John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© March 7, 2023
Since the Propaganda MSM and co-criminals in the lying U.S.
Government are HUGE on lying to Americans, you might be out of the loop that
not only did I-AM-THE-SCIENCE (NOT-TRUE)
Fauci lied about the Wuhan Lab Leak and Gain of Function (GoF) taxpayer
supported research that manufactured the China Virus (er…I mean COVID); Fauci
set out to fabricate science to coverup China Virus origins.
You need to dwell on the at one time RESPECTED scientists
and doctors who had their lives and professional standing ruined by the likes
of science criminals such as Anthony Fauci who defamed brave dissenters of the
lying science propaganda. Although I won’t touch on it now, YOU should dwell on
the motives behind criminal Fauci (and criminal associates) lies.
Guess hints: Pure Greed & Globalist Power.
Here are a couple of videos disdained on Youtube but
thankfully retained on Bitchute of once imminent (now oft vilified) Dr. Francis
Boyle on COVID ORIGINS way back in 2020. Ridiculed by propagandists but now the
documentation proving Fauci is a LIAR-FOR-GAIN, must be examined again:
Bitchute VIDEO: US BIOWARFARE ACT AUTHOR:
STUDIES CONFIRM CORONAVIRUS WEAPONIZED!
Posted by Spiro - Spiro Skouras
First Published February 23rd,
2020 03:54 UTC
In this interview, the Author of
the US Biowarfare Act, Professor Francis Boyle
uncovers four separate studies which he claims confirm as ‘smoking gun’
evidence the Wuhan Coronavirus known as COVID19 was in fact weaponized.
Professor Boyle also discloses
where he believes the true origin of the virus originated and the extent that
the US government was involved.
This is a must see interview as
Professor Boyle also reveals never before disclosed information.
AND
Bitchute VIDEO: SMOKING GUN: CHINA BOUGHT
WEAPONIZED WUHAN VIRUS FROM U.S.
Posted by BANNED.VIDEO
- Infowars
First Published February 20th,
2020 00:44 UTC
Dr. Francis Boyle joins The Alex
Jones Show to expose the smoking gun linking the weaponized Wuhan virus to the
U.S.
And here are Wuhan Lab Leak science articles (with a touch
of mRNA ridicule) that exposed Fauci Lies should garner significance again:
o DARPA
Covid Whistleblower’s Blockbuster Claim: Project Veritas says buried
documents show Fauci signed off on forbidden gain-of-function research; By Rod Dreher;
The American
Conservative; 1/11/22
o Did
US Biotechnology Help to Create COVID-19? By NEIL
L. HARRISON and JEFFREY D. SACHS; Project Syndicate;
5/27/22
o VERY
INFORMATIVE √√ THE
TIMING OF THE DOE LAB LEAK ANNOUNCEMENT: WHY NOW? By Tracy
Beanz & Michelle Edwards; The
HighWire; 3/1/23
o SARS- CoV-WIV: The
renaming of SARS-CoV-2; By Robert W
Malone MD, MS; Who is
Robert Malone (Substack); 3/3/23
AND NOW to some relevant cross posts on Fauci/Govt Lies. I
begin with actually amounts to some musing by Attorney Tom Renz and finish a
couple of more specific articles on Fauci lying on the Wuhan Lab Leak.
JRH 3/7/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated.
PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU
CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy collagen, vitamin
supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores:
My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058):
https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
********************
Fauci, & the DoD Made It Possible for EcoHealth
Alliance to Create SARS-COV-2 in the Wuhan Lab - Don't Let Them Start WWIII to
Cover It Up
[CHINA]
Photo by KOBU Agency on Unsplash
By Tom Renz
March 6, 2023
We’ve been talking a lot about biotech and the legitimate
potential we face of a world war. We know that COVID-19 was created in the
Wuhan lab and that it was made possible by our own DOD with American grants,
funding, and technology. The recent Senate bill, that passed unanimously, to
declassify Wuhan leak documents will show implicate China’s involvement in the
creation of SARS-COV-2 but not the role of our government. It is likely this is
being done to pressure China to stay out of Taiwan as well as to strongarm the
CCP not to back Russia in Ukraine (the globalist piggybank). While I appreciate
the intent of our elected officials on this bill the fact of the matter is that
it was written in a way that will only show part of the issue and, given the
millions dead from this disease and the fact that this could have implications
related to a potential world war, a full and transparent accounting of EVERYONE
involved MUST occur.
