DONATE

Thursday, May 23, 2019

Fox Co-Host Dagen McDowell Unloads on Leftie Juan Williams...


I love it when a Conservative publicly spanks a Leftie on Nation TV for selling Leftist lies. That’s what Degan McDowell did to Juan Williams on The Five.

JRH 5/23/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:

*********************
Fox Co-Host Dagen McDowell Unloads on Leftie Juan Williams: “The Press That Lied To Us For Three Years?” (VIDEO)

Posted by Nwo Report
May 23, 2019

During a recent episode of The Five on FOX News, co-host Dagen McDowell went off on a great rant about the Russia conspiracy and the sleazy players in the deep state.

From FOX News:

Dagen McDowell: Obama-era FBI, DOJ officials ‘worried’ what Barr’s review into Russia probe could find

Are Obama-era intelligence officials worried about what Attorney General William Barr’s investigation Ito the origins of the Russia probe will find?

Fox Business’ Dagen McDowell believes they are, and said that is why some Democrats are questioning Barr’s motives.

“They are trying to discredit him because they are worried, people who worked in the Obama administration, in the FBI and in the CIA and the intelligence community, they are worried. Whether it’s Brennan or Comey or even subordinates of both of them. They are worried about what Bill Barr and John Durham and the Inspector General Michael Horowitz are going to find,” McDowell said while co-hosting “The Five.”…

McDowell also said Americans deserve to know the truth.

“They deserve answers. There is nothing wrong with a thorough look at it.”

At one point, Juan Williams, the liberal on the panel, suggested that we already know the truth because of the press.

McDowell exploded. Watch:


______________________
Published by Nwo Report
Once dismissed by cynics as a “conspiracy theory the New World Order is rapidly becoming a reality. We look at its origins, how it operates and how it affects the lives of everyone. View all posts by Nwo Report

© 2019 NWO REPORT

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

7 Reasons Why the Uranium One Scandal Won’t Go Away



There is one sure truism in this day and age: If a member of the Democratic Party’s lips are moving, a LIE is spewing forth. When you hear a Dem claim Obama was scandal free or not a single whisper of a scandal, THAT DEM IS LYING!

ERGO the Dem Claim that the Uranium One scandal is debunked and settled, THAT DEM IS…!

(This Epoch Times post is an updated version from the original 5/9/19 post.)

JRH 5/22/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:
Please Support SlantRight 2.0
*******************
7 Reasons Why the Uranium One Scandal Won’t Go Away

May 9, 2019 Updated: May 22, 2019


Commentary

The Trump–Russia collusion narrative is officially dead, now that special counsel Robert Mueller has concluded there is no evidence of collusion.

With the cloud of the Mueller probe lifted, President Donald Trump can now go on the offensive with an attorney general who appears ready to drop the hammer on corruption in Washington. Moreover, Attorney General William Barr doesn’t appear to be intimidated by Democratic lawmakers who have already threatened him with impeachment and even incarceration.

Former President Barack Obama’s allies have lately claimed his term in office was “scandal-free,” a claim his critics find “laughable.” Abuses of power under the Obama administration ranged from drone-strike assassinations of U.S. citizens to the IRS’s targeting of conservatives. In fact, the Obama administration was a magnet for scandals. One of the largest—and perhaps least understood—involves the Russian takeover of Uranium One, a Canadian mining company with large uranium holdings in the United States.

The mainstream press has repeatedly declared the Russian purchase of Uranium One a “debunked conspiracy theory.” But it’s no theory, nor has it been debunked. The Uranium One deal was complicated and had many moving parts, which also explains why misinformation about it has spread widely.

It’s true that the Clinton Foundation received undisclosed millions from Uranium One stakeholders—such as the $2.35 million from board Chairman Ian Telfer. The Obama administration did allow the Russians to acquire domestic nuclear assets critical to U.S. national security. But minor inaccuracies in the soundbites have allowed self-appointed fact-checkers such as PolitiFact and Snopes to selectively “debunk” the larger story without critically examining the full set of facts.

