Globalism is an Evil Agenda:

DO NOT be Fooled: Russia and China are Both Influential in One Fashion or Another in that Globalist Agenda

Vladimir Putin - Xi Jinping

 

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 3, 2025

 

I just read a lengthy post by Matthew Ehret at Substack Badlands Media posted on May 1 entitled: “Defeating the Depopulation Agenda: The Sovereign Alliance vs. the Gaia Cult”.

 

Ehret’s examination of the history of Climate and Depopulation Elitist Tyrants makes the post worth the read. HOWEVER, I have a couple of dissenting views on two nations Ehret glorifies as anti-Globalist heroes. Those two nations: Russia and the Peoples Republic of China.

 

You may or may not agree with my dissent reasoning.

 

Russia is ruled by an autocrat who makes sure his reelection is secured while jailing any serious opponents. That would be Vladimir Putin who was a dedicated Soviet-Leninist Communist and a tyrannical ex-KGB Agent who operated in the once-upon-a-time Soviet Satellite Communist ruled East Germany.

 

If Putin has any present day redeeming qualities, it is my belief he has abandoned the once Soviet hardline of exporting an international Leninist-Stalinist Soviet world order. Putin appears to be more interested in establishing the Russian Republic as a regional power while keeping foreign adversaries OUT of the traditional Russian orbit of influence.

 

Putin’s regionalism has indeed led him into a confrontational mode with Western Globalists who seem to be more heirs to a pseudo-Neo-Corporatist-Marxist ONE-World Agenda of the old Soviet Union. It is my opinion Putin’s appearance of being an Anti-Globalist is the result of making the Russian Republic a regional Super Power more than against any Globalist Agenda.

 

Anti-Globalists seemingly ignore Putin’s roots and pro-Globalists glory in Putin’s negative traits. Some of the info-links below might emphasize one side over the other so do some independent critical thinking to frame an actual Putin persona. Hopefully you will agree that persona as far as American Liberty goes IS NOT a pleasant picture:

 

o   The Truth About Vladimir Putin's KGB Career; By Marina Manoukian; Grunge.com; Last Updated 5/20/22 2:07 pm EST

 

o   Putin the Marxist-Leninist; By Lee Edwards, Ph.D.; Heritage Foundation; 6/7/22

 

o   Deepening China-Russia Alliance May Lead To Another Cold War: Putin’s invasion of Ukraine backed openly by Chinas economic power is just the first geopolitical product of a restored Russia-China axis; By Jonathan D T Ward; NDTV World; 3/25/23 16:43 pm IST

 

o   Interpreting Xi Jinping's Shifting Strategy on the Russia-Ukraine War; By Guoguang Wu; Asia Society Policy Institute; 10/11/23

 

o   How Vladimir Putin has disposed of his enemies - including poisonings and plane crashes: The attacks range from poisoning by drinking polonium-laced tea or touching a deadly nerve agent, to getting shot at close range - while others have plunged to their deaths from an open window; By Joseph Gamp; Mirror UK; 1/28/24 09:14

 

o   Stand by me? Vladimir Putin's remaining allies: Russian leader Vladimir Putin's recent visit to Vietnam reinforced a pattern that has emerged since he invaded Ukraine: His allies these days are those who rule by force; By Henry-Laur Allik; Deutsche Welle (DW.com Mission Page); 6/20/24

 

o   Vladimir Putin; Rational Wiki; Last Update I looked at 4/3/25 23:08

 

AND MY GOSH – CHINA: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ruled China not is a part of the Globalist Agenda, the CCP desires to be the Big Dog amongst all the other Globalist Elitists promoting a ONE-World Order in which considered useless humans are expendable.

