DONATE

Friday, June 22, 2018

Isn’t the Key Word ‘ILLEGAL’ in Illegal Immigration?


John R. Houk
© June 22, 2018

Thanks largely to the Mainstream Media’s (MSM) Trump Derangement Syndrome, propaganda created hysteria has occurred about illegal immigrant children being separated from illegal alien parents entering and getting  caught by immigration authorities at the U.S. border.

I claim this is a manufactured hysteria because of the fact former President Obama used the separation policy extensively with zero moral outcry from the MSM. I find it particularly disgusting that this same MSM acts like President Trump’s zero toleration policy on illegal immigration initiated the child/parent separation policy.

On a personal level I don’t have a problem with separating illegal alien children from their illegal alien parents. The key word is “ILLEGAL”! Since parents are adults knowing fully well that breaking a law will have legal consequences. It is unreasonable to hold the illegal alien children accountable for the illegal alien parents law breaking actions.

The Dems have successfully used the manufactured hysteria to get a political win which I am certain they hope is a pawn move for open borders. The Dems have cajoled President Trump to use the power of Executive Order to keep children and parents together when they illegally enter the USA.

I can’t wait to see how the government funds the policy change since the Dems have no intention of funding any immigration reform proposed or supported by President Trump. After all, a Presidential EO is only as good as the President is in Office. AND an EO does not have funding power, that can only come from Congress.

AGAIN, thanks to MSM created hysteria and their comrade accomplices the Dems, the camps where the illegal alien children were housed are being housed have been equated with Nazi concentration internment camps. The kind of camps used by Nazi-Germans to ethnically cleanse Jews from the earth during WWII.

Emaciated Jewish Children in Nazi Concentration Camp

While the MSM showed photos of illegal alien children in dog cages from the Obama Administration days, the reality was illegal alien children experience something more akin to Summer Camp that American parents would send their kids to (if they could afford it).



Posted by IllinoisNinth
Published on Jun 15, 2018

Visit to Southwest Key facility for illegal alien children separated from parents - El Cajon, CA - June 15, 2018.

Footage provided to journalists by HHS.

My point is I had little problem with the children/parent situation. If the illegal alien parents didn’t want to be separated from their children, they should either not have made arduous trek from wherever or at some point begin the process gaining legal immigrant status or legal refugee status.

Now the inspiration for this blog post comes from Ari Bussel. Bussel sent an email conversation between himself and a gal named Joy. Bussel was responding to a poor-illegal-immigrant-children-plight email seeking political and financial support to deliver these abused kids from President Trump’s zero tolerance policy.

Just a head’s up about the Joy portion of the email. She provides a Liberal plan of action including links to enable a Liberal action response. Obviously, I am not suggesting my fellow Conservatives to work the Liberal agenda.

********************
Re: Helping Migrant Families Separated at the Border

By Ari Bussel
Sent 6/21/2018 7:36 PM

Dear John,

There is so much controversy around the sweet, innocent children (just use the word “children,” and the heart melts) and the hated, horrible, devilish President Trump.  He must hate them!

Following is an illuminating exchange - Joy is my mother’s cousin.  Joy’s parents were married in Chicago in 1929.  My mother side of the family was then in Europe, where both were to be exterminated just over a decade later.

Jewish Americans have traditionally been Democrats.  Joy, and most of our entire extended family (numbering many hundreds, including one that every kid in the country would recognize the name), is Democrat.  So we disagree and fight and love each other not any less.

However, comparing the children of those trying to enter the country illegally and the amazing treatment and conditions they receive to children - like my parents - during the Holocaust is an affront to common sense and to the memory of all those of perished.

Here is the exchange from today:


Dear Joy,

While I did not receive the below e-mail (it may have gone to one of my old gmail addresses which I am not using), my father did.

I am not sure if “disgust,” “utter shock” or simple “bewilderment” will be the most appropriate manner to describe my father’s (actually my parents’) reaction.

Allow me then to respond based on what I have observed and heard this morning.

Both my parents are Holocaust Survivors.  My father’s mother went out one day to bring food, never to return.  Our good Polish neighbors apparently informed there was a Jew in their midst.  I will not enumerate all the family members who perished during the Holocaust, luckily there were a few, so very few, who survived.

My father and my uncle escaped the Warsaw Ghetto before the Uprising.  We can talk about forced- or other separation of children from their parents.  We can think about more than a million children murdered, and those others who actually survived had their childhood robbed and the rest of their lives affected.  Both my parents are exactly such “Child Survivors” (they were children at the time), and what happened them affects them to this very day; physically and emotionally.

We can talk about a brave teacher, school principal, who would not leave his children and walked with them to the very end, although he was extended the opportunity to save his own life.  Children were shot, butchered, burned, enslaved, put to hard-labor.  That was then; under the Nazi regime and with the active and jubilant participation of the local populations (yes, including the Poles).

To compare anything that is happening today in the USA (or for that matter in Israel or elsewhere) to the Nazi Death Camps (lest the Poles get insulted) does great disservice to the memory of the more than six millions of us - our own family - who were butchered and systematically murdered with the intention of annihilating us all.

How can one in good conscience compare the almost “vacation-style” conditions the children of people trying to illegally enter the country and the treatment they are receiving to, for example, the Warsaw Ghetto?  And remember, this was nothing compared to, for instance, Auschwitz-Birkenau.  Every Shabbat I spend time with Survivors of these camps.  Some will be (and are) still able and willing to share their stories; of what it meant to survive the horrors that were a moment-to-moment, non-stopping, on-going Inferno.

You are correct - the issue is NOT political (Republicans / Democrats, Deplorables / Adorables, those who think the President does a good job and those who give him not an ounce of leeway).  For any one from our family to compare modern day conditions here in the USA and treatment of others - be they illegal immigrants, refugees or detainees - to Nazi Germany and the Concentration Camps of Ghettos is plainly wrong.

