The mRNA Jab has had prolific adverse side effects (E.G.: HERE,
HERE,
HERE,
HERE
& HERE)
up to and including Sudden Death (E.G.: HERE, HERE
& HERE)
and many anti-Jab physicians have predicted the possibility of adverse side
effects manifesting in a Jabbed person’s unknown future (E.G.: HERE,
HERE,
HERE,
HERE
& HERE).
AND STILL the lying science propagandizes “Safe and Effective”. The lying
science is so dedicated to the “Safe and Effective” LIE that if you search
engine many of the names associated with the embedded links I provided demonstrating
the lying propaganda, you will discover vilification posts of the doctors and
scientists that were highly esteemed prior to COVID and mRNA. Once they
questioned the Globalist narrative, they went from esteemed to villains.
The true villains are the perpetrators of lying science
which in my opinion shows an alignment toward a Globalist-Marxist-Corporatist
(as in pseudo-Fascist) agenda of a societal cultural transformation benefitting
the Elitist-Few at the expense of Mass-Majority. Friends that is tyranny.
NEVERTHELESS, the point I’m about to make is the popping of
yet another lying bubble science that vilified Ivermectin as an actual
SAFE AND EFFECTIVE and inexpensive measure that could have been used to
combat the Wuhan-China Lab virus that could have prevented the deaths of
millions of COVID victims.
AND NOW the easy to comprehend study vindicating IVERMECTIN
that Big Pharma did NOT want used because it would have hindered BILLIONS of
dollars in Stakeholder profits and slowed the execution of Globalist tyranny
agenda.
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My
Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is
pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
*************************
"Ivermectin Worked!": Peer-Reviewed Study Finds
74% Reduction in Excess Deaths
Let this be another tally mark for when the
“conspiracy theorists” got it right all along.
Ivermectin, a controversially-discussed drug in the context
of the COVID-19 pandemic, was found in a 2020 study from Peru to significantly
reduce COVID-related deaths. With the backing of a peer-reviewed publication, this assertion is more
potent than ever.
Dr. Pierre Kory, an early advocate for Ivermectin
in the treatment of COVID-19, highlighted this particular study. At the time,
it was merely a preprint - meaning it hadn’t undergone the rigorous peer-review
process that acts as a hallmark for credible scientific research. Yet, the data
was compelling enough for Dr. Kory and his associates at the FLCCC to champion
widespread Ivermectin distribution.
Detractors pointed out the lack of peer review, dismissing
the study and likening Ivermectin's use for COVID-19 to “taking horse
medicine.” Fast forward two years, and this once-dismissed preprint has been
rigorously examined and accepted by a renowned scientific journal.
The study delved into the effectiveness of
Ivermectin in reducing excess COVID-19-related deaths across Peru’s 25 states
in 2020. It was observed that different regions implemented varying degrees of
Ivermectin distribution. While some states went all out and distributed maximum
doses, others adopted a moderate approach, and a few limited its distribution.
The findings were staggering: states with the most intensive
Ivermectin use observed a 74% average reduction in excess
deaths within 30 days post-peak deaths.
When a subsequent Peru presidential administration limited
Ivermectin use, there was a notable rise in the death rate. The correlation
between Ivermectin use and decreased mortality seemed undeniable. Before
Ivermectin use was restricted under the new president, Peru experienced a
14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths. However, this was followed by a
13-fold increase in the succeeding two months after Ivermectin's restriction.
So, that’s another piece of additional evidence that, indeed, yes, “ivermectin
worked!”
Ivermectin is vindicated — but it’s also too little too
late.
Dr. McCullough has reported that about 97% of Americans have
already developed natural immunity to COVID-19, which offers strong and robust
protection. And after mass COVID vaccination has nearly come to a complete
halt, the FDA has now finally admitted that doctors can freely prescribe
ivermectin for COVID. The timing, by no stretch, is suspicious.
So, there you have it. Ivermectin works! But you probably
already knew that two years ago. Let this be another tally mark for when the
“conspiracy theorists” got it right all along.
