DONATE

Tuesday, November 25, 2025

More on Crooked Clintons & Epstein Subpoenas

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© November 25, 2025

 

I learned yesterday James Comey and Letita James had their criminal indictments dismissed (READ HERE & HERE). NOT because of the evidence, but because a 4th Circuit Appeals Court Judge (appointed by Clinton) in Cameron McGowan Currie deemed the Prosecutor Lindsey Halligan an illegitimate appointee from the Executive Branch. Who assigned Currie? Fourth Circuit Chief Judge Albert Diazan Obama appointee.

 

I like the Mike Davis analysis of the Comey indictment from 11/13/25 and the White Collar Fraud analysis of the Letitia James indictment from 4/14/25. IF an American Civil War happens sooner than later, it won’t be over Dem-Marxist inspired Leftist violence and sedition. RATHER it will be over a Judicial Branch so corrupt, AMERICAN PATRIOTS will no longer value the legitimacy of the rule of law that ignores evidence over a Leftist Agenda.

 

On November 18 (2-days before my 69th birthday 😉), I shared a post about the Crooked Clintons ignoring a subpoena to appear before Congress to answer some Epstein questions. It was suggested the Crooked Clintons might claims Executive Privilege.

 

If the Clintons actually intend not to show up to testify, they should get the Bannon/Navarro treatment and be sent to jail for not complying to a Congressional subpoena.

 

The difference between Bannon/Navarro and the Crooked Clintons is that Bannon/Navarro actually had Executive Privilege issues (BannonNavarro) for questioning related to the Trump Presidency. I CAN NOT SEE how the Crooked Clintons could claim Executive Privilege related convicted sex-trafficker/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Does Executive Privilege protect as Classified knowledge of sex-trafficking and pedophilia crimes? That has to be ludicrous!

 

As of November 23, I have two posts that will act as updates on the Crooked Clintons testifying before Comer’s Committee in Congress:

 

o   Epstein Probe Targets Powerful Clintons

 

o   James Comer Demands Clintons Show Up for Depositions Regarding Jeffrey Epstein

 

JRH 11/25/25

ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com  

>>SHOP TAB<<

*****************************

Epstein Probe Targets Powerful Clintons

Crooked Clintons (usnewsmag.com Photo)

 

November 23, 2025 (date from email list rather than post)

usnewsmag.com

 

Subpoenas for Bill and Hillary Clinton in the Epstein probe signal a rare bipartisan push to demand answers from political elites and expose failures in government oversight.

 

Story Snapshot

 

§  The House Oversight Committee has ordered Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify in person about their ties to Jeffrey Epstein and federal handling of his case.

 

§  Both Republicans and Democrats support these subpoenas, underscoring bipartisan demands for accountability.

 

§  The investigation extends beyond the Clintons, targeting former Attorneys General, FBI Directors, and Department of Justice records.

 

§  No criminal allegations are made against the Clintons, but their testimony is seen as critical for transparency and legislative reform.

 

Congress Demands Accountability in Epstein Case

 

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, now operating under renewed authority, has issued subpoenas requiring former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to appear for in-person depositions.

 

The committee, chaired by Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), is probing the federal government’s conduct in the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically examining the Clintons’ knowledge of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s activities, as well as the effectiveness of federal prosecutions and anti-trafficking efforts. This move reflects widespread frustration with years of perceived stonewalling and elite protection.

 

Youtube VIDEO: Comer demands in-person depositions from Bill and Hillary Clinton in Epstein probe


[Posted by WTVQ

Posted on Nov 21, 2025

 

House Oversight Chair James Comer says the Clintons must appear for depositions in the Epstein investigation, warning of possible contempt proceedings.]

 

The committee’s actions mark a significant step for legislative oversight. On July 23, 2025, the committee approved motions to subpoena not only the Clintons, but also former Attorneys General, FBI Directors, and Department of Justice officials.

 

Subpoenas were formally issued in August, with the Clintons’ depositions scheduled for December 17 and 18, 2025. These developments follow months of negotiation with the Clintons’ legal team, as the committee insists on full compliance and warns of potential contempt proceedings if the subpoenas are ignored.

 

Bipartisan Support and Expanding the Investigation

 

While the committee is Republican-led, notably, the decision to issue subpoenas has received bipartisan backing. Both Republican and Democratic members agree that transparency and accountability are necessary, especially in high-profile cases involving public officials.

 

The investigation is not limited to the Clintons; it also encompasses other key figures in the previous administration and demands Department of Justice records, including communications with the former Biden administration. This broad scope suggests a determination to scrutinize systemic failures rather than scapegoat individuals.

 

Historically, congressional inquiries into the Epstein case have focused on non-prosecution agreements, lenient plea deals, and the inadequacy of prior federal investigations. The committee aims to address public outrage over these issues, seeking reforms to prevent future abuses and ensure government agencies uphold the rule of law.

