DONATE

Showing posts with label Yuri Bezmenov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yuri Bezmenov. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 27, 2024

WE-THE-PEOPLE Must Become Aware to Reinstill American Liberty

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 27, 2024


 

These days I tend to focus on the realization that Globalist aligned interests – outside & inside the USA – for decades have been working to erode Individual Liberty, Individual Free Speech, Christian Religious Liberty and American Sovereignty. This is an American observation, BUT I realize individuals in the ONCE-UPON-A-TIME Free World Representative Governments have been dealing with the same issues.

 

Under the guise that hopefully there is a growing awareness that an Elitist Few are trying to dictate and control the way WE THE PEOPLE live, move and have our being – Irrespective if WE THE PEOPLE like/dislike or agree/disagree with a Leftist-Globalist-Elitist control agenda.

 

I’m the kind of American who does NOT like being told what to believe. AND SO I RESIST at least on an individual basis. AND I am more than willing to join like-minded individuals who feel the same way.

 

With this frame of mind I possess, I want to share three Substack posts I ran into over the past couple of days which pretty much falls into my way of thinking:

 

The Last Straw; By David Chanley; David’s Substack; 2/25/24

 

--Chanley launches an essay using the 5 Laws of Human Stupidity to peg where people are in their way of life in a socio-political existence. Chanley’s thoughts are enlightening and hopefully awareness-grabbing.

 

"Psychological and Cognitive Warfare on Citizens": My Speech at the International Crisis Summit-5 in Washington DC; By
ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS; Who is Robert Malone; 2/26/24

 

--Frankly, I trust and appreciate Dr. Malone’s efforts to battle Medical Tyranny. AND I am aware within the anti-Medical Tyranny ranks Dr. Malone’s personality has rubbed many who should be colleagues to such irritation that way too much mutual recriminations between the Malone camp and Malone-Detractor camp. So much so that personally I ONLY pay attention to what the two-sides agree on (which is actually substantial) rather than the blistering recriminations levelled at each other in an effort to discredit over what I consider stupid disagreements.

 

THAT BEING SAID, Dr. Malone’s recent post (which includes a 25-Minute video) focuses on Liberty is the essence of American life but the U.S. Government has become so corrupt in foreign meddling that our current tyranny just might be the result of a U.S. Government Bad-Guy agenda.

 

The Secret War: A Silent Attack on America's Soul; By DALLAS LUDLUM; The Conservative Compass; 2/26/24

 

--Ludlum reexamines Yuri Bezmenov – a 1970s defector from now defunct USSR Communism – speeches on the Soviet agenda to subvert American culture and the U.S. Government. How Bezmenov could have nearly been prophetic of the USA’s current tyrannical bent. Then offers potential ways to reverse the American tyranny status.

 

After the Ludlum cross post I decided to add a bonus video I uploaded to my Bitchute Channel I found on my laptop of Yuri Bezmenov lecturing on “Psychological Warfare Subversion Control of Western Society”.

 

JRH 2/27/24

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*****************************

The Last Straw

 

By David Chanley

February 25, 2024

David’s Substack

 

[JRH-Blog Editor: I did some list editing that I believe adds a bit more clarity in the Chanley post.]

 

In 1976 Carlo Cipolla a professor of economic history came up with 5 Laws of Human Stupidity.  Cipolla's system identified 4 categories of people.  The first group he labeled as helpless.  The second group he labeled the intelligent.  The third group he labeled the bandits.  The fourth group he labeled the stupid. [Bold text added by Blog Editor]

The 5 Laws of Human Stupidity are as follows: 

 

1 Everyone underestimates the number of stupid people.  There are more stupid people in society than the people believe there are. 

 

2 The probability a person is stupid is not related to any other characteristic.  Education, wealth or status are not involved.  Stupid people are among every subgroup of people you can categorize. 

 

3 A stupid person causes losses to other people while not getting any gain themselves.  That is Cipolla's definition of a stupid person. 

 

4 Not-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid people.  Stupid people cause more harm than people believe.  Dealing with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake. 

 

5 A stupid person is the most dangerous and even more dangerous than the bandits.


The 5 Laws of Human Stupidity contains 4 factors of human behavior: 

 

1 A person does something that causes his own loss but does not cause others to lose.  This is the helpless group. 

 

2 A person benefits themselves and others.  This is the intelligent group. 

 

3 A person benefits themselves and causes others to lose.  This is the bandit group. 

 

4 A person does not benefit themselves and also causes others to lose.  This is the stupid group.

Cipolla claims the bandits scam the helpless.  So the helpless do little for society.  The helpless can be altruists and pacifists.  On moral grounds they are helpless.  Intelligent people contribute to society and in return receive some of the benefits that society gains.  Bandits are concerned more with their own self-interest and personal gain.  The bandits "look out for number one" even if it harms others and society.  The bandits should be stopped.  Stupid people cause a net loss to society, for no real valid reason.  Stupid people frustrate, anger and confuse everyone else.

Cipolla claims stupid people are stupid by nature.  Being stupid is not taught and does not come from a lack of education.  Cipolla claims stupid people are naturally stupid, and education does not cure stupid.  Education and experience can reduce or increase the amount of stupid someone has.  Stupid people cause more damage in direct relation to the importance of the position they are given.  The greater the position stupid people are placed in the greater damage to society and others they cause.  Joe Biden and diversity hires are excellent examples of that.

Stupid is a natural propensity that can be taught to become more or less stupid.  Take the left-wing-led Uni-party for example.  They cause losses to others so they can feel good about themselves.  The left-wing-led Uni-party wants to help.  What the left-wing-led Uni-party does to help actually hurts.  To help the poor the left-wing led Uni-party does what causes inflation.  The inflation the left-wing led Uni-party causes only makes the poor poorer.  The inflation the left-wing led Uni-party causes hurts the poor that they were trying to help.  The inflation that the left-wing-led Uni-party causes hurts society and everyone except the very wealthy 1%.  The left-wing-led Uni-party supporters get no real benefit other than the illusion of being helpful.  But what they do hurts society and the 99%.  That is Cipolla's definition of stupid.

Stop electing stupid people.  If what they do "to help the poor" causes inflation they are stupid.  If they don't know what a woman is they are stupid.  If you didn't already know that someone who does not know what a woman is, is stupid, then you too are stupid.  What you try to do to help others will actually harm them and not help them.

Eventually, the stupid also suffer from the policies they enforce.  They usually blame something else for causing the problem.  They usually deny that what they did caused the problem.  Sometimes they realize how horrible their policies are.  Sometimes they realize their policies for approaching utopia don't work in the real world.  Then they become less stupid.

Today the 1% are the puppeteers of a Uni-party.  Both parties of the two-party system are the Uni-party.  Both parties of the two-party system are run and controlled by the same group of globalist oligarchs who pull the strings.  Both parties of the two-party system represent and benefit the same group of globalist oligarchs who pull the strings.  Both parties of the two-party system screw over the 99% to benefit the 1% and their agenda.  Today the left wing is leading the Uni-party for the benefit of the 1%.

Realize that the left-wing-led Uni-party inflation causing ideas to approach utopia does not work in the real world.  Realize that the most intelligent bandits are manipulating the stupid so they can gain from the losses of everyone else.  The most intelligent bandits tell you the things they caused that made the 99% to lose and the 1% to gain resulted from stupidity and incompetence.  Are you stupid if you believe that?  The 1% are intentionally manipulating the left-wing led Uni-party to demand what hurts the 99% and only benefits the 1%.

The left-wing-led Uni-party supporters are the stupid.  The left-wing-led Uni-party leaders are the more intelligent bandits.  The left-wing-led Uni-party leaders are not stupid.  The left-wing-led Uni-party leaders only blame the intentional harm they inflict on the 99% as resulting from stupidity.  They don't admit they are intentionally robbing the 99%.  Blaming the intentional harm they inflict on the 99% on stupidity when they intentionally rob the 99% is just a phony cover-up lie.  The followers who fall for that lie are stupid.

Another example of this left-wing-led Uni-party "stupidity" is the weaponization of the legal system.  The injustice of the phony charges against Trump and the abusive legal claim against him was seen as the last straw for many of the people who are harmed by the left-wing-led Uni-party policies.  That stimulus for the trucker boycott against New York was the last straw.  It was not the only straw.  It was just the tip of the iceberg.

The left-wing-led Uni-party weaponization of the legal system was very harmful to New York.  The left-wing-led Uni-party weaponization of the legal system was the last straw for many people and businesses.  Many people and businesses decided to leave New York.  Many people and businesses decided to not move to New York.  Others decided to sanction New York with a boycott.  People need to defend themselves from the stupid.  People need to sanction the stupidity.  People need to sanction the stupid.  The people of New York eventually will be the most harmed by the stupidity of the people of New York.  All of the society was harmed by the stupidity of the people of New York.

The trucker boycott of New York is self-defense by the innocent who are harmed by the stupidity of the left-wing-led Uni-party and those who support the left-wing-led Uni-party.  The trucker boycott of New York is the innocent demanding that the left-wing-led Uni-party stop harming society and everyone.  Abusing Trump with a weaponized legal system was their last straw.

The harmful stupidity of the left-wing led Uni-party amounted to a huge iceberg of harmful stupidity even before the Trump case.  The innocent people harmed by the left-wing-led Uni-party stupidity have finally had too much.  The trucker boycott of New York is about the entire iceberg of the left-wing-led Uni-party stupidity.

The iceberg of the left-wing-led Uni-party stupidity includes all the harm to society and the American people.  Both sides of the left-wing-led Uni-party have been doing stupidity to harm the 99% for the benefit of the agenda of the 1%.  Both sides of the left-wing-led Uni-party have been stupid.  The supporters of the left-wing-led Uni-party have been stupid.

The left-wing-led Uni-party created Covid with unsupervised tax dollars, for the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs used Covid as an excuse to abuse, oppress and claim more control over the 99%.  The support of the control by the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs harmed the 99%.  1% cabal of globalist oligarchs are criminal bandits.  The people who support the left-wing-led Uni-party are stupid and caused harm to others while gaining no benefit themselves.

The mandated Covid protocols were very harmful.  The mandated restrictions to freedom were unnecessary, not beneficial and were based on lies.  Now the WHO treaty is set up to screw us again only harder next time.  Agenda 2030 and 15-minute cities will oppress, enslave and imprison us even more.  Anyone supporting the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs' controlled left-wing-led Uni-party that is doing this to us is stupid.

The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs controls the left-wing-led Uni-party.  They are flooding the country with illegal aliens and rewarding them with the benefits that are denied to the workers who earned them.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs controlled by the left-wing-led Uni-party is bombing and conducting wars against many countries based on lies.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs left wing led Uni-party is greatly financially fleecing the people of the world.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs controlled by the left-wing-led Uni-party is unnecessarily harming others and causing them to be refugees.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs are pocketing tax money in the name of "defense" spending.

The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs controlled by the left-wing-led Uni-party is demanding that two wrongs make a right.  They destroy places causing refugees.  Then they invite the flood of refugees to destroy America and Europe too.  That is being doubly stupid.  Not being stupid is the solution.  Stop the wars.  Stop the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs from exploiting people into extreme poverty.  Stop making the refugees in the first place.