This definitely hurt both my parents, for it apparently brought back memories buried so deep; memories that can never be separated from who they are; from who and what we are.

This is personal - deeply so - as it affects OUR family.

Always,

Ari Bussel

On Jun 20, 2018, at 10:30 PM, Joy wrote:

We are usually very careful about the distribution of our political e-mails, realizing that all our  friends and family do not necessarily share our angst about what is happening in the U.S.  However, we are sending this widely, regardless of one's political party affiliation or beliefs.  

Separating children (including babies) from their parents and incarcerating them violates America's values.  This conjures up Nazi concentration camps and Japanese internment camps.  As morally repugnant as the Japanese internment camps were, children were not separated from their parents.  

We MUST do something.  

Many of us have been trying to figure out what to do that can be effective.  Some things are obvious:
  
1. Contact our Congressional and Senatorial representatives
2. Attend town halls
3. VOTE
4. Encourage everyone to vote
5. Attend marches and demonstrations
6. Donate to legal defense funds and other non-profit advocacy organizations
7. Learn how to become a sanctuary home or a temporary foster parent

Re #4:  VOTE:  Shockingly, only 58% of Americans voted in the 2016 election.  We have heard too many people say, "I didn't vote because I didn't care for either candidate."  We all demand and expect our rights.  With rights come responsibilities.  A major responsibility is to VOTE.  We must convince people that even if there is a situation where they do not like either candidate, they need to vote for the "least bad".  We hear a lot about Russia, Comey, etc. affecting the election results.  Those who did not vote actually did make a choice with their inaction.

Re #5:  DEMONSTRATIONS:  Saturday, June 30 at noon there will be hundreds of marches across the U.S. protesting government forced separation of families.   You can click on this site and enter your zip code to find the march closest to you.


Re #6:  DONATE:  We have received lists of organizations that are helping separated migrant families.  We do not have personal knowledge of any of these but looked up each of the organizations listed by Adam Schiff, CNBC, and Daily Kos.  

Of the approximately 30 organizations, only Texas Civil Rights Project is rated by CharityNavigator.org and it receives 4 stars.  (It is also recommended by CNBC and Daily Kos.)  You can look it up either under CharityNavigator.org or their website: texascivilrightsproject.org

RAICES (Refugee and Immigration Center for Education and Legal Services) is listed but not yet rated by Charity Navigator.  It is recommended by CNBC and Adam Schiff and there is a Go Fund Me page that has raised about $15 million.  Their website is: Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, Inc. (San Antonio Central Office) - National Immigration Legal Services Directory - Nonprofit Resource Center

KIND (Kids in Need of Defense) is recommended by Daily Kos and Adam Schiff but I cannot find it on Charity Navigator.  Their mission is to provide legal representation for children.  Their website is: Kids in Need of Defense (Los Angeles Office) - National Immigration Legal Services Directory - Nonprofit Resource Center

Re #7: SANCTUARY HOME OR FOSTER HOME:  We do not know how to go about this but know that many people (including us) would like to offer their homes to help.  If anyone knows how to go about this, please advise.

Sincerely,

Joy and Len
___________________
Isn’t the Key Word ‘ILLEGAL’ in Illegal Immigration?
John R. Houk
© June 22, 2018
___________________
Re: Helping Migrant Families Separated at the Border

© Ari Bussel

Ari Bussel Bio via BeverlyHills.org

Ari Bussel is Vice President of Operations at Saybrex International, a privately held family business specializing in the distribution of fine wines and spirits. He is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the company and has held various positions in the company since 1993.

Prior to joining Saybrex, Mr. Bussel served as First Lieutenant in the Center for Systems Analysis at General Headquarters of the Israel Defense Forces, where he led the implementation of the Logistics War Doctrine in the Computerized Wargame Program.

Mr. Bussel is involved in a variety of philanthropic and civic activities. Mr. Bussel completed the Team Beverly Hills Leadership Program and served on the Environmental Sustainability Topic Committee of the City of Beverly Hills. He was a member of the Steering Committees of former Beverly Hills Mayor MeraLee Goldman and the current Beverly Hills City Treasurer, the Hon. Eliot Finkel. Mr. Bussel also completed and participated in the Community Emergency Response Training Program of the City of Beverly Hills as well as the Crisis Response Team of the Maple Counseling Center.

Mr. Bussel was among the founding members and served on the boards of Gen. Shimon Erem’s Israel Christian Nexus, the Western Region of Friends of Israel Firefighters and the Israel Institute for Alternative Energy Advancement. He completed the Salvin Leadership Program of the Anti-Defamation League.

Mr. Bussel writes regularly. For the past decade, his weekly columns appeared in print in Israel Jewish Life, Shalom LA, Muslim World Today and Israeli Week. Mr. Bussel’s articles appear on numerous websites, including Canada Free Press, Free Republic, NewsBlaze, SlantRight and OpEdNews. He is a member of the Los Angeles Press Club.

Mr. Bussel received a Master of Science in Operations Research from Stanford University and Bachelor’s degrees from UCLA in Applied Mathematics and in Economics with a specialization in Computing.

Mr. Bussel was an avid runner who completed the 2005 and 2006 Los Angeles Marathon.

Mr. Bussel divides his time between Israel and the United States, writing about the social, political, military and foreign policy fabrics of the two countries. Mr. Bussel is a member of the foreign press corps in Israel. Since 2008, Mr. Bussel has cooperated with award winning investigative journalist and author in a series of essays “Postcards from America – Postcards from Israel,” and since 2011 in a series of radio broadcasts “Conversations Eye to Eye.”


Thursday, June 21, 2018

Israel Looks to Self-Preservation


John R. Houk
© June 21, 2018

Yesterday I receive an email from Ari Bussel sharing an Israel GPO News Update about Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses a graduation ceremony of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) officers.


