DONATE

Showing posts with label War on Christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War on Christianity. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Intro to ‘Christianity Is The Real Target…’

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

April 29, 2025

 

WELL… Grrr… A morning thunderstorm  knocked my high speed Internet service this morning. And the service is being sketchy about when the Internet will be restored.

 

AND SO, I’m stock using my snail-slow Android Phone hotspot which annoyingly sometimes boots me off.

 

Therefore, I will share an article from The Federalist that I managed to bring up in slow motion. The title: “Christianity Is The Real Target Of All The Hysteria Over ‘Christian Nationalism’”.

 

Essentially the theme is that the Left (as in Dem-Marxists and fellow traveler atheists) screams ‘Christian Nationalist White Supremacist Neo-Nazi’ whenever Christians point to a lack of Biblical morality in culture and government. The screaming of course is to silence Christian dissent to the agenda of a cultural fundamental transformation of the American founding principles and way of life.

 

See what you think…

 

JRH 4/29/25 [Typically I make Substack primary designation but it is having Network Issues at posting time.]

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL - one-time or recurring). A CHALLENGE to Readers for 10 people together to help with $400 end of month budget:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store:

https://dianawellnessstore.com

>>DRINK HAPPY-HEALTHY COFFEE<<

*************************

Christianity Is The Real Target Of All The Hysteria Over ‘Christian Nationalism’

Church with Steeple (TF Photo)

 

By Harold Ristau

April 29, 2025

The Federalist

 

Are there any real and credible statistics supporting a menacing movement by Christians seeking to theocratize America with neo-Naziism?

 

The public square has never been theologically or morally neutral. Therefore, the church must and will continue to heed its divine obligation to publicly speak the holy Word of God.

 

Only a godless culture would dare to claim that the public sphere is somehow neutral. Yet those who boldly lift their voices on behalf of the church and her Lord in the public sphere, are facing intensifying persecution for doing so.

 

Over the last few years, a frenetic buzz around “Christian nationalism” has spread across America. Is Christian nationalism, according to its most offensive definition, even a real threat in America? Are there any real and credible statistics supporting a menacing movement by extremist Christians seeking to theocratize America with white-supremacist neo-Naziism?

 

Prior to lockdowns, most of us had never heard of “Christian nationalism.” Rather, it appears that the powerful gaslighting term created by neo-Marxists is another attempt to terrify Christians out of sharing God’s perspective on moral issues in the public sphere. It attempts to dissuade Christians from fulfilling their vocational duties in the civil sphere.

 

By distorting the language of public discourse, the godless manipulate the parameters of discussion within it. Christians who are unaware of these political tactics cannot effectively contend for the faith.

 

We witness this in the abortion debate by allowing the dialogue to be framed by rights versus responsibility language. Notwithstanding the existence of any civil or even human rights, mankind has a moral responsibility to care for the innocent. Also, by adopting the language of LGBTQ+, Christians add legitimacy to the absurd concept of more than two sexes, or multiple identities present in one human being.

 

Quietistic Christians have allowed themselves to be manipulated by leftist media placing a wedge between “church” and “state.” They claim the church’s role in society is limited to prayer and works of mercy, and that the civic role of a Christian is, at most, voting. Many who strongly advocate against Christian activity in the public sphere today are the same ones who failed to respond properly and reasonably to the recent “pandemania.”

 

They use screeds against “Christian nationalism” to avoid participating in the public sphere and to justify what amounts to antinomianism: the belief that, because Christians are saved by grace alone through Jesus Christ’s death on the cross, living a godly life in accord with divine and moral law, and shaped by biblical principles, is at best optional. To think otherwise is smeared as “legalism.”

 

Orthodox believers of goodwill, however, will find that “Christian nationalism’s” theological and political implications by no means fall afoul of the doctrine and practice of historic Christianity. According to the best definition, “Christian nationalism” is basically synonymous with the term “Christendom,” something just about all Christians, until recently, considered a good thing.

 

The fearmongers even go so far as to malign “Christian culture” through its association with “Christian nationalism.” Their views are frighteningly aligned with those who advance communistic ideas that judge Western culture’s hallmarks, such as Christian values, as harmful and destructive to society.

 

As every attentive Christian is well aware, these ideologies have been revealed as anti-Christian, unveiled in critical theory, which seeks to demonize Western civilization and Christendom, and to replace it with absurd alternatives that assault the very pillars upon which the West is founded. Even the new atheists appreciate the invaluable benefits of Christian civilization as the best option to all other alternatives.

