DONATE

Showing posts with label Originalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Originalism. Show all posts

Monday, September 28, 2020

Stand Firm Against Officials Dangerous to Liberty

You will notice Justin submitted this post a couple of days ago. I am an anti-masker and in saying so Justin’s submission points out mask mandates very simply shred Liberty in the Constitution and Natural Rights the Constitution is supposed to protect. There is  NO conclusive evidence a mask protects anyone from COVID or any virus for that matter. The hypocrites in the CDC, NIH and Surgeon General have waffled so much on mask efficacy giving despotic control to Dem-controlled regions that their claims of science is ridiculous.


JRH 9/28/20
Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit, check 
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 
OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.
*****************************
Stand Firm Against Officials Dangerous to Liberty
A Man's Natural Rights Are His Own To Live Free

By Justin O. Smith
Sent 9/26/2020 12:37 AM

"A man's natural rights are his own, against the whole world; and any infringement of them is equally a crime, whether committed by one man, or by millions; whether committed by one man, calling himself a robber, ... or by millions, calling themselves a government."  ~ Lysander Spooner [Blog Editor: In the realm of politics and philosophy Spooner is a bit of an enigmatic figure in my opinion. The brief readings I found all seem to agree on one particular character, specifically the descriptor of Anarchist. For me Spooner’s enigma is his support and contradiction of the use of violence to achieve ends. For history buffs you can form your opinion: Wikipedia, FEE, Mises Institute and Ammo.com]

All people desire to live free and have the ability to exercise their individual liberty in a free society, especially here in America, where until recently, our nation has had a long history of preserving and defending all manner of freedoms for all our people. But today we consistently see one despotic case after another of the people's basic personal freedom and individual liberty violated by some ill-informed "public servant" or police officer carrying out an illiberal and despotic "order" emanating from some governor's or mayor's office, these petty tyrants, enforcing unreasonable, high-handed "policies", that have no real basis in any law.

Take a look at what the Constitution actually states in plain language and read it through the prism of the Original Intent of the Founders, and a person finds that any such power taken for granted as the authority of the government doesn't exist anywhere within this document. The government cannot infringe upon Our personal freedoms, willy-nilly, regardless of any plandemic or emergency, no matter the vast number of excuses and flawed or outright erroneous science they offer as justification.

In recent days, America, the good Americans, watched in deep dismay, concern, and a great deal of anger, as five men and women were arrested in Idaho for worshiping at an outdoor church service without a mask, in Moscow, Idaho. This was considered a violation of the mayor's and City Council's draconian and arbitrary order that extends a mask mandate to January 2021, even though there no longer remains any real health emergency surrounding "the Virus", that has proven much less severe and deadly than projections. 

How many times will these mask mandates be extended? What happens in 2021 in Moscow, Idaho? Another extension into 2030? 2050?

On September 23rd in Logan Ohio, Alecia Kitts had made an hour and a half drive to see her son play in a ball game, where she sat with family members the required six feet distance away from other groups. It wasn't long before she was approached by a policeman who noticed she wasn't wearing a mask. She initially objected and stated correctly that she had done nothing wrong, and it was at that point that this small young lady was manhandled, tasered and arrested, like some thug criminal would be, for "non-compliance" with "the rule" and the governor's mask mandate, when in actuality, as written, she was absolutely in compliance for outdoors, and in light of her own asthmatic condition.


[Posted by The Timmyz
349 subscribers - Sep 23, 2020

Only in LOGAN OHIO does a person get TASED AND ARRESTED as a result of not wearing a freaking MASK

❌To use this video in a commercial player or in broadcasts, please email licensing@storyful.com❌]

But regardless of how it's written or who complies or doesn't comply with it, the [Governor Mike DeWine] [JOS]order's premise is flawed and illegal on its face and should never have been given any ground or legitimacy whatsoever, from the start. 

One witness can be heard on a video of the incident exclaiming in disgust, "Tasing this lady over not wearing a damn mask."

So, this is what good Americans are handed, after they initially went along with a "temporary" lockdown measure aimed at "flattening the curve". Well, the damned curve has long been flattened and its past time to end this insane arbitrary tyrannical use of police powers and force against regular, peaceful citizens just trying to go about their everyday life, as best they can. 

I see a massive lawsuit on the behalf of Ms. Alecia Kitts against the Logan Police Department and Marietta City School System on the horizon, in the near future. 

And I can hear the cop saying, "I was just following orders." Isn't that what the Nazi SS, such as Adolf Eichmann, said at their Nuremburg Trials? Hhmmmm ... I wonder where that goes? 

Fortunately, here in my home county (Rutherford County, TN), Mayor Bill Ketron issued a statement acknowledging the end of his mask mandate on September 22nd 2020, not that I was too concerned. I haven't worn a mask since the first day the mandate was issued, and just like Ms. Kitts, I would have resisted any attempt to arrest me for non-compliance; I probably would have kicked the officer's fat ass down the steps, if I could, simply on principle, no matter the price I would pay afterward.

Too many people say, "Oh, it's just a mask. It's just being 'respectful' to others. What's the harm in just wearing it to make others feel better?" No. It's not just a mask and I'm not concerned with anyone's feelings. These mask mandates are strictly about control and a blatant, overt act of tyranny from any government entity forcing them upon the people. 

Making an observation on the lockdowns on September 16th, U.S. Attorney General William Barr noted: "You know, putting a national lockdown, stay-at-home orders, is like house arrest. It's -- you know -- other than slavery, which was a different kind of restraint, this is the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in American history." 

Numerous lawsuits have grown from the abuses of power America is experiencing across our land, and while many activist, Marxist judges or judges who simply don't understand the Constitution -- probably bottom tier graduates of their respective law schools -- have ruled on the side of the tyrants, some, such as Judge William Stickman, for the Western District of Pennsylvania, full well understand the implications, and they are ruling against these unconstitutional orders, in a righteous and correct manner. On September 14th, in [JOS] Butler v. Wolf, he ruled that the Governor Tom Wolf's pandemic restrictions were unconstitutional, and he upheld that ruling again on September 22nd, stating that he was not convinced by the Wolf administration's argument "that irreparable harm will result if a stay is not imposed."

In his ruling, Stickman, a Trump appointee to the Court, stated: "The liberties protected by the Constitution are not fair-weathered freedoms, in place when times are good but able to be cast aside in times of trouble. There is no question that this Country has faced, and will face, emergencies of every sort. But the solution to a national crisis can never be permitted to supersede the commitment to individual liberty that stands as the foundation of the American experiment. ... the Constitution sets certain lines that may not be crossed, even in an emergency

Quite a few judges are hiding behind Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) [Blog Editor: Short Version & Long Version] as their justification for upholding these illegal mask mandates and social distancing, even lockdowns, giving way to an erroneous view of the Constitution, since they ignore, that even the judges of the day made note of the potential for abuse of power through this ruling, if people weren't careful in the future. The judges of 1905 even stated that their ruling didn't mean government had complete authority to act in any manner contrary to one's personal and individual liberty and one's inalienable rights protected by the Constitution. 

Stickman's rulings essentially defended and upheld the people's absolute right to peaceful assembly for any reason, whether political, religious or commercial. It also upheld everybody's right to work, while rejecting the designation of "essential" and "non-essential" workers, since everybody has the right to travel to work, from across the street or across state lines, as a fundamental liberty protected by substantive due process of the law. His ruling is groundbreaking in that his court is the first to characterize the right to work as fundamental, and in so doing, he righteously and correctly limited and narrowly restricted the government's power in this case. 

Governors do not hold any inherent power to craft regulations in the face of any emergency that carry the force of law. Under the Guarantee Clause of the Constitution, that mandates our republic, only a representative legislature, either the States or Congress, can write laws that authorize any use of police powers and force and any criminal penalties. The governor of any state cannot constitutionally write laws, which means that their executive orders mandating masks and ordering economic shutdowns are completely illegal and illegitimate and can and should be ignored completely, by any American wishing to live free and survive a crisis well, through their own good common sense applied to their needs and the needs of their own families. 

As reported by Michelle Malkin on September 15th, Florida House Representative Anthony Sabatini was ecstatic over the defeat of Wolf's draconian orders, directed at "the Virus",
stating: "Some in the Judiciary are finally waking up to the fact that the government is not always right and that the Constitution is not suspended during an emergency. Sabatini, who has filed fifteen ongoing challenges to Florida's lockdown measures, added, "We're looking forward to winning."

However, over the past six months, the facts on the ground in much of America, especially the Democratic Party strongholds, reveal that most of the country was imprisoned without due process and suffered threats of renewed lockdowns, while interstate travel was severely restricted; privacy rights have been devastated and numerous business takings occurred without compensation. Many other regulations have been enforced illegally, illegitimately and outside the statutory process requirements under a pretense and cover of a health emergency, that is no more dangerous than a bad case of the flu. 