The two wrongs don't make a right.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs just pile another wrong on top of the two wrongs.  Corrupt money laundering called foreign aid robs more tax money into the pockets of the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs.  The left-wing-led Uni-party supports this wrong.  The people who support the left-wing-led Uni-party that is doing these things to society are stupid.

The left-wing-led Uni-party pushes for centralized education.  That imposes an immoral curriculum on everyone.  That dumbs down everyone.  That does not provide the mental tools people need to be successful.  That only helps the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs exploit and control the masses.  That harms the 99% without providing them any benefit.  Supporting the left-wing-led Uni-party pushing centralized education is stupid.

The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs abuses the 99% with their weaponized control of food.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs control of food allows them to extract more money from the 99% when the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs sells food to the 99%.  The left-wing-led Uni-party complicity in the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs control of food harms the 99%.  Supporting the left-wing-led Uni-part is stupid.

The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs abuses the 99% with their weaponized control of energy.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs control of energy allows them to extract more money from the 99% when the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs sells energy to the 99%.  Higher energy costs makes everything more expensive.  Everything being more expensive causes the 99% to get less.  The left-wing-led Uni-party complicity with the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs’ control of energy harms the 99%.  Supporting the left-wing-led Uni-part is stupid.

The masses fell for the lies of the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs.  The Earth is honestly cooling, not warming.  Because of lies the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs abuses the 99% with their weaponized control of food and energy.  The left-wing-led Uni-party complicity in the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs’ control of food and energy harms the 99%.  Supporting the left-wing-led Uni-party is stupid.

The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs abuses the 99% with their weaponized control of medicine.  The 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs control of medicine allows them to extract more money from the 99% when the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs sells medicine to the 99%.  The left-wing led Uni-party complicity in the 1% cabal of globalist oligarchs’ control of medicine harms the 99%.  Supporting the left-wing-led Uni-part is stupid.

The impoverishing taxes imposed on the masses cause more poverty.  Inflation from wasteful government spending causes more poverty.  This government excess takes the wealth from the 99% and transfers it to the 1%.  The left-wing-led Uni-party complicity in this wealth transfer harms the 99%.  Supporting the left-wing-led Uni-part is stupid.

Reverse discrimination as a solution for discrimination was another straw of harmful stupidity that was piled on the camel's back.  The victim mentality was another straw of harmful stupidity that was piled on the camel's back.  Toxic feminism that destroyed the family was another straw of harmful stupidity that was piled on the camel's back.  Race-baiting was another straw of harmful stupidity that was piled on the camel's back.

The destructive "mostly peaceful" riots that destroyed black neighborhoods and businesses was another straw of harmful stupidity that was piled on the camel's back.  These destructive "mostly peaceful" riots had pallet loads of bricks delivered to them.  These destructive "mostly peaceful" riots took place in designated "FED districts".  These destructive "mostly peaceful" riots allowed the puppeteers who pulled the strings to cause the riots to be able to buy up the land they wanted very inexpensively.

These destructive "mostly peaceful" riots were orchestrated by the 1% and were land grabs by the 1%.  These destructive "mostly peaceful" riots in FED district land grabs were another straw of harmful stupidity that was piled on the camel's back.  The "mostly peaceful" riot protests destroyed those they claimed to be trying to help.  Such destruction as a form of "help" is an extreme example of the definition of stupid.

Not all land grabs by the 1% involved destructive "mostly peaceful" riots.  Some land grabs by the 1% used wildfires that destroyed buildings more than trees.  Some like Lahaina and places in California that were designated and mapped out for public works projects were actually criminal land grabs by the 1%.

Left-wing-led Uni-party policies destroy society and hurt everyone.  The terrible results of the left-wing-led Uni-party policies turn vibrant prosperous cities into impoverished slums.

How can the left-wing-led Uni-party supporters keep denying what a total disaster the left-wing-led Uni-party policies produce?  Just look at the left-wing-led Uni-party-run cities.  They are impoverished slums that once were very successful thriving cities.  First Baltimore went from wealthy and thriving to slums of poverty after switching from pragmatic management that worked in the real world to left-wing-led Uni-party utopia-minded government that was a total disaster in the real world.  Left-wing-led Uni-party policies destroy society and hurt everyone.  The terrible results of left-wing-led Uni-party policies turn vibrant prosperous cities into impoverished slums.

Then Detroit went from being wealthy and thriving to slums of poverty after switching from pragmatic management that worked in the real world to a left-wing-led Uni-party utopia-minded government that was a total disaster in the real world.  Now New York, San Francisco, and Seattle have gone from wealthy and thriving to slums of poverty after switching from pragmatic management that worked in the real world to left-wing-led Uni-party utopia-minded government that is a total disaster in the real world.

Healthy clean thriving vibrant cities are being destroyed by left-wing-led Uni-party utopia-minded ideologies and totally disastrous policies that literally cause poverty.  Entire states are also going from being very successful and thriving states to being cesspools of disaster by the left-wing-led Uni-party utopia-minded ideologies that cause disaster in the real world.

Left-wing-led Uni-party ideologies also ruin entire countries.  Venezuela and Argentina were once thriving successful affluent prosperous countries.  Then the utopia-minded disastrous left-wing led Uni-party ideologies took over and turned tremendously successful and prosperous countries into impoverished hellholes.

The cabal of globalist oligarchs has fooled their followers into desiring the utopia of the ideology that destroys societies and people.  That benefits the globalist oligarchs.  That removes prosperity from the masses so the globalist oligarchs can have it.  The globalist oligarch Uni-party puppet politician then push for all the enslaving and impoverishing policies on the masses who fell for the idea of utopia rather than the real world.

The migrant invasion is destroying cities and the country.  Lavish benefits are given to illegals and denied to those who earned them.  That is just more abuse of the 99% by the left-wing-run Uni-party.  The tremendous amount of money being sent to foreign countries could greatly help Americans, and improve America.  This wasteful harm suits the agenda of the cabal of globalist oligarchs.  This wasteful harm is part of the platform of the left-wing-led Uni-party.

Why would any American support such harm to themselves, their society and their fellow Americans?  Why would any American tolerate such harm to themselves, their society and their fellow Americans?  For many, this was their last straw.  They can not tolerate the load of disastrous straws the left-wing-led Uni-party has burdened them with.  Why not have those supporting the disastrous policies that are causing the suffering to also suffer and stop denying the suffering they are helping to cause?  The working class is greatly harmed and needs to speak up.

Americans did not revolt against all these harmful left-wing-led Uni-party disastrous things that were forced on society.  It took a lot to get people to no longer tolerate all these harmful things they were forced to endure.  The Covid mandates of bad protocols not based on science were the last straw for Canadian truckers.  For farmers destroying their farms, businesses and families that was the last straw for them.  The weaponized unjust legal system was the last straw for American truckers and others.

The farmers have had enough.  The stupidity of the left-wing-led Uni-party followers is based on lies.  That is causing them much more harm than anyone should have to suffer.  The stupidity of the Left-wing-led Uni-party followers is causing everyone but the 1% to suffer more poverty.  The stupidity of the Left-wing-led Uni-party followers is causing death by starvation.  This harm is all based on lies so the 1% can have another power and money grab.  The farmers are revolting against this war on humanity.  Will the 99% of humanity quit being so stupid?

The totally corrupt and weaponized USA legal system was the last straw for many including truckers.  The totally corrupt and weaponized USA legal system covers up and ignores the serious crimes committed by those within the left-wing-led Uni-party.  The totally corrupt and weaponized USA legal system invents phony charges against and abuses those opposed to the left-wing-led Uni-party's destruction of society.

This is not just a trucker's strike against New York.  This is an everyone revolt against all the globalist oligarch corruption scams and abuse of the masses.  This is not just a trucker's strike against New York but an everyone revolt against the left-wing-led Uni-party that the globalist oligarchs control.  This should not be just a trucker's strike against New York.  This should be an everyone revolt against all the harmful and destructive stupid policies of the left-wing-led Uni-party everywhere.  This should be an everyone revolt against the cabal of globalist oligarchs who pull the strings causing all these harmful things to the 99%.

If the left-wing-led Uni-party is going to keep harming everyone else with their terrible BS, then others are going to make sure it harms those who are supporting that at the same time.  Those supporting the harm must feel the harm in time to stop the harm before it does too much damage.  Those supporting all the harm need to stop harming themselves and everyone else.  Those supporting all the harm to the 99% that only benefits the 1% need to stop harming themselves and everyone else.

No matter how altruistic people feel everyone else can't avoid and deny the fact the left-wing-led Uni-party is the cause of poverty and much injustice.  The policies that arise from the attitudes of the left-wing-led Uni-party followers are just pure disasters for society.  Humanity can no longer tolerate such disastrous stupidity.  The followers of the left-wing-led Uni-party are not just dupes who are falling for the con of the globalist oligarchs to exploit the 99%.  They are stooges who refuse to recognize the disasters they have left behind everywhere they go.

The rest of society has had enough of the social disasters and downright criminal behavior of the left-wing-led Uni-party.  The rest of society has had enough of the lies used to justify the harmful and disastrous ends.  The criminal means of the left-wing-led Uni-party are "justified" so they can force their disastrous ideas of utopia on the real world.  Those causing others and society to suffer need to experience the suffering they are causing.  Those causing others and society to suffer need to immediately experience the suffering they are causing so they can realize they too need to help stop the suffering.  Those causing others and society to suffer need to immediately experience the suffering they are causing so they can realize they too need to stop the "utopia" policies that result in disaster and suffering in the real world.  Those causing others and society to suffer need to immediately experience the suffering they are causing so they can realize the "utopia" policies that result in disaster and suffering in the real world are based on lies.

It is about time that the left-wing-led Uni-party supporters who are inflicting disasters on others suffer the disasters they are inflicting on the world at the same time others are suffering from them.  The left-wing-led Uni-party total BS is now destroying the USA.  Thank God some sanity is fighting back to save itself and not letting the left-wing-led Uni-party destroy themselves by destroying their neighbors and fellow man first.  Thank God some are not accepting their own destruction by left-wing-led Uni-party BS and are making the left-wing-led Uni-party followers be the first, not the last to suffer from their own BS.

Everything the left-wing-led Uni-party is pushing is disastrous for the 99% and only benefits the 1%.  But the left-wing-led Uni-party followers think the disastrous bs will make the Earth and society a utopia.  However, the real world results always are a dystopia of poverty, tyranny and oppression.  The left-wing-led Uni-party wars, economic ideology and economic systems produce the refugees.  Today the left-wing-led Uni-party is making Americans refugees in their own country.

Society has been weaponized against the masses and against the opposition to the globalist oligarch cabal's tyranny.  The trucker boycott of New York City was just the last straw.  The trucker boycott of New York City resulted from all the horrible disastrous straws that have been piled on our backs.  The trucker boycott of New York City resulted from the entire load of horrible disastrous straws that have been piled on our backs.  The totally corrupt and unjust justice system was just the last straw.

Blaming the last straw and ignoring the entire load will not solve the problems.  Left-wing-run places will keep going the way of left-wing-run places.  Left-wing-run places will keep going to Hell.  Even left-wing-run places without a boycott are going to Hell because of the left-wing-run Uni-party policies.  New York screwed itself long before the boycott.  The boycott of New York is to keep the crap that is destroying New York from infecting and ruining the entire country.

