I finally remembered to share this Telegram post I placed in
my Saved File section from May 28, 2023. (For Telegram users, my Telegram
Channel: SlantRight 2.0)
It includes a 2:41-Minute video excerpt of Dr. Peter McCullough listing the
FOUR COVID CRIMINALS (he is a bit more diplomatic in saying “Coconspirators”)
that unleashed an infectious disease (trying to avoid the ire of the
stalwart “there is no such thing as a virus” crowd) on planet Earth.
The THING the critical thinker should wonder about:
oIF there are COVID CRIMINALS, what was
the PURPOSE of manufacturing a deadly infectious disease?
oIF there are COVID CRIMINALS, why was CCP-controlled
China chosen as the place of Disease manufacturing?
oIF there are COVID CRIMINALS, why were
inexpensive and effectual COVID remedies vilified and prevented to the most
vulnerable (the aged and comorbidity individuals) whose lives
could have been saved.
oIF there are COVID CRIMINALS, WHY DID THE
CRIMINALS – then and now – insist and sadly MANDATE what history is demonstrating
the most of harmful EXPERIMENTAL inoculations (mRNA Jab) (propagandized
as a vaccine) in the history of so-called medical vaccinations?
It is my critical thinking conclusion (call it speculative
guessing if you want, but I don’t believe so) the answer is very close to
Elitist social-control of the Masses AND a culling (as in DEPOPULATING)
the Elitist-considered useless humans (ALERT! American Baby-Boomers!).
Below is the TelegramCOVID-19 Up post from 5/28/24 that inspired my
critical thinking which includes the video I uploaded to my Bitchute Channel.
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR
generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements income by selling
healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of-individual, buy some healthy, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/
§“Fauci was in on it the entire time. He was
pretending like he was responding to something that was brand new, but he knew
the entire time. In fact, he was part of a conspiracy to cover up where the
virus came from.”
2.) Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor of Epidemiology and
researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
§“He’s the one who engineered taking part of a
bat coronavirus onto a human coronavirus and making it invade and be lethal.”
3.) Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth
Alliance.
§“He carried the plans from Baric over to China.”
4.) Dr. Shi Zhengli, Senior scientist and researcher
at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. “The bat lady.”
§“She went into the bat caves and handled the
bats and harvested the virus, and they published papers.”
Dr. McCullough ended on this note:
“They telegraphed it. They said,
‘It [COVID] is ready to go.’ That’s what these papers say, ‘It’s ready to go.
We’ve got it. We created the virus.’ They announced it in broad daylight.”
I’m sharing two relatively short videos and a lengthy yet
must read post by Jesse Smith from Truth
Unmuted.
The two short videos focus on Globalist Elitists exacting an
agenda on the USA (alarmingly successful yet reversible by awakened
American Patriots) to eradicate America’s heritage of Faith, Liberty, Entrepreneurial
Spirit and Independent Thinking.
VIDEO #1: The Bitchute Channel Americans United
Against The New World Order shares a Greg Reese video (The Reese
Report is on many video & Social platforms) entitled, “100 YEARS OF CONSPIRACY TO
DESTROY AMERICAN FREEDOM”. Reese briefly – with snapshot
documentation – implicates Rockefellers, Banksters,
the CFR Cabal, American Intel, WEF-Transformists (Names-Named), ONE-Worlders
and Etc..
THEN LAST the Truth Unmuted post entitled, “Cognitive
Warfare and the Tyranny of Digital Transformation”. After
watching the two short videos, the Jesse Smith post for me kind of connected
the dots on the ONE-Worlders agenda of Elitist Global domination with the rendering
of all PEOPLE as useful drones or eliminated rebels. Smith uses photos and
videos to accentuate his point. The post is long but worth reading even if you
have to go back of times to finish.
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR
generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements income by selling
healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of-individual, buy some healthy, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/
Please help us financially by clicking the link https://cash.app/$AmericansUnited
We need your financial support. Your donations serve to aid our mission to
educate and inform. Without funding this service will have to come to end so
that we can earn much needed funding elsewhere. You can prevent that by
graciously donating in any amount via Cash App and using our cashtag,
$AmericansUnited. Any and all donations are greatly appreciated as they help us
to continue bringing you informative content.
A centuries-old plan to control humanity on a micro-level is
being enforced through the construction of a new bio-digital prison system.
