Posted by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
July 22, 2023
Today’s theme is Medical Tyranny and One-World Government
(OWG). The OWG aspect looks at the tentacles of the World Health Organization
(WHO) Globalist designs to impose rule and Elitist agenda upon sovereign
nations. In the case of the USA that means erasing the already diluted Rule of
Law in the U.S. Constitution.
I begin with a couple of videos on Medical Tyranny. The
first I uploaded from Telegram which I believe was originally entitled “red
alert”. I changed the title in my Bitchute upload to reflect the coverup
lies being erased. The second video is roughly 37-minutes long but the report
in the first 12-minutes focusing on Dem-Marxist attempted censorship of Robert
F. Kennedy, Jr. at Congressional testimony by twisting a biological fact to
falsely accuse RFK, Jr. of racist Antisemitism.
The OWG posts are originally sourced from THE EXPOSÉ but one of those is
primarily from David Bell on the Substack page PANDA
Uncut. Followed by an exposition on a Peter
Sweden/Noor Bin Ladin interview on WHO power-grab and surveillance.
AGAIN, do some critical/independent thinking realize your
government and the media lies to YOU to transform your society and culture.
JRH 7/22/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My
Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is
pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
*********************
Bitchute VIDEO: Medical Journals Erasing
Evidence of Wrongdoing (Telegram)
Posted by SlantRight2
First Published July 22nd, 2023 14:05 UTC
Telegram Channel FreedomTirade (https://t.me/FreedomTirade) shared
this video on another Telegram channel which I cannot recall. I felt it was
important enough to download and then upload it to my Bitchute Channel.
FreedomTirade Description 7/21/23:
red alert. 🔺
the perpetrators of the COVID fraud are erasing their
tracks, by deleting hundreds of "scientific" papers which they used
as the basis to justify the brutal unethical COVID 'MEASURES'...
from lockdowns to injections.
red alert.
Mainstream media is ignoring this aggravated medical fraud:
First, they tried to hide the 'vaccine' harms.
Then they tried to hide the lies that they used to push the
'vaccines'
Montage on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/RED-ALERT:6?r=
In the words of the duplicitous demon Hancock at the UK
COVID INQUIRY (cover-up), they're planning to be "better prepared"
for the "next pandemic" to install tighter restrictions so to further
rob us of our freedoms in pursuit of their endless wars and total control.
we resist,
we defy,
we do not comply.
STOP THE MEDICAL FRAUD
STOP THE WARS
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE
HeuRiStiC mOnTagE [odysee Channel: https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f]
++++++++++++++++
Bitchute VIDEO: RFK JR. REVEALS CENSORSHIP
PLOT AGAINST HIM
Posted by Right2Freedom
First Published July 21st, 2023 09:21 UTC
Jul 20, 2023
Source: www.theepochtimes.com/rfk-jr-reveals-censorship-plot-against-him_5412546.html
++++++++++++++++
[Blog Editor: This next cross post will be the intro
portion (2-paragraphs) from THE EXPOSÉ then the full David Bell Substack
post]
The insane and dangerous One Health cult that regards
humans as a pollutants
[Intro by] RHODA WILSON
JULY 22, 2023
The idea of a holistic concept of health – that our
environment influences our well-being – is far older than written history. “One
Health,” a modern term for this holistic approach to health, is therefore old
news. However, just as planes are hijacked for politics or profit, One Health
has been hijacked by self-proclaimed philanthropists.
This hijacked and corrupted version of One Health is designed
to use fear to control us and justify our restriction, impoverishment and
death. It is a cult based on fear of the world and the people who they say
poisoned it. And it is baked into the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”)
proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and Pandemic
Treaty.
††††
One Health, holistic medicine, and the poisoning of minds
The narrative envisioning a world in which any
lifeform is considered of equal worth to others and humans a pollutant
By David Bell
July 21, 2023
The idea of a holistic concept of health – that our
environment (or ‘biosphere’) influences our well-being – is far older than
written history. So is greed, abuse, lust for power, and a desire to own and
enslave others. There is, regarding what really matters, nothing new under the
sun.
Ant-Consumed Rotten Apple [PANDA Uncut Photo]
‘One Health’, a modern term for this holistic approach to
health, is therefore old news, as is a willingness to corrupt and manipulate
such a concept for personal gain. Ill health is a lever for fear, and death
even more so, especially to those who believe that we are simply organic
constructs that end in dust and decay. A cult feeding off these fears, holding
that the entire biosphere is threatening us with diseases and death, would
therefore have real potential for mass control. Convince followers that humans
are the poison that made this world so destructive, and you will also have a
means to stoke hate against non-believers whilst adding guilt to the tools for
compliance.
