I found a video exposing Crooked Hillary. It’s a bit of a
documentary being 1:35:23 long. It was posted by James Red Pills America on
November 10, but footage shows noted people much younger than they are now.
Nevertheless, with rumors the wicked woman is thinking of entering the Dem
Party fray, it is good to go over the reasons the States dominating the
Electoral College rejected her Presidency in 2016. A 2016 election she tried to
cheat her to victory then blaming the very Russians/Ukrainians she employed to
cheat for losing.
Blog Editor: Rather than
capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post
and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship
tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false
accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat
censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you
belong to.
EXPLOSIVE DOCUMENTARY! Hillary: The Movie is a political
documentary about past United States Senator and failed presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton. It was produced by the conservative non-profit organization Citizens
United. The producers went to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
to get a declaration that they could show this movie. This case was titled
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and its final decision at the
U.S. Supreme Court resulted in a major change in campaign finance law.
The documentary interviewed various conservative figures
such as Dick Morris and Ann Coulter and reviewed various scandals in which
Hillary Clinton participated, such as the White House travel office controversy,
White House FBI files controversy, Whitewater
controversy, and cattle futures controversy.
The factual finding of the three-judge district court was
that there was "no reasonable interpretation [of the movie] other than as
an appeal to vote against Clinton", thus making it "electioneering
communication".
The Supreme Court did not change that decision, but applied
the strict scrutiny test for the First Amendment of the Constitution and said
corporations could not be banned from making electioneering communications.
Join me, #PastorJames of James Red Pills
America, as we #RedPill the entire world with this
one!
Blog Editor: Rather than
capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post
and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship
tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false
accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat
censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you
belong to.
It’s time to play connect the dots with the real collusion
story the Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) will not do for you. The fear I have
is that the GOP elitists are so into maintaining a swamp status quo, that they
will not follow through in decriminalizing the U.S. Federal Government. So
check out these dots and tell me where they lead.
A former adviser to President
Bill Clinton says there is a secret war room, run by the staff of former
President Obama, miles from the White House that is designed to bring down
President Donald Trump.
In a YouTube video shared on
Thursday, Dick Morris, who worked for former President Clinton, said, “there is
indication that Obama has set up a secret operation in a war room just about 2
miles from the White House.” The staff consists of former Barack and
Michelle Obama aides among others, and has two conference calls daily to create
talking points against the president, held at 8:30 am and 9:45 am, according to
Morris.
Rogue
Spooks: The Secret Intelligence Plot to Destroy Donald Trump http://amzn.to/2pQ13El
This is a mirror channel, the official channel of Dick Morris is here https://www.youtube.com/user/dickmorrisreportsplease
subscribe to Dick Morris, click the bell, to receive notifications when he goes
live
On the call are Andrew
Slavitt, who served as the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services and former Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, who also headed Health and
Human Services, as saving Obamacare is of paramount concern.
“There operation is just a
few blocks from the Capitol and it’s in a war room run by Leslie Dash, one of
(former President) Obama’s top health care officials. Coordinating a nationwide
anti-repeal campaign by liberal think tanks, local resistance groups —
sympathetic governors, Medicaid insurance lobbyists, Democratic activists,
pollsters and academics. It was conceived in the hours after (President) Trump
was elected in November and the group called itself Protect Our Care,” Morris
said.
“The covert part of the
resistance in these moles who are buried in the Trump administration who are
leaking to sabotage (President) Trump,” he added.
In March it was reported that former
top aide to President Obama, Valerie Jarrett, was moving in with the Obama
family as part of an operation to resist President Trump.
According to the rumors,
Jarrett and Michelle Obama were creating a “nerve center” to figure out ways to
remove President Trump from office, either by forcing him to resign or having
him impeached.
Morris expounded on that idea
on Sunday when he appeared on New York AM 970’s “The Cats Roundtable,” with
host John Catsimatidis, a former candidate for mayor of New York City.
“The main thing that is going
on, though, in politics is really an attempt at a coup d’etat, which is
essentially what this whole Russian stuff is,” Morris told Catsimatidis. “In
fact, I call it the illusion of collusion. The whole Democratic party is so
taken up with the idea that Hillary [Clinton] lost the election because of
collusion between Trump and [Vladimir] Putin.”
“I think the whole thing has
been cooked up in an effort to topple Trump from power,” he said. “It amounts
really to a coup d’etat between the intelligence community on the one hand and
the media on the other.”
Democratic Rep. Debbie
Wasserman Schultz seemingly planned to pay cyber-probe suspect and IT aide
Imran Awan even while he was living in Pakistan, if the FBI hadn’t stopped
him from leaving the U.S. Monday. Public statements and congressional payroll
records suggest she also appears to have known that his wife, a fellow IT
staffer, left the country for good months ago — while she was also a criminal
suspect.
In all, six months of
actions reveal a decision to continue paying a man who seemingly
could not have been providing services to her, and who a mountain of evidence
suggests was a liability. The man long had access to all of Wasserman
Schultz’s computer files, work emails and personal emails, and he was
recently accused by a relative in court documents of wiretapping
and extortion.
Records also raise questions
about whether the Florida Democrat permitted Awan to continue to access
computers after House-wide authorities banned him from the
network Feb. 2. Not only did she keep him on staff
after the ban, but she also did not have any other IT person to
perform necessary work that presumably would have arisen during a months-long
period, according to payroll records.
Wasserman Schultz employed
Pakistani-born Awan and his wife Hina Alvi, and refused to fire either of
them even after U.S. Capitol Police said in February 2017 that they were
targets of the criminal investigation. She said police wouldn’t show her
evidence against the couple and, without it, she assumed they might be victims
of anti-Muslim profiling.
Awan booked a round-trip
ticket to Pakistan in July and planned to depart Monday, July 24 with a return
ticket in six months. He was arrested at Dulles
Airport during his attempt to leave.
The Associated Press reported
that Awan’s lawyer, Chris Gowen, said Awan “had informed the House of
his plans to visit his family.”
Wasserman Schultz’s spokesman
cited Awan’s Monday arrest as the reason for ending his employment
on Tuesday: “Upon learning of his arrest, he was terminated.”
The office’s insistence
that his termination was prompted by the Monday arrest — and not the House
Sergeant at Arms banning him and his wife from touching congressional computers
or his six months in Pakistan — suggests that had he boarded the flight
without incident he would still be on payroll.
“Does that mean if he had
boarded the flight as planned the office would have been paying him for six
months while he was abroad?” The DCNF investigative group asked Wasserman
Schultz’s spokesman Thursday. “Why would it do that?” The spokesman did
not respond.
Awan’s wife, Hina, left the
country under similar circumstances March 5, after withdrawing the couple’s
three kids from school without telling Virginia education officials, packing up
all of her possessions, and hiding $12,000 in cash, according to an FBI affidavit.
She allegedly had hundreds of thousands of dollars waiting in Pakistan for
her — money the FBI says Awan had obtained partly through mortgage fraud
and had wired overseas using a false explanation.
Two days later, on March 7,
House records show Hina was cut from Wasserman Schultz’s payroll.
Though Hina bought a round
trip ticket with a return in six months, the FBI said it “does not believe that
Alvi has any intention to return to the United States.”
Wasserman Schultz spokesman
David Darmrom did not respond to a DCNF IG request to explain why Hina had
been terminated two days into a trip she claimed was temporary, while her
husband had not been terminated for a six-month move. Between the
part-time nature of her work and the ban, her absence was unlikely
to have been noticed in two days without someone telling the office her
plans.
Wasserman Schultz’s office
also didn’t answer if the office knew Hina’s “round trip” was a permanent
move.
Hina and Awan were both
IT aides whose jobs required access to the network, but the House
Sergeant-At-Arms banned them from accessing it beginning Feb. 2.