The last straw has already broken the back of the tolerance camel for many people.  The more disaster you tolerate the more disaster straws will be piled on the camel's back.  Haven't you already had enough?  Haven't you already had too much?  Shouldn't you want to stop the disasters and suffering?  Shouldn't you be an active part of the revolt against the globalist oligarchs and the Uni-party they control that works for them not for you and not for We The People?

 

© 2024 David C

David’s Substack HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT David’s Substack

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Psychological and Cognitive Warfare on Citizens"

My Speech at the International Crisis Summit-5 in Washington DC

 

By ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS

February 26, 1024

Who is Robert Malone

 

[JRH-Blog Editor: Of my three Blogs: SlantRight 2.0 gets the Bitchute version I uploaded; Wordpress no longer embeds Bitchute, thus my CPCR Blog gets a direct video upload; AND Substack page also gets a direct video upload.]

 

Bitchute VIDEO: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE WARFARE ON CITIZENS – DR. ROBERT MALONE

[Posted by SlantRight2

First Published February 27th, 2024 16:26 UTC

 

MORE DSCRIPTION]

 

Transcript as follows:

 

Thank you so much for coming on behalf of the organizers and the whole ICS initiative, which continues to grow. Thank you for your courage and commitment in all that you've done by just being here. It's clear that you're one of those that are committed to freedom and personal autonomy and sovereignty. I'd like to tell you about the thing that bothers me the most right now.

 

The truth is, it's not medical freedom. It's not even the problem of the lies that we've been told about the COVIDcrisis or the gross mismanagement of the COVIDcrisis. It's the willingness of governments to deploy modern cognitive and psychological warfare tools and technologies against their own citizenry in combination and particular with the power of modern big tech.

 

We're all perplexed by what has happened over the last four years, and I think we've all had this gradual series of small awakenings. We have the privilege, as a friend of mine put it to me the other day, of being able right now to go down these various rabbit holes, these various journeys in fact discovery, and discuss them among ourselves. We all find these little tiny factoids of truth in a sea of lies, and we carefully gather those little bits of truth and share them with each other and talk about their deep inner meaning and the implications. We don't think that in five years we may not even be able to do that.

 

We may look back and say, "Good heavens, we were so free back then in 2024." Just like we look back from today at 2020 and say, "We were so naive." I know I feel that way. I'm now to the point where I look back at my whole life and all the things that I believed.

 

I love America. I love the land. I love the people. I love the diversity of cultures. I love the commitment to freedom and personal success and the ability of individuals to pursue life, liberty, and happiness, and property. But I have had this growing concern in the back of my mind, particularly over the last six to nine months, that maybe we're not the good guys. Maybe some of the things that the government has been doing has been what has led us to this point. Maybe what we're seeing is the maturation of a series of decisions and activities and policies and practices and infrastructure that have been built over my entire lifespan. As I look back and read about Operation Mockingbird, the birth of the CIA, information warfare, psychological warfare.

 

What I see is that even since the Second World War, really since the founding of the CIA from OSS (Office of Strategic Services), there's been a longstanding policy of the United States government acting in ways particularly offshore, that support their own interests and the interests of large financial organizations, but don't really respect the values that I believed we were all about here in the United States.

 

Freedom, sovereignty, personal autonomy, the rights of the individual to succeed in society. A resistance to the logic of Marxism and socialism and communism. These things I thought were fundamental American principles. That is, a commitment to self-governance. A belief in the social contract that the citizens of a nation-state, the citizens of the United States, the citizens of Canada, the citizens of Europe, of Romania grant - through an election process. In which we give rights to government in exchange for the government committing to respecting the autonomy, sovereignty and will of the people.

 

This has been referred to as the social contract. Now what I've come to learn over the last four years, and it seems to be accelerating, this awareness, is that there's a suite of technologies and capabilities that have been developed over decades that are able to influence everything that we think and feel and hear and believe. These technologies have been developed and deployed specifically to advance American interests through State Department and intelligence community and DoD, offshore. They have been outwardly facing. And the same is true in all the Five Eyes nations including Canada, UK, Australia, United States, and New Zealand. This alliance has taken the position that it's acceptable to deploy this kind of propaganda and dirty tricks to do things that we thought were necessary in a very difficult world, very challenging world.

 

Let me give you an example. Right after World War II, Italy faced an election and the election was on the edge, looked like it might well go towards a political party that would bring Italy into the sphere of influence of the USSR, the Soviet Union. The United States State Department and intelligence communities, thought it was justified to intervene using any dirty tricks they could to influence that election to favor a pro-Western outcome.

 

They formed an alliance with the Mafia and they succeeded. Now, was that a good thing or a bad thing? Was it ethical? Probably not. Was it a good outcome that Italy ended up in a Western sphere and European Union instead of in a Soviet sphere? We can argue that in reverse, but I think many people would say, "Yeah, that was a relatively good outcome, could have been worse." So there's one example that has been used subsequently to justify the increasing development of a dirty tricks capability involving psychological manipulation, information manipulation, media manipulation, and cognitive manipulation. And like many things in government that has turned into a slippery slope. "Well, it's okay there. Maybe it should be okay here. Maybe we need to influence this government. We need to overturn that government."

 

The capability gradually built and built, but the consensus in the United States from both parties, hence we refer to the uniparty, was that so long as this remained an outwardly directed tool of foreign affairs and foreign influence, advancing the overall... I'm sorry, imperial interest of the United States and the corporations that were associated with that, that was acceptable so long as they didn't turn it back towards the American citizenry. That was the agreement from both Democrats and Republicans, a general consensus on foreign policy and the willingness of state, DoD and intelligence to cooperate, to influence global affairs, and particularly to influence Europe. We treated Europe almost as our garden, our protectorate.

 

We chose to act, to ensure that European parties were aligned with American political and economic interests. Then the internet developed. And as the internet developed and became a mature system, truly free, Then there became an awareness that the learning of modern psychology, the teaching, could be integrated with the tools of the internet to profoundly influence the outcome of elections. I think it's in 2015, there was a key paper, peer-reviewed and published that demonstrated that Google by just manipulating the information that a viewer sees on an individual basis in a transitory way, could swing an election by 20 points. Peer-reviewed, carefully validated information, and that data has gotten even stronger since then. Robert Epstein is one of the leaders in this initiative. Google by cooperating with a nation-state or American nation-state and acting in foreign affairs can swing elections by up to 20 points.

 

That's a fact. And the way they do it is by controlling what you hear, what you think, what you feel, what you are allowed to discuss. And what's not to like? Suddenly the United States had an incredible tool that could be deployed to influence things like, let's say, elections in the Middle East. We could engineer tools, social media tools like Twitter. As I've written before, Twitter was engineered as a weapon, not as a business. It is an intentional social media psychological manipulation weapon is how it was built. I don't have enough time to go into the details. It maps everything about you. This is part of this amazing database infrastructure that's been created to intend to basically know everything about every single person in the globe and manipulate that to whatever end. The United States government deployed Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and the other tools during Arab Spring and had enormous success in overturning regimes throughout the Middle East. It was incredibly powerful, like nothing they had ever seen. This was greased lightning.

 

And then two things happened. Talk about blowback, Brexit and Donald Trump, and suddenly the intelligence censorship industrial complex, State Department, DoD network and in the United States this has now been placed in the Department of Homeland Security, realized they had a risk. The tech and capabilities they'd built that they had deployed offshore were suddenly creating risk. The risk was that Europe would fragment and if Europe fragmented NATO would fall. We were facing Brexit, Frexit, et cetera. It was looking like much of Europe (the EU) would fall because of the ability of social media to distribute populist messages and disrupt elections, and they had to do something. They had to do something domestically. They had to do something in Canada. They had to do something in the UK. Suddenly we had the formation of organizations like the Trusted News Initiative. They were designed to resist the ability of populist and alternative media to create this kind of sudden abrupt change.

 

As that developed, there was a decision that this could be a consensus among these core allies. That it was going to be necessary to preserve democracy, much like the decision that it was believed necessary to intervene in the Italian elections right after World War II, for “the good of all of us”. There was a decision that it was going to be necessary “to save democracy”. Democracy defined as basically the idea that large established interests should be the ones able to define who the acceptable candidates are, and then the rest of us could vote among that portfolio. That was the concept. That's the concept that's being promoted now when they talk about saving democracy. In order to save democracy we had to deploy this enormously powerful technology that was designed for largely offshore combat and advancing the interests of the United States government and its allies globally.

 

It was going to be necessary to deploy that technology against the citizenry. I argue, and I think this is probably one of the most important thing that's come out of me thinking about all this and trying to make sense out of censorship and listening to so many experts that have taught me about psychological manipulation, neuro-linguistic programming and everything else, is that when a government is willing to deploy this technology with its power against its own citizenry, then the concept of sovereignty and personal autonomy becomes completely obsolete. You think you're able to resist this, but the data show that actually it's often the most educated, that are the most susceptible. We are all susceptible to the power of the modern psychological warfare and cognitive warfare technologies. Cognitive warfare being those suites of capabilities that are designed to get into your subconscious. There has been a decision, a consensus, that this is acceptable in order to avoid the effects of these populous movements.

 

That's where we're at right now. As this was initially justified based on the thesis of Russian bot farms and the threat of Russian election interference, which is why the TNI, “the Trusted News Initiative” was set up and so many of these other entities were built. It was decided that that capability designed to resist Russian intrusion was now going to be necessary to be deployed domestically. And, in particular, there arose a specific example that was going to be necessary to use this technology, the rise of the anti-vaxxer movement. The unwillingness of persons, increasing uneasiness of individuals and parents to accept vaccines for their children. Shortly after this decision was made, this Trusted News Initiative pivoted and was reformulated to address the “anti-vaxxer”. Then suddenly we had this event in late 2019 of the entrance of an engineered coronavirus into the human population in Wuhan, and its rapid spread.

 

It was deemed necessary to employ this technology, this psychological and cognitive warfare technology on the general population because of the threat of SARS‑CoV‑2, a virus which was by modeling, we now know it highly flawed modeling, going to lead to a 3.4% case fatality rate" or infection fatality rate. That's what we were told. Happens to be exactly the same number that they had, quote, "modeled" during Event 201 in the fall of 2019. We were told, and governments were told, and propagandized all over the world, particularly in the West, that this highly lethal virus was going to pose such an enormous threat that it was acceptable just like it was believed acceptable to interfere in the Italian elections after World War II, it was acceptable and necessary to deploy this kind of technology in order to advance the public good. To ensure that we would have full compliance for the measures that the government prescribed for all of us under the advice of the World Health Organization.

 

Mr. Tedros now insists that he'd never told anybody they had to lock down or social distance or accept vaccines. That this is all the governments that did this. That was the justification. And now we've seen the explosive growth and maturation of a whole industry, this censorship industrial complex.

 

What we have now is functionally akin to a series of mercenary armies or mercenary organizations, and they compete with each other. They almost all have academic links at places like Harvard-MIT, and Stanford. These organizations are actively competing with each other to censor and propagandize all of us, and to deploy the most advanced psychological manipulation tools that they can come up with “all for the common good”, all to “preserve democracy”, all to ensure that we have full compliance with vaccines. Now I'm going to close with another insight, I think, that might be helpful to you.

