reese Report

 

[Blog Editor: At SlantRight 2.0 I will use the Bitchute version. On CPCR Wordpress I’ll link to Bitchute but since Wordpress no longer embeds Bitchute, I’ll upload the Substack version AND of my Substack page will get the Substack version.]

 

Bitchute VIDEO: EVIDENCE SHOWS BIOLOGICAL ID SYSTEM HAS ALREADY BEEN DEPLOYED

[Posted by Greg Reese

First Published February 20th, 2024 12:53 UTC 

 

… MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

TRANSCRIPT:

 

Emotionally, it is easy to dismiss the work of Doctor Ana Maria Mihalcea for it is very disturbing. But her work is shown through scientific testing and backed up by government and NGO documentation. And the evidence shows that humanity has already been infected with cutting edge surveillance nanotechnology. This is a follow up to my last report on Doctor Mihalcea’s Hydrogel research.

 

New research shows that those who received the COVID shots emit a fluorescent orange glow in their faces that is visible under a UV light of 365 nano-meters. And those who have been exposed to shedding emit this glow around their nose.

 

After his wife was coerced into getting the COVID shot, PhD Justin Coy began his own research. He found that the more shots a person received, the more they glowed under UV light. The glow can be seen initially around the nose, and over time spreads throughout the entire face and into the neck.

 

After a hot shower, filaments are expelled through the skin of the vaxxed. And these filaments also emit a glow under UV light. These filaments not only glow, but they have been shown to move on their own in spastic movements. And they are also attracted to people. In videos they can be seen trying to latch on to a finger. And when a person who has received the shot has dry skin, these expelled filaments will become airborne. This could explain how shedding occurs from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed. The Pfizer trial documents stated that an unvaxxed individual in close proximity to someone who’s been vaxxed can be infected by inhalation and skin contact.

 

In 2008 a biological nanotechnology pesticide designed to kill the Brown Moth in the state of California was deployed and appears to have included the same sort of fluorescent invisible micro dye that we see in the scientific research. Doctor Hildegarde Staninger tested individuals exposed to this nano-tech pesticide and found that a glow could be detected in their eyes under UV light. Doctor Staninger called this the Eye of Horus effect due to its similar appearance. And claimed it was due to the use of fluorescent thiocyanate in the pesticide. Which according to the literature, would have been used to track the effectiveness of the dispersal.

 

This idea has been around for decades. The Institute for National Security Studies, Nonlethal Weapons: Terms and References, published in 1997, discusses an invisible infrared dye which is visible under UV light so that rioters can be later identified.

 

Justin Coy points out how the genetic code for Luciferase, a bio-luminescent enzyme found in nature, is included in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines along with SV40, which could theoretically allow the Luciferase to be written into the genetics of the recipient. Coy proposes that this could be what is causing the vaxxed to glow under UV light.

 

The TRACE act, H.R.6666 [Blog Editor: Link to Bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text] - COVID19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone Act, was introduced in May of 2020. The bill authorizes the Centers for Disease Control to contact trace and monitor the population.

 

In late 2020 and early 2021, people all over the world started noticing purple streetlights. Which is the color of UV light.

 

The quantum dot tattoo research funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided a way of detecting whether or not a person was vaccinated by including fluorescent medical information in the vaccines. [Blog Editor: I’ve noticed Left-oriented & Globalist-oriented Fact Checkers have pooh-poohed the quantum dot assertion. SO HERE’S THE SCIENCE BEING POOH-POOHED: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE & HERE.] Invisible near infrared tattoos that would imprint beneath the skin to later be read by customized smartphones. In the scientific literature on quantum dot research, these fluorescent medical information tattoos have a similar appearance to the faces of those infected by the vaxx under UV light.

 

You may or may not believe in biblical prophecy, but it seems clear that the ones running this diabolical program are using it as their playbook. From Revelation 13:

 

“And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark”

 

But never forget we still have free will.

 

© 2024 Greg Reese

The Reese Report HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT The Reese Report