John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© February 17, 2025
I just read an interesting post from THE EXPOSÉ entitled, “How
conspirators precondition a society to accept tyranny”.
In America if you are a devotee of the Democratic Party (BETTER
DESCRIPTION: Dem-Marxist Party), the devotee might have to re-wire their
brain-function apparatus to comprehend the information in this essay.
WHY?
Because the Dem-Devotee has been wired or preconditioned to
accept tyranny as the way society should be managed.
If you are a Patriot believing in the traditions of American
Exceptionalism, Individual Liberty and an Originalist Constitution; THEN this
is a must read to understand how a dumb sap Dem-Devotee can sell out his nation
to tyranny.
Understanding the Dem-Devotee Sap does not mean the
enlightened has to put up with such un-American idiocy. If Dem-Tyrants had
gained the full of reins of power, there was a good chance WE PATRIOTS would
have been sent to reeducation camps to be brainwashed into the elements that
make a good Dem-Devotee.
The best way to reeducate the Dem-Devotee brainwashed is to
remove the Tyrants and the machinations of tyranny from the ability to
function.
HENCE, President Trump’s Department of Government
Efficiency (DOGE) removing tyrannical machinations and removing the
funding to tyrannize.
THE EXPOSÉ essay is actually a cross post of Aussie
political writer Paul Collits. Most of the illustrations are from the tyranny
experienced in Australia which from the essay remarkably mirrors the American
tyranny of the installed Biden regime. The last few paragraphs touch on the
American experience of the Trump Administration attacking the ingrained tyranny
via the DOGE.
AND NOW – THE ESSAY!
JRH
2/17/25
READER SUPPORTED!
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL - one-time or recurring).
PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for
Liberty:
Please Support SlantRight 2.0
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by
offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good
tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee
& Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com
>>DRINK
COFFEE-MANAGE WEIGHT or MAKE SOME EXTRA CASH<<
**********************************
How Conspirators Precondition a Society to Accept Tyranny
Hand Full of Pawns (THE
EXPOSÉ Photo)
By Rhoda Wilson
February 16, 2025
THE
EXPOSÉ
Conspirators use tools such as labelling truth-tellers as
“conspiracy theorists” and propagandising the public to silence them and
maintain control.
Another tool is staffing organisations with “clone
thinkers” who won’t question the narrative. To achieve this, the establishment
populates key institutions with compliant people, using tactics such as
ideological onboarding, unconscious bias training and enforcing narratives
through, for example, lack of promotion or disciplinary action for those who do
not comply.
Most conspiracy theories are actually theories found in
political science. So, another tool is to place a yawning gap between
“conspiracy theory” and “political science.”
The creation of controlled opposition is also a tool used
by the conspirators. The purpose of controlled opposition is to build trust
before redirection. By doing so, unified movements are dissolved into smaller
fragments, leading to division and inaction.
Prerequisites
to Tyranny
By Paul
Collits
According to one definition: A conspiracy is simply
two or more people or organisations working in tandem to perpetrate a nefarious
crime or fraud … or conceal or cover up activities that, if exposed, would
harm certain people and organisations.
Conspiracy Theorists
One of the tools of conspirators is to label the people –
often not many – who are onto them as, yes, conspiracy theorists. To silence
them. And, in the case of pretend journalists like Peter Hoysted (Jack the
Insider), to humiliate them over and over. His salary is paid by Rupert
Murdoch, by the way. Another tool is to propagandise the punters. As Josh
Stylman has argued, quoting Theodore Dalrymple:
“In my study of communist
societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda
was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and
therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are
forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even
worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and
for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way
to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and
even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.”
This principle of forced participation hasn’t disappeared –
it has evolved. Today’s system doesn’t merely demand silence but active
complicity in its narratives …
Read more: The
Second Matrix: Break the Controlled Awakening, Brownstone
Institute, 14 February 2025
Staff Organisations With The Compliant
There is another tool used by propagandising conspirators,
aka the tyrannical state. This one takes some work. In a typically excellent
article at The Brownstone Institute, titled ‘In
Defence of Conspiracy Theorists’, Bill Rice argues:
As a bonafide conspiracy
theorist, I’ve come to believe the world’s most important conspiracies would be
impossible to pull off absent a prior conspiracy to staff these
organisations with clone thinkers who will never question or challenge the
official narrative.