 

Here's a key question. Why is censorship wrong? We can say it's morally wrong. Well, some might say that's kind of squishy. In a functional way if we were to go up to Javier Milei right now and say, "Why shouldn't we do censorship? What is the argument against it?" Because there's all kinds of arguments that are being made for it by the administrative state in various powers that be in the World Economic Forum and the UN. They all like it. They want to be able to control the message. Think about what that means. Think of it from the standpoint of innovation. What it means is that those powers and forces, governments, economic units, large investment funds, et cetera, that are able to control the narrative, “The Great Narrative”, as Klaus Schwab puts it. What they can do is to lock in consensus around the current solution set, the current state of affairs.

 

The reason to deploy censorship and psychological technology on the population is to maintain the status quo, which is favorable to some group, some elite group - the oligarchs, we could call them. They want to maintain the current status and they want to do it through possession of this kind of technology. What that does is it creates a situation, particularly in times of change, such as we're in right now, where the difference between the current situation and an optimal solution gets larger and larger and larger. Does that make sense? You're locking in one set of solutions. You're not allowing the culture, the environment, the economies, the governments to adapt to change. You're forcing them to stay in this current situation. The populace observes that their situation relative to what could be becomes worse and worse and worse. There's a larger and larger gap between an optimal solution and the current solution.

 

Eventually that gap gets so big that it can only be resolved in one way. And we know what that way is. We call it revolution, major social disruption. Now, if you allow free speech and interaction in exchange of ideas in a decentralized environment, what you have is incremental improvements. You never get to that point where the population is so frustrated because they've been locked into a bad set of solutions. You don't have those major disruptions. You have gradual incremental evolutionary change in a society towards a better and better set of solutions for whatever the problem sets are. But by allowing propaganda - “PSYOPs”, what we're doing is we're locking, certainly, the Western population, and increasingly the global population, into a suboptimal set of solutions. Now, one of the other things that happens when you have one of those major disruptions is the population at that point is looking...

 

Think of the French Revolution.

 

Think of any revolution.

 

Populations in general, the average person sees this as a mess. "It's not serving my interests. I'm being pushed just like the Argentines did into worse and worse economic situation. I'm going to revolt. We're going to have some major change." And what do they do? They will take some solution off the shelf, such as Marxism, that's never really been tested. Never worked when it has been tested, but it's sold to them as a solution set. And they'll go ahead and grab that. Not only do we have these sudden disruption events that we call revolutions and the failure to incrementally allow for evolution in society and economics, but we have the willingness of a population to accept and assimilate some solution that's pushed to them, something that's marketed to them that's never been tested before. That's how we end up with these messy situations.

 

I don't have time to go into all the nitty-gritties and the wiring diagrams and the relationship between CISA and the State Department and all that. We can see that, and I recommend to you the recent Mike Benz interview with Tucker Carlson as a real eye-opener for the whole arc of history about how this is developed. In these brief remarks, I wanted to make the point that if we allow this to happen, we immediately lose sovereignty, autonomy. Any concept of election integrity goes right out the window.

 

Remember, peer-reviewed, validated paper shows a 20 point difference. All Google has to do is twizzle some knobs and they can basically choose whoever is going to win and whatever party is going to win and what the policies are going to be in pretty much any nation-state in the world right now. But furthermore, if we allow this censorship propaganda, industrial complex to continue to grow and develop, we're going to be in a situation in which we lock the world into a set of suboptimal solutions and prevent it from evolving to give rise to a better world for all of us. With that, I'm going to conclude and thank you for your interest. Again, thank you for being here.

 

© 2024 Robert W Malone, MD

Who is Robert Malone HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Who is Robert Malone

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Secret War: A Silent Attack on America's Soul

 

Secret War - Child Pledging Allegiance [Conservative Compass Photo]

 

By DALLAS LUDLUM

February 26, 2024

The Conservative Compass

 

I was in an accident last week. Because of the accident I have spent several days laying in a bed recuperating. During this ordeal, I have had plenty of time to think. Oddly, I have been considering the Pledge of Allegiance, and how it has disappeared from our schools. This lead me from topic to topic as my mind extrapolated different moments in time and events into this very Op-Ed. I hope you find it informative and it sparks you to consider the weight of what is happening to our country.

 

The Beginning: Yuri Bezmenov

 

The attacks on America started quietly within small groups of academia. Marxist and communist agents/activists started out small in the social sciences. Teaching Critical Theory masked inside their curriculum. They slowly began attacking our language, laying the seeds of political correctness. As well as, altering definitions and sowing confusion among the future leaders of our country.

 

We received our first warning of what was happening from a man named, Yuri Bezmenov. Bezmenov was a former KGB operative who defected to the West in the 1970s. After his defection, he took on the name Tomas David Schuman and became known for his public speaking and writing on the subject of Soviet tactics of subversion. Bezmenov provided a detailed account of the KGB's methods for subverting societies through ideological subversion, which he described as a slow process aimed at demoralizing and destabilizing enemy states from within, without the need for direct military action. His lectures and interviews, particularly a notable interview conducted in the 1980s, have been widely circulated and referenced for insights into the techniques used by the Soviet Union to influence and undermine Western societies.

EX-KGB Agent: Yuri Bezmenov [Conservative Compass Photo]

 

The 4 Techniques of Ideological Subversion: Active Measures

 

According to Bezmenov, this process is a long-term strategy divided into four stages, designed to weaken and destabilize a nation from within, making it vulnerable to control or influence without resorting to military confrontation. The stages are:

 

1. Demoralization: This initial phase involves the gradual undermining of a nation's cultural values, integrity, and unity, lasting over a period of 15-20 years, which Bezmenov noted as the minimum amount of time required to educate one generation of students in the target country. The demoralization process focuses on influencing the cultural, religious, and educational institutions, distorting historical narratives, and promoting a negative view of the nation's history and heritage. The aim is to erode citizens' faith in their country, its government, and each other.

 

2. Destabilization: In the second stage, the focus shifts to destabilizing the nation's economy, foreign relations, and defense systems. This involves promoting social unrest and creating divisions within the society, encouraging opposition to the government, and exploiting problems like economic disparities and racial tensions. The goal of destabilization is to create an atmosphere of uncertainty and fear, making it easier to manipulate public opinion and government policy.

 

3. Crisis: The crisis phase involves the creation of a situation that leads to a significant change in power or structure within the target nation. This could be a violent change, such as a revolution or coup, or it could manifest as a significant political shift that aligns the country more closely with the ideology of the subverter. The crisis is designed to bring about a level of chaos and disorder that demands a resolution, which the subverter can provide or influence.

 

4. Normalization: The final stage, normalization, occurs after a new government is in place or significant policy changes have been enacted that align with the subverter's goals. This phase is characterized by the stabilization of the society under the new conditions, with the subverter's influence deeply embedded in the nation's institutions and policies. The term "normalization" is used ironically, as it refers to the acceptance of a new status quo that is fundamentally altered and controlled by external forces.

 

Bezmenov emphasized that the success of these techniques relies on the subverter's ability to operate covertly and manipulate the target society's perceptions and beliefs over an extended period. The ultimate objective is to weaken the target from within, making it incapable of resisting annexation or control by the subverter. It's important to note that while Bezmenov's descriptions provide insight into Cold War-era tactics, the concepts of ideological subversion and active measures have broader applications and can be observed in various forms of international relations and geopolitical strategies beyond the context of the Soviet Union.

 

Now, you can argue that there is no possible way that the crumbling Soviet Union could pull off such a wide scale subversion of our country. In fact, I would probably agree with you. Even though, our history over the past 40 years, certainly reflects many of the goals of the program that Bezmenov described. We have certainly seen the effects of stage 1 & 2 of Ideological Subversion become quite successful. The demoralization and destabilization of America is in full effect. Some may even argue that COVID-19 (Which began in Soviet China) is the perfect example of stage 3, Crisis. It weakened the Trump Administration enough that Joe Biden was able to some to power and begin stage 4, Normalization…

 

Fighting Back: Is it too Late?

Masked & Gloved Fighter - Photo by Katerina Kerdi on Unsplash [Conservative Compass Photo from Unsplash]

 

Fighting back against ideological subversion, especially in the normalization phase, requires us to make an effort. This phase is marked by the widespread acceptance of altered cultural and political norms, making resistance more complex but not impossible. Patriots have to do more than just write a tweet or complain on social media. We have to do MORE! Here are several strategies that can be employed to counteract this subversion:

 

1. Education and Awareness: Educate the public about the tactics and stages of ideological subversion. Awareness is a powerful tool. By understanding the methods used to manipulate societal norms and values, individuals and communities can become more resistant to such influences. This includes promoting critical thinking skills and teaching the history of subversive tactics in schools and through media.

 

2. Reaffirm National Values: Emphasize and reinforce the foundational values and principles that define the nation. This can involve a renewed focus on national history, cultural heritage, and the core values that unite the society. Celebrating the achievements and positive aspects of a nation's history can help rebuild a sense of pride and unity.

 

3. Strengthening Institutions: Work towards the integrity and independence of key institutions, including the educational system, the press, and the judiciary. Ensuring these institutions function without undue influence is crucial for maintaining a society's resilience against subversion. Encouraging transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct within these institutions can help restore public trust.

 

4. Promote Open and Free Dialogue: Encourage open discussions and the free exchange of ideas. A healthy society can debate and discuss different viewpoints without resorting to censorship or suppression. Creating platforms for dialogue helps to prevent the monopolization of the narrative by any single group or ideology.

 

5. Enhance Social Cohesion: Work on bridging divides within society by promoting inclusivity and understanding among different social, ethnic, and political groups. Activities that bring communities together, foster mutual respect, and emphasize common goals can counteract efforts to destabilize society.

 

6. Cybersecurity and Information Integrity: In the digital age, much of the subversive activity takes place online. Strengthening cybersecurity measures and promoting digital literacy can help protect against misinformation and foreign influence operations. Supporting independent and fact-based journalism is also crucial in this regard.

 

7. Engage in Counter-Subversion: Identify and expose foreign influence operations and propaganda efforts. This can be done through intelligence and counterintelligence efforts, as well as through public diplomacy that counters false narratives with truth and factual information.

 

8. Policy and Legislation: Implement policies and legislation that protect against foreign interference in domestic affairs. This includes laws that regulate foreign funding of political campaigns, lobbying efforts, and media operations.

 

All of these strategies must be a ground up movement. We can not rely on political leaders to take this on. At least not until they recognize the power of the movement. We have, at least, 40 years of subversion and programming to dismantle. It will not be an easy or short process, but it must start immediately if we hope to save this country.

 

Conclusion

 

This war has been active for decades with no opposition. We can’t afford to ignore it any longer. At this point, it doesn’t even need to be maintained by those who created it. Each year, more and more people are being indoctrinated by others who were indoctrinated before them. There isn’t some cabal of men in a dark lit room controlling this. It is a many-headed hydra that has to be battled with the truth. Now that you have read this article, you can’t claim ignorance anymore. I try to maintain a balanced perspective in my writing, but on this topic I can not. We stand in the breach here and now. Will you fight or falter? The choice is yours.

 

© 2024 Dallas Ludlum

The Conservative Compass HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT The Conservative Compass

 

++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov - Psychological Warfare Subversion Control of Western Society (COMPLETE)

Posted by SlantRight2

First Published February 27th, 2024 18:25 UTC

 

I cannot recall how I acquired this 1:03:15-Hour clip of Yuri Bezmenov (a 1970s defector from now defunct USSR Communism) lecturing on the Soviet Agenda to use Psych-Warfare on Western Society. I decided to post on my Bitchute Channel in conjunction to a David Ludlum essay read posted on 2/26/24 entitled, “The Secret War: A Silent Attack on America's Soul” (https://tinyurl.com/ynefhvts).


