DONATE

Friday, December 6, 2019

Reason and/or Path to Support Blog


John R. Houk
© December 6, 2019

**** BLOG UPDATE!!!! ****
December 7, 2019

About half way down this post I used the phrase “Here comes trouble” in alluding to actually using the name of my wife’s Healthy Coffee business name in promoting the business.

BOY was I correct. I am officially in the proverbial dog house! Evidently by the time Diana my lovely wife awoke and began her day of selling and promoting her Healthy Coffee business sticklers for following policies and procedures evidently were doing some finger pointing toward her.

SO, as you scroll down all the information I regard helpful contrasting the difference between the blessings of a product-driven Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) and a NO-Product (and in most cases illegal) Pyramid/Ponzi Scheme will remain. Because I gotta tell ya that is some darn good info to know.

SADLY, all information referencing my wife’s DARN GOOD product driven MLM company will disappear to gratify the sticklers for “policies and procedures”. I would deliver some fine words for those sticklers because it is in my nature to be cranky over such frivolous issues ESPECIALLY since I was being quite complimentary, but my dog house might get a big heavy chain attached to it and baby it’s cold outside.

But I am sticking to the point of appreciating dedicated support for this blog. BUT hoping to get out of the dog house I NEED to disassociate any blog support I receive away from the great products of my wife’s Healthy Coffee business. The two are NOT synonymous even though marriage to a successful network marketing spouse does contain benefits personally BUT NOT AT ALL ASSOCIATED TO THIS POLITICALLY ORIENTED blog.

I did not think through my Conservatism my be a blot on Left-thinking politically oriented entrepreneurs that might be in the same Healthy Coffee business. MY FAULT! I should have realized Left-thinkers actually use free enterprise marketing as much as Conservatives. I could go on but I sense my dog house chain might be getting larger.

So for the future I will stick to soliciting support for this blog and if you want to look into Healthy Coffee for personal use or building your own income earning Networking business, I’ll stick to using wife’s one of many purchased domain names that re-direct to her Healthy Coffee business (cough that would be SkinnyOptimumCoffee.com). For the policies & procedures sticklers, even the embedded links below containing the actual fantastic Healthy Coffee name have been removed and replaced with Diana’s re-direct purchased domain name.

**** END OF UPDATE ****

If you visit my blogs I always place my initials followed by the date of posting at the end of my thoughts or introduction to another’s thoughts.

Under my initials are links soliciting support for reading my blog post. Of late I have noticed an increase in readership but a decrease in financial support. I am a Baby-Boomer on a disability fixed income and had enjoyed the monetary remuneration my mostly Conservative, sometime Counterjihad and less often Christian posts would bring in.

Knowing Americans are typically people who like told tangibility in their hands when they lay out their earned cash, I thought to increase family revenue by adding links to my loving wife’s healthy coffee business for people to be supportive and have a product in hand.

So, I am going to step away a bit from Conservative politics and write about the healthy coffee business. I really should have my wife share as a contributor because she’s the business person in the family, but I sense I need to share some personal thoughts.

Healthy Coffee Business

The Coffee business is a home-based business which in case you are unaware means typically a multi-level marketing company is involved.

People either love or hate multi-level marketing.  The love part typically arises from successfully adding (at least) some part time income to your full time job. The hate part typically arises when you buy into the potential but discover you don’t do a bit of work no extra income comes into your product.

Like any income situation, you work you get paid. You don’t work, you don’t get paid. In a normal job no work means you get fired. In most multi-level marketing (MLM) companies no work simply means no pay-out. Some MLM companies require an annual re-up fee to stay active while some don’t. The no-work MLM haters are really irritated with re-upping if no cash is coming in AGAIN from no working.

Are MLMs a Pyramid Scheme or Ponzi Scheme?

The difference between a legitimate MLM company and a Pyramid Scheme is the existence of a product.

Pyramid Schemes have ZERO product. Income or earnings are solely based in signing up and creating a network of people buying into whatever the Pyramid is called or labelled. The people at the top of the Pyramid make the most money with the people making little to nothing. All Pyramids collapse when people stop signing up WHICH is the Pyramid Schemes are illegal in most States. When Pyramids collapse the suckers at the bottom lose their investment or investments while many Pyramid people at the top go to jail or run and hide with ill-gotten gain. The most infamous Pyramid/Ponzi Scheme was perpetrated by Bernie Madoff which you can read about HERE.

