Dr. Mercola has provided a detailed analysis of the entire 3-hour
Rogan/Malone interview trying to be vanquished by Big Tech which includes the
entire 3-hour video and an excerpt video (16-minutes) of follow-up questions
between Dr. Malone and Kristi Leigh. Unless you are more patient than I, I
suggest reading the Dr. Mercola text analysis prior to any lengthy video
viewing.
JRH 1/10/21
I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome expenses:
ØDecember
30, 2021, Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA
gene transfer technology. YouTube and Twitter promptly deleted the interview
ØGoogle
has also been caught red-handed manipulating search results such that Malone’s
Rogan interview won’t show up when searching for “mass formation psychosis”
ØMalone
was permanently banned from Twitter December 29, 2021, likely triggered by a
post that included a video by the Canadian COVID Care Alliance, which reviewed
Pfizer data showing the COVID jab causes more illness than it prevents, and
that the Pfizer trial was flawed both in design and construction
ØAlternatively,
Malone may have been banned due to a post showing how the World Economic Forum
controls the global media narrative
ØA
Physicians Declaration by the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical
Scientists, signed by more than 16,000 doctors and scientists, states that
“healthy children shall not be subjected to forced vaccination” as their
clinical risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection is negligible and long term safety of
the shots cannot be determined prior to such policies being enacted
December 30, 2021, Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Robert Malone,
the inventor of the mRNA gene transfer technology. YouTube and Twitter promptly
deleted the interview and mainstream media published a rash of articles
attacking Malone and Rogan in the most disparaging terms possible.1
In addition to censoring Malone, Google has also been caught
red-handed manipulating search results such that Malone’s Rogan interview won’t
show up when searching for “mass formation psychosis.”2 That
search term also won’t give you any of the interviews given by psychologist
Mattias Desmet, who was the first to use that term as a diagnosis for why so
many are buying an obviously flawed, if not ridiculous, COVID narrative.
In response to the obvious Big Tech censorship, Congressman
Troy Nehls, R-Texas, entered the transcript of the podcast (the Joe Rogan
Experience #17573) into the Congressional Record with the following
statement:4
“By deplatforming Dr. Robert
Malone for voicing opposition and removing the interview, Twitter and YouTube
are once again proving that they don’t work for their users but for big Pharma,
big media, and the elites.
When we stray away from our core
principles of freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of debate,
democracy is lost. Today, I entered the transcript of the Joe Rogan Experience
#1757 into the Congressional Record to preserve the podcast forever. Big Tech
may be able to censor information on their own platforms, but they cannot
censor the Congressional Record.”
Malone Permanently Banned From Twitter
Malone had been permanently banned from Twitter the day
before, December 29, 2021. He suspects his ban was triggered by one of the two
last posts he made. One was a link to the Canadian COVID Care Alliance’s
website,5 with the comment:6
“Pfizer 6 month data which
shows that Pfizer's Covid-19 inoculations cause more illness than they prevent.
Plus, an overview of the Pfizer trial flaws in both design and execution.”
The video, featured on the Canadian COVID Care Alliance’s
website, reviews that Pfizer data. We will feature this excellent video later
and go into far more details of how they exposed the fraud of Pfizer’s clinical
COVID jab trial.
The other tweet that might have triggered the ban was a post
about how the World Economic Forum manages global media in a lockstep fashion.
Either way, Malone was permanently banned from the social media platform either
for highlighting Pfizer’s own science — the very science we’re told to “trust”
— or highlighting the WEF’s central role in the global censorship campaign.
Mainstream Media Are Losing the Information War
Interestingly, Rogan has become something of a key
workaround to the universal mainstream media censorship. While Malone lost
512,000 followers on Twitter when they suspended his account, it’s rumored his
interview with Rogan has garnered some 50 MILLION views across alternative
free-speech platforms.7 As noted in a January 3, 2022,
ZeroHedge article:8
“... nowadays when you make it
on JRE, you’ve officially ‘made it.’ Putting aside the obvious
irony of Twitter attempting to ban somebody and the person in question going
viral as a result, I also thought about how, despite the fact that Malone’s
opinions put him at odds with the mainstream media ... Joe Rogan launched him past the
usual media suspects and into the real ‘mainstream’ ...
[In] 2022, the mainstream media
as we know it today (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc.) is going to be forced to
change its narrative on COVID. The idea of the media being forced to change its
tune on Covid is something I touched upon a couple of days ago when I wrote
about the Omicron variant and how the media is creating a mass hysteria
mountain out of a mole hill.
But after listening to Dr.
Robert Malone’s well reasoned arguments, delivered for three straight hours,
concisely and calmly, it became clear to me that the entire mainstream media
machine could wind up falling at the hands of content creators like Joe Rogan.
Rogan generates so many views
and has grown so quickly — strictly because he allows open
dialogue, civil discourse and approaches things with honest intent ... One
issue for media and political elites to consider is the fact that Rogan has
supporters on both sides of the aisle.
These supporters watch him
because he routinely touches on topics that are considered faux pas or
irreverent ... Rogan has thrived, whether intentionally (bringing on people
specifically because they are being censored) or unintentionally (shooting the
shit with people he finds interesting), from the start, by shining light in the
dark areas that the mainstream media refuses to discuss.”
Many Rogan fans agree that Malone’s interview is among the
best interviews Rogan has ever done. I know, many of you are saying to
yourself, I don’t have three hours to watch this interview. Well, let me
encourage you to find the time. If 50 million people have watched this video,
it is likely you could find the time.
Trust me on this one. You won’t regret it. It is such a pure
joy and pleasure to listen to Malone’s relaxed, eloquent, masterfully precise
language as he destroys the mainstream COVID narrative. You can watch it in
bits and pieces, but this is clearly the best interview Malone has done and is
on par with the Peter McCullough interview with Rogan a few weeks ago.