Relegated to mere conspiracy theory by legacy media and vehemently denied by
accused conspirators, the plan continues unabated with only pockets of
resistance — nowhere near enough to bring the house of cards down.
The plan has been identified by many throughout the decades.
It is both simple and complex; subtle yet overt; ancient yet contemporary; and
alluring yet appalling. Under the guise of safety, convenience, and inclusion,
humanity is being primed to accept complete and total surveillance as a
condition of simple existence in a “brave new world.” That’s the plan in a
nutshell. What follows are the gory details.
The Era of Cognitive Warfare
To accelerate the paradigm shift toward total surveillance,
cognitive warfare (CW) – a significant upgrade over mere psyops of the past –
has been declared on the global population. The purpose of this war is to
modify human thought, belief, behavior, and identity. According to a 2021 NATO report, cognitive warfare is defined as
(emphasis added throughout):
“a combined arms approach that
integrates the non-kinetic warfare capabilities of cyber, information,
psychological and social engineering in order to win without physical fighting.
It is a new type of warfare defined as the weaponization of public
opinion by external entities. This is carried out for the purpose of
influencing and/or destabilizing a nation.”
A separate NATO report from 2022 adds that cognitive
warfare is:
“…the most advanced form
of human mental manipulation, to date, permitting influence
over individual or collective behavior, with the goal of obtaining
a tactical or strategic advantage. …the human brain becomes the
battlefield. The pursued objective is to influence not only what
the targets think, but also the way they think and,
ultimately, the way they act.”
The U.S. Naval Institute has also recognized the
need for a cognitive warfare strategy, stating:
“…An individual’s cognition is
now a target. Advances in cognitive psychology and information communication
technology (ICT) enable actors to target individuals’ situational
comprehension and will with precision. In light of these changes, cognitive
warfare (CW) has emerged as a new war-fighting concept…
Cognitive warfare operations
will take on many forms and unfold along varying timelines. Some may focus on
reinforcing groups’ or individuals’ existing ideals, while others may
seek to disrupt cohesion or accepted beliefs. The U.S. approach to
CW, however, must uphold U.S. values.”
Adding that technologies like machine learning and
brain-computer interfaces (BCI) boost the efficiency of cognitive warfare, the
Geneva Center for Security Policy (GCSP), a frequent NATO collaborator, further opined that:
“Current and future developments
in artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive sciences, neurotechnologies, and
other related fields will further increase the risks of mass
manipulation and lead to the possibility of the militarization
of the mind as the battlefield of the future… The resulting
environment is one of “permanent latent struggles” rather than a clearly
delineated state of peace and war. This state has been referred to as “new
generational warfare”, “unpeace” or conflict in the “noosphere”.
To summarize what cognitive warfare entails, I offer the
following definition:
“the weaponization of public
opinion, manipulation and militarization of the human mind, and engineering of
individual and collective behavior resulting in permanent new generation
warfare, “unpeace,” and conflict in the “noosphere.”
Wait, what on earth is the noosphere? Unfamiliar to most,
the noosphere is a concept advanced largely by
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a 20th century Jesuit priest who
fused together elements of biblical doctrine, evolution, and mysticism.
Teilhard conceived the noosphere as a realm where human minds interacted
through increasingly complex social networks. He theorized that the evolving noosphere
would eventually reach an “Omega Point,” where
the total convergence of collective human consciousness would unify with the
“Cosmic Christ.” These teachings were deemed heretical by the Catholic church
and Teilhard was publicly denounced. However, his posthumous writings have
influenced scores of scientists, futurists, environmentalists,
globalists, occultists,
new agers, and ironically many Catholics.
One of Teilhard’s most revealing statements undergirding his
philosophy is found in his book Christianity and Evolution, where
he wrote: “What I am proposing to do is to narrow that gap between
pantheism and Christianity by bringing out what one might call the Christian
soul of Pantheism or the pantheist aspect of Christianity.” (p. 56)
It is Teilhard’s pantheistic views that endear him to the
scientific and Big Tech communities. They took up the mantle of advancing the
noosphere through technologies like the Internet and social media, hoping
humanity would realize Teilhard’s vision. It is this writer’s contention
that the supreme goal of CW and the digital revolution is to turn
Teilhard’s Omega Point from theory into reality.