For more information on this story, check out Kim
Iversen’s full video below:
I became aware of Glenn Beck’s new book “The Great
Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism” from the
blog NO THOUGHT POLICE:
Freedom of thought and speech not policed here! The blog’s author goes
by Rev. Patti. Rev. Patti (so far) is posting a chapter from Beck’s book which
up to this writing is up to two chapters in PDF
form.
Beck begins by attempting to define the political nature of The
Great Reset prior to revealing its nefarious details. Essentially, I understand
Beck’s definition of The Great Reset to be a nebulous combination
neo-Marxist-Socialism leaning closer to Corporate Fascism.
Before I proceed with a 1-hour and 6-minute Glenn Beck discussion
on his book The Great Reset, here is a publisher Simon
& Schuster description (where the book can also be purchased
to support the Beck effort):
In The Great Reset: Joe
Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism, New York Times bestselling
author and nationally syndicated radio host Glenn Beck argues that the American
way of life will not survive the Great Reset and warns us to stop it before
it's too late to reverse course.
An international conspiracy between powerful bankers, business leaders, and
government officials; closed-door meetings in the Swiss Alps; and calls for a
radical transformation of every society on earth—the Great Reset sounds like it
is one henchman-with-an-eyepatch away from being the plot for the next James
Bond movie.
But the Great Reset is not a work of fiction. It is a highly
influential movement among the world’s elite to “reset” the global economy
using banks, government programs, and environmental, social, and governance
metrics. If they are successful and the Great Reset is finalized, it would put
substantially more economic and social power in the hands of large
corporations, international institutions, banks, and government officials,
including Joe Biden, the United Nations, and many of the members of the World
Economic Forum.
In The Great Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century
Fascism, Glenn Beck uses his trademark blend of humor, storytelling,
and detailed analysis to reveal for the first time the unbelievable truth about
the Great Reset, tying together nearly two decades of groundbreaking research
about authoritarian movements and their efforts to fundamentally transform the
United States.
The roadmap to stopping the Great Reset begins with fully understanding what
the free peoples of the world are up against, and no resource provides more
information about this radical movement than Glenn Beck’s The Great
Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism.
After the video I am cross posting a Blaze Media
article of Kim Iverson’s opinion of Beck’s book The Great Reset which includes
a couple of Youtube videos.
Kim Iversen, journalist, YouTuber, and host of "The
Kim Iversen Show," reacted to Glenn Beck's appearance last
week on "Tucker Carlson Tonight" by conceding that, while the subject
of Beck's new book, "The Great
Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism"
might at first sound "a little bit loony," closer analysis confirms
"this isn't such a crazy conspiracy theory after all."
"Glenn Beck was on Tucker Carlson's show last week
touting what has been called a right-wing conspiracy theory and discussing his
new book, 'The Great Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century
Fascism'," began Iverson on The Hill's
"Rising."
"Well, maybe that all sounds a little bit loony — and
believe me, I do think Glenn Beck tends to be a loon," she quipped.
"But, maybe this isn't such a crazy conspiracy theory after all. And after
seeing everything we've seen with the governments enacting all sorts of
authoritarian controls and many other conspiracy theories coming true, maybe
there's something to be concerned about. So, what is the Great Reset? The name
even sounds conspiratorial, but believe it or not, it's a real thing."
Iverson went on to explain exactly who is behind the Great
Reset, what their agenda entails, how they are using the COVID-19 pandemic to
"to rebuild society in a way the global elites see best fit."
"You'll own nothing and you will be happy: That's what
they're saying," Iverson explained. "And with inflation sky high and
no signs of it slowing down, they might be right. We are on our way to becoming
a nation of renters, but don't worry it's nothing to fear ... don't worry,
everything is being done under the premise that this is all ... being done for
our own good, the benefit of a collective society, and we will be happy,"
she added sarcastically.
