Two Likeable Guys that Disagree
John R.
Houk
© April 18,
2019
Below is a relatively even-handed criticism of Justin
Smith and my thoughts on Julian Assange being more a scoundrel than a hero. The
Commenter goes by the pseudonym “Southwest” and the comments are derived from
Groups on the USA Life Social
Platform (incidentally to those
interested, USA Life is extremely similar to Facebook yet so far –
without the Left-Wing censorship used so wickedly on Facebook).
So for some full disclosure. I am quite the fan of Justin Smith. Also I
was developing into a fan of Southwest. Unfortunately Southwest is a bit harsh
(though respectful) of Justin’s
perspective. AND knowing Justin, I suspect he’d be critical of many of
Southwest’s assertions. The irony is, it is my sense the two are formed from
the same metal of conviction and probably have more in common than not. The two
just happen to disagree on some particulars.
Just for the sake of summary, Justin’s position (and to a large extent –
my position) is Julian Assange’s indiscriminate publication of transgendered
Manning’s purloined Classified data – mixing together both information
that needed exposed along with information that risked exposing individuals to
physical harm – makes Assange a scoundrel.
Southwest’s stand is a publisher has a right to publish comparable to say
the questionable content of the New York
Times. At this point I concur with Southwest UNLESS in some fashion Julian Assange
was actively involved in the purloining of Classified data as in the now
infamous word – collusion to commit a crime. AND either way – simple publisher
or colluding criminal – Assange is a scoundrel for grouping people placed in
harm’s way with infamous potentially war crime actions.
On the issue of DNC/Podesta email hack, if the data was dropped in his
lap he should not be prosecuted for those publications exposing at the infamous
character of Crooked Hillary and her Dem operatives.
It is my suspicion Justin and Southwest disagree on how Assange acquired
the DNC/Podesta emails. It seems the majority opinion is the Russians did a
hack and provided the data to Assange. I know that Assange vehemently denies a
Russian connection.
Southwest makes a strong case that the DNC data came from a combination
of Gucifer 2 and Seth Rich. Rich was murdered under suspicious circumstances
with all the markings of a coverup. Adding to the mystery is Assange offered a
reward for info on Rich’s murder adding to the suspicion Rich acted as a
whistleblower by providing purloined emails to Assange. BUT to my knowledge,
Assange has never confirmed a Seth Rich connection.
On a personal level, I lean to Seth Rich purloining DNC data and being
murdered for it. I think but cannot say for certainty, that Justin Smith does
not accept the Seth Rich connection to the exposed DNC/Podesta emails.
Whoever is correct, I’m not going to lose any sleep over it. My interests
lay with the obvious culprits in the Dem Party – in and out of government
authority – be investigated or re-investigated for crimes against Donald Trump
prior AND after the 2016 election.
IF ASSANGE has anything to do with inspiring or speeding along that
investigation, scoundrel though he is in my book, needs either immunity or a
pardon or both for potential crimes he committed within the U.S. jurisdiction
of law.
YOU ARE GOING TO WANT TO READ Southwest’s position below. I’ll let you the
reader corroborate or disprove his (or could it be her?) assertions – I have
decided to not get in the middle of two bloggers whom I tend to both like. And
Justin, don’t get to cranky with Southwest harshness. Like I said, it is my
sense you guys are stamped from the same metal.
JRH 4/18/19
*******************
USA Life Group Patriots_For_Trump
Posted 4/17/19
John Houk I do respect
the fact that you are an honest seeker and because of that I'll comment on the
post. I took the time to read it in its entirety.
It is not that Water Gate papers and tapes did not
compromise security, the fact is that it exposed the party that was not in
favor of the deep state.