MLM Product Driven Yet Pyramid-Like

If there is no product the Pyramid ALWAYS collapses. The people with the best business acumen build a network of sellers and coach your sellers to also build a network of sellers. The network stack is the appearance of a Pyramid, BUT unlike the NO-Product scheme the Network Stack is product driven. The stack can fail if sellers stop selling. That is where business acumen comes in: MLM business builders constantly have to keep signing up good salesmen (or saleswomen) because people lose interest or move onto to another interest.

The beauty of an MLM is you make as much money as the work you put into it. Some people just want to sell enough the product to achieve a particular goal such as make some Christmas present buying cash, make some car payments or some other small but needed goal.

Others have loftier goals and may want to buy a house or set up a retirement income. Sales people with lofty goals are typically network builders.

The bottom line though the MLM is a product driven company ALSO trying to turn a profit. If you have specific short term goal, frankly it may not matter much about an MLM company’s product sustainability. What matters is if you believe you can sell that product to attain your short term goal. If you have loftier goals you are going to want research an MLM company for its longevity indicating the success rate of its product and just how lucrative the financial compensation is. (NOTE: You are looking for COMPENSATION for work rather than a RETURN on an investment. Companies offering investment returns might be a red-flag for Pyramid Scheme.)

MY Wife’s Healthy Coffee

I got to tell ya this is where I may be getting my wife in trouble. TYPICALLY MLM companies only like or allow approved content when the company name is used in connection to their product. I am not an actual sales rep with my wife’s company BUT thanks to holy matrimony, I definitely benefit from the compensation she receives. On a personal level, I simply am not a good salesman. So, I stick to blogging.

My wife has purchased a host of domain names that does not incorporate the actual MLM company name to stay out of trouble. Those domains if clicked upon ALL are redirected to her personal company website where you can buy product or find out how to join the company at various levels. The higher the level in the company the greater the COMPENSATION.

If you just want to try some product – HEALTHY COFFEE is central but not the only product – to see what the buzz is about, the sale obviously benefits my wife. On my SlantRight 2.0 blog was able to add a banner on a side panel with one her domain names. That domain name in that panel is SkinnyOptimumCoffee.com.


Diana – my wife – signed up under the “Business Builder” option which the Healthy Coffee business calls the Ruby position working for higher positions. Contact Diana on business opportunities and any answers she doesn’t know yet, Diana knows people doing the Healthy Coffee business who does know: dianahouk@cox.net.


Diana’s 2018 Before & After Photo on her Business Cards


In my case before using the Healthy Coffee business products I weighed 383 pounds. After my last Doctor’s visit a couple of months ago I now weigh 298 pounds. I’m still a big dude looking to lose weight. I gotta tell ya though, I haven’t been in the 200 pound stratosphere in nearly a decade. Diana’s weight loss has been more dramatic, but as you can surmise she is more conscientious about what she eats. Me … not so much. I just don’t consume as much thanks to the products and largely the coffee. Since I began to pay attention, without trying I’ve been losing 3 to 5 pounds every three months that has translated into losing 85 pounds.


Sooooo …. Buy some coffee or other health products, or become a business builder by signing up scroll down for level of entrance (ask Diana how to upgrade level) for your own network or tell me you like reading my Blog by clicking my PayPal link.


JRH 12/6/19 - UPDATED 12/7/19
Your generosity is always appreciated: 
Please Support SlantRight 2.0


Wednesday, December 4, 2019

The Coup Against Trump – IMPEACH All Dems


John R. Houk
© December 4, 2019

President Donald Trump has faced Leftist and Dem venom from the very point he decided to run as a Republican for President of the United States. I don’t know about you but just as a Conservative voter I was a bit mystified by this venom.

Trump’s entertainment days were not exactly a paradigm of Conservative values. I mean entertainment-wise, I enjoyed watching Donald Trump telling an Apprentice contestant not meeting Trump business standards that he/she had a – “YOU’RE FIRED!” It was fun to watch, but not exactly an endorsement for Family Values.

YET the Donald announces a GOP run and all of a sudden Leftist politicians, former Leftist pals in Entertainment and the ever wicked Republicans in Name Only (RINOs) all of a sudden hated Trump’s guts. These haters vilified and ridiculed Donald Trump and at the time … I didn’t care. I was voting for the most reputable Family Values Republican in Senator Ted Cruz.

BUT WHAT HAPPENED?

GOP candidate after candidate went down in flames to the witticism of Donald Trump. Finally, my guy Ted Cruz was eliminated by the numbers and Trump won the Republican nomination for President in 2016.

