The implications in this ZeroHedge
article revealing a scientific study that COVID-19 was “Designed To
Infect Humans” indicates no biolab infectious disease accident but a
biolab bioweapon accident at best and potentially a bioweapon unleashing.
JRH 5/26/20
Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit,
check
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal
account:
Or support by getting in the Coffee from
home business –
OR just buy some
FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.
******************************
"Like It Was Designed To Infect Humans":
COVID-19 'Cell Culture' Theory Gains Steam
By Tyler
Durden
5/26/2020 - 05:30
A scientific study which found COVID-19 may have been a
"cell-culture" uniquely adapted for transmission to humans (more so
than any other animal - including bats), is gaining steam.
The paper, currently under peer review, comes from Flinders
University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, who has spent over two decades
developing vaccines against influenza, Ebola, and animal Sars. He says his
findings allow for the possibility that COVID-19 leaked from a laboratory,
according to Sky News.
"The two possibilities which I think are both still
open is that it was a chance transmission of a virus from an as yet
unidentified animal to human. The other possibility is that it was an
accidental release of the virus from a laboratory," said Petrovsky, adding
"Certainly we can’t exclude the possibility that this came from a
laboratory experiment rather than from an animal. They are both open
possibilities."
Professor Petrovsky, who is the
Chairman and Research Director of Vaxine Pty Ltd, said COVID-19 has genetic
elements similar to bat coronaviruses as well as other coronaviruses.
The way coronavirus enters human
cells is by binding to a protein on the surface of lung-cells called ACE2. The
study showed the virus bound more tightly to human-ACE2 than to any of the
other animals they tested.
“It was like it was designed to
infect humans,” he said.
“One of the possibilities is that
an animal host was infected by two coronaviruses at the same time and COVID-19
is the progeny of that interaction between the two viruses. -Sky News
"The same process can happen in a petri-dish,"
added Petrovsky. "If you have cells in culture and you have human cells in
that culture which the viruses are infecting, then if there are two viruses in
that dish, they can swap genetic information and you can accidentally or
deliberately create a whole third new virus out of that system."
"In other words COVID-19 could have been created
from that recombination event in an animal host or it could have occurred in a
cell-culture experiment."
In January, Petrovsky began modeling the virus to try and
create a vaccine candidate. According to the report, he then began to explore
"what animal species might have been involved in the transmission to
humans" in order to better understand the origins of the virus, when he
discovered how well it infects humans over other species.
"We found that the COVID-19 virus was particularly
well-adapted to bind to human cells and that was far superior to its ability to
bind to the cells of any other animal species which is quite unusual
because typically when a virus is well-adapted to an animal and then it by
chance crosses to a human, typically, you would expect it to have lower-binding
to human cells than to the original host animal. We found the opposite so that
was a big surprise," he said.
When asked why mainstream scientists are still clinging
to the theory that the virus originated in a Wuhan wet market, he said that
scientists "try not to be political" but that that scientists who
support the lab escape theory risk negatively impacting their industry with tighter
laboratory controls.
"For instance, if it was to turn out that this virus
may have come about because of an accidental lab release that would have
implications for how we do viral research in laboratories all around the world
which could make doing research much harder," he said, adding "So I
think the inclination of virus researchers would be to presume that it came
from an animal until proven otherwise because that would have less
ramifications for how we are able to do research in the future. The alternative
obviously has quite major implications for science and science on viruses,
not just obviously political ramifications which we’re all well aware of."
Petrovsky has called for immediate investigation now, and
not when the pandemic is over - calling any delay in fact finding a
"mistake."
"I’m certainly very much in favour of a scientific
investigation. It’s only objective should be to get to the bottom of how did
this pandemic happen and how do we prevent a future pandemic…. not to have a
witch-hunt."
______________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment