Dr. Lively is calling on Pastors to stand up for a moral
America and the Conservative values that have made America great instituted by
our Founding Fathers. Today the Dems are the Red Coat King George oppressing
America with Leftist Deep State contradicting values.
Photo: Dr. Scott Lively, in the persona of Jonathan Edwards,
Tea Party Rally, Boston Commons, July 4, 2010
SPRINGFIELD, Mass., Jan. 30, 2018 /Christian
Newswire/ -- In the Revolutionary War, pastors who joined the
Continental Army were called the Black Robed Regiment, and there were many
because they understood the need for Godly Leadership to defeat tyranny.
Without them we would not have become the first and greatest Constitutional
Republic in the history of the world: a nation founded upon the Bible and a
Covenental Oath called the Declaration of Independence.
Today, America faces a comparable test. President Trump's miraculous victory in
2016 saved us from subjection to the Clinton Crime Family and provided a window
of reprieve in which to take back our country from the predatory leftist elites
of the deep state, an adversary far more insidious than King George.
Under the banner of "Resistance," all the powers and principalities
of the hard left, deploying all their fascist tactics, are waging a massive
political offensive and massing for the Great Election War of 2018. Their goal
is to crush our rebellion, oust our president, and finish their task of
subsuming Christian America under global socialist control.
Today we face a critical test of Christian courage and resolve. The Black Robed
Regiment MUST rise again and provide Godly leadership on America's political
battlefield.
As a proud member of that regiment, I issue a challenge to every
Bible-believing pastor: ARISE BROTHERS! Enter the fray at this critical
juncture! Run for political office wherever you are, but especially in places
where the Godless Left has the tightest stranglehold. Run to win! But even
where that end is unlikely, run sacrificially, willing to govern if God grants
the victory, but forcing the adversary to expend resources defending ground
they thought was secure. Shun political "norms" and expectations,
using your platform to boldly shine the light of the Gospel and Biblical truth
into the darkness of the political realm. Bravely defy media mockery and
intimidation to give hope and encouragement to every believer, seeker and
conservative ally under the yoke of liberal oppression.
In this I am leading by example, running aggressively as a pro-life,
pro-constitution conservative against the most popular governor in America (a
pro-abortion, anti-family, pork-shoveling Republican) – in ultra-liberal
Massachusetts.
In God's eyes we win just by standing up to speak plain truth without apology
or equivocation. So, for the Love of God, our Families, and our Fellow
Americans, BLACK ROBED REGIMENT: ARISE!
Dr. Scott Lively is a pastor and constitutional law attorney running as a
Republican for Governor of Massachusetts who may be reached by email at sdllaw@gmail.com or
at 413-250-0984. He will formally issue this challenge on behalf of the
national Christian activist group Reclaiming America for Christ on February
6th, 6:30PM at Fairview Baptist Church Fellowship Hall, 1230 N Sooner Rd,
Edmond, Oklahoma. He will be joined by Pastor Dan Fisher, Candidate for
Governor of Oklahoma and author of Bringing Back the Black Robed Regiment
(2013).
The next time you hear a Leftist radical – er, I mean
Democrat – tell you that Crooked Hillary did not approve Uranium One
because she was just one of nine who gave unanimous support OR that President Barry Soetoro – er, I mean
Barack Hussein Obama – was the greatest President in U.S.; then direct
them to this very informative essay by Andrew Benjamin.
Midday on November 14th, FOX
News talking head Shepard Smith, whom we might charitably label as a liberal
non-heterosexual who may not like Donald Trump, meaning his politics have
everything to do with his sexual preferences and whom he would vote for, and
very little to do with reality, gave the nation a much-needed reality check.
Hillary Clinton is innocent
of all charges. As Shepard opened his mouth, we saw former FBI Director James
Comey’s eyes peeking out.
Shepard’s was a monologue
over which the liberal press went bananas. Or “ape” if you will.
The line is the line
according to Smith and his media mates on every other channel that would give
the death penalty to Team Trump and his family at the earliest opportunity, for
the mere outrage of winning an election, with the stories of every Democrat
calling for impeachment.
“The accusation is
predicated on the charge that Secretary Clinton approved the sale. She did not.
A committee of nine evaluated the sale, the president approved the sale, the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and others had to offer permits, and none of the
uranium was exported for use by the U.S. to Russia.” said Smith.
Smith’s monologue was meant
to dispel any suspicion still hanging in with FOX viewers about the Clintons
who have, throughout their illustrious careers, only benefited the nation. It
was meant to reinforce in liberal minds the fact that Donald Trump colluded
with Vladimir Putin who made them pull 63 million levers across America for
Donald Trump. It is meant to fix in one’s mind the notion that the entire Trump
Team is guilty of perjury and even treason. And the idea that Barack Obama
colluded with Hillary and the Russians about anything is preposterous, since
their suspected collusion is not reported on any channel except for Shepard’s,
and therefore does not exist.