Tuesday, December 12, 2023

DO NOT COMPLY is the First Option

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© December 12, 2023

 

If you’ve read my posts, you aware of my opinion (or is it FACT!) that the U.S. Government has become so corrupted by an UNELECTED Globalist/Marxist Elitist Bureaucracy that it is completely untrustworthy to fulfill its Constitutional Duty to the American Public.

 

AND IF our Government is corrupted as I assert, then that means when any so-called instructions issued to the American Public is more than likely based on a LIE with an agenda to manipulate the minds of citizens to comply to some form Un-American Globalist agenda that benefits the Elitist Few and NOT the Liberty-Freedom of the American masses.

 

I am sharing posts that highlight the influence of government corruption and lying to manipulate YOU as a citizen to comply to the will of the few:

 

§  Dr. Mattias Desmet: Technocratic Totalitarianism: The Importance of Truth Speech. The parallel Rise of Propaganda-dependent Elites and Lonely Masses, and need for a new type of politician; By ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS; Who is Robert Malone (Substack); 12/11/23

 

§  DailyClout Wholly Erased All at Once from Facebook, Instagram; Users Receive Threatening Messages: A Massive Censorship Attack on Us -- One Day after my @WarRoom Interview Explaining mRNA Vaccine-Caused "Frameshifting" has 720,000 Views; By DR NAOMI WOLF; Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf (Substack); 12/11/23

 

§  How to Demoralize a Nation; By LILY; A Lily Bit (Substack); 12/11/23

 

The commonality among these posts is mass manipulation, populace control and restricting truthful information to maintain mass docility. SO I SAY – DO NOT COMPLY!

 

I JUST REALIZED this is going to be a LONG-READ post. If you are in a time constraint situation you might want to bookmark it and return as your time permits. OR if you have a particular affinity to a topical-subject or author, you can click the above embedded links and go directly to the Substack page you are most interested in reading.

 

JRH12/12/23

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

************************

Dr. Mattias Desmet: Technocratic Totalitarianism

The Importance of Truth Speech. The parallel Rise of Propaganda-dependent Elites and Lonely Masses, and need for a new type of politician.

 

Dr. Mattias Desmet at ICS4 (Who is Robert Malone Photo)

 

By ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS

December 11, 2023

Who is Robert Malone

 

Bitchute VIDEO: Dr. Mattias Desmet (Technocratic Totalitarianism) - ICS4 11-2023

[Posted by SlantRight2

First Published December 12th, 2023 15:58 UTC

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

In my opinion, one of the more important speeches provided at the recent Fourth International COVID/Crisis Summit, held last November 2023 in Bucharest Romania, was delivered by my friend and colleague Dr. Mattias Desmet. Many but perhaps not all readers of this substack will be familiar with his groundbreaking synthesis published under the title “Psychology of Totalitarianism”. Others may recall my discussing Mattias’ theories and insights on various podcasts and with Mr. Joe Rogan, and the subsequent censorship response by Google and others when the terms “Mass Formation” and “Mass Formation Psychosis” were suddenly and explosively trending.

 

Dr. Desmet, Dr. Jill Glasspool-Malone and I have spent many hours together since then, in our home, in his home, in Spain shooting the “Headwinds” films which were broadcast by the Epoch Times, visiting mutual friends, and in conferences such as ICS IV. I worked hard to make it possible for him to attend that meeting while maintaining his teaching schedule. He writes to me that there has been a concerted effort to convince him that I am “controlled opposition”, and to convince that he should disassociate from me. But, unfortunately for the propagandists and chaos agents, that is unlikely to happen as we have spent these many hours building a collaborative friendship and have been through thick and thin together. I steadfastly supported him through the academic attacks he has had, helped him build his substack following, and defended him when the Breggins maliciously attacked and defamed him.

 

These many concerted censorship and defamation attacks have taken a toll on him, as they have on me, but we both remain standing and continue our efforts to discern truth through the fog of the psychological war, the fifth generation warfare, which swirls around us.

 

Mattias is now focusing on his next book, which looks forward towards how we can win the PsyWay battle for our minds, thoughts and souls being waged against all of us by globalist Elites. As I listened to his speech at the ICS IV, I was amazed at how his thinking has continued to mature, and by the clarity of his thought and insights.

 

Strangely, a few minutes into his speech the video feed cut out, and those watching the streaming video were not able to see what I was watching in person. Returning to the USA, his was among the first that I wanted to transcribe and post to this substack, together with those of MEP Christian TerhesDr. Harvey RischDr. Jill Glasspool-Malone, and Dr. Denis Rancourt. But no-one seemed to be able to find or recover video or even audio recordings of Mattias’ speech.

 

Finally, a recording was identified, and has now been uploaded both above and at the ICS IV website. Since that time, recordings of some of these speeches have been removed from youtube, and there have been efforts by unknown actors to even remove material from the ICS IV website archives. If you are interested in any of this material, you may wish to view and/or download copies sooner rather than later, or they may become scrubbed from digital history as has been happening with so many key resources concerning the global mismanagement of the COVIDcrisis.

 

The history of the CIA since its founding is intimately wrapped up in Operation Mockingbird, a concerted campaign continuously developed since the 1940s to control US and global media, reporting (and “reporters”), and academia. Together with MI5/MI6 in the UK, this “Mighty Wurlitzer” has been used to shape a narrative - a series of carefully promoted US Government lies - which have dominated the worldview of literally all western nation citizens. As Mattias explains in this lecture, the continuing advancement of these propaganda capabilities have been considered necessary to prop up, “legitimize” and provide cover for a wide range of nefarious, self-serving actions on the part of a very small group of hereditary “Elites” who have sought to control the peoples, governments and economies of the world- at the expense of the interests of humanity at large. The rest of us have paid an enormous price in suffering and psychological damage, which is rooted in a sense of disaffection from each other and society - loneliness.

 

Perhaps one of the most positive aspects of the COVIDcrisis is that many, including myself and perhaps also yourself, have become aware that we are being manipulated, lied to, and forced to comply with the wishes of these Globalist Elites who exert their will via force, violence, and coercion on a global scale. The work of reporters Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi (The Racket News) and so many others have picked up where Carl Bernstein once left off in documenting the Censorship-Industrial complex. We now have the documents and receipts demonstrating how thoroughly we have all been played. The question now is what to do about it.

 

In his speech at ICS IV, Dr. Desmet provides a glimpse into his prescription for healing those of us who have damaged, and his vision for how we can recover our sovereignty, personal psychological autonomy, and rebuild a more functional society devoid of the nefarious hidden hand of Elite-sponsored propaganda and psychological manipulation.

 

I heartily recommend reviewing and carefully considering his thoughts, and I eagerly look forward to his new book in which he provides further details.

 

^^^^^

 

Dear friends,

 

A few weeks ago I gave a speech at the fourth International Crisis Summit in the Romanian Parliament. Below you find the text of the speech I prepared and the video recording of the speech I actually gave. I usually don't prepare a speech, simply because for some reason I never stick to the plan. Ultimately, I always express the words as they come on the spot and at the moment. This time was no different – the text below and the actual speech are different. That being said, I hope you will read it. In the beginning I repeat some things about totalitarianism that you might be familiar with if you've listened to my interviews. But the rest of the text is all about the perversion of political discourse in our society and the need for a new type of politician who leaves propaganda and rhetoric behind and re-appreciates truth speech.

 

Warm wishes,

Mattias

 

^^^^^

 

Prepared Remarks

 

Dear members of the Romanian parliament,

Dear audience,

Dear ladies and gentlemen,

 

As some of you might know, I wrote a book, titled The Psychology of Totalitarianism. It is about a new kind of totalitarianism that is emerging now, a totalitarianism which is not so much a communist or fascist totalitarianism, but a technocratic totalitarianism.

 

I have articulated my theory on totalitarianism on so many occasions. I will only present the gist of it here and move on to a problem which is particularly relevant for an address in a political institution such as this parliament: the perversion of political discourse in the Enlightenment tradition.

 

Here is in a nutshell what I articulated on totalitarianism throughout the last years: totalitarianism is not a coincidence. It is a logical consequence of our materialist-rationalist view on man and the world. When this view on man and the world became dominant, as a spontaneous consequence, a new elite ánd a new population emerged. A new elite that excessively used propaganda as a means to control and steer the population; and a population which lapsed more and more into loneliness and disconnectedness, both from its social and its natural environment.

 

These two evolutions, the emergence of an elite that uses propaganda and a lonely population, reinforced each other. The lonely state is exactly the state in which a population is vulnerable for propaganda. In this way, a new kind of masses or crowds emerged throughout the last two centuries: the so-called lonely masses.

 

People fall prey to mass formation to escape a pervasive feeling of loneliness and disconnectedness, induced by the rationalization of the world and the ensuing industrialization of the world and the excessive use of technology. They merge together in fanatic mass behavior because this seems to free them from their lonely, atomized state.

 

And that is exactly the big illusion of mass formation: belonging to a mass doesn’t liberate a human being from its lonely state. Not at all. A mass is a group that is formed, not because individuals connect to each other, but because each individual separately is connected to a collective ideal. The longer a mass formation exists, the more solidarity they feel for the collective and the less solidarity and love they feel for other individuals. That’s exactly why in the end stage of mass formation and totalitarianism, every individual reports every other individual to the collective, or to the state, if they think that other individual is not loyal enough to the state. And in the end, the unthinkable happens, with mothers reporting their children to the state and children their parents.

 

The lonely masses distinguish themselves in several respects from the physical masses of earlier times: they can be much better controlled, they are less unpredictable than physical masses, and they last longer, in particular if they are constantly fed by propaganda through mass-media. The creation of long lasting lonely masses through propaganda was the psychological basis for the emergence of the large totalitarian systems of the twentieth century. Only if a mass formation exists for decades can it be made the basis of a state system.

 

The emergence of lonely masses led to Stalinism and Nazism in the beginning of the twentieth century and now it might lead to technocratic totalitarianism. I described the psychological processes involved in the emergence of lonely masses on many occasions, and I won’t repeat it here.

 

Today, here, in the Romanian parliament, a political institution, I address politicians. I want to tell you that politicians have a particular responsibility in these times of emerging totalitarianism. Totalitarianism, as Hannah Arendt said, is a diabolic pact between the masses and the political elites. Political elites need to contemplate –scrutinize the ethical qualities of their speech. There is something wrong with political discourse. This is what I intend to say: political discourse is perverted.

 

For instance, we got used to the fact that politicians, once they are elected, never do what they promised to do in their election speeches. How far are we removed from political virtue as described by Aristotle. For Aristotle, the core of political virtue was the courage to speak the Truth, or, to use the Greek term, Parrhesia, bold speech, in which someone says exactly this what society doesn’t want to hear, but which is necessary to keep it psychologically healthy.

 

I am not so much accusing individual politicians here; I am addressing political culture in general. And even more, I am talking about a perversion that is inherent to the entire tradition of Enlightenment. Our society is in the grip of a specific type of lying, a kind of lying that is historically speaking relatively new, that emerged for the first time after the French revolution, when the religious view on man and the world was replaced by our current, rationalist-materialist worldview. What am I talking about when I refer to this ‘new kind of lie’? I am talking about the phenomenon of ‘propaganda’.