In that address Netanyahu talks about military/terrorist threats from Hamas in Gaza to the south and Iran building threatening military capabilities toward the north in Syria. Here is that relatively short news release from the Israel GPO:

PM Netanyahu Addresses IDF Officers' Course Graduation Ceremony

Communicated by the Prime Minister's Media Adviser
20 June 2018

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, today (Wednesday, 20 June 2018), at IDF Training Base #1, addressed an IDF officers' course graduation ceremony. Following is an excerpt from his remarks:

"I do not intend to go into detail about what we are planning vis-à-vis Gaza. The intensity will be stepped up as necessary. We are prepared for any scenario and our enemies would do well to understand this – now.

Regarding the Syrian front, we are constantly working to prevent Iranian forces and their proxies from establishing a military presence there. We will not allow those who call for our destruction to turn Syria into a base for aggression against Israel.

The iron fist of the IDF is powerfully striking whoever strives to attack us, and will continue to do so."

In America you probably have no clue to what Prime Minister Netanyahu was talking about thanks to the lack of reporting by the Mainstream Media (MSM). OR if they do report, it is some disinformation blaming Israel for violence on the Gaza-Israel border or perhaps an idiotic accusation that Israel is attacking Iranian military assets in Syria especially near Syrian/Israeli border. Even after continued Islamic terrorist attacks by Hamas and affiliates against Israeli civilians originating from Gaza, the UN condemns Israel for reprisals.

Here is an example of Hamas/Islamic Jihad/UN hypocrisy:

Hamas and Islamic Jihad: Israeli Airstrikes Will Be Answered With Rocket Fire





Terrorist factions in the Gaza Strip, including Hamas and the Islamic Jihad warned Wednesday that Israeli airstrikes on the Strip will be met with rocket fire from Gaza.

In a statement released to the media, the factions took responsibility for the barrage of rockets fired at Israel on Tuesday night, which they said was a “response to Israel’s continuous aggression against Gaza,” adding that “the enemy’s leadership will bear full responsibility for its aggression and will pay a price for its arrogance.”

Hamas’ Spokesperson Fawzi Barhoum blamed Israel for the current escalation but also added that Hamas is not interested in war.

“It (Hamas) will always be ready to carry out its national duty of protecting the Palestinian people,” Barhoum said.

Earlier Wednesday, the IAF struck 25 Hamas targets in the Strip in response to ongoing cross-border arson and rocket attacks at civilian communities.

Five missiles hit towns around the Gaza Belt district overnight between Tuesday and Wednesday, with at least 13 rockets landing in the Eshkol Regional Council alone. No injuries were reported, but, several buildings and cars were damaged in the attacks.

“In response to the rockets fired throughout the night from the Gaza Strip at Israel, IAF fighter jets targeted approximately 25 terror objectives in the Gaza Strip thus far,” the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit said in a statement. “The Hamas terror organization targeted Israeli civilians throughout the night with a severe rocket attack and is dragging the Gaza Strip and its civilians down a deteriorating path. Hamas is responsible for everything that transpires in the Gaza Strip and will bear the consequences for deliberately targeting Israeli civilians.”

Pertaining Israel/Syria/Iran, here is an excerpt from Eurasia Review:

Accessing Israel-Iran Simmering Rivalry In Syria – Analysis

June 15, 2018


On the other side of the conflict, Iranians have begun to tamp up the rhetorical escalation that has the potential to put these two countries on a path toward open confrontation. From Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to IRGC generals there have been repetitive threat to wipe out ‘Zionists’ which has become a normal jargon in public forums. Though the rhetoric broadened that they will pursue every move with calculation and caution for two major factors.


This implacable aspiration to wipe out Israel from the map discredits Rouhani government’s claim to not pose any threat to the security and sovereignty of regional countries. In fact, the rift between Rouhani and IRGC widened with the eruption of a heated argument between Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and his Military Commander Mohammad Bagheri over the true intention behind launching retaliatory missiles against Israel. In the argument, Rouhani tried to explain the detrimental effect and international repercussions on the nuclear deal.

As the mutual hostility between Israel-Iran has deepened in Syria, Israel stated that their defence forces were on high-alert due to irregular Iranian activities in Syria and have ordered bomb shelters to be equipped in Golan Heights. Shortly, the Syrian state media reported that the government has downed two Israeli missiles near a military base of the capital. Subsequently, another report of Israel attacking targets of the Syrian military on the outskirts of Quneitra in the Golan Heights reverberated across the region. Prior to a week of frequent Israeli strikes, three unnamed US officials stated that Israel is preparing for military action against Iran in Syria, and is seeking US support. In addition, the officials also blamed Israel for the airstrike on a military base in Hamas and Aleppo that killed over 20 military personnel, including Iranians.

It seems that Israel has been motivated by the desire to fight sooner rather than later. Israel considers that an attack by Iran, while not imminent, is inevitable, and that delay in attacking would involve greater risk. Usually, this happens, when the balance of military capability is expected to shift in the enemy’s favour, due to the prospects that the opponent will acquire or develop a powerful new offensive or defensive capability. …

Israelis firmly believe that Iran as a nuclear emergence state will bring their world to the threshold of the abyss. Probably, this would be the factor for Netanyahu to urge Trump refer to the documents provided by them on the development of Iranian nuclear deal, rather than relying on the reports provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). …

This led Putin to send Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov on an errand to Tehran where he warned Rouhani about the far-reaching consequences of Iranian retribution to an Israeli strike, not least for Russia and Syria. However, before Rouhani could curb IRGC’s manoeuvrability in Syria, IRGC appears to have fallen for Israeli bait and have launched some 20 rockets at their positions in the Golan Heights. This gave Israel a solid ground to retaliate with the largest strike they have carried out in Syria since 1970 while substantiating it as an act of self-defence which is legitimate under international law. The Israeli said, its targets included weapon storage, logistic sites and intelligence centres used by elite Iranian forces in Syria. Additionally, they have also destroyed five Syrian air-defence batteries after coming under heavy fire.