In the coming months, readers may find the Uranium One scandal coming back into focus. For that purpose, it’s time to set the record straight.

Here are seven reasons why the Uranium One scandal isn’t going away:

1. Uranium One is the largest foreign-influence scandal in US history.

If you ask any American what the largest political scandal in our history was, you will likely find that former President Richard Nixon’s Watergate affair tops the list. Nixon’s spying on political opponents left such a bruise on America’s collective psyche that adding “-gate” to later political scandals is an homage. For Nixon, the coverup was worse than the crime.

Scandals that result in the impeachment of a sitting president are hard to top, which is why the Clinton–Lewinsky fiasco also ranks high among U.S. political scandals. Those shenanigans—and the more recent targeting by Obama of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign—demonstrate clear abuses of power, but have little to do with foreign influence.

The Uranium One scandal, however, involves alleged bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering at the highest levels of the U.S. nuclear industry. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) informant-turned-whistleblower William Douglas Campbell infiltrated Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle and claims to have video evidence of “suitcases full of bribery cash.”

Uranium One Scandal Collage of Facts [Click embedded link for FULL SIZE]

It’s now known that former President Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 by a Kremlin-backed bank to deliver a speech in Moscow just months before the Uranium One sale was approved by the Obama administration. Clinton sought approval from his wife’s State Department to meet with a Russian board member of Rosatom, the state-owned nuclear agency. Clinton ended up meeting directly with Putin instead, who thanked the former president for the visit. Soon after, Bill Clinton was paid a half million dollars by Russian interests, and Hillary Clinton’s State Department allowed the Russian takeover of U.S. nuclear assets.

When Peter Schweizer first broke the Uranium One scandal in April 2015, Hillary Clinton’s apologists immediately claimed that her State Department was just one of several Obama administration agencies that approved the sale—but is that really any better? Because if none of the Obama agencies who approved that deal found any issues with it, perhaps other players were just as conflicted as Bill and Hillary Clinton.

The Uranium One scandal contains elements of corruption and abuses of power. Neither Watergate nor the Lewinsky affair involved payments to top White House officials by foreign adversaries in exchange for favorable policies. However, Uranium One did—and the payments were massive.

The $145 million figure refers to the collective “commitments and donations” made to the Clinton Foundation by “investors who profited from the deal,” as documented extensively in Schweizer’s book “Clinton Cash” and confirmed by The New York Times. Any uncertainty in the dates or amounts is due exclusively to the Clinton Foundation, which reports its donations once per year and in wide ranges—or as Schweizer calls it, “the Clinton blur.” The bulk of the $145 million figure came from longtime Clinton friend Frank Giustra. Another major Clinton donor included in that figure is uranium investor Frank Holmes, who was grilled on his timely donations by CNBC.

2. Uranium One was never just a Clinton scandal; it’s also an Obama scandal.

In addition to Obama’s State Department, his Department of Justice (DOJ) had a lead role on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) that approved the sale. Thus, top DOJ and FBI officials share blame for not blocking the transaction in 2010. That could explain why Obama’s top DOJ and FBI personnel stonewalled their own field office investigations involving Hillary Clinton’s Uranium One conflicts. Those investigations effectively exonerated her just before the 2016 election.

The DOJ’s role in the 2010 CFIUS review is troubling. No one from the DOJ involved with that committee raised any objections to the deal, despite separate ongoing FBI investigations into Russian espionage and racketeering schemes—schemes that specifically targeted the U.S. nuclear industry. Despite hard evidence of these schemes, the FBI, the DOJ, and other Obama agencies nevertheless raised no objections to the Russian takeover of U.S. nuclear assets.

The fact that Clinton’s State Department wasn’t the only Obama agency in the CFIUS review with conflicting motives must be fully investigated. The Democrats are right, Clinton couldn’t have approved the deal singlehandedly. They seem to think that this exonerates Clinton, when, in fact, it really damns the broader Obama administration.

