John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© April 2, 2020
Increasingly coup-elected faux-Prez Biden is demonstrating
public incoherence. It’s an indication someone else is running the Executive
Branch.
ALSO, as Leftist MSM realizes they screwed up in protecting
and promoting Dementia Joe’s election are beginning to publicize information
they once discredited as conspiracy news.
On a personal level, I have little confidence Biden/Harris
will be removed from their puppet stations because that would crack the door
open to expose Deep State puppeteers operating the USA unconstitutionally. The
puppeteers will not give up power willingly. Which means I doubt any legal
apparatus (I hope I’m wrong) will succeed in elections or Courts.
SO, where does that leave a restored Republic? Either a Deep
State shoring up dictatorial power ending the Founders’ Republic or a civil war
which may or may not succeed restoring some form of a new Constitutional Republic
hopefully with at least some of the fingerprints of America’s Founders on a
restored People’s Republic.
Future change or resistance to Globalist Transformation
could be soon or decades depending on the degree the puppeteers are exposed to
the American Public. It really is difficult to tell, but there is a sense
SOMETHING is about to drop. I hope others have the same sense that something is
happening behind the scenes that manifests to Public review.
Here are some cross posts that have ignited my sense
antennas.
JRH 4/2/22
I need your generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to overcome research expenses:
Please
Support SlantRight 2.0
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
**************************
Documentary Blows the Lid off the $400 Million Zuckerberg
Effort to Elect Biden
Mark
Zuckerberg speaks to Congress
By HANNAH BLEAU
March 31, 2022
Breitbart
Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg spent nearly $400 million on
the 2020 presidential election in an effort to bolster then-candidate Joe Biden
and quash former President Donald Trump, a documentary film from Citizens
United Productions, Rigged:
The Zuckerberg-Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump, details.
The 40-minute documentary blows the lid off the tech
billionaire’s efforts, alongside left-wing operatives, to unseat Trump under
the guise of providing aid to assist with safety in the wake of the Chinese
coronavirus pandemic. These leftists essentially dumped private funding into
government elections, creating an artificial groundswell of get-out-the-vote
efforts for Biden, whose public enthusiasm levels clearly waned throughout the
election cycle, prompting jokes about the then-candidate hiding in his
basement.
Overall, Zuckerberg spent $400 million in 2020 — only $61
million short of the $461 million the Democratic National Committee (DNC)
spent in both 2019 and 2020.
The explosive documentary details just how these left-wing
operatives sprinkled “Zuck Bucks” in various areas around the country to
influence the election. All of this is documented via 990 forms non-profit
groups file with the IRS.
Specifically, the documentary “traces the river of cash
flowing from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to a pair of 501(c)(3) non-profit
organizations, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) and the Center for
Election Innovation and Research (CEIR).” Interestingly, the Chan Zuckerberg
Institute happens to involve a number of well-connected Democrat players,
including former President Obama’s former campaign manager, David Plouffe, whom
the press release describes as the institute’s “Strategist in Residence.” Joel
Benenson, the chief strategist for twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary
Clinton, also conveniently served as an adviser at the institute.
The CTCL, which received roughly $328 million in Zuckerberg
money, awarded about 2,500 grants around the country. And while Zuckerberg’s
team claims that Trump areas were awarded more money than Biden areas, the
documentary explains how that assertion is “enormously, and perhaps purposely,
misleading, because of the approximately 160 grants of $400,000 or more –
totaling some $270 million – an incredible 92 percent of those funds went to
jurisdictions carried by Joe Biden in 2020.”
As Breitbart News detailed consistently throughout the
election year, Democrats used the Chinese coronavirus pandemic to usher in new
voting rules under the guise of public safety, and that is exactly what “Zuck
Bucks” operated under as well, as the grants were purportedly designed to
assist with the “safe administration of public elections” throughout the
pandemic. In other words, this money rushed to Democrat strongholds, as well as
key swing areas, under the guise of addressing pandemic needs. Yet, that is not
what they really intended it to do.
“This is all about the great intention of, hey, we’re gonna
make it more secure,” Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry says in the
documentary, as hardly any of the money went toward Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE).
“We’re gonna make it more safe. We want to make sure that
people feel comfortable coming to the poll, but that’s not what they ended up
doing,” Landry added, as these jurisdictions used the money to push Democrat
objectives such as universal mail-in voting and ballot drop boxes, just as two
examples. In other words, the money was used to create an artificial buzz
benefiting Joe Biden. The money itself went to nearly every state– 48/50,
including Democrat strongholds. According to the documentary, this strategy —
dumping money in areas that Biden was sure to win (California) and sure to lose
(Texas) “reveals that a secondary aim of the plan was to score a public
relations victory by padding Biden’s popular vote tally, in the event that he
lost narrowly in the Electoral College.”