I believe you can see Prime Minister Netanyahu’s remarks to the IDF officers graduating class had to do with Israel’s self-preservation.

JRH 6/21/18

Wednesday, June 20, 2018

MARK MEADOWS DROPS MULTIPLE BOMBSHELLS IN HEARING ABOUT CLINTON, RUSSIA PROBES


Examination of the FBI and DOJ is far from over. Rep. Mark Meadows reveals the FBI 302s from the Crooked Hillary interview were altered in her favor.

********************
MARK MEADOWS DROPS MULTIPLE BOMBSHELLS IN HEARING ABOUT CLINTON, RUSSIA PROBES

By Chuck Ross | Reporter
06/20/18 2:14 AM

Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC)

North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows made two startling claims in a House hearing on Tuesday, asserting that there is “growing evidence” that FBI officials altered documentation of witness interviews in the Hillary Clinton and Russia probes.

The Republican also revealed the name of an FBI attorney he believes is the bureau employee who was removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation in February after he was found to have sent anti-Trump text messages.

Meadows made the revelations in a round of questioning with Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

On Thursday, Horowitz’s office released a scathing report that documented FBI officials’ mishandling of the Clinton investigation. It also laid out a slew of text messages that FBI officials and attorneys sent criticizing Donald Trump.

“I think the other thing that I would ask you to look into, there is growing evidence that 302s were edited and changed,” Meadows said. “Those 302s, it is suggested that they were changed to either prosecute or not prosecute individuals. And that is very troubling.”

Meadows was referring to forms that FBI agents use to summarize witness interviews. He told reporters after Tuesday’s hearing that he has seen evidence that 302s filled out during the Clinton and Russia investigations have been changed. He also said he has “more information” about the alleged alterations. (RELATED: ‘Viva Le Resistance’: Mueller Team Attorney Sent Anti-Trump Texts)

Horowitz appeared to acknowledge that he is aware of allegations about edited 302s.

“If I could just mention, we have been getting those kind of referrals and as often happens when we issue reports like this we get other information coming to us, and we are intending to follow up on that,” Horowitz said.

Meadows was not finished dropping bombshells.

He also threw out the name of the person he believes is identified as “FBI Attorney 2” in the IG report released on Thursday. The report cited text messages that the lawyer sent shortly before and after the 2016 election criticizing Trump.

“I am numb,” the attorney wrote on Election Day.

“Viva le resistance,” he wrote to another FBI attorney on Nov. 22, 2016.

The lawyer worked on both the Clinton and Russia investigations. On the latter, he served as the FBI’s top attorney on the Russia probe as of 2017 and worked on Mueller’s team until February. He was removed from that investigation after the discovery of his anti-Trump texts.

Horowitz said early on in Tuesday’s hearing that the lawyer was not identified in the IG report at the request of the FBI. The bureau claimed that the individual’s identity was sensitive because he worked on counterintelligence matters. (RELATED: FBI Is Refusing To Name Anti-Trump Attorney)

“Is the other one Kevin Clinesmith?” Meadows asked in an attempt to get Horowitz to identify FBI Attorney 2.

Horowitz did not take the bait.

Meadows also asked Horowitz whether an FBI lawyer named Sally Moyer was also referenced in the IG report.

“They don’t work in counterintelligence. If that’s the reason the FBI is giving, they’re giving you false information because they work for the general counsel,” Meadows said.

Mueller’s office and the FBI have refused to identify FBI Attorney 2.

_________________

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

© Copyright 2010 - 2018 | The Daily Caller

About The Daily Caller

Founded in 2010 by Tucker Carlson, a 20-year veteran journalist, and Neil Patel, former chief policy advisor to Vice President Cheney, The Daily Caller is one of America’s largest and fastest-growing news publications. Our team of experienced, full-time reporters and editors works around the clock to deliver award-winning original reporting, in-depth investigations, entertainment, thought-provoking commentary and up-to-the-second breaking news.

From exposing shocking mismanagement of Republican National Committee funds to exclusively revealing the FBI’s interview with Hillary Clinton, The Daily Caller’s reporting has been thorough and tough on members of both political parties. In 2016, The Daily Caller emerged as a news leader in READ THE REST


Tuesday, June 19, 2018

The Video Facebook Doesn't Want You to See


Brigitte Gabriel posted a roughly two-minute video on Facebook sharing statistics on the HUGE amount of taxpayer money spent on illegal immigrants. Facebook removed her video claiming it violated community guidelines. Here is the Gabriel email informing readers of Facebook censorship.

**********************
The Video Facebook Doesn't Want You to See

By Brigitte Gabriel
Sent Jun 19, 2018, 12:45 PM
Sent via ACT for America

Last Thursday I shared a 2 minute video on Facebook with my thoughts on criminal aliens entering this country. I ran through a number of troubling statistics about the financial strain criminal aliens have on our economy as a whole. I also talked about how I felt as a legal immigrant who spent years - and thousands of dollars - immigrating here the right way.

Unfortunately, Friday night Facebook decided my video did not meet their "community standards" and they took my video down right as it was approaching 500,000 views. We have yet to receive a detailed explanation on why my video did not meet their "community standards" but you can view my video on YouTube and decide for yourself by clicking below:


[Posted by ACT for America
Published on Jun 18, 2018

Facebook deleted this video because they claimed it did not meet their "community standards."

Watch ACT for America Founder, Brigitte Gabriel, talk about illegal immigration.