 

Propaganda is everywhere around us. Public space is saturated with it. Recent years have illustrated that abundantly, during the coronacrisis, during the Ukraine crisis, and now, even more clearly, during the coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict on both mainstream and social media.

 

It is not that I do not understand the motivation of those who choose for propaganda. They often start from good intentions. Or at least: somewhere, they do believe in their good intentions. Read the work of the founding fathers of propaganda, such as Lippman, Trotter and Bernays. They believe that the only way for the leaders to keep control in society and to prevent society of lapsing into chaos is propaganda. The leaders cannot overtly impose their will anymore to the population. Nobody would accept that within a materialist-rationalist society. Hence, the only way to make the population do what the leaders want, is to make them do what the leaders want without them knowing that they do what the leaders want. In others words: the only way to control the population is through manipulation.

 

The people in favor of propaganda will argue that we can never tackle the challenges of climate change and viral outbreaks through democratic means. They will ask: ‘Do you think people will voluntarily give up their cars and flying holidays? To escape disaster, we need technocracy, a society led by technical experts, and to install technocracy, we need to mislead the population, we need to manipulate them into technocracy’.

 

First of all, I want to tell you that I don’t believe technocracy is a solution to the problem. But that’s not what matters most. Let me tell you something: to try to create a good society for the human being through manipulation, is a contradictio in terminis. The essence and core of a good society is exactly the ethical quality of public discourse. Man, in the end, essentially is an ethical being, and to pervert man’s speech is to pervert man itself; to pervert political speech is to pervert society itself.

 

To give up sincerity in order to create a good society, is to try to build a good society by giving up immediately, from the beginning, the essence of a good society (!). Truthful speech is not a means towards an end, it is the end in itself; sincere speech is what makes us human and humane.

 

This is crucial to understand: propaganda is not a historical coincidence, it is a structural consequence of rationalism. If you consider the psychological structure of our current society, it’s fair to say that propaganda is the major guiding principle. In a remarkable way, the pursuit of rationality during the tradition of Enlightenment didn’t lead to more Truthful speech, as the founding fathers of this tradition believed. Science would replace questionable religious and other myths; society would finally be organized according to reliable information instead of subjective conjectures. Now, a few centuries later, this turned out to be an illusion. There has never been as much unreliable information as now in public space.

 

The materialist-rationalist view on man and the world, in a strange way, rather led to the opposite of what it expected. As soon as we started to conceive the human being as a mechanistic, biological entity, for whom the highest attainable goal was survival, it became rather unfashionable to try to speak the Truth. Speaking the Truth, the Ancient Greeks knew that very well, doesn’t maximize your chances on survival. The Truth is always risky. ‘No one is hated more than he who speaks the Truth’, Plato said. Hence, within a materialist-rationalist tradition, speaking the Truth is something stupid to do. Only idiots do it. That’s how the fanatic pursuit of rationality led us astray, straight into the dark wood of Dante, ‘where the right road is wholly lost and gone’.

 

This materialist-rationalist view on man and the world – why do we actually cling to it? It loves to present itself as the scientific view on man and the world. Let me tell you that this is nonsense. All seminal scientist concluded exactly the opposite: in the end, the essence of life always escapes rationality, it transcends the categories of rational thinking. To name only one major scientist: in the preface of a book of Max Planck, Einstein claimed that it is a mistake to believe that science originates from supreme logical-rational thinking; it originates from what he called a capacity for ‘einfühlung’ in the object one investigates, which means as much as ‘a capacity to empathically resonate with the object you are investigating’.

 

Rationality is a good thing and we need to walk the path of rationality as far as possible, but it is not the end goal. Rational knowledge is not a goal in itself; it is a stairway to a kind of knowledge that transcends rationality, a resonating knowledge, the kind of supreme intuition the martial arts of the Samurai culture aimed for throughout their technical training. It is at that level that we can situate the phenomenon of Truth.

 

This brings us closer to an answer to the question: what is the remedy to the disease of totalitarianism? Can we do something about totalitarianism? My answer is simple and straight: yes. The powerless do have power.

 

Propaganda induced mass formation is a fake, symptomatic solution for loneliness. And the real solution lies in the Art of Sincere Speech. My next book, which I am writing now, is all about the psychology of Truth. Truth, by definition, from a psychological point of view, is resonating speech, it is speech which connects people, from core to core, from soul to soul, speech that penetrates through the veil of appearances, through the ideal images we hide behind, the imaginary shells we seek refuge in, and reconnects the shivering and disconnected soul of one human being to that of another human being.

 

Here we observe something crucial: sincere speech is the real cure for loneliness – it reconnects people. As such, it takes away the root cause of the major symptom of our rationalist culture – mass formation and totalitarianism. And at the same time, sincere speech also inhibits this symptom in a more straightforward way. It is well known that, if there are some people who continue to speak in a sincere way when mass formation is emerging, the masses do not go to the ultimate stage where they start to think it is their duty to destroy each and everyone who doesn’t follow the totalitarian ideology.

 

At every moment we chose to speak out in a sincere way, no matter where this happens, in a newspaper or a television interview, but equally well in the presence of only one other person at the kitchen table or in the supermarket, we help to cure society from the disease of totalitarianism.

 

You have to take this literally. Society, as a psychological system, is a complex dynamical system. And complex dynamical systems have the fascinating characteristic of so-called sensitivity to initial conditions. To put it simple: the smallest changes in one minor detail of the system, affect the entire system. For instance, the smallest change in the vibration pattern of one water molecule in a boiling pot of water, changes the entire convection pattern of the boiling water.

 

Nobody is powerless. And hence, every single one of us is responsible. Each and everyone who speaks a sincere word and succeeds in truly connecting as a human being to another human being, in particular a human being with a different opinion, deserves to be mentioned in the books of history, much more than a president or a minister who engages in propaganda and fails to show the courage to speak sincerely.

 

The more I study the effects of speech on the human being and on human living together, the more hopeful I become and the more I see that we will overcome totalitarianism.

 

We shouldn’t be naïve when we talk about the Truth. Endless are the atrocities in history committed by people who believed they possessed the Truth. Truth is an elusive phenomenon; we can enjoy its presence from time to time, but we can never claim it or possess it.

 

Sincere speech is an art. An art we have to learn step by step. An art we can progressively master. That’s exactly why I started workshops on the Art of Speech – workshops in which we practice that art in the same perseverant, disciplined way as any other art is practiced.

 

Practicing this art implies that we overcome our own fanatic convictions, and even more, our own narcissism and ego. Truth speech is this kind of speech which penetrates through what I call ‘the veil of appearances’. To practice it, you have to be willing to sacrifice your ideal image; your public reputation. That is exactly what the Parrhesia in Ancient Greek culture meant: speaking out, even if you know that those who find their stronghold in the world of appearances will target you.

 

Truth-telling can make you lose something. That is for sure. But it also gives you something. To be more psychologically precise: Truth speech makes you lose something at the level of the Ego and win something at the level of the soul. I am quite fascinated by the way in which sincere speech leads to psychological strength.

 

I think Mahatma Gandhi provides us with a splendid historical example. A few years ago, I started to read his autobiography. I did so at the moment I started to realize that the only efficient resistance against totalitarianism is non-violent resistance. Of course this only applies to internal resistance, resistance from within the totalitarian system. External enemies can destroy totalitarian systems from without. That’s for sure.

 

But internal resistance, as I mentioned, can only be successful if it is non-violent in nature. All violent resistance will rather speed up the process of totalitarization, just because it is always used by the totalitarian leaders to create support in the masses to destroy each and everyone who goes against the system. Once I realized that, I became interested in what Gandhi had to say in his autobiography.

 

I was happily surprised to see the title: Experiments on Truth. And from the first pages, I learned that for Gandhi, the core and essence of non-violent resistance is sincere speech. His entire life, Gandi tried to improve the sincerity of his speech. He did so in a simple, almost childish and naïve way, wondering every evening how sincere he had spoken that day, where he had lied or when he could have spoken more accurately or sincerely.

 

And here is something important: in the beginning of his biography, Gandhi mentions something magnificent. He says: I actually had no major talents. I was not handsome as a man, I didn’t have much physical strength, I was not intelligent at school, I was not a good writer and I was not talented as a speaker. But he had this passion for sincerity and Truth. And this man, devoid of any major talents, but with a passion for sincere speech, this man did something even the strongest army in the world couldn’t do: he kicked out the English of India.

 

The better you start to see the almost endless horizon of possibilities offered by speech, the more you realize: it are words that rule the world. The human being can use words in a manipulative way, as pure rhetoric, indoctrination, propaganda, or brain-washing trying to convince the Other of something it doesn’t believe in itself. Or it can use words in a sincere way, trying to convey something to a fellow human being it feels inside itself. That is the most fundamental and existential choice human beings face: to use words in one or the other way.

 

Dear politicians of Romania and abroad, this is what I want to tell you today: it’s time for a metaphysical revolution. And you are ought to play a major role in it. The series of crises our society goes through are nothing else than a metaphysical revolution, which, essentially, boils down to this: the switch from a society that functions according to the propaganda principle to a society that is oriented towards Truth. We need a new political culture, a culture that re-appreciates the value of Truth Telling. We need a new political discourse, a political discourse that leaves the shallow, hollow rhetorics and propaganda behind and speaks from the soul, from the heart; we need politicians to become true leaders again, leaders who lead rather than mis-lead the population.

 

^^^^^

 

Transcript of Speech

Dr. Mattias Desmet (00:12):

 

Some of you might know me. I wrote this book titled The Psychology of Totalitarianism, a book in which I warned about two years ago that we have seen the collapse of fascist and Nazi totalitarianism in the 20th century, but that we might be at risk of ending up in a new kind of totalitarianism now, which is technocratic in nature, technocratic totalitarianism. I'm sure I'm telling nothing new to the people here, but for some other people this was quite shocking. Meanwhile, they banned my book at the Ghent University where I work as a professor from using it in my classes. So it's a little bit strange to ban a book on... In which there is one for totalitarianism at the university, but they did so.

 

(01:05):

 

Well, I will tell you in a nutshell what my final analysis was on totalitarianism. I concluded in my book that totalitarianism ultimately is rooted in our materialist rationalist view on man and the world, which emerged or became dominant in our society about two centuries ago, and which put in motion at least two processes, one at the level of the elite and one at the level of the population. The new elite that emerged starting from the French Revolution onwards, I think made excessive use of propaganda to keep control over society. And throughout the last 200 years, propaganda became ever and always more important for the elite to steer society, to keep control of the population. And you can explain that which I won't do now.

 

(02:10):

 

But in a psychological way, this is a straightforward consequence of a rationalist view on man in the world, I think the fact that the elite used more and more propaganda. And at the same time at least as important, was that there was a very strange evolution at the level of the population, the psychology of the population. Throughout the last few hundreds of years, more and more people started to feel lonely. They started to feel disconnected, disconnected from their fellow human beings and disconnected from their social environment. And the combination of the two, the emergence of an elite which used more and more propaganda and the emergence of a lonely population reinforced each other in a strange way. The lonely state, if a population is in a lonely state, then she is extremely vulnerable for propaganda.

