DONATE

Showing posts with label Dem Despotism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dem Despotism. Show all posts

Thursday, October 2, 2025

CTH Shares Documented Dem Crimes AGAINST GOP Opposition

 


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© October 2, 2025

 

I have no illusions that the U.S. Government is bureaucratic Deep State nightmare for WE-THE-PEOPLE who have trusted in the U.S. Constitution. This is a nightmare for WE-THE-PEOPLE because it doesn’t matter if Republican or (Marxist) Democrats are the majority Party because both sides have exploited/diluted the Constitution in the name of power rather than the Constitutional Rule of Law.

 

Some September 30 The Conservative Treehouse (aka The Last Refuge) posts have clearly stated the GOP/Dem abuse of the U.S. Constitution. And yet on a personal I’m a registered Republican in my State because at least the GOP preserves the semblance of Constitutional Originalism and American Patriotism. The 2st Century Dems have gone full Cultural Marxism [Know The Enemy: HERE, HERE & HERE] with an agenda to completely transform America [SEE: HERE, HERE, HERE & HERE] into a Globalist oriented Christian-hating Secular Humanistic society.

 

The CTH posts acknowledge a GOP complicity to the Bureaucratic Deep State yet focuses on Constitution-Shredding probably treasonous activities from the Obama Administration and the Installed Biden Administration (Probably the closet Obama 3rd Term).

 

YOU WILL NOT read this documented information in the Dem-Mouthpieces known as the Mainstream Media. SO take a look! As a precursor you should read (because not cross posting):

 

o   The NSA Report No One Has Ever Seen; By Sundance; The Conservative Treehouse; 9/30/25

 

JRH 10/2/25

Always Free to Read yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com  

 

********************************

 

DC Corruption on Scale – The “Too Big to Jail” Aspect

 

By Sundance

September 30, 2025

The Conservative Treehouse

 

A frequent reaction when understanding the revelations of the Obama Surveillance System is:

 

WOW! If only 1/2 of this is true, why haven’t heads rolled?

 

This is a very common response.

Washington DC – Foreboding Clouds (CTH Photo)

 

The problem, that few understand and even fewer accept, is that this is not a partisan issue. Every element within the DC system is a stakeholder in maintaining the status of corruption; that includes every Republican and every Democrat, every leftist, moderate, liberal, libertarian and every conservative.

 

The entire DC system, including the RNC and DNC, are aligned to retain and expand the surveillance state- including popular and well-known names like Devin Nunes, Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, Susie Wiles, Ed Martin, Bill Barr, Mike Johnson, Marco Rubio, John Ratcliffe and Jim Jordan.  These names are just a few of the people who believe in the created “continuity of government” national security system. A system that justifies and underpins the capture of all electronic metadata.

 

To address the “if only 1/2 of this is true” aspect.  Let me remind you of the very specific evidence that supports what is demonstrably visible in the Obama spying operation.

 

Deep inside the report, released by John Durham {CITATION}, the special counsel outlined how former FBI Director James Comey was intimately involved in the creation of the Carter Page FISA application.

 

Durham noted that Comey kept asking the DOJ National Security Division and FBI counterintelligence investigators, “Where’s the FISA, we need the FISA?” However, John Durham never interviewed James Comey or Andrew McCabe.

 

The former FBI Director and Deputy refused to cooperate or give testimony to John Durham. So, how did John Durham have details about the demands of Comey?

 

The answer is found in the footnotes.

 

Special Counsel John Durham reviewed transcripts of interviews given by Andrew McCabe to the Office of the Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, who previously investigated FBI conduct in the origin of the Carter Page FISA.

 

Durham pulled quotes from that transcript. [Footnote #1207, page 199 – Durham Report]

Footnote #1207, page 199 – Durham Report (CTH Photo) [SOURCE]

 

QUESTIONS: If Andrew McCabe gave testimony to the OIG about the motives and impetus of FBI Director James Comey, in pushing for the Carter Page FISA application, why did the OIG report never outline those transcribed interviews? Why was the interview transcript never included in the 2019 OIG report?