In related news, the good people in big pharma have now
decided to reformulate all vaccines to mRNA. This is very serious and nearly
inexplicable. Given the acknowledged efficacy in preventing transmission (the
jabs actually increase your likelihood of getting COVID over time) and the
numerous side effects (Died Suddenly, Damar Hamlin, heart issues, cancer,
strokes, autoimmune issues, neurological issues, etc.) why would we change
existing vaccines, that pharma has claimed have been doing their jobs for
decades, to include the same active ingredient causing the issues with no
benefits? Changing the formula will increase manufacturing costs for pharma
with substantial risk to the business so what could be behind this?
Why do they want all childhood vaccines to change to be gene
therapies for kids? Why are they putting mRNA into our food supply? Why are
they changing existing vaccines? Is there a smallpox outbreak we didn’t notice
because the old jabs are no longer working? Further, if this technology was so
incredibly safe and effective why are they hiding their plans from the public?
You don’t hide things unless you have something to hide. If Damar Hamlin didn’t
have a heart attack from the jab then why aren’t we hearing what the real cause
was? There’s a huge increase in deaths globally since the rollout of mRNA
vaccines yet they want to double down?
The reality is that this is really the WEF, Pfizer the WHO,
and the rest doubling down on their efforts to ensure every human being on this
planet is injected with the mRNA gene therapy, but why? Why is it so important
to these people to control our genes? Well, I cannot answer but to repeat what
has been said. Klaus Schwab (head of the WEF) says the fourth industrial
revolution isn’t about changing what you do, it’s about changing you. Changing
you with these gene altering vaccines. He says they change who you are and his
chief scientific advisor, the apparent Nazi fan-boy (yes Yuval Noah Harari
appears to me to be a fan of Hitler and Stalin in light of his repeated remarks
that seem to lament that those monsters did not have the tech we do) states
that humans are hackable and that free will is an illusion. These people are
literally promoting a future of slavery with them as the slave masters. This
sounds insane to me but should I ignore their words given the power and
influence they wield? Plus, what explanation is there for the above listed
insanity?
If we are going to suppose that the push for mRNA has
something to do with controlling genetic code the first question is whether
that is even close to possible and actually it is. Gatestone Institute has a
great article that was published in February of 2021 on how China has been
playing with genetics over the past decade with the goal of creating super
soldiers. The article, “China Is Creating a New Master Race,” lists China’s
goals to obtain “biological dominance,” with little to no ethical boundaries.
The experiments are described to evoke the eugenics program of the Third Reich
with the goal of creating a “master race.” Interestingly enough this article
also states that the genetic and biotech research was able to be conducted
thanks to their relationship with the United States and other western nations.
“American research labs, biotech investors, and scientists have all striven to
do research and business in China’s budding biotech arena… because of the
ethical standards for research… are so low,” according to Brandon Wichert. Much
of China’s work in this started around the time our DoD authorized the transfer
of tech and funds to China to create SARS-COV-2 through EcoHealth Alliance.
Just as importantly as anything related to making people all
like Captain America is the discussion in this and similar articles about
genetic programming of people to allow them to interface with tech and AI as well
as limiting or eliminating human emotion. Both of these are terrible. If my
genes could be altered in a way where Harari’s dream of hooking people up to
the internet and where they would be dependent on that connection to survive we
truly would all be slaves. Further, if any or all human emotions can be
“deprogrammed” would the resulting being still even be human? It is tough to be
sad or unhappy but without those emotions how can you appreciate being happy?
As I write this I find myself thinking it is absurd that any
of this would even warrant a keystroke but if Adolph Hitler had told me in the
1920s that he would take control of Germany, start a world war, and kill
millions of innocent Jews and others I would have probably found that statement
absurd as well. It is unthinkable that the elites are actually angling to
“alter and enslave humanity” but should I ignore the threat because it seems
ridiculous? This question is even more poignant when you consider the above
discussion which indicates that it seems possible and also like they are moving
in that direction.