The gist of Shepard’s
historical “innovation” is that Hillary Clinton is wholly innocent of
accusations about how and why the $145 million wound up in her family’s slush
fund AFTER the sale took place. It is to dispel the notion of a possible RICO
(organized crime) investigation into the Clinton Matter. Shepard’s spin
suggests that the Clintons are hardly greedy, in fact, never; or self-dealing
and treacherous. Donald Trump is, for questioning the Clinton Matter in tweets.
The bottom-line of Shepard’s
astonishing Aesop’s Fables and the non-contextualization of history (as well as
the record of the players), was that there were nine cabinet members of
CIFUS, The Committee on Foreign Investment in the
United States, who had unanimously, of their free will, approved
the “good deal” that was ultimately approved by the president himself. The same
president who appointed the self-same cabinet.
Clearly, as in law, precedent
must rule in this matter, the same as the precedent for the Iran Nuke
Deal which was a Good Deal for America (that
was the line our past president from some central African nation told us); as
the North Korean Nuke Deal was a Good Deal for America (which was the line the
husband of the last female Democrat presidential candidate told the nation over
two decades ago); as is the Uranium-1 good deal from which ONLY the Clinton Family Foundation profited.
It had to be a Good Deal for America, and the $145 million slush fund the
Clintons can do with as they will happens to be a sidebar.
Every deal from which
America’s enemies profit has to be a Good Deal for America.
Especially with all the Good
Deals in which Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got involved.
For example:
1)The BenghaziGate Good Deal in
which the United States got run out of North Africa by a band of extremist
religious thugs, got Americans killed just to make the deal better, and made
certain that that nation was taken over by ISIS.
3)The Iran Nukes Good Deal
which insured that Iran will not only continue to develop IBCM’s - Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles -
but in less than eight years arm them with MIRVs - Multiple Re-entry Vehicles tipped with nuclear
bombs. that Good Deal was meant to make Americans happy.
4)The Eric Holder Fast & Furious Good
Deal in which 55,000 Mexicans and some
Americans were murdered by weapons seized by Barack Obama and Holder from
American citizens, and given to the Mexican drug cartels. Hillary was SecState
at the time dealing “diplomatically” with Mexico for America’s benefit.
5)The IRS-gate Good Deal in which American organizations and
groups with words in their names such as “American,” “Patriot,” “Constitution,”
and similar suggesting a faith in law and allegiance to the nation, were
targeted for examination - and then deliberately paralyzed from raising funds
for political campaigns.
6)The DNC-Clinton Primary Fix-Gate Good Deal
in which a year prior to the presidential primaries one candidate received, by
written agreement from the Party itself, full control of the party, its
activities and decision-making, and all the money the party raised. Funds which
she promptly redirected to her own campaign and into her own pockets. Clearly,
she was never greedy and self-dealing and never had any interest in uranium.
Under the greatest president ever, Barack Obama, and his
former SecState Hillary, Good Deals for America were almost a daily occurrence
and even Settled Science.
In 2009 and 2010, in a bid to corner and dominate the global
uranium market, Russia’s atomic energy agency, Rosatom,
was anxious to take over a majority stake in the uranium mining company UrAsia
formerly owned by Clinton ally and benefactor, Canadian Frank Giustra.
After the board members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States appointed
by Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton’s nod approved the sale, as well as
managing the approval of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
leadership appointed by Barack Obama at Clinton’s behest, Russia bought the
rest of Uranium One in 2013. Clearly, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had
nothing to do with this Good Deal to benefit the American People and put
America’s uranium assets in Russian hands.
As the CFIUS includes the State Department as one of the
regulatory body’s members, Hillary asserted that she had nothing to do with
“massaging” the deal because she never had any interest in money, uranium,
or even her own agency at State. She kept insisting that a number of agencies
had agreed to the good deal for America because they too, had no interest in
making the Clintons fabulously wealthy. According to the latest reports from
insider sources on the inside speaking anonymously behind closed doors at an
undetermined date and place, she did not go so far as to suggest that selling
off America’s assets and wealth was also a good deal, but we might presume that
she was thinking it.
What Shepard Smith failed to disclose is that the “friendly”
- as opposed to hostile - Uranium One takeover began in 2005. Meanwhile behind
the scenes we presume Hillary Clinton was the senator at the time pushing the
deal. And Frank Giustra still owned the company.