 

Historically, the relationship between church and state in the West was symbiotic: The church prayed, rebuked, and advised civil rulers, who then preserved the ministry of the church from external interference. Jesus Christ was acknowledged to be Lord of both realms, although in distinctive ways.

 

Even the founding fathers of the United States did not boast a rigid separation of “church and state.” The iconic language was intended to protect the life of the church from overreach from the state, not the other way around.

 

Even if one would dare to argue that communism and globalism meet the material needs of their constituents, they have consistently proven to stifle and maim God’s beloved creation, the church, and the gospel. Klaus Schwab, former leader of the World Economic Forum and considered one of the five most influential people on the globe, had a clear agenda to penetrate world governments with policies that subverted the interests of Christians. Christians are wise to refrain from understating the influence of such deliberate agendas to silence Christ in the public sphere.

 

In the recent American election, Christians were free not to vote for Donald Trump, but it was hardly justifiable for any of them to vote for his adversary based on her anti-Christian policy recommendations alone, symbolized by the strategic decision to position a portable abortion clinic in front of the Democrat convention in Chicago.

 

To reject “Christian culture” as a positive contribution to “secular” public space is to welcome any number of other religious cultures to take its place. When former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau first arrived in office, he boasted that Canada has no shared values: “Canada is becoming a new kind of country, not defined by our history or European national origins, but by a pan-cultural heritage,” he said. [Blog Editor: Apparently Trudeau succeeded because Canadians just placed their version neo-Marxists in power by giving the Liberal Party an election victory in the Canadian Parliamentary system.]

 

“There is no core identity,” as Canada is “the first post-national state,” Trudeau said. He also said, “There is a level of admiration I actually have for China because of their basic dictatorship.” There is no indication that his replacement, Mark Carney, thinks any differently.

 

What fills the dark vacuum remaining when Christian culture is chased away? Look around you and see the bombardment of Western civilization once founded upon God’s Word and Christ’s church. God is the sovereign Lord of all human institutions and history, and faith in God’s providence has never justified a retreat from vocational obligations in the public sphere and the gifts of God of which we are called to be godly stewards.

 

Furthermore, Christians who criticize and discourage active Christian political participation indirectly embrace a national anti-Christian religion that unabashedly pursues the demise of the Kingdom of God and the gospel on earth. Which is a greater threat to church and society: the rhetorical phantom of Christian nationalism, or the real phenomenon of Christian apathy?

 

A longer version of this article first appeared in the theology journal Gottesdienst.

 

The Rev. Dr. Maj. (ret.) Harold Ristau is president of Luther Classical College in Casper, Wyoming. Ristau was born in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, and has served as a parish pastor, military chaplain, African missionary, and seminary professor. The author of several theological books and numerous shorter works, he is married with five children and one grandchild.

 

© 2025 The Federalist, A wholly independent division of FDRLST Media. All rights reserved.


Saturday, December 7, 2013

To those who say there is no war on Christmas

There is a war on Christianity and a war on Christmas in the United States of America. Detractors cry foul that no such thing is happening in the good old USA. Tim Wildmon of the American Family Association (AFA) shows how the detractors of the existence of a war on Christianity and Christmas are either deluded or down right deceptive.

JRH 12/7/13 (Hat Tip: AFA email)
**********************************
ACLU at Nativity Scene toon
To those who say there is no war on Christmas

By Tim Wildmon
December 05, 2013
AFA.net Guest Column

Christmas is the most notable day on the calendar where the general American public is reminded of the life of Jesus Christ. That is why some want to do away with it.

Someone sent me an article from USA Today, which has this headline: "Not all Christians believe there is a 'War on Christmas.'" The article quotes Christian leaders and authors saying they disagree with those of us who believe there is a war on Christmas. I could give a litany of examples of exactly how the war on Christmas has manifested itself the last decade or so. From nativity scenes no longer being allowed on the courthouse square, to schools changing Christmas break to "winter" break, from Christmas parades being changed to "winter" parades, to children being told they can no longer sing carols during their "winter" program, etc., etc. There is an intentional effort by some secularists to purge the word 'Christmas' from our culture. Whether it will be successful or not remains to be seen. But it's discouraging to see some fellow Christians say – "Who cares?"