At the end of the day, how much more clear can the
globalists and WEF be? Big pharma and the corrupt American government are
pushing forward on many of these things as we speak so should we pay attention
or write this off as absurd? Given the deaths already occurring, when are we
going to prosecute the guilty parties within our country? After they start a
world war? We already know these people don't care if they kill so I guess we shouldn’t
be shocked by any of this and the people committing these actions (especially
those within our own government) are committing crimes should be in GITMO. If I
have anything to say about it, Fauci and his buddies will pay for their
treasonous crimes… they knew what they were doing and we have the proof.
Sources and much more stuff:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-55905354
https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2019/08/chinas-military-pursuing-biotech/159167/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17048/china-gene-editing
https://slaynews.com/news/fuel-storage-facility-explodes-indonesia-15-dead/
https://thelibertydaily.com/another-train-has-derailed-in-ohio-hazmat-en-route/
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/03/05/analysis-kari-lake-takes-election-case-to-az-supreme-court/
© 2023 Tom Renz
++++++++++++++++++++
Emails Prove Fauci Lied about His Role in Lab Leak
Coverup
New Emails Prove Fauci Lied on Role Killing Lab Leak
Story
Posted by Tom Zawistowski
By Miranda Devine [ORIGINALLY NY
Post]
March 6, 2023
The question of why Fauci went to such an effort to
obscure the origins of COVID-19 is a major focus of the GOP-led committee.
New emails uncovered
by House Republicans probing the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the
deceptive nature of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
They show he “prompted” or commissioned — and had final
approval on — a scientific paper written specifically in February
2020 to disprove the theory that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan,
China.
Eight weeks later, Fauci
stood at a White House press conference alongside President
Trump and cited that paper as evidence that the lab leak theory was implausible
while pretending it had nothing to do with him and he did not know the authors.
“There was a study recently,” he told reporters on April 17,
2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab, “where a
group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences… in
bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it
is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a
human.
“So, the paper will be available. I don’t have the authors
right now, but we can make it available to you.”
That paper, entitled “The Proximal
Origin of SARS-CoV-2” was sent to Fauci for editing in draft form and again
for final approval before it was published in Nature Medicine on Feb. 17, 2020.
It was written four days after Fauci, and his NIH boss
Francis Collins, held a call with the four authors to discuss reports that
COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan lab and “may have been intentionally
genetically manipulated”.
The House Oversight subcommittee published emails Sunday in
which the paper’s co-author Dr. Kristian Andersen admits
Fauci “prompted” him to write the paper with the goal of “disprove” the lab
leak theory.
On February 12, 2020, Andersen submitted the paper to Nature
Medicine with a cover email: “There has been a lot of speculation,
fear-mongering, and conspiracies put forward in this space. [This paper was]
Prompted by Jeremy Farrah [sic], Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins”.
Farrar, then head of British nonprofit, the
Wellcome Trust, which has historic ties to the pharmaceutical
industry and the Gates Foundation, was rewarded with the plum role of Chief
Scientist at the World Health Organization last December.
On the day the “Proximal Origin” paper was published, emails show Farrar
pushing through a crucial change: “Sorry to micromanage/micro edit! But would
you be willing to change one sentence?”
Farrar’s change was to replace the word “unlikely” with
“improbable” in a statement about the lab leak origin, so it would read: “It
is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory
manipulation of an existing SARS-related coronavirus.”
Improbable means having a probability too low to inspire
belief; unbelievable, even ridiculous.
That’s what Fauci and friends wanted us to think of the lab
leak theory that looked probable from the “get-go”, as one dissenting scientist
said at the time, and looks more probable by the day.
The question of why Fauci went to such an effort to obscure
the origins of COVID-19 is a major focus of the GOP-led committee.