The Clintons were at his side for no reason at all all
this time. For example, no reason like this, reported by the Times:
“The $500,000 (speaking) fee (in
Moscow)—among Mr. Clinton’s highest—was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian
investment bank with ties to the Kremlin…”
Meanwhile, as Team Clinton reportedly spent $1.2 Billion on
getting her elected to the presidency mostly so no investigation will ever be
launched into the Clinton Good Deals (that $1.2B represents One Thousand Two
Hundred times a Million dollars) CNN gave you updates 24/7 for months
about the Russians using FACEBOOK to
infringe on American democracy and turn an American election in Donald Trump’s
favor.
With the $6500 that FACEBOOK reported the Russians spent.
An amount that would not buy a used steel, never mind, gold,
Rolex.
According to the Times:
The two men had flown aboard Mr.
Giustra’s private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined with the
authoritarian president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Mr. Clinton handed the Kazakh
president a propaganda coup when he expressed support for Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid
to head an international elections monitoring group, undercutting American
foreign policy and criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among
others, his wife, (Hillary Clinton) then a senator.
Within days of the visit, Mr.
Giustra’s fledgling company, UrAsia Energy Ltd., signed a preliminary deal
giving it stakes in three uranium mines controlled by the state-run uranium
agency Kazatomprom.
If the Kazakh deal was a major
victory, UrAsia did not wait long before resuming the hunt. In 2007, it merged
with Uranium One, a South African company with assets in Africa and Australia,
in what was described as a $3.5 billion transaction. The new company, which
kept the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors including Ian
Telfer, a Canadian who became chairman. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Giustra,
whose personal stake in the deal was estimated at about $45 million, said he
sold his stake in 2007.
Soon, Uranium One began to snap
up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the
purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium
exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the
acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in
Wyoming, Texas and Utah. That deal made clear that Uranium One was intent on
becoming “a powerhouse in the United States uranium sector with the potential
to become the domestic supplier of choice for U.S. utilities,” the company
declared. ‚Ķ The Times published an article revealing the 2005 trip’s
link to Mr. Giustra’s Kazakhstan mining deal. It also reported that several
months later, Mr. Giustra had donated $31.3 million to
Mr. Clinton’s foundation.
What Shepard Smith neglected to disclose among all the good
deals going down among his media mates at CNN and MSNBC, The NY Times and
WashPo, is the timing and the timeline, and that 1 + 1 may actually equal 2.
Possibly 3.
The Times:
“Mr. Telfer’s (the chairman of
UrAsia) undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6
million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people
with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium
One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians
would have had no interest in the deal…..”
At least no interest in the deal until a former president
who made previous Good Deals that armed North Korea with nukes and ICBMs, came
to the rescue with a $500,000 speech that lasted at most 10 minutes, with
“guarantees” for millions more to arrive shortly for which no speeches will
will [sic] be made. And a box of cigars.
Bill Clinton, with Hillary at his side in the early years,
made sure that the Kahakh mines would become Russian mines. And the American
mines become Russian mines. She was SecState at the time, and if you’re seeing
a conflict of interest and self-dealing, you are seeing things.
It appears Shepard deliberately neglected the obvious for
political reasons of his own, in a speech that LeftMedia is now
celebrating thinking that FOX News, just like they, are now in the tank with
the Clinton narrative. Look, $145 million goes a long way to persuade the
reluctant that the sky is not blue.
For after all, there are no more deserving people to benefit
from all the Good Deals than the ones who made them: Barack Obama and the
Clintons.
Theirs is the Good Deal that stipulated that:
1. The $145,000,000 that wound up at the Clinton Family
Foundation for no reason at all got there for no reason at all.
and
2. That, for no reason at all Barack Obama appointed ALL the
voters at CIFUS and the other agencies under his command who approved the Good
Deal without ANY dissent. And then Barry approved the sale himself according to
Smith.
For absolutely no reason at all.
Not even the $145,000,000 reason and a genuine replica
of the Reset Button.
[Blog Editor: Title to PDF of above link: The
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS); By James K.
Jackson; Congressional Research Service; 54 pgs.; 10/11/17]
Andrew G. Benjamin is a real estate and tax specialist,
equities trader, a former economic advisor to New York city mayor Rudy
Giuliani; serving on the transition team’s Subcommittee on Taxation, Finance
and the Budget. Benjamin also wrote extensively about intelligence, economic
issues, the Mideast, terrorism, technology, high end audio and transnational
politics.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is
provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate
without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this
site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not
necessarily those of Canada Free Press.
Content is Copyright 1997-2017 the individual authors. Site
Copyright 1997-2017Canada Free Press.Com
This tidbit of AWESOME information hasn’t the MSM
yet. Apparently, according to a Newsmax story, Crooked
Hillary is about to experience Attorney General Jeff Sessions reopening an investigation
into her illegal email server while Secretary State.
