DONATE

Showing posts with label Yazidis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yazidis. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Intro to ‘America Withdraws From Syria’

Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
By Justin O. Smith
Posted October 22, 2019

President Trump wants to pull out of Syria for the very valid reason of stopping involvement in “endless wars.” The difficulty President Trump is facing is one of our staunchest allies against Islamic terrorism has been a group of stateless Kurds that are located in multiple Muslim nations that include Turkey, Iraq, Iran and of course Syria. The none of those nations have ever had any sympathy for the Kurdish people to form an independent Kurdistan with Turkey being the most vehement AGAINST an independent Kurdistan. Turks and Kurds have ethnic commonality and the Turks have jealously protected their land mass and cultural heritage left over after losing WWI. A Jealousy that during and after WWI has led to genocides of non-Turks residing in former Ottoman Turkey and present Republic of Turkey. Armenian and Greek Christians were the initial genocidal victims. YET because Muslim Kurds did not desire to assimilate to Turkish Islamic culture, Kurds also had and have become victims to Turkish genocidal efforts.


To be realistic though, my guess is Arab and Iranian (history’s Persians) efforts of committing genocide against Kurds has more to do with the lack of power than the lack of will to terminate Kurdish-Cultural Muslims. So, I do have sympathy for stateless Kurds. BUT the problem I have with 21st century Kurds is their independence efforts have been led by Communists. In case you missed the history-memo, Communism is a despotic political movement favoring a State-dominated dictatorship ending political Liberty, Individual Liberty, Religious Liberty (favoring atheism), Market Economies AND not least of all - ENDING National Sovereignty.

The Turks are going to exterminate any people they feel is a threat to Turkish-Muslim Culture. That includes Christians, Jews, Shi’ites (primarily Iranian threats) and sadly stateless Communist-oriented Kurds fight for independence which would include some Turkish territory.

Supporting today’s Kurds is a complicated proposition. Here are some titles that might lead President Trump to say something like, “Forget about it!”:


·       The Kurdish People: A Background and History; By Matthew Hand and Mark Brockman (Posted by xzins); Free Republic (Originally in The Kurdish Partnership now non-existent); 4/7/04 9:54:38 PM

·       Kurds; World Culture Encyclopedia; No publication date but for reference purposes the 1st dated comment is 5/22/06 6:06 am – site copyright listed © 2019 Advameg, Inc.


·       Is It Even Possible To “Betray” The Kurds? By Andrew KORYBKO; OrientalReview.org [Blog Editor: I sense Russian influence on this website]; 1/2/18

·       Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present); Wikipedia; Last Updated 10/18/19 22:25 (UTC)

Am I defending Turkish instituted genocide? GOD NO! If Muslim-Turks thought they could get away with it, they’d exterminate Americans too. If you doubt that, take a look at Ottoman Turk empire building history.

Justin Smith gives me choices of titles for his submissions. The Kurdish issue is so complicated I couldn’t decide. So I chose a primary title and italicized the rest.


JRH 10/22/19
Your generosity is always appreciated: 
Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
***********************
America Withdraws From Syria:
Trump Lets the Fires of Chaos Consume Syria

Why Is America Still In Syria?  
U.S Abandons Syria to Russia and Iran

By Justin O. Smith
Sent 10/20/2019 4:38 PM

President Trump's announcement that the U.S. would be withdrawing from northeast Syria, after a phone call with Turkish President Erdogan and a tweet, created a flurry of condemnation from former military leaders, politicians and the media, who called it a betrayal of the Kurds, "precipitous" and a move that would allow ISIS to renew itself. They act as though our alliance with the Kurds was based on a treaty when it wasn't, and they ignore the fact that this was a loose alliance of United States and Kurdish interests coinciding on the ISIS terrorism issue; the fact remains that both the United States and the Kurds understood that America wasn't staying in Syria forever and this withdrawal day was coming one day.  

No doubt, President Trump could have handled this situation a bit more adroitly, by intensely planning our disengagement through the Pentagon and the State Department, rather than announcing it on October 7th and starting the withdrawal the next day, something that was strongly opposed by the Pentagon. There should have been a plan in place to be implemented that would have afforded the Kurds a safe position, minimizing the "betrayal", since they have shed blood and lost 11,000 fighters in the fight against ISIS, at the behest of the U.S.; and, Turkey's concerns should have been met too, since the PKK [Kurdistan Workers’ Party] communists, a designated terrorist organization, were the operational head of the Kurdish forces in the north even though sixty-five percent of the population in that area are Christian Arabs and Yazidis.  