Awan and Hina were her only IT staffers, and payroll records through the latest available period,
March 31, indicate that no other IT staffer or vendor was added to the payroll
after their ban.
A House source said
Awan was seen in the House office building multiple times after the
network ban. “Imran Awan is working in an “advisory” role for Wasserman
Schultz, her spokesman said, “providing advice on technology issues.”
The spokesman wouldn’t say
who did the office’s computer work after the ban, if not Awan.
As IT administrators, the
suspects could read all emails sent and received by the lawmaker and see all
files on the staff members’ computers, numerous House IT aides said. WikiLeaks
shows that Awan also had the password to
Wasserman Schultz’s iPad.
In public court documents
filed in Fairfax, Va., Awan’s stepmother accused him of wiretapping and
extortion. “Imran Awan did admit to me that my phone is tapped
and there are devices installed in my house” and “Imran Awan threatened that he
is very powerful and if I ever call the police again, [he] will … kidnap my family members back in Pakistan,” his stepmother, Samina Gilani, claimed in thedocuments (p.
21) filed April 14.
Despite her
professed concern of stereotyping, all other colleagues who employed Awan,
Hina or their other relatives on House payrolls fired them, including Rep.
Andre Carson of Indiana, who is Muslim and has criticized Wasserman Schultz for
blocking police from examining a laptop tied to Imran.
That laptop was found in an
unused crevice of a House office building and seized as evidence by the Capitol
Police, but Wasserman Schultz appeared determined to not let police see its
contents, threatening “consequences”
for the police chief if he didn’t release it. The exchange was captured on
video.
Fox News reported that months
later, she had blocked them from looking at it but had become open to “negotiating” with
police, possibly turning over certain files, as Hillary Clinton was
permitted to do in deciding which emails were “personal.”
Observers have decried Wasserman
Schultz’s judgment and cybersecurity record, noting she was the chairwoman of
the Democratic National Committee when it was hacked. A group of Democratic
donors filed a lawsuit saying she and the DNC “breached the duties they
owed to… members of the DNC Donor Class byfailing to exercise
reasonable care and
implement adequate [cyber]security protocols..”
In Washington, it’s
never about what they tell you it’s about. So take this to the bank: The case
of Imran Awan, Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s mysterious Pakistani IT guy, is not
about bank fraud.
Yet bank fraud was the
stated charge on which Awan was arrested at Dulles Airport this week, just as
he was trying to flee the United States for Pakistan, via Qatar. That is the
same route taken by Awan’s wife, Hina Alvi, in March, when she suddenly fled
the country, with three young daughters she yanked out of school, mega-luggage,
and $12,400 in cash.
By then, the proceeds of the
fraudulent $165,000 loan they’d gotten from the Congressional Federal Credit
Union had been sent ahead. It was part of a $283,000 transfer that Awan managed
to wire from Capitol Hill. He pulled it off — hilariously, if infuriatingly —
by pretending to be his wife in a phone call with the credit union. Told that
his proffered reason for the transfer (“funeral arrangements”) wouldn’t fly, “Mrs.”
Awan promptly repurposed: Now “she” was “buying property.” Asking no more
questions, the credit union wired the money . . . to Pakistan.
As you let all that sink in,
consider this: Awan and his family cabal of fraudsters had access for years to
the e-mails and other electronic files of members of the House’s Intelligence
and Foreign Affairs Committees. It turns out they were accessing members’
computers without their knowledge, transferring files to remote servers,
and stealing computer equipment — including hard drives that Awan & Co.
smashed to bits of bytes before making tracks.
They were fired in February.
All except Awan, that is. He continued in the employ of Wasserman Schultz, the
Florida Democrat, former DNC chairwoman, and Clinton crony. She kept him in
place at the United States Congress right up until he was nabbed at the airport
on Monday.
This is not about bank fraud.
The Awan family swindles are plentiful, but they are just window-dressing. This
appears to be a real conspiracy, aimed at undermining American national
security.
