I first discovered Dr. David Martin from a Telegram Post (I
wish I could remember channel for proper credit) of a Greg Reese video highlighting
Dr. Martin testimony before the International Covid Summit sponsored by European
Parliament on May 3, 2023.
While looking for an intro photo for this post, I ran into a
205-page PDF that Dr. Martin documents his findings which undoubtedly is the
basis of his testimony in the 2023 video. The documentation was posted in 2021
under the title, “The
Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier”.
The University of
Hawaii has a website devoted to Democide with intense research data
presented. What amazes me about University of Hawaii involvement is the State
is a haven for Dem-Marxist politics and the university research focuses on
primarily Communist genocides (of note Nazi & Muslim history is there as
well).
So, going to the University’s Democide front page
offers this short and unsweet definition: “MURDER BY GOVERNMENT”. You
can start there if you want to examine all Democide statistics. There is even a
delving into the site’s opinion on the differences between Democide and Genocide.
But that is another story.
1. (Mass) murder of people by
a government which has power over them.
Usage notes: Despite
its technically narrower meaning, genocide is often used to convey the meaning
meant by democide (i.e. the murder of people irrespective of race, ethnicity
etc.).
The Reese title of his introductory video to Dr. Martin
should now have more meaning so here’s a repost of that Substack title: “David
Martin Exposes Timeline of Biggest Democide in Recorded History”.
Greg Reese adds a link to the full video but it goes to the Banned.Video
platform which does not embed well. I’ll get to the full video, but here’s the
Reese teaser courtesy of Bitchute:
Below the transcript I am cross posting a Youtube version
put together by Peacemonger
the full testimony of Dr. Martin Testimony which is 22:08 in length. AND in
case Youtube censorship shows its ugly face, here’s a Rumble video version
(21:29) of the testimony under the title, “Dr
David Martin opening speech at the INTERNATIONAL COVD SUMMIT pt1 2023”.
AND THEN I’m cross posting three videos (two of which are
lengthy) covering the INTERNATIONAL COVID SUMMIT III. I’m posting all the
testimonies for your benefit of information gained. Feel free to watch when
time permits and go back to it as your interests are piqued or not (FULL
DISCLOSURE: I have not had time to watch all the testimony):
Then last of all, if you happen to get to it. You might want
watch an interview conducted by Jamie Glazov with Larry Cook who fairly persuasive
of anti-vaxx in general as opposed to just anti-mRNA Jab which where I lean
toward: “Vaccines
– and Injuries, Deaths and Death Threats” (48:23).
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin
supplements/products, coffee from my Online store: My Store (please use referral
discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
***********************
The latest video by Greg Reese…Dr. Martin
Exposes Democide Transcript
Dr David Martin was recently a guest at the European Union
and laid out the timeline for the biggest democide in recorded history. You can
see the full video on banned.video. This is my short edit.
DR DAVID MARTIN: Coronavirus was identified in
1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models that could be
used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition.
What’s particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965
was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and
modified for a whole host of reasons.
In 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model was used as a
transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation and in 1967, we did
the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus.
The Common Cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s and
in 1975, 1976 and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by
putting it into different animals; pigs and dogs. And that became the basis for
Pfizer’s first spike protein vaccine patent filed – are you ready for this? –
in 1990.
And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with
vaccines: they didn’t work.
It turns out that coronavirus is a very malleable model. It
transforms and it changes and it mutates over time. As a matter of fact, every
publication on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 until 2018, every single
publication concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse.
In 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
patented – and I quote: “An infectious replication-defective clone of
coronavirus” and that work, patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel
Hill mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year.
In 2005, this particular pathogen was specifically labeled
as a “bioterrorism and bioweapon platform technology and from 2005 onwards, it
was actually a “biowarfare-enabling agent”, its official classification.
We have been lured into believing that EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these
organizations are what we should be pointing to but we’ve been specifically
requested to ignore the facts, that over $10 billion have been funneled through
Black Operations, through the check of Anthony Fauci and a side-by-side ledger
, where NIAID has a balance sheet and next to it is a biodefense balance sheet,
equivalent dollar-for-dollar matching, that no one in the media talks about.