Obviously, the Kurds have been useful partners in the fight against ISIS, but they have also destabilized surrounding governments, to the best of their ability, and Leftist Democrats and "Conservative" Republicans suggesting Trump is betraying consistent allies is essentially a load of bull. The Kurds regularly taunted and attacked Turkey, making the situation in Syria more tumultuous and they constantly used their ISIS prisoners as leverage against the U.S. by constantly threatening to release ISIS prisoners and their families.  

Until a few weeks ago, a joint U.S-Turkish effort effected border patrol, demilitarized the Syrian Democratic Forces along the border and the U.S. was attempting to provide Turkey the security guarantees it required. And as of yet, I have not heard why that was not enough for President Erdogan, other than his demand of 6,000 square mile "buffer zone", within Syria, that Erdogan would control. This shouldn't be a requirement for repairing Washington's and Ankara's relations, but Turkey's miscalculations in diplomacy with Russia and Iran pushed the issue, since three million Syrian refugees in Turkey have become a political problem; some 115 million more now appear ready to breach the Turkish border under the current Russian-Syrian-Iranian drive to fill the power vacuum that is underway, and this is more than likely why security mechanisms created four months ago were not enough to satisfy Erdogan.

If the U.S. had attempted to construct a KRG model in Syria, we might not be here, but we never attempted to build such a construct. It also greatly angered Erdogan that we inverted our relationship through disjointed policy makers on the ground, who forgot the mission was to simply eradicate ISIS, while they started acting as agents for their PKK proxy -- only a splinter group of all Kurdistan -- and representing the Kurds' cause to our Turkish ally as if the PKK was representative of all Kurds and worthy of equal footing with the nation state of Turkey.

Essentially, we elevated a small splinter terrorist organization of a minority to equal stature of one of the strongest nations in the entire Middle East and a NATO ally, albeit a flawed allied of late. This was one-hundred percent untenable to the Turks.

The world is witnessing invading Turkish forces moving to secure and control the area, while Russia and Syria move into areas abandoned by the U.S., now aligned with the Kurds who signed an agreement with Syria on October 13th, and whoever is trapped within the current blockade of the area is in a terrible situation; Turkey's President Erdogan, an Islamist and aspiring caliph, will not discriminate between PKK and the rest of the population, that was supposed to have been given five days to evacuate the area, so Turkey can control a twenty mile deep and three hundred mile long "buffer zone" within Syria, even though some of the five million Kurds in the area have lived there for a century or more.  

Fighting was ongoing between various militia's and the Turks on October 17th despite the "cease fire", and air and artillery strikes continued to hit the Kurdish fighters, civilian settlements and a hospital in the border town of Ras al-Ayn, in northeastern Syria.

In recent days, Sinam Mohamad, U.S. Representative for the Syrian Democratic Council, offered an impassioned statement and observation: "The Syrian situation is not only with the PKK.  What's going on in Syria is not related to PKK. It's the Syrian people, Arabs, Kurds. In this region, we have five million people living there. They are not all PKK -- they are not (all) Kurds. They are Arabs. Do you think these Arabs are accepting to be a puppet in the Kurds hands? ... So who is the alternative here? (The Turkish soldiers) who came to the region killing (civilians) after arresting them as it happened to (the secretary general of Future Syria Party) Hevrin Khalaf? So this is the alternative?"

On October 12th 2019, Hevrin Khalaf, the secretary general of Future Syria Party, was murdered by the Turkish backed Ahar al-Sharqiya fighters near the M4 Motorway in northern Syria, during the Turkish military operation against Syrian Democratic Forces and its YPG militia in Rojava, largely led by Kurds.  

To be fair, President Trump had been telling his advisors for months to get this withdrawal planned out and prepared for implementation, since he was adamant about keeping his promise to "end forever wars", and even Erdogan, as evil a man as he is, showed restraint over the past months, as he continuously warned he wouldn't tolerate a PKK base of operations in northern Syria, that had the capability of being used against Turkey, at a later date, in a continuation of the Kurds century old fight to create a united Kurdistan, of 30 million Kurds, taking regions of Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria.  