 

And yet Matthew Ehret extols Russia and China in his otherwise great post on the history of Depopulation-Climate Tyrant Elitists. I’m not alone in disagreeing with Ehret extolling CCP ruled China:

 

o   Communist China’s Plot for World Domination: Ian Easton sounds the alarm about an existential threat to our way of life; By Francis P. Sempa; The American Spectator; 9/12/22 11:04 PM

 

o   WEF Founder Klaus Schwab Says China Is 'Role Model for Many Countries': 'The Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries.'; By Jarryd Jaeger; Human Events; 11/23/22

 

o   WEF Boss Klaus Schwab Says China A ‘Role Model’ For Many Nations – OpEd; By K. Lloyd Billingsley; Eurasia Review; 12/2/22

 

o   The Importance of Being Communist—Evolution of China’s Ideological Orthodoxy and Its Vision for Global Dominance: As the world faces the paramount threat from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), it’s imperative to have a realistic perspective on the party’s aspirations for global influence with a focus on its ideological underpinnings; By Miles Maochun Yu; Hoover Institution; 4/9/24

 

o   'We're Going to Get Hit' - China Expert Issues Dire Warning; By Ward Clark; RedState.com; 12/19/24 1:04 PM

 

o   China’s ‘common destiny’ is America’s uncommon challenge:  Xi Jinping's blueprint for a world order dictated by Beijing; By Miles Yu; Washington Times; 1/6/25

 

o   Death Match: China's CCP vs. America's Democracy; By Gordon G. Chang; Gatestone Institute; 2/12/25 5:00 am

 

In full disclosure I used to be a Neoconservative largely under the philosophy that American historical principals of our Founding and Liberty should be exported to other nations. It was a good notion that was used to entangle America into Forever Wars. Decades long of war showed me foreign peoples cannot recognize an American Principle rammed down their throat. This is particularly the case in Islamic dominated cultures in which Islamic Supremacism has brainwashed the acceptance of anti-Liberty thinking for centuries. Only a brutality unacceptable to American Culture can alter Islamic Supremacist culture. Even the brutality of Communism failed transformational experiments in Muslim nations.

 

AND SO, I am now a card carrying return America back to an Isolationism in which the USA becomes self-sufficient economically and militarily powerful enough to keep foreign agendas threatening the U.S. Constitution and American Exceptionalism OUT. I could care less if the American Dollar is the foundation of international currency. I could care less what happens in the Ukraine. I do care when foreign adversaries attempt to destabilize America with shenanigans in America’s backyard. U.S. Borders, the Panama Canal (built by Americans at great monetary cost and the cost of human lives) and perhaps the defensive location Greenland presents for the USA.

 

A less lengthy read than Matthew Ehret’s post on Depopulation/Climate Elitists is Alex Newman’s Substack Liberty Sentinel post addressing the Trump Administration dumping involvement to the United Nations Agenda 2030. It’s entitled, “U.S. “Rejects and Denounces” UN 2030 Agenda: Historic: The US delegation to the United Nations has announced it "will no longer reaffirm" Agenda 2030 and the SDGs "as a matter of course." The significance of this cannot be overstated.”

 

It is an easier read and I’m cross posting it below.

 

JRH 5/3/25

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com

>>DRINK HAPPY-HEALTHY COFFEE<<

******************************

U.S. “Rejects and Denounces” UN 2030 Agenda

Historic: The US delegation to the United Nations has announced it "will no longer reaffirm" Agenda 2030 and the SDGs "as a matter of course." The significance of this cannot be overstated.

U.S. Announces Agenda 2030 Rejection (screengrab from video – LS Photo)

 

By Alex Newman

May 1, 2025

Liberty Sentinel

 

The U.S. delegation to the United Nations denounced the UN’s so-called “master plan for humanity,” better known as the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals, sending shockwaves through the UN General Assembly. Patriots celebrated the news.

 

Edward Heartney, counselor for Economic and Social Affairs (ECOSOC) at the U.S. Mission to the UN, was speaking in March during a discussion on a UN General Assembly resolution that reaffirmed governments’ commitment to the controversial UN goals.

 

“We have a concern that this resolution is a reaffirmation of Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),” Heartney said. “Although framed in neutral language, Agenda 2030 and the SDGs advance a program of soft global governance that is inconsistent with U.S. sovereignty and adverse to the rights and interests of Americans.”

