I have been listening/watching a Vigilant Fox
interview of Christine Anderson on the Rumble
video format. With lengthy interviews my tendency is to listen
while I multitask with other Internet issues (e.g., going through the
massive emails I receive). The interview is awesome on an informative basis
but for me a little annoyed with the format of the Vigilant Fox
typing/interacting with Ms. Anderson with text. While multitasking I had to go
back to the video to read the question which Anderson responded to.
If you are an ANTI- Globalist Tyranny person as I am, you
are probably familiar about who Christine Anderson is. If you are just
awakening to how Globalism is restricting your Liberty or receive your
information from the Mockingbird MSM [Perhaps SEE: HERE,
HERE
(PDF), HERE
(CATO) & HERE
(RFK, Jr.)], you might be either less informed about Ms. Anderson
or possibly heard loads of negative propaganda about her.
Christine Anderson has her own webpage (HERE). Anderson’s ABOUT PAGE
explains her purpose free of Mockingbird Media baggage. Toward the bottom of
her ABOUT PAGE you’ll discover her German Political affiliation is the AfD (German
acronym which in English is Alternative for Germany). In the
Mockingbird Media the AfD is often belittled with negative connotation of Far
Right and Neo-Nazi when the truth is the AfD is simply Anti-Leftist and
Anti-Globalist agenda. Conservapedia has a great Info-Article on AfD.
The political climate Christine Anderson must endure as an
EU Conservative politician is she cannot rely on Rights Americans take for
granted enshrined (yet often shredded these days) in the American
Bill
of Rights – particularly the First Amendment. Using a Lord of the
Rings metaphor, she is probably a little Light in a dark political Mordor Land
of the Left.
And so, below is the 52:35-Minute Vigilant Fox-Christine
Anderson Interview.
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to
Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Christine Anderson has been a German member of the European
Parliament and a representative of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party
since 2019. She's one of the few politicians in the world who stood up to the
COVID nonsense, and I consider her to be one of the bravest people on the
planet. I asked her many questions on the topics of COVID tyranny, climate
change, bad actors, and more. These are her answers . . .
Timestamps:
0:00 - B-roll footage courtesy of The Highwire.
3:20 - Did the COVID measures fail? Did they want more out
of them?
8:54 - What was in Germany's secret manual to get people to
comply with COVID measures?
11:46 - How confident are you that you're on the right side
of history with respect to COVID and the shots?
13:56 - Thoughts on Trump’s recent remarks about the WHO.
15:25 - What happens if the WHO attains more power?
18:29 - How did you get into politics?
21:11 - How did you deal with personal attacks for going
against the COVID narrative?
22:27 - What are the problems with the EU?
24:44 - Should we ever trust the government?
26:40 - Who would have really resisted 1930s Germany?
32:05 - Is it a good idea to regulate the food supply in the
name of climate change?
40:08 - RAPID FIRE! What do you think about "X"
individual? (Justin Trudeau, Bill Gates, Donald Trump, and more)
50:39 - Follower Questions
51:21 - Will there be accountability for the crimes of
COVID, or will they be swept under the rug?
The Plandemic (the CCP-virus known as COVID) is/was a
disease that had ill-effects that were largely preventable by already existing
remedies that were vilified by greedy Big Pharma corporations wanting to make a
profit from their dangerous experimental mRNA Jab. THAT Plandemic – in my
opinion – was a three year practice on how to enforce tyranny on a fearmongered
world population.
Enter the planned tyranny to control the masses b plugging
them into surveilled yet restricted 15-MINUTED SMART CITIES.
Unsurprisingly, Smart Cities are being pushed as the next
convenience to make the human race a happy people. THE REALITY is for the
normal working person, the Smart City will be a despotism of control while the
wealthy Elites will have the freedom of mobility at the expense of the
controlled working human drones.
I begin with a short and long video on this emerging Globalist
tyranny followed by a couple posts shared in excerpt fashion and ending with a
lengthy yet informative post from A Lily Bit that you should read if for any
reason to know what to resist on an individual basis. It’s title, “Billionaires
Playing Sim-City: An Emotionless Look at the WEF's Great Reset—Spoiler
Alert, It's Still Bad”.
The Good Morning CHD show on May 5 divided the show
between discussions on Smart City Tyranny (largely with W. Scott McCullough)
and a World Health Organization (WHO) Globalist Power Grab via Pandemic
Treaties ending National Sovereignty (largely with Professor Francis A. Boyle).