The limited info available claims the DOJ has offered Crooked
Hillary a plea agreement. If accurate, the agreement would let Crooked Hillary
of the hook for further investigation, including pay-to-play investigations, if
she admits she committed a prosecutable offense over the emails.
If true, and she goes along with it the plea agreement, the
Clinton Crime family gets a pass on accountability. So far people in the know
seem to believe Crooked Hillary may have too much hubris to admit a criminal
offense.
Frankly, I hope a hubris issue is true. The Clinton Crime
family has operated too long without criminal accountability. I hope the
investigation is true. If there was a plea offer, I hope Clinton arrogance
refuses it. AND I hope a thorough investigation proceeds that leads to the
entire crooked swamp, up to and including Barack Hussein Obama!
The
Justice Department has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton's
mishandling of classified material on her private email system while she was
secretary of state, and is considering offering her a plea bargain if she will
agree to plead guilty to charges of breaking the law, according to a Clinton
attorney
The
investigation into Hillary Clinton's email servers has reportedly been
reopened, and the former presidential candidate has allegedly been offered a
plea deal. (Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images)
A Tuesday report published on
conservative website, Newsmax, has many people questioning the validity of
claims made against Hillary Clinton and reports that the email server
investigation has been reopened.
The article, titled,
“Hillary’s Plea Bargain,” was penned by Ed Klein, former New York Times
Magazine editor-in-chief, and claimed that not only had the Clinton email
investigation been reopened, but that Clinton was offered a plea bargain if she
will admit that she “committed a prosecutable crime.”
Klein claimed that the report
came from one of Clinton’s attorneys.
The
Justice Department has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s
mishandling of classified material on her private email system while she was
secretary of state, and is considering offering her a plea bargain if she will
agree to plead guilty to charges of breaking the law, according to a Clinton
attorney.
The
discussion of a plea bargain took place late last month and was offered by a
high-ranking Justice Department official to the Clinton lawyer.
During
the exploratory talks with the prosecutor, the Clinton attorney was told that
despite former FBI Director James Comey’s decision last July not to prosecute
Hillary, the Justice Department has reexamined the email case and believes
there are ample grounds for prosecuting Hillary on a number of counts.
Under
the Justice Department’s plea offer, Hillary would be required to sign a
document admitting that she committed a prosecutable crime. In return, the DOJ
would agree not to bring charges against Hillary in connection with the email
probe.
Also
as part of the agreement, the Justice Department would not proceed with an
investigation of Hillary’s pay to play deals with foreign governments and
businessmen who contributed to the Clinton Foundation or who paid Bill Clinton
exorbitant speaking fees.
The
Clinton attorney cautioned that normally a plea is offered by a prosecutor only
upon arraignment, and Hillary has not yet been charged with any crime.
Klein on Tuesday also noted that
he didn’t think Clinton would take the plea bargain.
Speaking with “America Talks
Live’s” Miranda Khan, Klein said, “Sometimes she has trouble admitting that
she’s Hillary Clinton, you’re absolutely right. This is a woman who never, ever
admits that she did anything wrong.”
“We’ve all seen how she has
blamed everybody but herself for her loss in 2016 at the presidential election.
So you’re right, I totally agree with you that the chances of her accepting
such an offer are practically zero,” he said.
Despite doubling down on his
remarks about the Clinton investigation, there seemed to be a discrepancy in
communication, because after the article was published, he told Khan that the
Department of Justice was “considering” reopening it, not that they had
reopened it.
“They
are seriously thinking of reopening this investigation and therefore if she
doesn’t take the plea agreement, which I agree with you, she almost certainly
won’t, I think they will then proceed with this investigation and this is going
to drag on for a long time and in a way balance the investigation that’s going
on with President Donald Trump and his campaign advisers regarding so-called
collusion with the Russians.”
Here is a collection of Tony Newbill emails that examines
the crookedness of Hillary Clinton and the kind of corruption she inspires the
Left to accomplish.
Somali Muslim candidate denies accusations of bigamy Minnesota Democrat says Trump-supporting
'racists' out to smear her
America’s soon-to-be first female
Muslim legislator has a problem on her hands.
She’s accused of being married to two men, at the same time, including one who
may be her brother. The second marriage was allegedly a sham, meant to deceive
the U.S. government’s immigration system, allowing him to emigrate from the
United Kingdom, according to local Minneapolis media.
But Ilhan Omar, a 33-year-old
Somali refugee who was the victor in Minnesota’s Aug. 9 Democratic primary,
denies the story, issuing a statement calling it “categorically false” and
based on “absurd rumors that don’t bear repeating.” She charged those raising
the issue are “racists” using “Donald Trump tactics” to drive a wedge between
various demographic segments of Minnesota voters.