CLICK
HERE TO READ MORE NEWS AT THE NEW YORK POST
©2023, We the People Convention
+++++++++++++++++++++
Mainstream Puppets Now Admit Lab Leak Caused Pandemic
Analysis by Dr. Joseph
Mercola
March 6, 2023
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Ø For
nearly two years, there was a complete ban on discussing the COVID-19 lab leak
theory
Ø Facebook
reversed its censorship policy on the lab leak theory in June 2021. Now,
mainstream media are forced to admit the pandemic was most likely caused by a
lab leak
Ø January
28, 2023, epidemiologists Colin Butler and Delia Randolph published a joint
statement saying a lab leak is the most likely source of COVID-19. The two had
previously authored separate reports for the United Nations Environment Program
(UNEP), which commissioned them to investigate the possibility of the pandemic
being the result of “humanity’s abuse of nature”
Ø February
26, 2023, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Energy Department has
now revised its assessment of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, concluding the pandemic
“most likely arose from a laboratory leak”
Ø The FBI
also concluded a lab leak was the most likely scenario all the way back in
2021, yet played a central role in censoring anyone who suggested this is where
COVID came from
For nearly two years, there was a complete ban on discussing the COVID-19 lab
leak theory, and as noted by Robby Soave in a June 2021 Reason article,1 this
is a perfect example of why banning "misinformation" is a terrible
idea. Often enough, what's labeled as "misinformation" one day has
turned out to be true the next.
I first raised
the lab leak theory February 4, 2020, and it wasn't until June
2021 that Facebook finally reversed its censorship policy on this particular
topic, stating, "In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of
COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer
remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured from our apps."
"Facebook's concession that
the lab leak story it once viewed as demonstrably false is actually possibly
true should put to rest the idea that banning or regulating misinformation
should be a chief public policy goal," Soave wrote.2
Scientists Told to 'Shut Up'
In a February 15, 2023, article3 in the
British Express, Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George's,
University of London, recounts how he and his Norwegian colleagues, Birger
Sørensen (a virologist) and Andres Susrud (a molecular biologist), were
systematically silenced.4
The trio had assessed the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2,
concluding a bat origin was "extremely unlikely … as it had inserts around
the receptor binding region … that would make it more infectious." But no
matter how they tried, they couldn't get the paper published.
They even sent their findings to the British government and
Cabinet members, only to be told "quite categorically that there was no
way it could have been a laboratory escape."
"What was to follow was a
complete suppression of any debate about the origin, which would appear to have
been driven by Tony Fauci from the NIAID in America," Dalgleish
writes.5
"Indeed, he was so intent
on quashing any evidence of the origin that he commissioned a paper from a
group of scientists, who we now know also had concerns that it may not be
natural but nevertheless, they published the paper in Nature Medicine saying
all the evidence showed it was completely natural and was not a laboratory
leaked virus.
This paper was published in
Nature Medicine and then used by Tony Fauci as absolute proof that it was not a
lab leak. What was incredible was that this narrative was picked by governments
throughout the world, all the mainstream media and the majority of scientists,
who should have known better than to accept the narrative rather than look at
the evidence …
China's put-down was especially
strong and it was so very obvious that they were covering up something as all
specimens and databases were either altered or withdrawn. Very belatedly, China
allowed a team of international experts to investigate the cause of COVID and a
team were allowed into China to essentially come up with an official report
saying that it was clearly of natural origin.
Now, more than two years later,
two of the people involved with this, Professor Colin Butler from Australia and
Delia Randolph from the University of Greenwich, London, have spoken out that
it is clear now that all the evidence DOES support a lab leak and that there
has been a suppression of the truth.
There has been secrecy and
cover-up of this issue on a truly Orwellian scale … [In the] future, any new
threat, infectious disease or pandemic, must be addressed with open scientific
debate and not the complete suppression of the truth, secrecy and coverup
…"
Evidence Supports Lab Leak and Always Did
As noted by Dalgleish, Butler and Randolph have recently
spoken out about the fact that evidence for a lab leak was there from the
start. That's why Butler signed an open letter6 to the World
Health Organization in March 2021 calling for a "full and unrestricted
international forensic investigation into the origins of COVID-19."
The letter was sent after the WHO's team issued a clearly
biased report dismissing the lab leak theory as unworthy of further
investigation. January 28, 2023, Butler, along with Randolph, published a joint
statement in the Daily Mail, noting that:7
"[The] crucial debate over
Covid's origins has been shackled … And this refusal to discuss openly what
everyone suspects to be true — or at the very least strongly possible — has the
disastrous consequence of eroding public trust in science."