I can assure you of this: Facebook and their politically correct policies will NOT slow me down. I will continue to speak my mind and publish videos on a regular basis. If anything, this blatant form of censorship has inspired me to take my efforts online to the next level. This is why ACT for America is in the process of launching our very own Social Media War Room. This "War Room" will have the staff and technology to rapidly respond to the leftist narratives that are constantly dominating social media - and to effectively navigate every attempt they make to eliminate our freedom of speech.

A perfect example of why this new project is critical is the current immigration issue. Millions of Americans have now been incorrectly led to believe that President Trump is permanently separating children from the families of those who illegally cross our southern border. With a funded and staffed social media war room, we can push back on fake news narratives like this one that has dominated the news cycle for the last week. With your help this project can come to fruition.






Please help us utilize social media to reach millions of Americans every single month. In the era of fake news, we must do everything we can to combat the left's stranglehold on the internet.

Always Devoted,




Brigitte Gabriel
_________________________

ACT for America · 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 190, #614, Washington, DC 20004, United States 

Keep up with Brigitte Gabriel on Twitter or Facebook.

About Brigitte Gabriel

Lady Brigitte Gabriel started ACT for America in an effort to protect the citizens of the United States from the horrors she experienced as a young girl in her native Lebanon. When Ms. Gabriel was 10 years old militant radical Islamists launched rockets into her family’s home in their Christian town in southern Lebanon destroying her home and seriously injuring her as they raged war against the “infidels.” Her family was forced to seek refuge in an underground 8 x 10- foot bomb shelter where they lived for the next seven years. Often surviving on mere weeds, they had to crawl through a ditch to get water from a nearby spring while avoiding Islamic snipers.

After several perilous years, Ms. Gabriel moved to Israel before subsequently becoming a proud citizen of the greatest nation on earth; the United States of America. Today, she is the one of the leading terrorism experts in the world, providing information and analysis on the rise of global Islamic terrorism. She lectures nationally and internationally about terrorism and current affairs.

She has addressed the United Nations, the Australian Prime Minister, members of The British Parliament/House of Commons, Members of the United States Congress, top-ranked Pentagon officials, The Joint Forces Staff College, The US Special Operations Command, The US Asymmetric Warfare group, the FBI, and many others. The top General for the Israel Defense Forces nicknamed Brigitte “The Iron Women”. In addition, she is a regular guest analyst on Fox News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, and various radio stations daily across America. She serves on the board of advisors of the Intelligence Summit.

In addition to serving as the Founder and Chairman of ACT for America, she is a celebrated author of READ THE REST


Monday, June 18, 2018

Americans Need Plain Sight



Justin Smith tackles the glaring absence of substantiated bias against President Trump and FOR Crooked Hillary in Michael Horowitz’s Inspector General Report on FBI/DOJ investigations.

************************
Americans Need Plain Sight

By Justin O. Smith
Sent 6/16/2018 8:37 PM

The FBI brass must have needed hazmat suits to scrub DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on agency misconduct in the 2016 elections, since the evidence of treason at the highest level of government was abundant. The truth is being hidden, and the result is a fiction representative of something out of Orwell's '1984'; and so, we must do everything within our power to force the issue in opposition to status quo voices in government and the media, who are not representing the U.S. Constitution and objectives based on our founding virtues, We must hold these criminals, these traitors, in the FBI, the DOJ and elsewhere within the government,  accountable for illegally working to prevent Donald Trump from winning the election and afterwards trying to unseat him from power. 

The five-hundred page IG Report was released on June 12th 2018, and it  barely scrapes the surface of previous known acts of sedition and espionage, if not treason. It doesn't really address anything that the American people were not already aware had occurred. I made note of the Peter Strzok and Lisa Page texts in January 2018, just as the IG Report recently did.

Page texted Strzok in August 2016 and asked, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?"  "No. No he won't," Strzok responded. Why are these two FBI agents still working for the FBI? This is treason at the FBI and heads must roll.

And yet, in regards to investigative decisions by FBI Deputy Director Assistant Peter Strzok, the lead investigator on the Clinton email case and the Russia investigation, and Lisa Page, Special Counsel to the Deputy Director, Inspector General Michael Horowitz incredibly offers us that there was "no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations".

Among several other important items, the report also gives Hillary Clinton a pass on the mishandling of Top Secret information, even though it's unfathomable that any career government official would not realize that an insecure system was not any place for those conversations. Seven email chains that were classified at the Top Secret/ Special Access Program level went through Clinton's private server in an unsecured manner, and it is now known, that the Russians did, in fact, access them, as reported by Fox News.

This was willful and criminal misconduct by Hillary Clinton, because the gap between unclassified and Top Secret was so wide and obvious. She had to know her actions were criminal and illegal, and there was a purpose and a deception at work here, namely to cover up the illegal actions she and Obama took in Libya and across the Middle East [Blog Editor: Possible reference HERE & HERE].

Horowitz's report split hairs with the definition of "gross negligence" -- concluding that the term encompassed conduct "so gross as to almost suggest deliberate intention" or something that falls just short of being willful."

Horowitz found that Hillary Clinton did not intend to violate the law, much in the disingenuous fashion that former FBI Director James Comey did. Any person capable of reading the law and cogent thought knows that our prisons are full of people whose crimes were not intentional, but they were still prosecuted and imprisoned for breaking the law.

This report has all the appearances of a whitewash and an evasion of the FBI's troubling role in this garbage barge of institutional roguery. Americans remain in the dark, due to questions left unanswered, such as what really transpired between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch during their July 2016 airport tête-à-tête, a few days before Comey let Hillary, a presidential candidate, off the hook on the email server issue? How was it not a conflict of interest for Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe's wife to receive $700,000 for her state legislative race, from Clinton's campaign bag-man, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe? How did the wife of a top FBI agent, Bruce Ohr, get on the payroll of Fusion GPS, the company that brokered the Steele Dossier? And how did the FBI conceal the fact from the judges who ruled on FISA warrants against President Trump and his associates, that the Steele Dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton campaign?