“Poised for human emergence in 2016” at the Proceedings for
the National Academy of Sciences, such that by the time we get to 2017 and
2018, the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community:
“There is going to be an accidental or intentional release
of a respiratory pathogen.” Seven months before the allegation of Patient
Number One, four patent applications at Moderna were modified to include the
term, “Accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen” as the
justification for making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist.
The intent was to get the world to accept a universal
vaccine template and the intent was to use coronavirus to get there. This was
premeditated domestic terrorism stated at the proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences in 2015. Does that sound like a bat and a pangolin went
into a bar in the Wuhan market?
This is an act of biological and chemical warfare
perpetrated on the human race.
The Covid-19 coronavirus was "intentionally
released" by the United States in Wuhan China. This was done with the
target to trigger a global pandemic to raise public acceptance of vaccines.
These claims were made by Doctor David Martin at an
International Covid Summit organized by the European Parliament in Brussels on
May 3rd 2023.
He said the US was responsible for the making of both
coronaviruses causing the outbreaks of SARS in 2003 and the Covid-19 pandemic
in the past three years.
I’ve got some crazy yet relevant info on American (as
in sponsored by the US. Government meaning taxpayer funded) Gain of
Function (GoF) dangerous experimentation shared by Dr. Mercola. THEN some Jab
facts which We The People are being LIED to as in “safe and effective”.
Sheeple need not read because they would rather believe
science liars.
JRH 9/9/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I need your
generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
ØScientists
in the U.S. and Canada have resurrected the Spanish flu virus through reverse
genetics. Not surprisingly, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr.
Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
are involved
ØThe
scientists appear frustrated by the fact that their reverse engineered Spanish
flu virus — even at the highest doses tested — was not lethal enough to kill
the macaque species selected for the experiment. They argue we need to make a
more dangerous version of the Spanish flu to be able to make better vaccines
for it. This despite the fact that, until they resurrected it, it no longer
existed in nature
ØThe
argument that we need to create dangerous viruses “just in case” Nature comes
up with something similar, so we can create vaccines for said viruses in
advance, simply doesn’t hold water. This is science gone mad, and it must be
stopped
ØEvidence
points to SARS-CoV-2 being the product of gain-of-function research, and a number
of U.S. institutions need to come clean about their work, including the
EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), the University of North Carolina (UNC), the
University of California at Davis (UCD), the NIH and the U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID)
ØAll of
these agencies and institutions have conducted and/or collaborated on research
that may be able to solve the mystery of where SARS-CoV-2 came from. But
instead of transparently sharing their data, they’ve merely declared that
they’ve “not been involved in any experiments that could have resulted in the
emergence of SARS-CoV-2.” Blanket denials are no longer enough. They must
produce the data for independent review and analysis
Evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 being the product of
gain-of-function (GoF) research. Indeed, attorney Tom Renz will soon release
the results of a major legal investigation, which he claims will demonstrate —
beyond a reasonable doubt — that SARS-CoV-2 was created as part of a GoF
project.1
Whether the outbreak was accidental, intentional or the
result of negligence, the end result is the same — devastation of health,
commerce, finance and civil life worldwide for years on end.
Now imagine what might happen if something like the Spanish
flu got out — or worse, a turbo-charged, genetically engineered version of it.
Incomprehensible as it may seem to the average person, scientists in the U.S.
and Canada have resurrected this devastatingly lethal virus and, not surprisingly,
the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr. Anthony Fauci's National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) are involved.
Mad Scientists Are Testing Recreated Spanish Flu on
Monkeys
As reported by Renz, August 19, 2022:2
"... this is so absurd that
I am just starting with the reference document because I am concerned no one
will believe it. Here it is: 'Spanish
Flu GoF.'3 Yes, that is right, Fauci and crew are
now actively performing gain-of-function (GoF) work and infecting primates with
the Spanish Flu ... Here is a quote from the document:
'... Influenza virus A/South
Carolina/1918 (H1N1) was generated by reverse genetics and handled in biosafety
level 4 (BSL-4) containment at the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML).
Sequences of the 1918 influenza
viral segments were based on data reported under GenBank accession numbers
DQ208309, DQ208310, DQ208311, AF117241, AY744935, AF250356, AY130766, and
AF333238.
1918 influenza virus was
cultured using Madin-Darby canine kidney ... cells. MDCK cells were grown in
minimum essential medium ... supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum ... and 1
L-glutamine ...
A passage 2 (P2) virus stock was
prepared using MEM supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) ... 1
L-glutamine, and 1 mg/mL N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone
(TPCK)-treated trypsin ...
This stock was used for animal
inoculation. The mouse 50% lethal dose (MLD50) for this stock was determined
previously to be 103.2 PFU; this value was confirmed prior to the use of the
stock for macaque infection.'
I frankly do not care to debate
the nuance of whether the recreation of generally extinct virus 'generated by
reverse genetics' using pieces and parts of other animals qualifies as GoF;
what I care about is that we have recreated the Spanish Flu and are
experimenting with it on other animals."
Spanish Flu 'Not Lethal Enough'
As noted by Renz, the scientists appear frustrated by the
fact that their reverse engineered Spanish flu virus — even at the highest
doses tested — was not lethal enough to kill the two macaque species selected
for the experiment.
Macaques were therefore deemed "not ideal for the
development and testing of novel pandemic influenza-specific vaccines and
therapies," necessitating "other physiologically relevant nonhuman
primate models." Renz continues:4
"... given the result of
the previous coronavirus GoF, can ANYONE possibly argue GoF work on the Spanish
Flu is a good idea? Even the simple recreation of the disease demonstrates an
incredible lack of respect for the disaster created by the coronavirus GoF.
So you may be asking, what moron
could possibly be oblivious enough to support GoF work on the Spanish Flu while
the world is still dealing with the nightmare that is COVID? The answer should
not be surprising ... NIH and NIAID are involved.
Apparently Fauci does not mind
what he did with funding the creation of COVID and is at it again. You might
also note the vaccine development crew's involvement. A foundational point in
this article is that the newly recreated Spanish Flu is not dangerous enough.
Here is a pull-quote:
'However, 1918 influenza was
uniformly nonlethal in these two species, demonstrating that this isolate is
insufficiently pathogenic in rhesus and Mauritian cynomolgus macaques to
support testing novel prophylactic influenza approaches where protection from
severe disease combined with a lethal outcome is desired as a highly stringent
indication of vaccine efficacy.'
This means that these people are
arguing that we need to make a more dangerous version of the Spanish Flu so
they can make 'better' vaccines for it … despite the fact that until they
recreated it, it likely no longer existed in nature."
As noted by Renz, elected officials really need to answer
the question, "Why is this kind of research allowed to continue on your
watch?" Why are we reverse engineering the most lethal viruses the world
has ever seen — after they've already been eradicated?
The argument that we need to create dangerous viruses
"just in case" Nature comes up with something similar, so we can
create vaccines for said viruses in advance, simply doesn't hold water. Stop
creating these monstrosities, and we won't need the vaccines! This is science
gone mad, and it must be stopped.
Besides, what are the chances that a virus would emerge
naturally that just so happens to perfectly match the virus we now have a
vaccine against? The entire premise is irrational from start to finish. It's
biowarfare research and nothing else.
The Intentional Cover-Up of SARS-CoV-2's Origin
Fauci, former NIH chief Dr. Francis Collins, EcoHealth
Alliance president Peter Daszak and other members of the scientific community
have spent the last two and a half years actively stifling debate about the
genesis of SARS-CoV-2.
And, coincidentally, most of them have clear-cut connections
to bat coronavirus GoF research and/or the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV),
which appears to be the lab from which the virus somehow escaped.