“If it’s not OK for me to be
part of the conversation ... who can be allowed? ~ Dr. Robert Malone”
As explained by Malone, he has been involved in vaccine
development and distribution for more than three decades, and played a crucial
role in the development of the very technology that the Pfizer and Moderna
COVID shots are based upon, so “If it’s not OK for me to be part of the
conversation ... who can be allowed?” Malone asked.
Indeed, as noted by Rogan, with its ban of Malone, Twitter
basically banned “one of the most qualified people in the world to talk about
vaccines.” Malone said he has attorneys looking at potentially filing some sort
of lawsuit over the ban.
Of course, mainstream media and “fact checkers” (now legally
defined by recent Facebook litigation as opinion promoters) call him a liar for
saying he invented the mRNA technology currently used, but his name on 10
patents proves otherwise.
"No one can dispute that
I played a major role in this tech," Malone said. "And
virtually all other voices that have that background have financial conflicts
of interest. I think I'm the only one that doesn't. I'm not getting any money
out of this."
Some of the cliff notes from Malone’s interview include the
following:11
§Government responses — Malone believes the U.S.
government is “out of control” and “lawless” in their COVID response and that
their actions have resulted in, probably, half a million excess deaths. COVID
jab mandates are “explicitly illegal” as the shots are experimental. What’s
more, people are not getting the information they need to be able to make an
informed decision about the risks they’re taking by participating in this
experiment.
§Social psychology of the times — Malone believes
the irrational behavior we’re witnessing is the result of “mass formation
psychosis,” a societal diagnosis first presented by Desmet at the end of 2021.
§Natural immunity — Natural immunity is more
robust than “vaccine” induced immunity, and people with natural immunity also
have a higher risk of adverse events from the COVID jab.
§COVID jab risks — Malone actually took the
Moderna shot, thinking it might help with some long-COVID symptoms he was
having after getting seriously ill with COVID-19 in February 2020. He says he
suffered some side effects from the shot, but that those effects have since
resolved.
Malone expresses concern about
post-jab myocarditis rates and the possibility of fertility problems. When it
comes to reproductive health, he warns that the lipid nanoparticles in the
COVID shots can have adverse effects on the ovaries.
He also reviews how the SARS-CoV-2
spike protein can cause blood clots, regardless of whether they come from
natural infection or the COVID jab, and how the spike protein can disrupt the
blood-brain-barrier.
Malone believes the reason some
experience no or few adverse effects from the COVID shot has to do with
phenotypic or genetic differences. He points out that diabetics and those with
high blood sugar levels tend to be more affected by spike protein effects, for
example.
§Suppression of early treatment — Early treatment
with drugs such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin is very effective and both
drugs have also been safely administered for several decades. The Chinese
anti-COVID protocol, obtained by Malone in February 2020, actually included
hydroxychloroquine. When he got COVID-19, Malone also self-treated with
femotadine (Pepsid). He’s now leading a clinical trial to assess its usefulness
in the treatment of COVID.
§Narrative management and global coordination of
censorship — The Trusted News Initiative led by the BBC is central to the
censorship campaign, according to Malone. It labels anyone who disagrees with
the official narrative on vaccines as an “anti-vaxxer,” and suppresses anything
that goes against “approved” sources such as Dr. Anthony Fauci and the World
Health Organization.
He also points out that
Thomson-Reuters, which has ties to Pfizer, is a primary fact checker of
Twitter. Since they in part decide what’s allowed to be discussed on Twitter,
Pfizer has this hidden influence as well (not to mention that James C. Smith,
chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, also has been a director at Pfizer
and chair of their compensation committee since 201412).
§COVID jab efficacy — Malone notes the window of
effectiveness is ever shrinking, with some studies, such as one from Denmark,13 showing
negative effectiveness against Omicron.
According to Malone, we’re administering
a “mismatched vaccine” and driving the B and T memory cells toward a virus that
is no longer in circulation. His hypothesis for why the shots stop working so
quickly is because of this original antigenic sin. He explains:
“We've got a new pathogen
[Omicron] but it's got a series of overlaps with the old ones that we've seen
before, and our immune system is biased to respond as if it's the old one.
Now, to make matters worse,
we're taking the spike protein — only one of the proteins the dominant immunologically
dominant protein — and we're jabbing everybody multiple times, and driving
memory cells and effector cells to a virus that is not the one we're
encountering.
So it could very well be
that as you're taking more jabs, you're further skewing your immune response in
a way that's dysfunctional for infection to Omicron ... When you see a signal
this strong, it's saying something's going on you ought to pay attention to it
in my opinion.”
In his first in-person interview
since appearing on Joe Rogan's podcast, Dr. Malone sits down with Kristi Leigh
to discuss the awakening journey, what he thought of Joe Rogan, censorship, the
Great Reset and how he's feeling about 2022.
Malone also sat down with InfoWars reporter Kristi Leigh
within days of his Twitter ban.14 A highlight reel15 from
the 80-minute interview is embedded above. In it, Malone described being
“multidimensionally red-pilled” by the current censorship. He also discusses
his journey of “coming to terms with what the World Economic Forum represents.”
Initially he resisted the idea that there was a global
agenda underway aimed at stripping us of our rights and freedoms. He thought
The Great Reset was fantasy — until he started looking into claims for himself
and found this supposed “conspiracy theory” is fully documented and laid out
for the world to see on the WEF’s own website. “And then you see [the plan]
deployed,” he says.
Malone’s Warning to Parents
In another recent interview with the WND,16 Malone
discussed two grassroots projects that he’s gotten involved with. The first is
the Unity Project, which opposes vaccine mandates, and the second is the
International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists, launched by the
Global COVID Summit.17
Malone also highlighted the second Physicians Declaration18 by
the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists, dated October
29, 2021, in an article for The Defender.19
The declaration has been signed by more than 16,000 doctors
and scientists, and states that “healthy children shall not be subjected to
forced vaccination” as their clinical risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection is
negligible and long term safety of the shots cannot be determined prior to such
policies being enacted.
