Justin Smith is sure to be ridiculed as a racist as he
writes the truth about Martin Luther King, Jr. that I bet most of you are
clueless of the documented facts.
Look at today’s Black race-baiters who were considered
colleagued/disciples of MLK (e.g. so-called Rev. Jesse Jackson and Al
Sharpton). You have to wonder if MLK wasn’t martyred by assassination,
would he be deified with a National Holiday and near American sainthood? Read
these documented MLK facts and you might wonder alongside me.
(Yeah, I am aware MLK Day has come and gone in 2022, but
the facts remain the same.)
At the end of the Justin essay I am adding a roughly
45-minute documentary on MLK that appears to line up with Justin’s details. The
documentary is presented in a sermon-style by Pastor Steven L. Anderson
on the Bitchute video platform.
JRH 1/19/22
I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome expenses:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
*************************
MLK: A Deeply Conflicted and Flawed Man
I'll Not Sing King's Praises
By Justin O. Smith
Sent January 17, 2022, 09:11:58 PM CST
Born
in Atlanta on January 15th 1929 and assassinated in Memphis on April 4th
1968, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a walking, talking paradox
and a man who both united and divided much of America, and since January 20th
1986 and the creation of a Martin Luther King Day, millions of Americans are
forced to watch him praised across all the major news networks, despite the
fact that in far too many respects, he was an anti-American radical in his last
years on earth and is unworthy of such a high praise.
I value the idea and sound principles behind Martin Luther
King, Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream' speech and the idea that all children of
all colors should be able to live fruitful, productive lives in America, as
they are judged on the content of their character and not the color of their
skin. And while it should go without saying, most of America would surely agree
today that Jim Crow laws and keeping the Black people of our country held as
second class citizens had to be ended, for America to become a better country
and a better society.
And yet, in his 'Letter from the Birmingham Jail', many of
his own thoughts were absolutely focused on the color of Americans' skin. Read
these thoughts from page 3 of his letter and tell me MLK's logic was based
on "colorblindness":
"I have almost reached the
regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride
toward freedom is not the White Citizens Councillor or the Ku Klux Klanner but
the white moderate who is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a
negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the
presence of justice; who constantly says, 'I agree with you in the goal you
seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action'; who
paternalistically feels that he can set a timetable for another man's freedom;
who lives by a myth of time; and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until
a 'more convenient season'. Shallow understanding from people of ill will.
Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."
But it was White America, in large part, that ensured King's
agenda would ultimately succeed and the Civil Rights Act of 1965 would be
passed. "Lukewarm acceptance"? Liberals, leftists, useful idiots of
the Communist Party of the USA and many misguided Americans have since gone on
to pass other "laws" and regulatory rules that have essentially
granted Black people privileges greater than the rights guaranteed in the Bill
of Rights, and Heaven forbid any law enforcement dares to try to keep hordes of
Black thugs from rioting, burning cities, including DC, or murdering, raping
and robbing anyone.
Yes, America can and should acknowledge the good actions
that our government finally took, as it was motivated by King's many hard
fought battles within the Civil Rights Movement to end the double standard
represented by Jim Crow laws, but all Americans must be honest about who MLK
really was, for posterity's sake and to ensure that we look deeper into all
future emerging movements and the people behind them. One has to look no
further than the Marxist inspired Black Lives Matter to see the common
sense within this admonishment.
It's unconscionable and unfathomable that American Conservatives
have had their tax dollars taken from them to support the memory of [JRH] a
known Communist sympathizer and collaborator, such as Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr.. And even more egregious, the modern day radicals and Communists
within the Democratic Party have succeeded in having a statue of MLK placed in
D.C., the nation's Capitol. Could the symbolism of such a statue
fashioned and made in Communist China by an actual Communist be
more heavy than this?
Whether or not MLK may have started out as a fairly
conservative preacher, in the early years of his ministry, which quite a few
pundits regularly assert, by the last decade of his life, [JRH] King
was surrounded and funded by outright Communists who sought to use
his charisma and advocacy for the Civil Rights Movement to subvert the United
States. [JRH] King
embraced [JRH] W.E.B.