There isn't a hint of any IG Report on other FBI abuse of power. like inserting an actual spy into President Trump's campaign. Neither is there any attention given the FBI concealment of Obama's lie and denial he knew anything about Clinton's secret server.

What alternate universe is Horowitz from and when are some of these criminals and traitors to the United States going to be prosecuted and thrown into the deepest, darkest dungeon, underneath a prison?

U.S. Attorney John Huber has supposedly been investigating several of these crimes since November 2017. His boss, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has informed House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) that such an investigation is within the full scope of Huber's existing mandate. With 470 investigators, Huber has enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel.

Americans need plain sight and new leaders with plain sight, pure and simple, because something evil is coursing through the halls of our government and in the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation these days. Anytime an average citizen can recognize the multiple acts of treason that were committed by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and their minions, through the State Department, the FBI and the Department of Justice, but career federal agents dismiss them as oversights or "unintended", something is terribly wrong, and if the Inspector General's Report is any indication, our Republic is on its last dying legs, unless the patriots of America can right the Republic, peacefully or not. 

Make a public demand for Justice.

By Justin O. Smith
_______________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text embraced by brackets as well as source links  are by the Editor.

© Justin O. Smith

Saturday, June 16, 2018

SPLC Hates Free Speech


The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) [See Also DTN] might as well be the chief propaganda machine for all things Leftist/Marxist in America. Not only does the SPLC target fringe groups (e.g. KKK, Neo-Nazis, Aryans, Christian Identity, etc.), but they seek to smear traditional Christian/American values organizations.

The SPLC has placed many good and non-violent organizations on a hate list being falsely accused of racism and bigotry while giving a pass to Leftist fringe groups. Bill Warner is one of those targeted by the SPLC. The SPLC would label Warner an Islamophobe racist merely because he shares the truth about Islam.

Here, Warner pushes back.

***************************
SPLC Hates Free Speech

Sent by Bill Warner
Email sent 6/15/2018 7:16 AM
Sent via Political Islam

There was a time in America when freedom of speech was considered so basic that it was rarely talked about. Today “civil rights” organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are devoted to silencing the voices who insist on speaking their minds. The SPLC does not recognize honest differences of opinions, but instead, all who do not adhere to its leftist politics are called "racist-hater-bigot-Islamophobe". That's one word, mind you.

The SPLC has found fellow totalitarians in such groups as the Jewish Federation who have turned from tolerance of political differences to attempts to silence dissident voices to Islamic fundamentalists like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).

As a dissident, I say give me your best shot. No amount of name calling can shut me up.

[Email provides link to a Political Islam post with video]
+++++++++++++
Southern Poverty Law Center and the Apologists

Jun 13 2018

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) came to my hometown at the invitation of the Jewish Federation. Now the SPLC is the supreme judge of social morality. The SPLC is the US hate monitor and is the basis for censorship by Twitter, Face Book, Google, and You Tube. I am a racist-hater-bigot- Islamophobe according to the SPLC because I talk about political Islam.

Part of the problem with the SPLC judgment or decree is that there is no due process or redress. There is no way to challenge them. Their purpose is to shame and drive their victims out of business.

The purpose of the SPLC is to censor all those who have different political ideas. They oppose free speech as hate speech. They reject fact based reasoning and critical thought. The Jewish Federation is a partner with these totalitarians. They are joined by the Christians who are apologists for Islam.

The SPLC, the Federation or the other apologists cannot stand a critical view of political Islam. Their only response is that critical thinkers are racist-hater-bigot Islamophobes. Knowledge is bigotry and denial is a virtue.


Posted by Political Islam
Published on Jun 14, 2018

If you like my channel, click the notification bell to see my latest videos. Sign up for Bill Warner's newsletter at www.politicalislam.com. Buy Bill's books at: www.politicalislam.com/shop

Follow Bill Warner:






[Blog Editor: The rest of the Youtube description is the same as the Political Islam post above.]
_________________________
© 2007-2018 CSPI, LLC. all rights reserved.



What is Islam?

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

CSPI

Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) is an educational organization dedicated to enlightening the general public about the doctrine of political Islam based on the works of Dr. Bill Warner.

Our Mission

Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

The Five Principles

Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.

All of Islam is based upon the Trilogy—KoranSira (Mohammed’s biography) and Hadith (his Traditions).

Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.

Islam divides the world into Muslims and unbelievers, kafirs.

Political Islam always has two different ways to treat kafirs—dualistic ethics. Kafirs can be abused in READ THE REST


Friday, June 15, 2018

No Overall Bias?

OIG Pulls a Comey in Horowitz Report

John R. Houk
© June 15, 2018



The Horowitz IG Report on the FBI/DOJ handling of Crooked Hillary’s email server investigation came out June 14. I have no doubt the Leftist MSM will report this underlying theme: Horowitz found no political bias.

I haven’t personally read the 568-page report yet, but a quick read of primarily Conservative sources commenting the report, Michael Horowitz both let’s the FBI off the hook relating bias and singles out bias of certain FBI/DOJ members. How Horowitz can generalize no overall bias and individual bias simultaneously is beyond me. I believe another instalment of Horowitz’s IG investigation is in the future.

Here are some salient observations that Conservative sources are observing:

§  Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch acted improperly in not cutting short a meeting aboard an aircraft with former President Bill Clinton during the investigation of Hillary Clinton. Both Lynch and Bill Clinton denied discussing the ongoing email probe during the meeting.

§  The FBI improperly permitted two Clinton aides who were witnesses in the investigation to sit in on the FBI's questioning of Clinton

§  Comey drafted an initial statement exonerating Clinton months before the investigation ended. FBI agents' actions surrounding the DOJ/FBI interview of Hillary Clinton were 'inappropriate' and created appearance of bias  

§  The draft statement exonerating Clinton also removed the term "gross negligence"—a condition that could have been used for prosecution—and replaced with "especially concerning." - Comey usurped the authority of the attorney general when he announced during a July 2016 press conference that the FBI would not be recommending charges against Clinton, then the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.