Leftist Politicians, Left-Wing Entertainers (former Trump buddies mind you) and of course RINOs proclaimed from the roof tops that the Republican Party just handed POTUS to Hillary Clinton –

Ø the gal with an illegal government server as Secretary of State

Ø the gal that ordered the deletion of the tens of thousands of those illegal server emails

Ø the gal who ordered ALL electronic devices destroyed that may have had some of those illegal server emails and some by hammering to bits

Ø the gal who had her ex-President husband have a secret airport tarmac meeting with Obama’s Attorney General while she was supposedly under investigation for her illegal email server (still in use until exposed)

Ø the gal who as Dem Nominee for President had her Democratic National Committee (DNC) hacked (by someone) exposing nefarious Dem practices via Wikileaks

Ø the gal while Dem Nominee told everyone the Russians and Trump meddle in the 2016 election YET would not all an FBI/CIA forensic examination of DNC to confirm Dem client Crowdstrike assertions “the Russians did it.”




Ø The gal while Dem Nominee had the DNC foot the money trail for the debunked Steele Dossier lying about a Trump involvement with Russians to win the 2016 election.

Ø THE SAME GAL who as the Dem Nominee for President worked with Ukrainians to win the 2016 election she LOST to Donald Trump.



The above points are only those I recall off the top of mind, I am certain others could add more egregious actions under Crooked Hillary and her Dem Party.

AND YET the Dems in the House as the Majority Party are conducting Impeachment proceedings in which a majority of States via the Electoral College confirmed Donald Trump as President of the United States.

ONLY a Dem concerned about Trump’s reversing Obama’s fundamental transformation of America away from our nation’s Christian roots and away from our Founding Fathers’ Original Intent for America embodied in the Declaration of Independence and Ratified U.S. Constitution would support the Impeachment witch hunt being conducted in the House of Representatives.

And now I come to the inspiration for these thoughts. Yesterday Israpundit cross posted an American Thinker post referring to Judge Jeanine entitled, “Obama started the Trump hate”. The title sounds more like every Dem involved in this coup against President Trump in Congress and the Executive Branch (and perhaps every Obama Judiciary appointee) should be impeached.

JRH 12/4/19
Your generosity is always appreciated: 
Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 


Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
*************************
Judge Jeanine: ‘Obama started the Trump hate’

December 3, 2019

Almost four years into the war on Donald Trump, any mention of Obama's role in the banana republic tactics has been covered up.  The fact that high-ranking Obama-appointed FBI/CIA/intelligence officials have been caught plotting to delegitimize an election and remove President Trump from office makes it a sure bet that Obama, the consummate community organizer, had a tight leash on everything going on in the White House.  During her show this past Saturday, Judge Jeanine Pirro and her guest, The Plot against the President author Lee Smith, specifically called out Barack Obama for "interfering in the peaceful transition of power" in 2016.  It's about time.

The five-minute interview, which aired on Fox's Justice with Judge Jeanine, boiled this impeachment nightmare down to its essence: Barack Hussein Obama is the first president to orchestrate a coup against an incoming administration.  Smith even went on to suggest that Obama has set up a command post less than two miles from the White House.  As the "de facto head of the Democratic Party still ... Barack Obama is right in the middle of the anti- Trump operation," according to Smith.

Judge Jeannine then recalled Obama's actions weeks before the 2016  election: 

Watching Barack Obama taking the week off and doing nothing but campaigning for Hillary Clinton ... to me I just remembered thinking to myself that's a little weird, um, I know Presidents support incoming but that was full-on, all-in Barack Obama worried about Trump, making fun of Trump, it had never happened that way in the history of this country.  He started the Trump hate.


In October 2016, a Sun-Sentinel article reported that the Clinton campaign had "deployed the President to key battleground states."  At each stop, Obama mocked, derided, and attacked candidate Trump.  When it looked as though a tough New York real estate mogul might actually beat Hillary Clinton, and worse, if elected, have the cojones to expose the Obama regime as the third-world Marxist corruptocrats they are, President Obama put everything on hold and went all in, as Judge Jeanine observed. 

Obama's strategy of inciting hatred of candidate Trump was nothing new.  For eight years, Obama had inspired his followers to hate America; rich white people; the police; corporations; private enterprise; and, most of all, those 'God, family, country' conservatives who would rise up in 2016 to reject yet another hater.