Not only are children at high risk for severe adverse
events, but having healthy, unvaccinated children in the population is crucial
to achieving herd immunity. The declaration also demands that health agencies
and institutions “cease interfering with physicians treating individual
patients.”
In the article, Malone also warned parents that the decision
to inject their children is "irreversible," and that they need to be
aware of "the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based
on the mRNA vaccine technology I created." Here’s an excerpt from that
written warning:20
“Before you inject your child —
a decision that is irreversible — I wanted to let you know the scientific facts
about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I
created.
There are three issues parents
need to understand: The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your
children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike
proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical
organs, including:
·Their brain and nervous system.
·Their heart and blood vessels, including
blood clots.
·Their reproductive system.
·This
vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system.
The most alarming point about
this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable:
·You can’t fix the lesions within their
brain.
·You can’t repair heart tissue scarring.
·You can’t repair a genetically reset
immune system.
·This
vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of
your family.
The second thing you need to
know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately
tested. We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really
understand the risks. Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed
many years later.”
Again, I urge you to listen to Malone’s interview with Rogan,
embedded at the top of this article, in its entirety. He covers a lot of
ground, and does so in his calm and well-reasoned way. I can confidently assure
you that you won’t have any regrets for making the time investment.
Disclaimer: The
entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola,
unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the
respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this
website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified
health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended
as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of
Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own
health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a
qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking
medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional
before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on
your site please click here. This
content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and
information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from
Dr. Mercola is required.
I actually began examining info a few days ago showing our
government, medicine/science connected to the government and medicine/science
connected to Corporatist/Fascist/Gramsci-style Communists are flagrant liars in
the name of political control rather than a science/medicine that used to rely
on a credo of “DO NO HARM”.
This is the kind of sharing that has essentially barred me on
LinkedIn which probably means my limited presence on Facebook is
destined for social jail. (Too bad about Facebook, it has been my connection
the High School days of the graduating class of 1975.)
This is definitely an anti-tyranny post based on facts the
liars mislead their listeners with the false accusation of Conspiracy Theory
and misinformation.
I am convinced many have already watched the Project
Veritas exposé videos showing the FDA to be more the Left-Wing control
politics than the science of helping people. NEVERTHELESS, I am cross posting
them. I am a bit surprised hasn’t censored this COVID tyranny and kind of still
expect it to happen. (H/T: Social Media platform Slug
Group COVID-19):
Mission Statement Investigate &
expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct
in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical
& transparent society.
Core Values MORAL COURAGE - Courage
is the virtue that sustains all others. We choose to overcome our fears.
WE ARE ALL LEADERS - Turning people
into leaders. Completed staff work. Ownership.
COLLABORATION - Best not to work in
silos. No one individual is as smart as all of us.
RESILIENCE - Persistence and
determination alone are omnipotent. Never, ever, ever give up. We don't let
mistakes or setbacks discourage us. Pursue perfection, knowing full well you
will never attain it.
I grew up in a time when Americans were taught to place
their trust in doctors, scientists and the government agencies that employed
them because we were led to believe medicine/science put human life above
political agendas. For me that trust began to erode LONG AGO.
Another nail in the coffin of trust is an agency known as Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
The acronym has been the stuff of Conspiracy Theory and Science Fiction for
decades – DARPA. The DARPA about page
is one of those cryptic read-between-the-lines that might sound good for
America but a bit cringe-worthy to those who have even an inkling of DARPA
awareness – an excerpt:
For sixty years, DARPA has held to
a singular and enduring mission: to make pivotal investments in breakthrough
technologies for national security.
The genesis of that mission and of
DARPA itself dates to the launch of Sputnik in 1957, and a commitment by the
United States that, from that time forward, it would be the initiator and not
the victim of strategic technological surprises. Working with innovators inside
and outside of government, DARPA has repeatedly delivered on that mission, transforming
revolutionary concepts and even seeming impossibilities into practical
capabilities. The ultimate results have included not only game-changing
military capabilities such as precision weapons and stealth technology, but
also such icons of modern civilian society such as the Internet, automated
voice recognition and language translation, and Global Positioning System
receivers small enough to embed in myriad consumer devices.
DARPA explicitly reaches for
transformational change instead of incremental advances. But it does not
perform its engineering alchemy in isolation. It works within an innovation
ecosystem that includes academic, corporate and governmental partners, with a constant
focus on the Nation’s military Services, which work with DARPA to create
new strategic opportunities and novel tactical options. For decades,
this vibrant, interlocking ecosystem of diverse collaborators has proven to be
a nurturing environment for the intense creativity that DARPA is designed to
cultivate.
DARPA comprises approximately 220
government employees in six technical offices, including nearly 100 program
managers, who together oversee about 250 research and development programs.
DARPA goes to great lengths to
identify, recruit and support excellent program managers—extraordinary
individuals who are at the top of their fields and are hungry for the
opportunity to push the limits of their disciplines. These leaders, who are
at the very heart of DARPA’s history of success, come from academia, industry
and government agencies for limited stints, generally three to five years. That
deadline fuels the signature DARPA urgency to achieve success in less time than
might be considered reasonable in a conventional setting.
Program managers address
challenges broadly, spanning the spectrum from deep science to systems to
capabilities, but ultimately they are driven by the desire to make a
difference. They define their programs, set milestones, meet with their
performers and … AND YUP, THERE IS MORE TO READ
(Bold emphasis by Blog Editor)
Now some DARPA info that focuses more on the current
Globalist/Leftist control of humanity from medical doctor Dr. Eddy Bettermann
(yup an MD meaning science oriented). Here an excerpt:
BOMBSHELL: DARPA was secretly
developing the mRNA vaccine years ago through Moderna, and they seek permanent
control over your body and bloodline
Prior to the worldwide lockdowns in
2020, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) were surreptitiously working on a new mRNA vaccine platform using a new biotech company called
Moderna. Their strategic planning began in 2013, when DARPA funds were used by
Moderna to invent methods for inducing a short-lived immune response through
administration of mRNA vaccines.