The very word itself – "Christmas" – is a reminder that this particular holiday is the celebration of Jesus Christ. Those who promote political correctness and extreme multiculturalism resent this because it is exclusionary in their view. Some Christians are willing to go along with that line of thinking. For example, USA Today quoted Dan Scott, senior pastor of Christ Church in Nashville, who said this: "We really need a way to treat the public square as the public square and private realms as private realms and not feel demonized because we come from a different perspective." In other words, Christians should keep Christmas in our homes and churches – the "private realms" – but we can't expect the general public to be accepting of Christmas any longer because it promotes Christianity.

Christmas is the exaltation of one particular religion that makes a claim of being the only true religion and that is unacceptable to the movers and shakers of contemporary American popular culture, elitist academia, and many in the mainstream media, news, and entertainment. Therefore, Christmas must be replaced with words and ideas that are broad and general so as to knock Christmas from its traditional place in America's public life. It is an attempt to define Christianity as no more important to the history and fabric of America than is, say, Hinduism. This is what these people (often called secular progressives) believe, and evidently a number of Christians agree with that position. Subsequently these Christians find more fault with their fellow believers – those of us who want to keep Christ in Christmas and Christmas in America – than they do with those who want to eradicate Christmas.

This is why it concerns me when I read stories like the one in USA Today. One of the people quoted in the article is Christian author Rachel Held Evans, best known for her book, A Year of Biblical Womanhood. Evans wrote a blog that went viral where she challenges the idea of a war on Christmas with these questions: "Did someone threaten your life, safety, civil liberties or right to worship?" No. "Did someone wish you happy holidays?" Yes. "You are not being persecuted."

What Evans has done here is very clever. She framed the issue falsely. She set up a straw man. No one is arguing that Christians are being persecuted physically. What we are saying is Christianity itself is under siege in America. Just ask the Christian bakery owners in Washington state, the Christian florist in Colorado, or the Christian photographer in New Mexico who were all fined by their state governments because they would not participate in homosexual "weddings." But what Evans has done is like the man who cheats on his wife and she confronts him about it. It might go something like this:

"I know you are cheating on me. What do you have to say for yourself?" the wife says. To which the husband responds: "There are children dying in sweatshops in Third World countries, and you are talking to me about my having sex a couple of times with some woman? Are you serious?"

See how this works? The "logic" is: If your life is not being threatened or your family is not in physical danger or your church is not being padlocked, then we have no cause to point out the war of Christmas. It's much ado about nothing, say these Christian brothers.

The war on Christmas is really part of the larger war on Christianity and it concerns me that smart people like Rev. Scott and Evans don't seem to get that.

Then there was the quote from Daniel Darling, vice president of communications for the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission. The article said this about his position: "He (Darling) said on Friday that some media outlets are overstating the war on Christmas debate, and very few Christians actually engage in it. 'We advise people that, rather than trying to force that weary Wal-Mart worker to say 'Merry Christmas' against company policy, how about we be the bearers of joy. Instead of taking offense, say, 'Here's the story, we're the joyful ones. We're the ones that have the greatest story.'"

Darling, like Evans, has created a false caricature of his fellow Christians who want to keep Christmas alive in the public square. The image Darling creates is one of a Christian bully. Who does this browbeating of store employees? No one I know. (By the way, Wal-Mart does not forbid its employees from wishing customers a "Merry Christmas.") What American Family Association and some other groups do is produce a Naughty & Nice list of companies that do or don't allow Christmas in their stores. Due to the efforts of AFA, many household name corporations have put Christmas back in their promotions, advertisements, and stores over the last few years. The Gap was the latest store to write AFA about how they were doing this. This is a good thing. Christians should applaud Gap and others when they refuse to yield to political correctness and recognize that if not for the Christmas gift-buying season, many of them would not be in business.

All of this Christians criticizing other Christians, often based on false information as demonstrated here, seems to be a trend. I'm not sure why this is, but I have a couple of theories. First, we Bible-believing Christians have been so maligned and lied about by the media, particularly the entertainment and news media, that the negative stereotype that has been created has stuck. And now even we are quick to believe the worst about our fellow brothers and sisters. The second reason is what I call the "nicer than Jesus" mentality. It is human nature to want to be liked and avoid confrontation. Christian activism, while it should always be carried out with civility and manners, is sometimes by necessity confrontational – and confrontation is not considered "nice" by some. But Jesus himself said in Matthew 5:10: "Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." Jesus is talking here about a public stand for biblical righteousness, not just being a Christian. The world doesn't care if you are Christian ... as long as you don't talk about what's right and wrong, moral and immoral, or good and evil. That's when the persecution comes.