At the time of his arrest,
the 37-year-old Imran Awan had been working for Democrats as an information
technologist for 13 years. He started out with Representative Gregory Meeks
(D., N.Y.) in 2004. The next year, he landed on the staff of Wasserman Schultz,
who had just been elected to the House.
Congressional-staff salaries
are modest, in the $40,000 range. For some reason, Awan was paid about four
times as much. He also managed to get his wife, Alvi, on the House
payroll . . . then his brother, Abid
Awan . . . then Abid’s wife, Natalia Sova. The youngest of
the clan, Awan’s brother Jamal, came on board in 2014 — the then-20-year-old
commanding an annual salary of $160,000.
A few of these arrangements
appear to have been sinecures: While some Awans were rarely seen around the
office, we now know they were engaged in extensive financial shenanigans away
from the Capitol. Nevertheless, the Daily Caller’s Luke Rosiak, who has
been all over this story, reports that, for their IT
“work,” the Pakistani family has reeled in $4 million from U.S. taxpayers since
2009.
That’s just the “legit”
dough. The family business evidently dabbles in procurement fraud, too. The
Capitol Police and FBI are exploring widespread double-billing for computers,
other communication devices, and related equipment.
Why were they paid so much
for doing so little? Intriguing as it is, that’s a side issue. A more pressing
question is: Why were they given access to highly sensitive government information?
Ordinarily, that requires a security clearance, awarded only after a background
check that peruses ties to foreign countries, associations with unsavory
characters, and vulnerability to blackmail.
These characters could not
possibly have qualified. Never mind access; it’s hard to fathom how they
retained their jobs. The Daily Caller has also discovered that the family,
which controlled several properties, was involved in various suspicious
mortgage transfers. Abid Awan, while working “full-time” in Congress, ran a
curious auto-retail business called “Cars International A” (yes, CIA), through
which he was accused of stealing money and merchandise. In 2012, he discharged
debts in bankruptcy (while scheming to keep his real-estate holdings).
Congressional Democrats hired Abid despite his drunk-driving conviction a month
before he started at the House, and they retained him despite his
public-drunkenness arrest a month after. Beyond that, he and Imran both
committed sundry vehicular offenses. In civil lawsuits, they are accused of
life-insurance fraud.
Democrats now say that any
access to sensitive information was “unauthorized.” But how hard could it have
been to get “unauthorized” access when House Intelligence Committee Dems wanted
their staffers to have unbounded access? In 2016, they wrote a letter to an appropriations subcommittee seeking
funding so their staffers could obtain “Top Secret — Sensitive Compartmented
Information” clearances. TS/SCI is the highest-level security classification.
Awan family members were working for a number of the letter’s signatories.
Democratic members, of
course, would not make such a request without coordination with leadership. Did
I mention that the ranking member on the appropriations subcommittee to whom
the letter was addressed was Debbie Wasserman Schultz?
Why has the investigation
taken so long? Why so little enforcement action until this week? Why, most of
all, were Wasserman Schultz and her fellow Democrats so indulgent of the Awans?
The probe began in late 2016.
In short order, the Awans clearly knew they were hot numbers. They started
arranging the fraudulent credit-union loan in December, and the $283,000 wire
transfer occurred on January 18. In early February, House security services
informed representatives that the Awans were suspects in a criminal investigation.
At some point, investigators found stolen equipment stashed in the Rayburn House Office
Building, including a laptop that appears to belong to Wasserman
Schultz and that Imran was using. Although the Awans were banned from the
Capitol computer network, not only did Wasserman Schultz keep Imran on staff
for several additional months, but Meeks retained Alvi until February 28 — five
days before she skedaddled to Lahore.
Strange thing about that: On
March 5, the FBI (along with the Capitol Police) got to Dulles Airport in time
to stop Alvi before she embarked. It was discovered that she was carrying
$12,400 in cash. As I pointed out this week, it is a felony to export more than $10,000 in
currency from the U.S. without filing a currency transportation
report. It seems certain that Alvi did not file one: In connection with her
husband’s arrest this week, the FBI submitted to the court a complaint affidavit that
describes Alvi’s flight but makes no mention of a currency transportation
report. Yet far from making an arrest, agents permitted her to board the
plane and leave the country, notwithstanding their stated belief that she has
no intention of returning.