A cult based on fear of the world and the people who poisoned
it, dressed up in philanthropy and virtue, has risen amongst us. Co-opting One
Health terminology, it is now funded by the spoils of Covid, and empowered by
technology that can take this mediaeval witch-hunting sect global.
One Health as a tool for humanity
If bovine tuberculosis spreads through a herd, the herders
will suffer through loss of income and food, and through the risk of catching
the infection themselves. Their poverty will compound, their kids go hungry,
and they will grow up to face the same fate. Improving the health of the herd
can uplift the family and their community to a better future. If they can
ensure their drinking water is clean, and their cooking fire does not pollute
their lungs, they will go even further. The environment, everywhere, should be
managed and protected for human benefit – physical, mental, and social.
The One Health concept, centred in such common sense, was
once no more than this. It is a rational way to express an age-old principle in
a world obsessed with allopathic medicine and magical vaccines. Sanitation and
improved nutrition will save more lives than the next round of profiteering
brought to us by Pfizer.
However, humans are humans, and just as planes are hijacked
for politics or profit, One Health has been hijacked by self-proclaimed
philanthropists. We should fear both, in a sensible way, but still fly on
planes and still support holistic medicine. To make flying more secure, we seek
to identify the hijackers and understand their motives. So, we should do the same
when concepts such as One Health are hijacked or co-opted with similar intent.
As a new catch-all for this modern public health cult, One
Health is being corrupted in two ways, but for the same ends and by much the
same people. Understanding one tells us about the people we are dealing with,
the other reveals their motives.
One Health as an ideology
The medical journal Lancet explained
the ideology [Blog Editor: i.e., Explains from a Woke-Elitist
perspective] of those driving the One Health cult in January 2023:
“All life is equal, and of equal
concern”,
and further:
“One Health will be delivered in
countries … by taking a fundamentally different approach to the natural world,
one in which we are as concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and the
environment as we are about humans.
In its truest sense, One Health
is a call for ecological, not merely health, equity.”
The narrative, and its intent, are clear. Those pushing it
envision a world in which any lifeform is considered intrinsically of equal
worth to others. If you must choose between your daughter and a
rat, the choice should weigh the probability of the survival of
each, or assess which may do the least harm to other lifeforms after being
saved.
Within this ‘equitable’ worldview, humans become a
pollutant. Ever-growing human populations have driven other species to
extinction through environmental change, from the megafauna of ancient
Australasia to the plummeting insect populations of modern Europe. Humans
become a plague upon the earth, and their restriction, impoverishment and death
may therefore be justified for a greater good.
It is difficult for people to grasp that this is a guiding
ideology of public figures, as it runs counter to most human moral systems
or Natural
Law. People therefore consider this a misrepresentation of what is
intended. If this is you, go back and read those quotes, and read more widely.
We must understand the ideology driving this movement, as they intend that we
should follow their dictates, and they intend to indoctrinate our children.
One Health as a tool for fear manufacturing and control
In the hijacked version of One Health, designed to control
the masses, humans are at constant risk of harm from their environment and must
be corralled and protected for their own good. To convince them, people are
bombarded constantly with reminders of the risk that a life on earth entails.
Changing climates, vehicle exhaust, variants of viruses, and the behaviour of
non-conforming others become existential threats.
Fear works to change human behaviour and shape responses.
During Covid-19, behavioural psychology units attached to governments used
fear extensively to lead people into compliance with dictates such
as mask wearing and stay-at-home orders. People will undertake actions, or
accept restrictions, that they would likely refuse if allowed to think
rationally and calmly. Expanding this approach from a single virus to any
aspect of the biosphere impacting human well-being, such as climate, provides
an opportunity to use this totalitarian tool of population control to reshape
society to the model that
the purveyors of fear desire.
Through amendments to
the International Health Regulations (IHR) and a
new ‘pandemic
treaty’, WHO is coupling this broad definition of One Health with a
definition of ‘emergency’ that simply requires recognition of a threat rather
than actual harm. When applied to WHO’s broad definition
of health, being ‘physical, mental and social well-being’, almost
all aspects of normal life could be included in its scope. Addressed through a
proscriptive public health paradigm that encompasses global
mandates, restrictions and censorship, those running this agenda
have an opportunity for unprecedented power.
The refocusing of WHO
Public health does not have to be this way. Combining WHO’s
broad definition of health with a holistic view of its relationship with the
environment could provide a readily defensible approach to true human
well-being. A further concept, ‘social capital’, is intrinsically tied to this;
that we are better off, and have greater well-being, when we work through
supportive social networks that value our participation in decision-making.
This is the opposite of being told what to do or how to live; i.e., being a
slave. People generally live
longer, are happier, and report more fulfilled lives when they have greater
social capital.