Iverson concluded by asking, "Who thinks it's a good
idea that a bunch of corporate millionaire and billionaires and world leaders
are getting together and coming up with what's best for we the little people? I
mean, who thinks that that's a really good idea? And who thinks that they are
going to be doing it for our benefit? But, of course they're going to frame it like
'Oh, this is good for you. You're going to rent. You'll own nothing and you'll
be happy. Don't worry about it' ... When you look at the actual list of
partners with the World Economic Forum, they control everything. They control
media. They control health. They control business. They control everything, and
so then it does become, how do we people fight against that?"
Rising is a weekday morning show
with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers
inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the
day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can
predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by
breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding
answers during interviews with the country's most important political
newsmakers.
Iversen joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to discuss
what The Great Reset is and how YOU can help stop it. Watch the video clip from
"The Glenn Beck Program" below:
Despite what The World Economic
Forum may say, the Great Reset IS very concerning, and it’s not just conservatives
saying so. Kim Iversen, a self-described liberal, host of The Kim Iversen Show,
and contributor for The Hill, joins Glenn to explain why this plan to transform
capitalism as we know it should worry us all. Glenn and Kim discuss what The
Great Reset is and how YOU can help stop it…
Dr. Joseph Mercola posted yesterday (11/3/21) on how the U.S.
government – which used to work for WE THE PEOPLE – is constantly changing
rules to hide mRNA jab injuries and to prevent WE THE PEOPLE from having legal
recourse when the now
voluminous mRNA jab injuries occur. The article focus is
fraudulently elected Biden EO to force private businesses with 100+ employees
to be mandated to jab with OSHA providing a pass to jab injuries.
Yet fascinatingly, Dr. Mercola leads off with a roughly 10-minute
video of Kim Iverson covering the massive peoples protesting Jab Mandates in
Europe and Australia even with BRUTAL police enforcement trying to disperse
protestors. Iverson sadly points to the lack of Jab Mandate protests in the USA
surmising Americans have become more accustomed to AUTHORITARIAN RULE with an accommodating
SHEEPLE CLASS. I found the report VERY sad and disturbing for America’s future
as the Land of Liberty.
JRH 11/4/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via - credit cards, check
cards
Kim Iversen details the protests
against vaccine mandates taking place worldwide. … MORE TO READ]
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
ØThe
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has amended its
injury recording rule in a way that will hide the true extent of the damage
that the COVID jab mandate will have on the American workforce
ØAccording
to OSHA rules, employers must record and report work-related illnesses,
injuries and fatalities. This recording requirement initially also applied to
adverse reactions suffered by employees who had to get the COVID shot as a
requirement for employment. This rule was changed in late May 2021
ØOSHA
will not enforce the recording requirement if the injury or fatality involves
the COVID jab, even if required for employment. The nonenforcement will remain
through May 2022. With this change, OSHA is covering up vaccine injuries — and
hindering workers from seeking workers’ compensation
ØMeanwhile,
federal employees required to get the COVID jab will be eligible for
compensation for injuries through the Federal Employee’s Compensation Act
(FECA)
ØHaving large numbers of injury reports can
raise a company’s insurance costs. However, if OSHA is going to require all
employers with 100 or more employees to implement vaccine mandates, then
companies will be in the same boat and none will be at a particular disadvantage,
so OSHA really needs to change its recordability guidance back
As reported by Kim Iversen above, around the world people
are gathering for massive protests against COVID shot mandates. In
mid-September 2021, Italy became the first European country to announce the
implementation of mandatory COVID-19 health passes (so-called “Green Pass”) for
all workers, both public and private.
The Italian mandate took effect October 15, 2021. Residents
have been protesting in the streets for months on end and there’s no sign of
them letting up. Demonstrations are also taking place in The Netherlands,
Switzerland, Luxembourg, Greece, Romania, Slovenia, Australia and France.
Even in Israel, mass protests are now taking place as it was
announced Israeli’s will lose their health pass privileges unless they get a
third booster shot six months after their second dose. New York City has also
seen large protests in the wake of its vaccine requirement for restaurants and
other public venues.