However, modern day Turkey under Erdogan is no longer the secular Turkey that it was, when it joined NATO. Erdogan has facilitated the return of Islamic fundamentalism, even to the point of allowing ISIS to operate from Turkey, when the U.S. fought ISIS in Iraq, and buying black-market oil from ISIS, essentially funding their continued war in the region. He murders his opposition, he has gone around embargoes and sanctions facilitating Iran's nuclear program, he has purchased the S-400 from Russia, and his security people actually beat opposition protesters during one visit to D.C.  

This is not a good ally. This is not a regime the United States should be aiding, and America damned sure shouldn't be facilitating the extraterritorial aggression of Turkey either in Iraq or Syria.  

Americans must always ask the important questions. Why are we in Syria and what's the benefit and the U.S. interests in Syria? Please recall, the only mandate there was to address ISIS, not to aid the Kurds in their fight against Turkey or create a Kurdish state. 

Many in U.S. leadership positions, such as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, are uncomfortable leaving the fate of the area and the continued fight against ISIS in the hands of Russia, Syria and Turkey, since the Kurds have had to shift to focus from the prisons housing thousands of ISIS fighters -- with approximately 1000 already having escaped -- to defending the entire area against Turkish soldiers who will not hesitate to kill them on the spot, as Erdogan has already made clear, by way of his statement that he would "crush their [PKK] heads". Through a phone call and a tweet, President Trump essentially set this all in motion and gave Erdogan the green light to invade, so Trump is apparently comfortable leaving the region to America's enemies, Russia and Syria.  

On October 13th 2019, President Trump spoke in a laissez-faire manner, stating: "The Kurds and Turkey have been fighting for many years. Others may want to come in and fight for one side or the other. Let them!"

The only winners here for the moment are ISIS and Russia with a side benefit for Iran. 

President Trump should have at least forced Erdogan to give the U.S. something in return. The U.S. received no concessions. This is what America gets when Her president operates by the seat of his pants on a wing and a prayer. 

On a humanitarian level, the world is looking at approximately a third of Syria cast into chaos once more, while nearly half of Syria's entire population is already internally or externally displaced, with millions having migrated to Lebanon, Turkey, Jordan and elsewhere. And yes, some affiliate themselves with pro-Syrian defense forces, even though their ranks cut across all ethnic lines and walks of life, filled with Christians, Kurds, Arabs and Turkmen and tribes that have followed their tribal leaders into so very much a tribal geopolitical fight. These people are being slaughtered, while living under already absolutely horrific circumstances; missing is the up-close and intimate coverage of the substantial numbers of women and children who are literally dying of malnutrition, and with the approach of winter, many thousands will freeze to death; and, in more acts against humanity, the YPG, Turkish proxies, remnants of ISIS, Al Nusra and others still use these civilians, women and children in particular, as shields and political victims for their fight: And this must be stopped regardless of what the United States does.

With that said, there was a lack of any long term strategic purpose and logical policy for keeping U.S. forces in Northern Syria. Surely no one could seriously expect us to keep a thousand soldiers, or more with mission creep, in country for the next fifty or seventy-five years -- Could they?  

Despite President Trump's assertion that this was a move to keep his promise to "end forever wars", a U.S. presence is currently still deployed in eastern Syria along the border with Jordan. Those 700 soldiers being removed from the north are simply being redeployed in western Iraq and joining 2000 more in Saudi Arabia where they will act as a contingent deterrence to Iran's continued expansion, across the Middle East. So, as everyone can see, this isn't really a "withdrawal", as 300 Special Forces troops will remain in the southern Syrian outpost of Al-Tanf, to fight an ISIS resurgence, and America still isn't ending Her forever wars.   

Had this been a true professionally conducted withdrawal, rather than this fiasco, and President Trump not spoken out of both sides of his mouth and spoken frankly to the American people, many might not now be faulting him, even though pulling back for Erdogan's march into Syria was an unnecessary move that removed one more tool to fight Iran's aggressive expansion, that now has forced every group and nation that has an implied or an actual treaty guarantee that the U.S. will fight on its behalf to take a second look at its arrangements. The American public no longer has the will to fight the Long War in Syria or anywhere else, at a time when Congress is moving to continue operations in Syria as a firewall against Islamic terrorism, and in the meantime, President Trump will rightly take criticism over his handling of Syria and the shuffling of troops. And at a time he should have been reconciling U.S. national security interests to proper strategies through the constitutionally mandated process, Trump has instead decided to let this fire consume what it will and burn itself out.