Dubois and [JRH] Malcolm X,
both [JRH] anti-American
radicals and both Communists.
On October 18th 1983 during a famous speech in opposition to
the bill to make Martin Luther King Day a national holiday, Senator
Jesse Helms held up a 1957 photograph of MLK seated alongside known Communists
at a center for Communists in Monteagle, TN and he stated [Blog
Editor: In full disclosure Helms was a classic
Southern racist of his day and friendly
with fraudulently Chairman Biden]:
"Shown in the photograph
sitting adjacent to King are Abner Berry, a correspondent for the Communist
Party newspaper, The Daily Worker; Aubrey Williams, identified as a member of
the CPUSA and President of the SCEF [the Southern Conference Educational Fund];
and Myles Horton, a founder and director of the Highlander Folk School."
MLK
photo at Communist Training School
Helms continued
his filibuster with more evidence [page #28070] of King's Communist ties:
"The evidence demonstrates
convincingly that Martin Luther King, Jr. was buddybuddy with well-identified
communists from the early 1950s to the time of his death in 1968. Bayard
Rustin, a stalwart of the Young Communist League, was at one time King's
secretary. Hunter Pitts Odell, who in 1956 took the Fifth Amendment on
questions involving his communist activities, also served on King's staff.
The record is replete with
evidence linking King to the notorious Highlander Folk School, a communist
training center. King's close associates included such figures as Abner W.
Berry, James A. Dombrowski, Paul Crouch, and Carl and Anne Braden. The shadowy
figure of the late Stanley Levinson floated in and out of King's life ... The
FBI has traced it also, and finds evidence that for at least 10 years Levinson
played a secret role as a funnel of money from the Communist Party to various
communist fronts."
MLK would never have had the rapid success he saw at the
national level, if not for the promotion and publicity and funding and support
provided him by radicals, subversives and communists, such as Stanley David
Levinson, one of his advisors, and Communist groups. The FBI was well aware of
MLK's chummy attitude with Amerrikan Marxists, but most of America is totally
unaware of this association, even today. And if one takes Levinson's assessment
of King as remotely close, King apparently wasn't quite capable of making so
rapid a climb on his own.
An FBI
document from the era noted:
"Levinson ... proposed that
King should lead a march [in Cleveland, Ohio] of 10,000 Negroes, each one of
them carrying a brick or a bottle. ... and dump [them] on the lawn of
[Cleveland] City Hall as a symbol of protest to the racial situation. [Clarence
Jones and Levinson] agreed ... and thought King would lead such a march. ...
Further, they agreed that under no circumstances should King be permitted to
say anything without their approving it. Jones advised that he feels King
should not be permitted to think for himself, [and] Levinson stated that King
is such a slow thinker he is usually not prepared to make a statement by
himself without help."
I'll bet a hundred dollars against a stale donut that those
bricks would have busted more windows than littered lawns had this plan come to
fruition.
In addition to this, one might ask what is more of a
betrayal to the Christian principles that founded America and the teachings of
Jesus as they relate to human rights and life than for one to support abortion,
baby murder. And yet, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the supposed staunch
Christian evangelist, supported and even spoke of Margaret Sanger, an evil,
Machiavellian abortionist, in
glowing terms, even in light of her attempted genocide against Black
people through the eugenics driven Negro Project [1939-1942], and he supported
Planned Parenthood. King
saw unplanned pregnancies as "a cruel evil" that "urgently
need[ed] ... control." He was later awarded the Margaret Sanger Award from
Planned Parenthood in 1966.