At about the 60-minute mark MEP Christine Anderson is shown giving about
3-minutes on Smart City Tyranny (I’m actually giving Anderson a separate
video to place her first).
Thank you to those
who have stepped up! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100.
PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for
Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin
supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use
referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
**It's about control.** It's about Yeah, pretty much
imprisoning people in their assigned area. Why am I saying this? I mean, a lot
of people may say, Well, he or she goes against spreading, you know, conspiracy
theories. Well, look at what they're doing. They're where they're starting to
build these **15 minute ghettos.** They're not starting by, you know, a
building schools or hospitals or you know, leisure parks or none of that no
libraries. No, they **start by erecting barricades and installing surveillance
cameras. That is a big tell.** So anyone jelling me, it's about making my life
easier. Yeah. Right. Not for a single second, will I believe this BS it is
coming? And how will they control it? I mean, you know, all there is simple,
they will not no longer need electrified barbed wire fences all around this
this area, no digital idea. That will do it.
Take a look to China. That is our future. (If we didn't take
action)
Stephanie Locricchio hosts discussion on the tyranny of
Smart Cities and Pandemic Treaties. The program is Good
Morning CHD. This topic was posted 5/5/23. Here’s shortened url
of the original post: https://tinyurl.com/3749w279
Here’s the Good Morning CHD description:
Should we be concerned about our personal privacy? From
pandemic policies to smart technology, there is a clear effort to control the
human population. Three guests, well-versed on this topic, appear on ‘Good Morning
CHD’ to disclose the details of this imminent threat. Watch the episode on
CHD.TV!
Like with Covid, those questioning the Globalist agenda
and their new policed “climate-friendly” zone will be labeled “extremists and
conspiracy theorists.”
…
To seize further control of people’s lives, Globalists are
pushing the false idea that these cities will “save the planet” and help
all of humanity. Instead, they are nothing more than a way for them
to restrict, coerce, fine, punish, surveil, and limit the fundamental right of
freedom of movement for residents.
People do not realize that residents will only be allowed within
15 minutes of their home address, and violators will be fined. For example,
under the new proposals, if any of Oxford’s 150,000 residents drive outside
their designated district more than 100 days a year, they could be fined £70.
In addition, the government will track and control your every movement through
your smartphones & facial recognition technology, …
…
Globalists like to present their 15-minute cities as being
for the ‘people, environment, and the greater good. However, Hopkins warns that
these claims are nothing but a way to control people. Furthermore, these
restrictions come from high-placed politicians and wealthy institutions who do
not follow their own rules. And it was only after Covid lockdowns that the
previously unthinkable idea of confining people to their local areas for the
greater good was able to gain currency,” …
…
United Nations Agenda 2030
The “15-minute city” concept is crucial in the United
Nations Agenda 2030 and their Net Zero green agenda. The World Economic Forum
is also pushing this
new concept. Oxford, which has declared a ‘climate emergency,’ is hoping their
15-minute cities will help achieve the council’s ‘Net
Zero carbon Oxford’ vision by 2040.”
However, as RAIR Foundation USA previously
reported, “the socialists pushing these outrageous proposals care
much less about the environment than about controlling you.” UN Agenda 2030 is
nothing less than global government tyranny that enslaves all
humanity while calling the scheme “sustainable development” and
“equality.”
One needn’t be a card-carrying QAnon member to have fears
over these Trojan-like creations. Before going any further, it’s important to
get our definitions in order. As the political scientist Kelly M. Greenhill has noted, not all conspiracy
theories are wacky, and not all conspiracy theories are wrong. Take the
Watergate conspiracy theory, for instance, or the fact that Edith Wilson made
most of the executive decisions after her husband, President Woodrow Wilson,
suffered a stroke. Quite often conspiracy theories turn out to be accurate.
Also known as smart cities, FMCs [15-Minute Cities]
are places where everything imaginable, from your place of work to your
favorite pizzeria, is accessible either by foot or bike (not by car, though;
they will be verboten) in 15 minutes or less. What’s so bad about this?
… but these creations will also make it easier for those in
power to spy on us, to harvest our data, and enable Big Brother to become
Bigger Brother.
As I write this, FMCs are being actively
championed by the World Economic Forum (WEF), the group behind
the “Great Reset” and the idea of owning
nothing, having absolutely no privacy, and being very happy. This
fact alone should concern all readers.
