SCOTUS, Gay Marriage and Need for Constitutional Amendment

Attempted Rape of Angel of God – Sodomites Struck Blind

John R. Houk

© September 8, 2014

On October 6, 2014, in an unexpected move, the United States Supreme Court declined to review petitions challenging the legalization of same-sex marriage in five states, including Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. The effect of this refusal to hear these petitions, or this non-decision on the legality of, or the right to, same-sex marriage for all 50 states, is that stays are now lifted on the three federal appeals courts’ decisions upholding such same-sex marriages. With these stays lifted, same-sex marriages are now legal in 24 states, up from 19.

Other states in those federal circuits are also affected by the Court’s actions on Monday, including Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming. It is thought that the three federal appeals court will uphold same-sex marriages in these states as well, where such marriages are currently banned. If those bans are struck down, then the number of states legalizing same-sex marriage climbs from 24 to 30 in short time. (The Supreme Court’s “Non-Decision” On Same-Sex Marriage: The Impact On Employee Benefits After 'Windsor'; By Jenny Kiesewetter; JD Supra Business Advisor; 10/7/14)

Activist Judges from the Lower Courts to the Appellate Courts have used the 14^th Amendment ratified in 1868 after the Civil War to drudge Leftist ideology for homosexual rights as if that was the Original Intent inclusively for the moral depravity of homosexuality becoming normalized in our society. The very slow process of acceptance of the normalizing of the homosexuality began in 1960s with gay PhDs and MDs pushing academic flawed research to counter the Word of the Creator of ALL that exists materially and spiritually.

… [I]t’s been 50 years since Alfred Kinsey published his infamous 1948 report, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, which has so profoundly and grievously affected not only American society, but the moral, social, and political order worldwide. It is difficult to exaggerate the horrendous effects of the widespread promotion and acceptance of his work. Kinsey’s "research" shook America’s moral foundations and launched the Sexual Revolution in the 1960s. Its terrible results are obvious in the skyrocketing incidence of all the social pathologies afflicting us today: divorce, abortion, sexual promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, illegitimate births, cohabitation, pornography, homosexuality, sadomasochism, rape, child molestation, sexual crimes of all types, family breakup, endemic violence, etc. We cannot hope to reverse this destructive, downward spiral if we do not recognize and openly confront the Kinseyite falsehoods and subversive premises and ideas that undergird popular attitudes and official policies today. (Fighting the Kinsey Fraud: Interview with Dr. Judith Reisman; Interview found at Whale.to [yeah I know – Conspiracy Theory Website]; Interview took place in 2005; Dr. Judith Reisman exposed Alfred Kinsey as a fraud in his experimental findings justifying homosexuality among many other challenging moral foundations)

Do you think homosexuality was even remotely acceptable as a normal lifestyle in 1868?

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [If 14^th Amendment stopped perhaps a stretch to a modern inclusiveness of gender more than race, BUT it is still a stretch and emancipated former Black Slaves is the Original Intent here and NOT same-sex normalcy.]

Section 2.

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state. [Nothing to do with gender here, but only voting age – which has since been amended as well.]

Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [AGAIN, nothing about gender in service of any form of local, state or federal government. Specificity is given to those members of Southern States that attempted to forcefully secede from the Union of the USA.]

Section 4.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. [No gender here but the promise of federal government to pay debts incurred during the Civil War but NOT any debts incurred by the rebelling Confederate States.]

Section 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. [Here it becomes a part of the rule of law to constitutionally enforce the civil rights to emancipated Black Slaves and not same-sex lifestyles. Based on Original intent, offering normalcy to moral depravity is NOT justified.] (Bracketed bold text is by this Blog Editor; 14th Amendment; present on Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute)

Unless you are a Leftist Living Constitution moron the 14^th Amendment wasn’t even close to extending normalcy and special civil rights for followers of a homosexual lifestyle.

GASP! This is where all the Leftist transformers and Homosexual rise up and paint a picture these sentiments as the words of a homophobe bigot. This is where I stand up and look depravity apologists in the eye and tell them first I don’t fear homosexuals and second I join feel safe in joining the Creator of all that exists that homosexuality among males and females is an abomination in the Creator’s eyes.

Practicing homosexuals should be grateful that the mercy of God extending by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ the Son of God extends forgiveness through faith in God’s Grace toward those who choose the Lord as their Savior and dedicate themselves to following Christ understanding that sinful passions are forgiven.