Essentially, “Zuck Bucks” ultimately “pressured”
governmental entities to adopt these radical Democrat ideas to transform the
election, pushing mail-in ballots and increasing the number of ballot drop
boxes, both of which stand as a “rampant invitation” for fraud, Sen. Ted Cruz
(R-TX) notes in the documentary. Ultimately, the film notes that the
coronavirus provided the “perfect cover” for Zuckerberg’s money to go to work
in crucial battleground states, fulfilling the Democrat mantra of never
letting a crisis go to waste.
Further, the film specifically focuses on three key
battleground states, which Biden won by slim margins — Wisconsin, Arizona, and
Georgia.
CTCL dumped $860,000 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, for
example, and another $1.2 million in Green Bay and Madison, $1.7 million in
Racine, and $3.4 million in Milwaukee. Similarly, the documentary reveals
that $5.1 million of the Zuckerberg money went to Arizona. What is more,
“four difference-making counties – Maricopa, Pima, Apache, and Coconino –
received nearly 76 percent of the grants, and all were carried by Joe Biden,”
per the press release. Notably, Biden won Arizona by less than half a
percentage point, or fewer than 11,000 votes.
Perhaps most stunningly, $50 million in grants from both
CTCL and CEIR went to the Peach State:
A whopping 94 percent of the
CTCL funds in the state went to jurisdictions carried by Biden. Additionally,
the consent decree signed off on by Georgia Secretary of State Brad
Raffensperger undercut the process for matching signatures on
absentee ballots and restricted the ability to challenge contested ballots.
“In my mind, they were clearly rigging the election,” former
House Speaker Newt Gingrich says in Rigged. “I’m not convinced that
the election was stolen on Election Day. I think the bigger story was that
across the whole country for months, there was an effort to rig the election to
make it virtually impossible for Trump to win.”
“We’ll follow the money and uncover the startling facts
behind Election 2020,” Citizens United President David N. Bossie, who narrates
the documentary, said. “In order to answer the question once and for all: What
happened? And to ensure it never happens again.”
Former President Trump, who speaks in the film, noted that
Zuckerberg was “putting money under the guise that he’s going to open up the
election,” deeming it “crap.”
“That’s all crap. Not gonna open it up. He’s closing it. He’s
making it impossible for a Republican to win,” he said.
Ultimately, the documentary is aiming at raising awareness
of the powerful influence Zuckerberg and left-wing operatives had in the 2020
election, pulling strings behind the scenes and using the distraction of
pandemic panic as a means to take down Trump.
“He should totally be held accountable,” Trump says in Rigged.
“And he should never be allowed to do it again. And nobody else should. It was
a rigged election. People have to find out what happened and they have to hold
people accountable.”
The documentary will premiere at Trump’s “Winter White
House” Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, on April 5, 2022. Viewers can
watch the film after the premiere at www.Rigged2020.com.
READ MORE STORIES ABOUT:
Politics,
David Bossie, election integrity,
Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg
Copyright © 2022 Breitbart
++++++++++++++++++
Mark Levin lays out the FACTS on the need for a criminal
investigation into Joe Biden
Mark
Levin
By THE RIGHT SCOOP
[staff]
April 1, 2022 1:18 PM
The
Right Scoop
Here’s another great segment from The Great One.
Last night Mark Levin laid the facts out on Hannity and
explained why there needs to be a criminal investigation into Joe Biden over
his role into the business dealings of Hunter Biden:
Rumble VIDEO: The
Biden Corruption Conspiracy
[Posted by Mark Levin Show
Published April 1, 2022
Joe Biden’s legacy is one of
dishonesty and lies. A federal investigation is finally underway to find out
more about Hunter and Joe Biden’s underhanded foreign dealings and monetary
transactions. The records show more evidence of the Democrats and Mainstream
Media’s agenda to demonize conservatives and cover up their own misconduct. Our
deceiver in chief should go down as the most corrupt president in history.]
Levin says that is very possible that Joe Biden might be the
most corrupt president we’ve ever had and the media is still running
interference for him, as will his corrupt Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Levin says there’s no way Garland will allow a criminal investigation into Joe
Biden.