 

(03:07):

 

So we had on the one hand, an elite who used more and more propaganda, who relied more and more on propaganda to keep control in the population, which became more and more vulnerable to it. And it was this combination of this elite and this population that led to what Hannah Arendt called the diabolic pact between the masses and the elite, the diabolic pact that ended up in the emergence of a completely new kind of state in the 20th century, the totalitarian state. That's in a nutshell my analysis of the problem we find ourselves in now. And at the moment, I'm writing a new book in which I do not so much focus on the problem, but in which I try to focus on the solution.

 

(03:54):

 

Can we do something about it? Can we do something about this emergent totalitarianism? I think we can. I really believe we can. And the longer I think about it, the more convinced I am that we can and that we shall find a solution. I think to put it in a nutshell, very concisely, totalitarianism in the first place is a psychological problem. It's a psychological problem and the solution at a psychological level for totalitarianism is the rediscovery and the reappreciation in our culture, which is sick of propaganda, this new kind of lie that emerged about two centuries ago. Before the French Revolution, there was no such thing as propaganda as we know it now. Well, the solution for the disease of this society in a certain way, it's very logical, is the rediscovery and the reappreciation of what I call truth-telling, true-speech, sincere-speech. My new book is about the psychology of truth, psychology of sincere-speech, and you can clearly see that truth-speech in the first place is resonating speech.

 

(05:00):

 

It's a kind of speech that connects people from soul to soul, from core to core. I will describe this in a very technical and concrete manner in my new book. So in this way you can see two things. If you consider mass formation and totalitarianism to be the ultimate symptom of our enlightenment tradition, the ideology of reason, of our rationalist view on men in the world, then you can see that truth-speech or sincere-speech both inhibits the symptom and takes away the root cause of the symptom. And there's a respect that it's well known since the 19th century that if a mass formation, the crowd formation emerges in a society. And there are people, there are some people who continue to speak in a sincere way and they will usually not succeed in waking up the masses, but they will make sure that the masses don't go to this ultimate stage where they start to be convinced that they have to destroy and eliminate each and every one who doesn't go along with them.

 

(06:06):

 

That's the first thing. Sincere-speech, you can understand that logically and you can prove it empirically inhibits the symptom, it inhibits mass formation. And at the same time, true-speech as a kind of resonating speech, as a kind of connecting speech takes away is the real solution for the root cause of the problem, namely the loneliness. True-speech, sincere-speech is what really connects people to each other. Mass formation in the first place seems to take away the loneliness. Lonely people become sensitive and vulnerable for mass formation because as soon as they start to belong to a mass, they feel not lonely anymore. But that's an illusion.

 

(06:53):

 

A mass is a group that is formed not because individuals connect to each other, but because they all connect to a collective ideal. And the longer the mass formation exists, the more solidarity is sucked away from the relationship between individuals and injected in the relationship between the individual and the collective, meaning that in the end people feel much, much more love and solidarity for the collective than for other individuals. And in the final stage, this leads to this jarring situation in which parents start to report their children to the state. And the other way around, children start to report their parents to the state just because even the solidarity with their parents becomes less strong than the solidarity with the collective. So you can understand that perfectly if you understand the psychological mechanism of mass formation.

 

(07:49):

 

I think that the better you understand the psychological mechanisms involved, the better you see that truth-speech or sincere-speech indeed is the solution and that we are all responsible for contributing to the solution to the problem of totalitarianism. Society as a psychological system is always is a complex dynamical system, literally. And complex dynamical systems in nature always have this fascinating characteristic of sensitivity to initial conditions, meaning that at a small change in a minor detail of the system has an impact on the entire system. For instance, a small change in the vibration pattern of one water molecule changes the entire convection pattern in a boiling pot of water. And in the same way, a minor sincere word spoken will have an impact on the entire society.

 

(08:51):

 

So we all have the responsibility to speak out and no matter where. We can do it in a television program, in a newspaper, but also at the kitchen table and in the supermarket. Also there, we will have an impact on the entire system. We can all contribute to the solution. We shouldn't feel powerless. We all have power and that makes us all responsible. We should all do our best no matter where we are to speak out in a sincere way and maybe to really try to learn the art of truth-speech. I don't think we should think in a naive way about truth. Thinking in a naive way about truth has caused a lot of trouble in this world, I think. Truth is something elusive, something that we can be in the presence of for a moment, but that we can never possess. Truth-speech is an art, an art we can learn and we should try to learn it because I think it's the only way out of totalitarianism. If you want to... One of the best examples, I think one of the most inspiring examples at that level is Mahatma Gandhi, I think.

 

(10:00):

 

A few years ago I started to be interested in nonviolent resistance because I know that resistance inside of a totalitarian system can only be successful if it is nonviolent. That's something very typical for resistance against totalitarian systems. And that's why I started to read the autobiography of Mahatma Gandhi. And the first thing I learned there was that Mahatma Gandhi considered sincere-speech to be the core and the essence of nonviolent resistance. And he mentioned something wonderful in the introduction of his book. He says, "I had no major talents at all. I was not handsome, I was not physically strong, I was not intelligent at school. I was not a good writer and I was not a good speaker, but I had this passion for truth-speech," He said, for sincere-speech. And time and time again, day after day, he tried to become more honest and more sincere every evening, admitting for himself. If he lied that day or if he could have been spoken in a more sincere way, then he did.

 

(11:01):

 

And in this way, this man, without any great talent became the most powerful man of India. He did something that even the strongest army in the world couldn't do at that moment. He kicked out the English of India and that's what we can do as well. Even a small minority of us is sufficient if we are determined and dedicated to truth and to sincerity, to break the power of the most impressive propaganda system the world have ever seen. We can and will and must do it. I think there are very hopeful historical examples of minorities, of people who changed the world, who changed the world.

 

(11:40):

 

I'd like to give only one example, Friedrich Nietzsche, the German philosopher thought that 100 people had been sufficient to change medieval society in the society of the Renaissance. The same can happen now. We are at the verge of a big metaphysical revolution, I think to use a concept of Michel Houellebecq. A revolution, which in the end boils down to this. We have to change from a society which is based on the organizing principle of propaganda, to society which is based on the organizing principle of sincerity. And I think each and every one of us who is here can contribute to it. And I hope we will all do so. Thanks.

 

© 2023 Robert W Malone, MD

Who is Robert Malone HOMEPAGE

SUPPORT/SUBSCRIBE to Who is Robert Malone

 

++++++++++++++++++++

DailyClout Wholly Erased All at Once from Facebook, Instagram; Users Receive Threatening Messages

A Massive Censorship Attack on Us -- One Day after my @WarRoom Interview Explaining mRNA Vaccine-Caused "Frameshifting" has 720,000 Views

 

By DR NAOMI WOLF

December 11, 2023

Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf

 

DailyClout contributors and readers discovered yesterday, Dec 10, 2023, that Facebook has removed all of DailyClout’s content, both articles and videos, or marked it all as Spam. This scorched-earth erasure was applied to DailyClout — and to my own — content, posted as far back as September 2022.

 

Facebook also blocked readers from sharing DailyClout content, and the platform told readers and contributors that they were violating Facebook’s terms of service if they shared our posts. Users get messages warning them of various terms of service violations that include “terrorism”.

RiaDelRio X-Tweet about DailyClout Censored

 

In the case of Instagram, not only were our contributors’ accounts restricted, but the word ‘DailyClout’ itself was deleted from their bios, though they had taken no such action.

 

We know from lawsuits by two US Attorneys General that the White House and CDC already pressured Facebook to censor accurate information I’d posted in 2021, related to menstrual damage from mRNA vaccines. I was blocked from Facebook intermittently for months after that. Due to these prior acts of censorship by Facebook, millions of women have been prevented from learning about potential damage to their bodies and to their fertility — damage which they now suffer as a result of that suppression.

 

Facebook’s and Instagram’s censorship of DailyClout — and of me personally — yesterday followed my posting of an interview I did with Steve Bannon on his widely viewed podcast WarRoom, in which I explained that scientists had confirmed that the mRNA injections cause ‘frameshifting’, or the production of ‘nonsense’ proteins, with unknown outcomes. It reached 720,000 views on Twitter. (I cannot open it on Rumble).

 

https://twitter.com/naomirwolf/status/1733508874412401111

 

[Dr Naomi Wolf X-Tweet Screengrab 12/9/23]

 

[Blog Editor: I’m showing the Rumble video referenced I the Tweet. Rumble was the victim of a CCP-cyber attack which might explain the reason Dr. Wolf could not open the Rumble video on 12/11. Rumble seems to have overcome the attack BUT the embed function isn’t working. So here’s the Bitchute version of Bannons War Room:

 

Bitchute VIDEO: DR. NAOMI WOLF: "THE INJECTIONS HAVE AN INGREDIENT IN THEM THAT IS CAUSING FRAMESHIFTING"

Posted by Steve Bannon's War Room

First Published December 8, 2023 23:00 UTC

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

My sources were a December 6 2023 article in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.comN1-Methylpseudouridylation of mRNA Causes +1 Ribosomal Frameshifting,” (Thomas E Mulroney, et al), as well as an earlier report by the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Team. The sources for that report were the Pfizer internal documents released by the FDA under court order. On May 11, 2022, DailyClout had published “Report 22: Effects of N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine in the Pfizer MRNA Vaccine,” linking drectly to the Pfizer documents.

 

My reporting is, once again, correct, and once again, the censored finding, this time of N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine causing protein-related problems, is a matter of public interest.

 

Though much of the documentation of this that was abundant online a year ago has been scrubbed (I reported on it in my previous book The Bodies of Others) — the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation invested in the mRNA vaccines discovery process. Indeed, their list of “COVID-19 Partners” shows Mark Zuckerberg’s investment in and his profiting from every aspect of “lockdowns”; testing and pharmaceutical treatment of COVID; from pumping millions into “partnering” on distance learning and internet connectivity for homebound children, to developing COVID treatments, including vaccines; to the “Chan Zuckerberg Biohub” for COVID testing.

 

If you want to know exactly how the world was “locked down”, profitably tested, profitably distanced, profitably vaccinated, and in the meantime had its DNA harvested — if you want to know who got paid to keep your child home from school for between one and two years of your child’s life, and who paid for those “distancing” educators — look no further than at the “COVID-19 Partners” of “CZI”: https://chanzuckerberg.com/covid-19/partners/. These “Partners” also include those at the center of the catastrophic mRNA vaccine rollout: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Institute and the WHO. “Mark Zuckerberg’s Bid to Get America Vaccinated,” as the Wall Street Journal put it, also profited his own investments.

 

My interview with Steve Bannon reveals one the massive potentially criminal result of this undertaking, which Zuckerberg had so heavily helped to fund and promote.

 

If Mark Zuckerberg’s vaccine investment has helped to produce a process that has gone terribly wrong, the way to address that is by full public disclosure and informed consent for Facebook’s billions of users; and not by censoring journalists who are bringing peer-reviewed findings to his platforms.

 

This action on Zuckerberg’s part — censoring me and DailyClout, and wiping out over a year of our content, and intimidating any user who types in my or DailyClout’s name — damages my company, its shareholders and its advertisers. It also harms our columnists, whose alliance with DailyClout has led to their other business interests being restricted on Zuckerberg’s platforms.

 

He will hear from our lawyers.

 

If Mark Zuckerberg has harmed his users by censoring what are now confirmed to be serious and widespread risks from an mRNA vaccine process in the development of which he invested, he should say so, apologize, and offer to pay his users’ medical bills; rather than doubling down and seeking to prevent Facebook and Instagram users from finding out what was done to them.

