Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
May 6, 2024
Dr. Robert Malone (self-described inventor of mRNA tech –
OF INTEREST: HERE,
HERE,
HERE
& HERE)
is a person that evokes love, hate and a little of in between the love-hate
emotion stretching across both sides of the political spectrum.
Leftist-Globalists (science & Mockingbird Media) outright vilify him.
A large element of the Right honor his academic-science pedigree yet there are
a significant amount of Anti-Medical Tyranny advocates (I won’t go into the who,
what & why) who have disagreements with Dr. Malone. Those disagreements
have led to mutual civil lawsuits between people who should otherwise be allies
against the Globalist agenda.
.jpg)
Dr. Robert Malone (Daily Wire Photo 2/1/22)
On a personal level, as far the Anti-Medical Tyranny
advocates go. Rather than focus on their disagreements, I focus on their
agreements. Even if hubris among these science Anti-Medical Tyranny fellows
prevents openly congratulating each other’s agreements, it is there and is huge
AGAINST Medical Tyrants.
AND SO, I’m going to share a Dr. Robert Malone Substack post
which I encourage to read with some critical thinking discernment. Why? Because
quite possibly you will not concur with all of Dr. Malone’s assessment.
NEVERTHELESS, it is my opinion Dr. Malone’s assessments in the post should be
eye-opening of the-how threatens an individual’s personal Liberty.
The title: ‘Fascism,
Globalism, and the “Medical-Industrial Complex”: Fight for life,
freedom, and sovereignty.’
The three assessments addressed in the title:
1. The Medical Industrial
Complex
2. Censorship,
propaganda, and psychological warfare technology
3. Globalization versus
nationalism, and a battle worth fighting
JRH 5/6/24
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED.
PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements income by selling
healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of-individual, buy some healthy, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/
**************************
Fascism, Globalism, and the “Medical-Industrial Complex”
Fight for life, freedom, and sovereignty.
May 4, 2024
Who
is Robert Malone [Substack]
Today, I’m delving into three important topics, covered from
a Christian conservative/free market and nationalist perspective. I will place
each within a global geopolitical framework.
My goal over the past four years of the COVID crisis has
been to decipher our collective experiences. This has guided me to focus on the
broader, more comprehensive picture.
Throughout this past year, I have actively participated in
three ‘Global Crisis Summits’ (Brussels at the EU Parliament, Romania,
and Washington DC in conjunction with CPAC), among numerous others. Just
three days ago, I returned from Romania, where I had the privilege of speaking
at the ‘Make Europe Great Again’ conference. These experiences have
underscored the fact that our understanding of the COVID crisis is most
effective when viewed within a broader global context.
Today, I will dig into three fundamental topics that have
been at the forefront of what has happened over the past few years.
1) Medical Industrial Complex
2) Censorship, propaganda, and
psychological warfare technology
3) Globalization versus nationalism, and a
battle worth fighting
1. The Medical Industrial Complex
We need to start with the meaning of words.
“Medical Industrial Complex” refers to the increasingly
powerful, transnational, public-private partnerships linking academia,
pharma/biotech and both national government and supra-governmental
organizations such as the United Nations and its Agenda 2030 treaty, the World
Health Organization and its International Health Regulations, and the World
Economic Foundation among others.
These types of public-private cooperative relationships have
a name. That name was created by Benito Mussolini. We know this name. The name
is Fascism (corporatism). That is the union of the state and corporate power.
We should call it what it is.
One of the things that has happened throughout the COVID
crisis and the ongoing process of globalization and harmonization is the
weaponization and perversion of language.
We have to call things by their true names despite what that
may imply or how the press may react to it. For example, we are not far-right.
We are center-right. The truth is that our opponents have become far-left. We
have allowed the press and corporate media to redefine language and demonize us
as far-right, but the truth is that they are the radicals. They are the
far-left. We have to refuse to allow them to capture and pervert our language.
We must take it back.
Language controls thought. It controls how we structure our
understanding of the world.
Pharma and biotech are major global economic engines, and
the profit and power of this sector have allowed managerial leaders in this
sector to become more powerful than individual nation-states through
corruption, electoral interference, and economic hegemony. The
COVIDcrisis provides abundant examples to illustrate this. Weaponized
fear of a modestly pathogenic respiratory virus has enabled the sector to
extract concessions and wealth from both national and supernational (EU)
organizations. At this point, there does not appear to be any
organization that can hold these “public-private partnerships” accountable for
their actions and misdeeds.
Pharma and biotech were once major economic engines for the
US and European economies. They are no longer. Overall, these sectors are now
increasingly dominated by US and EU competitors, in particular our unrestricted
warfare competitor, the Chinese Communist Party, and our geopolitical frenemy,
India.
To the extent that drugs and biologics are manufactured in
the USA, they are made using precursor compounds that are also manufactured by
CCP and Indian-controlled companies. If the USA and NATO find themselves in a
major “hot” conflict with these offshore competitors, we will find ourselves
without access to essential medicines within weeks due to supply chain
restrictions.
Much of the current drug supply is manufactured offshore in
facilities that are essentially self-monitored, as the FDA has chosen to rely
on local inspection and monitoring. The FDA assumes that these quality control
processes are being performed according to US regulatory standards. To
the extent that independent monitoring of imported drug and biological products
has been performed, the data indicate that FDA “trust” in this offshore quality
control monitoring is misplaced.
Exhibit 1:
The FDA conducted no inspections in China or India between April 2020 and March
2021.
Exhibit 2 shows
that FDA inspector days for the Chinese region were less than ten days per
year.
Chinese pharmaceutical imports in 2022 were around $196
billion, the second-largest U.S. goods import, just behind the automotive
industry.
The US Federal response to this threat has not been to
create policies favoring repatriation of these industries to the US and its
allies, but rather to fund a Virginia facility to stockpile precursor
compounds. But Congress has not followed through on even this modest
program, and although the facility has been obtained, the purchase of the
stockpile has not been funded.
Meanwhile, the integrity, transparency, consistency and
reliability of the FDA has been compromised. A massive wave of
retirements and resignations has resulted in the agency being transformed from
within, due to loss of both expertise and the rise of a politicized culture
largely staffed by non-US trained personnel. Today’s FDA is one in which
regulatory decisions have become unpredictable, arbitrary, and capricious, as
well as decoupled from previously accepted international norms. The revolving
door between FDA retirees and big pharma gets ever larger.
The corruption of the FDA is now recognized worldwide, and
this has eliminated a key US competitive advantage. Previously the FDA
was seen as the global “gold standard” neutral guarantor of biopharmaceutical
product purity and quality. Now the FDA acts to choose winners and losers
in the global competition to innovate in order to address unmet human health
needs (and to generate profit and industrial growth by doing so).
The loss of FDA integrity has destroyed the logic that
purchasing and importing US biopharmaceutical products merits higher costs to
ensure higher quality. Politicized governmental actions have economic
consequences.
2. Censorship, propaganda, and
psychological warfare technology
Social media developed by the US intelligence and enhanced
by the UK intellectual community has been developed as a weapon. Make no
mistake about it, social media as we know it; Facebook, Twitter- as it was
formerly embodied, all of these social media tools are weapons. They are
psychological warfare weapons. They were designed as weapons.
They were designed and deployed in Arab Spring as political
psywar weapons in order to facilitate regime change. This strategy is
considered a huge success by US intelligence. Then the shock came when Nigel
Farage and his UK Independence Party used social media to achieve Brexit. This
was done in large part via decentralized social media communication, and that
shock was further enhanced when Mr. Trump became President Trump.
Suddenly, the United States intelligence community, the State Department, and
all the infrastructure that they control and use to exert control all over the
world woke up and recognized that they had a problem. And that problem now
extends to the populist movement here and across the world, a populism which we
represent as center-right conservatives.
That challenge now represents an existential threat to NATO
itself, because if Europe wakes up to the techno-totalitarianism that is being
imposed from the central bureaucracy in Brussels (that is, the European Union),
and it begins to exert the value of the independent nation-state, there is a
perceived risk by the US State Department and intelligence community that the
European Union, that structure that has been created to hold a Europe together
will dissolve. It will fragment, and if that fragments, NATO will fragment, and
if NATO fragments, then the United States Foreign Policy Establishment believes
that they will find themselves at significant military and geopolitical
disadvantage in an increasingly multilateral world.