Barack and Michelle Obama's record of malice toward this country, from Michelle's racist Princeton thesis to her speech in South Carolina calling the U.S. "a downright mean country" to candidate Obama's  disdain for working-class "gun and religion clingers," laid the foundation of hate from which Trump Derangement Syndrome would emerge.

The unprecedented attempted overthrow of a duly elected president continues this week in more impeachment hearings as the Democrats throw everything at POTUS, hoping something sticks.  Against all logic, the Democrats and their voter base really, really hate Trump's guts.  Jeanine Pirro rightly puts the blame for this hate-filled mockery of our Constitution on the Deep State's figurehead: Barack Hussein Obama.
++++++++++++++++++
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
______________________________
The Coup Against Trump – IMPEACH All Dems
John R. Houk
© December 4, 2019
_______________________
Judge Jeanine: ‘Obama started the Trump hate’

Copyright © 2017- Israpundit - All Rights Reserved


Tuesday, December 3, 2019

The Mo OCD Understanding of Islam

An Intro by John R. Houk
© December 3, 2019



OCD – Also known as Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. I am a member of Michael Lederman’s MeWe Group called Islam: The Truth. I came across one of his posts yesterday where he examines some of the eccentricities of Islam’s founder known to the West as Muhammad (aka Mohammed or Mahomet and so on). According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica Mo’s name was: Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib ibn Hāshim, (born c. 570, Mecca, Arabia [now in Saudi Arabia]—died June 8, 632, Medina).

Lederman’s OCD examination is sure to rile Multiculturalists brainwashed to accept cultures not traditionally Western and Muslims brainwashed to believe Muhammad is the perfect example of a human man.

REGARDLESS, the Lederman OCD examination goes a long way to explain the virulent activities AGAINST non-Muslims. When a person with obvious OCD hang-ups is placed on a pedestal of perfection which a billion or more followers are told to emulate, that emulation definitively will NOT bode well for the non-Muslim and in my humble opinion, causes an inner socio-cultural harm among the devotees of Islam as well.

Because of the nature of this truth upsetting Muslims in particular (I could care less about upsetting a Left-Wing Multiculturalist – they self-destructive) I am not sharing on much Social Media. If you don’t mind the venom of Social Media Jail (e.g. Facebook & Twitter suspensions or bannings temporarily or longer), then share away and more to the truth of cultural survival.


JRH 12/3/19
Your generosity is always appreciated: 
Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 
***************************
Muhammad's Dietary Compulsions And Jewelry Obsessions



12/2/19
MeWe Group – Islam: The Truth

#thepeoplevsmuhammad


Sticky brain

We’ve covered a lot of ground in this particular section of Muhammad’s psychoanalysis and I believe it to be pertinent to conclude the investigation of this disorder with the aforementioned symptom, “Sticky brain.” What exactly does this peculiar mental anomaly entail? If a patient is to perform an action, or should an image pop into their thought process, often it becomes nigh impossible to forget and repeat.

Consequently, the individual will experience haunting memory echoes, compelling them to repeatedly check the procedure, verbalize the action, or perform a compulsive ritual attempting to replace or erase the thought from their consciousness. If one is to research OCD extensively, they will find that this compulsion is highly prevalent in those with the condition, and is the precursor before an individual descends into compulsive mental torture.

After researching the Hadith, chapter, and verse, it’s abundantly evident that Muhammad’s Islam gravitates entirely around his mental disorder. The symptom “sticky brain”, is echoed numerous times, and on one particular occasion, Muhammad verbally reprimands Aisha for exacerbating his condition:

Narrated Anas: Aisha had a thick curtain (having pictures on it) and she screened the side of her house with it. The Prophet said to her, "Remove it from my sight, for its pictures are still coming to my mind in my prayers."
Sahih Bukhari 7:72:842

As you can see here, the evidence for the sticky brain is quite obvious. Muhammad must have suffered strong mental echoes for the remainder of his life, and consequently destroyed every piece of art. Perhaps this is also why the hijab was created, as the physical aspects of a woman’s face might also have perturbed him. And while Islam will purport that the prohibition for pictures derives from ‘idolatry’, their assertion is simply erroneous upon acknowledging this tradition and the following.

Thus, if any reader still has doubts about whether Muhammad did actually suffer from the illness, I shall re-introduce a Hadith tradition which will substantiate my claim:

Narrated by Anas
“Whenever Allah's Apostle greeted somebody, he used to greet him three times, and if he spoke a sentence, he used to repeat it thrice.”
Sahih Bukhari 8:74:261

As we can see here, Muhammad was compelled to offer salutations and repeat himself over three times to adhere to his condition. For any rationally minded person, there is no need to conduct oneself as such, unless his followers were suffering from an epidemic of hearing difficulties.

However, I am fully aware that even the worst firebrand of Muslim apologists will refute my claim. And so, I will once again introduce another Hadith to reconfirm my suspicions. Again, the protracted account in the following tradition not only confirms Muhammad’s incapacity to refrain from his compulsive nature but proves that even his followers began to psychologically develop repetitive sticky brain because of him:

Narrated Abu Dharr:
I came to the Prophet while he was wearing white clothes and sleeping. Then I went back to him again after he had got up from his sleep.

He said, "Nobody says: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah' and then later on he dies while believing in that, except that he will enter Paradise."

I said, "Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?"

He said. 'Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft."

I said, "Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?"

He said. 'Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft."

I said, 'Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?'

He said, "Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft..."
Sahih Bukhari 7:72:717

No less than 3 times did Muhammad and his lackey refrain from repeating themselves. Ladies and gentlemen, this is obsessive-compulsive order defined! Hypothetically, to watch both OCD patients converse while living out their conversational compulsions would be a sight to behold. How exactly would they be able to break the habit is unfathomable.

However, if you are still not convinced, and believes that the ‘prophet’ most probably was only highly eccentric and exceptionally particular in his conduct, I suggest them to watch The Aviator (2004) based on the life of the OCD stricken, Howard Hughes. The very last scene of the film exposes the extent of “sticky brain” as Hughes suffers a complete mental breakdown, compulsively repeating a particular phrase to himself.

Throughout the traditions, there is a pattern of compulsion of which he conformed to. It’s abundantly clear the ‘prophet’ was afflicted with the condition considering that he never gave any plausible explanation for his odd ways. However, it’s obvious that his schizophrenia invariably played a crucial role in his OCD, as his hallucinations effectively trickled down into daily ritual and routine. Evidently, the majority of his perturbing actions were the brainchild of his psychotic delusions. The irony is that Muslims believed his irrational behavioral compulsions were ‘divine’, sent by Allah. When in truth, his example was nothing more than a mental illness which remained undiagnosed for over 1400 years.

OCD is so common, that up to 3% of adults and children suffer from the condition. Ironically, just like every other mental illness, Muhammad possessed, early Muslims were also compelled to imitate another psychological disorder of his. Evidently, the extent of his illness saw his ordinances unabatedly grow out of control to form a tightly constrictive society based on psychologically compulsive affiliations including washing, checking, counting, launching paranoid accusations and developing spiritual anxieties. Yet, it’s amazing how Islam still continues to flourish considering the detrimental nature of it’s so-called ‘godly’ commandments pertaining to hygiene.

The life-threatening bacteria contained in the Zam Zam Well and the Well of Buda’ah should’ve killed off the early Muslims before Sharia could ever take hold in the region. Likewise, the mass consumption of camel urine should’ve also finished the cult as it's only recently been reported that the bacteria replete excretion has been linked to MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome).

If we acknowledge Muhammad’s excessive wastage of precious water, which he squandered for his personal obsessions over ‘cleanliness’, it’s abundantly clear that early Islamic cult members would’ve been appalled by his irresponsibility with the vital resource. It’s highly likely he was aware of growing resentment, as Arabs would’ve culturally considered water as the highest priority; their life’s blood. Thus fearing a full-scale revolt, the grandmaster of the universe qualified urine as a substitute for the consumption of water.

Sadly, because Muhammad’s irrational behavior continued unabated until his death, his followers were never able to recognize his illness and accepted that his OCD was entirely normal. This was the consequence of years of psychological grooming, and having the ‘prophet’ repeatedly drum into their psyche’s that his example mirrored god. They only had themselves to compare to the ‘prophet’ of whom he regarded himself as the ‘perfect human’. The irony is that his disciples’ rational thinking became irrational, and vice versa.

It’s evident from the repetitive patterns of his compulsions, Muhammad desperately tried to control his illness, yet this only made matters worse. Psychologists who prescribe ‘cognitive behavior therapy’ teach patients not to give in to their repetitive thinking, and advocate breaking the habit. Had the ‘prophet’ been aware of this technique, it may have helped him overcome his affliction. Although, it’s highly probable that his illness derived from genetic influence.

It’s assumed that hereditary genetics plays a strong role in the individual obtaining the condition. If we study Muhammad’s life and genetic line, it’s possible that not only he, but many of his predecessors within the Quraish tribe suffered from OCD. Indicative of the religious compulsive characteristic, during the pre-Islamic era, the clan would compulsively circumambulate the Ka’aba seven times (an odd number) and obsessively prostrate themselves before the edifice. Likewise, the fact that they were exceptionally superstitious folk who unapologetically believed in jinn, solar eclipses that signified omens, lunar-based holidays like Ramadan, and phobias of females, of which lead to infanticide, could all be attributed to a hereditary genetical disposition for the condition. Or perhaps their fundamental religious tenets were created by one of whom was an afflicted individual.

This is not a preposterous argument as even today, there are many non-Muslims who will take a pinch of salt, and throw it behind their left shoulder. While anyone will tell you that this particular ritual was born from superstition (attributed to Leonardo Da Vinci’s ‘Last Supper’, throwing salt at the devil’s face), it’s more likely the byproduct of an obsessive compulsive’s anxiety.

Nevertheless, the foundations of Islamic doctrine was built with Muhammad’s anxiety. Anxiety is a central component of fear. Fear is the core of OCD - the inherent worrying over things that are out of the individual’s control. And fear is what binds Islam together. And wherever there is fear, there is guilt. Guilt itself is also a key component in Islam’s inherited compulsive disorder. [Bold Text by Blog Editor]

As we are soon to discover, it’s possible that Muhammad felt unremitting guilt regarding his rampant sex-addition and especially his sexual encounter with his dead aunt. These haunting incestuous memories would’ve compelled him to obsess over cleanliness and genital ablutions. Eventually, his washings became ritualistic upon developing OCD, which was a result of his obsession to forget his indelible sordid past.

In truth, Muhammad was running scared. Being an individual born into poverty, and evolving into an overly dependent character, his newfound military authority would’ve acted as a double-edged sword. And the more powerful he became, the more fearful he was of losing the throne. As a simple incompetent peasant thrust into the pinnacle of political Arabia, undoubtedly the thrill would’ve worn off as the crushing reality of his ‘prophethood’ demanded that only he could decide the future of the Ummah. This confronting fact would’ve undoubtedly rattled his psyche, undoubtedly bolstering a life-long anxiety disorder. It’s obvious after reading the Hadith, that many times he was caught unawares and had to fabricate nonsensical superstitions and compulsions to counteract any threat to his crown.

Mirroring Muhammad’s own life, the aforementioned legendary oil tycoon Howard Hughes also faced a similar predicament. Inheriting enormous wealth and fear of losing his position of power, fame, and fortune, Hughes eventually fell into the same psychological trap. Though exempt from schizophrenia, the tycoon resorted to the same Muhammadan irrational hygienic rituals, compulsions, and repetitive verbal delivery. Sadly, not only her but everyone around him was affected.

Like the Islamic Ummah, Hughes's exceptional vision for the future, his personal residence, his relationships, and his vast wealth and assets were invariably influenced by the intricacies of his compulsions. Muhammad, also being influenced by OCD, charted a compulsive war machine dedicated to obsessive taxation and tribute to his imaginary god, Allah. Like Hughes’ employees, Muslim disciples had to conform to their master’s irrational behavior and were commanded to live where he wanted them to live, and befriend whom he wanted them to befriend.

Today, Muslims will argue to the tooth that these alleged ‘divine’ revelations and his example is the truth, and should be performed to please god. However, the truth is that it’s irrefutable his conduct was indicative of OCD. We know this, as he never ‘revealed’ any divine explanations to justify his irrational behavior. Why should a man wipe his anus an odd number of times? Why should any person put his right shoe on first? Why can’t people drink while standing? To be frank, these exhortations are nonsensical!

Yet, Islamic theology is based around the concept that Muhammad was the ‘perfect human’, completely exempt from any mental disorders, anxieties, self-doubts, irrational thoughts, and psychological imperfections. However, his eccentricities showed no sign of intelligent order, no “method to his madness.” In reality, the man was another statistic in a widely documented behavioral disorder.

OCD is indicative of imperfection, as the brain struggles without the necessary serotonin levels. If Muhammad is considered to be the ‘perfect human’, then his evidential affliction with the condition destroys the claim. His mind was not perfect in the slightest, and in no way was he qualified to lead an already superstitious, ignorant flock who looked up to him for intelligent guidance. In truth, it was like the blind leading the blind.

Islam was facilitated through dogmatic compulsion, but ultimately became a punitive legislative society basing its ethos only on his obsessions. Sadly, those who refused to conform to his irrational behavior were invariably murdered for being ‘apostates’. Ironically, Muhammad’s callous act of burning down the houses of those who forgot to pray was highly uncharacteristic of OCD, and more symptomatic of dangerous narcissism.

However, the truth is that Muhammad was an irritating, pedantic, fussy, neurotic man trapped in a personal universe, plagued with indescribable obsessions. And although he relished being regarded as the center of the universe, he couldn’t handle being the odd one out. Consequentially, his followers were forced to mimic him to protect themselves, or to convince the world they weren’t worshipping a delusional, irrational compulsive individual; as the saying goes “if everyone is doing it, it must be right.”

Finally, the Quranic verse “there shall be no compulsion in religion” is a hypocritical statement regarding Muhammad’s true psychological nature. Muslims are compelled.
________________________
The Mo OCD Understanding of Islam
An Intro by John R. Houk
© December 3, 2019
_______________________
Muhammad's Dietary Compulsions And Jewelry Obsessions

12/2/19
MeWe Group – Islam: The Truth


Monday, December 2, 2019

Motives Behind the False Narrative on Islam and the West


I found a Raymond Ibrahim post on FrontPageMag.com that writes about the poisonous propaganda spewed by Left-Wing Multiculturalist and Islamic Apologists brainwashing susceptible Western minds for decades. You should read to discover if YOU are a victim or a collaborator of said brainwashing.

JRH 12/2/19
Your generosity is always appreciated: 
Please Support SlantRight 2.0
Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
***************************
Motives Behind the False Narrative on Islam and the West
How -- and why -- reality was turned upside down.


By Raymond Ibrahim
December 2, 2019

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Any honest and objective appraisal of Islam’s historic jihad on the Christian world must be eye-opening, to say the very least.  In the first century of its existence (between 632-732) Islam permanently conquered, Arabized, and Islamized nearly three-quarters of the Christian world, thereby permanently severing it.  Europe came to be known as “the West” because it was literally the remaining and westernmost appendage of Christendom not to be swallowed up by Islam.

For roughly a millennium thereafter, Arabs, Berbers, Turks, and Tatars—all of whom called and saw themselves as Muslims—launched raid after raid, all justified and lauded as jihads, into virtually every corner of Europe.  They reached as far as Iceland and provoked the U.S. into its first war as a nation.  The devastation was indescribable; some regions in Europe, particularly in Spain and the Balkans, remain uninhabitable due to the incessant raiding.  Some 15 million Europeans were enslaved during this perennial jihad and, according to contemporary records, treated horrifically.

In short, “if we … ask ourselves how and when the modern notion of Europe and the European identity was born,” writes historian Franco Cardini, “we realize the extent to which Islam was a factor (albeit a negative one) in its creation.  Repeated Muslim aggression against Europe between the seventh to eighth centuries, then between the fourteenth and the eighteenth centuries … was a ‘violent midwife’ to Europe.”

Here the inevitable question arises: How could such a long, well-documented history of unmitigated Islamic aggression that had immense repercussions on the development of Western civilization now be presented as the antithesis of reality?

The answer revolves around a number of modern philosophies—from the Enlightenment to moral/cultural relativism—that have each contributed to an all-pervasive “Narrative” concerning the historic relationship between Islam and the West.  In presenting the West as aggressor and Islam as victim—hence the latter’s ongoing “grievance”-based animosity—this history is as entrenched as it is the reverse of reality.

To understand this, one must first understand that, despite its many manifestations, permutations, and emphases over the centuries, the Narrative’s unspoken driving force has largely been the same: to demonize and thus justify a break away from Europe’s traditional heritage, religion, identity, and mores.  If this sounds farfetched, consider: whereas by any objective standard the West is responsible for practically every boon taken for granted today—from scientific, technological, economic and medicinal advances, to the abolition of slavery and anti-discrimination laws—today no people of any race or civilization despise their heritage except Western people.    Clearly something is amiss.

Or consider how leftists/liberals/progressives who forever whine against any vestige of Western traditionalism, habitually make common cause with Islam—despite the latter’s truly oppressive qualities.  Thus feminists denounce the Western “patriarchy”—but say nothing against the Muslim treatment of women as chattel; homosexuals denounce Christian bakeries—but say nothing against the Muslim execution of homosexuals; multiculturalists denounce Christians who refuse to suppress their faith to accommodate the religious sensibilities of Muslim minorities—but say nothing against the entrenched and open Muslim persecution of Christians.