§  An initial assessment in the Comey draft statement saying foreign spy services were "reasonably likely" to have accessed the classified data on the Clinton server was replaced with "possible."

§  FBI ethics officials "did not fully appreciate" the potential conflict of interest by former FBI Director Andrew McCabe's wife receiving $675,288 in 2015 from Clinton associate Terry McAuliffe, then-governor of Virginia, for her political campaign for a state senate seat. McCabe became head of the email probe in early 2016.

§  The FBI improperly regarded a parallel investigation of Russian collusion with the Trump presidential campaign in 2016 to be more important the Clinton email probe.

§  New texts between FBI lovers Strzok and Page were 'disappointing' and cast a shadow over the integrity of the entire Clinton email probe - Strzok's and Page's text messages expressing pro-Clinton and anti-Trump views raised questions about whether they allowed their political leanings to interfere with their work. - The senior FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page may have had a "willingness to take official action" to hurt Donald Trump's chances of winning the 2016 election.


§  Five unnamed FBI employees -- including one lawyer who later worked on the Mueller probe -- are under scrutiny for anti-Trump bias

§  President Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Hillary Clinton had direct contact using her clintonemail.com account

§  Despite Clinton connections, former Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik and former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe didn't fully recuse themselves 

§  'Insubordinate' Ex-FBI Director James Comey repeatedly violated policy and inaccurately described the legal situation surrounding Clinton's emails - While Comey's conduct was "insubordinate," his actions and those of others in the FBI were not affected by bias.

§  Comey departed "clearly and dramatically" from FBI and DOJ guidelines while overseeing the Clinton investigation. Comey's decisions "negatively impacted the perception of the FBI" and the DOJ.

§  Comey often used a personal email account to conduct official FBI business. (These observed points are a blended mix from three sources: Fox News, Business Insider and Washington Free Beacon)

These points are hardly exhaustive, but they provide a decent snapshot of political bias even though the Horowitz IG Report erroneously claims no political bias affected the FBI/DOJ investigation of the Crooked Hillary illegal private email server.

I don’t know if you noticed. The Horowitz IG Report sounds an awful lot just Comey going down a list of Crooked Hillary practices that any two-bit lawyer could match to U.S. Statutes violated. Violations that have had criminal prosecutions!

I will cross post some of Conservative sources I felt aligned more with my thoughts, but first here are a few titles that I perused through.

IG report finds Comey 'insubordinate' in Hillary probe; By Art Moore; WND; 6/14/18

'F--- Trump,' candidate's supporters 'retarded'; By ART MOORE; WND; 6/14/18



Senior FBI agent threatened to prevent Trump election in text message; agents took gifts from reporters; By Bill Gertz; Washington Free Beacon; 6/14/18 5:02 pm

*********************
HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Another Lawyer Was Removed From Mueller’s Team This February Over Anti-Trump Text Messages

By Cristina Laila
June 14, 2018

The IG report released Thursday revealed ANOTHER lawyer was removed from Mueller’s team of liberal hacks February of this year after anti-Trump text messages surfaced.

‘Viva Le Resistance,’ said the unidentified Trump-hating (future) Mueller lawyer in a November 2016 text message.

Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller reported:

An FBI attorney who worked on the special counsel’s Russia investigation until earlier this year sent anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, including one exclaiming: “Viva le Resistance.”

The attorney’s comments are revealed in a Justice Department inspector general’s report released on Thursday.

The lawyer is not identified, but he worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and was the FBI’s lead attorney on the investigation into Russian election interference. He was assigned to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation soon after it began in May 2017 and left in late February of this year after some of his private messages were shared with the special counsel.

The unidentified FBI lawyer said he was “numb” just days after Trump was elected to the White House.

Apparently the FBI lawyer became galvanized in his effort to resist Trump, reported Chuck Ross:

“Is it making you rethink your commitment to the Trump administration?” one FBI lawyer wrote on Nov. 22, 2016.

“Hell no. Viva le resistance,” the future Mueller attorney responded.

According to the report, this Trump-hating FBI lawyer claimed in an interview with the Office of Inspector General he didn’t let his political feelings or beliefs impact his work on Hillary’s email investigation or the Russia probe.

RIGHT.

And Horowitz said there was no political bias at the FBI…
+++++++++++++++++++++
CNN: Strzok and Page Didn’t Attack Trump, HE Attacked Them!

Biggest takeaway from IG report: With all odds stacked against him by a crazed, frenzied mainstream/social media, Hollywood/Entertainment, Never Trumpers, backstabbers in his own party, an Obama-weaponized FBI, Trump was elected President

June 15, 2018


“We’ll stop it.”  Three now infamous little words that can never be walked back and ones that prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that the media of the day and a rogue Obama-weaponized FBI were on the same choir page during the 2016 presidential election campaign.

How the mighty are falling like dominoes before the very eyes of the masses—in spite of intense media backup.  The same masses that Hillary Rodham Clinton called “deplorables”  and that some unidentified FBI yob described as “mostly poor and middleclass”  members of society who voted Donald Trump.

“All the people who were initially voting for her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put out,” the employee wrote. “Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS (sic) that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing. They probably didn’t watch the debates, aren’t fully educated on his policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.” (Fox News, June 14. 2018)

All Obama’s voters were ever after, Mr. Yob, were kitchens, welfare for life and Obama phones.

“Despite Strzok’s extremely inappropriate texting — it’s wildly improper for someone in his position to express animus or favoritism toward a particular candidate — the inspector general found no evidence that Strzok acted on his text to Page.” (CNN, JUNE 14, 2018.)

No acting on his text other than turning the political world upside down, inside out and on its head.


[Posted by Fox News
Published on Jun 14, 2018]

The biggest three little words, which came in August 2016 from disgraced FBI agent, Peter Strzok, once deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI, working on both the Trump-Russia probe and the ‘investigation’ into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, were referenced in yesterday’s massively toned down, 500-page IG report, but the biggest laugh comes a day later from Fake News Grand Central CNN:

“The massive report from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz makes clear that while several FBI officials broke with bureau protocol in their handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server during the 2016 campaign, they were not motivated by political bias against Donald Trump.” (CNN)

ONLY “several FBI officials “broke with bureau protocol” in their handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.  And they “WERE NOT” motivated by political bias against Donald Trump.”

Take THAT, President Trump, you paranoid, “not-MY-president, you!
The biggest reaction to the questionable IG report didn’t come from the public, media-teased for weeks before its final inelegant release—but from the media—shown as working for the same goals as Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page.

Unforgettable LOLs for today’s CNN headline: ‘How 7 words in the 500-page IG report give Donald Trump all the ‘deep state’ ammo he wanted’.

Trump had his Deep State ammo from the get-go.  Video proof exists in the hysterics, wailing and weeping of the networks’ talking heads in the wee hours of Nov. 9, 2016.

In their unprofessional, desperate lovers’ texts, Strzok and Page were only putting into words the collective fervent wishes of the mainstream and social media.

Evidence of the ill will the pair bore for Donald Trump:

PAGE: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
STRZOK: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

“Even before the release of these new text messages between Page and Strzok, who were having an extramarital affair during the campaign, Trump has focused on the duo as aligned against him. (CNN)


“SPYGATE is in full force! Is the Mainstream Media interested yet? Big stuff!” (There’s no evidence that Strzok, Page or the broader FBI were spying on Trump’s campaign.)

No, they were only trying to dump it.

And this is richest of all: “Trump has attacked the two since, at least last December, when emails and text between Strzok and Page were released, showing that both were skeptical of Trump. (Strzok was dismissed from the special counsel probe being run by Robert Mueller in summer 2017.)

This meme advances the outrageous lie that Trump was “attacking” Strzok and Page, rather than them attacking him.

Nor was Strzok merely dismissed from the special counsel being run by Robert Mueller in the summer of 2017, he was demoted and will some day be handsomely pensioned off.

Page left the scene returning to the same kind of obscurity she had before becoming FBI agent Strzok’s mistress.

The media will be falling over backwards to keep the masses from thinking about the report’s real biggest takeaway:

The biggest takeaway from the IG report is this: With all odds stacked against him by a crazed and frenzied mainstream/social media, Hollywood/Entertainment Industry, Never Trumpers, backstabbers in his own party and an Obama-weaponized FBI, etc., etc., etc, Donald Trump was handily elected as President of the United States.
+++++++++++++++++
Strassel: ‘Don’t believe anyone who tells you Horowitz didn’t find bias. I can still hear the echoes of the howls…’


June 15, 2018

Wall Street Journal opinion columnist Kimberley Strassel took to Twitter to say what many Americans are thinking about Thursday’s release of the Department of Justice inspector general’s report, that something’s amiss because what’s in the report does not match the summary of the report.

In a series of tweets, Strassel began by noting the careful play on words by inspector general Michael Horowitz when he stressed that they “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed.”

“Don’t believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn’t find bias,” she tweeted. “He very carefully says that he found no ‘documentary’ evidence that bias produced ‘specific investigatory decisions.”


Strassel notes that while no one actually put it in writing that they were politically motivated, Horowitz “in fact finds bias everywhere.”

And that “this same cast of characters who the IG has now found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation” is now to be trusted working the Trump-Russia probe.



She also highlighted “stunning examples of incompetence,” such as former FBI director James Comey explaining that he didn’t grasp the importance of Anthony Weiner’s laptop because he wasn’t aware of Weiner being married to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin.


And people dared to question President Donald Trump’s decision to fire Comey?

One thing is certain, the wording of the report allowed the anti-Trump media to run with headlines screaming that the IG report “found no political bias.”

But there’s a theory on what that was all about, as seen in a tweet from social media account The Last Refuge — that also happens to support the idea that the summary, “written post facto by administrators in FBI/DOJ leadership,” fails to correspond with what’s in the report.

“The ‘executive summary’ was written to protect the institutions and that’s where the media are getting ALL of their headlines,” the tweet reads. “However, the internal body, the investigative report inside, is entirely contradictory to the summary. The facts are DEVASTATING.”

Others commented, saying that Horowitz “pulled his punch just like Comey did with Hillary [Clinton].”

“I see some really damning stuff in this IG report,” tweeted social media user Brian Wilson. “But I’ll just go ahead and say it: The IG pulled his punch just like Comey did with Hillary. I’m stunned by the gathered evidence of bias … and shocked the IG doesn’t think the bias impacted the investigation.”


The liberal media has been quick to dismiss the IG’s findings, but as former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino noted, the report is “devastating.”

“The IG report is only a ‘nothing-burger’ to people who know nothing about the case. It’s a devastating report which will damage Obama, Comey, Hillary, Page, Strzok, and more. Read it and you’ll clearly see the troubling pieces of it,” he tweeted.


_______________________
No Overall Bias?
OIG Pulls a Comey in Horowitz Report

John R. Houk
© June 15, 2018
_____________________
HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Another Lawyer Was Removed From Mueller’s Team This February Over Anti-Trump Text Messages

© 2018 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.
______________________
CNN: Strzok and Page Didn’t Attack Trump, HE Attacked Them!

Content is Copyright 1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com 
_________________________
Strassel: ‘Don’t believe anyone who tells you Horowitz didn’t find bias. I can still hear the echoes of the howls…’

Copyright © 2018. All Rights Reserved. BizPacReview