…
FMC policies are currently being rolled out in cities such as Barcelona,
Bogotá, Melbourne, Paris, and the dystopian wasteland known as
Portland. What do these cities have in common? Surveillance technology. Between
now and 2040, cities right across the United States (and beyond) are predicted
to spend trillions of dollars on the installation of
additional cameras and biometric sensors. Sure, surveillance is bad now. But,
as Randy Bachman famously hollered, you ain’t seen nothing yet.
By 2050, more than two-thirds of the world’s
population will live in closely surveilled urban centers,
like glorified rats in cramped cages. Contrary to popular belief, we no longer
live in a panoptic society. When Jeremy Bentham, the English philosopher and
social theorist, put forward the idea of this prison system, there was no
internet. In truth, there weren’t even cars. We now live in a post-panoptic
world—a digital panopticon, if you will—with huge social media platforms
collecting personal user data before selling it to the highest bidder.
The companies running these platforms often work closely
with government officials, identifying supposed sinners and punishing them in
the swiftest of manners. As the writer Kylie Lynch has noted, these companies
know absolutely everything about you; they have instant access to your browser
history, your activity online, and now, rather worryingly, even your biometrics. Not surprisingly, these Big
Tech companies will have a big impact on the FMCs of the future, by providing
the underlying digital infrastructure needed to monitor us and ensure mass
compliance.
FMC are wolves in sheep’s clothing. Don’t believe the countless stories telling you
otherwise. It has become common for elitist, mainstream outlets to poke
fun at those who dare to question the “we have your best interests at heart”
narratives. We have been burned too many times before. --- READ
ENTIRETY
++++++++++++++++++++
Billionaires Playing Sim-City
An Emotionless Look at the WEF's Great Reset—Spoiler
Alert, It's Still Bad
Over the past few years, many publications in various forms
have (mine included)
warned about the World Economic Forum's (WEF) Great Reset agenda,
which aims to transform the international community into a techno-hierarchy
controlled by a stakeholder elite. Klaus Schwab, the Forum's president, is the
epitome of what Samuel Huntington described as the "Davos Man"
and "gold-collared workers" in 2004.
Huntington referred to these "dead souls" as
individuals who have renounced their national identity. In 1994, Christopher
Lasch observed that this elite had "abandoned their loyalty to
America." They view the world as their financial playground and have no
allegiance to any flag or border. CNBC later characterized the typical Davos Man
as wealthy, powerful, and, perhaps, disconnected, but primarily representative
of the global elite.
We have been blindly heading towards Schwab's Fourth
Industrial Revolution, or Globalization 4.0, for over three decades, starting
with the fall of the Soviet Union and the near silence of anti-globalization
protests following 9/11. When this new revolution began is relatively
unimportant, but two events at the end of the first Bush administration seem to
have inadvertently hastened its onset.
First, the Soviet Union's collapse destroyed the old
geopolitical landscape, which had divided the world into two military
superpowers. As US military supremacy grew, the era of neoliberal globalization
entered hyperdrive, and the Clinton administration's new generation of neoconservatives
sought to keep Cold War myths alive through NATO. Second, the aftermath of the
first Gulf War led to the launch of the digital age and the era of big tech and
social media when the World Wide Web went public in 1993.
NOT JUST A SCHWAB PRODUCTION, OTHERS ARE ALSO COMPETING
FOR CREDIT
It is an amateurish assumption to attribute the Great Reset
solely to Schwab. Many of its underlying principles are not new in theory.
Technologies such as 5G telecommunications, robotics and artificial
intelligence, data collection and surveillance, blockchain applications,
biotechnology and genetic engineering, and transhumanist visions were already
advancing and becoming more sophisticated exponentially.
A dozen years ago, urban theorist Richard Florida published
his book, The Great Reset: How New Ways of Living and Working Drive
Post-Crash Prosperity. Well before Schwab spoke about the opportunity
to reset human civilization during the Covid-19 pandemic, Florida's Reset
promised a better life without the "ownership of real estate, appliances,
cars, and all manner of material goods."
Several of Richard Florida's predictions, such as the shift
towards a renter economy from homeownership, are becoming a reality. This
transition is particularly important for large urban areas due to population
migration from rural regions. The United Nation's Agenda 20 and the WEF's
futurist strategies share many commonalities. In 2014, Dutch economist Willem
Middelkoop proposed The Big Reset in his book of the same
name.