Epoch Times VIDEO: The mainstream press has repeatedly declared the Russian purchase of Uranium One a “debunked conspiracy theory.” …

3. Uranium One likely played a major role in the origins of the Trump–Russia collusion hoax.

Last month, Barr pledged to investigate the origins of the Trump–Russia probe, also known as “Spygate.” As this latest saga unfolds, note that many of the same players in the Obama targeting of the Trump campaign also played lead investigative roles in each of the Russian nuclear schemes.

James Comey, Robert Mueller, Andrew McCabe, and Andrew Weissmann all appear to have been involved in both the investigation of long-running Russian nuclear conspiracies and in the attempt to unseat a duly elected president who threatened to expose them.

At the time of the sale, Obama’s FBI—headed by Mueller—had intimate knowledge of ongoing Russian espionage and bribery schemes, but the deal went through anyway. McCabe headed the FBI investigation, which began in 2009, into the bribery, kickbacks, and money laundering linked to Uranium One. Weissmann and Rosenstein headed the DOJ prosecution of the Russian principals and announced the charges, years later in 2014.

One felon received 48 months for crimes that could have carried up to a 20-year sentence. Those convictions didn’t occur until after Obama’s top officials approved the sale. The DOJ’s failure to publicly object to the Uranium One purchase, despite knowing about ongoing bribery and espionage schemes, raises a major red flag.

The overlap of the previous Russian influence investigations with the 2016 Trump–Russia investigation deserves a thorough review by Barr.

4. ‘What did Obama know, and when did he know it?’

In autumn 2015, an FBI agent sent notices to the Obama CFIUS agencies that required them to preserve their Uranium One records. Those records remain secret but may shed light on the largest questions of all: What did Obama know about the Russians’ nuclear schemes, when did he know it, and why did his administration allow them to proceed?

The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) is legally required to submit a threat analysis of any sale under review to CFIUS. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) has demanded the threat analysis performed by Obama’s then-DNI James Clapper. Notably, Clapper has a history of lying under oath to Congress and is currently under fire for intelligence leaks that were damaging to the Trump campaign.

Once it’s made public, Clapper’s threat analysis of the Uranium One deal will be very telling—either the analysis was thorough, or it was not. That’s bad news for the Obama administration in either case.

The Hill’s John Solomon framed the issue another way in October 2018:

“Since the emergence of [Uranium One whistleblower Campbell’s] undercover work, there has been one unanswered question of national importance.

“Did the FBI notify then-President Obama, Hillary Clinton, and other leaders on the CFIUS board about Rosatom’s dark deeds before the Uranium One sale was approved, or did the bureau drop the ball and fail to alert policymakers?”

Neither outcome is particularly comforting.

5. Whistleblowers are ready to talk. An ‘avalanche’ is coming.

There are now at least three credible Uranium One whistleblowers who have provided information to authorities since the story first broke.

As previously mentioned, William D. Campbell was an FBI operative who had infiltrated Putin’s inner circle. Campbell worked directly with Rosatom chief Sergei Kiriyenko, who has since been promoted to Putin’s first deputy chief of staff. Campbell documented evidence of the Russians’ nuclear ambitions and their strategy to infiltrate the U.S. nuclear supply chain through the Uranium One purchase. According to Campbell, Moscow paid millions in an influence operation targeting Obama administration decision-makers.

Last November, 16 FBI agents raided the home of former FBI contractor Dennis Nathan Cain, a federally protected whistleblower who claims that he can provide documented evidence that the FBI and DOJ failed to investigate possible criminal activity related to the Clinton Foundation and the Russian takeover of Uranium One. Cain recently tweeted his appreciation for Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.): “Thank you @RepDougCollins for releasing this testimony. It proves the DoJ under BHO was running a two-tier system of justice that allowed politically connected get away [sic] with serious crimes. What other crimes were ignored?”

Former top Uranium One executive Scott Melbye attended the conservative CPAC conference this year. Melbye hammered the Uranium One scandal, calling Clinton’s role “bizarre,” according to The Daily Beast.

“People who say that’s exaggerated or there’s nothing there—there’s definitely something there,” Melbye said. “As an American, I’m outraged at that whole episode.”