 

I hope Facebook’s own users and advertisers consider now whether they wish to align with a brand that shows so little regard for its own customers’ health and wellbeing, and so little respect for accuracy, and that is so willing to misinform its own users, in a way that can injure them, or worse.

 

The thing is, censorship never works. I have been privileged to study the history of censorship, and sooner or later, the truth always comes out. Discussion of discussion of what became Protestantism itself was once censored; discussion of homosexuality was once heavily censored; so was any discussion of birth control. None of that censorship prevented any of these subjects from eventually coming to light.

 

Mr. Zuckerberg’s potential crimes will not stay hidden, just because he has sought to silence me and the posts and videos created by my company. His potential crimes will only, sadly, thus be compounded.

 

To support us, and our censorship suit now against Facebook, and to defend our last freedoms of speech, subscribe to Best of DailyClout now open on Substack, subscribe to DailyClout.io, use our Facebook alternative Communities, and please donate.

 

© 2023 Dr Naomi Wolf

Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf HOMEPAGE

SUBCRIBE/SUPPORT Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++

How to Demoralize a Nation

 

By LILY

December 11, 2023

A Lily Bit

 

[Blog Editor: I uploaded this clip from the A Lily Bit Substack:]

 

Bitchute VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov Warning - A Lily Bit

[Posted by SlantRight2

First Published December 12th, 2023 19:12 UTC

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

In my earlier articles, I often delved into the notion that the aviation industry is facing systemic challenges, leading to a gradual discouragement of flying among the general public. This topic, covered in various articles, includes the idea of potential restrictions on purchasing plane tickets. According to this perspective, only those with a positive environmental track record or deemed 'good citizens' might be eligible to buy flight tickets in the future. While many view this as an unwarranted concern, it's a topic that has been increasingly discussed in relation to environmental policies and their impact on air travel.

 

Considering the gradual recovery of the aviation industry and the consistent rise in demand, it's not unexpected that mainstream media is once again bringing attention to the concept of CO2-passports:


Recently, an article titled “It's Time to Limit the Frequency of Our Trips Abroad - 'CO2 Passports' Might Be the Answer” was published by CNN. The content mirrors the nightmare scenario I once discussed. The article, written by guest commentator Ross Bennett-Cook, a visiting lecturer at the University of Westminster's School of Architecture Cities, proposes the idea of a CO2 passport. This concept involves allocating an annual CO2 limit to each traveler, which they must not exceed. Bennett-Cook suggests that this system could be used to 'ration' travel.

 

“The detrimental impact of tourism on the environment is so significant that some believe drastic changes in our travel habits are inevitable,” writes the visiting lecturer. He refers to a 2023 report on the future of sustainable travel, where the tour operator Intrepid Travel suggests that 'CO2 Passports' might soon become a necessity for the survival of the tourism industry. The fact that a tour operator is proposing such coercive measures for its customers indicates how entire sectors, driven by fear of being perceived as non-progressive or not acting in accordance with the World Economic Forum's playbook, are resorting to self-limiting strategies in the hope of avoiding complete cancellation.

 

Bennett-Cook calculates, “Globally, the average annual CO2 footprint per person is around 4 tons. To prevent global temperatures from rising more than two degrees Celsius, the average global CO2 footprint needs to be reduced to below two tons by 2050.” This reduction is equivalent to two round trips between London and New York. However, the push for change isn't limited to air travel. He notes that cruise ships emit four times more sulfur gases than all of Europe's 291 million cars combined, contributing to acid rain and respiratory diseases. Bennett-Cook warns that vacationers should prepare to modify their travel habits voluntarily before such changes are imposed.

 

While CNN clarifies that this is an opinion piece and does not necessarily reflect the editorial stance, those aware of the network's climate-conscious and progressive reputation might view this statement with skepticism.

 

On MSN, the “news” portal owned by Bill Gates' Microsoft, similar thoughts are being echoed, also referencing the report from the tour operator. An article there poses the question, “Could there be 'CO2 Passports' in the future that restrict our travel allowance?” It goes on to explain, “Theoretically, a CO2 Passport would limit the annual greenhouse gas emissions of travelers.” The article also quotes Alex Hawkins, an editor for strategic future studies at The Future Laboratory, who led the report. Speaking to Business Insider, Hawkins suggested that the concept might become necessary if we fail to work towards a more sustainable world. “The idea of CO2 Passports is based on the notion of personal CO2 certificates,” said Hawkins, adding that this would set a cap on how much CO2 individuals can emit over a certain period.

 

Great Reset Marxism (A Lily Bit Photo)

 

These are communist ideas. I delved into the Soviet Union's long-term strategy before, which was believed to have been conceived by Gorbachev's political mentor, former KGB and later Party leader Yuri Andropov. This strategy aimed to infiltrate and internally dismantle capitalism. Environmental protection, alongside the peace movement, was reportedly one of the Trojan horses the KGB relied on, as defectors have claimed. If one were looking for a lever to shake the foundations of Western industrial society, manipulating the cost of CO2 emissions would have been an ideal tactic, given its integral role in our industry and prosperity.

 

While I'm skeptical that Andropov's plan has been implemented to the letter, it's evident that the seeds planted by the KGB at that time have taken on a life of their own and flourished. Regardless of how much, if any, of Andropov's ideology is embedded in current climate policies, the former Party leader might be metaphorically celebrating the developments. The same goes for the still very much active Communists in China. Concepts like the “CO2 Passport” – and many others – align closely with the spirit of communism, or more precisely, with systems that oppress and patronize people.

 

Youtube VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov: Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society (Complete)

           [Posted by GBPPR2

Posted on Feb 23, 2011

 

Yuri Bezmenov (alias Tomas Schuman), a Soviet KGB defector, explains in detail his scheme for the KGB process of subversion and takeover of target societies at a lecture in Los Angeles, 1983.

 

Yuri Bezmenov was a former KGB propagandist who was assigned to New Dehli, India - and defected to the West in 1970.

 

Bezmenov explains his background, some of his training, and exactly how Soviet propaganda is spread in other countries in order to subvert their teachers, politicians, and other policy makers to a mindset receptive to the Soviet ideology.

 

He also explains in detail the goal of Soviet propaganda as total subversion of another country and the four-step formula for achieving this goal.

 

He recalls the details of how he escaped India, defected to the West, and settled in Montreal as an announcer for the CBC.

 

Note the segments starting at around 14 and 24 minutes into the video.

 

Please mirror this video! Thank you.

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

The communist strategy involved infiltrating universities and then penetrating institutions. KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov notably highlighted that “ideological subversion” was more critical for the Soviet intelligence than traditional espionage, with the KGB dedicating 85% of its resources to this effort. Bezmenov referred to this as “subversion” or “Zersetzung” in German.

 

Bezmenov's description of the Soviet Union's long-term strategy in the 1980s resonates with many aspects of the present day. For example, he spoke of the power structure being gradually eroded by entities and groups lacking both the qualifications and the public's mandate yet still wielding power, effectively eliminating competition.

 

According to Bezmenov, who had worked as a propagandist for the KGB, the goal was “to distort the perception of reality to such an extent that despite the abundance of information, individuals are unable to draw logical conclusions in defending themselves, their families, and their countries.” He described this as a brainwashing process that unfolds very slowly. The first stage is demoralization, taking 15 to 20 years – the time needed to educate generations of students and expose them to the enemy's ideology, in this case, Marxism. This ideology had to be ingrained in the minds of at least three generations without being confronted by Western core values and patriotism.

 

“The outcome is evident in most individuals who graduated from universities in the 1960s,” Bezmenov stated in 1984. “They now occupy positions of power. They are everywhere. And they are contaminated. They've been conditioned to respond in a certain way. It's impossible to convince them of anything, even if you prove that white is white and black is black. You cannot change their worldview and behavior.”

 

Their perspective of the world, he argued, is shaped by ideology, with facts playing no significant role. According to Bezmenov, people who have been “demoralized” are unable to distinguish true information from falsehood. That's why the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To reverse it, you would need another 15 to 20 years to educate new generations with a sense of patriotism and common sense, who would work in the interest of their own country and not in the interest of an ideology.

 

 

How to Establish A Technocracy – 11/13/23

A Lily Bit Photo

 

Currently, we are in the midst of a Great Mental Reset, essential for the lasting acceptance of the world as it emerges from the Great Reset. In contrast, the system in Huxley's “Brave New World” is already established and stable. It's beneficial for us to examine in detail how this was achieved inRead full story

 

According to the KGB defector, the demoralization in America had been more successful than even KGB Chief Andropov could have imagined: “Much of it was self-inflicted by the Americans due to a lack of moral standards.” In other words, the crony capitalist system was more decayed than even Moscow had anticipated.

 

Bezmenov pointed out the significant role of film and television in this “brainwashing” process. He observed, “If you compare movies from the last 20 to 25 years, new films often portray police officers as dumb, aggressive, psychotic, or paranoid. On the other hand, criminals are depicted as nice. They might smoke hashish or inject drugs, but they are fundamentally shown as nice, creative people, unproductive only because society oppresses them. Meanwhile, a Pentagon general is invariably a stupid, war-hungry maniac. A police officer is presented as a pig, who is rude and abuses his power.”

 

The goal, according to Bezmenov, was to foster hatred and distrust towards those who protect citizens and enforce law and order. Moral relativism was a key tool in this long-term strategy. It blurred the lines between good and evil, convincing people that everyone was the same everywhere. Language manipulation was also part of this process, slowly replacing fundamental moral principles so that a criminal was no longer a criminal, but rather a defendant.

 

A key aim of the brainwashing tactics was to instill in people the false notion that all humans are equal: “We, Soviet propagandists, try to push you further in the direction you are already heading. 'Equality, yes! Equality! People are equal!'“ Bezmenov emphasized that there was a deliberate confusion between the concept of equal opportunity, which is positive and necessary, and equality, which actually leads to uniformity.

 

This strategy extended even to the family unit: “The goal is to destabilize relationships even within families. We're witnessing a radicalization of interpersonal relations. No more compromises! Just fight, fight, fight! The normal, traditionally accepted relationships are being destabilized.”

 

Bezmenov warned that when socialist uniformity eventually destroys society, a great disillusionment will set in. There will be dissidents and the discontented, but a de facto socialist regime will not tolerate these voices of opposition, unlike the America of 1984.

 

While I don't necessarily view the World Economic Forum led by Klaus Schwab as a product of the Soviet long-term strategy, it certainly aligns well with it. This is also true for the concept of the “Great Reset” championed by Schwab & Co. today. The Soviet dissident and expert on the communist system, Vladimir Bukovsky, criticized the European Union as a bureaucratic behemoth, likening it to a new Soviet Union. A few years ago, I found his criticism to be exaggerated. Today, unfortunately, I find many of his points more understandable. Something that is very much true for the US, as well.

 

The Soviet Union would be celebrating its 101st anniversary at the end of this month. Its founding spirit, it seems, continues to live on.

 

If you appreciate my articles, please consider giving them a like. It's a simple gesture that doesn't cost you anything, but it goes a long way in promoting this post, combating censorship, and fighting the issues that you are apparently not a big fan of.

 

© 2023 Substack Inc

A Lily Bit HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT A Lily Bit