His logic is simple. And it supports the view that
conspiracies are real and routine. Because if the institutions conspiring to
dud customers or electors or whomever have thought far enough ahead to people
their institutions with signed-up automatons, then it all was deliberate! A
virtuous logical circle.
Having worked in both corporate universities and government
agencies, I can attest to Rice’s conclusions. If you step outside the corporate
narratives, you are going to be shown the door, in short shrift. Or denied
promotion. Or denied interesting projects. Or kept out of research grant
application teams. Or hauled into the CEO’s office for correction or
counselling. James Cook University, just down the road from my current abode,
did the first of these things to an outstanding scholar called Peter Ridd.
My recent experience with (God help us all) the Australian
public health system suggests organisations full of butt protectors, yes men
and women, narrative protectors and “good” corporate citizens. Anyone who has
worked for a large institution knows this. Cover-ups of a minor or major nature
occur every hour of the day, for example. Risk management 101. A whole army of
consultants gets rich by advising on how to do it. Every corporate and
government agency now has a media unit. To feed the chooks, as Sir Joh used to
say. Really?
Populating key institutions with the compliant explains the
success of the whole covid scam. See under Jack the Insider, again. Of course.
The climate scam. See under school teachers. And all the other state scams,
too. It is the way the world works. Generations of incoming employees are
ideologically onboarded. See under unconscious bias training.
And as Bill Rice would recognise, the devil’s second
greatest trick was to get the CIA to convince the world that truth-tellers were
“conspiracy theorists”. Just like Satan’s greatest trick – convincing the world
that he doesn’t exist – it has worked! The modern midwit left has signed up,
lock, stock and whole freaking barrel. Ironically, doing the dirty work of the
supposed corporate enemy. The class enemy. I still haven’t figured that one
out. And not just what we still call “the left,” of course. The establishment
right, personified by the likes of Toby Young, are on board with the dissing of
conspiracy theorists.
Locking up the corporate loyalty system is critical to the
control agenda.
I have written before about the theory of positive deviants.
Those rare beasts within corporates who are actually there to help solve
problems, to challenge orthodoxies in doing so, to serve the public (or
customer) interest, in spite of their assigned roles of corporate
self-protection, to admit corporate error and to break through enforced
narratives. Sometimes they whisper things to you. Like what hospital nurses say
about doctors. They definitely whisper.
One in four corporate employees is suggested by the
consultant Mark
Strom to be a positive deviant.
You might get lucky. The rest are what Bill Rice might think
of as enlisted soldiers of the narrative. Obey or be sacked. Most employees
want to pay the bills and put food on the family table. We have all been there.
There are several sub-classes of corporate hacks. There are
those who actually believe the ideology. They have been prepped at school and
university, with green, woke religion. Sadly, there are more of these than we
might expect. Then there are those who know it is all bullshit but who want to
“get ahead.” Or stay out of trouble. They are the chancer class. Then there are
the scaredy cats. Too frightened to go against the bosses’ agenda. Institutions
are full of these types.
Managing up is a corporate religion. And the powers-that-be
know this. They engineered the whole managerial revolution to achieve it. See
under HR and MBAs.
Create a Gap between Conspiracy Theory and Political
Science
Of course, most conspiracy theories turn out to be simply
Pol Sci 101. Modern adaptations of public choice theory, for example. Of
bureaucratic capture, as one (very important) example. This theory exposes the
private interests of public officials and their motives in building coalitions
with private actors. It is essentially a theory of public corruption.
The establishment’s best tactic has been to place a yawning
gap between “conspiracy theory” and “political science.” My mission has always
been to collapse the distance between the two.
Which brings us to Hannah Arendt, one of the twentieth
century’s leading political science and history scholars.