By Justin O. Smith
++++++++++++++++++++
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
_____________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor. In full disclosure I could not source some of the content in Justin Smith’s submission. Which frankly is part of the reason for an untimely submission to post discrepancy. Also the issue of the Kurds is very complicated leading for both sympathy and disdain for them from this Blog Editor. On a personal level I hate such inner conflict.

© Justin O. Smith


Sunday, April 10, 2016

Another Christian Genocide



Justin Smith writes of the impotent actions of the Obama Administration to engage ISIS concerning the Islamic genocide against Christians.

JRH 4/10/16
*********************
Another Christian Genocide
Defend the Faith

By Justin O. Smith
Sent: 4/9/2016 1:35 PM

"Silence in the face of evil is evil itself. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." __ Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Christians are the primary focus of the Islamic State murderers in Iraq and Syria, who are also committing heinous acts against the Yazidis and other Muslims. Entire Christian communities are being eradicated through the most abhorrent and abominably evil acts imaginable. The Christian population of Aleppo, Syria, once numbering half a million, is now reduced to approximately 35,000. Virtually every last Christian has fled Mosul, Iraq, after being given "the choice" to convert to Islam or die. Christians qualify in many more significant ways to receive refugee status than any other people, and America and other predominantly Christian nations must provide them with immediate protection and sanctuary, or watch Christianity in the Middle East disappear.

While Muslims can move easily from one nearby Muslim nation to the next, Christians have nowhere to go, no safe haven, and any attempt to flee often ends in death. They cannot seek shelter in U.N. camps, hiding in private homes and secluded "safe-houses," instead they are attacked by Muslim "refugees" and killed by islamofascist jihadists, who raid the camps. And due to their inability to leave the country for fear of discovery on the trails of death, Christians have been denied "refugee" status through a technicality; this technicality has allowed the Obama administration to do absolutely nothing for five years, in the face of the worst Christian genocide since the Armenian genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire.

Some of America's finest citizens, such as Patrick Kelly (Knights of Columbus) and Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) finally pressured Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama to give an official U.S. declaration on March 17th that the Islamic State is committing genocide against Christians, Yazidis and Muslims. Rep. Rohrabacher's 'Save the Christians from Genocide Act' (HR4017) passed the House and Senate last month, after receiving motivation from the December 4th, 2015 letter to Secretary Kerry, from thirty religious leaders, scholars and experts working with the Heritage Foundation, that documented "ISIS assassinations of Church leaders; mass murders; torture ... and systematic rape of Christian girls and women."

Dr. Jerry Johnson, an ethicist and president of National Religious Broadcasters, suggested [CS Monitor version]: "If some anti-Muslim group was gathering up the Muslims, putting them in cages ... dousing them in gas and lighting them on fire, or lining them up and beheading Muslims simply because they were Muslims, quite frankly ... our government would have declared this an outrage and a genocide a long time ago."

Despite Secretary Kerry's statement, "What Daesh (Islamic State) wants to erase, we must preserve", no one should view this too optimistically. The Obama administration was fully aware of the Christian genocide five years ago, and yet, Obama's Cabinet stubbornly refused to create a viable strategy to destroy these islamofascist murderers. Obama's defacto policy favored Muslim "refugees" and blocked Christians, and it will not change much now.

America has witnessed Obama's unconditional love of all things Islamic, like the Muslim call to prayer, and we have heard him apologize to the Middle East for "Western imperialism". He has repeatedly claimed that the chaos, violence and murders committed by Islamic State terrorists are not "Islamic" and the Islamic State jihadists are not "Islamic", when the historical evidence has documented torture and beheadings as the Muslim's preferred method of proselytism from the 7th century right into the present. No one should be astonished that for Obama, genocide is not genocide if it's committed against Christians.

If only reluctantly, the Obama administration declared this Christian genocide, and the U.S. is now obligated legally, under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948 [TreatiesUN.org], to "take all measures to prevent genocide which [are] within [its] power and which might [contribute] to preventing genocide." But, this obligation does not require direct military intervention, so the world should expect only the bare minimum effort from this administration and possibly the next: However, HR4017 does require Homeland Security to assign a heightened refugee status to these victims of genocide and to expedite visas for them.

Samantha Power observed in her 2002 book 'A Problem From Hell', that "No U.S. president has ever made genocide prevention a priority, and no U.S. president has ever suffered politically for his indifference to its occurrences."

Americans may not have "religious tests" for our compassion and immigration/refugee policies, however, an accurate security test must now necessarily convince Congress to block Obama's plan to give 10,000 Syrian "refugees" entry into America by September 30th, unless they are verified to be Syrian Christians. While Christians pose absolutely no threat to America, the Syrian Muslim refugees contain a fifth column [Two more perspectives on 5th Column Muslims HERE and HERE] that hates us and wants to kill us and destroy our way of life; so essentially, they are imposing a religious test, with the endgame being a Christian holocaust.

In January 2016, Nadia Taha [The Freedom Fund], a 21 year old Iraqi woman, testified about her brutal rape and enslavement by Islamic State terrorists, before the United Nations Security Council in her effort to convince the international community to intervene. She recalled, "That night, he beat me up, forced me to undress, and put me in the room with six militants ... They continued to commit crimes to my body until I became unconscious."

Last April in St. Peter's Square, Pope Francis stated that "Our brothers and our sisters ... are persecuted, exiled, slain, beheaded, solely for being Christian ... I truly hope that the international community doesn't look the other way." Now, one year later this evil persists.

"If the world hates you, you know that it hate Me before it hate you. _ John 15:18 ... If they persecute Me, they will persecute you. _ John 15:20

With so many hundreds of thousands of Christians forced from their ancestral lands and murdered by Muslims, is it too late to save Christianity in the Middle East? Only time will tell, but time is running out.

Americans and people of the Free World, who care, simply have to do everything within their combined ability to save the Christians of Iraq and Syria and stop the spread of this intense and insane regional war to other regions. Whatever one's situation, send any aid at hand to relief organizations, similar to the Barnabas Fund [About and Donate], who are sheltering, feeding and even evacuating Christians to the West. Move our leaders to send more and better resources to national guard equivalents like the Peshmerga [Breitbart 3/16/16], who are fighting the Islamic State. Move world leaders to eradicate the Islamic State. And should these efforts fall far short, young Christian men and women might also consider going to these areas to help and/or fight, not as mercenaries but as Defenders of the Faith: Christmas Day 2014 was the first time in 2,000 that the bells did not ring out in the city of Mosul.

By Justin O Smith
________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
All links are by the Editor and all text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.


© Justin O. Smith

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Intro: 2 Stories on ISIS Rapaciousness and the Quran

Edited by John R. Houk
Posted 10/13/15

Thanks to Ari Bussel my readers have become aware of the abhorrent violence committed by Muslim Arabs that call themselves Palestinians against Israeli Jews. America/Obama’s support for these heinous individuals to form a Jew-hating sovereign state is reprehensible. Now Obama is abandoning Christians and other non-Muslims (according to the eyes of Sunnis) to the butchery of ISIS! How crazy is this horror? And Obama is proud to have pulled U.S. troops out of Iraq and abandon non-Muslims to the brutality of ISIS!

Daily Mail story behind Muslim War Booty photo. 5/22/15




Posted by Eretz Zen 
Published on Nov 1, 2014 
 A recent video has emerged from the northern Iraqi city of Mosul that shows militants belonging to the Islamic State (IS, aka ISIL or ISIS) excited as they discuss that they are on the day when they will sell and buy Yazidi female captives that are treated as sex slaves. Most of those filmed are believed to be Saudi from their accent. 

Warning: This video might not be suitable for all ages. It is not for shock but for documenting crimes and human rights violations of ISIL militants in Syria and Iraq.

The original photos used from the below two stories are not of the actual child raped nor are the Yazidi women portrayed the mother forced to watch. I’m omitting the photo of the little girl because of the original location Mad World News borrowed it from. I will use the photo of the two women for they are portraying the horrendous grief of loss to death and it was from the pukcc English website. I haven’t been able to locate an adequate free online translator to detect the original language (I’ve checked Arabic, Farsi-Persian, Turkish and Kurdish). The irony to that is the web server seems to be in Provo, UT. And that means I don’t have a good grasp of that website’s agenda or outlook.