…
But local attorney Scott Johnson,
an author of the well-read PowerLine blog, dropped a
bombshell a few days after the primary with a story so shocking that the local
media was forced to emerge from its euphoric coverage of Minnesota’s “first
female Muslim refugee legislator” and acknowledge that this candidate has
legitimate questions to answer.
So far she hasn’t answered many of
them. Instead she issued an initial terse statement of categorical denial, then
a second statement Wednesday that offered a few more details about her
marriages.
…
“Fraud, deceit, lies, corruption,
cover-up, bigamy, immigration law violations, law breaking – all appear to be
associated with the first Somali American winner of a Democratic primary in
Minnesota,” Bachmann told WND. “The newly discovered documents and witness
testimony cry out for an investigation.”
“If true,” she added, “the candidate
should withdraw immediately from the general election this fall.”
But instead of dropping out, Omar
responded by denying the charges, calling the blogger who reported them an
“Islamophobe” and hiring a lawyer.
Brian Lambert summed up the fallout in …READ ENTIRETY (Somali Muslim candidate denies accusations
of bigamy; By LEO HOHMANN; WND; 8/19/2016 8:50 PM)
The inquiries stem from contracting
work that Ms. Hayes, 47, a clean-energy consultant, performed and was paid for
while living with the governor and advising him on clean-energy issues. …
…
The revelation prompted her to
apologize publicly, not least to the governor, who she said knew nothing about
it. Marriage fraud is a federal crime, but the five-year statute of limitations
had passed.
“It was a marriage of convenience;
he needed help, and I needed financial support,” Ms. Hayes said at
a news conference in October. …
Willamette Week also suggested in a
story that Ms. Hayes had used access to the governor for economic gain in
consulting contracts for her company, 3EStrategies. And a drumbeat of new questions has continued
since. The Oregonian, the state’s largest newspaper, reported last week that
two people involved in Mr. Kitzhaber’s 2010 campaign helped Ms. Hayes find paid
work with groups interested in Oregon policy. In an
editorial last week, the …YOU
GET THE IDEA – DEM IMMIHRATION
FRAUD & CRONY CAPITALISM (Love
and Politics Collide as Scandals Plague Oregon’s Fourth-Term Governor; By KIRK JOHNSON; NYT; 2/11/15)
Questions about Ms. Hayes began last fall, when she
confirmed a newspaper report that said she had married her third husband, an
Ethiopian immigrant, for money in a sham marriage in 1997. She said she had
been 29, struggling financially, and was paid about $5,000 to marry an
18-year-old man who wanted to stay in the United States.
But the point here is that these methods of Usurpation of
the USA Legal system is why we see Totalitarian abuses of Liberty for legal citizens.
+++
this is another way
tyranny is being implemented on our legal system and it needs to stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
8/20/2016 11:34 AM
George Soros needs to be arrested for being an Enemy of the
US Constitution and we the people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Leaked Board Documents: Soros Organization Tried To Influence Supreme
Court Ruling On Illegal Immigration
Open Society Foundations,
Hungarian-born billionaire George Soros’ stated vehicle for progressive social
change, orchestrated a well-funded attempt to secure a desired
outcome in a U.S. Supreme Court case on illegal immigration
enforcement, according to a newly discovered memo between the
organization’s top U.S. officials and board members.
The February 2016 memo was among
thousands of internal OSF documents released to the public by anonymous hackers
whose stated goal is to “shed light on one of the most influential networks
operating worldwide.” OSF U.S. Programs director Ken Zimmerman and deputy
director Andrea Batista Schlesinger co-authored the memo, which is
addressed to the 14 advisory board members of the organization’s
U.S. operations.
Members of the advisory board include Soros family members, left-wing
activists, Ivy League professors and columnists for The Washington Post
and Foreign Policy magazine. The memo, entitled “State of U.S. Programs,”
is part of a 75-page file containing internal documents from a …READ
THE REST (Leaked Board
Documents: Soros Organization Tried To Influence Supreme Court Ruling On
Illegal Immigration; By Peter Hasson – Reporter Associate Editor; Daily Caller; 8/17/16 10:12
PM)
+++
And Now we can Thank
Hillary Clinton and the Corrupt crony DOJ for creating the Collapse of Justice!!!!!!
"Clinton Defense"
Popularity Surges In Espionage Cases
Earlier this week we wrote about
29-year-old Navy sailor, Kristian Saucier, who had plead guilty to
espionage charges for snapping 6 photos of classified areas of a nuclear
submarine and was facing up to 78 months in prison for his
"crime" (see "Convicted Spy Is Using Hillary's "Lack
Of Intent" Defense To Seek Leniency"). Even though
he knew the pictures were classified, Saucier said he took them to "be
able to show his family and future children what he did while he was in the
Navy" and denied ever showing the pictures to any "unauthorized
recipients."