Campbell, Cain, Melbye, and others appear to have more than enough inside information relating to Uranium One to demonstrate widespread corruption at the highest levels of the Obama administration. In addition, more whistleblowers are expected to come forward with more bombshell reports.

6. Top GOP lawmakers are not going to let Uranium One be swept under the rug.

Former Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has been tracking the Uranium One case since day one, and has sent numerous letters to Obama agencies to clarify their roles.

In a statement last month, Grassley said: “I’ve been pushing for years for more answers about this [the Uranium One] transaction that allowed the Russian government to acquire U.S. uranium assets. I’ve received classified and unclassified briefings about it from multiple agencies. And I’ve identified some FBI intelligence reports that may shed more light on the transaction. … If the Democrats want to be consistent, they’ll have to treat the Clinton, Uranium One, and Russia-related investigations the same [as the Mueller report]. Anything less than that reeks of political gamesmanship and sets a clear double standard.”

Barrasso expressed early concerns. In a 2010 letter to Obama, the senator warned: “This transaction would give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America’s uranium production capacity. Equally alarming, this sale gives ARMZ [Uranium Holding Co.] a significant stake in uranium mines in Kazakhstan.”

More recently, Barrasso has pushed to expand the investigations of the sale and has demanded answers regarding Uranium One’s exports of nuclear materials outside the United States—an unacceptable development, as first reported by John Solomon.

Reps. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), and several of their colleagues—notably Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) and Ron DeSantis (now Florida governor)—have repeatedly demanded answers about the Obama administration’s approval of the Russian takeover of Uranium One. GOP lawmakers introduced a resolution last year excoriating the Obama FBI and DOJ for their roles in the Spygate scandal, which they linked to the Uranium One scandal.

It’s safe to say that these lawmakers are invested in the full exposure of Uranium One events and bringing swift justice to the Obama officials who were responsible.

7. President Trump and Attorney General Barr appear to be ready to drop the hammer.

Barr has found the Uranium One matter significant and worthy of a full investigation. In a 2017 interview with The New York Times, Barr said that the DOJ was “abdicating its responsibility” if it wasn’t investigating the Clinton Foundation vis-à-vis the Uranium One deal. In Barr’s confirmation hearing this year, Democrats grilled him on his support for the Uranium One “conspiracy theory.” While Barr seemed to distance himself during the hearing, New York Times reporter Peter Baker subsequently leaked an email in which Barr said he “believed that the predicate for investigating the uranium deal, as well as the foundation, is far stronger than any basis for investigating so-called, ‘collusion.'”

It’s clear that Barr doesn’t believe that the Uranium One deal has been fully investigated.

To date, Trump has been fully cleared of all allegations of collusion with Russia. Multiple separate investigations led by special counsel Mueller, the House Intelligence Committee, and the Senate Intelligence Committee have all concluded that there was no collusion. And yet, Democrats in Congress now want Mueller to testify and want to hold Barr in contempt if he doesn’t surrender himself to their endless interrogations.

If the Democrats want to go to war with Barr, he appears to have more than enough evidence to expose corruption that would crush the Obama administration and its defenders—starting with Spygate and ending with Uranium One.

At its core, the Uranium One deal is quite simple: Putin wanted long-term access to the U.S. nuclear supply chain. Decision-makers in Washington were under no obligation to give Putin what he wanted. Politics aside, does anyone really think that Putin deserves any access to an industry critical to the American energy sector and national security? Of course not.

Yet, in 2010, the Obama administration acquiesced and Putin gained a significant stake in an industry critical to U.S. energy and national security. Period.
_________________________
Seamus Bruner is the author of the book “Compromised: How Money and Politics Drive FBI Corruption.”

Please make a small contribution to The Epoch Times and you’ll be making a big difference. …

Copyright @ 2000 – 2019 – The Epoch Times

ABOUT TET

The Epoch Times, published by The Epoch Times Association, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, is dedicated to seeking the truth through insightful and independent journalism.

We stand outside of political interests and the pursuit of profit, to educate readers about today’s most critical issues with the intention of broadening minds and uplifting society. A well-informed society is the cornerstone of a flourishing democracy.

Being independent, we investigate issues overlooked—or avoided—by other media outlets. We do this because we believe journalism must play the role of being truly responsible to society.

We strive to READ THE REST


Tuesday, May 21, 2019

The Fishing King and the Donkey


Every once in awhile I run into something so hilarious it must be shared even if I can’t vouch for a specific author. I came upon such an occasion while surfing the Social Media Platform USA Life.


On the Re-Elect Trump 2020 Group, Terry Hill posted a humorous political parable on the origin of the Democratic Party. Hill didn’t provide a title so I am arbitrarily making one up.

JRH 5/21/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:


********************
The Fishing King and the Donkey

Posted by Terry Hill
May 20, 2019

The king wanted to go fishing, and he asked the royal weather forecaster the forecast for the next few hours. The palace meteorologist assured him that there was no chance of rain.

So the king and the queen went fishing. On the way he met a man with a fishing pole riding on a donkey, and he asked the man if the fish were biting.

The fisherman said, "Your Majesty, you should return to the palace! In just a short time I expect a huge rain storm."

The king replied: "I hold the palace meteorologist in high regard. He is an educated and experienced professional. Besides, I pay him very high wages. He gave me a very different forecast. I trust him."

So the king continued on his way.

However, in a short time a torrential rain fell from the sky. The King and Queen were totally soaked.

Furious, the king returned to the palace and gave the order to fire the meteorologist.

Then he summoned the fisherman and offered him the prestigious position of royal forecaster.

The fisherman said, "Your Majesty, I do not know anything about forecasting. I obtain my information from my donkey. If I see my donkey's ears drooping, it means with certainty that it will rain."

So the king hired the donkey.

And so began the practice of hiring dumb asses to work in influential positions of government.

And thus the symbol of the democrat party was born. The practice is unbroken to this day.


_____________________
Edited by John R. Houk


Monday, May 20, 2019

Brennan’s Treachery Comes Full Circle...


Adina Kutnicki takes a look at former CIA Director John Brennan. Kutnicki asserts the unsurprising to Conservatives about Brennan; viz., liar and criminal. Of course the Kutnicki rundown implicates other crooked Dems but Brennan is the focus.

Amidst the Kutnicki examination are three videos. The first is an interview with John Guandolo talking of Brennan clandestinely converting to Islam. The second video is a little over an hour long and posted May 13, 2019. The second video’s theme is that Brennan will be imminently indicted for treason-related crimes and pedophilia. As to the second, we’ve all heard these notices of impending actions in the past and if you are like me – I’ll believe it when I see it (really ONLY the first 1/3 of the hour is relevant – the rest money making ads). The third video is a Fox News/Catherine Herridge report (posted 5/15/19) implicating Brennan, Comey and Clapper in pushing unverified Steele Dossier knowing the info was unsubstantiated.

I so much hope Kutnicki’s gleanings ring true even though I am maintaining a wait-and-see attitude for actual verification.

JRH 5/20/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:

**********************
Brennan’s Treachery Comes Full Circle – As Evidenced At These Pages, 2013 To Date

By Adina Kutnicki
May 20, 2019



“The Shepherd Boy And The Wolf”, a classic short story, is often taught to junior and senior high school students to illustrate the importance, relevance, and contextual framework of morality. Its overall basis breaks down thusly: “once a liar, always a liar.” Similarly, “once a crook, always a crook” should be considered a comparative axiom; an extrapolation thereof. Bare bones lessons in morality.

AS such, it is hardly a shock that John Brennan, a serial liar with a monstrous size crooked bent, continues to be exposed at these pages. In fact, he made his debut (alongside HUSSEIN Obama, and the equally lying and criminally bent, Hill) in January 2013 – a mere few months after this site’s inception. That fast. Not for nothing.

IN this regard, before evidencing Brennan’s full circle and blessed reckoning  (now that the deep state sh*t is hitting the fan ala the blow-back from the bought and paid for claptrap-filled dossier), let’s perform a righteous cleansing akin to a colonoscopy. No kidding.