The inventor of the mRNA platform,
Dr. Robert Malone, reveals that “Moderna was essentially founded by DARPA.” Millions
of dollars in DARPA grants built the vaccine program, through patents handed
down to Moderna. However, Moderna refuses to disclose these DARPA awards in the
patent applications that they filed for the new vaccine technology.
DARPA is behind the mRNA spike
protein experiment, with help from the NIH
As this secretive DARPA project comes to light, it
becomes apparent that nefarious forces within the US government were planning
to unleash this technology for years prior to a “public health emergency.” To
achieve compliance, they only needed to exploit human psychology, suspend the
rule of law, and threaten people’s livelihoods to coerce the population to
enter into this experiment and alter the natural physiology of their cells and
biological functions. A director at the NIH, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made sure of
that when he called for a nationwide lock down in March of 2020. Carrying out
the plan, Fauci is now calling for mandatory injections of this genocidal
operating software.
Now for a series of cross posts largely from those who have
made science their life AND had high reputations until their science
contradicted the science of nefarious liars.
JRH 9/27/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via - credit cards, check
cards
A document signed by more than 3,000 doctors and scientists
internationally that accuses COVID policy makers of “crimes against humanity”
due to preventing physicians from providing life-saving treatments for their
patients, as well as suppressing open scientific debate surrounding not only
COVID but treatments has been produced.
Those involved have stated that a “one size fits all”
treatment have only resulted in people not only getting sick, but needlessly
dying.
These scientists and doctors met in Rome, Italy earlier this
month for the Global
Covid Summit.
During the three day summit, those in attendance shared
experiences, compared studies and the efficacy of treatments they have had
success with, as well as criticizing those limiting their ability to treat
patients.
We the physicians of the world, united and loyal to the
Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the profession of medicine as we know it is at a
crossroad, are compelled to declare the following;
WHEREAS, it is our utmost responsibility
and duty to uphold and restore the dignity, integrity, art and science of
medicine;
WHEREAS, there is an unprecedented assault
on our ability to care for our patients;
WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen
to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless
illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the
individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be
safe and more effective;
WHEREAS, physicians and other health care
providers working on the front lines, utilizing their knowledge of
epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, are often first to identify
new, potentially life saving treatments;
WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being
discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of
ideas about new and emerging diseases, not only endangering the essence of the
medical profession, but more importantly, more tragically, the lives of our
patients;
WHEREAS, thousands of physicians are being
prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers
put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast
majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face
of disease. Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home
(allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens,
resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to
failure-to-treat;
WHEREAS, this is not medicine. This is not
care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:
RESOLVED, that the physician-patient
relationship must be restored. The very heart of medicine is this relationship,
which allows physicians to best understand their patients and their illnesses,
to formulate treatments that give the best chance for success, while the
patient is an active participant in their care.
RESOLVED, that the political intrusion into
the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end.
Physicians, and all health care providers, must be free to practice the art and
science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or
disciplinary action, including possible loss of licensure and hospital
privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government
entities and organizations – which further prevent us from caring for patients
in need. More than ever, the right and ability to exchange objective scientific
findings, which further our understanding of disease, must be protected.
RESOLVED, that physicians must defend their
right to prescribe treatment, observing the tenet FIRST, DO NO HARM. Physicians
shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. These
restrictions continue to cause unnecessary sickness and death. The rights of
patients, after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of each
option, must be restored to receive those treatments.
RESOLVED, that we invite physicians of the
world and all health care providers to join us in this noble cause as we
endeavor to restore trust, integrity and professionalism to the practice of
medicine.
RESOLVED, that we invite the scientists of
the world, who are skilled in biomedical research and uphold the highest
ethical and moral standards, to insist on their ability to conduct and publish
objective, empirical research without fear of reprisal upon their careers,
reputations and livelihoods.
RESOLVED, that we invite patients, who believe
in the importance of the physician-patient relationship and the ability to be
active participants in their care, to demand access to science-based medical
care.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
signed this Declaration as of the date first written.
…
So far, as of 11am EST on Saturday, September 25, 2021,
3,500 doctors and scientists from around the world have signed on to this
declaration. Let’s see if this adds weight to bring these criminals to justice,
and far more justice to far more people than they did at Nuremberg.
We get a lot of
e-mails and private messages along these lines “do you have a source
for X?” or “can you point me to mask studies?” or “I
know I saw a graph for mortality, but I can’t find it anymore”. And we
understand, it’s been a long 18 months, and there are so many statistics and
numbers to try and keep straight in your head.
So, to deal with all these requests, we decided to make a
bullet-pointed and sourced list for all the key points. A one-stop-shop.
Here are key facts and sources about the alleged “pandemic”,
that will help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January
2020, and help you enlighten any of your friends who might be still trapped in
the New Normal fog (click links to skip):
ØThe
COVID-19 shots are waking people up to vaccine myths, such as the idea that
vaccination always prevents infection and transmission, and is the only way to
achieve herd immunity. The truth is that many vaccines don’t prevent infection
or transmission, and vaccine-acquired immunity is typically temporary.
Sometimes you don't get it at all
ØOver
the past 18 months, the number of people asking questions about vaccine safety
has grown significantly. The subscriber base to the National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC)’s The Vaccine Reaction journal newspaper has
increased by more than 50%
ØAfter
9/11, Congress and the pharmaceutical industry got together and passed
BioShield legislation that expands liability protection for drug companies
marketing pandemic drugs and vaccines in the U.S.