Many congressional staffers
are convinced that they’d long ago have been in handcuffs if they pulled what
the Awans are suspected of. Nevertheless, no arrests were made when the scandal
became public in February. For months, Imran has been strolling around the
Capitol. In the interim, Wasserman Schultz has been battling investigators:
demanding the return of her laptop, invoking a constitutional privilege (under
the speech-and-debate clause) to impede agents from searching it, and
threatening the Capitol Police with “consequences” if they don’t relent. Only
last week, according to Fox News, did she
finally signal willingness to drop objections to a scan of the laptop by
federal investigators. Her stridency in obstructing the investigation has been
jarring.
As evidence has mounted, the
scores of Democrats for whom the Awans worked have expressed no alarm. Instead,
we’ve heard slanderous suspicions that the investigation is a product of — all
together now — “Islamophobia.” But Samina Gilani, the Awan brothers’
stepmother, begs to differ. Gilani complained to Virginia police
that the Awans secretly bugged her home and then used the recordings to
blackmail her. She averred in court documents that she was pressured to
surrender cash she had stored in Pakistan. Imran claimed to be “very powerful”
— so powerful he could order her family members kidnapped.
We don’t know if these
allegations are true, but they are disturbing. The Awans have had the
opportunity to acquire communications and other information that could prove
embarrassing, or worse, especially for the pols who hired them. Did the
swindling staffers compromise members of Congress? Does blackmail explain why
were they able to go unscathed for so long?
And as for that sensitive
information, did the Awans send American secrets, along with those hundreds of
thousands of American dollars, to Pakistan?
This is no run-of-the-mill
bank-fraud case.
+++
Imran Awan Becomes Suspect
In Seth Rich Murder Inquiry
Imran Awan, the former DNC
staffer who was arrested this week while trying to flee the United States, was
with Seth Rich the night of his murder, according to new photographic
evidence.
Police
who originally investigated the murder suggested that Seth Rich might have been
killed by someone he knew, due to the lack of struggle. The killer also took
nothing from the victim, leaving behind his wallet containing $2000, watch and
phone.
The
photo, which directly links Imran Awan to Seth Rich, also links Debbie
Wasserman Schultz, Awan’s former employer, to the former Seth Rich’s death.
Awan,
who was kept on the DNC payroll for months and received several payments from
Wasserman Schultz, was arrested earlier this week at Dulles airport. while
trying to flee the United States and return to his native Pakistan.
Earlier
this week WND reported that Seth Rich attended a party with
Washington D.C. IT workers the night of his death, and that Rod Wheeler, the
detective investigating the murder, was determined to learn more about who
attended the party:
During
the course of his investigation of Rich’s murder, Wheeler says learned
something peculiar that he hadn’t heard before: Rich attended a party with
numerous IT workers the night he was killed. After the party, Rich went to
Lou’s City Bar, the last known location where he was seen before his murder.
Wheeler
said he was determined to learn more about the IT party and who was in
attendance, but all his questions have gone unanswered.
“Seth attended that party, and I wanted to know
who else was at that party. But I could never find out,” Wheeler
said. “When I went back to ask other people who should have known who
was at that party – these were people who were close to Seth – they told me,
‘You don’t need to know who was at that party because it had nothing to do with
his death.’”
Uncovering
more details about the attendees of the party is essential in the Rich homicide
investigation, Wheeler contends.
“He was at the party before he went to the bar.
What you do in a murder investigation is you work backward. You want to trace
the victim’s steps as far back as you can – who was that person around the day
before? – as far back as you can,” he said.
“What was interesting is when I am told as an
investigator that I don’t need to talk to people who were at the party. It
makes you wonder why.”
Now
that we know Imran Awan was at the party, Rod Wheeler’s statement has become
even more interesting.