Creating a Collective Human Consciousness
“The noosphere’s evolution
involved the scale of human groups as well as the nature of the information
networks that connected humans and technologies of all sorts… With each new
information technology, the shared knowledge contained in the collective consciousness
of the Noosphere grew, and the rate of its growth accelerated.” [source]
NATO’s 2021 report indicated that neuroscientific warfare
techniques can be used to destabilize “a political leader, a military
commander, an entire staff, a population, or an Alliance…” As a
result, governments and militaries from many nations are working feverishly to
combat the threat mind wars pose to citizens and nations. Their alleged goals
are to maintain trust in democratic values and processes while simultaneously
implementing greater controls on the flow of information. Paradoxically, they
are attempting to maintain (the illusion of) freedom, while authorizing new
forms of digitized censorship “for the greater good.”
What is really taking place is a game of bait and switch
where citizens are told that due to the proliferation of misinformation,
disinformation, hate speech, identity theft, deep fakes, and cyber-attacks,
greater control is needed to police the digital public square. Add in the
so-called threat of climate
change, financial collapse, war, the energy crisis, future
pandemics, and you have what the United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) deem a
“polycrisis.” Tools such as artificial intelligence (AI), Central Bank Digital
Currency (CBDC), biometric surveillance, and digital ID, have emerged as the
“solutions” to these problems.
Whether the evolving bio-digital surveillance paradigm is
called the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), Great Reset, Agenda 2030, or
Humanity 2.0, what’s common is the belief that bigger and better tech can
transform society “for good” and combat issues of mistrust, corruption, crime,
and planetary destruction. However, realizing this utopian vision requires
greater levels of transparency, control, conformity, and collective thought. To
successfully manipulate the public into either full acceptance or forced
submission of this paradigm, the twin brothers of tyranny – surveillance and
censorship – have been invoked.
Klaus Schwab, former Executive Chairman of the WEF, spoke
about this new world where privacy is “severely restricted” in a 2013 interview, mentioning:
“Everything is transparent,
whether we like it or not. This is unstoppable. If we behave acceptably, and
have nothing to hide, it won’t be a problem. The only question is, who
determines what is acceptable.”
In a 2016 interview with Radio Television Suisse,
Schwab elaborated further on transparency, stating, “In the new world, you have
to accept total transparency. It will become part of your personality…
Everything will be transparent. If you have nothing to hide you have no reason
to be afraid.”
Klaus Schwab:
“In the new world, you have to accept total transparency. It will become part of your personality”
“Everything will be transparent. If you have nothing to hide you have no reason to be afraid.”
It’s easy to highlight statements from Schwab given his
notoriety as a globalist boogeyman. Perhaps this is one of the reasons for
his recent withdrawal as the WEF’s front man?
Regardless, Schwab is just one of many who champion surveillance technologies
to complete the transition to the new world order of total transparency.
In iHuman,
a documentary on AI, data scientist and Stanford Professor Michal Kosinski
echoes Schwab’s convictions regarding the current state of privacy, declaring:
“Of course people should have
rights to their privacy when it comes to sexual orientation or political views.
But I’m also afraid that in our current technological environment this is
essentially impossible. People should realize there is no going back, there’s
no running away from the algorithms. The sooner we accept the inevitable and
inconvenient truth that privacy is gone, the sooner we can start actually
thinking about how to make sure our societies are ready for the post-privacy
age.” (emphasis added)
Once an imagined dystopia but now quickly becoming reality,
omnipresent bio-digital surveillance creates an inescapable societal
panopticon. The “new world” Schwab refers to is being steered by the
technocratic elite running all governments, corporations, NGOs, universities,
medicine, and media.
Publicly, the surveillance society is sold as a way to bring
order to a chaotic world splintered politically, racially, economically,
socially, and ideologically. Privately, it is recognized as an iterative way to
forge collective human consciousness as we march toward the transhumanist
vision of “Singularity,” or as Teilhard would claim, the “Omega Point.”
As this push accelerates, companies like Palantir, Amazon,
and Clearview AI along with Big Brother government agencies like NSA, DHS, CIA,
and the FBI continue to amass enormous amounts of data containing essentially
all activity occurring in the digital space.
Smart technology and the Internet of Things (IoT) bring the
all-seeing eye of technocratic overlords into the private spaces of a growing
number of residences and businesses. Backdoors in software and cyber-crime
offer access to huge amounts of data believed to be private and protected, but
often sold to the highest bidder. Microsoft is upping the ante on personal
surveillance. With its new AI-assisted Windows Recall feature that takes screenshots
of everything you do on your computer, the PC transforms into an open book
recalling your entire life. Could a backdoor allow for the AI algorithm to
transmit all private data back to Microsoft and its spook agency partners in real time?