Butler and Randolph are now trying to set the record
straight. As explained in their article, the United Nations Environment Program
(UNEP) commissioned each of them in early 2020 to investigate and write reports
on the possibility of the pandemic being the result of "humanity's abuse of
nature."
Randolph's report, which came out first, ended up not
addressing the possibility of a non-natural origin, even though it was
"actively considered in the drafting." "[E]ven in early 2020, it
appeared that UNEP was averse to including anything so controversial as the
lab-leak theory in the report," the pair write.
Butler authored the second UNEP report. Early on, he'd been
skeptical about a lab link, but "as circumstantial evidence in support of
a laboratory pathway grew, thanks to the work of a few brave scientists,
internet detectives and journalists," Butler finally concluded that the
lab leak theory had to be considered. Butler's report therefore did include an
extensive discussion about the possibility of a lab leak.
'Laboratory Pathway Seems the Most Likely'
Butler's initial drafts were strongly criticized by internal
UNEP reviewers, and as the report neared finalization, Butler started
suspecting that publication was being "deliberately stalled."
According to Butler and Randolph:8
"The first report was
published within weeks of completion, but the second one took ten months — and
only appeared after an increasingly alarmed author contacted influential
figures … It was eventually released with little publicity three months ago.
These two reports are
substantial with a combined length of 152 pages, citing 387 scientific
publications and with 94 reviewers. They cannot be dismissed as scientifically
lightweight, nor the product of biased or naive authors.
Unlike some key players in the COVID
origin debate, neither of us has been involved in 'gain of function' work that
includes manipulation of virological structures to increase virulence. Nor do
we have any history of collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology
(WIV).
Neither of us has received funds
from the US National Institutes of Health, the US Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency or EcoHealth Alliance — all of which have been involved with
funding work at WIV that falls within the definition of 'gain of function.'
Nor have either of us been
financially rewarded for work with the Wellcome Trust … whose director Sir
Jeremy Farrar was, we believe, a key figure alongside US funding chiefs in the
scandalous suppression of debate on this issue …
Most recently discovered
pathogens 'burn out' in human populations. Some are then held in laboratories,
including in Wuhan … Are some of these being experimented upon? Almost
certainly, yes. Yet a pall of suspicious secrecy, deceit and conflicts of
interest shroud this work …
We can see incompetence, too. A
new report by the US Office of Inspector General found fault with both the
National Institutes of Health, the world's biggest public funder of biomedical
research, and EcoHealth Alliance, which it was supposed to help monitor.
This report damningly noted that
each organization failed to 'understand the nature of the research conducted,
identify potential problem areas and take corrective action.' It is of critical
importance that these risks are better understood, that scientists accept the
dangers and that this field is better regulated.
Our view is that, on current
balance of evidence, a laboratory pathway seems the most likely cause of the
pandemic … Irrespective of the origin of the pandemic, however, this debate has
exposed that self-regulation of 'gain of function' research has been a dismal
failure."
Department of Energy Report Supports Lab Leak Theory
February 26, 2023, one month after Butler and Randolph's
joint statement, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Energy
Department has now revised its assessment of the origin of SARS-CoV-2,
concluding the pandemic "most likely arose from a laboratory leak:"9
"The shift by the Energy
Department, which previously was undecided on how the virus emerged, is noted
in an update to a 2021 document by Director of National Intelligence Avril
Haines's office …
The Energy Department now joins
the Federal Bureau of Investigation in saying the virus likely spread via a
mishap at a Chinese laboratory …
The Energy Department's
conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the
agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S.
national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research.
The Energy Department made its
judgment with 'low confidence,' according to people who have read the
classified report. The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic
was likely the result of a lab leak in 2021 with 'moderate confidence' and
still holds to this view."
US Intelligence Suspected Lab Leak All Along
So, in 2021, the FBI thought the lab leak theory was not
only plausible but likely, yet the agency was instrumental
in censoring public discussion about it. What's more, the
Energy Department reportedly prepared a study all the way back in May 2020,
which concluded "that a lab-leak hypothesis was plausible and deserved
further investigation."