 

“Put simply, globalist endeavors like Agenda 2030 and the SDGs lost at the ballot box,” he added. “Therefore, the United States rejects and denounces the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals, and it will no longer reaffirm them as a matter of course.”

 

Watch the epic clip:

 

[Blog Editor: I uploaded the Liberty Sentinel clip to my Bitchute Channel]

 

Bitchute VIDEO: U.S. Rejects and Denounces UN 2030 Agenda

[Posted by SlantRight2

Published May 3, 2025

 

… MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

One longtime UN analyst, Mark Leon Goldberg of Global Dispatches, described the statement as the “diplomatic equivalent of ripping the foundation from a decade of work at the UN — not just walking away from the table, but flipping it over on the way out.”

 

The UN SDGs are essentially a roadmap to global tyranny. From centralizing government at the international level and mass wealth redistribution to a global war on farmers and brazen indoctrination of children, the SDGs cover it all. The CCP boasted about its “crucial role” in developing the plan.

 

A comprehensive report on Agenda 2030 that Alex Newman wrote in 2015 after they were adopted by Obama and all UN members can be found here: https://thenewamerican.com/print/un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism/ [Blog Editor: This link will take to The New American posted on 1/4/16. You can only read the whole post with a paid subscription. Otherwise you will have to settle for reading a few summarized paragraphs.]

 

© 2025 Alex Newman

Liberty Sentinel HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Liberty Sentinel

 

The United States and China Collide

Justin Smith addresses the ever looming confrontation between the United States and Communist China.

JRH 5/15/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

******************

The United States and China Collide

America Must Ensure Her Global Dominance

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 5/14/2019 6:54 PM

"Tariffs will make our Country MUCH STRONGER, not weaker. Just sit back and watch! In the meantime, China should not renegotiate deals with the U.S. at the last minute. This is not the Obama Administration, or the Administration of Sleepy Joe, who let China get away with “murder!” ~ President Trump on May 10th 2019

The first opening salvos in the most bitter trade war between the United States and China, unlike any witnessed since the 1930s, are simply part of a broader agenda, as both nations jockey for positions of dominance on the global stage. For those who are crying that tariffs are a tax on the consumer, they are much more than a simple tax, and they are a means to ensuring our economy leads on all fronts in the global markets and the U.S. dollar remains the global reserve currency. And as such, this isn't so much a trade war as it is an effort by President Trump to ensure America's global dominance and national security far into the future, by increasing and safeguarding our technical advantage and ability to win any war forced upon us, including the next world war. 

The U.S. and China relations are testing a new low and the United States and China are on a collision course. Goodwill between the two that was purchased by U.S. dollars is rapidly breaking down. 

As promised, President Trump raised duties on $200 billion of Chinese imports to twenty-five percent from ten percent on May 10th, and in response, China's commerce Ministry has vowed "necessary countermeasures" are forthcoming. After eleven rounds of negotiations and no deal, President Trump is also now considering applying tariffs to the $300 billion in Chinese goods that are currently tariff free. 

Even the Obama administration complained during Obama's second term about China's unfair trade practices, such as duties on U.S. chicken, Chinese protectionist acts in the aircraft industry, Chinese subsidy of its corn, rice and wheat production and export duties on various metal. 

At the heart of the matter, China has stated its plan to be the world's leading superpower, and they are positioning themselves to rocket past the U.S. in economic and military strength on the back of technology China steals from the United States and every other nation that does business with China. China's President Xi Jinping believes he can turn China into a super competitive nation and a technical juggernaut and superpower by 2025, in the areas of information technology, aerospace, advanced robotics and artificial intelligence. 

Although China is more than willing to increase its purchases of U.S. goods, especially soybean and natural gas purchases to offset last year's record $419 billion trade deficit, China will not accept any limitation on its grander vision and its desire to control the technological mountain top. They may stop talking about it, but they'll never end China's Made In China 2025 program; they may become even more secretive, but they will never cease their industrial espionage, and they will continue to coerce technology transfers, if only in a less blatant manner.