SHAME on the Supreme Court dodging the issue as a final authority in the rule of law by not looking at same-sex depravity and step up to the plate to make the right decision to join Nature’s God in upholding Natural Law to overrule activist Judges that validate UNNATURAL moral practices.

Here are some quotes/excerpts for Christian Bible Believers to think on when Leftists and Homosexual Activists distort the Truth in God to manipulate American opinion via a guilt complex imposition:

"Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences" describes the allegedly scientific research of Alfred Kinsey and colleagues, which largely shaped modern Western society's beliefs and understanding of the nature of human sexuality.

Today, half a century later, Kinsey's unchallenged conclusions are taught at every level of education – from elementary school to college – and quoted in textbooks as undisputed truth.

Incredibly, Kinsey's research involved illegal sexual experimentation on several hundred young children. And his survey was based on a non–representative group of Americans — including hundreds of sex offenders, prostitutes, prison inmates and exhibitionists. Yet Kinsey's grotesquely fraudulent research has served as the very foundation of modern "sex science," and his claim that one in 10 people are homosexual is central to the gay—rights movement. And now comes the greatest hypocrisy of all — the pretense of providing safe-sex instructions to children while in reality advancing Kinsey's agenda, including indulgence in high—risk lifestyles and behaviors. (Church History - the Homosexual age: [subtitle] Jesus warned us these times would come! – Subtitle by Dr. Judith Reisman; From BibleProbe.com)

*******

The Homosexual Agenda is a self-centered set of beliefs and objectives designed to promote and even mandate approval of homosexuality and homosexual ideology, along with the strategies used to implement such. The goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school, restricting the free speech of opposition, obtaining special treatment for homosexuals, distorting Biblical teaching and science, and interfering with freedom of association. Advocates of the homosexual agenda seek special rights for homosexuals that other people don't have, such as immunity from criticism (see hate speech, hate crimes). Such special rights will necessarily come at the expense of the rights of broader society. The homosexual agenda is the biggest threat to the right of free speech today.

…

Strategies and psychological tactics

Homosexual activists are often seen as engaging in specious argumentation, such as attempts to controvert the consistent teaching of the Bible on homosexual relations (see homosexuality and biblical interpretation), and using false analogies, in order to gain acceptance of homosexuality. One common argument used by homosexual activists seeks to compare their quest for equal rights to that of others.^[32] This argument is countered by the observation that blacks were able to peacefully argue that mankind should not be "judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character"^[33], as the former yields no certain moral distinction. In contrast, homosexual activists seek acceptance of an immoral practice(s), and in addition, engage in certain coercive and manipulative means to do so. This includes the use of demonstrative protests, which appear to be designed to censure and intimidate those who oppose them in any way.

…

Influence in the academic world

Professor Jerry Z. Muller described in an article titled First Things (Aug/Sept. 1993) how the homosexual lobby has gained widespread acceptance in the educational realm.

[Their] strategy has been remarkably successful. With a rapidity largely attributable in large part to a total lack of articulate resistance, homosexual ideology has gained an unquestioned and uncontested legitimacy in American academic life. Within the academy, as within nonacademic elite culture, the definition of opposite to homosexuality as "homophobia - a definition which implies that it is impossible to give good reasons for the cultural disapproval of homosexuality - is the best evidence of the success of this strategy.^[63]

… READ ENTIRETY (Homosexual Agenda; Conservapedia article entry; Last Modified September 10, 2014 at 19:26)

******************

“It is beyond dispute that when the 14th Amendment was adopted 146 years ago, as a necessary post-Civil War era reform, it was not imagined to also mandate same-sex marriage, but that is what the Supreme Court is implying today. The Court is making the preposterous assumption that the People of the United States somehow silently redefined marriage in 1868 when they ratified the 14th Amendment.

“Nothing in the text, logic, structure, or original understanding of the 14th Amendment or any other constitutional provision authorizes judges to redefine marriage for the Nation. It is for the elected representatives of the People to make the laws of marriage, acting on the basis of their own constitutional authority, and protecting it, if necessary, from usurpation by the courts.

“Marriage is a question for the States. That is why I have introduced legislation, S. 2024, to protect the authority of state legislatures to define marriage. And that is why, when Congress returns to session, I will be introducing a constitutional amendment to prevent the federal government or the courts from attacking or striking down state marriage laws. – Senator Ted Cruz via The Atlantic (Ted Cruz to introduce constitutional amendment on gay marriage after Supreme Court ducks appeals; By ALLAHPUNDIT; Hot Air; 10/7/14 2:01 PM)

*************************

“According to the majority of this very Supreme Court in the Windsor decision, states and their citizens have the right and responsibility to define their marriage laws. It is shocking that at least six Supreme Court justices would allow unelected lower court judges to simply ignore the majority decision – and the Section of DOMA upheld in the Windsor decision.