In calling for a special prosecutor, Levin also reminds
us of Tony Bobulinski, who came out in 2020 and verified that Joe
Biden not only knew of his son’s dealings but was supposed to get a 10% cut.
In a related segment a former US Attorney was on Fox News to
discuss Hunter Biden yesterday and echoed a similar sentiment, saying that the
entire family should be under investigation. He added that if it were anyone
else, there would have been criminal indictments a long time ago:
Rumble VIDEO: Former
Prosecutor on Hunter Biden: Anybody Else Would Have Been Indicted Already
[Posted by Mr Producer Media
Published April 1, 2022
… MORE
DESCRIPTION]
© The Right Scoop 2009-2022. All
rights reserved.
+++++++++++++++++++
Rumble VIDEO: Episode
1,752 - Miranda Devine: The Secrets Of The Laptop From Hell; Rigged 2020 The
Movie
Posted by Bannons
War Room
Published April 1, 2022
We discuss breaking news with the economy, judge Jackson,
Hunter Biden's laptop, and more.
Our guests are: Mike Davis, Dave Bossie, Miranda Devine
Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join
Aired On: 4/01//2022
Watch:
On the Web: http://www.warroom.org
… MORE
DESCRIPTION
+++++++++++++++
Who Is REALLY Running the Country?
We can speculate (and often do) about who is really
calling the shots out of DC and across the globe. The only thing we know for
certain is that it's neither Joe Biden or Kamala Harris in charge.
Puppeteers
& Biden-Harris
By JD Rucker
April 1, 2022
NOQ
Report
JD Rucker Podcast: Who
Is REALLY Running the Country?
On today’s episode of JD Rucker LIVE,
I took questions from listeners about whatever topic they liked. A variation of
one question kept popping up — who is REALLY running America? It’s obviously
not Joe Biden or the Democrat Party as they have demonstrated they’re
somebody’s pawns. It’s not the GOP in DC who have very little power, and while
at least half of them are corrupted by The Swamp they just don’t have the
gumption to actually make anything happen.
I’m replaying this live show on my podcast, The Midnight Sentinel, because it’s an
important topic. Yes, I discussed many issues outside of that question but it’s
the one that stood out as important enough to discuss further.
So, who’s running the United States? Is it the same people
who are running the world? Probably. And unfortunately that may have been the
case from George H. W. Bush all the way through to Barack Obama. There was a
blip in their control structure when Donald Trump won, which is why I’m
convinced they did everything they could to steal the election from him in
2020.
Below, I made a list of the ten people/groups I believe are
most likely to be truly in charge. It’s in no particular order so don’t give
more weight to the top or the bottom. To be clear, neither I nor anyone outside
of the inner circle of evil knowledge could possibly know for sure who’s really
in charge. Whoever we might think it is at any given moment is almost certainly
working on behalf of someone or something else. Until we get to the top of the
evil food chain with Satan himself, everyone else is just a minion. The people
and groups on this list happen to be extremely powerful minions.
There’s an important thing to consider before we get to the
list, and that’s to know the difference between the high-level puppets and the
actual puppet masters. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are definitely puppets.
Missing from the list below are two prominent people and one prominent
organization that are puppet masters in their own right, but who are not really
at the top of the evil hierarchy even if many believe they are.
Bill and Hillary Clinton may be elites in the Democrat
Party, but they are not top-tier globalists. They are pawns, middle managers
really, who answer to higher players. The United Nations is also conspicuously
missing from the list because they tend to be far too feckless to possibly be at
or even near the top of the food chain. Moreover, there is far less control
over who gets to participate at the U.N. than in organizations such as the
World Economic Forum in which completely control is centralized.
By no means is this list complete. There are players I’ve
never even heard of who may be more powerful than any of the people or groups
below. There are probably players who we all have heard of who may be separated
publicly but fully engaged privately. Elon Musk’s name was thrown out in one of
the questions I was asked on the show. He’s said things that make us wonder
about his motivations even as he’s said other things that make him seem like a
“good guy.”
So, who is at least partially calling the shots? Who’s
controlling Joe Biden’s strings? The closest thing to a right answer is that
it’s a combination of some or even all of the ten entities listed below:
§
Barack Obama et al. – Susan Rice,
John Brennan, and the various cohorts of Barack Obama are definitely
influencing the White House, bureaucrats, and members of Congress. The only
question is whether Obama emerged from being a puppet to a puppet-master or if
he’s still doing the bidding of globalists above him.