This is resulting in a response from the US Intelligence
Community and State Department, in which they feel justified to employ
virtually any non-kinetic method in order to enforce and maintain the current
status quo. Recognize that this is the case. To be clear, I'm not advocating
for the dissolution of the European Union or the dissolution of NATO. I am
reporting to you that this is the perception of the American and the five Eyes
intelligence community, and they will do anything to avoid this consequence.
They feel justified by the utilitarian logic that “anything goes, the ends
justify means”, in order to defend the current world order and the plans for
the future that they have developed.
As a consequence, psychological warfare technology is being
widely deployed by “democratic” governments. This is technology that was
developed for offshore combat. NATO considers this to be a central tenet of its
current warfare planning. NATO calls psychological warfare technology a key
aspect of modern hybrid warfare. This advanced technology is being deployed by
governments and globalists on common citizens now because of the existential
threat to the dissolution of the European Union, the perceived existential
threat to NATO, and the need to maintain consensus by controlling all
information in an increasingly multilateral world. This is being accomplished
through propaganda techniques (such as the IC denial that Hunter Biden’s laptop
was real in 2019), neuro-linguistic programming, and nudging, as well as
censorship and the manipulation of internet algorithms of search engines.
In other words, in response to the threat of China, Russia,
the rise of the Middle East, the fall of the petro-dollar, there is a widely
accepted belief among the western “democracies” that it is necessary and
acceptable to deploy psychological warfare technology on their citizens.
I argue this is fundamentally unethical. Psychological
warfare technology, as it is currently being deployed and has been developed,
can completely control all aspects of information that you receive, what you
think, what you feel, and what you hear.
In a world in which governments feel it is acceptable to
deploy psychological warfare technology on their citizens, the concept of
individual and national sovereignty becomes completely obsolete. We can argue
about whether or not “in-person voting” or “remote ballots” or “long periods
for voting” is enabling for voter fraud. But all of this is completely
irrelevant in the face of modern psychological warfare. When this psywar
technology is deployed on citizens by their government, when everything that
they hear, feel, think, believe, is controlled through this tech, through
social media, through established media, through all messaging- then the nuance
of voting is completely irrelevant.
Again, this is unethical and a breach of human rights.
Humans have the right to access information in a democracy, which is
fundamental to the social contract. How can we have a social contract when the
citizens of nation-states are not allowed the information to make informed
decisions? That's where we're at right now, and it's justified because of the
fear of this existential crisis.
This is evil as far as I'm concerned. This is a major breach
of human ethics. We're disrespecting the ability of individuals to act as
sovereign beings.
Most importantly, the deployment of propaganda and
censorship blocks innovation and adaptation to change. Cultures cannot adapt;
they cannot innovate if they don't have access to full, diverse, accurate
information. This is the most important thing of all. We will become stagnant.
Do we have examples of this type of stagnation? What happens when information
is completely controlled? The former Soviet Union knows the answer. Those who
lived under Ceausescu in Romania know the answer. Those who lived under Salazar
in Portugal know the answer.
3. Globalization versus
nationalism, and a battle worth fighting
There are many lessons that we can learn from the COVID
crisis, but one of the key ones has to do with “what is globalism”. We toss
this term around, we never seem to define it. It's as if it's amorphous beast.
We can't put our hands around it.
Globalism is central planning.
Centrally Planned Economy – Investopedia
We have seen the effects of central planning during the
COVID crisis. The former residents of the Soviet Union understand central
planning. We understand the harm that comes from central planning, from
bureaucrats determining our future, making decisions about how a nation state,
an economy of people, should adapt to changing conditions. During COVID
we have seen how easily centralized planning can be corrupted and perverted to
support a wide variety of hidden agendas.
Central planning is also associated with cultural
homogenization, the drive to create one culture, which is basically driven in
the current case by intentional destruction of diversity to reduce economic
friction.