JRH 10/13/15
************************
Muslims Grab 9-Year-Old Child… Then Make Mother Watch The Terror That Happens Next

October 12th, 2015

We all know, at least in abstract terms, the sort of horror caused by the Islamic State group. However, it’s almost impossible to realize just how evil these extremists are without experiencing their monstrous behavior first-hand — or listening to someone who has.

Delan Dakheel Saeed, a Yazidi doctor in northern Iraq, spoke of such horrors at a conference in London. According to Reuters, Saeed — whose brother is the only Yazidi member in Iraq’s parliament — talked last week of the sexual violence wrought by the Islamic State savages against her people.

While the tales of sexual slavery and forced marriages of young girls is enough to turn your stomach even without elaboration, the 25-year-old Erbil-based doctor told the audience a chilling story of just how far Islamic State will go.

“I myself witnessed a 9-year-old girl who was raped and bled to death in front of her mother’s eyes,” Saeed said.

“There is not even a medical cure or physical cure, not even a mental cure.”

The Yazidis, whose beliefs are a mixture of Christianity, Islam and Zoroastrianism, have long been a target of the Islamic State group because of what they see as the Yazidis’ heretical views.

“After 14 months, the situation is the same, nothing has changed,” said Vian Dakheel Saeed, Delan Dakheel Saeed’s brother. “Nobody supports us.”

One might think that child-rape in the name of religion is a sick perversion of any faith.

However, here’s what Quran 5:33 says about unbelievers: “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement.”

Oh, and let’s talk about the prophet’s child bride, Aisha. As the Hadith (a collection of things said by Muhammad) says, “… she (Aisha) was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.” (Muslim 8.3311)

So, the prophet advocated the murder of unbelievers and countenanced the rape of children. When you read those, how on earth could this atrocity surprise you?


Do you think that the Islamic State group is following the letter of the Quran? Let us know how you feel on our Facebook page or Twitter. [Blog Editor: In fairness to the Conservative Tribune go to their post to Facebook or Twitter this particular news story]
+++
Muslims Make Mother Watch As They Do The Unthinkable To Her 9-Year-Old

October 11, 2015

As hordes of cowardly men flee the war-torn Middle East, the mothers, wives, and daughters they’ve left behind are forced to take desperate measures for survival. However, as ISIS sweeps through Iraq and Syria, horror stories from escapees detail exactly what happens to those who have been abandoned in the face of Islamic terror.

A mother, who was unable to escape the rampage of jihadists, was captured along with her 9-year-old daughter. In an attempt to mentally torture the woman, the Muslim militants took her little girl and gang-raped her repeatedly before her mother’s eyes — but their reign of terror didn’t end there.

Reuters reports that Iraqi Parliament member Vian Dakhil and her sister, Delan Dakhil, delivered shock reports to U.S. lawmakers about ISIS cruelty towards minorities.

“I myself witnessed a 9-year-old girl who was raped and bled to death in front of her mother’s eyes,” said Delan Dakheel Saeed, the sister of the lawmaker. 
 “There is not even a medical cure or physical cure, not even a mental cure,” she said.

How painful it must’ve been for a child’s tiny body to endure such horrific abuse, and equally painful for her grieving mother to watch her being raped to death.

Mad World News previously reported that the Dakhil sisters had confirmed another testimony of a young mother who had been captured by ISIS and forced to eat her own 3-year-old son. ISIS insurgents fed the starving woman rice and meat, telling her, “this is your boy — 3 years.”

We already know that ISIS is committing these atrocities, but the importance lies in the fundamentals of Islam. ISIS is not the disease, but the symptom. Islam is the disease. To understand why this terror group is doing these very specific things, we must look to the prophet of Islam.

In the entire Quran, Muhammad is the one human being that Allah commands his followers emulate. Although Muhammad admits he is sinful, Allah is clear in that his messenger is the perfect example for Muslims to follow. This means that all of his life choices are justified and should be copied.

One of the most controversial acts of Muhammad’s short existence is his marriage to Aisha. Aisha was only 6-years-old when the pedophile prophet claims Allah showed her to him in a dream. He convinced her father, most likely through intimidation, that the child should be wed to him.

Most Muslims will justify his marriage by reminding that the prophet waited until Aisha was 9 before he consummated the marriage, as if this makes the sickening perversity any better. However, a 53-year-old man forcing himself upon a prepubescent child is appalling enough. In fact, the sinister reality is revealed in the Hadith.