So, it appears those who insist SARS-CoV-2 is of natural
origin, despite all the evidence to the contrary, are doing so because they
don't want risky virological research to be blamed for the COVID pandemic. That
would "blow their cover" and raise questions about the sanity of
funding such research.
Some may be so enamored with their chosen careers, they
cannot imagine doing anything other than tinkering with pathogens. For them,
pulled funding is a threat to their livelihood. But for others, the underlying
incentive may be more nefarious. Like I already said, there's really no reason
for this kind of research other than the creation of weapons of mass
destruction.
Whatever incentive any given player may have had, what's
clear is that Fauci, Collins, Daszak and many others intentionally undermined
efforts to get to the bottom of where SARS-CoV-2 came from.
Attesting to this corruption of science is Jeffrey Sachs,
Ph.D., professor of economy at Columbia University, a senior United Nations
adviser and chair of The Lancet COVID-19 Commission, convened in June 2020.
Sachs originally assigned Daszak to lead and organize the
COVID-19 Commission's task force to investigate the virus's genesis (one of 11
task forces under the COVID Commission). Sachs ended up dismissing Daszak from
the task force in June 2021, after he realized just how serious Daszak's
conflicts of interest were,5 and that Daszak was lying to him.6
Eventually, he realized Daszak wasn't the only rotten apple
in the bunch. Other members of The Lancet Commission's COVID Origins task force
were also working against their mandate to investigate the pandemic's origin.
The final straw came when Sachs sacked Daszak and several task force members
suddenly attacked him for being "antiscience."
Shortly thereafter, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
request brought previously hidden NIH documents to light, and Sachs realized
that those who were attacking him also had undisclosed ties that made their
ability to get to the truth doubtful at best. At that point, in September 2021,
he disbanded the whole task force.
Lack of Transparency Breeds Mistrust
In mid-May 2022, Sachs published a frank opinion piece in
the journal PNAS,7 together with Neil Harrison, calling for a
truly independent inquiry into the origin of SARS-CoV-2.
“Much may be gleaned from
information found in U.S.-based research institutions that were working with
Wuhan-based institutions, including the WIV. Yet such material has not been
disclosed for independent analysis.”
In their article, Sachs and Harrison argued that while
transparency on the part of Chinese authorities would be "enormously
helpful," much may be gleaned from information found in U.S.-based research
institutions that were working with Wuhan-based institutions, including the
WIV. Yet such material has not been disclosed for independent analysis. Here's
an excerpt:8
"This lack of an
independent and transparent US-based scientific investigation has had four
highly adverse consequences. First, public trust in the ability of US
scientific institutions to govern the activities of US science in a responsible
manner has been shaken.
Second, the investigation of the
origin of SARS-CoV-2 has become politicized within the US Congress; as a
result, the inception of an independent and transparent investigation has been
obstructed and delayed.
Third, US researchers with deep
knowledge of the possibilities of a laboratory-associated incident have not
been enabled to share their expertise effectively. Fourth, the failure of NIH,
one of the main funders of the US–China collaborative work, to facilitate the
investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2 has fostered distrust regarding US
biodefense research activities.
Much of the work on SARS-like
CoVs performed in Wuhan was part of an active and highly collaborative US–China
scientific research program funded by the US Government (NIH, Defense Threat
Reduction Agency [DTRA], and US Agency for International Development [USAID]),
coordinated by researchers at EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), but involving
researchers at several other US institutions.
For this reason, it is important
that US institutions be transparent about any knowledge of the detailed
activities that were underway in Wuhan and in the United States. The evidence
may also suggest that research institutions in other countries were involved,
and those too should be asked to submit relevant information ..."
Sachs and Harrison go on to name a number of U.S. institutions
that need to come clean about their work, including the EcoHealth Alliance
(EHA), the University of North Carolina (UNC), the University of California at
Davis (UCD), the NIH, NIAID and the U.S. Agency for International Development
(USAID).