 

[NOTE: An August 15, 2019, transcribed interview of Andrew McCabe exists in the OIG office.  That means, DNI Tulsi Gabbard through Attorney General Pam Bondi can request the McCabe transcription and release it to the public.]

 

However, let me answer the question about why it was never released without the customary pretending from the DC professional political class. The short version is that OIG Michael Horowitz was protecting the DOJ and FBI. The longer version is a coverup that includes Rod Rosenstein, Bill Barr and ultimately yes, John Durham.

 

“Where’s the FISA? We need the FISA.” ~ James Comey

James Comey Testifying (CTH Photo)

 

The DOJ-NSD, FBI and FBI Counterintelligence Division needed to find a safe and legal justification for previous spying on the Trump campaign.

 

The Clinton operation and 2016 FISA Title 1 surveillance of former CIA operative Carter Page became the fraudulent justification for that intent.

 

Because “FISA Title I” surveillance authority against a U.S. citizen is so serious (the U.S. government is essentially calling the target a spy), only a few people are authorized to even apply for such surveillance warrants. One of the four people authorized to make such a search warrant request is the Asst. Deputy Attorney General, as head of the National Security Division of the DOJ.

 

In September and October of 2016, a few critical things were happening:

 

1. NSA Director Mike Rogers was about to inform the FISC of the FBI spying operation using the NSA database.

 

2. CIA Director John Brennan was informing President Obama of the risk factors associated with the Clinton/FBI operation (that included #1).

 

3. The DOJ-NSD was quickly assembling the FISA Court application, sans Woods File, to be used against Carter Page. The Clinton/Steele Dossier was going to be used in lieu of the mandatory Woods File.

 

While Comey was saying, “Where’s the FISA? We need the FISA.” Pressure was building on the office of the Asst. Deputy Attorney General in charge of the DOJ-NSD, that’s John Carlin.

Carlin & Page (CTH Photo)

 

Subsequently, in late September 2016, Asst. Attorney General John P. Carlin resigned as head of the DOJ-NSD. {CITATION}

 

Did Carlin resign (in fear) because he simply didn’t feel comfortable participating in the convoluted operation?  It seems likely.

 

MORE EVIDENCE – THE DOCUMENT TRAIL.

 

A few years later, September 28, 2020, while COVID was raging and few people were paying attention, OIG Horowitz released a operation [technically, exploiting the NSA database].

 

On its face, the OIG release {SEE HERE} outlines a review and finding, actually a warning, by Horowitz’s office about FBI contractor access to “a certain national security database.”

 

The OIG report was titled: “Management Advisory: Notification of Concerns Identified in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Contract Administration of a Certain Classified National Security Program.”

OIG Letter to FBI Contractor Database Access (CTH Photo) [SOURCE]

 

The advisory part is particularly interesting, when absorbed through the prism of prior information.

 

On the surface of the release, the OIG was noting concerns and a warning shared with the FBI about ongoing contractor access to the NSA database. Thus, a “classified national security program” becomes defined.

 

However, in the background of the release, it appears the OIG was using this public notification as a CYA of sorts.

 

Meaning, the OIG was saying publicly they have advised the FBI of “concerns” they carried with the FBI abusing access to the NSA database.

 

Within the report, you will note the IG calls out the FBI because the FBI hid their response to the IG warning behind the cloud of “classification” and national security matters.

 

This left the IG with no alternative, except to say the classified response, technically a non-response, had to be accepted as the final FBI response to the IG warning.

 

The IG goes on to say to the FBI, you have 90 days to tell me what you did to address the contractor access abuses.  [The 2020 election fell inside this 90-day window and effectively removed any pressure for the FBI to respond.]

 

In reality, the reason for the report was OIG Michael Horowitz covering his ass on the FBI spying operation, and telling us why. Perhaps that’s why Horowitz was removed from his position recently, and sent to the IRS office where Secretary Bessent could keep an eye on him.