Saucier's attorney used the
"Clinton Defense" at his sentencing hearing earlier this week,
arguing that he possessed just 6 sensitive photographs which was "far less
than Clinton’s 110 emails" that were ultimately deemed to contain
classified information. Saucier's attorney went on to argue that “...it
will be unjust and unfair for Mr. Saucier to receive any
sentence other than probation for a crime those more powerful than him will
likely avoid.”
Unsurprisingly, Saucier didn't
make out quite as well as Clinton but the "Clinton Defense"
may have resulted in some level of leniency in his sentencing. According
to The Hill, Saucier was
facing up to 78 months in prison for his admission to
"mishandling information" but a federal judge on Friday
sentenced him to 12 months instead. Greg Rinckey, Saucier’s lawyer,
said …READ
THE REST ("Clinton Defense" Popularity Surges
In Espionage Cases; By Tyler
Durden; Zero Hedge;
8/20/16 3:01 PM)
The stonewalling defense of Hillary and her ilk saying over
and over that she regrets and has learned from her mistakes and then the FBI
saying She is too Unsophisticated to know what she did wrong to be charged with
Intent. How can you be so Unsophisticated to know what you did was wrong to be
charged, but then say you are sorry for what you did not know what you were
doing??????????
Clinton Deemed too "Unsophisticated"
to Pursue Charges Against so why would you want Hillary as POTUS?
Clinton Too Dumb to Jail: People Laugh as FBI Calls Hillary
Unsophisticated
FBI Director James Comey justified his decision to not recommend
charges against the former Secretary of State, at a congressional hearing this
week, over her alleged mishandling classified documents by appealing to the
fact that she was too stupid to fathomably have the requisite criminal intent.
There is a general rule among attorneys who practice white-collar law
– most defendants are guilty, but some are simply too dumb to realize
they did anything wrong with the phrase “criminally stupid” applied
to this group by their own lawyers. Prosecutors traditionally have
mercy on this type of defendant and based on FBI Director James
Comey’s testimony before Congress, it seems Hillary’s "get
out of jail free" card may not have been her corrupt cronyism,
but apparently just sheer idiocy.
The Case to Indict Hillary Was Ironclad
Comey rattled the world for 14
minutes on Tuesday morning laying out the elements of the case
against Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton establishing each element
of the crime that she was charged with in perfect legalese leaving
viewers to just wait for him to utter those final words that … but the suddenly the
unthinkable happened – …
never came.
…
He further determined that "no
reasonable person" would believe that the private server was an
appropriate place to house classified documents which she "knew or
should have known" she would receive on her system.
Comey further laid out the fact that several of the documents
contained HUMINT and SIGINT, information that was acquired by CIA analysts
who often imperiled their own lives in order to obtain the
information that the former Secretary of State dangled out in front
of hostile foreign actors like a piece of meat.
It
has further been determined that Hillary Clinton’s emails contained the
identities of at least 47 undercover CIA personnel operating in posts
around the world and that her system was likely hacked on several
occasions due to not only her private email server, but also exposing
information abroad by using a Blackberry while in foreign countries
to access her email system.
…
Comey Changed the Statute to Justify the Decision
Comey characterized Hillary’s mishandling of classified information as
"extreme carelessness," a synonym for the term gross negligence
but with the FBI Director requiring an even higher level of intent,
known as criminal intent or purposefully engaging in an unlawful act,
which was not actually required by the statute.
This stands in stark contradiction of the very first cannon
of statutory construction, as was adopted by the Supreme Court
in Caminetti v. United States, 242 US 470 (1917) that law enforcement and
judicial officers are not to try to read beyond the language
of a statute if its language is plainly stated.
"It is elementary that the meaning of a statute must, in the
first instance, be sought in the language in which the act is framed,
and if that is plain then the sole function of the courts is
to enforce it according to its terms," said Justice William Day
writing for the …
…
There was no internal contradiction
in the statute, but Comey read an added intent element into it
anyways befuddling a questioning American public and a Republican-led Congress
that was at its wits end to hear that the FBI Director had laid
out every piece of the case in an unusually transparent way,
but decided against prosecuting anyways.
…
Clinton Deemed too "Unsophisticated" to Pursue Charges
Against
It was at this point that Comey exposed what this case was really
about – Hillary was indeed a would-be defendant who was so criminally stupid,
bordering on complete incompetence, that it just didn’t seem right
to waste taxpayer dollars to whack her with an indictment. …
…
Too dumb to jail – there is
certain brilliance to the way Hillary wiggled out of this latest
scandal. READ
ENTIRETY (Clinton Too Dumb to
Jail: People Laugh as FBI Calls Hillary Unsophisticated; Sputnik International; 7/9/16
21:08 – Updated 7/10/16 04:01)
This all stinks as a Double standard when you read the ZeroHedge Link!!!!!