Her book, ‘The Origins of Totalitarianism’, was
a historical examination of the rise of Hitler, in particular. It was also
about preconditions. About the easing of populations into readiness for
tyranny. The subtle moving of people into acceptance of it. It worked so well
because the prepping was so well constructed and planned. Wikipedia
summarises the thesis:
In this book, Arendt argues that
totalitarianism was a “novel form of government,” that “differs essentially
from other forms of political oppression known to us such as despotism, tyranny
and dictatorship” in that it applied terror to subjugate mass populations
rather than just political adversaries.
Novel. Oppression. Terror. Whole populations. Ringing any
bells? Hannah hadn’t even heard of covid. Of the World Economic Forum. Of Tony
Fauci. Of bioweapons. Of the Department of Homeland Security. Of Wuhan
laboratories. Of Davos. Of the new world order.
Let us assume that Bill Rice’s account of the new tyranny
was planned. The success of the strategy proves the conspiracy. It means it was
planned. It could only have worked that way. Quad erat demonstrandum.
That is the burden of Rice’s argument.
Bill Rice’s (brief) examination of the nature of narratives,
propaganda and the rolling out of a system of control is more a political
science approach than Arendt’s historical analysis. Regulatory capture is
critical to his framework of tyrannical conspiracy and to the building of
corporatism as a system of government.
The public choice theory works because everyone in the
establishment is a winner. Bureaucrats advance their careers and prestige.
Industries get goodies from the government. Rigging the rules easily beats the
harder task of winning in the marketplace. As Adam Smith long ago recognised.
Ministers get to cut ribbons and make announcables. They are all busy with the
exciting, day-to-day process of governance. While the puppeteers simply grin at
all the colour and movement, and continue to hold all the cards. Quietly and
(mostly) invisibly. They even meet once a year (in Davos) and tell us openly
what they are up to. They know that everyone will ignore them.
Bill Rice’s theory of tyranny prepping is also redolent of
the theory of the long march through the institutions. Crafted the Italian
Marxist Gramsci and refined by the German radical Rudi Dutschke. Get the team
in place. This was the master class of the Marxist pivot in the 1960s from
relying on the (useless) working class to the pursuing the capture of cultural
and political institutions. This is how you prepare institutions for their
historic role of cultural transformation. You populate them with willing cadres
of dumbo, willing, embedded social revolutionaries. You create career pathways
for goon-undergraduates to advance and to become performative puppets. You
“educate” them for their tasks.
Hey presto. Now, all of our institutions – media,
bureaucracy, political advisers, NGOs, university academics – are all singing
from the same song sheet. Crawling with willing sign-ups. They have been
prepped to believe in climate catastrophe, net zero, DEI, woke ideology,
globalism, mass immigration, feminism, the rainbow coalition. Every last corner
of the media has been captured. Even lifestyle channels are crawling with
lesbian couples looking for “an escape to the country.” Normalised. We have
been conditioned to say, all good.
The long march. The prepping. The origins of
totalitarianism. The CIA. The covid gaslighting and fear campaigns. The fact
checker class. The silencing and ridiculing of dissidents. The rigid
enforcement of narratives. The sophisticated propaganda. The censorship
industrial complex. It all happened. It is not our imagination.
Ducks in a row? If it wasn’t all a conspiracy … prove it.
Creating Controlled Opposition
Josh Stylman alerts us to one final tool of the
conspirators. Creating controlled opposition, dividing the awake and causing
them to dissolve into squabbling over minor matters.
This pattern of building trust before redirection reflects a
deeper system of control, operating on the ancient alchemical principle
of Solve
et Coagula – first dissolve (break apart), then coagulate (reform
under control). The process is precise: When people begin recognising
institutional deception, natural coalitions form across traditional divides.
Workers unite against central bank policies. Parents organise against
pharmaceutical mandates. Communities resist corporate land grabs.
But watch what happens next – these unified movements get
systematically dissolved. Consider how quickly unified resistance fractured
after 7 October, how the trucker protests dissolved into partisan narratives.
Each fragment splinters further -from questioning authority to competing
theories, from united action to tribal infighting.