ØThe
PREP Act’s Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) is so inadequate,
if you’re injured by a drug or vaccine used under a public health emergency
declaration, it’s nearly impossible to receive compensation
ØHealth authorities and government officials
have proven their incompetence during this pandemic. From the beginning, they
neglected and actually prevented safe and effective treatments from being
widely used — a decision that has resulted in unnecessary deaths and needless
suffering
This week, we celebrate our 12th anniversary of Vaccine
Awareness Week. In this video, Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of
the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) — which will celebrate its 40th
anniversary as an organization in April 2022 — summarizes some of the high and
low points we've experienced over the past year.
"It's really kind of
surreal for me to watch what has unfolded since the winter of 2020," Fisher
says. "In the 1990s, I predicted that the day would come when we
would not be able to function in society unless we had received every
government recommended vaccine.
I didn't exactly understand
how they would get there. Well, now we know how they got there, and it's like
living my worst nightmare, which I thought my children and grandchildren would
be grappling with after I was long gone. Instead, I'm here to witness it and
it's very disturbing.
But within this difficult
challenge, we also have opportunity, because I truly think that what they've
done has completely changed the public's view of public health officials and of
public health policy in general. And I don't think they're going to recover —
perhaps ever — but certainly not for a long, long time.
The perception is that the
public has not been told the whole truth about how this virus came about, and
about the way in which they [need to] handle it.
Certainly, if you look at it,
you see that psychological warfare has been used to create such fear and
anxiety in the minds of so many people that they were willing to give up
fundamental civil liberties in order to feel safe, [but it's] an illusion of
safety … I think they have overreached, because they are zealots in saying that
everyone should get all these vaccines in order to keep the public safe."
Growing Understanding of Vaccine Dangers
According to Fisher, polls show two-thirds of Americans do
not want COVID shot mandates.1 They do not want to be required
to show a vaccine passport in order to participate in society, enter a
restaurant or a store, hold a job or go to college.2 "There
is definitely not an appetite in this country for mandatory use of this
COVID-19 vaccine," Fisher says.
“[People are] starting to
understand that vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission. The entire
mandatory vaccination system has been built on the myth that if you get
vaccinated, you cannot get infected and transmit the infection to other people.
The truth is that vaccine-acquired immunity is often very temporary and
sometimes you don't get it at all. ~ Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC”
An estimated 25% to 30% of health care workers and medical
doctors are even refusing the COVID shot.3 As noted by Fisher,
"That's quite significant, considering they're the ones who have been
taking care of these [COVID] patients in hospitals." Importantly, over the
past 18 months, the number of people asking questions about vaccine safety has
grown significantly.
"We've been talking about
these issues — vaccine ineffectiveness, leaky vaccines, as well as vaccine
safety issues — for nearly 40 years," Fisher says. "So,
these issues aren't just relevant for COVID. I'm hoping that this conversation
is going to widen to taking a critical look at the entire mass vaccination
system that is the centerpiece of public health policies around the
world."
In the early 1980s, when the NVIC first started, there was
no information at all for the public about vaccine risks. Doctors never
discussed it, so parents knew nothing. Of course, doctors were not educated on
vaccine risks either, so the ignorance was spread equally among medical
professionals and lay people. Awareness about dangers has increased more or
less in tandem with the expansion of the childhood vaccination schedule.
"When I came into this
work, it was seven vaccines we were giving our children," Fisher says.
"Tetanus, the DPT shot, measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) and oral polio
vaccine. That was it. That's all the children got."
Today, children receive 72 doses of 16 different vaccines by
the age of 18. The catalyst for the explosion of added vaccines in the early
1990s was the partial liability protection Congress gave vaccine manufacturers
in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
The movie, "1986: The Act," released in 2020
explains how the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) came
about, and the ramifications of it. Fisher, who is featured prominently in the
film, explains:
"That law was passed in
November of 1986. I and other parents of DPT vaccine injured children worked on
that law with Congress. They basically told us they were going to protect these
companies from liability. We could either come to the table and argue for what
we thought the children should get, or not come to the table, but they were
going to pass the law.
We came to the table and did the
best we could. We were just a young group of parents against the pharmaceutical
industry, the medical industry and the government, that all wanted to take
total liability away from these manufacturers and the doctors.
We managed to get that law to
not protect the doctors. When that law was passed, the doctors were still
liable for medical malpractice when it came to vaccines harming a child. The
companies were also still liable for design defect. What they got off on was
failure to warn.
This is what people just don't
understand. They [the vaccine manufacturers] were still liable
in a civil court of law. And what did [Congress] do? In
December 1987, in the dead of the night, an amendment was added to an omnibus
budget bill … that completely let all the doctors and vaccine providers off the
hook in a civil court of law.
In hearings in 1987, companies
begged Congress to give them full liability protection and Congress wouldn't do
it. They only gave the doctors full liability protection.4
Our unique contribution to that
law was the safety provisions: informing, recording, reporting safety
provisions. VAERS is the result of what we did in insisting that there be a
centralized vaccine adverse event reporting system that parents and the public
could report to, as well as the doctors.
This is a one-of-a-kind vaccine
adverse event reporting system [VAERS], and why we know today that more than
half a million COVID vaccine reactions have been reported by the public, by
doctors around this country and in other countries that use the Pfizer, Moderna
and the Johnson & Johnson vaccines.
There've been more than [13,600
deaths following COVID vaccination as of August 20, 2021, and more than 55,820
post-COVID shot hospitalizations5] reported to that system."
The Destruction of the NCVIA
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 also
requires doctors to provide parents with written vaccine information before their
children are vaccinated. Originally, these information statements were thick
booklets full of information. But after the law was passed, the Department of
Health and Human Services gutted the vaccine safety provisions, reducing that
vaccine information statement down to a single sheet of paper.