Despite its significant global presence, the WEF has
achieved little as an international institution since its inception
in 1971. It is largely a
façade of human arrogance and self-delusion. Left to its own
devices, the Forum is a rather ineffective institution. According to Schwab,
the organization's sole purpose is to promote "dialogue between
stakeholders" and “does not engage in negotiations for treaties or policy
decisions.” Schwab once stated, "Elites have always existed. We bring
together people of influence, and we hope they use their influence in a
positive way." When questioned about whether the WEF could replace the
current multilateral international institutional structure, Schwab replied that
this was not the Forum's objective. Instead, the WEF aims to initiate reforms
from within the existing institutions.
The Forum functions as a massive clearing house that
assimilates a vast quantity of analytical reports, geopolitical analyses,
scenario exercises, and public and private symposia from a diverse range of
entities including governmental and multilateral organizations, financial
firms, transnational corporations, banks, NGOs, think tanks, and even
intelligence agencies and elitist institutions such as the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and
others.
Despite its global public profile, the Forum has not achieved
anything earth-shattering on its own, apart from providing a premier space for
the Davos elite, corporate multinationals, and financial magnates to network
privately and develop novel ways to preserve and advance a post-capitalist
technological agenda without significantly disturbing the parasitic neoliberal
framework upon which these entities depend. Nevertheless, the WEF is also
driven by a desire to promote a model for socioeconomic progress based on a
technologically driven regime that does not provoke significant disruptions
within the ruling elite class.
JACQUES ATTALI: THE OVERLOOKED FIGURE BEHIND THE GREAT
RESET
However, by keeping a low profile, the WEF has inadvertently
created a nurturing environment where some of the most infamous members of the
elite can initiate global disruptions and leverage them to further their own
nefarious agendas. Jacques Attali, a French
economist and social theorist, is a powerful and influential figure who is
often overlooked by critics of the Great Reset.
Despite being a senior consultant to French presidents
Mitterrand, Sarkozy, and a key player in Emmanuel Macron's election, Attali's
role in the globalist agenda remains largely unrecognized. In 1989, he founded
the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development with a mission to rebuild
the former Soviet republics into functioning capitalist democracies,
but he was later accused of gross mismanagement. Nevertheless, Attali is
considered one of the world's top global thinkers by prestigious publications
such as Foreign Policy.
According to Professor Valentin Katasonov, Chairman of the
Russian Economic Society, Jacques Attali's ideas and plans for a Positive
Planet Initiative align with many of Klaus Schwab's strategies for the Great
Reset. Some have even suggested that Attali may be the true "mastermind
behind the Great Reset."
Adopting a doctrine of radical scientific materialism,
Attali sees all human activity, including politics, agriculture,
transportation, technology, economics, human behavior, health, and medicine, as
nothing more than codes that govern “sets of rules.” In Attali's dystopian
vision of the future, all such codes need to be rewritten so that a
"living being" becomes “an object” and "an artifact.”
Ten years ago, Attali expressed his support for the
voluntary or involuntary implantation of radio-identification
chips to achieve universal traceability, creating an
electronic surveillance system that would allow the elite to
execute total control over our lives. Attali has also suggested that modern
medicine could be the foundation for future surveillance systems, which he
believes will enslave people for their own good through gentle and permanent
conditioning. Attali rejected the idea that his technological utopia was
Orwellian, instead believing in implicit totalitarianism with an invisible and
decentralized Big Brother. Attali has recommended a reduction in agriculture,
transportation, mechanical and chemical engineering, and widespread
decarbonization, all of which are outlined in Schwab's The Fourth Industrial
Revolution (which I have read, so you don’t have to).
In a recent appearance on China's state media, Schwab
praised the Chinese Communist Party's control as a role model for global
transformation. Attali's ideas and strategic plans coincide with Schwab's Great
Reset goals. His Positive Planet Initiative is also part of the WEF's network.
In his 2009 book The Crisis and After, Attali predicted an
“uncontrolled pandemic” and supported Bill Gates' pandemic strategies. During a
2021 TED talk, which was removed shortly after being posted, Attali supported a
technological readjustment of the human organism through vaccination, embracing
the doctrine of radical scientific materialism and advocating for the overhaul
and rewriting of all codes that govern human activity.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the US and the West
envisioned a new neo-capitalist age. According to Fukuyama's The End of
History, history was coming to a close and a neoliberal epoch was being
orchestrated by the US and its economic partners.