 

The bipartisan nature of the effort demonstrates that frustration with elite impunity crosses party lines, and that Congress is willing to confront uncomfortable truths.

 

Clinton Responses and Public Pressure for Transparency

 

Bill Clinton’s association with Epstein traces back to documented flights on Epstein’s private jet in the early 2000s for humanitarian missions. Clinton has repeatedly denied any knowledge of Epstein’s criminal behavior and claims to have severed ties in 2005.

 

The Clinton Foundation has reiterated that any interactions with Epstein were strictly for foundation-related activities. Hillary Clinton is being called to testify regarding her knowledge of anti-trafficking efforts during her time as Secretary of State, as well as any relevant interactions with Epstein or Maxwell.

 

Despite no public criminal allegations against the Clintons in connection with Epstein, their testimony is seen as a crucial step for restoring trust in government institutions. Survivors of Epstein’s crimes and the broader public have demanded greater transparency and accountability, especially following Epstein’s suspicious death in custody and years of secrecy about his powerful associates.

 

The committee’s willingness to pursue high-profile figures signals an intent to break from past patterns of elite protection.

 

Chairman Comer has stressed that compliance with the subpoenas is non-negotiable, and that the committee will not accept further delays. He has warned that failure to appear could result in contempt proceedings, a move that underscores Congress’s resolve to reclaim its oversight role.

 

The outcome of these depositions could influence future legislative reforms aimed at strengthening federal investigations into sex trafficking and prosecutorial misconduct. While the Clintons have vast legal resources, the committee’s bipartisan support and public backing create strong pressure for full cooperation.

 

Broader Implications for Government Oversight and the Rule of Law

 

The current investigation stands as a test case for Congress’s ability to enforce accountability among political elites and federal agencies. In the short term, the subpoenas have reignited media attention and public debate over the Epstein case, and could result in new revelations about government failures.

 

Long-term, the proceedings may drive substantial reforms in federal oversight, enhance protections for trafficking survivors, and set a precedent for transparency in high-profile criminal investigations. For conservative Americans, this development aligns with calls to end government overreach, uphold constitutional checks and balances, and restore faith in justice by holding even the most powerful to account.

 

Sources:

 

o   Comer: Bill and Hillary Clinton Must Appear for In-Person Depositions

 

o   Chairman Comer Subpoenas Bill and Hillary Clinton, Former U.S. Attorneys General and FBI Directors, and Records Related to Jeffrey Epstein

 

o   Relationship of Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein

 

o   Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein: What We Know

 

© 2025 US News Mag. All Rights Reserved.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

James Comer Demands Clintons Show Up for Depositions Regarding Jeffrey Epstein

 

By Anthony Gonzalez

November 23, 2025

Resist The Mainstream

 

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) is turning up the heat in the Jeffrey Epstein probe, ordering former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to sit for depositions next month.

 

Comer first subpoenaed the Clintons in August. Their attorney responded earlier this month, offering only a “written proffer of what little information” they have. Comer rejected it, demanding in-person testimony.

 

“Given the admission that your clients possess some relevant information, your position amounts to a demand that the Committee forgo in-person testimony,” Comer wrote.

 

Comer emphasized that the focus isn’t on their official duties, but their personal relationships with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

 

Bill Clinton is scheduled for deposition at 10 a.m. on Dec. 17, with Hillary Clinton following at 10 a.m. the next day.

 

Legal experts note they may try to claim executive privilege, though its application to private matters is uncertain.

 

The Clintons’ ties to Epstein are well-documented, as the Conservative Brief reported.

 

Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” multiple times.

 

Epstein attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding.

 

Hillary Clinton received campaign donations from Epstein before his 2008 guilty plea for soliciting a minor.

 

Comer’s probe follows the release of 23,000 Epstein emails, texts, and documents this week, revealing contacts with high-profile figures including former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, Delegate Stacey Plaskett, White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

 

Epstein visited the Clinton White House more than a dozen times, and Bill Clinton has claimed he “had not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade” before Epstein’s 2019 arrest.

 

Clinton attorney David Kendall described Epstein and Maxwell’s actions as “abhorrent” but said the Clintons “have little to contribute” beyond what can be submitted on paper.

 

Several former officials subpoenaed in August submitted written statements instead of appearing.

 

That list included former Attorneys General Merrick Garland, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Jeff Sessions, Alberto Gonzales, and former FBI Directors James Comey and Robert Mueller. Only former AG Bill Barr appeared for questioning.

 

Epstein was indicted on federal sex trafficking charges in July 2019 and died in his Manhattan jail cell the following month. The Justice Department concluded no third parties could reasonably be charged and said Epstein didn’t maintain a “client list” or blackmail material.

 

Comer insists the Clintons hold unique information vital to understanding Epstein’s network, and he is prepared to compel their testimony.

 

X-Tweet: https://x.com/RepJamesComer/status/1991877484208595253

© 2025 Resist the Mainstream

No comments:

Post a Comment