In other words, Big Tech was told to censor a truth that at
least two different agencies within the intelligence community supported. In a
February 27, 2023, Twitter thread,10 investigative journalist
Paul D. Thacker also points out that not just one but two separate teams of
scientists at different Energy Department labs have concluded that a lab
accident was the most likely source of the pandemic. So, we really have three
intel community assessments pointing in the same direction.
“The FBI concluded a lab leak
was the most likely scenario all the way back in 2021, yet played a central
role in censoring anyone who suggested this is where COVID came from.”
Curiously, the FBI still appears hell-bent on continuing the
cover-up, even as the fabricated narrative is crumbling. As noted by Dr. Robert
Malone,11 House and Senate Republicans who are investigating
the origin of the pandemic have pressed the FBI for more information, in
particular what kind of information made them suspect a lab leak.
But the agency is refusing to share those details, citing
Justice Department policy on "preserving the integrity of ongoing
investigations." In other words, by claiming there's an active
investigation underway, the FBI doesn't have to share any of the information
Congress is requesting, which seems rather convenient.
The question is, just how long does the FBI need to conclude
this supposed investigation? As noted by Malone,12 "The
FBI must divulge what it knows in a timely manner. We don't have time to wait
for their endless investigations to be concluded. Three years is already too
long to wait. Congress and the American public deserve answers now."
Mainstream Puppets Trying to Get Ahead of the Bigger
Story?
A string of mainstream media puppets are now reporting that
a lab leak may be the most likely explanation for the pandemic.13 We've
yet so see apologies for their former unprofessionalism, however. One reason
for this U-turn might be that they're now trying to get ahead of an even bigger
story, namely the absolute confirmation that SARS-CoV-2 is an engineered virus
that got unleashed on mankind.
Mainstream media need to make it look like they weren't
accessories to covering up democide (the intentional killing of unarmed
civilians by government), because the lab leak theory leads directly to the
intentional manipulation of viruses and government bioweapons development.
The globalist string-pullers are also starting to test out
potential escape routes, from getting the public onboard with
"amnesty" for COVID mistakes to pretending they've been the ones
pushing for answers. As noted by Twitter user Clandestine:14
"We have passed into a new
phase of the COVID saga. The U.S. government is starting to slowly admit
SARS-CoV-2 was a human-engineered pathogen that leaked from a lab in China.
This is essentially the end of the road for the COVID narrative.
This is the death knell for the
Globalists. Why? Because the broader public are now emboldened to ask more
questions: Who made it? Who 'leaked' it? Why did the MSM/Tech lie? Why did the
U.S. government censor anyone who suggested this over the last 3 years?
The Biden admin are already
trying to get in front of it. NSA Jake Sullivan on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
today: 'President Biden has directed, repeatedly, every element of our
intelligence community to put effort and resources behind getting to the bottom
of this question.'
Anyone with a pulse can tell you
Jake Sullivan is lying through his teeth. Not only has the Biden admin NOT been
pursuing the answers to SARS-CoV-2's origins, the intelligence community
conspired with Big Tech to censor the people who have been saying this for
three … years.
Russia and China have been
formally alleging that the virus was man-made by Western Oligarchs for over a
year now. They have been calling for UN Security Council investigation into the
US biological network in Ukraine. The West cried 'disinformation' …
The Biden admin are going to
begin gaslighting their sheep that they have been looking for the origins of
SARS-CoV-2 this entire time. When in reality, they brainwashed the planet and
violated the Constitution to silence anyone who was actually looking for the
origin."
COVID Antibodies Found in Stored Blood From September
2019
On the other side of this story, researchers have discovered
COVID antibodies in blood collected and stored in European blood banks since
September 2019, in the case of Italy,15 and November 2019 in
the case of France.16
As noted by Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya,17 the
implications of these findings are "enormous," because this means the
lockdowns were implemented several months after the virus had already started
spreading across the globe. Lockdowns have only a tiny effect, if any, in the
first place, and locking everyone down after a virus has been spreading for
months is less than useless.