Combining a broad definition of health and a holistic view
of its dependencies with a requirement to ensure human agency (preserving
social capital) helps us understand how the discipline of public health could
effectively contribute. If it provides evidence and support for decision-making
at a community and individual level, it should contribute to well-being. If it
uses top-down coercion or mandates, it will support the wellbeing of those
doing the mandating, but harm those whose social capital is being degraded.
Slave-owners live longer than slaves.
Recognising these realities, in 2019 WHO stated in its recommendations for
pandemic influenza that border closures, quarantine, and prolonged business
closures should never be undertaken in response to a pandemic. These measures
would drive inequality and disproportionately harm low-income people,
destroying both economies and social capital. In 2020, refocusing priorities on
a new constituency, WHO promoted these same inequitable policies it had
previously warned against. The evidence did not change, but the constituency
did. Wealthy people and corporations had become significant funders of
WHO, able to dictate where its resources were used. It is clear that those who
benefit from improved nutrition and sanitation cannot fund WHO’s growing staff,
but those profiting from the largesse of the Covid response can.
We tend to think such changes cannot happen in free and
rational societies. To be convinced, we might need solid evidence of real
totalitarian control. If we experienced mandated population-wide injections,
people banned from visiting loved ones, or body-armoured police shooting at
crowds and beating up old ladies for not wearing masks, whilst those promoting
such policies lived and travelled freely, then we might start to wonder whether
our preconceptions regarding society were wrong. At that time, we might start
to believe that some in authority don’t really have our best interests at
heart.
Exposing a cult
Evil is not defeated by hiding from it. It is fought by
exposing the ideology that drives it – the greed, the lies and the deceit. We
should not be overwhelmed by the scale and depth of wrongdoing. It may now be
global but the people running it are as empty as those in past times, seeing
the subjugation of others as the only way to address their internal
inadequacies. Many more go along for the ride, doing their bidding to secure
careers and pensions. This is normal, and has been faced before.
In the end, mad ideologues collapse under the weight of
their own deceit and the shallowness of their dogmas. The earth-mother religion
of a corrupted One Health and the feudalist ambitions of its priests will be no
different. We should not fear public health or a holistic view of the world.
They are ours and can be a force for good. Rather, we should expose the
hollowness of the people who would subvert them, driven by their own greed and
barren ideologies.
Support our
independent insights with a donation. Click here.
© 2023 PANDA
Knowledge Factory NPC
PANDA Uncut HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/PLEDGE-SUPPORT
PANDA Uncut
+++++++++++++++
WHO’s power grab through surveillance and “triple
billion” targets
Bandage-Earth - WHO Tyranny - Featured image: WHO triple billion target updates: unveiling new health reforms, Health Europa, 7 March 2019
By RHODA WILSON
July 21, 2023
During an interview with Peter Sweden, Noor Bin Ladin
exposed how the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) does not care about your
health, but instead, it acts as a globalist organisation under the United
Nations (“UN”) to bring about centralised control. She discussed how the aim
has been the same for the past 100 years, WHO’s grand designs for surveillance
and its “triple billion” targets.
Together with Nick Cerutti, Noor Bin Ladin founded We Hurt Others, a
website to help disseminate information about WHO’s true intentions and
machinations. You can follow Bin Ladin on Twitter HERE.
[Blog Editor: THE EXPOSÉ embeds the Rumble video of
the interview and provides a link to Youtube. I suspect it is due to the
potential of censorship. I’m doing it the other way around.]
Youtube VIDEO: The
TRUTH about their secret globalist agenda
[Posted by PeterSweden
Posted Jul 20, 2023
Watch my interview where Noor Bin
Ladin reveals what the real plan is for the WHO and their origins. Follow Noor:
https://twitter.com/NoorBinLadin
The video above can also be found, for the time being, on Rumble HERE.
The globalists have been building an infrastructure
throughout the 20th century and the UN is very much part of that
infrastructure, Bin Ladin explained in the video above. With the setting up of
the UN, they were able to go ahead with the centralisation of power towards a
One World Government. And WHO is very much a key part of the globalist
structure. But this plan began long before the UN or WHO were founded.
The League of Nations was established at the end of World
War I to create a One World Government. The League, like its successor the UN,
had a health organisation that was driven by philanthropists and their
foundations – specifically the Rockefeller Foundation International Health
Board.
Public health became the ideal
vehicle through which Rockefeller philanthropy could apply scientific findings
to the public good.