This globalization thrust is basically justified by large
economic forces in order to support the agenda of transnational, globalist
organizations, particularly corporations in their cooperative relationships
with large transnational governmental organizations. Recently, Blackrock
CEO Larry Fink spoke the quiet part out loud, when he discussed the need to
reduce the global human population and substitute robotic workers to produce
goods and services. This is all perversely driven by a model for future
society collectively referred to as transhumanism.
This is anti-human. This is a death cult, aligned with
a wide range of promoted anti-human policies including abortion, destruction of
religion and family values, and of course the abomination of gender
reassignment surgery and transgenderism.
These policies are being actively and globally promoted
using censorship, propaganda, and modern psywar methods.
We must have access to unrestricted information, which means
free speech and freedom of thought. Now, that comes at a price—a price of
personal responsibility, a price that people will be potentially exposed to
information that may be damaging or offensive. But if we refuse to allow them
to have access to information and diversity of thought, we will prevent our
ability as nation-states and cultures to adapt to changing conditions.
And if there's one thing that we absolutely must have right
now, it's the ability to innovate and adapt. That's how we escape the
Malthusian trap. All this fear of global warming and population growth; that's
what this is all about. And the counter argument to the Malthusian argument is
that humans adapt. Humans can change, humans can innovate. But they can't
innovate if all information is controlled.
States and cultures which resist propaganda, censorship, and
weaponized fear have a competitive advantage. In a multilateral world, Romania
should not apologize for advocating for autonomy. Independent European
nation-states should not apologize for going their own way and innovating. They
must do so. They must do so because it will give them a competitive advantage.
I argue that independent nation-states are the laboratory
for innovation, cultural innovation, political innovation, and economic
innovation. They must be allowed sovereignty and autonomy. If they don't, the
world's ability to adapt to change will be stifled.
The best way to allow the world to adapt to change is by
respecting the principle of subsidiarity. This is the concept that
decision-making authority should be delegated to the smallest, most local
competent level. The principle of subsidiarity demands
decentralization. The ultimate component of a decentralized adaptive world is
not the nation-state, it is the family. We need to celebrate the family as the
core of the principle and thrust of the concept of subsidiarity.
The weaponization of fear via propaganda to control
people is unethical. We have seen repeated justification by academics and
bureaucrats and governments and transnational organizations - that the
weaponization of fear is acceptable in the service of the overall public good
as they define it. We have seen this in the case of the COVID crisis in the
service of public health. The weaponization of fear by governments to control
people is unethical, and it should not be allowed under any circumstances. It
should not be tolerated. We must call it out when we see it.
Last point: We have a difficult fight ahead of us. This
difficult fight is not going to be resolved with one election, the election of
one politician, or a change in leadership at the European Council or the
President of the United States. These issues have been developing for decades,
in many cases for at least a century, and they are not going to be resolved in
the short term.
We have a long-term fight in front of us, which will require
years of effort in fighting this fight.
Do not self-victimize, and don't complain. Again and again,
I hear this cry of
§ “poor
me”.
§ “It's
such a hard job we face”.
§ “There's
so many obstacles”.
§ “Our
opponents are so entrenched, they're so powerful”.
§ “They
have so many forces”.
§ “They
control the media”.
§ “They
are so mean”.
§
“They are so unethical”.
Stop whining. We have a fight. We have to fight that fight,
and it does no good to complain.
It's a wonderful thing. What a wonderful thing to have a
worthy opponent.
It is the greatest gift in the world, and by God, we have a
worthy opponent. We must not complain. We must not shirk. We must confront the
evil that is ahead of us, and it is not going to be easy.
Fight for your future and that of your children. Celebrate
this opportunity to fight for your future. What a gift to have an opportunity
at this point in time to make a difference. Celebrate it.
Refuse to be a victim. Choose life, not death. Do not
apologize, and fight for life, freedom, and sovereignty.
Thank you for reading Who is Robert Malone. This post
is public so feel free to share it.
© 2024 Robert
W Malone, MD
Who is Robert
Malone HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT
Who is Robert Malone
No comments:
Post a Comment