 

Keep in mind, this ongoing access to the bulk NSA metadata is a big deal. All of the FISA audits in the past eight + years have pointed out how FBI contractors and government officials continue to abuse their access to the database and unlawfully extract information, without minimization efforts required by Fourth Amendment protections.

 

The scale of the surveillance abuse is actually stunning.  In 2020, the OIG had reviewed the process and found the same issues, that existed in 2015 and 2016, as identified by NSA Director Mike Rogers, remained uncorrected five years later.  Yes, the embeds within the FBI were still conducting spy operations even when President Trump was in office.  That’s the point within the September 28, 2020, letter.

 

Now, you might note, within my prior research outline, I said, ” This is an issue Director Rogers would later address by moving custodial control of the NSA database to Cyber Command (a DoD agency).”  Indeed, Rogers did take that action in his effort to find some guardrail that would stop the exploitation, but it didn’t work.

 

[Keep in mind, trying to stop the exploitation of the NSA database when every element within Washington DC supports the availability to exploit that database, is a frustrating exercise in futility.  Stakeholder example: Think about congressional stock trading.  Think about DC insiders with access to the private electronic communication of corporations and corporate CEOs. See the value?]

 

How do we know moving the NSA Database to Cybercommand did not work?  Keep reading…

 

MORE EVIDENCE – MORE DOCUMENTS:

 

First, context – The 2020 election is now over.  Biden was installed via mail-in ballots. Trump is told he lost.  Then, on January 6, 2021, a fedsurrection took place.  The FBI is now on the hunt for attendees to the J6 protest.  FBI operation “Arctic Frost” is in full swing. Now, let’s look at this specific moment in time.

Michael Horowitz of OIG (CTH Photo)

 

Office of Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified, in April 2022, that more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place between Dec. 1st, 2020 and Nov. 30th, 2021, by government officials and/or contractors working on behalf of the federal government. {CITATION}

 

Approximately 30%, of those 3.4 million search queries, were outside the rules and regulations that govern warrantless searches – what the politically correct government calls “non-compliant searches.”  Approximately one million times the NSA Database was used, unlawfully, to conduct electronic surveillance.

 

Additionally, IG Horowitz also admitted that somewhere north of 10,000 federal employees have access to conduct these searches of the NSA database; a database which contains the electronic data of every single American, including emails, text messages, social media posts, instant messages, direct messages, phone calls, geolocation identifiers, purchases by electronic funds, banking records and any keystroke any American person puts into any electronic device for any reason.

 

If we were in a functioning system of government, everything would have stopped, right then.

 

In a nation concerned about digital IDs, Central Bank Digital Currencies, and the inherent constitutional privacy protections, no conversation would be taking place that was not about this issue.

 

What the OIG revealed, in 2022, was a massive explosion in the exploitation of the NSA database that took place after the November 2020 election, after all these “reforms” were in place, and after NSA Director Mike Rogers moved the database into U.S. Cybercommand.

 

You think it stopped?  Hell – it’s getting worse.

 

The entire DC apparatus, ‘friend’ and foe alike, support the status quo.

 

Patriots have only one ally in the endeavor to drag it all out in full sunlight in front of the American public.  And that, my friends, is exactly why the UniParty system is targeting DNI Tulsi Gabbard constantly.

UniParty System Targets Tulsi Gabbard (CTH Photo)

 

Support CTH Here

© 2025 The Conservative Treehouse

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

DHS Releases Information Showing TSA “Quiet Skies” Connected to FBI Operation “Arctic Frost”

 

By Sundance

October 1, 2025

The Conservative Treehouse

 

The information is going to come out to the public in the same format from which it was created, the “silo format.”  It is up to us, the independent thinking American people, to force the silo administrators to understand how it all connects.

 

The connections will not be made willingly by any entity, friend or foe, inside Washington DC.   Instead, willful blindness will permeate each revelation as it is discovered.  DC does not want us to see how it all connects. It is up to us to put the puzzle together, then shove the undeniable resulting image in their face.