Satya Nadella says Windows PCs will have a photographic memory feature called Recall that will remember and understand everything you do on your computer by taking constant screenshots pic.twitter.com/Gubi4DGHcs
As I’ve written previously, Internet of Bodies devices
exist to monitor and transmit all personal data to the Internet. This industry
is now broadening to include an Internet
of Brains, where “human brains connect to the Internet to
facilitate direct brain-to-brain communication and enable access to online data
networks.” The military-intelligence complex has been conducting experiments on
the human brain for a long time. The CIA’s MK-Ultra and
the White House’s Brain
Initiative are just two examples revealing the government’s
longing to hack the brain and create a hivemind society where thoughts and
actions can be directly controlled through technology and/or mind-altering
substances.
The company behind both reports connecting bodies and brains
to the Internet is the RAND Corporation. RAND’s first president, H. Rowan
Gaither, declared his goal to be “a society where technocrats ruled using
objective analysis.” Author Alex Abella, who wrote the definitive book on RAND, expounded on their technocratic
goals, saying:
“RAND’s ultimate goal was to
have technocrats running every aspect of society in pursuit of a one world
government that would be administered under “the rule of reason,” a ruthless
world where efficiency was king and men were little more than machines,
which is why RAND studied the social sciences because they were at a loss to
work out how to deal with people and how human beings did not always act in
their own predictable self-interests.”
RAND has certainly done its part in forging collective
consciousness and building the technocratic new world order. Its website openly
boasts that “satellites, systems analysis, computing, the
Internet – almost all the defining features of the Information Age were shaped
in part at RAND.”
AI, Biometrics and Digital ID – Tools of Freedom or
Tyranny?
“I’ve often said that digital
inclusion is extremely important. I think the 21st century’s infrastructure is
mobility, broader than cloud. I don’t think it should matter where you are
born, where you come from or who you are. You should be part of our society,
and to be part of our society, you actually need to be digitally included.”
– Hans Vestberg, Chief Executive Officer of
Verizon
In the papers quoted previously on cognitive warfare,
malicious manipulation of digital technology is viewed as a heinous crime that
must be stopped at all costs. However, it can be argued that cognitive warfare
has been perpetuated against the entire world population through the
process of digitization itself.
The Digital Revolution (aka the Information Age or Third
Industrial Revolution) transitioned the world from analog and mechanical
devices to the digital technology of today. This Third Industrial Revolution is
now giving way to the 4IR, where the ultimate goal is to merge man with
machines. This futurist archetype denigrates humanity to mere bits of data –
ripe for control and manipulation by the data owners.
Humans once widely considered God’s crowning achievement –
reflecting the very image of the Creator of all things – are now being
transitioned through self-directed evolution to forge a new identity by
becoming one with technology. Venture into any public space and it’s likely
you’ll see most people transfixed by their smartphones, oblivious to real
humans nearby. But this revolution, largely mainstreamed by Steve Jobs and
Apple, was just the beginning. The complete transition requires the unholy
trinity of AI, biometrics, and digital ID, to serve as a temporary global brain
until humanity reaches the imagined transcendence where godhood itself is
achieved. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
AI is simultaneously being heralded as the greatest human
achievement ever and excoriated as the greatest threat to human survival.
Filmmaker Tonje Hessen Schei unveiled both perspectives in her
documentary iHuman. Two of the most eye-opening statements
occur within the film’s first ten minutes.
“We are made of data. Every one
of us is made of data – in terms of how we behave, how we talk, how we love,
what we do every day. So, computer scientists are developing deep learning
algorithms that can learn to identify, classify, and predict patterns within
massive amounts of data. We are facing a form of precision surveillance, you
could call it algorithmic surveillance, and it means that you cannot go
unrecognized. You are always under the watch of algorithms.” – Eleonore Pauwels, United Nations University
“Almost all the AI development
on the planet today is done by a handful of big technology companies or by a
few large governments. If we look at what AI is mostly being develop for, I
would say it’s killing, spying, and brainwashing… We have military AI, we have
a whole surveillance apparatus being built using AI by major governments, and
we have an advertising industry which is oriented toward recognizing what ads
to try to sell to someone.” – Ben Goertzel, Chief Computer Scientist, Hanson Robotics
AI has come a long way since the film’s release in 2020, and
Big Tech leaders and investors such as Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and Peter
Diamandis offer a more positive outlook. Some of the good AI
is being used for includes detecting deadly weapons, diagnosing
life-threatening health problems, protecting biodiversity, and improving access
to nutrients and water. Another “good” outcome according to Musk is that “probably none of us will have
a job” and instead will have to rely on “universal high income,” a fantasy
unlikely to come true. To top it off, he predicts humans will be relegated to
“giving AI meaning” while man’s meaning fades away.