That is point number one which applies to all of the 'leaks'
and publications the author refers to and
2) When the government becomes the enemy of the people , it
needs to be exposed. No national security concept should cover up to the fact
that NSA has been paid millions if not billions of dollars --and this is
indisputably and proven-- to Google and had set up an scheme during the Obama
administration--just look at the records of their visit to the Obama White
House and remember that Obama was a scammer and didn't even record all the
visits--it is staggering- to spy on people and to help to remove the president
of the US without due process but through slander and fake news media and
democrat operatives working in the shadow.
3) All publishers should be protected ...no one endangered
national security more than the New York
times but they were working for the shadow government and it was okay.
4) The crimes reported by Seth Rich via Hillary/Podesta
emails need to be brought to light. To this day the so called 'elite' drink the
blood of children they kill (this is another article that I don't have time to
explore here but this is proven fact the substance they get during the
torturing of children that sips in their blood is what prolong their lives
notice that they live to be over 100 years old?
Please save this post John. When people start splitting
words for content and this is what Justin Smith does and it is very appealing
for people like me and you because it forces your mind to reason and we may be
addicted to reasoning the problem with that is that the main point is lost.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH HAS TO REMAIN FREE! If we split words to
justify Assange imprisonment, then we will go down the path Hitler used to stop
people from telling the truth.
Mueller and NSA cohorts and Google needs to go to prison,
not Assange for telling on them. Noticed that no one is talking about the
killing of children after molesting them and drinking their blood? Does it
sound like legal or normal or decent? No, they talk about Assange who ONLY
PUBLISHED what Seth Rich did And no one is talking about the hit job done by
Hillary through the FBI to kill Seth Rich who went to the FBI to ask protection
from Hillary and got killed by a weapon from the FBI who says that the weapon
was stolen from their car when they went to meet Seth Rich.
Does it look like a set up to you? Does the FBI need to be
investigated or Julian Assange? To be honest, no one can receive wisdom except
from God. Intelligence is not enough, power to be argumentative is not enough
and Justin Smith is lacking this wisdom that comes from God.
His articles are interesting but without wisdom he is a
blind man leading the blind. I won't read any article from this man again
because I know where he is coming from, he is trying to sort things out by
rational without having a moral compass and that doesn't work.
+++++++++++++++
John Houk - We are supportive because we know who placed the
Gucifer 2, NSA and FBI. And we know who leaked the emails: Seth Rich. How do we
know? I hope I’m not repeating this too much--this was a fat file and the forensics
can determine and has determined that, meaning it was a physical transfer such
as a USB or drive, so there was no break into the DNC computer.
Afraid of Hillary, Seth Rich contacted the FBI, as you may
know Washington pays residents of certain areas to have a camera. Let me say
this more accurately, Washington reimburses people who install cameras. Consequently
everybody has a camera in that area and often two.
The camera that filmed the shooting of Seth Rich was
removed, clean[ed] up. [An or The] Attorney sued the police to get a copy, to
no avail. The FBI got some weapon stolen from the car ... the same weapon that
killed Seth Rich. The story doesn't end there. It is long and I'll leave it for
another time.
Just one more thing: the internist that took care of the
shot behind Seth Rich's neck said it was not lethal and he would survive. He
posted on Facebook that something strange had happened, a bunch of FBI agents
came over and told the internist to leave the room and not to come back until
he was told. So, he obeyed, not knowing who Seth Rich was, he posted the story
Facebook that when he came back the man was dead.
When he found out the man worked for the DNC he removed the
post, which other people have photographed. Nowadays the connection with DNC
and Democrats may be a death sentence, unless you do as they please ... You
remember what happened with the Judge against illegal immigration? His body
washed on the shore and many other Bill and Hillary assassinations. But not
everybody in the FBI is corrupted, just the Elite on the 7th floor.
And no one can blame Assange for that. Why they don't prosecute
the New York Times because it is
doing their bidding and because it is against our laws to sue publishers.
______________________
Southwest vs Justin Smith
Two Likeable Guys that Disagree
John R. Houk
© April 18, 2019
__________________
Southwest Comment to ‘Thanks to Justin Smith, More Thoughts on
Assange’
Edited by John R. Houk