Tim Kaine sings the I
made a mistake, and I regret Hillary song and dance. Where was the
interviewer asking Tim Kaine how can you say Hillary knows she made a Mistake
when FBI Comey said she was too Unsophisticated to know she made a Mistake?????
[Blog Editor: The
Newbill link above begins at the 1:84 mark of the interview with Kaine. The embedded
video below represents the entire 4:15 minute interview]
VIDEO: Tim Kaine: I
Support Public Release Of FBI’s Notes On Hillary Clinton’s Emails (Full) |
TODAY
In an exclusive interview with
TODAY’s Savannah Guthrie, Hillary Clinton’s running mate, Sen. Tim Kaine, says
that in questioning Clinton’s physical stamina, Donald Trump is merely trying
to deflect attention from other issues. Interviewed along with his wife, Anne
Holton, Kaine also says that anything that is given to Congress in regard to
the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails should also be made public.
…READ
THE REST
+++
What we are watching ...
8/23/2016 12:38 PM
What we are watching evolve is a Lawless UN-accountability
that is forging a Dictatorship right in front of our American Rights!!! Hillary will be an Unimpeachable Dictator!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I never ask you guys (or gals) to
share anything, but dammit! share the hell out of this video! Hillary Clinton
says Mexico is a problem, Mexican Government policy is pushing immigration, US
needs to secure border, and illegals should be deported! #artoftheflipflop#trumpstalkingparrot#neverhillary
Transcript: "Mexico is such an
important problem. Mexico's policies are pushing migration North. There isn't
any sensible approach. What need to do is simultaneously, you know, secure our
borders, new technology, personnel, physical barriers, if necessary, in some
places, and we need to get tougher employer sanctions, and we need to
incentivize Mexico to do more. If they've committed transgressions of whatever
kind, they should be obviously deported. "
From a speech to the Council on
Foreign Relations in 2006. Only edited for time. The video and sound are
slightly out of synch. (Hypocrite Hillary
Clinton; Crooked Government on
Facebook; Posted 6/9/16)
The Clinton exploitation of Haiti
will eventually go up in flames, and when the smoke settles an emotional and
fiscal disaster of enormous proportions will finally be visible to the world.
It will be difficult to sift through the ashes to find truth, but the truth is
there. Follow the money, follow the pandering, follow the emails, and follow
the favors traded for gold.
Another email linked to Hillary
Clinton's pay-for play scandal involving State Department favors for the
Clinton Foundation has surfaced, but it is not one of Clinton's famously
deleted emails. A confidential email to possible capital investors for a $26.5M
fully operational open-pit gold processing facility in Haiti says it all.
"Haiti is geographically
located in a 'safe zone', within the sphere of U.S. influence. This sphere of
influence included Anthony Rodham, brother of the then-Secretary of State.
Anthony (Tony) Rodham served on VCS Mining's Advisory
Committee, "providing the company with strategic insight and
exposure to key high-level business and government relationships,"
according to a confidential document provided by a source.
…
Hillary Clinton's brother, Anthony
(Tony) Rodham was a prominent player in the mining scheme, according to
corporate VCS documents. Rodham has no background
in mining, no college degree, and his only qualification to be intimately
involved in a mining venture in Haiti was as the brother of Hillary Clinton and
the brother-in-law of the Special Envoy to Haiti Bill Clinton. Rodham joined
the advisory board of VCS Mining in October 2013 and the 2014 VCS memorandum
touts his influential connections to the Clinton's "inner circles"
and "power bases" within the beltway.
As the brother of the former 1st
(sic) Lady and Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the
brother-in-law of President Bill Clinton, Anthony is a well-respected American
public figure. For years a part of Bill & Hillary Clinton's "inner
circle", Mr. Rodham has worked side by side in the highest levels of U.S. politics
since 1974. His connections with big business, his access to international
influencers, and his connection to the power- base inside Washington (DC)
serves Mr. Rodham's clients well.
The memorandum also explains where
excess power generated by the internationally- funded Caracol Industrial plant
could go, and it was not to Haitian homes as promised by USAID and the Clinton
Foundation. On page 17, VCS Mining says "2.5MW of power will be supplied
to VCS by the Power Plant at USAID's Caracol Industrial Park, which has upwards
of 50% excess generating capacity."
This is a complicated story fraught
with intricate detail and begins with the fraudulent installation of a crooked
Haitian president, a Korean trade deal, an industrial park facilitated by the
Clinton Foundation, donations from the owners of the clothing behemoth, Gap,
Inc., and donations to
Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign from a Saipan clothing magnate with ties to
the Abramoff lobbying click here scandal. The
money trail and pay-for-play does not end with the transfer of the
all-but-impossible-to obtain Morne Bossa gold mining permit to VCS.