"They took out a lot of
information that should be given to parents," Fisher says. "They
gutted the compensation provisions. So, today, almost no child qualifies for
compensation under that law. I guess what I'm trying to say is, what the law
was when it was passed is not anything like the law we see today."
Then, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Wyeth in a
DTP vaccine injury case (Bruesewitz v Wyeth6) in which the
prosecutor argued the vaccine injury was the result of a design defect (failure
to make a product safer). Wyeth could have made the DPT vaccine safer, and they
didn't do it. The Supreme Court majority claimed the legislative history was
clear — that Congress intended that vaccine manufacturers should have no
liability for FDA licensed and CDC recommended vaccines.
This was in fact the complete opposite of what the
legislative history shows. Two of the Supreme Court judges, Justices Ruth Bader
Ginsberg and Sonia Sotomayor, wrote a brilliant dissent, stating that the
legislative history does not show that Congress wanted to give the companies complete
liability protection.7
The film, "1986: The Act," dispels the myths
surrounding this law, clearing up the many confusions about what the law was
initially intended to accomplish. Unfortunately, the misinterpretation and
gutting of the NCVIA opened the proverbial flood gates to more vaccines being
mandated for children.
"There's not been one
vaccine that has been created by the pharmaceutical industry and endorsed by
government that has not eventually been mandated," Fisher says.
"And what they're trying to
do during this pandemic is set the stage for every adult to also be required to
get every government-endorsed vaccine. It is a public/private partnership
between the pharmaceutical industry and government, and it's dangerous.
When I came into this work,
there was somewhat of a firewall between the pharmaceutical industry and
government. They're now one and the same, and Pharma calls the shots at the
FDA, the NIH and the CDC. That's just the plain truth of it."
The PREP Act
While the U.S. Supreme Court granted vaccine makers blanket
immunity for childhood vaccine-related injuries by the Supreme Court in 2011,
the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act passed by Congress
in December 20058 added yet another layer of liability
protection for the industry. After 9/11, Congress and the pharmaceutical
industry got together and passed BioShield legislation.
This federal legislation was based on the idea that weapons
of mass destruction could be used against the United States, necessitating
protective legislation to respond to "pandemic or bio-terrorism
emergencies." Of course, the weapons of mass destruction were never
actually found but, still, Congress in partnership with the pharmaceutical
industry passed BioShield legislation. The PREP Act is part of that
legislation.
The PREP Act has to do with declared public health
emergencies such as pandemics, and includes a separate mechanism for
compensation when the injury occurs from a pandemic-related medication or
vaccine. The PREP Act compensation mechanism was reconfirmed by Congress in the
spring of 2020, and again in March 2021,9 in regard to
COVID-19.
While the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Act-related
compensation mechanism has been fatally compromised with Congressional
amendments and federal agency rule making over the years, the Countermeasures
Injury Compensation Program (CICP) under the PREP Act is even worse. It's so
bad, if you're injured by a vaccine used under a public health emergency
declaration, there's virtually no hope of compensation.
Imagine surrendering to all the pressure of losing your job
and getting the jab, only to get so sick you generate over $1 million in
hospital bills. It sounds outrageous, but this has in fact happened to many.
They have zero recourse and in most cases have to declare bankruptcy, while the
vaccine companies can continue to ravage the public treasuries without ANY
liability or responsibility. It's beyond reprehensibly criminal, but they are
getting away with it.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book, "The Real Tony
Fauci," which comes out in November 2021, goes into far greater detail as
to just how this BioShield legislation is really nothing more than a gaming of
the system, essentially allowing drug companies to capture hundreds of billions
of dollars from the federal government, (really you, the taxpayer). It's all a
massive money and power grab.
Fauci himself, who is definitely one of the cores of this
whole nightmare, is responsible for having allocated probably over $1 trillion
in federal funding to researchers, principal investigators that are intimately
and ultimately tied to pharma, over the 37 years he's presided as director of
the NIAID. His budget for fiscal year 2021 alone is $6.5 billion.10 The
patents they created generates royalties to them. It's a nightmare dystopia of
raping the public from the federal treasury.
'Colossal Mismanagement of a Pandemic'
From the beginning, health authorities have been neglectful
when it comes to the treatment of COVID-19. They've even actively prevented
safe and effective treatments from being used. In the interview, Fisher
describes her own experience with COVID-19:
"I had COVID in December of
2019. I had a fairly difficult course with it for 10 weeks into the end of
February of 2020. Of course, I didn't know what I had, but it was not a fun
experience, and I was left with long-COVID that lasted 16 months until a
functional medicine doctor who tested me found that the COVID had reactivated a
[latent] Epstein-Barr infection.
She prescribed a short course of
appropriately dosed ivermectin, and I had an amazing reduction in my symptoms,
which included cardiac symptoms that had been diagnosed by a cardiologist. So,
I had all the classic symptoms of COVID and I had a classic course of
long-COVID, yet I didn't know that I could have used ivermectin months ago to
help me get through.
My energy shot up after that
ivermectin and I stopped having to sleep 12 hours a day. My cardiac symptoms
were significantly reduced. It was like I got my life back. Yet the government
has gone after doctors who have urged people to get vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc,
ivermectin11 and these other licensed drugs that are safe and
have been around forever.
The government actively
discouraged people from doing things that could have helped them recover. This
is so wrong on so many levels. It's a colossal mismanagement of an
outbreak."
Of course, there are indications that it wasn't really
inadvertent mismanagement but, rather, a strategic and carefully orchestrated
plan to implement the Great Reset.
"A couple of months ago, I
went to the website of the World Economic Forum and what comes up? The Great
Reset.12 I could not believe what I was reading. It's
completely transparent, how they want to reset the entire world's
economy," Fisher says.
The ultimate "public health authority" is of
course the World Health Organization, and the No. 1 funder of the WHO is Bill
Gates, as he provides funding not only through the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation but also GAVI.