Is there a war on Christmas? Yes. Is it part of a larger war on Christianity? Yes. Does this matter to the future of our country? Most certainly.

Just because Christians are not being physically persecuted in America today doesn't mean these matters are not important. Not only is Christianity good for the individual, the moral value system that comes from Christianity is also good for society at large. God help us get it back before it's too late.
__________________________________________
Tim Wildmon (contact@afa.net) is president of the American Family Association in Tupelo, MS. This column is printed with permission.

This column is printed with permission. Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by OneNewsNow.com are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, OneNewsNow.com, our parent organization or its other affiliates.

All Original Content Copyright ©2006-2013 American Family News Network - All Rights Reserved.

"OneNewsNow", "OneNewsNow.com", and the "OneNewsNow World" logo, are Trademarks of the American Family News Network - All Rights Reserved.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

The Season is Emerging to Battle Against Christianity

Birth of Christ - Nativity Scene
John R. Houk
© October 12, 2013
 
There has been an open war by Leftists and atheists on Christianity for some time in the USA. Thanks to Madalyn Murray O'Hair (focus on Communist Connection), the Supreme Court reinterpreted the Establishment (or is it Disestablishment [Full PDF of link]) Clause of the First Amendment to go beyond preventing the government from establishing a State Church but to include that anything representative of taxpayer money must exclude Christianity. The annual Christmas period of the year is when this war on Christianity seems to rear up on a national basis in the media. Hence the war on Christianity becomes the war on Christmas.
 
Too many Corporations (AFA 2012 Naughty or Nice List) operate stores that have fallen prey to the concept that it is politically incorrect to promote Christmas because it promotes Christianity. AND any promotion of Christianity might be offensive to a minority of people in the USA that would prefer to distant themselves from any open association with Christianity; e.g. atheists, Muslims, Jews and perhaps other identifiable anti/non-Christian entities. This PC marketing is idiotic and an insult to the majority of Americans that relish the Christmas season as a time of giving, compassion and just a downright period of joy. I mean Americans who are not particularly religiously observant of the Christian faith still make this a time of family get together and enjoy an interruption from the daily tasks of the old J-O-B.
 
Corporations do have a Constitutional right to utilize whatever marketing strategy they deem fit; however as a Christian I find it nauseating when Christianity is the focus of diminishment to accommodate some foolish PC concept of multicultural diversity. Even more nauseating though is when Leftists and atheists impose their sanitized and/or ungodly beliefs on those that embrace Christianity via the taxpayer support Public venues. The imposition is exacted by using “Living Constitution” (Constitutionalist Criticism) parameters rather than “Original Intent” (In support of Original IntentNeutral Explanation) parameters in the Constitution to make sure the bedrock of America’s morality is not supported whatsoever. The result of this legal ploy of redefining the meaning of the Constitution has successfully turned America into which families are divided, single parent families are as common as heterosexual families, homosexuals are allowed to raise children further warping the societal fabric and a host of other deviations I am certain you can think of that escape my memory as of this writing.
 
The result of this moral dilution in America’s family unit has led to a society in which public dishonesty overrules the decency of honesty, children need protected on their routes to and from school, armed guards are becoming common place on Public School grounds, children bring weapons to harm others singularly or on a multiple basis, children are told they cannot play traditional play acting any longer (such as cops and robbers, cowboys and Indians, etc.) because imaginary weapons may inspire real weapons, childhood aggression is increasingly common (such as bullying – physical or cyber), underage children – most often teenagers – are increasingly enabled on a parental level to participate in rabble-rousing partying that includes drinking, sex, property destruction, drugs, teen pregnancy and MORE.
 
These societal behaviors are a direct result of the Leftist and atheistic assault to prevent Christianity from being an integral part of American Culture in the name of Multicultural Diversity.
 
The first anti-Christmas story I heard this was a Public School imposing restrictions on an annual High School Christmas Carol Concert due to concerns of a phrase that is found NO WHERE in the Constitution called Separation of Church and State. Here is a good synopsis of how this anti-Christmas story developed:
 
The state of Wisconsin once again sits center stage in the War on Christmas. The Wausau School District has issued an edict about Christmas music that has caused several school associated music groups to either disband or cancel December performances.
 
Phil Buch, who has directed Wausau West High School’s choral programs since 1981, said the decision to halt rehearsals for the Master Singers was made after a meeting Thursday with district officials and Frank Sutherland, an attorney who represents the school district.
 
Buch said district administrators gave music educators at Wausau schools three options for December concerts, which typically contain a significant amount of religious music: choose five secular, or non-religious, songs for each religious song performed; hold a concert and have no holiday music whatsoever; or postpone any concerts in December. Because the 20-member Master Singers group is invited to sing at nearly a dozen holiday concerts each year, Buch said, those options were unacceptable.
 
“This group sings at Christmas programs,” Buch said. “We sing for nursing homes, grade schools, businesses. To do that without Christmas music doesn’t make sense.”
 
District administrators did not return calls Friday seeking information about the rules, but Wausau School Board President Michelle Schaefer said the change in direction stems from legal concerns over the amount of religious music performed in the schools. The decision will not eliminate religious music altogether but will give teachers a better idea as to how much religious music is “too much,” Schaefer said.
 
“From a School Board perspective, we look for music that is balanced,” Schaefer said. “Yes, we are a predominantly Christian society, but we are also a society of many faiths, and we want to respect that.”
 
(Wisconsin School District Cancels Christmas; By Editor; Defend Christmas; 10/6/13)
 
I actually first heard this story on Fox News but the below story is an excellent synopsis. This first shot over the bow against Christmas has an early victorious ending. Evidently once this story went viral the School Board relented on this attack on the Christian faith. Here is a story I found about this victory in Jesus.
 
JRH 10/12/13
***************************
Wisconsin Christmas Music Battle Goes Viral; Students Claim Victory
 
By Kallsign Snoopy
October 11, 2013
 
We reported the story last Sunday — the media ran with it Tuesday. By Wednesday Freedom From Religion Foundation got in on the act. It appears to be the first big national story in the War on Christmas 2013.
 
In an update after a late Thursday meeting with the school district students and parents are claiming victory and that the Christmas concerts are now back on — with traditional Christmas music put back in place.
 
Here’s the issue: without warning the choir director at West High School in Wausau, Wisconsin was called to discuss plans for the upcoming music events to be held in December. It was reported early on that Wausau schools three options for December concerts, which typically contain a significant amount of religious music: choose five secular, or non-religious, songs for each religious song performed; hold a concert and have no holiday music whatsoever; or postpone any concerts in December. The choir director was outraged and in response he opted not only to cancel concerts — he disbanded the music groups who would traditionally perform.
 
The school district claims it is merely making sure they don’t violate the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution (because educators in Wisconsin have SUCH a great track record with constitutional issues). They also say now they never came up with the plan to perform a certain amount of secular songs for every religious song performed. They claim that was a “misunderstanding”.
 
Needless to say, as with many battles we’ve seen before about Christmas in public schools, this one too will end with someone being very unhappy.
Freedom from Religion Foundation president Annie Laurie Gaylor claims no responsibility in this latest fight but was quick to pitch in with FFRF’s support of the school district:
 
“There can be a fine line, and we understand in some instances there can be sacred classical music in the schools, but it’s so easy for something like this to turn into a message of indoctrination. When you have a chorus going out to 15 places to sing religious music, it really does give the appearance that the school is celebrating Christianity.”
 
Yes, Christianity as gained so many converts over the decades by going to nursing homes to sing “Silent Night”.
 
The tip off of a problem was that the school choir director met with school district officials with an attorney present. In other words, they were ready for a fight.
 
According to a story on The Blaze tonight, the choir director at West High is known for his religious nature.
 
All this intense attention to the issue appears to have been resolved as of late Thursday. The Wausau School District has backed off on the requirements and have left the decision of local program content to school principals.
 
The crux of the issue comes down to this: when a school group performs Christmas music with religious themes does it in fact constitute promotion of that religion? The “establishment clause” prohibits the “establishment”…does a school group singing actually do that?
 
Oh, and by the way, where exactly in the Constitution is the establishment clause?
 
Another silly chapter in the War on Christmas.
 
(I am glad that this all got cleared up but I really wish people would get it through their heads that there is no such thing as an “establishment” clause. There is a “Government shall make no law” clause. And it only applies to the Congress. Leave my Christmas alone! If you don’t like it, don’t celebrate it. Just don’t ruin it for everyone else!
 
Publius)
___________________________
The Season is Emerging to Battle Against Christianity
John R. Houk
© October 12, 2013
________________________
Wisconsin Christmas Music Battle Goes Viral; Students Claim Victory
 
Retired warrior, Full time pilot, Part time political blogger. Always a Patriot. Amateur Radio Operator - MORE