“The only alternative to allowing these unelected liberal judges to impose their morality on all of America is to pass a constitutional amendment. To that end, last year I introduced the Marriage Protection Amendment (HJ Res. 51) to define marriage as only between one man and one woman.

“Like so many other states, the citizens of Kansas made an overwhelming decision to stand for traditional marriage when they adopted the Kansas Marriage Amendment. No one justice – no one court – no elite judicial activists should be permitted to redefine or un-define marriage to suit their distaste for traditional marriage.

“This most recent non-decision by the Supreme Court clearly demonstrates the need for a constitutional amendment on this issue.” (Huelskamp: We need a Constitutional Amendment on Same Sex Marriage; By Post Staff; Salina Post; 10/7/14)

*******************

The Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) would amend the United States Constitution to protect marriage, family and children by defining marriage as the union between one man and one woman. Congressman Tim Huelskamp introduced the FMA on June 28, 2013.

… (Federal Marriage Amendment; By Tim Huelskamp Gov webpage)

******************************

H.J.RES.51 -- Marriage Protection Amendment (Introduced in House - IH)

HJ 51 IH

113th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 51

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 28, 2013

Mr. HUELSKAMP (for himself, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. PITTS, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. PITTENGER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. BARTON, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. JONES, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. HALL, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. WOLF, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. HULTGREN, and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein),

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the `Marriage Protection Amendment'.

SEC. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

The following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

Article--

`Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.'. (Bill Text: 113th Congress (2013-2014), H.J.RES.51.IH; Thomas Library of Congress)

JRH 10/8/14

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Sex Revolution Father a Homosexual Pedophile?

John R. Houk
© July 20, 2010

Alfred Kinsey is the Left Wing father of the Sexual Revolution. Research he worked on in 1930’s, 40’s and 50’s led to the degeneration of accepted sexual morals in America. Kinsey’s research stretched from heterosexuals, homosexuals, pedophilia and many more aberrant behaviors. Kinsey’s research sent his conclusions to the public as well as to science. Many of those conclusions gave the green light to behavior to sexual lifestyles beyond heterosexuality. Some would say, hence the blight of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, transgender and pedophilia sex on course to cultural acceptability over traditional Christian Morality.

Since the majority of scientists tend to filter their research through Left Wing thought patterns, Kinsey’s research is still cited by the majority scientific community as ground breaking discovery in sexual mores of the American. Unfortunately the acquisition of Kinsey’s data has pretty much been withheld from the public. For instance Kinsey’s homosexual subjects were recruited from an area of homosexual debauchery and not exactly a representation of America’s general population. Child sex and man/boy sex was observed of children forced into sex by noted pedophiles who exacted sex from both boys and girls. Sex crimes law enforcement in the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s was focused on prostitution with the overt investigation of pedophilia being nearly non-existent as an embarrassment of society to be buried out of sight.

The gal that has dedicated her life to exposing Kinsey as a morally corrupt man was on a mission to justify lifestyles that personally subscribed to. That gal is Dr. Judith Reisman. Reisman has written books and articles exposing Kinsey’s research as fraudulent. Thus Reisman has become a darling to social Conservatives as I. From my brief Google searching Dr. Reisman I discovered that scientists or psychiatrists/psychologists in general has condemned her research on Kinsey methods and life as a Right Wing political agenda insinuating that Conservative affirmation is good enough to discredit her. As if Kinsey’s Left Wing agenda to socially transform America into the acceptance of immoral and/or deviant lifestyles was a justifiable political path that science must accept as valid.

Here are the sentiments of Dr. William Simon on an earlier expose of Dr. Reisman’s mission to enlighten the public of the reality of Alfred Kinsey:

The second speaks to impact of this kind of "inflated" exposé on our research efforts. The impact of this work on the general public will be minimal, despite the excessive endorsement of a knowledgeable critic like Patrick Buchanan. At best it will have a short life in book displays typically also featuring works on Communist-inspired conspiracies involving fluoridation of drinking supplies, attempts to demasculinize North American men by lacing their food with excessive amounts of estrogens, and the martyrdom of Ollie North. The real damage will occur were we to take such critics too seriously, were we to any degree to avoid the controversial, were we to lapse into the needlessly mystifying and obscuring mumbo-jumbo jargon that researchers have too often used in the past to protectively cloak their vision of the sexual experience. This book should be granted nothing but contempt.