…
It would be scandal enough if Tony
Rodham and VCS benefitted from a gold mine permit in Haiti, but the potential
electrical power lines for that gold mine lead straight to one of the biggest
lies to come out of Haitian "reconstruction." Think of the Clinton
Foundation as covert commodities trader, whether it involves strategic
minerals, access for the garment industry, special trade deals, or the
guarantee that Haiti will always be held within the "sphere of
influence" of the United States.
…
…
Haitian people had a President installed by the Organization of American States
with the complicity of President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton.
Clinton would later write that
although the official 2010-11 Haiti Presidential vote tally was at odds with
results obtained by the Organization of American States (OAS), her goal was to
reach a "peaceful resolution." She did not admit that her
"resolution" would involve over-turning the official results. Clinton
termed this Machiavellian move, "democracy in action" in her book Hard
Choices. In the subsequent run-off using the OAS results, a
"celebrated musician," using Clinton's words, would become the next
President of Haiti. This was Clinton's premise of "good governance,"
and Michel Martelly would embody U.S. mastery of the disaster, becoming the
fulcrum for a new axis of foreign intervention and capitalism. The United
States had officially declared that fixing elections was "Democracy in
action."
As Clinton's Chief of Staff Cheryl
Mills said in email CO5779428 to Haiti
Ambassador Kenneth Merton and …READ
ENTIRETY (Recently Leaked
Documents Confirm Clinton Haitian Gold Scheme; By Georgianne Nienaber; OpEdNews.com;8/23/2016 at
14:43:30)
+++
Clinton Foundation Largest Unprosecuted
Charity Fraud in History-Charles Ortel
Wall Street financial expert Charles Ortel claims the Clinton
Foundation is the “largest unprosecuted charity fraud in world history.” He
also says this global fraud could not be pulled off without a lot of
help. Ortel explains, “I think this is an example of a vast left-wing
conspiracy. If you go back into the history, the Clintons always like to
expose the things that go down for their credit, and they always try to hide
the stuff that doesn’t make them look so good. When you go back into the
history of the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, and now Chelsea, have been
monetizing government service. They have been operating as Robin
Hood in reverse. Stealing from the poor to reward their rich cronies. . .
. I think what you have here is a case study on the proponents of the Clinton
wing of the Democratic Party, and they tend to be left-leaning, how these
people got together and figured out a charity where foreigners can give
unlimited amounts of money, and U.S. players can give unlimited amounts of tax
deductible money to an entity. …
… Ortel
charges on his website that “Clinton Foundation documents omit crucial facts,
include false and materially misleading statements, and exclude legally
required audits of financial statements for each year of operation, that must
be prepared on a consistent basis.”
Ortel goes on to say, “On the other hand, on charity fraud, it’s a very
different thing. In charity fraud, unlike pay-to-play, you don’t have to prove
intent. Under New York State law, in particular, the requirement
is merely that you prove the public filings in the Clinton Foundation are false
and materially misleading, and they certainly are. …
…
Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Clinton Foundation
researcher, Charles Ortel of CharlesOrtel.com.
How can we be about to reelect the Clinton
Crime Syndicate to the Highest Office of the USA?
9/5/2016 10:37 AM
The 1998
Clintons Crimes Syndicate against the USA that was part of Impeachment hearings
was a Lot more than Just Monica!!!!!!!!!!
Commercegate
Chinagate illegal sale of US Department of Commerce Trade Mission Seats for
campaign contributions, Judiciary Committee evidence, Judicial Watch interim
report on crimes and other offenses committed by President Bill Clinton,
December 1998
[Impeachment of
President William Jefferson Clinton - The Evidentiary Record Pursuant to S.
Res. 16 - Index to Senate Document 106-3, Vols. I-XXIV]
[Volume VII -
Transcript of October 5, 1998 presentations of David Schippers and Abbe Lowell,
and debate on H. Res. 581, beginning an impeachment inquiry. Committee Print,
Ser. No. 8, December 1998]
[From the U.S.
Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
106th Congress Document
1st Session SENATE 106-3
IMPEACHMENT OF
PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON
__________
THE EVIDENTIARY RECORD
PURSUANT TO S. RES. 16
VOLUME VII
Transcript of
October 5, 1998 presentations of David Schippers and Abbe Lowell, and debate on
H. Res. 581, beginning an impeachment inquiry.
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes
and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other
thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United
States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the
United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
three years, or both.
(b)
Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book,
document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes,
mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit
his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.
As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held
by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
…READ ENTIRETY (Title
appears some space after the “Search Form” text -18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal,
or mutilation generally; Cornell University Law School)
___________________
Edited
by John R. Houk
Text
or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