Rockefeller’s business,
scientific, and philanthropic advisers Frederick T Gates, Charles Wardell
Stiles, and Wickliffe Rose perceived anaemia-provoking hookworm disease to be
both a key factor that explained the economic “backwardness” of the USA’s
southern states and an impediment to its industrialisation. These men helped
orchestrate the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for the Eradication of Hookworm
Disease that operated from 1910 to 1914.
This campaign uncovered the
possibilities of public health in eliminating the disease through an
anthelmintic drug; the promotion of shoe-wearing and latrines; and public
health propaganda. Following this success, the [Rockefeller Foundation] created
an International Health Board, which was reorganised as the International
Health Division (IHD) in 1927.
The
Rockefeller Foundation and the international health agenda, Anne-Emanuelle
Birn and Elizabeth Fee, The Lancet, 11 May 2013
Although US President Woodrow Wilson was an enthusiastic
proponent of the League, the United States did not officially join and so the
plans for a centralised world government failed, for which we must thank the
American public. As Bin Ladin explained, the USA didn’t join the League because
the American population was against it; at the time the US legislature was not
corrupt as they are today, meaning politicians followed the will of the people.
The League
was formally liquidated in 1946. By this time, discussions had
already taken place to create a new successor organisation – the UN. At a conference
in San Francisco in 1945, delegates from 46 nations – nations
which had declared war on Germany and Japan and had subscribed to the UN
Declaration – met and agreed on the UN Charter and the Statute of the new
International Court of Justice. On 24 October 1945, the UN came into
existence.
When country representatives met to form the UN in 1945, one
of the things they discussed was setting up a global health
organisation. WHO’s Constitution came into force on 7 April 1948.
The Narrative Has Been the Same For 100 Years
Bin Ladin found correspondence dated in 1922 from a Director
of the Rockefeller Foundation International Health Board to his colleague
stating that “we needed to recognise the limitations of nation-states in
dealing with certain health matters of an international nature.”
“The narrative 101 years ago … was exactly the same as the
narrative that they’re using today … that these so-called health emergencies
and these so-called pandemics show that there needs to be international
coordination and there needs to be a supranational body like the WHO in order
to manage, respond, prepare [and] prevent,” Bin Ladin said.
Further reading: Rockefeller
Foundation International Health Board, Re:Source, 6 January 2022
Now they are working on a Pandemic Treaty and amendments to
the International Health Regulations which will allow them dangerous levels of
control over individual nation-states. These instruments will hand power to WHO
to, for example, impose vaccine passports and censor what they deem to be
“misinformation.” “They are using covid as the excuse to further
crackdown on our liberties and using it as a justification to implement their
agenda,” Bin Ladin said.
According to Bin Ladin, the word “surveillance” is key to
everything WHO is wanting to implement. Behind the mask of “health,” WHO
is ushering in a mass surveillance and total control system.
Triple Billion Targets
In the video above, Bin Ladin highlighted WHO’s triple
billion targets. In March 2019, WHO announced “the most wide-ranging reforms in
the Organisation’s history”:
The changes are designed to
support countries in achieving the ambitious “triple billion” targets that are
at the heart of WHO’s strategic plan for the next five years: one
billion more people benefitting from universal health coverage (UHC); one
billion more people better protected from health emergencies; and one billion
more people enjoying better health and well-being. [Emphasis our own.]
WHO
unveils sweeping reforms in drive towards “triple billion” targets,
World Health Organisation, 6 March 2019
The first target regarding universal health coverage is
about centralising and making the entire health care system uniform, globally,
Bin Ladin said. “And with that, we’re looking at the digitisation of the
healthcare infrastructure.” Bill Gates’s global digital ID will come into play
here.
The second target regarding protection from health
emergencies is where the amendments to the International Health Regulations,
the Pandemic Treaty and the surveillance programme come in.
The third target of better health and well-being is “so
vague and broad,” Bin Ladin said. “This is about broadening the WHO’s mandate …
[to include] different health emergencies and [health emergencies] related to
climate as well. This is the One Health agenda.”
Bin Ladin highlighted some text from WHO’s Triple Billion
targets:
Two words – measurable impact –
are at the heart of WHO’s plans to transform the future of public health. The
focus is on using timely, reliable, actionable data to improve the health of
billions of people. The Triple Billion targets are fundamental to how this plan
will be achieved and monitored.
Crucially, the Triple Billions
help countries to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) … The
Triple Billion indices use a sub-set of 46 outcome indicators. These include 39
SDG indicators …
The
Triple Billion targets, A visual summary of methods to deliver impact,
World Health Organisation
So far, WHO states on its
dashboard to monitor the world, “the world is off track to achieve
the triple billion targets by 2025.” Consequently, WHO will not have made
enough progress to meet the related targets of the UN Sustainable Development
Goals by 2030.
Let’s keep it that way. #ExitTheWHO
THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