[Blog Editor: Further reading on Margaret Sanger, MLK and
Black genocide:
o The
Negro Project: Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Plan for Black Americans; By CWALAC
Staff; Concerned Women for America;
5/1/01
o The
Negro Project and Margaret Sanger’s proto-Nazism; By Ellis Washington; Ellis Washington Report;
12/6/15
o Margaret
Sanger: “We Want to Exterminate the Negro Population.” Her Wish is Coming True;
By Patrina Mosley; LifeNews.com;
3/10/20]
Far from what anyone should call a "good
Christian", MLK
was a heretic, who denied the divine nature of Jesus. His
so-called "theology" was extremely liberal, as seen in papers he
wrote at the Crozer Theological Seminary, rejecting faith and the Virgin
Birth for "objective (thinking)" and stripping the notion of Jesus as
the Son of God, the virgin birth and the bodily Resurrection of Jesus Christ
from his version of "Christianity". He noted that the ideas of
salvation, the atonement for one's sins and the second coming of Christ were
fundamentalist notions that stand in the way of adapting Christianity to social
and cultural change.
King did not believe these doctrines and rejected them as
superstitions, even though the doctrines he rejected were fundamental to
Biblical Christianity. And he never repudiated his written views, as he went
on to preach a twisted, bastardized, leftist brand of something he attempted to
pass off as "Christianity; in reality, [JRH] he
was preaching under the banner of Black Liberation Theology and
restructuring Christianity to construct his own story of the world and appeal
to the downtrodden peoples' longing for freedom, to serve his own agenda and
political purposes.
[Blog Editor: You need to be aware of the anti-Christian
nature of Black Liberation Theology:
o The
Marxist roots of black liberation theology; By ANTHONY B. BRADLEY,
PHD; Acton Institute; 4/2/08
o Obama,
Black Liberation Theology, and Karl Marx; By Kyle-Anne Shiver;
American Thinker; 5/28/08
o Black liberation
theology; Conservapedia; Page
last “modified” 12/23/20 16:34]
Nowhere in King's messages would one hear Jesus presented as
our Savior. His messages were aligned with the deliverance of Israel from their
slavery in Egypt, and during his famous 'I've
Been to the Mountaintop' speech, he mentioned the Exodus but not
the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
As a curious aside, it's most interesting to find that
Joe Biden supported segregation in the early years of his Senate career,
that started in 1973, despite his many decades long assertion he actually
supported desegregation. He was also great friends with many other supporters
of segregation in the Senate, such as Senator Strom Thurmond and Senator
Robert Byrd, who also just happened to be a one time member of the Ku Klux
Klan.
[Blog Editor: Interestingly, it appears the Washington
Examiner has purged critical links of fraudulently elected Biden. Justin
provides this link about Biden embracing segregation:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/joe-biden?source=%2Fpolitics%2Fjoe-biden-embraced-segregation-in-1975-claiming-it-was-a-matter-of-black-pride.
When I went to the Washington Examiner to locate the article, I couldn’t find
it. BUT I found some websites that referenced the Washington Examiner article:
o Joe
Biden embraced segregation in 1975; Posted by Geller Report Staff;
Geller Report; 6/29/20
o Joe
Biden Embraced Segregation In 1975, Claiming It Was A Matter Of 'Black Pride';
Dated “3 years ago” with link to Washington Examiner that redirects to Biden
tags: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/joe-biden-embraced-segregation-in-1975-claiming-it-was-a-matter-of-black-pride;
The News Talkers
o Joe
Biden Embraced Segregation in 1975, Claiming It Was a Matter of ‘Black Pride’;
By Alana Goodman (Washington Examiner, January 31, 2019); American Renaissance; posted 2/1/19
o JOE
BIDEN EMBRACED SEGREGATION IN 1975, CLAIMING IT WAS A MATTER OF ‘BLACK PRIDE’:
‘A rejection of the entire black awareness concept’; Posted By Grabien
Staff; Grabien News;
posted 2/4/19 10:00 AM (includes racist Biden clip)
The Washington Examiner apparently also scrubbed
this post linking Biden to racist Senators Thurmond and Byrd: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/joe-biden?source=%2Fpolitics%2Fbiden-praised-segregationist-strom-thurmond-as-closest-friend-who-believed-in-heterogenous-diverse-society.