Simon’s conclusion reeks of distaste of Conservatism.

Here are a few excerpts of a 2004 review by Daniel Radosh writing for The New Yorker about Reisman opinions on Kinsey:

“Dr. Kinsey’s most egregious fraud is that he wasn’t a scientist,” Reisman said the other day. “He was an ideologue who was most importantly a sex offender at best, and, beyond being a sex offender, he was certainly a child sexual abuser and/or solicitor and guide in the perpetration of that abuse.” At the root of this accusation is an interview that Kinsey conducted with a sexual predator who kept detailed records of his activities with hundreds of women, men, and children.


But it is not simply Kinsey’s neutrality toward such people that upsets Reisman. She claims that Kinsey actively solicited pedophiles to molest children and report back to him. In fact, she said, “there is absolutely no reason to believe that Kinsey himself was not involved in the sexual abuse of these children.” (None of Kinsey’s four biographers have turned up any evidence that he was.) Reisman also believes that Kinsey died not from heart failure but from what she calls “brutal, repetitive self-abuse.”

To a reader of Reisman’s scholarly papers, it sometimes appears that there is little for which she does not hold Kinsey responsible. In her research on gays, for instance, she has written that the “recruitment techniques” of homosexuals rival those of the Marine Corps. The Kinsey paradigm, she holds, created the moral framework that makes such recruitment possible. Reisman also endorses a book called “The Pink Swastika,” which challenges the “myths” that gays were victimized in Nazi Germany. The Nazi Party and the Holocaust itself, she writes, were largely the creation of “the German homosexual movement.” Thanks to Alfred Kinsey, she warns, the American homosexual movement is poised to repeat those crimes. “Idealistic ‘gay youth’ groups are being formed and staffed in classrooms nationwide by recruiters too similar to those who formed the original ‘Hitler youth.’ ”

…

Ultimately, Reisman and her colleagues hope to discredit not only Kinsey but the entire field of sexology which he created, and what she calls “the sexindustrial complex” that has grown out of it. “One doesn’t measure American sexual habits,” she said. “That’s not a science.”

I look upon Dr. Judith Reisman as a heroine fighting the crusade to reestablish Judeo-Christian American values reversing the curse of Secular Humanism. I do suspect Dr. Reisman be uncomfortable with the “Judeo-Christian” accolade; nonetheless a fight to expose Kinsey will results in points for Judeo-Christian Morality. In fact I urge you to buy Dr. Reisman’s new book, “Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America”.

Two YouTube videos exposing Kinsey: HERE and HERE.

JRH 7/20/10
***********************************
Meet ‘sex sugar daddy’ to Polanski, pedophile priests, predators everywhere

About Dr. Judith Reisman
Sent by: WorldNetDaily Blogger Email
Sent: 7/20/2010 3:00 AM

Sex Crimes against Humanity

Behind the vaunted ‘research’ that incorporated, encouraged and justified the sexual abuse of children

They are the voiceless victims whose horror in many ways mirrors what children in concentration-camp “experiments” suffered during the Holocaust. But the mastermind behind such horrid crimes of sexual abuse and rape of children—some as young as 2-months-old—touts a legacy that’s lauded, lionized, bankrolled and celebrated in literature, science, industry and the arts.

Still, the perpetrator escapes even the scorn heaped on pedophile priests—though his work provides direct cover to the abusers.


So charges a shocking new book by an author who’s never allowed her critics’ tactics of ridicule and blackballing to silence her from exposing the darkest secrets of Alfred Kinsey’s sexual “research.” Dr. Judith Reisman’s relentless commitment to revealing Kinsey’s documented—yet studiously whitewashed—methodology will culminate Tuesday with the publishing of WND Books’ latest, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America.


Kinsey’s career, asserts Reisman, was founded on such unfathomable crimes against innocent children that its true nature must no longer remain unknown to the masses. Reisman aims straight for Kinsey’s watershed work—“Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.” Released 52 years ago, “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” attained academic acclaim and sparked mass shock and intrigue, selling 200,000 copies in its first two months of release.

“’Sexual Behavior in the Human Male’ and ‘Sexual Behavior in the Human Female’ provide abundant evidence of child sexual torture by Kinsey’s ‘researchers,’ who engaged in brutal, sexual experiments on children,” Reisman reports. “’Kinsey says ‘the only ‘abnormal’ sex is no sex; that the ‘human animal’ needs orgasms; and that the earlier boys and girls have orgasms, the better for them.’”