What better time is there to
write about the scam that is our money supply and banking system than now? The
public believes that all money is issued by and controlled by the government,
however this is untrue. All money is presently produced by private
corporations, i.e., banks, except for coins, which make up less than 0.05% of
the total amount of …
It's possible that a stakeholder surveillance state,
controlled by multinational corporations who develop and control technology,
may replace neoliberal capitalism and emerge as the new sovereign state,
reducing nation-states to subservience. In this scenario, the advancement of
technology and its benefits may not serve humanity and democratic ideals, but
rather lead to increasing enslavement of humanity, with humans serving
technology itself.
Historian David Baker, writing before the WHO declared
Covid-19 a pandemic, predicted various crises for the century, including
stagnant real wages, worsening health inequality, more riots and uprisings,
ongoing political polarization, and elites competing for limited positions of
power, among others. As we have seen in recent times, these predictions are
becoming reality.
The Great Reset agenda may lead to a counterrevolutionary
movement, orchestrated by a global elite, which seeks to upend neoliberalist
capitalism in order to usher in a post-capitalist era. Christopher Lasch warned
of such a revolution in his 1995 book, The Revolt of the Elite and the
Betrayal of Democracy, noting that the elites' desire to destroy the middle
class would result in a “war of all against all.”
It is important to note that post-capitalism is not
synonymous with Marxism, despite the misconception perpetuated by some critics
of the World Economic Forum. While they bear parallels, terms such as Marxist,
communist, socialist, and fascist (in their generally accepted meanings) fail
to accurately describe the Great Reset's larger vision. In fact, those most
closely aligned with the Fourth Industrial Revolution's techno-economic
ideology, such as Attali and Schwab, invert true Marxism into some weird
corporation-controlled cyberpunk dystopia that reuses ideas from classical
Socialism to keep people under control. [Blog Editor
Bold Text Emphasis]
It should be clear that the WEF's counterrevolution is not
rooted in genuine class struggle, nor does it support the proletariat worker's
fight against a powerful global bourgeoisie that holds opaque positions in
socio-economic governance as stakeholders.
The Reset revolution is orchestrated by the wealthy owners of capital,
rather than the average citizen, and as a result, it represents a new form of
oppression aimed at further destroying the middle and upper working classes. [Blog
Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
As banks and large investment firms like Blackrock continue
to devour real estate, tens of millions of homeowners and small and
medium-sized business owners are facing bankruptcy and property seizure.
The Dutch government's recent land seizures from farmers is
another illustration of this trend. Ultimately, the objective is to establish a
depopulated caste system that benefits an empowered elite class and its
privileged supporters. Below them will be a socially engineered caste made up
of masses of expendable “useless eaters.”
THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY: A CHOOSE-YOUR-OWN-DYSTOPIA
ADVENTURE AT THE NSA'S EXCLUSIVE SANTA FE CONFERENCE
At the invitation-only 2018 Santa Fe conference held by the
National Security Agency (NSA), attendees voted on their preferred or
anticipated outcome of four future scenarios for humanity in addressing the
world's impending crises.
The first and most optimal scenario portrayed
our civilization’s capacity to meet and solve every obstacle and crisis. The
second scenario was contingent upon a significant technological
breakthrough to enable modern civilization to overcome its most daunting
challenges. However, the attendees dismissed both this and the first scenario
due to the perceived lack of intelligence among Western political leaders, and
the belief that the most law-abiding citizens (i.e., middle and upper working
classes) are ill-equipped to assume the responsibility required to tackle these
challenges (which in an intentionally dumbed down society is not too
surprising).
The third scenario received the most
approval. It involves a controlled and orchestrated chaos, which aligns with
Klaus Schwab's preferred trajectory. This scenario is inspired by economist
Joseph Schumpeter's theory of “creative destruction” which sees innovation as a
force for revolutionizing the status quo.
The fourth, and second most popular scenario, was
called the "anthropological transition," which envisions a shift
towards a new social order where the divide between the upper and lower classes
is so great that it resembles the separation of different biological species.
This concept of a new caste system is embedded within the Great Reset as a backup
plan.