Now some other websites the Washington Examiner link and a bonus link to Biden’s
other racist buddies:
o Biden
praised segregationist Strom Thurmond as 'closest friend'; By Alana
Goodman; WREC News Talk
- The
Ben Ferguson Show; 5/3/19
o Joe
Biden Praised Notorious Segregationist As 'Closest Friend,' Unearthed Video
Shows; By Damir
Mujezinovic; INQUISITR;
5/6/19
o Flashback: Biden Praised
Segregationist Strom Thurmond as ‘Closest Friend’ Who Believed in
‘Heterogenous, Diverse Society’; Biden Video Clip; Grabien News; no date on post
o ‘Deep
personal relationships’: Joe Biden’s six segregationist friends; Original
Post Washington
Examiner (also purged); Republican
Win! Daily Briefing; no date]
Photo
from above post: Strom
Thurmond, Jesse Helms, John Stennis, James O. Eastland, Herman Talmadge &
George Wallace
Wasn't it ironic that Joe Biden recently invoked the names
of Bull Connor and George Wallace, fellow Democrats, in comparison to today's
Republicans?
Even more curious, America now sees a large segment of the Black
population that supports a renewed brand of segregation across our country and
a new racism directed at White people and the founding of America. These young
radicals see White people as people who must now be silenced, reviled,
controlled and even oppressed, if not killed outright.
Biden is radical and subversive to American principles, and
so too was Dr Martin Luther King, Jr.
King was a red, radical Communist who wanted to directly
redistribute America's wealth in accordance with the economics of Marx and
Lenin, and although he preached "non-violence" and "civil
disobedience", he and his followers regularly violated the criminal laws.
King also allowed his name and prestige to be used freely for events sponsored
by Communist fronts, as he did in 1967 for the National Conference for New
Politics in Chicago, where he appeared as the main speaker. The events
sponsors, to name a few, included the Communist Party USA, The W.E.B DuBois
Clubs, the Draft Resistance Union, the Socialist Workers Party and the
Revolutionary Action Movement.
Yes, King did facilitate many good things within his
movement, but he was a deeply conflicted and flawed man too, and he wasn't
really working to make America better in the end. He was a radical at odds with
America's founding principles, whose few solid ideas have now been warped,
manipulated and bastardized to such an incredibly high degree, that America
finds the Marxist/Maoist Communists of Black Lives Matter and the white-hating
racists of Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam and the New Black Panthers using
them as cover to do their dirty, destructive work against America.
No one will hear me singing King's praises in the coming
days.
By Justin O. Smith
______________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Embedded source links are by Justin Smith except when
indicated by “JRH.” Content embraced by brackets are by the Editor. Bold
text indicates Editorial agreement.
© Justin O. Smith
Blog Editor: While verifying these stunning facts presented
by Justin Smith, I ran into a documentary on MLK presented sermon-style by Kim Osbøl which was posted on Bitchute 1/18/22. Osbøl
acquired the documentary from the Angel White
Youtube Channel who some how acquired it from Pastor Steven L. Anderson
who put the documentary together in 2015. I say “some how acquired” because my
searches of Anderson preaching show Youtube removing the video, which is the
reason I use this Bitchute version. Left-Wing
Wikipedia lists all the reasons Pastor Anderson is hated by Left which sadly
includes Antisemitism. Death threats and Jew-hatred if true are not a
good thing and I am not going to take the time to see if Wikipedia is placing
their Leftist overemphasis on the guy. Here is a bit more favorable
Anderson-profile I stumbled upon just before closing Duck Duck Go: https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Truths/soulwinners_are_heroes.htm.
Here is Pastor Steven L. Anderson providing the
Christian perspective on MLK which I believe lines up with Justin Smith’s
essay.
Bitchute VIDEO: ANGEL WHITE: MARXIST
LUCIFER KING (MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DOCUMENTARY) [17.01.2022]
Posted by Kim Osbøl - Copenhagen Denmark
- Kim Osbøl
First Published January 18th, 2022 07:59 UT
A film by Steven L Anderson - http://www.faithfulwordbaptist.org/
I find it extremely interesting that occultist Aleister
Crowley died aged 72 on December 1st,1947. 72 years later on the very same day
was when the first patient to be diagnosed with 2019-nCoV (COVID 19) December
1st, 2019.