§
Klaus Schwab and the WEF – This is
arguably the most compelling option among the various individuals because
Schwab has been working towards The Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial
Revolution since before many of our readers and listeners were even born. The
World Economic Forum is central to the globalists’ dreams. Is it the main hub
or is the public facing version of a much darker organization?
§
The Deep State – How much control
does the Deep State have over DC? All of it and none of it. That’s the enigma
they represent because while they may control the three letter agencies as well
as the media, they could just as easily be getting their orders from outside as
they could be simply making it all up themselves.
§
George Soros and Open Societies –
This is another intriguing consideration because while the WEF’s tentacles are
geared towards grooming future globalist leaders, Open Societies works to
actually put them in power.
§
Chinese Communist Party – They may
be an external power trying to influence America or they may be so deeply
embedded that they actually have much more control than we know.
§
Bill Gates et al. – Of all those on
the list, Gates and his various organizations seem to be more likely to be powerful
pawns than actual puppet-masters. Then again, that may be the front-facing
persona they want everyone to think is real.
§ Vatican –
It’s a conspiracy theory list, therefore the Vatican has to be on it. With Pope
Francis in charge, there’s no telling how tied they are with the globalist
elites. [Blog Editor: I’m not a hate-Roman-Catholics-kind-of-guy even
though I disagree with most Catholic theology. I am an anti-Communist Pope
because guy stands for Marxist Liberation theology and appears to gravitate
toward acceptance of Biblically condemned morality.]
§ Powers
and Principalities – Ephesians 6:12. We may have never even seen the
puppet-masters. [Blog Editor: The context of Ephesians 6:12 via Ephesians
6: 10-17 NKJV]
§ The
Rothchilds [sic] – It’s a conspiracy theory list, therefore the
Rothchilds [sic] have to be on it. [Blog Editor: Way too many people look at
the
Rothschilds Jewish heritage and blame all Jewry for a NWO world
domination agenda. That simply is an unjust application. It’s like blaming all
Christians for a few who have a Christian heritage but turned to atheistic
Communism to institute a transformed Globalist NWO. Covenant breaking is separating
from God regardless if one is Jewish or Christian in their heritage.]
§
The Real New World Order – The
nebulous New World Order may actually be a tangible New World Order that nobody
fully understands. In fact, everyone on this list may be a part of it.
Tinfoil hat stuff aside, it’s clear that the so-called
leader of the free world isn’t really the leader of anything. Someone is
pushing this nation towards oblivion, but Joe Biden is just a mindless conduit.
Rumble VIDEO: Who
Is REALLY Running the Country?
[Posted by The
JD Rucker Show
Published April 1, 2022
… A LOT
MORE IN DESCRIPTION]
© 2021 NOQ Report
++++++++++++++++++++++
See the full list of 51 deep state “intelligence”
officials who lied about Hunter Biden’s laptop to try to defeat Trump in 2020
John
Brennan - former CIA Director
By JD
Heyes
3/31/22
News
Target
If any reasonable, thinking American doubted the
existence of a “deep state” before Donald Trump became president, they were
treated to a four-year object lesson in just how real it is.
Trump, the ultimate outsider candidate who had no political
skeletons, was too popular to be canceled, and could not be bought off because
he was already a billionaire, rankled and frightened the powerbroker elite in
Washington because he really did believe in his “America First” agenda that
they will never accept because they profit off of selling America out.
As such, the deep state went after Trump with a vengeance
that was unprecedented against a president, even prior Republicans like Ronald
Reagan and George W. Bush, the latter of whom is fully ensconced in the elitist
D.C. power structure. The intelligence community came together like never
before to spread lies about Trump, drop false narratives and plant fake stories
that were eagerly parroted by the legacy left-wing media that serves as little
more than the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.
To emphasize just how hard the deep state went after Trump,
he became the first president to be impeached twice, and on the
flimsiest of reasons, though both times the Senate refused to convict him.
The final act of the politically weaponized deep state,
however, came just a few weeks prior to the 2020 election in November.
In mid-October, the New York Post, citing emails, photos and
other materials found
on a laptop Hunter Biden had abandoned at a computer repair
shop in Delaware in 2019, published
a series of bombshell reports detailing what a scumbag he is
and how he used his father’s connections to land lucrative business deals and
positions with foreign governments and companies, with a kickback percentage
going to Daddy Joe.
While Big Tech and Big Media colluded to censor and
discredit the reports, 51 officials within the deep state intelligence
community gave them cover by signing a letter claiming that, while they did not
know for sure, it appeared that the details contained in The
Post’s reporting had ‘all the hallmarks’ of a “Russian disinformation
campaign.”