Since 2010, China has promised eight times to stop forcing foreign companies to transfer technology to China, as a cost of doing business in China. And yet according to a 2018 Office of U.S. Trade report, the coercion has continued. 

Noted by two retired senior Department of Defense officials in 2017, a problem that costs America $600 billion annually, technology and intellectual property theft must be America's primary focus over the trade deficit. Although few companies publicly acknowledge the problem, forty-four percent of those aerospace companies and forty-one percent of the chemical concerns operating in China felt pressured to "share" technology with China, according to AmCham Shanghai Business (July 2018), and Rand Corp warns its employees against taking their personal electronics with them to China, since several U.S. businessmen have caught people (spies) searching their rooms. Chinese spies have already stolen documents concerning the U.S. F-35 fighter and the space shuttle, along with secrets on our most significant weapons systems. 

All of this only confirms that the widening rift between D.C. and Beijing goes beyond trade, and it is further exhibited by China's massive military buildup, which was only made possible through the near $500 billion trade deficit -- or more once one includes intellectual property theft -- and U.S. wealth. Among other problems, China is claiming ownership and control of international waterways in the South China Sea and disregarding other nation's territorial claims, as well as the 2016 International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea ruling (although I'm not a big fan of sovereign nations bowing to international entities), it has significantly suppressed liberty in the ostensibly autonomous region of Hong Kong, and it is increasing pressure on Taiwan -- a de facto independent and sovereign nation -- to reunite with "the Motherland". 

"It was way past time to confront China on many of these problems", Michael Wessel, a member of the congressionally chartered U.S-China Economic Security Review, recently stated. "They've been allowed to skate for too many years." 

In the meantime, complaints that the cost of these tariffs will be borne by Americans is exaggerated, since it appears that China absorbed the last round of tariffs out of their profits rather than raising the cost of goods at Walmart. It also appears that China underestimated President Trump's resolve on this issue and their own miscalculation is biting them in the rump right now. President Trump couldn't have picked a better time for this confrontation, with the American economy riding high. 

China also didn't count on the rising antipathy of Americans towards it, as Americans see China unfairly undercut our economic prosperity, threaten our security and challenge our values. Republicans and Democrats alike are rallying around the flag on this issue, in a rare bipartisan consensus that America must stand up to China. 

If nothing else, any shift away from China will only be a benefit to America, when U.S. businesses and manufacturers return to America out of cost concerns. Although tariffs do hit consumers, they don't if one chooses not to buy those particular goods, opting instead to buy comparable goods made in other nations or America. So, President Trump should place tariffs on all Chinese goods and cripple China's economy, however long or temporary.   

Just as the Plaza Accord of 1985 forced Japan to act more fairly on trade, by devaluing the dollar against the yen, and eliminated trade barriers, it also demonstrates that White House initiated trade wars do not automatically end in disaster. Aggressive trade measures can and often do work and succeed in placing the global economic system on a more feasible trajectory of an open and rules based economic order. 

Pat Buchanan recently noted: "Of the nations that have risen to economic preeminence in recent years -- the British before 1850, the United States between 1789 and 1914, post-war Japan, China in recent decades -- how many did so through free trade? None. All practiced economic nationalism." 

President Trump recognizes the party is coming to an end and that America must extricate Herself from the unholy alliance with "the Dragon" and enabling its path to global dominance. He understands that economics do not receive an exemption from the dynamics of geopolitical competition and growing national security concerns associated with China; and, by walking a fine line and between targeted measures and negotiations, President Trump should be able to hand China a face-saving defeat that protects and saves America's own economic independence, sovereignty, greatness and national identity, without devolution into all-out war. Simply stated, this is one war America must win. 

By Justin O. Smith

______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links are by the Editor.

© Justin O. Smith