This financial leverage gives Gates a disproportionate
amount of power over public health globally and, of course, we know that his
primary goal is to expand the use of vaccines. At the same time, Gates is also
a major Big Tech player, which is the central enforcer of censorship. By
censoring one side of the discussion, Big Tech is responsible for making
informed consent impossible.
Growing Awareness That Vaccines Don't Prevent Infection
The good news is that the COVID situation is waking people
up not only to the potential dangers of these novel mRNA injections, but also
to the problems and fallacies associated with all the conventional vaccines.
They are starting to recognize these injections are not as harmless or as
effective as they have been purported to be. That is one of the silver linings
of this entire mess.
"[People are] starting to
understand that vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission," Fisher
says. "The entire mandatory vaccination system in this country has
been built on the myth that if you get vaccinated, you cannot get infected and
transmit the infection to other people; that you have vaccine-acquired immunity
that is robust and contributes to herd immunity.
The truth is that
vaccine-acquired immunity is often very temporary and sometimes you don't get
it at all. And really, herd immunity is more based on natural immunity … So,
the term 'immunization' really should never be used anymore.
These COVID 'vaccines,' the
government has now acknowledged, cannot reliably prevent infection and
transmission.13 This is a game-changer, if people will really
get their arms around it. And so, I am glad that has come out. I'm also glad
that we're seeing people around the world stand up and fight for their
freedom."
The Fight for Medical Autonomy and Freedom
Since the start of the COVID pandemic, the NVIC has
encouraged people to work within the system, to go to your state legislators
and have personal conversations with them. NVIC created model state legislation
at the beginning of this pandemic, because they knew the end game would be
mandatory COVID vaccination.
So far, 21 U.S. states have passed legislation that restrict
or prevent COVID vaccine mandates or COVID vaccine passports. Several state
governors have also issued executive orders to the same effect. These successes
show us that we should not lose complete faith in the system just yet. It's
broken, yes, but the answer is not to give up but, rather, to get personally
involved. We need freedom-loving, rational people to get involved at every
level of government, Fisher says:
"That means your school
board, your county boards, city councils, your state legislatures. At the local
level, you can really make a difference. Talk to your neighbors, talk to your
community, give them the information that's produced by NVIC and by
mercola.com.
Give them factual information
backed up with references, and try to change the conversation in your
community. Also, we have to change bad laws so that we won't have to feel this
oppression that we've felt for almost two years …
I'll just point out, there's a
page on the CDC website that basically talks about quarantine camps14 and
being able to detain citizens should they feel that they need to be protected
from the rest of society, or the rest of society protected from them. This is a
very serious constitutional issue."
As explained by Fisher, the federal government could also
invoke its authority over interstate commerce and prohibit unvaccinated people
from flying from one state to another that way. There's already legislation
introduced in Congress proposing this.15 So, even though 21
states have enacted laws against the requirement of vaccine passports, we're
not out of the woods yet. The freedom to travel can still be stripped from us
in a variety of ways, and we must fight to block all of them.
FDA's Approval of the Pfizer COVID Shot
August 23, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
granted full approval16 to the COVID-19 mRNA injection
developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, sold under the brand name Comirnaty, for use in
people aged 16 and older. It's the fastest approval in history,17 and
is based on just six months' worth of data from 44,060 people.18,19
Half of them got the shots and half initially received a
placebo. However, in the second week of December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the
control group and 93% of controls opted to get the real injection20 rather
than remain in the control group for the remainder of the trial, which is
slated to continue for another two years. In other words, there's no control
group left against which to compare side effects and effectiveness.
The FDA was expected to hold a public meeting of the
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC)21 and
allow for public and expert input before the first COVID-19 vaccine was
formally licensed.
For transparency and full public disclosure of vital
scientific information, this meeting should have taken place before approval
because COVID-19 vaccines are the first to ever have been distributed to the US
population under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
In response, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Children's Health
Defense (CHD) filed a lawsuit22 August 31, 2021, against
the FDA and its acting director, Dr. Janet Woodcock, for this mess. On its
website, CHD says:
"CHD argues that the
licensure was a classic 'bait and switch,' allowing Pfizer,
the Biden administration, the U.S. military and employers to exhort people to
take 'licensed' vaccines when in fact the vaccines available and being
administered continued to be the Pfizer-BioNTech Emergency
Use Authorization (EUA) vaccines …
… the FDA violated federal law
when it simultaneously licensed Pfizer's 'Comirnaty' vaccine and extended
Pfizer's EUA for its vaccine that has the 'same formulation' and that 'can be
used interchangeably …
The law (21 U.S. Code §
360bbb-3-(3)) on 'authorization for medical products for use in emergencies'
requires the EUA designation be used only when 'there is no adequate, approved
and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing or treating
such disease or condition.'
The lawsuit alleges once the FDA
approved and licensed Pfizer's Comirnaty vaccine, there was no further basis
for the FDA to preserve the EUA status for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine
that Pfizer acknowledges has the 'same formulation'
and is 'interchangeable.'"
As explained by Fisher, in order to receive Emergency Use
Authorization from the FDA, vaccine makers had to show their COVID jabs were
more than 50% effective at preventing serious symptoms of COVID-19 disease.23 They
were not required to demonstrate that the shots prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection or
that it prevents transmission of the virus.
"So the bar was set very
low at the very beginning for the Emergency Use Authorization," she
says. "If you look at the rhetoric the CDC uses, you can see
they're always talking about prevention of hospitalization and death. This is
not what people think happens when you get a vaccine. We have been carefully
taught to believe that when we get vaccinated, we will not get infected and we
won't transmit that infection to other people."