 

DATA – Senator Chuck Grassley first revealed the existence of FBI “Operation Arctic Frost,” the intentional targeting of J6 attendees and those who supported President Trump in the 2020 election (consider that silo #1).   Two years later OIG Michael Horowitz outlined how during this exact timeframe (Dec ’20 to – Nov ’21) more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place during this timeframe (consider that silo #2).  Yesterday, Senator Rand Paul outlined how TSA operation “Quiet Skies” was an outcome of the J6 monitoring (consider that Silo #3).

 

Can you see how they all connect?  Arctic Frost was the weaponized FBI operation that empowered the FBI searches of the NSA database noted by Horowitz. Those results were then cross-fed to the J6 committee and DHS, where the TSA triggered Quiet Skies against the target results.   THIS IS WEAPONIZING GOVT, denied by almost all.  WATCH:

 

Youtube VIDEO: BREAKING NEWS: Rand Paul Details 'Weaponization' Of TSA Against Tulsi Gabbard During Biden Era


[Posted by Forbes Breaking News

Posted on Sep 30, 2025

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

Follow the links and citations above.  Put it into a timeline.  It is all connected.

 

We are in an abusive relationship with our government.  The corporate American media are codependent enablers to our abuse.

 

If we had a functioning independent media, they would be making the connections and outlining how the government was weaponized.  Instead, the media obfuscate, distract and direct attention away from the visibly evident weaponization by Obama/Biden, toward the nonexistent imaginary weaponization by Trump.

 

The thread that binds all of the Obama/Biden weaponization above, runs through Main Justice and the FBI.  This is why it is so frustrating to see current FBI Director Kash Patel deny the institutional corruption that is at the foundation of his organization.

DC Eye of Sauron (CTH Photo)

 

© 2025 The Conservative Treehouse

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Biblical Perspective on Government Mandated Mask



JRH 8/25/20
Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit, check 
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 
OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.
**********************************
Biblical Perspective on Government Mandated Mask
EKKLESIA SPECIAL EDITION


Posted by Daniel Navejas
August 23, 2020

A Biblical Perspective on Government Mandated Mask & The Doctrine of Lesser Magistrates:

As the government begins to institute mask mandates, Christians must seriously consider what our response should be. In these tumultuous times it is even more crucial that we KNOW & LIVE the TRUTH!

The issue of mandating masks is extremely controversial, but it is also vitally important. We believe the God ordained role of Government is to PROTECT, not to infringe on the liberties that GOD has given us. Blind compliance with unjust and tyrannical demands is neither Godly nor biblical, and the road of compromise and compliance ALWAYS leads to enslavement, persecution and tyrannical dictatorships.

But in the midst of this we have begun to see the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates, practiced across the nation. (click here to download a free PDF: https://caperepublic.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/matthew_j._trewhella_the_doctrine_of_the_lesser_magistrate.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1FezEeJ-fUh1lYQtaBQf9g5F8hp8riwvlHwjM1n_eMhekbKPZQCqTDMNA).  

Pastor Matt Trewhella, the author of the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates, recently preached a sermon on the issue of mask mandates explaining biblically and historically why it is no small matter. (Audio: https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=72120161361809&fbclid=IwAR3lvj7csU-2dT9kW2_hd__RdTp8T4y_Cv-V6vF23Q0Se1siOk9l6rlBYtQ [Direct Audio: https://www.sermonaudio.com/saplayer/playpopup.asp?SID=72120161361809])


Here in Oklahoma communities have begun to demand that city councils and Mayors be held accountable for these unconstitutional orders. The message is clear, if you are unwilling to listen and represent us, then you will be RECALLED & REPLACED.

A group called Unite Norman has collected over 2,400 signatures, enough to place two city council members on a recall ballot. They need 18,000 signatures to place the Mayor on recall. The link above will take you to the Facebook group if you would like to get connected to them as more and more communities began to follow suit.