When asked how humans will navigate our identity as AI
continues to expand, Ray Kurzweil, futurist and Google director of
engineering, said:
“It’s going to be merged with us. We already carry around a lot of digital
intelligence today and that’s actually how this will be manifest, merging it
with ourselves.” During this same
event, Peter Diamandis, XPrize Foundation and Singularity
University founder, discussed meshing our minds together into a “hive
consciousness,” a concept he refers to as “Meta-Intelligence.”
Can both outlooks regarding the future of AI be true? One
describes killing, brainwashing, and oppressive surveillance while the other
forecasts planetary and individual problem solving and a glorious merger of man
and machine. Are the positives being oversold to suspend doubts and fears
regarding potential negative outcomes? Perhaps an examination of digital ID and
biometrics can provide some clarity on which view is most accurate.
The United Nations Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) play a prominent role in advancing global digital transformation. Each
of the 17 SDGs functions as a roadmap to permanently restructuring a portion of
society. All 193 UN member nations are in lockstep with the plan.
SDG 16 – Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions says
that “by 2030, [all countries must] provide legal identity for all, including
birth registration” delivering the justification for digital IDs. SDG 1 – No Poverty, advocates for “digital IDs linked with
bank or mobile money accounts” to “improve the delivery of social protection
coverage and serve to better reach eligible beneficiaries.”
·Identifying the displaced – tracking
population movements, facilitating swift access to essential information for
each human being.
·Using digital ID for registration –
enabling the capture of disaggregated data by age, gender, disability, and
income, offering insights into the diverse impacts of disasters on different
groups.
·Disaster preparedness and emergency
management – storing valuable personal information, including
residence and medical conditions and aid in identifying vulnerable populations
and critical infrastructure.
·Energy system sustainability and resilience –
leveraging digital legal ID data to track energy consumption, inspire behavior
change, and enhance sustainability measures can mitigate climate-related
disasters.
·Empowering communities –
revolutionizing community participation in the energy sector by providing
secure access to energy resources and enabling energy trading within community
microgrids.
On the surface, these reasons for digital ID seem legitimate
and even noble. The UN and its government and NGO partners always sell the need
for digital ID under the guise of:
§fostering economic and social inclusion
§tracking immigrants, migrants, and refugees
§protecting against identity theft and financial
fraud
§simplifying access to government services
§lessening exposure of personal information
through cyber attacks
§enhancing convenience
§promoting information integrity
§mitigating the climate and energy crises
§reducing human error in identifying individuals
§slowing human trafficking
It’s hard to argue these are not altruistic goals.
Nonetheless, digital IDs can also be used to:
§employ
24/7 surveillance and data collection
§restrict
travel and access to goods and services
§destroy
privacy and online anonymity
§restrict
access to social media and Internet services
§track
compliance with medical dictates
§control
access to banking, public services, public spaces, entertainment venues,
medical facilities, workplaces, schools, etc.
§create
a social credit system that ranks individuals based on government compliance
§limit
access to vital needs such as water, food, and energy
§compromise
a person’s identity through security breaches
According to Comparitech, 50 countries already have fully
digitized identification schemes, overlooking the dangers highlighted. The rest
of the world is also hastily moving forward to create digital public infrastructure (DPI), where
digital ID takes center stage. A few recent headlines attest to this urgency.
Despite all the glowing promises from the UN, digital IDs
threaten to give governments the ability to control a person’s life down to
minute details. Brett Solomon, a digital human rights advocate and executive
director of Access Now, agrees, mentioning that digital ID “poses one of the
gravest risks to human rights of any technology…” He further adds that “we are
rushing headlong into a future where new technologies will converge to make the
risk much more severe.”