“…she (Aisha) was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.” [Muslim 8.3311]

Aisha, who helped narrate the Hadith and author the Quran after her husband’s death, revealed that the prophet had a lust for fondling her before he fully consummated the marriage, and after she was old enough to have a menstrual cycle.

Narrated ‘Aisha: “The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub (state of impurity after having sex). During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me.” [Bukhari 1.6.298]

Once we see how their prophet saw children, as sexual objects, we can fully understand ISIS’s logic. The only difference is that ISIS fighters are not marrying some of these children. However, Muhammad modeled many times that it was righteous to take females as “war booty.”

“O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war…” [Quran 33:50]

Because the Quran states that Muslims are in constant war “until there is no more fitnah (disbelief)” in Allah, Muslims can take women and children as sex slaves or forced brides, and this is justified by their god and prophet.

If Muslims truly believe that the Quran is Allah’s word and Muhammad his messenger, there is no man-made interpretation that can deny this is right and good in their eyes. After all, Allah has defined “good” and “right” for them, and it undeniably includes forced marriage, slavery, pedophilia, and rape.

Photo Credit [PUKCC, RIPeace]
________________________
Muslims Grab 9-Year-Old Child… Then Make Mother Watch The Terror That Happens Next

Copyright 2015. Conservative Tribune.
_______________________
Muslims Make Mother Watch As They Do The Unthinkable To Her 9-Year-Old

Copyright © 2015


Mad World News is firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the liberal media.


Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Religious Freedom Report

Persecution - Global Assault on Christians
You need to become aware just horrific the persecution is against Christians globally. Check out these links from the monthly Religious Freedom Report sponsored by the Acton Institute – Institute on Religion and Democracy.

JRH 8/26/14
***************************
Religious Freedom Report
Sent: 8/25/2014 1:19 PM
August 2014 Issue
Institute on Religion and Democracy

The Religious Freedom Report is a monthly update about the persecution of the Church worldwide. It is a joint project of The Institute on Religion & Democracy in Washington D.C., and the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion & Liberty in Grand Rapids, Mich. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, simply click the unsubscribe button on the bottom of the page. Thanks for reading.


It happened this past June in Wuxi Village. According to the Associated Press, the government hired a crew to cut down the metal cross atop the Wuxi Christian Church in Zhejiang Province (just south of Shanghai on China’s east coast). The day after they sawed it down, a church member welded the cross back in place and was brought in for hours of questioning. A week later, down came the cross a second time only to be put back by another church member.


Why is the world silent while Christians are being slaughtered in the Middle East and Africa?


A group of 11 sick, disabled and elderly Iraqi Christians --including an 80-year-old woman with breast cancer -- defied terrorists who ordered them to convert to Islam or be beheaded, saying they preferred death to giving up their faith.


The recently-elected Archbishop of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) the Most Rev. Foley Beach has issued a call to prayer and action on behalf of persecuted Christians in the Middle East.

If You Don't Stop Evil, Evil Spreads [Originally bad link – Found link at DetroitNews.com]

It reads like something from a history book or a class lecture about something decades and even centuries ago in a time period where we were less equipped to handle it. But it is happening right now, to our own people, in a time period where we have sophisticated military, high-tech equipment and the ability to get status updates in real time.


The new Egyptian government had pledged to rebuild the churches, but they may face too much public opposition actually to be able to do that. After all, the Muslim Brotherhood supporters in Egypt haven’t all vanished into thin air, and rebuilding the churches is just the kind of thing that could provoke them.


Indignation and outrage in the Christian community of Lahore (Pakistan) after the rape of a 12-year-old Christian girl.


Amnesty International said the victims, some just babies, were snatched from villages and face the prospect of being forced into marriage or sold as sex slaves.


Iraqi civilians are being subjected to “barbaric” sexual violence committed by Sunni Islamic State (IS) jihadist fighters, the U.N reports.


ISIS’ Islamic justice condemns women for the immorality of having their faces uncovered. Meanwhile they’re raping young boys.


"They took the women and the young girls. The men were killed with butcher's knives,” one young woman told FRANCE 24.


Saeed Abedini, a pastor who holds American citizenship and has been captive in Iran for nearly two years, faces new dangers and death threats from fellow prisoners, say his family’s representatives.