Federal
agents arrested Awan, the IT aide of Wasserman Schultz and the top suspect in a
major Democratic hacking scandal, at Dulles Airport in Virginia as he tried to
flee the U.S. and fly to the Mideast.
WND report: Awan’s arrest came just
one day after reports emerged that the FBI had seized numerous “smashed hard
drives” and other computer equipment from Awan’s previous residence. The
former House IT staffer is suspected of stealing sensitive information from the
office computers of numerous Democratic Party lawmakers and sending that data
to a secret server.
Awan
and his family members, all of whom worked as IT professionals for members of
Congress, were banned from the House network Feb. 2, 2017, by the House
Sergeant at Arms.
Despite
the rapidly escalating scandal that potentially involves multiple federal
crimes, Awan had been kept on the payroll of former DNC Chairwoman Debbie
Wasserman Schultz, who circumvented the ban by having him “advise” her office.
In
the wake of WikiLeaks posting damaging internal emails during the 2016
election, Wasserman Schultz resigned from her post as DNC chairwoman and blamed
the scandal on an alleged hacking by Russians.
After
the emails became public, Donna Brazile, who served as interim DNC chairwoman
following Wasserman Schultz’s resignation, initially claimed the messages were
fabricated. Then she alleged Russians stole the emails.
The
FBI requested access to the DNC’s server to determine who was responsible for
the breach. According to former FBI Director James Comey, the DNC refused to
grant access to its server.
Awan
reportedly possessed the password to the iPad Wasserman Schultz used when the
DNC emails were provided to WikiLeaks.
Meanwhile,
some have speculated that Rich – who worked in the voter analysis division of
the DNC and was brutally murdered on July 10, 2016, on a street near his
Washington home – was an inside source who leaked party insider emails to
WikiLeaks during the 2016 presidential race.
“Well, now you have a possible suspect. Here’s
the corrupt IT guy standing on the shoulders of Debbie Wasserman Schultz
arrested at the airport trying to flee, charged with stealing hundreds of
thousands, maybe millions, of dollars,” said Rivera.
“What if he was the source to WikiLeaks? He has
all the passwords. He has all the information. This is a huge story …
Everyone assumed it was the Russians who hacked the DNC and then gave WikiLeaks
the emails,”
said Rivera.
For
a long time people thought that Seth Rich was the person who leaked information
to Wikileaks. Seth Rich was then murdered in a mysterious ‘botched robbery’ in
which nothing was stolen.
“[Wikileaks’ Founder] Assange told me personally
five times that it wasn’t a state or Russia,” said Hannity.
“If you can prove disgruntled Democrats were the
leakers and not the Russians, as Julian Assange has said … doesn’t that
blow the whole thing out of the water?” said Hannity.
Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at
the National Review Institute and a contributing editor of National
Review.
_______________
Imran Awan Becomes Suspect In Seth Rich Murder Inquiry
Baxter Dmitryis a writer at Your News Wire. He covers politics, business and
entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has
travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live
without fear.
My fellow Conservative Republicans, the finality of Election 2010 is a mere few days away on November 2. You will be inundated with TV and Radio ads; political phone calls; political Newspaper and Magazine ads and of course the ever ubiquitous Internet. Along with these ads there will be pleas for donations for the cause of Conservative candidates to finance those political ads. Be sure to choose a candidate or Political Action Committee (PAC) in which the waning days of the 2010 election cycle will benefit the best.
I believe I found a good PAC to support. This one appears to be associated with Dick Morris or at least Morris was a spokesman. Check this out: Super PAC for America has a very laudable goal. That goal is called Project 100. The essence of the goal is to win 100 Congressional seats on November 2, 2010.
Achievement of fund raising goal at the time of this post: “$4,892,788”.
An Urgent Message
From the Desk of Dick Morris
We Are Approaching a Defining Moment in Our Nation's History . . .
The Decisions Made in the Days Ahead May Determine Whether Our Country Triumphantly Returns to Greatness or Staggers Closer to Collapse . . .
Your Help and Your Voice are Needed to . . .
Reclaim, Rebuild,
and Restore
Our America!
Join Your Fellow Americans to Usher in a Brighter Future for Our Nation!
Dear Fellow American:
Over the last couple of years, America has been bruised and battered.
Our $13.5 trillion federal deficit has pushed our nation to the verge of bankruptcy.
Obamacare has threatened our right to live a long and healthy life.
And the end of the Bush tax cuts, combined with drastic federal and state tax hikes, have put your wealth and retirement savings at risk.
Barack Obama's liberal agenda and "Big Government" initiatives are directly attacking the freedom, safety, and prosperity of every American.
But now is not the time to give up. Now is the time to stand up.
In these moments I'd like to remind you of the immortal words of President Ronald Reagan from his now famous 1980 Republican Convention acceptance speech:
For those who have abandoned hope, we'll restore hope and we'll welcome them into a great national crusade to make America great again!
You see, the bell hasn't rung. A knockout punch was not delivered.
We are the nation of Washington, Lincoln, and Reagan. We stand for freedom, prosperity, and independence.
And it's time we take America back.
With your help we can stand up with pride . . . dust ourselves off . . . and rebuild our nation into one that our Founding Fathers would be proud of.
America is at a Historic Crossroads.
The decisions made by not only you, but your friends, family, and neighbors on November 2 will determine the path of our nation and its future 10, 20 — even 100 years from today.
We cannot be silent. We cannot rest on our laurels.
And we certainly cannot assume that we will reclaim our nation at the voting booths — without taking necessary measures to make it a reality.
The Democrats have been launching unprecedented smear attacks against Republican and Tea Party candidates. They are drumming up their base.
And many races are becoming too close for inaction.
This is why I have joined with other national leaders in supporting the "Super PAC for America."
This is a powerful and formidable grassroots organization that will unite the citizens of this great nation.
The goal is simple — on November 2 we will stand up and change America's path for the better.
And powering this movement is a very ambitious goal.
I am calling it "Project 100."
Our plan is for the Republicans to win 100 seats in this year's congressional elections.
This is admittedly a bold goal. But with enough support very attainable.
I have studied the numbers very carefully, and we believe this can be done.
And when it happens a shockwave will resonate not only through Washington, but also around the world.
Right now the Democrats control the House of Representatives by 39 votes.
Republicans need to simply win 39 seats to gain control.
Now while the GOP gaining control of the House is positive change, it's far from an overwhelming mandate.
To fix America we need to win a very large majority to send a powerful message to the establishment.
A message that will be impossible to ignore in the White House and on Capitol Hill.
With Project 100 we will win with a very large majority.
And the positive effects will be immediate:
·With this mandate we can repeal Obamacare.
·We can enact successful economic reform initiatives that will put our country back on a proper financial footing and deal with the staggering debt our nation faces.
·We can fix the immigration epidemic and secure our borders.
·We can enhance national security and win the war on terror.
·We can restore family values.
·We can demand our elected officials be held accountable for their actions . . . or inactions.
That's why I am teaming up with the Super PAC for America's "Project 100."
But we need your help to realize these goals.
Here's our strategy.
As you know, there are 50 likely seats that Republicans will win this year.
Right now, the national committees and other donors are contributing heavily to these 50 Republicans in key races across the country.
These 50 races are, for the moment, the most likely winners.
Super PAC for America's approach will be even more aggressive.
We are going to select the 50 races we believe are "second-tier" races. Ones that are not on the priority list for the national committees.
Ones the Democrats thought were "safe seats."
With a relatively small amount of money spent by Super PAC for America in these districts we could win an additional 50 seats.
And this will give Republicans 100 new seats for this Congress!
Imagine how Americans will vote in these additional 50 swing districts if we clearly spell out to them how Obamacare is going to reduce their Medicare benefits.
Left in place, Obamacare will target seniors with massive cuts of over $500 billion in benefits.
And Obama will add 30 million new people to the national healthcare system. This will undoubtedly cause long waits and endanger access to doctors and hospitals.
As you know, private insurance rates are ballooning. Children and seniors are being dropped from their coverage despite what President Obama sold the public about the end of "pre-existing conditions."
And our brave men and women in the military have been left out in the cold for much of the benefit of this so-called "reform."
But besides excluding Americans, this controversial legislation is also not economically viable.
The cost of federal outlays are set to skyrocket over a trillion dollars thanks to Obamacare.
But repealing Obamacare is just one issue that will be focused on to push Congress in the Republicans' favor.
How will independent voters in swing districts feel when it is clearly explained to them that the Bush tax cuts are expiring, and they are set to get hit with the largest tax hike in history?
President Obama and Speaker Nancy Pelosi promised to vote on the Bush tax cuts before they recessed.
But there has been no vote because it's been delayed until after the elections.
Typical of them, they lied.
This is because they are trying to avoid the public outcry of their true intentions until it's too late for you to do anything about it.
They hope Americans have short memories. That they will forget about the coming assault on their wealth.
But the "Project 100" will not let the citizens of this great nation forget.
I believe when independent voters hear the message we are going to send them, we are going to win 100 new Republican seats, giving Republicans a majority of over 60 votes in the new Congress!
This will not only send a powerful message to the establishment in Washington, it will also create a powerful force for change and the restoration of the Reagan agenda in Washington . . .
Less Government, Less Taxes, and Strong National Security.
These are the ideals of the Tea Party movement as well as all Reagan conservatives like you and me.
And they can become real.
The more we spend on these "safe Democratic seats" the more we put these incumbents in danger.
The Democrats will have to tie up incredible amounts of resources to defend these second-tier 50 seats that they once thought were safe.
They will not be able to help other Democrats in trouble in the first 50 seats now at risk.
In football we would call this strategy "prevent offense."
The Super PAC for America is in a Unique Position.
Because we are fighting for the issues and candidates who support the Founding Fathers' view of America there is no limit to the amount you can donate.
We are not driven by individual candidates, but a vision of how America should and can be.
The America you believe in.
The Super PAC for America is powered by average Americans who can only spare $5, $25, or $100, as well as those who can afford much more.
As I said, there is no limit to how much you can donate. And you are legally allowed to donate as an individual or as a corporation.
Our Goal Is Very Simple. In The Next Three Weeks We Are Seeking To Raise $20 Million For "Project 100."
If we divide $20 million over 50 districts it would be an expenditure of approximately $400,000 per district.
But we believe many of these districts are in small media markets where that money can go very, very far.
You can have a powerful impact in a short time. You can change the direction of our country by donating to us.
A $400,000 donation from a donor will give us one more Republican in Congress.
$100,000 will make a huge difference in our media efforts, even $50,000.
Most Americans can't afford such large donations.
Even $1,000 or $500 will help.
A donation of $250 can buy a TV ad in many districts reaching hundreds of thousands. Anything you can give will help.
With your help we can act as the guardian angel for this second-tier of 50 congressional seats that are up for grabs.
You can provide the much-needed support to these candidates by helping us flood the TV and radio airwaves.
Your donation can fortify our direct-mail and online efforts.
And by lending your financial support we can set up phone banks across America.
We can get the message out. Your message.
We can reclaim the America we know and love.
The one that has been taken from us by those who do not share our views.
President Reagan Used To Say At The End Of His Speeches:
"If Not Us, Who? If Not Now, When?"
I can't add anything more to his statement.
This was his call to arms. And today it's mine to you as well.
Paid for by Super PAC for America. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. www.superPACforAmerica.com.
Super PAC for America does not make contributions to candidates. Funds raised by Super PAC for America will only be used for independent expenditures in support of or opposition to candidates. Super PAC for America is permitted to accept contributions from individuals and corporations in any amount, provided that contributions from foreign nationals lacking permanent resident status and contributions from federal contractors may not be accepted.
Contributions to Super PAC for America are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.