Papers No Longer Needed – Just Your Face
“If corporations and governments
start harvesting our biometric data en masse, they can get to know us far
better than we know ourselves, and they can then not just predict our feelings
but also manipulate our feelings and sell us anything they want — be it a
product or a politician. Biometric monitoring would make Cambridge Analytica’s
data hacking tactics look like something from the Stone Age.”
– Yuval Noah Harari
One of the converging technologies increasing the threat
from digital IDs is biometric identification. This rapidly growing field
includes identifying humans through facial recognition, iris and retina scans,
fingerprints, voice recognition, gestures, bodily implants, DNA matching, and
gait (how humans walk and move).
Facial recognition stands out as the most pervasive and
perhaps most problematic biometric tactic. It is being used by law enforcement
and border control, in medical facilities, retail stores, stadiums, airports,
and government buildings. It’s utilized by banks and financial services,
healthcare, and governments to verify identity. It is also a fundamental
building block for the creation of smart cities.
Each use case may provide benefits such as convenience and
security but also poses risks that could exacerbate tyrannical control of the
population. With technologies poised to detect emotion and mental state,
a Minority Report-style precrime detection regime could be
installed. But what happens to those who have been misidentified? What about
those penalized for minor infractions like jaywalking or criticizing the
government as exemplified in China’s social credit system?
Digital ID and biometric technologies have been introduced
as a technocratic panacea offering greater inclusivity, convenience, and
safety. In reality, they reduce human identity to a sequence of cloud-stored
data while enabling total surveillance of travel, economic activity, and health
status with the potential to obliterate privacy and anonymity.
I’m sure they exist, but I’ve never met anyone desiring a
digital ID, especially after the autocratic fiasco of vaccine
passports during the COVID era. According to a report by Iain Davis and Whitney Webb, this
resistance is not imaginary, as they indicated “the rollout of CBDCs and the
prerequisite digital ID has so far been a disaster for the regime. Regardless
of the culture, people in India, China and elsewhere have
shown a distinct lack of enthusiasm for embracing their planned digital future.
In fact, they are actively resisting in many instances.”
Australia is one country that faced staunch opposition to
its digital ID plans. Though its digital ID system legislation was recently passed by Parliament, it did not go
without resistance. In fact, concessions were made to those expressing concerns
about privacy, biometric testing, and mandatory usage within the legislation. A
recent Sky News video describes
the extent of the resistance, echoing many of the concerns we have already
presented.
Digital ID can conceivably allow surveillance of everything
one does and says online. With the overemphasis on mis- and disinformation,
digital IDs can strengthen Big Tech and government’s ability to control speech.
By censoring, deplatforming, and restricting access, ideas and speech deemed
“hateful” or contrary to accepted narratives can be suppressed, erased, or
prevented from ever appearing.
One of the ways to dismiss concerns is by reassuring
citizens that digital IDs will not become mandatory and that other forms of ID
will still be accepted. However, these assurances seem unlikely to last given
the billions of dollars being spent on digital ID efforts from governments and
corporations worldwide. The switcheroo will probably occur sooner or later.
A Freer, Decentralized or More Tightly Controlled World?
“Government is the biggest
threat to digital data anywhere around the world… What is national security?
All a government needs to do to violate a person’s right to privacy is write a
letter and cite national security.”
– Solomon Okedara, Digital Rights Lawyers
Initiative
We have been constantly told that the digital genie
unleashed can’t be put back in the bottle. Scientists, tech wizards, and
bureaucrats are seizing opportunities to craft the future and stake their claim
to the billions of dollars up for grabs in research, development, and
deployment.
There’s no doubt that some good may come
from their efforts. As history has shown, whether technology is used for good
or evil depends on the intent of those who possess and control it. The tools of
digital transformation may benefit society, alleviating some
of the frustrating, time-wasting processes we regularly engage in. But the
potential for social, financial, and even mental control must not be
disregarded. Freedom, liberty, and justice depend on eternal vigilance.
Is it mere coincidence that bio-digital surveillance tech
such as AI, digital ID, biometrics, CBDC, IoT, Smart Meters, and 5G all working
together can achieve the societal vision described in The Technocracy Study Course of 1945?
Is it also by chance that many of the UN SDGs mirror many elements outlined in
this publication?