An untold millions of Americans have suffered injury, in various capacities, due to circumstances set in motion and end results of these unconstitutional actions, and if other courts in every state do not act so wisely as the Western District Court of Pennsylvania, or if states' legislatures do not pass corrective legislation to ensure such tyranny never again rises under any pretense of an "emergency", or any real emergency, they will have allowed the people's Constitutional rights to be continually suppressed and violated in the future, simply because they demand that we just trust the unelected technocrats -- the supposed "experts". 

Our inalienable rights empower each sovereign individual to make their own personal choices free from any government interference and not conditioned upon receiving any special permission from the government. As viewed through the prism of the Bill of Rights, our personal choices are insulated from government interference so long as those choices do not step on another individual's rights. And, since the government's power is derived from the consent of the people, any government action that circumvents such consent, violating our rights, is unlawful, invalid and unconstitutional.

Virtually every U.S. Governor, with the possible exception of South Dakota's Governor Kristi Noem, and thousands of America's mayors have violated the rights of their countrymen. They knowingly and criminally operated outside their oaths of office to their state constitution and the U.S. Constitution. Whether in Rutherford County or Logan, Ohio or somewhere in Pennsylvania, these petty tyrants do not have the authority to shut down entire counties and states and mandate masks for businesses and individuals, and, they certainly have no authority to place jail sentences and hefty fines against individuals they deem have violated their illegal orders. Each and every single one of them have acted outside the authority of their office.  

This must never again happen in America under any set of circumstances or any new emergency. We must ensure that there are pathways to immediate redress of grievances under any emergency orders, especially once they are found to be premised on false and misleading information and deception and they trample on our inalienable rights, inadvertently or by plan. More importantly, sometimes less is more, and our leaders should fight their impulses to resort to extraordinary measures unnecessarily, doing more harm than good, as seen via the catastrophic economic damage from the illegal lockdowns, infringing on all of our Constitutional rights. 

All Americans longing for better and more freely lived lives must continue to stand with their patriotic brothers and sisters to resist the government overreach and arrogance we see today. Keep fighting and resisting to halt the growth and expansion of the unrestrained power and corruption that runs through a deep vein in the core of all U.S. government currently, from D.C. to Tennessee to Washington and Florida and on to California, Minnesota, Illinois and all the rest. If we are to preserve our civil rights and personal freedom and liberty, we must make a firm stand against those evil and dangerous men and women currently in seats of power, whereby they have usurped Constitutional law and offered an illusion of safety to use force and compel compliance through their illegal orders, in order to return the nation to common sense governance and our constitutional principles, to restore individual sovereignty and to return America to some semblance of sanity and days that witness many of these petty tyrants and abusers of power prosecuted for violations of the federal criminal code.  

By Justin O. Smith
___________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text embraced by brackets are by the Editor. Except where indicated by “JOS”, embedded links are by the Editor.

© Justin O. Smith

Tuesday, March 10, 2020

An Intro to ‘A Clear Vision’

Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
By Rick Joyner
Intro © March 10, 2020

Regardless if you have the opinion that Rick Joyner’s (Joyner bios: Believers Portal & Wikipedia) theology is way out there or right on, the insights I just read on Church/State separation are spot on. Pay particular attention to the facts that various State Constitutions incorporated on religion that were repealed but NOT struck down by SCOTUS to demonstrate the Original Intent of America’s Founders. IT IS NOT THE LIVING CONSTITUTION crap America’s Left (Dem-Marxists) are trying to brainwash you to believe.


Pro-Original Intent Constitution

o   The Founders' Intent for the First Amendment; By Nathan McClintock; Free Republic; 5/3/2002, 8:28:44 PM


o   The Case for Original Intent; By Jamal Greene; George Washington Law Review; (PDF – 24 pages) November 2012  12 Vol. 80 No. 6

o   Original Intent –The First Amendment! Acts 4:1-20; By Michael J. Barnard; Shoreline Community Church; (PDF – 4 pages) 7/2/17

Living Constitution Implies Tyranny of Majority or the Few

o   Federalist No. 51 - The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments; By James Madison; Federalist Papers - Bill of Rights Institute; 1788





Living Constitution Rabble Tyranny

JRH 3/10/20

Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit, check 
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 
Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 


BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You're temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”
***************************
A Clear Vision—Heritage Brief 10

Word of the Week

By Rick Joyner
March 10, 2020

Following up on the fact that nowhere in The United States Constitution does it state that there must be a separation between the church and the state, it only states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Because Congress was the Federal Government, this did not prohibit the states from establishing a recognized religion if they chose to, and many of them did. 
     
For example, a couple of states made it a requirement to be of the Protestant faith to vote. Others required church attendance to vote. This did not make these laws right, and eventually they were all repealed, but that this was allowed proved that the states had authority to do such things under The Constitution. The Constitution only forbade Congress from establishing religion.
     