BIBLICAL AND HISTORICAL PRECEDENT

1Pe 2:13-17 “Be subject for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme…”

We do not have an emperor who is supreme. The supreme ruler of the land is not a person but law—our Constitution. Even the President is subject to the Constitution. Therefore, in order to honor 1 Pet 2:13, we must oppose lawlessness. Robbing a convenience store is lawlessness, but it is also lawless for a politician or policeman to violate the supreme law of the land. It is my duty as a Christian and a citizen to oppose those who violate the law which is the Constitution. Laws contrary to the Constitution are invalid and in order to oppose lawlessness, we must NOT comply with invalid laws. [Blog Editor: Bold text indicates Blog Editor extreme agreement.]

Rom 13:1-7 “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities…”

Context is very important here. For the people to whom this was written, the governing authority was an emperor and ecclesiastical leaders. Neither of these are elected or in any way beholden to the people they rule. Our form of government could not be more different.

We literally select and HIRE our leaders, as an employer does employees, who then work FOR us. When they do not adequately perform the task for which we have chosen them, they hear from us, and, if needs be, are removed. It’s government by consent of the governed. When those we have chosen as leaders abuse their power, our lack of consent to their atrocities is the first recourse to halting the tyranny, and it is our duty to do so.

Our duty, I repeat, both as citizens of a self-ruled republic, and as Christians obeying the ultimate rule(r) of our country. Indeed, our refusal to consent is the first line of defense against tyranny.

The primary obstruction before a power-hungry politician is, “The people will not go along with it”.

Sadly, power-hungry politicians have lately discovered that the people will in fact go along will all manner of abuses, even clamoring for more, when they are afraid of a virus. This is a very dangerous precedent.

The duties of the responsible American citizen are vastly different from those of the Roman or Israeli citizen. Alexander Hamilton said:

“If it were to be asked, what is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of security in a Republic? The answer would be, An inviolable respect for the Constitution and Laws… It is by this, in a great degree, that the rich and powerful are to be restrained from enterprises against the common liberty—operated upon by the influence of a general sentiment, by their interest in the principle, and by the obstacles which the habit it produces erects against innovation and encroachment. It is by this, in a still greater degree, that caballers, intriguers, and demagogues are prevented from climbing on the shoulders of faction to the tempting seats of usurpation and tyranny… a sacred respect for the constitutional law is the vital principle, the sustaining energy of a free government… There are indeed great and urgent cases where the bounds of the constitution are manifestly transgressed, or its constitutional authorities so exercised as to produce unequivocal oppression on the community, and to render resistance justifiable.”

James Madison said:

"It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. We hold this prudent jealousy to be the first duty of citizens, and one of the noblest characteristics of the late Revolution. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle."

Hamilton again, in the Federalist Papers stated:

“If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify.”

"What did Jesus do about such ordinances that ran contrary to the HIGHER LAWS?"

This quoting of our nation’s architects could go on for pages. But to return to Scripture, when Jesus walked the earth, many times He healed people on the Sabbath. He could certainly have waited one more day, and been in compliance with the Pharisees’ rules. But He deliberately chose not to. What is His justification for this “rebellion”? I would suggest that in Israel’s government of that day, the Torah was their Constitution, and the laws of the Pharisees were comparable to our city ordinances. What did Jesus do about such ordinances that ran contrary to the higher laws? In at least some instances, He defied them to make a point. When He and His disciples were walking through a grain field on the Sabbath, they began to eat the ears of grain as they walked. The Pharisees strongly objected; this too was against the rules. Jesus let them do it, and gave the Pharisees a lesson on Israeli history.

Paul insisted on his civil rights, and did not comply with directives to the contrary. Acts 16:36-39 says:

"And the jailer reported these words to Paul, saying, 'The magistrates have sent to let you go. Therefore come out now and go in peace.' But Paul said to them, 'They have beaten us publicly, uncondemned, men who are Roman citizens, and have thrown us into prison; and do they now throw us out secretly? No! Let them come themselves and take us out.' The police reported these words to the magistrates, and they were afraid when they heard that they were Roman citizens. So they came and apologized to them. And they took them out and asked them to leave the city."