Technocracy expert Patrick Wood doesn’t believe so, noting
that:
“…technocrats demand that every
single person in society be forced to participate in their system. Outliers
were not to be allowed then, nor are they to be allowed today. Want proof? Look
for the motto “Ensuring that no one is left behind” throughout the United
Nations’ literature on sustainable development. Another word for “ensure” is
“guarantee.” Globalists’ guarantees take the form of “mandates.” – Patrick Wood, The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism (p.
68), Kindle Edition
Going further, Wood adds that:
“According to The
Technocracy Study Course, the anticipated and promised “end products” would
be:
1. A high physical
standard of living
2. A high standard
of public health
3. A minimum of
unnecessary labor
4. A minimum of
wastage of non-replaceable resources
5. An educational
system to train the entire younger generation indiscriminately as regards all
considerations other than inherent ability – a Continental system of human
conditioning.” (Ed. Note: human conditioning is not education but rather
propaganda-style indoctrination.)
Not surprisingly, these outcomes overlap perfectly with the
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted at the 2030 Agenda
conference in September 2015:
1. Goal #1 – No poverty
2. Goal #3 – Good health and
well-being (the banner on Goal #3 states: “Vaccinate your family to protect
them and improve public health”)
3. Goal #8 – Decent work and
economic growth
4. Goal #12 – Responsible
Consumption and Production
5. Goal #4 – Quality
education
Wood also exposes the supreme value of data to technocratic
systems, disclosing that:
“To technocrats, there is no
such thing as too much surveillance. When they attain one level of monitoring,
their next step is to increase the level of magnification and collect even more
data. Their addiction to data is unquenchable and unstoppable!” (p. 126)
The bio-digital surveillance system of today certainly fits
everything Wood highlights. It is akin to a modern-day techno Tower of Babel.
Whether or not it’s desired, mankind is being pushed toward
life in a digital world bereft of privacy, individuality, and agency. The
apostles of AI, transhumanism, and bio-digital surveillance are coercing the
populace into their collective consciousness paradigm. [Blog Editor Bold Text
Emphasis] Using cognitive warfare techniques to implant their vision of
transcendence – the Omega Point where man and machine join to become a new
godlike creature – we have all been enlisted to join them on their
journey. If the path to this imagined utopia begins with warfare, surveillance,
and tyranny, it’s fair to question whether the feigned concept should even be
pursued. If history is a good indicator, it is likely to end in massive failure
and widespread human suffering.
At an event hosted by the Modern War Institute at West Point
in 2018, neuroscientist Dr. James Giordano told cadets that:
“… the brain is and will be the
21st century battle scape in many ways, end of story… You will
encounter some form of neurocognitive science that has been weaponized not only
in your military career but in your personal and professional lives… The more I
know about what makes you tick, the more my interactions can be geared with you
to make you tick the way I want you to.”
As early as 1928, propaganda pioneer Edward Bernays
understood how mind control could keep the public in line, proclaiming:
“The conscious and intelligent
manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important
element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of
society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of
our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our
ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. …In almost every act of
our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social
conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small
number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of
the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”
Bernays may not have envisioned this form of manipulation
and control could be miniaturized and replicated for all in a handheld device.
There are ghosts in the machines we stare at while we work, inform, and
entertain ourselves. These ghosts are directing a covert war against us,
deliberately spreading mis-and disinformation to confound, persuade, and
control our thoughts and actions. The U.S. Army has made
this plain. We would do well to at least understand the nature of
the offensive directed against us.
As the cognitive war rages against each of us, compelling us
to accept this paradigm or get left behind, tough decisions must be made, and
tough questions must be asked.
Will we buy into the scheme that equates humanity with mere
machinery? Or will we realize that we’ve been awesomely and wonderfully made by
a divine Creator?
Will we participate in our own denigration, meekly complying
with the selling of our data, invasion of our privacy, robbing of our wealth,
and destruction of our freedom? Or will we resist the militarization of our
minds by defying the technocratic tyrants?
Will we say no to absolute transparency? Or will we keep our
heads in the sand as privacy ebbs away into the ocean of bio-digital
surveillance?
What are your thoughts? Please leave a comment below.
If you value
our work, please consider supporting us by becoming a member. Members get
access to exclusive content for just $5 per month or $50 per year!
If you prefer a
one-time donation of any amount just click the link below for Buy Me
a Coffee. Your contribution helps us continue to provide original, insightful,
and challenging content. Every little bit helps!
.jpg)