These religious test laws by some states were legal under The Constitution, but they were not right, and they did cause problems. The wisdom of how these matters could be worked out by the states while the whole country was not subjected to the turmoil they caused proved to be genius. 
     
It has only been when the Federal Government started to exceed the authority given to it in The Constitution, and thereby encroach on the rights of the states and the people, that the turmoil and divisions this has caused became national and threatened to tear the nation apart. These unnecessary pressures will continue to grow until the Federal Government returns to its constitutional boundaries, and the rights of the states and the people that it has usurped is returned to them.
     
Concerning the proper and constitutional relationship between the church and the state, we have all likely witnessed men and women who were good friends ruin that friendship by getting married. It is a worthy goal for those who are married to be friends, but the love for each as friends may not work well in the more committed bonds of marriage. This is why many languages have different words for these two types of affection—friendship and romantic love. The point is that the church and the state should have a relationship as friends, but not marriage. 
     
The church is called to be the bride of Christ, alone. In relation to the bride of Christ, the state is called to be like the eunuchs who provided security for the king and his bride. They defend her if necessary, but they can have no relationship with her beyond this.
     
When the relationship between church and state went beyond what it is supposed to be, it brought upon the earth the darkest of times—the Dark Ages. The abuses of the wrongful union of the church to the state was deeply impressed on the early Americans. Many had been witnesses to, or victims of, the horrible corruption that came from this wrongful union of the church and state in Europe, which culminated in the worst persecution in human history—The Inquisition. 
     
The Inquisition was the persecution by Christians of other Christians and Jews. It was only possible by the institutional church being married to the state at that time. Christians and Jews who would not conform to the dogma of the institutional church of the time were slaughtered on an incomprehensible scale. Halley’s Bible Handbook estimates that up to 50 million of these non-conformist Christians and Jews were tortured and killed in The Inquisition. This number is corroborated by other historians. We can read in such works as Foxe’s Book of Martyrs the kind of demented and diabolical tortures used by The Inquisition. This was truly one of mankind’s darkest hours, and done in the name of Christ by the harlot church that had wrongfully married the state.
     
With many of the first colonists being victims of this persecution—and the leaders of the independence movement in America knowing their stories well—when The British imposed a law on the colonies that no minister of the gospel could be licensed except through The Church of England, it was intolerable to the colonists. 
     
The Founders of the American Republic were resolute in ensuring that such a thing would never happen in America. To do this they established the government first and foremost on the freedom of religion, resolving to keep the Federal Government out of religion, but a protector of religious freedom.
     
As the Jews of Europe were persecuted along with the Protestants and other Christian movements, they also fled to America to escape. They were both welcomed and honored by their Christian fellow colonists. Those of other religions, or no religion, also found in America the tolerance and freedom they had not found anywhere else in the world. America was born as a haven for religiously persecuted people. 
     
The American Founders were resolved to keep the church and state as separate entities, but it was clearly to keep the state out of the church’s business, not the other way around. We must then ask, how did The Supreme Court and many lower courts issue so many decisions prohibiting the free exercise of religion?  By blatantly violating The Constitution and The First Amendment. The leadership of Congress was too weak or inept to confront this tyrannical abuse by the judiciary.
     
If our Republic is to be preserved, we must recover the fact that The Supreme Court is not the “supreme law of the land”—The Constitution is. The Supreme Court has made many unconstitutional decisions in its history, some of which were reversed by later courts, but many have not. In recent times it is piling them up almost yearly because it has now departed so far from the lane The Constitution gave to the judiciary. If this is not corrected, it will soon cause the destruction of the Republic, just as Jefferson and other Founders warned.
     
We will cover these violations of The Constitution in more detail in future Briefs, along with the devastating impact they have had on the nation. The Judicial Branch may have been the biggest culprit in this, but all three branches are guilty of deviating from the clear and limited authority given to the Federal Government by The Constitution. The stress this has put on the entire country has us at the breaking point. Under The Constitution, the people are the sovereign. The longer we wait to demand that our Federal Government obey The Constitution, the greater the cost it will be to save our Republic.

************
I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations.
– James Madison, author of The Constitution and fifth President of the United States

     We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
 –Preamble to the United States Constitution
+++++++++++++++++++++
BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You're temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”
_____________________________
An Intro to ‘A Clear Vision’
Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
Intro © March 10, 2020
__________________________
A Clear Vision—Heritage Brief 10

© 2020 by Rick Joyner. All rights reserved.