Watch how the confidence game operates in truth movements:
First comes legitimate revelation – real documents, genuine whistle-blowers,
undeniable evidence. Trust builds through authentic insight. Then subtle
redirection begins. Just as they slice society into ever-smaller fragments
along political, racial and cultural lines, they splinter truth movements into
competing camps. Unity becomes division. Action becomes debate. Resistance
becomes content.
Just look at the post-covid micro “freedom” parties in
Australia. Monica Smit’s call for a coalition of the willing will inevitably
fall on deaf ears, as the UAP, One Nation, the Libertarians, Family First, the
Family Party and People First (Gerard Rennick) go their separate ways at the
coming Commonwealth election. And the winners are – the legacy parties, the
Greens and the Teals.
A million souls descended upon Canberra in early 2022 – the
convoy to Canberra – then promptly went home and did nothing much more. Like
the gay marriage no voters. ScoMo knew he could ignore the convoy brigade.
Literally ignore them. As did the other institutions of covid oppression.
The Liberal Party’s continued flipping of the bird at the
freedom movement, seen, for example, in its joining of Labor’s clever hate
speech legislation and the absence of a covid apology, shows that the latest
iteration of official Liberalism continues to ignore a third of the electorate.
Channelling Stylman and Bill Rice, it is a perfect example of building the
institutions of control and the architecture of tyranny.
What of the Convoy? No MAGA spirit and follow-up there. No
focus. No leadership. No strategy for revolution. Just looking at the Trump 47
campaign’s utter brilliance, exemplified in the manner of the creation of DOGE,
the contrast could not be greater.
Source: Ed
Dowd’s Telegram channel, 15 February 2025, and SCREW.GOV.
Meanwhile, a third of the Australian electorate remains
endlessly unrepresented. While the micro parties endlessly blather about the
deep state. And remain micro. The establishment is laughing.
Whether all of the tools described here pre-date the
tyranny, or are developed over time alongside the tyranny as the level of
tyrannical sophistication improves, hardly matters. What we are seeing is an
architecture of totalitarian conspiracy. And a mighty fine piece of global
skullduggery it is.
Footnote
FROM THE PAGE OF SCREW.GOV ON
FB
I came across a lawyer, Tom Renz, who actually read Trump’s
DOGE Executive Order and, expecting some illegal power grab, found it to be
airtight. Turns out Trump and Musk didn’t create anything. Obama did.
Obama created United States Digital Service (USDS) in 2014.
It was meant as a bureaucratic patch job to fix the Obamacare website meltdown.
Fast forward to 2025. Trump rebrands it DOGE (United States
DOGE Service). Keeps the acronym, keeps the funding, but gives it a whole new
mission: Find the Receipts Legally untouchable because it was already fully
funded and operational. Trump invokes 5 USC 3161, which allows him to create
temporary hiring authorities. DOGE teams get embedded inside every single
federal agency. Each team consists of a lawyer, HR rep, a zoomer nerd and an
investigator. They report to DOGE, not the agency they’re embedded in.
But wait, there’s more! Trump invokes 44 USC Chapter 35,
which governs federal IT and cybersecurity oversight. Since USDS was originally
an IT oversight body, DOGE now has full access to all federal data systems.
Yes, that’s right. All of them.
His executive order is written to block legal challenges.
Includes language that overrides conflicting executive orders. Orders every
agency to comply. Refusal means they violate presidential authority.
Congress can’t defund it because it’s not a new programme,
just a repurposed one. DOJ can’t sue for overreach because Trump used existing
laws exactly as written. Democrats trying to file legal challenges run into
standing issues because DOGE operates within existing frameworks.
About the Author
Paul
Collits is an Australian freelance writer, and independent
scholar and researcher with interests in politics, public policy, philosophy,
economics and education. He has worked in government, industry and the
university sector. He spent over 25 years working in economic development
and has published widely in Australian and international peer-reviewed and
other journals.
His recent writings on ideology, conservatism, politics,
religion, culture, education and police corruption have been published in such
journals as Quadrant, News Weekly and The
Spectator Australia. Collits regularly publishes articles on his
Substack page which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.
THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE
ABOUT THE EXPOSÉ
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