But in fact, The Post’s reporting was based on legitimate
factual information gleaned from Biden’s laptop and the intelligence community
‘experts’ knew that. But their objective was to get rid of Trump and derail his
MAGA agenda, a goal shared with an eager-to-be-duped media that wanted Trump
gone because they just didn’t like his conservative America-first agenda.
It was only after the election and Joe Biden had been safely
installed in the White House that some media outlets began to confirm The
Post’s original reporting. Politico did last year; The New York Times did so
just last week in a report noting that Hunter Biden remains under investigation
by the Justice Department for potential violations of the Foreign Agent
Registration Act (FARA) and tax fraud.
By the way, The Post followed up with those 51 now-former
intelligence community officials, and in an editorial published earlier this
week, the paper noted that it had tried to contact all of them to see if they
had any remorse for claiming — falsely — that Biden’s laptop may have been Russian disinfo.
None did.
Here is the list, per
The Post:
Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t
respond.
Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence,
now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE
TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a
cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”
Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense
secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State
University: Declined comment.
John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC
and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council
chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.
Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy
director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.
John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now
teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.
Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at
George Mason University: Didn’t respond.
Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for
intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.
Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy
director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.
Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism
Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter
Terrorism: Didn’t respond.
Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center
acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t
know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian
disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the
context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do —
Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to
be prudent.”
Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center
deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the
statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”
John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t
respond.
Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior
advisor to The Chertoff Group:
Didn’t respond.
Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for
NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t
respond.
Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency
general counsel: Didn’t respond.
David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank
you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”
Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t
respond.
Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations
officer: Didn’t respond.
Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations
officer: Didn’t respond.
John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t
respond.
David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations
officer: Didn’t respond.
Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer,
now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.
David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t
respond.
Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer,
now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t
respond.
Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence
officer: Didn’t respond.
James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t
respond.
David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t
respond.
Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support
officer: Didn’t respond.
Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations
officer: Didn’t respond.
Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t
respond.
Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t
respond.
Roger Zane George, former national intelligence
officer: Didn’t respond.
Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence
officer: Didn’t respond.
Kent Harrington, former national intelligence
officer: Didn’t respond.
Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now
president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not
changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of
the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and
making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really
changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake,
but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”
Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School
of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.
Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t
respond.
Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations
officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t
have any comment. I would need a little more information.”
Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political
Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I
have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind
signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly
politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”
Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations
officer: Didn’t respond.
Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and
senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.
John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer: Declined
to comment.
Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior
director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.
Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for
global issues: Didn’t respond.
Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive
director: Didn’t respond.
David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection
Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.
Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council
chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International
Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”
Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t
be reached.
Sources include:
NYPost.com
USAFeatures.news
NewsTarget.com © 2021 All
Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and
is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for
content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is
provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as
a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes
no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this
website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this
site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this
site are the property of their respective owners.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Rumble VIDEO: Joe
Hoft of TGP Talks with Intel Expert Tony Shafer on Bill Barr, 2020 Election,
and More
Posted by The Gateway Pundit
Published March 31, 2022
Joe Hoft of TGP Talks with Tony Shafer
[Blog Editor: TGP post associated with the video: “Bill
Barr Broke the Law… The Fix Is In… Bill Barr Did Not Do His Job” – EXCLUSIVE
VIDEO: Tony Shaffer on Barr’s Actions After the 2020 Election; By Joe Hoft; The Gateway Pundit;
3/31/22 2:30pm]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
[Blog Editor: The most relevant content in the video
below is the roughly first 30-minutes interview with Miranda Devine author of The
Laptop from Hell.]
Rumble VIDEO: Hunter’s
Laptop from Hell and the War in Ukraine With Miranda Devine
Posted by The
Ann and Phelim Scoop
Published March 16, 2022
Three weeks before the 2020 election, Big Tech censored and
banned the New York Post’s bombshell story about the contents of Hunter Biden’s
laptop, which exposed his corruption related to Ukraine. Now, Joe Biden is
President and there is a war in Ukraine. The story is incredibly relevant, but
the media won’t touch it. We are joined by Miranda Devine, who literally wrote
the book on Hunter’s laptop, to explain how this story directly relates to the
Russo-Ukrainian war and US policy towards it.
Also on this episode, we discuss the disastrous impacts of
masking and school shutdowns on kids, a tragic story from the “Sanctuary state”
of California, and the somber anniversary of the start of the Gosnell trial.
… MORE
DESCRIPTION