Reisman recently lifted the veil on the “global pedophile movement” in condemning the Swiss refusal to extradite Roman Polanski, the film director and three-decade fugitive who fled conviction for drugging, raping and sodomizing a 13-year-old girl. Reisman’s devoted much of her life’s work to telling the truth behind Kinsey’s research and revealing how he provides academic cover to sexually abuse—psychologically as well as physically—children.

Even in death, Kinsey’s sexual torment of children persists today, Reisman warns, citing the controversial sex-education curriculum pending in Montana. The Associated Press reports that in the Helena school district, “kindergartners would be taught proper anatomical terms, first-graders would learn sexual relations could happen between two men or two women, and fifth-graders would learn the various ways people can have intercourse.”

“Montana,” Reisman told EducationNews.org, “is seeking to impose an unscientific, Kinseyan ideological model of pathological sexual instruction on the undeveloped, immature brains of vulnerable children. …Their imposition of sexplicit and indeed deviant forms of sexual conduct on captive schoolchildren is institutional child sexual abuse. Were a man or woman to stop a child on the street and whisper the same information teachers will force on these school children, he or she could be arrested for child molestation.

“Since sex education only existed as ‘hygiene’ before 1950, (cleanliness habits and instruction to wait until marriage for sex unless one wanted to get VD),” she continued, “all sex ed had to come from some ‘expert.’ That ‘expert’ was Alfred Kinsey and his books.”

While many pinpoint the nation's seismic morality shift to the 1960s, Reisman presents different origins. Youthful rebellion, the rise of the counterculture and the Sexual Revolution remain mere symptoms of the cynicism that sprouted from the Kinsey Reports. The "Greatest Generation," Resiman (sic) maintains, absorbed a slander so damaging no jury could calculate the costs, as it inspired Boomers to see thier parents as perverted hypocrites.

“The World War II generation was trained to honor God, country, and family—and was thus trained to build a secure life for their children and, indeed, for us all,” she writes. “Kinsey … reported that nearly all American men—our ‘better angels’—were actually sex offenders, though he also claimed that no women or children were harmed by rape or incest.”

With attention lavished on Kinsey’s salacious charges of seldom-discussed sexual behavior as the closeted norm, few paused to ponder just how Kinsey drew such definitive conclusions about the sexual behaviors of children. Few except Reisman.

“’Sexual Behavior in the Human Male’ reports data “on 214 male children,” Reisman’s “Sexual Sabotage” reports, “the youngest only one year old. .. Kinsey asserted, ‘Of the 214 cases . . . all but 14 were subsequently observed in orgasm.’ Observed?! Who ‘subsequently observed’ (defined as ‘occurring or coming later or after’) these infants and boys being—yes—sexually tortured, timed, and recorded? Who, of Kinsey’s team, did this under his direction? The youngest boy tested to ‘climax’ is ‘2 mon.’ old.”

The pervasiveness of Kinsey’s research is pandemic, Reisman states, and even informs key advisors to the Catholic Church on matters of child sex abuse. One such advisor, Fred Berlin, MD, co-founded the celebrated Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic, with his mentor, John Money, PhD.

Money, “a dedicated Kinsey disciple” who mentored an early Kinsey Institute director, reports Sexual Sabotage, “said that their clinic was designed to offer ‘leeway to judges’ to free convicted child molesters.”


Tellingly, the Rev. Michael Peterson, founder of St. Luke’s Institute, warned clergy that they “should avoid potential abuse suits by following the well-qualified Money and Berlin.”
________________________
Sex Revolution Father a Homosexual Pedophile?
John R. Houk
© July 20, 2010
______________________________

Meet ‘sex sugar daddy’ to Polanski, pedophile priests, predators everywhere

Dr. Judith Reisman is a consultant and former president of The Institute for Media Education, and is the scientific advisor for the California Protective Parents Association. While her research and testimony prompted 7-Eleven to stop stocking Playboy and Penthouse magazines, she’s endured numerous attempts—including three congressional investigations—to squelch her findings on the dangers of pornography. A sought-after expert in the field of Media Forensics, Reisman served as a consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations. Having been interviewed on countless major media outlets, she’s also authored or co-authored several titles, including:

* Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People

* Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences

* Soft Porn Plays Hardball: Its Tragic Effects on Women, Children and the Family.

Copyright 1997-2010 WorldNetDaily.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.