The World Economic Forum (WEF),
known for its annual meetings in Davos, Switzerland, is the most influential
platform for the super-rich and powerful. The WEF was not elected by anyone,
but for many years it has acted like the world government, regularly revealing
the plans that the Western power elites have for humanity. It has long been
clear that …
TRILATERAL COMMISSION: MAKING DEMOCRACY 'LESS DEMOCRACY'
SINCE 1975
The concepts and ideas put forth at the Santa Fe conference
are not entirely new, and have been discussed before in the Crisis of
Democracy report commissioned by the Trilateral Commission in 1975.
The report suggests that in order for a functioning democracy to exist, a large
portion of the population must become apathetic and disengaged from civil
action, and thus diminishing civil society’s public influence is essential.
This may require moving towards less rather than more democracy, and even the
destruction of the middle-class altogether.
Although the report was written almost half a century ago,
it was resurrected in the Trilateral Commission’s Summer 2019 report entitled
“Democracies Under Stress”. The 2019 report states that the Commission will
return to its roots and produce content as seminal and lasting as the Crisis
of Democracy report by Huntington, Crozier, and Watanuki.
The globalists have used the pandemic as an opportunity
to suppress individuality, critical thinking, and self-awareness among the
public. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] In this context, social movements
such as the New Woke, environmentalism, and gender identity have served as
predictable distractions co-opted by the same elites behind the Great Reset.
Critical Race Theory and identity politics have replaced genuine class
struggle, aligning with the system's agenda to replace democracy with mass
idiocracy. To achieve this goal, public control over social media networks
needs to be abolished, as demonstrated by the US Democrat and EU governments'
opposition to Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter.
Following Obama's 8-year presidency, the elite class had
high hopes for Hillary Clinton to rule for the following two terms, resulting
in a 16-year reign by established corporate Democrats. The success of the
globalist ideology's politicos and the implementation of the neoliberal project
for establishing the unipolar regime described in the Great Reset would have
been more likely during this time. Notably, Silicon Valley, a symbol of
technological autocracy, voted heavily for Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020.
A significant event occurred with the “unexpected” election
of Donald Trump, a maverick member of the elite class who, unlike his
predecessors, at first impression espoused nationalist views and advocated for
his country's sovereignty but ultimately fell in line with the globalists’
agenda goals, by installing deep state puppets as CIA heads and vaccinating the
nation. However, Trump was also opposed to international institutional
structures such as the UN, World Bank, IMF, and World Health Organization,
which he viewed as infringing on national sovereignty. But who doesn’t need
some good old controlled opposition to keep half the population in check and
the other half outraged over his hair and skin color and how he says “China”?
Trump's presidency was feared to be a departure from the
typical high-ranking clerks of his predecessors. He allegedly stood on the
margins and opposed the international institutional infrastructures that
encroach on nations' sovereignty, which hyperactive globalists like George
Soros, Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab prefer to demolish. These global elites
envision Schwab's stakeholder capitalism, which would put multinational banks,
corporations, and selected NGOs in charge of domestic and foreign governance.
Despite Trump's buffoonery, and the ultimate disappointment he proved to be, it
may have been a surreal blessing that interrupted the globalist agenda, gave
the middle class some extra survival time, and made people wake up to what went
on behind the scenes. Trump's presidency exposed the underbelly of the
globalist class and its connections to the deep state apparatus. [Blog Editor
Bold Text Emphasis]
However, Trump is not a suitable architect or leader for a
constructive counterattack against the new global order based on the Great
Reset's plans. Nonetheless, his presidency disrupted the tyrannical forces of
the new faux left and the wealthy powers that support it. [Blog Editor: I
too have questions about President Trump’s future efficacy as a leader, BUT the
continued efforts to prevent his return as President is evidence to me that
Globalist Elites and the Deep State fear his intentions. THAT WORKS FOR ME!]
The Great Reset and its accompanying ideology of stakeholder
capitalismrepresent a significant threat to democracy and
individual liberty. It is an agenda driven by a small group of megalomaniac
globalists who seek to demolish the state and national boundaries and replace
them with multinational corporations and NGOs governing domestic and foreign
affairs. The
pandemic has been used as an opportunity to push this agenda
forward and to shatter public self-awareness, squash individuality, and dumb
down critical thought.
While the Great Reset may be seen as a path towards a
sustainable future, it is one that comes at the
cost of personal freedom and sovereignty. As we move forward,
it is essential to remain vigilant of the power grabs by the global elites and
to protect our democratic values and institutions.
.jpg)