Many Vaccines Don't Prevent Infection or Transmission
The problem is, many vaccines don't work the way we've been
told. Take the pertussis vaccine, for example. According to Fisher, there's
ample evidence that you can be vaccinated against pertussis and still transmit
the infection, including asymptomatically.24,25 The same thing
has been shown for measles,26 mumps,27 influenza28 and
chickenpox29 vaccines.
"That's why I said that
this is an opportunity to educate people about what vaccination really
means," Fisher says. "It's also an argument for why
[COVID] vaccines should not be mandated.
In this case, it's a biological
pharmaceutical product that has never been made like this. This is an entirely
new technology.30 It is truly an experiment on the human race,
because they did not do the kind of science that they should have done to get
Emergency Use Authorization."
Dr. Peter McCullough, an epidemiologist and cardiologist who
is very familiar with medical research protocols, has pointed out that none of
the COVID injection trials has data safety monitoring boards. It appears
standard safeguards were intentionally eliminated for the rapid rollout of
these shots and to eliminate any public outcry because the incriminating data
are simply not being collected.
How convenient. Actually, it is a clever strategy to achieve
their goals and they are getting away with it, because those in authority do
not have the courage and boldness of physician scientists like McCullough and
Dr. Robert Malone, who invented the mRNA technology.31 We need
10 times more of these types of brave souls to stick their necks out, as they
have the credibility to actually make a difference. We just need enough of them
to take a stand.
Had proper monitoring boards been in place, McCullough
believes the vaccination campaign would have been stopped by late January 2021,
because of the high number of suspicious deaths that had occurred by then.
There's also the possibility of these shots causing antibody dependent
enhancement (ADE), which is a big concern for the future.
"This year, so many people
have been contacting us. We have a counseling service and we help people,
families, who are going through a vaccine reaction or who are asking for
information … Our weekly Vaccine Reaction newsletter has seen an almost 50%
increase in subscribers, and this shows you that people are thirsty for this
information.
One of the things we're really
excited about is we're going to be launching a brand-new website in 2022 that
your donations helped us do. It's a very expensive project, but something that
I'm very excited about. We're also going to be launching an updated NVIC portal
website.
We have been putting an awful
lot of our efforts into the states, trying to educate people and train them on
how to be effective vaccine choice advocates in their state. This takes a lot
of organizing, and it takes a lot of collaboration between other groups that
are on the front lines in the states.
We wouldn't be here if it hadn't
been for the support that you [Dr. Mercola] have given us over
the years. And I feel positive; I feel that the people in this country are
going to remember that freedom is something they have to fight for. It's taken
us a little bit of time to come out of our shock, because they punched us
around pretty good in 2020, but I think people are waking up now and are going
to start to really fight back …
Those who are authoritarian —
forced vaccinators — have revealed themselves in the last 18 months. And that
reveal has caused people to take a step back and look to see what their real
goal is."
Take Action, Support NVIC Today
As in previous years, during Vaccine Awareness Week, I will
match your donations to the NVIC, dollar for dollar, so this is a great time to
maximize your impact. So, please, consider making a tax-deductible donation to
the NVIC today, and be sure to sign
up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal to stay abreast of the latest
legislative activities in your state.
Help Support Vaccine Awareness Week
The Twelfth Annual Vaccine Awareness Week from September 26
to October 2, 2021, will feature important information about vaccine science,
policy and law that you can share with your family and friends.
With every donation you make during Vaccine Awareness Week,
you can help support the legal right to make an informed, voluntary decision
about vaccinations. During this week, I'll match your donations up to $100,000
to the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a nonprofit charity
advocating for vaccine safety and informed consent rights since 1982.
With aggressive efforts by government working with
pharmaceutical corporations and medical trade groups to mandate COVID-19
vaccines and partnering with Silicon Valley and corporate media to censor
public conversations about vaccination and health, it is critical for you to
act now to protect your legal right to make informed, voluntary vaccine
choices.
Thankfully, the nonprofit National Vaccine Information
Center (NVIC) provides the public with independent,
well-referenced information on vaccines and advocates for the inclusion of
vaccine safety and informed consent protections in the public health system.
Last year, NVIC sponsored the ground-breaking Fifth
International Public Conference on Vaccination: Protecting Health &
Autonomy in the 21st Century.
The conference featured 51 speakers from around the world
talking about the coronavirus pandemic and defending liberty in late 2020, just
before the government granted vaccine manufacturers an Emergency Use
Authorization (EUA) to distribute experimental COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S.
You can watch or listen to the conference for free here.
Resources Where You Can Learn More
NVIC Advocacy Portal — Become a registered
user of this unique free online communications network that electronically
connects you directly with your own legislators and emails you action alerts
with talking points so you can be an effective vaccine choice advocate in your
state.
You can use it to inform your legislators about why it is necessary to protect
vaccine exemptions and your legal right to make voluntary vaccine decisions for
yourself and your children.
Ask
8 Vaccine Information Kiosk — Download brochures and reports
on vaccination and how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms, as well as
posters and web badges that you can share with your family and friends. Access
the illustrated and fully referenced “Guide to Reforming Vaccine Policy &
Law” to educate your legislator when you advocate for vaccine informed consent
rights.
Vaccine
Reaction Reporting— Search for and read descriptions of
vaccine reaction reports made to the federal vaccine adverse events reporting
system (VAERS). Make a vaccine reaction report to NVIC.
Cry for Vaccine Freedom Wall — Read real life
stories from people who have been threatened, bullied and sanctioned for trying
to make voluntary decisions about vaccination for themselves or their minor
children. Post your own experience.
Guide to Flu & Flu Vaccines— This “Mini
Guide to influenza & Flu Vaccines” is a brief summary of facts about
influenza and influenza vaccines.
Disclaimer: The
entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola,
unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the
respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this
website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified
health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended
as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr.
Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health
care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified
health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or
have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using
products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on
your site please click here. This
content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and
information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from
Dr. Mercola is required.