Leaders Turn a Blind Eye
Yet, despite massive protests, the push for vaccine mandates
and vaccine passports that will create a two-tier society continue unabated.
With few exceptions, world leaders are simply turning a blind eye and a deaf
ear to the fact that their residents want nothing to do with their new world
order.
At the same time, government agencies charged with keeping
us safe are doing the complete opposite. That includes the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA), which President Biden has placed in charge of
enforcing his unconstitutional edict that private companies with 100 employees
or more must make COVID “vaccination” a requirement for employment or face
fines of as much as $700,000 per incidence.1
OSHA will issue the mandate for employers as an emergency
temporary standard (ETS), but as of this writing, no official mandate has
actually been issued.
According to an October 18, 2021, report by PJ Media,2 OSHA
has sent a draft to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. Since
it’s being issued as an ETS, there will be no public comment period.
Once the OMB review is finalized, the vaccination rule will
be published. Only then will the mandate actually go into effect. That said,
OSHA has already amended an already existing rule in a way that will hide the
true extent of the damage that this mandate will have on the American
workforce.
OSHA Rule Change Covers Up Vaccine Injuries
According to OSHA rules (29 CFR 19043), employers
must record and report work-related illnesses, injuries and fatalities, whether
the employer was at fault or not. As reported May 26, 2021, by employment law
firm Ogletree Deakins,4 this recording requirement initially
also applied to adverse reactions suffered by employees who had to get the COVID
shot as a requirement for employment.
The original guidance stated that employers were required to
record an employee’s adverse reaction to the COVID jab if the shot was a)
work-related, 2) a new case under 29 C.F.R. 1904.6 and 3) met one or more OSHA
general recording criteria set out in 29 C.F.R. 1904.7. OSHA specified that an
adverse reaction to the jab would be considered “work-related” if the shot was
required for employment.
Then, in late May 2021, OSHA suddenly revoked this guidance,
saying it will not enforce the recording requirement if the injury or fatality
involves the COVID jab, even if required for employment. The nonenforcement
will remain in place through May 2022, at which time the agency will reevaluate
its position.
Why would they remove the requirement to record and report
vaccine injuries incurred as a result of a vaccine mandate? According to OSHA,
the agency is “working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations,” “does
not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19
vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination
efforts.”5,6 As reported by Ogletree Deakins:7
“There is no doubt that
OSHA’s guidance created a disincentive for employers to mandate that their
employees get vaccinated. With a mandatory vaccination policy, the guidance
ensured that employees’ adverse reactions (with arguably little correlation to
actual work-related injuries) could end up on a company’s OSHA recordkeeping
logs — which could, in turn, negatively affect its insurance rates and, in some
industries, its ability to bid for work.”
What Ogletree fails to address is that by not enforcing this
recording requirement for COVID jab injuries, OSHA is intentionally covering up
the ramifications these vaccine mandates might have on employees’ health.
Meanwhile, employers are still required to record and report COVID-19
infections and COVID-19 deaths among their employees.
Federal Employees Get Special Treatment
In related news, federal employees must be fully
“vaccinated” by November 22, 2021, or face the unemployment line. While
coercion of this nature is abhorrent under any circumstance, federal employees
at least get special treatment if they’re injured by the required jab. As
reported by Stacey Lennox for PJ Media:8
“… October 1, 2021, the
Federal Employee’s Compensation Act (FECA) issued a bulletin regarding coverage
for vaccine injuries.9 FECA did not traditionally cover
preventative measures and any resulting illness or injury. As of September 9,
2021, when President Biden announced the federal mandate, adverse reactions to
COVID-19 vaccination are covered.”
As indicated in FECA Bulletin No. 22-01, dated October 1,
2021:10
“… this executive order now
makes COVID-19 vaccination a requirement of most Federal employment. As such,
employees impacted by this mandate who receive required COVID-19 vaccinations
on or after the date of the executive order may be afforded coverage under the
FECA for any adverse reactions to the vaccine itself, and for any injuries
sustained while obtaining the vaccination.”