All of these agencies and institutions have conducted and/or
collaborated on research that may be able to solve the mystery, but instead of
transparently sharing their data, they've merely declared that they've
"not been involved in any experiments that could have resulted in the
emergence of SARS-CoV-2."
Blanket Denials Are Not Good Enough
As noted by Sachs, before we can believe such claims, we
need to be able to confirm their veracity, and that requires independent
analysis of all the data.
"Blanket denials from the
NIH are no longer good enough. Although the NIH and USAID have strenuously
resisted full disclosure of the details of the EHA-WIV-UNC work program,
several documents leaked to the public or released through the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) have raised concerns," Sachs and Harrison
wrote.9
"These research proposals
make clear that the EHA-WIV-UNC collaboration was involved in the collection of
a large number of so-far undocumented SARS-like viruses and was engaged in
their manipulation within biological safety level (BSL)-2 and BSL-3 laboratory
facilities, raising concerns that an airborne virus might have infected a
laboratory worker.
A variety of scenarios have been
discussed by others, including an infection that involved a natural virus
collected from the field or perhaps an engineered virus manipulated in one of
the laboratories."
Suspicious 'Coincidences' Abound
Sachs and Harrison go on to discuss the problem of an
unusual furin cleavage site (FCS) in SARS-CoV-2 that makes it more
transmissible and pathogenic than related viruses.
While it's not yet known how this feature came to be within
SARS-CoV-2, whether by natural evolution or intentional insertion, "We do
know that the insertion of such FCS sequences into SARS-like viruses was a
specific goal of work proposed by the EHA-WIV-UNC partnership within a 2018
grant proposal ('DEFUSE') that was submitted to the U.S. Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA)," Sachs wrote.
That particular DARPA proposal was never funded, but as
noted by Sachs, "we do not know whether some of the proposed work was
subsequently carried out in 2018 or 2019, perhaps using another source of
funding."
"Information now held by
the research team headed by EHA, as well as the communications of that research
team with US research funding agencies, including NIH, USAID, DARPA, DTRA, and
the Department of Homeland Security, could shed considerable light on the
experiments undertaken by the US-funded research team and on the possible
relationship, if any, between those experiments and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2," Sachs
and Harrison wrote.10
"We do not assert that
laboratory manipulation was involved in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, although
it is apparent that it could have been. However, we do assert that there has
been no independent and transparent scientific scrutiny to date of the full
scope of the US-based evidence."
In an August 2, 2022, Current Affairs interview,11 Sachs
again reiterated that he believes the NIH and allied scientists colluded to
impede The Lancet Commission's investigation, for the simple reason that the
virus was the result of U.S. research.
Sachs also opened up about his concerns and misgivings in an
August 20, 2022, interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (video above). He admits
believing in the zoonotic spillover theory early on, only to, over time, come
to change his mind as he realized he was being lied to, over and over again.
Today, he believes the lab-leak theory is the most likely
explanation for the pandemic — and that the U.S. government, the NIH, the NIAID
and the rest are suppressing the truth for the simple reason that they're
responsible for its creation, even if only in part.
Final Thoughts
To circle back to where we started, is it really prudent to
reverse engineer the Spanish flu virus, and further tinker with it to make it
even more lethal — all in the name of vaccine development?
Think back over the past few years. Mull over the deaths —
an estimated 18 million from COVID-19 alone12 — the suicides
(deaths of despair), the lost businesses, lost education years, the loss of
freedoms and Constitutional rights, the COVID jab injuries, and the massive
wealth transfer that has occurred.
All of that may have been because of this kind of mad
science. Do we really want to repeat it in the future, but with a far more
lethal pathogen? Most sane persons would say no. It's time for legislators to
take definitive steps to ensure mankind is not wiped out by scientific hubris.
My latest book, “The
Truth About COVID-19,” is an instant best-seller. After thousands
of reviews it has a nearly perfect 5-star rating, so grab
your copy today before it’s too late!
Dr.
Kelly Victory, a residency-trained trauma and emergency specialist
with over 30 years of clinical experience, appeared on Ask Dr.