The reason for these discrepancies is simple:  “The enemy [Islam] of my enemy [Christianity] is my friend.”

From here, how and why such a formally well-known history of Muslim aggression against Europe was not merely suppressed but reversed should start making sense: of all non-European, non-Christian peoples, only Muslims lived alongside and interacted with (that is, constantly encroached and warred on) Europe for over a millennium; this made Muslims the only people—the only foil—that could be used to support the Narrative’s argument against premodern Europe.  But first an intellectually satisfying way of casting Muslims as victims not conquerors was needed.

Enter literary professor Edward Said’s 1978 book, Orientalism.  Its central thesis is that the Orientalists—the Europeans who began the academic study of the East centuries ago—were not writing objectively about Muslims and their history, but rather intentionally slandering and stereotyping them in order to justify dominating them during the colonial era.

This made perfect sense—but only because the postmodern Western mind had already been primed for it.  For if, as Marxist Materialism teaches, ideas/religions have no influence on history (and thus, economic want, not “jihad,” caused Muslims to expand); if, as Relativism and its spawn Multiculturalism teach, there are no absolute truths, religious or otherwise (and thus no culture or civilization is “better” than another); if, as pop psychology teaches, violent and negative behavior is always a product of societal injustices (and thus the more Muslims behave violently, the more that only proves they are frustrated victims)—then what does one make of the aforementioned centuries of European writings that uniformly depict Muslims as ideologically driven by violence and lust?

Simple: dismiss them all as bigoted and hypocritical lies by nefarious Europeans intent on demonizing a superior, more tolerant faith and civilization.   Thus a whole new academic approach to Islam—stripped of all historic writings not conforming to the Narrative—was born.  History would no longer shape ideas and attitudes; rather, preexisting ideas and attitudes—wishful thinking—would shape history.

Bernard Lewis, himself a target of Edward Said’s Orientalism, summarized this new approach—or “pseudo history”—well:

According to a currently fashionable epistemological view, absolute truth is either nonexistent or unattainable.  Therefore, truth doesn’t matter; facts don’t matter.  All discourse is a manifestation of a power relationship, and all knowledge is slanted.  Therefore, accuracy doesn’t matter; evidence doesn’t matter.  All that matters is the attitude—the motives and purposes—of the user of knowledge, and this may simply be claimed for oneself or imputed to another.  In imputing motives, the irrelevance of truth, facts, evidence, and even plausibility is a great help.  The mere assertion suffices” (Islam and the West, 115).

Orientalism’s success lay less in anything intrinsic to it—American classicist Bruce Thornton characterizes it as an “incoherent amalgam of dubious postmodern theory, sentimental Third Worldism, glaring historical errors, and Western guilt”—and more because it fit the West’s prevailing zeitgeist (which, of course, thrives on “dubious postmodern theory, sentimental Third Worldism, glaring historical errors, and Western guilt”).

Nor does the Narrative predominate today because people are well read or pay attention to academe; as French historian Marc Ferro demonstrated in his Cinema and History (1988), the overwhelming majority of Western people’s knowledge of history comes from movies.  And almost any major film dealing with premodern Europeans and Muslims—Robin Hood (1991), Kingdom of Heaven (2005), etc.—contrasts hypocritical, intolerant, and fanatical Christians with sophisticated, advanced, and tolerant Muslims.   Commenting on such films back in 1997, Lewis wrote, “The misrepresentation of the past in the cinema is probably the most fertile and effective source of such misinformation at the present time…”

Twenty years later the Narrative has only metastasized and infected all aspects of public life, including politics and so-called “mainstream news.”   Meanwhile, social and other media giants—YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter—increasingly censor material that contradicts the Narrative.

Such is how a previously well-known history was turned upside down and used to weaken the West—the greatest sin of which is ever again to think or behave like its “awful” ancestors did concerning Islam.

For more on the true history between Islam and the West, see the author’s recent Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West
+++++++++++++++++++++
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
_______________________
© Copyright 2019, FrontPageMag.com



The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites.  The magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented over the last two years by the presence of four  Shillman Fellows in Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.

DiscoverTheNetworks.com, launched in 2005, is the largest publicly accessible database defining the chief groups and individuals of the Left and their organizational interlocks.  It is a full service encyclopedia of the … READ THE REST