“This bulletin is an interesting turn of events given
previous OSHA guidance to private employers,” Lennox writes.11 Indeed,
while OSHA is selectively choosing to hide the vaccine injuries of private
employees, federal employees will have access to financial compensation for
their vaccine injuries, over and above the Countermeasures Injury Compensation
Act (CICP).12
Who Will Pay for Private Employees Injured by the Jabs?
On the whole, it’s clear that private employees will be at a
distinct disadvantage in terms of compensation. If their employer requires them
to get the jab to keep their job, and they get injured by it, the only recourse
they have is to file a CICP claim, which is near-impossible to get. By not
requiring companies to record vaccine injuries, it effectively shuts down the
path for an employee to seek worker’s compensation if they’re injured by a
mandated COVID jab.
“While OSHA recordability
does not govern worker’s compensation, after managing both for several
employers, I have never seen a compensable injury that is not OSHA recordable,” Lennox
writes.13
As for CICP, in its 15-year history, it has paid out fewer
than 1 in 10 claims.14,15,16 It also offers rather limited
help, as you first have to exhaust your personal insurance before it kicks in
to pay the difference.
Even if they can get it, CICP awards are likely to be a drop
in the bucket for most people. The average award is $200,000, and compensation
for fatalities are capped at $370,376.17 Meanwhile, you can
easily rack up a $1 million hospital bill if you suffer a serious thrombotic
event.18
“Private sector employees
deserve the same protection as federal employees in the face of mandatory
vaccines. The mandates will put a severe risk between them and their ability to
earn a living for some people ... If employers don’t want the liability, they
should fight the mandate. ~ Stacey Lennox, PJ Media”
Perhaps most egregious of all, it’s your responsibility to
prove your injury was the “direct result of the countermeasure’s administration
based on compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence beyond
mere temporal association.”
In other words, you basically have to prove what the vaccine
developer itself has yet to ascertain, seeing how you are part of their
still-ongoing study. You must also pay for your own legal help and any
professional witnesses you may need to support your claim.
Union Workers Now Have Another Bargaining Chip
The fact that federal workers who are injured by the
mandated COVID jabs will be covered by FICA now gives unionized employees a new
bargaining chip though. As noted by Lennox:19
“Without the OSHA ETS, unions
would have bargained about having a vaccine mandate as a term or condition of
employment at all. Now, unions should still have an opportunity for effects
bargaining to ensure their members are covered if they sustain a vaccine
injury.”
Recordability Guidance Must Be Changed Back
As mentioned earlier, the OSHA requirement to record vaccine
injuries was scrapped because it disincentivized employers to mandate the shot.
Having large numbers of injury reports can raise a company’s insurance costs.
However, if OSHA is now going to require all employers with 100 or more
employees to implement vaccine mandates, then most companies will be in the
same boat.
Since no employer will be at a particular disadvantage, OSHA
really needs to change its recordability guidance back, Lennox says, adding:20
“Private sector employees
deserve the same protection as federal employees in the face of mandatory
vaccines. The mandates will put a severe risk between them and their ability to
earn a living for some people.
If they [employers] cave,
they should be liable just as every taxpayer is now liable for a vaccine injury
to a federal employee. If employers don’t want the liability, they should fight
the mandate.”
“The Truth About
COVID-19” exposes the hidden agenda behind the pandemic, showing the
countermeasures have nothing to do with public health and everything to do with
ushering in a new social and economic system based on totalitarian,
technocracy-led control. So, it’s not misinformation they fear. It’s the truth
they want to prevent from spreading. Pick
up a copy of this best-selling book today before it’s too late. -By Dr. Joseph
Mercola
Disclaimer: The
entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless
otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the
respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this
website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified
health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended
as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of
Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own
health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a
qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking
medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional
before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an
article on your site please click here. This
content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and
information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from
Dr. Mercola is required.