What about the blacks in the 1960s? Many black Christians engaged in much civil disobedience. They sat at lunch counters where the "law" said they could not sit. I can’t see a compelling argument for this law violating anyone’s conscience. It wasn’t a sin for them to sit elsewhere. They could have followed the rules and still eaten, gotten to work on the bus, etc. But the law was unjust and they made a point of defying it in hopes of changing it. Does Scripture really condemn this stand for justice? Especially under a government designed to accept such rebukes.

And what of the Jews? If the law says to put this star of David identification on, there’s nothing immoral about that; the Christian ones among them should obey, right? In The Boy on the Wooden Box, a memoir of a Jew on Schindler’s List, the importance of “taking alarm” early on in abuses is echoed:

“Meanwhile, in Krakow, the Germans tightened their grip on us. Jewish parents could no longer reassure children with the phrase, ‘It will soon be over,’ and a new phrase surfaced: ‘If this is the worst that happens.’…When forced to hand over our radio to the Nazis, we silently repeated the words; whenever a German was near, we whispered to ourselves, ‘If this is the worst…’”

Blind obedience to government, even in America, is ill-advised. “Perhaps the following historical event, as recorded in Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee Brown, will serve to illustrate the incompleteness of the obedience perspective alone.

On November 5, 1864, Major Scott J. Anthony assured Black Kettle and a party of approximately 600 Cheyenne Indians that if they returned to their camp, they would be safe under the protection of nearby Fort Lyon. Black Kettle had been to Washington, D.C., met President Lincoln, and been given a large American flag which he flew over his tent with the promise from Col. Greenwood that no soldiers would fire on him as long as he flew this flag. Black Kettle and his tribe went peacefully to Sand Creek, obediently remaining under the umbrella of the authority of the United States government.

On November 26, 1864, Major Anthony and the Fort Lyon troops, along with Col. Chivington and 600 reinforcements, attacked Black Kettle and his people at sunrise. As the soldiers opened fire on the sleeping Indians, women and children rushed to huddle around Black Kettle’s tent which flew the American flag. The soldiers paid no attention to flags or cries for peace, but proceeded to massacre the Indians in a most brutal manner, killing 105 women and children and 28 men. (All but 35 of the men were gone on a hunting party, leaving the camp unprotected.) Black Kettle was under...authority...The Indians who didn’t believe Major Anthony and refused to camp [under authority] were unmolested. Black Kettle was not an advocate of war, but a voice for peace among his people. [Blog Editor: Here is the Thoughtco.com account that differs only Chief Lean Bear met with President Lincoln]

Thomas Jefferson once said:

“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty and property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.”

It is the duty of responsible citizens to do their own research and not to trust the “government experts”. Men, with power, usually have ulterior motives, and it is for our safety that we must determine to the best of our ability (and with the internet we have greater powers than ever before) whether their advice is valid or tainted with ulterior motives and self-interest. The necessary action taken after such knowledge is gained is not the foot-stamping of rebellious teenagers but the responsible action of adults who are not gullible.

“All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree.”—James Madison


We at the Ekklesia believe government instituted mask mandates are ENTIRELY outside their jurisdiction and is nothing less than TYRANNICAL. While individuals and private business have every right to choose to wear and enforce masks on their own property, the government DOES NOT have that right. Let us therefore consider carefully and prayerfully how we ought to interpret passages such as Romans 13 in light of context, additional Scriptures, historical precedent, and present times.

To learn more about The Ekklesia of Oklahoma or donate to further our efforts visit our website: www.ekkok.com

To learn more and even discuss what you can do to protect the rights of your community and city you can send a private message or email Pastor Daniel Navejas directly at daniel.navejas@gmail.com
______________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Embedded links by the Editor. Direct links (except direct audio sermon with embed by Matt Trewhella) are by Pastor Daniel Navejas.