Boko Haram—a Hausa phrase meaning “Western education is a sin”—is an Islamic terrorist group whose stated aim is the establishment, by force, of a strict, sharia-law theocracy in Nigeria.
__________________________

Mission

We are Christians working to reaffirm the church’s biblical and historical teachings, strengthen and reform its role in public life, protect religious freedom, and renew democracy at home and abroad.

Vision

To lead the fight rallying Christians to champion biblical, historic Christianity and its role in democratic society, and to defeat revisionist challenges.


Christianity and Democracy
by Reverend Richard John Neuhaus

A Statement of the Institute on Religion and Democracy

Jesus Christ is Lord. That is the first and final assertion Christians make about all of reality, including politics. Believers now assert by faith what one day will be manifest to the sight of all: every earthly sovereignty is subordinate to the sovereignty of Jesus Christ.
The Church is the community of believers who bear witness to that claim. Because the Church is pledged to the Kingdom proclaimed by Jesus, it must maintain a critical distance from all the kingdoms of the world, whether actual or proposed. Christians betray their Lord if, in theory or practice, they equate the Kingdom of God with any political, social, or economic order of this passing time. At best, such orders permit the proclamation of the Gospel of the Kingdom and approximate, in small part, the freedom, peace and justice for which we hope. At worst, such orders attempt to suppress the good news of the Kingdom and oppress human beings who are the object of divine love and promise.

The First Political Task of the Church

The first political task of the Church is to be the Church. That is, Christians must proclaim and demonstrate the Gospel to all people, embracing them in a sustaining community of faith and discipline under the Lordship of Christ. In obedience to this biblical mandate, Christians have a special care for all who are in need, especially the poor, the oppressed, the despised and the marginal. The Church is called to be a community of diversity, including people of every race, nation, class, and political viewpoint. As a universal community, the Church witnesses to the limits of the national and ideological loyalties that divide mankind. Communal allegiance to Christ and his Kingdom is the indispensable check upon pretensions of the modern state. Because Christ is Lord, Caesar is not Lord. By humbling all secular claims to sovereignty, the Church makes its most important political contribution by being, fully and unapologetically, the Church.

While our first allegiance is to the community of faith and its mission in the world, Christians do not withdraws from participation in other communities. To the contrary, we are called to be leaven and light in movements of cultural, and economic change. History is the arena in which Christians exercise their discipleship. Because our hope is eternal and transcendent, Christians can participate in society without despair or delusion. We do not despair of the meaning of history, nor do we delude ourselves that our efforts are to be equated with establishing the Kingdom of God. The fulfillment of history’s travail is the promised Rule of God, not the establishment of our human programs and designs.

Towards an Open Church

God has given us no one pattern for the ordering of societies or of the world. For almost two millennia Christians have pursued their mission within a variety of social, political, and economic systems. Among Christians today, as in times past, there are significant disagreements about the most appropriate and effective ways to advance freedom, justice, and peace in the world. That Christians are to pursue these goals should be beyond dispute. Disagreements about how they are to be pursued need be neither surprising nor destructive. In making political decisions, we are all subject to error. Through prayer, we decide in the courage of our uncertainties. We strive to credit the intelligence and good intentions of those who decide differently. Especially within the believing community we must, in the words of Reinhold Niebuhr, avoid portraying our conflicts as a war between “the children of light and the children of darkness.” Our unity in Christ is greater than whatever may divide us.

Within our several churches, disagreement about the meaning of social justice should not merely be tolerated; it should be cherished. We are pledged to the goal that our churches be open churches. An open church engages sympathetically the diversity of Christian views both within and outside denominational structures. An open church welcomes dissent on contingent judgments about the right-ordering of society; this strengthens the search for truth and helps correct error. An open church makes decisions in the light of day, not in the shadowed corners of bureaucratic power. An open church has leaders eager to engage in the fullest consultation with all its members. An open church addresses social issues not so much to advance a particular position as to inform and empower people to make their own decisions responsibly. An open church understands that the Church speaks most effectively when the people who are the Church do the speaking, and leaders speak more believably when they speak with the informed consent of those whom they would lead.

Sometimes leaders can and should disagree with the views of the majority. To disagree, however, is not to disregard the views of others. Leadership in an open church is marked by … READ THE REST