Drew to discuss shocking COVID-19 jab booster data in young adults.
Dr. Victory first explained to Dr. Drew that the
experimental injections have negative efficacy for all age
brackets.
“In all ages, it is negative efficacy. Your risk of
contracting COVID is higher the more vaccinated you are,” Dr. Victory
explained.
She noted what’s still unknown is the effects the shots have
on overall immunity.
Dr. Victory later discussed a new study that looked at, for
the first time that she’s aware of, the risk-benefit calculation for 18-29
year-olds in regards to COVID-19 boosters.
It addressed the ethical issue of ongoing COVID-19 jab
mandates for school and the military.
“That study showed that for every 1 hospitalization that is
avoided in an 18-29 year-old, you could anticipate based on CDC data anywhere
from 18-98 serious adverse events,” Dr. Victory stated.
“A serious adverse event in this study was defined as
something that resulted in death, near death, hospitalization, or permanent
disability.”
Dr. Kelly Victory is a residency-trained
trauma and emergency specialist with over 30 years of clinical experience. She
is an expert in disaster preparedness and response and medical management of
mass casualties. Dr. Victory is an alumnus of the National Preparedness
Leadership Initiative by the Harvard School of Public Health and the Kennedy
School of Government to develop “meta-leaders” for national disaster
preparedness and response, and served as a member of the Leadership Council at
Harvard School of Public Health for many years. Dr. Victory has worked with a
range of public and private organizations including companies, hospitals,
schools, churches and municipalities on public health issues including disaster
and pandemic preparedness and response.
Dr. Victory teaches “Active Shooter
Rapid Response and Extraction” and “Leadership in Times of Crisis” for first
responders, community leaders and organizations, aimed at limiting casualties,
improving outcomes, enhancing resiliency and coordinating emergency response
efforts. Dr. Victory has been a consistent and vocal proponent of aggressive
early outpatient treatment for COVID-19, as well as a cautious and informed,
risk-based approach to COVID vaccination. She makes frequent radio and
television appearances to discuss issues of public health, disasters, and
preparedness and response efforts, and has been the daily voice of “The Doctor
Hour” on KABC in Los Angeles throughout the pandemic. Dr. Victory holds a BS
from Duke University, earned her MD from the University of North Carolina and
completed her residency in Emergency Medicine and Trauma at Carolinas Medical
Center.
·Bombay High Court took cognizance and issued
notice in a vaccine murder case of Dr. Snehal Lunawat where interim
compensation of Rs. 1000 crores ($126 million approx.) is sought.
·Advocate for Bill Gates appeared before the High
Court and accepted the notice from High Court.
·Central Government has given the Enquiry Report
certificate that the death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat was due to side effects of
covishield [aka AstraZeneca] vaccine.
·Petition also prays for action against social
media like Facebook, YouTube, Google and main stream media who are running
false narrative & conspiracy theories that vaccines are completely safe and
are suppressing the news and information regarding side effects, inefficacy or
failure of vaccines.
·Notice is also issued to Dr. V. G. Somani – Drug
Controller General of India and Dr. Randeep Guleria, the former Director of
AIIMS who were running the false narratives that vaccines are completely safe.
·Supreme Court also issued notice to Central
Government in vaccine deaths of two children from Hyderabad &Tamilnadu.
·Kerala High Court also asked Central Government
to file reply affidavit in vaccine death of Nova Sabu& others.
·Central Government has informed the High Court
that they are formulating guidelines for giving compensation to victims of
vaccine side effects and resultant deaths.
1) Division Bench of Bombay High Court
Comprising Justice Gangapurwala & Justice Madhav Jamdar had took cognizance
on 26.08.2022 of the petition filed by Shri Dilip Lunawat, who is
the father of deceased Dr. Snehal Lunawat, who passed away due to side effects
of covishield vaccine. [Writ Petition No. 5767 of 2022 Dilip Lunawat Vs.
Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. &Ors.]