CLEANSING & MORE:


[Posted by Ben Barrack
Published on Sep 3, 2013

John Guandolo served as a U.S. Marine and as an FBI Agent. He is a Muslim Brotherhood expert who was one of several individuals to contribute to the Team B II report. Earlier this year, he appeared with Tom Trento of the United West and made the claim that CIA Director John Brennan converted to Islam while in Saudi Arabia in the 1990's. The interview ran nearly 50 minutes but has been pared down to the best 10 in this clip.

This interview originally took place in February of 2013. The original link is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlni3UpYaUc]

·       Naturally, and at all costs, the Director of the CIA is sworn to protect America. This is a sacred duty. But when a rogue, anti-American takes over the helm, well, many levels of hell are bubbling and competing to become unleashed. To wit, he more than warranted top billing in January 2013 – when appointed to this most sensitive and powerful post. As is said, timing is everything. Therefore, said top billing preceded the start of his tenure on March 8, 2013. So, to commence the unmasking, the first directive from herein is to peer into “The Intersection Between John Brennan And A ‘Mysterious’ Death During Obama’s First Term.” And it is within this initial walk-through that his treachery will start to gel. Cement. Indeed, from the get-go, his lying and criminal mind-set is of piece with third world leaders. Juntas.


·       Now that that task is accomplished, let’s move on. Akin to whiplash (sorry for that), this site was forced to fast forward to less than a month later (February 11, 2013, to be exact), and to level another warning shot to the American people: “John Brennan, A Muslim Convert, Is A MEGA Muslim Mafia Infiltrator!” Say it ain’t so….

·       But we are far from done. Not at all. Tragically, how many travesties can one parasite – who oversees America’s “spook” agency, no less – be guilty of? This query was asked and answered on March 11,2013: “John Brennan Eschews The Bill of Rights: Another Nail In The American Coffin.” Beyond the pale.

·       Alas, it is hardly shocking that this site reported in June 2013: “CIA Brennan’s Spooky Skeletons Creep To The Fore.” Now, the fact that it isn’t even shocking is what is so shocking – unless one is living in a banana republic!

·       Moving right along to Brennan’s growing compendium of criminally-inclined actions, guess where else his ‘activities’ were unearthed? Well, in September 2013, this bombshell was noted: “UPDATE: The Assassination Of Michael Hastings & Its Nexus To Obama’s Bona fides & Passport – Brennan’s Sticky Fingers In The Mix!”

·       Oh My….here we go again….round and round Brennan’s twisted treachery. But, this time, to May 2014: “Brennan’s Deadly Fingerprints Are All Over Benghazigate.” Yes, that Benghazigate!

·       Indeed, how much more can patriotic Americans be expected to bear before…..Regardless, hang on tight. How many know about the central part he played in releasing Taliban terrorists, you know, those captured by the sweat and blood of U.S. soldiers? If curious, read about the betrayal here.

·       Still yet, if your heart can withstand it, let’s head to December 2014 to recalculate and recalibrate the damage accrued, so far, by querying: “Why Did Obama & Brennan Gift  A ‘Torture’ Report To The Islamic Ummah?” Why, indeed.

·       Never-ending. In March 2015, guess what Brennan, Islam’s full-on protector, did? He expunged Islam from ISIS, that’s what! Therefore, isn’t it prudent to ask: To whom was he reporting – in his capacity as the Director of America’s front-arm foreign spy agency – the nation’s secrets and assets? Rhetorical. Resultant, isn’t it clear where his loyalties lie?

·       Even so, stay strong, fellow patriots. Keep reading. We are almost down to the (“cleansing-recap”) wire. After all, knowledge is power. In January 2016, it was reported at these pages that Brennan infiltrated, yes, infiltrated, the Charter School system for the benefit of Islam – never mind the public school system which has been infected for years. As such, the question becomes two-fold: Why is this no longer shocking? and, why isn’t it plastered all over the so-called mainstream media? Hmm.

·       Consequentially, when the Islamist-in-Chief left office and the long-knives came out for President Trump’s scalp, it behooved recapping (in April 2017) the initial unmasking(s) of Brennan (cited above) – knowing full well what a mega huge force he is in the “deep state”; a chief traitor, among a long line of deeply embedded cohorts!

NOW, as we power onward to the present state of (traitorous) affairs, here’s some additional ammunition – all of which was warned about at this site, in one form or another.
  
IN the main, isn’t it time for Brennan (and fellow surrogates) to go down?? Apparently. Faster….faster…..



Published on May 13, 2019

Former CIA Director John Brennan is about to be indicted for high treason, an attempted coup against President Donald Trump, and for and child trafficking. A former Intelligence officer says when this indictment is unsealed, expect violence and civil unrest the likes of which this nation has never seen before. David Zublick unseals the truth in this special report!]

BUT, as always, disputes are taking place – as to which of his facilitators at DOJ are the main collaborators behind the trumped-up Steele dossier. Six of one, half a dozen of the other…..


[Posted by Fox News
Published on May 15, 2019

A former CIA official puts the blame on former FBI Director Comey after an email chain implicates former CIA Director Brennan; Catherine Herridge reports from Washington. READ THE REST]

BUT, most significantly, rational folks can discern: America has come to a point in time, a ‘do or die’ fork in the road, notably, a critical juncture in its modern history. Know this: Without a full-on cleansing, a reckoning, and jailing(s) alike, the Republic will die – sooner than later.

AND while this is not a prognosis that is easy to deliver, it is hardly the time to despair. Weaken. For truth dare be told, in reality, it is past time to BUCK UP!!

AGAIN, faster…..faster…..



{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED:

·       This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.

·       If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad had to be written!}
___________________

Adina Kutnicki ABOUT PAGE


Sunday, May 19, 2019

Life Is A Sacred Gift



Individual States of the American Union are pushing back against the godless SCOTUS decision of 1973 in Roe v. Wade which legalized baby-killing for any reason. Justin Smith elaborates on this sanctity of human life usurped by Leftist Court decisions.

JRH 5/19/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:


*******************
Life Is A Sacred Gift
The Unborn Child's Right to Life

By Justin O. Smith
Sent  5/18/2019 7:18 PM

Intellectual dishonesty is the only condition that allows so many Americans to call the murder of unborn children "a right to privacy". It allows the sacred union between men and women and their joining in love to be diminished and made so casual to the point that any product of sex can simply be tossed in the garbage, like so much refuse. It has become a cover for denying one's own responsibility and the consequences for any 'mistake', as far too many deny their own irresponsible behavior, and instead, they relax comfortably in their ignoble position that destroys the sanctity of life and kills a baby that has a soul, without a valid reason sanctioned by God, an act tantamount to infanticide. 

Recently, after chaos broke out during a debate over a proposed abortion bill in Alabama's state Senate, Lieutenant Governor Will Ainsworth said, "It is important that we pass this statewide abortion ban legislation and begin a long overdue effort to directly challenge Roe v. Wade".  

Not long afterwards on May 14th 2019, Alabama Governor Kaye Ivey signed into law the Alabama Human Life Protection Act, without exceptions for rape and incest, that was approved by overwhelming majorities in both chambers of the legislature. The Governor noted: "To the bill's many supporters, this legislation stands as a powerful testament to Alabamian's deeply held belief that every life is precious and that every life is a sacred gift from God."  

This is the issue nationwide. Far too many Americans are not willing to acknowledge the fact that sex between a man and a woman is a sacred matter ordained by God. They are not willing to admit that the product of such unions -- a little vulnerable innocent live baby -- cannot and must not be taken away on a whim, due to the inconvenience it may cause them. 

Abby Johnson, one of the youngest ever to head a Planned Parenthood clinic, had her come to Jesus moment at a time in her life, when she had already facilitated nearly 22,000 abortions. One day in October 2009, she was asked to assist in an abortion at the clinic in Texas. Here is her emotional testimony: "Ultimately I left [Planned Parenthood] after witnessing a live ... procedure where I saw a thirteen week old baby fight and struggle for his life against the abortion instruments only to lose his life, and I knew there was humanity in the womb. I knew that for all these years I had essentially put the rights of the woman above the rights of the unborn child, and it became very clear to me in that moment that our rights should be equal -- that one shouldn't supersede the other."  

It is accurate to state that a newly created human being is human because it has its own very specific and unique DNA. Life begins at fertilization and any action that puts an end to human life is indisputably a homicide, not matter how cute, obtuse or disingenuous one wants to be on the topic. Unborn children are not property or parasites to be discarded at will. 

It's important to note here that Roe v. Wade is a 1973 lawless ruling by the Supreme Court that has been foisted upon a majority of states in stark contravention of actual laws that they passed. There is not one actual law in existence that states a woman has a right to an abortion, and nowhere does any such thing exist within the constitution, something the Supreme Court conceded in the Roe decision itself. The Court uncertainly concluded that any guarantee of personal privacy only extended to areas such as procreation, contraception and childrearing. 

Shortly after Roe was delivered by the Court, John Hart Ely, a supporter of legalized abortion and a Harvard Law School professor, wrote: "Roe is bad ... because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be."  

Justice Blackmun offered no sound logic in support of his decision, and in the forty-six years since the Roe v. Wade ruling shoved its way into American society, no one has produced a convincing defense of Roe on its own terms and merit.  

Before Roe v. Wade this issue fell to each respective state to determine democratically through the duly elected representatives. The Supreme Court's dictate was erroneous on its face, and this judicial tyranny resulted in the circumvention of the will of the people at the time and the deprivation of the states' authority and rights under the 9th and 10th Amendments, every bit as bad as if a despot had been in control of America. 

Much of the precedence for our legal system emanates from English Common Law, and as such, we would be negligent if we didn't note that many early U.S. lawyers such as Louis Brandeis and Sam Warren drew heavily on English Common Law in 1890, when they wrote the Right to Privacy. They revealed that William Blackstone, an English legal scholar whose words shaped our Declaration of Independence, declared specific rights for the unborn child writing: "Qui in utero, est pro jam nato habetur quoties de ejus commodo quaeritur: One who is in the womb is held as already born, whenever a question arises for its benefit." 

Currently, there are nearly twenty other states poised to act more stridently to ban abortion, and with recent changes in the membership of the Supreme Court, any challenges have a good chance to be struck down. It also appears that some states are purposefully crafting these laws precisely to see Roe v. Wade rescinded in the affirmative support for the life of the unborn child. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch are probably the most certain pro-life Justices; in February of this year, Thomas wrote that Roe was among the Court's "most notoriously incorrect decisions", and he gave the 1857 decision of Dred Scott v. Sanford as another equally bad decision that said black slaves were property and not citizens.  

People just don't understand the Constitution, if they agree to submit to unconstitutional rulings, especially in light of the fact that the Supreme Court has admitted to being wrong over 300 times by reversing their own rulings. And more importantly, Americans no longer seem to understand their own divine nature having been created in the image of God.  

I grew up understanding that all souls were known to God long before He gave Us our human form, by way of my dear Grandmother's constant reminder as she recited Jeremiah 1:5 from the Old Testament: "Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you. Before you were born, I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations." Just as God knows and loves each of Us long before we are born, Americans, people everywhere, must learn to love the Unborn Child while he or she is still in the womb.  

Americans must fight for the right of all human life to exist, despite the sad truth that a generation and a half have lived in America seeing legality as a basis for their morality, no matter how wrong or heinous the act. Abortion must be revealed for the morally reprehensible act it truly is, an act that has reduced medicine to tearing limbs from feeling beautiful unborn babies, while we also move American society towards ending the federal legality of abortion and returning the issue to the states.  Americans must stop killing babies for fear of poverty and any other rationalized false justification. We must protect our children in the streets and in the womb and stop this insane acceptance of infanticide, or surely one day face the wrath of God. 

By Justin O. Smith
____________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Source links are by the Editor.

© Justin O. Smith