Yet no one in government or mainstream media covered these
findings, which were published in November 2020 and February 2021 respectively.
If they had, it would have been clear by the end of 2020 that lockdowns were
futile from the start and had to end.
Virus Engineering Is One of the Greatest Threats to
Humanity
If the COVID pandemic has taught us anything, it's that
genetic engineering of viruses with pandemic potential is one of the greatest
threats to humanity and must stop.
A research proposal to DARPA dating back to 2018 described
plans to create a virus that sounds eerily similar, if not identical, to
SARS-CoV-2,18 and while the proposal was declined, there's no
reason why it couldn't have been done through some other program.
COVID-19 has allegedly killed nearly 6.8 million people
around the world and the entire global economy has been decimated. If the kind
of genetic tinkering that produced SARS-CoV-2 is allowed to continue, it's only
a matter of time before some manmade virus starts wiping out targeted
populations, as they will eventually find a way to target specific genetic
traits.19
The only policy that makes sense going forward is a complete
ban on gain of function research, and severe punishment for violations. The
industry clearly cannot regulate itself, and regulations on this kind of
research always ends up creating loopholes.
Sources and References
1, 2 Reason June 4, 2021
3, 5 Express February 15, 2023
6 The New York Times March 4, 2021 (Archived)
7, 8 Daily Mail January 28, 2023
9 Wall Street Journal February 26, 2023 (Archived)
10, 13 Twitter Paul Thacker February 28, 2023
11, 12 RW Malone Substack February 26, 2023
14 Twitter Clandestine February 26, 2023
15 SAGE Journals November 11, 2020; 107(5)
16 European Journal of Epidemiology February 6, 2021; 36: 219-222
17 Twitter Jay Bhattacharya March 13, 2022
18 Twitter Alina Chan February 17, 2023
19 New York Times February 20, 2023
© 1997-2023 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights
Reserved.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Blog Editor: And here is some bonus video if you make it
this far:
Bitchute VIDEO: DR. LI-MENG YAN &
BRIAN O'SHEA - COVID LAB LEAK EVIDENCE
Posted by Right2Freedom
First Published March 6th, 2023 06:03 UTC
Mar 02, 2023
Source: www.rumble.com/v2bhqps-covid-lab-leak-evidence-escaped-chinese-virologist-dr.-li-meng-yan-and-bria.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
Internal emails between Dr. Fauci and world health experts
expose the frantic rush to respond to the growing threat of a global pandemic
in early 2020 – and they reveal new evidence to support the theory that
COVID-19 originated from a lab leak in Wuhan, China.
Why did the media and Big Tech work so hard to suppress the
lab leak theory if the experts were actively debating it behind-the-scenes?
Brian O'Shea (an intelligence operations specialist & private investigator)
joins Dr. Li-meng Yan (a virologist who escaped from China) to dig in to the
latest evidence, unredacted emails between Dr. Fauci in the pandemic's earliest
days, and to explore the terrifying possibility that the virus was leaked
intentionally.
Brian O'Shea is an Intelligence Operations Specialist,
Intelligence Analyst, Private Investigator, and Chief Operating Officer at
Centurion Intelligence Partners. After serving in the military for 11 years of
active-duty service, Brian worked as a Senior Consultant and Subject Matter
Expert for two of the US Government’s top intelligence agencies. Find him
online at https://centurionintelligence.com/ and https://twitter.com/BrianOSheaSPI.
(Viewers may also be familiar with Brian via his wife Naomi Wolf, who
referenced his vast knowledge of global intelligence activity in earlier
episodes)
Dr. Li-meng Yan (AKA Dr. Yan Limeng, 闫丽梦
or 閆麗夢)
is a Chinese virologist known for her publications and interviews alleging that
SARS-CoV-2 was made in a Chinese government laboratory. She came to the United
States in 2020, where she has co-authored several preprint research papers that
are intended to back up her claim. Follow Dr. Yan at https://twitter.com/DrLiMengYAN1 and
listen to her show “The Voice of Dr. Yan” on America Out Loud Radio Network
at https://www.americaoutloud.com/voice-of-dr-yan/
.jpg)
.jpg)
