I’m about to cross post a
ZeroHedge
article entitled, “
The COVID-19 Scamdemic, Part 1: The Hard Road To A New
World Order”. The information you are about to read has typically been
consigned to the realm of Conspiracy Theory – suggesting made-up from little
factoids of disputed accuracy. The author Iain Davis does an excellent job of
linking source information that in my opinion transforms theory to Conspiracy
Fact.
TAKE A GANDER AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF.
JRH 8/30/20
Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit,
check
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal
account:
***************************
The COVID-19 Scamdemic, Part 1: The Hard Road To A New
World Order
08/29/2020 - 00:00
Among many similar globalist states,
The UK State is a
public-private partnership between government, financial institutions,
multinational corporations, global think tanks, and well funded third sector
organisations, such as so called
non
governmental organisations (NGO’s) and large
international charities.
Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding, grant
making and philanthropy, the UK State is a cohesive globalist organisation
that works with selected academics, scientific institutions and mainstream
media (MSM) outlets to advance a tightly controlled, predetermined narrative.
This designed consensus serves the interests and global
ambitions of a tiny group of disproportionately wealthy people.
This group of parasites, often misleadingly referred to as
the
“elite,” exploit all humanity for their own gain and to
consolidate and enhance their power. They
control the money supply and
the global debt, which is a debt owed to them.
Human beings are forced to pay tax which, via government
procurement, flows directly to the private corporations they own.
War, security, infrastructure projects,
education and health care provide profits and are used by the parasite
class to socially engineer society.
Globally, they fund all political parties, with any
realistic chance of gaining power, they
own the MSM and spend billions
lobbying policy makers.
Through think tanks and the actions of
“independent” political
activists, such as the
FPAction
Network, they directly fund political campaigns in
exchange for the politician’s loyalty to them, not to the electorate.
Through their tax exempt grant making foundations, such
as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF),
they control the scientific, medical and academic orthodoxy.
This global network of oligarchs is moving towards the final
stages of its long held plan to construct a single global system of governance.
Often referred to as the
New World Order (NWO), it is a
collaboration between supranational political organisations, like the United
Nations and
the European Union, controlled
scientific authorities, such as the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
and the World Health Organisation (WHO), global financial institutions,
including the World Bank, IMF, ECB and
Bank for International
Settlements (BIS), globalist organisations like
the World Economic Forum (WEF), NGO’s like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and
policy making thinks tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Club
of Rome and the Trilateral Commission.
The UK State is one, prominent tentacle of the emerging
global governance system. It has capitalised on the COVID 19 crisis to create
the conditions for a new global economic and political model. While COVID
19 appears to be a nasty strain of the common coronavirus, in Part 2 we will
discuss how the UK State has spun a fake narrative about the disease to further
the interests of its globalist, oligarch masters. Managing a response to a
pandemic is merely the deceptive justification for the planned re-engineering of
society.
In partnership with Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Security and the BMGF, the WEF were chief architects of Event 201 which plotted, in quite
precise detail, the global lockdown and the world’s media response to a global
coronavirus pandemic. Event 201 was staged merely a matter of months before
a global coronavirus pandemic broke out. Both the government lockdown and MSM
response have proceeded exactly as they predicted.
To say this is all just a coincidence, and not worthy of
further scrutiny, is beyond obtuse. The WEF’s extensive and detailed
COVID
19 Action Platform was up and running
on March 12th 2020. The day after
the WHO declared a global COVID 19 pandemic.
It is clear from the WEF’s own words, that they see COVID 19
as a fantastic opportunity. They state:
“The Covid-19 crisis, and the
political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally
changing the traditional context for decision-making…….As we enter a unique
window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights
to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the
direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of
business models and the management of a global commons.”
This is a proposal for global governance which supersedes
national sovereignty. It is as simple as that.
It is remarkable that there are still so many who accuse
any who point to this long standing New World Order plan, extensively
documented and spoken about by political leaders for generations, of being so
called conspiracy theorists. One wonders if these people can
read.
June 3rd, 2020
This is a clipped version of my
irreverent New World Order video:
Here I focus solely on the some of
the many statements made by political leaders around the world about the New
World Order.
So the next time someone says the
New World Order doesn't exist. Show them this.
Referencing the COVID 19 opportunities, one of the founders,
and current executive chairman, of the WEF Klaus Schwab recently wrote:
A sharp economic downturn has
already begun, and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s.
But, while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable. To achieve a better
outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our
societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working
conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate,
and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short,
we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
Capitalism requires a reset because the model of
closed
shop crony
capitalism, operated by the global parasite class for
centuries, has reached
the limits of growth. Therefore they need to
create a new economic paradigm (
the Great
Reset) both to further centralise and consolidate
their power and to fix their failing business model.
Following the 2008 banking collapse, while the people
were forced to suffer austerity to bail out the banks with a form of highly
selective crony socialism, the parasite class simply carried
on piling up the debt.
In the Basel Capital Accords III, supposedly designed to
stop the wild market speculations of banks which caused the collapse, they
effectively reduced the liquidity (capital reserve) requirements for banks,
allowing them to lend even more.
This process of allowing banks to create FIAT currency out
of nothing has inevitably led to a global debt of approximately $260 trillion,
which is more than
three times the size of the planets GDP.
However, this is small potatoes compared to the scale of the
financial products derivatives market. Estimated to be somewhere between
$600 trillion to more than $1 quadrillion.
While some say this is only the
notional amount of the debt
tied up in derivative contracts, the fact remains this is all debt.
Cumulatively, there isn’t enough productivity on Earth even
to service the interest on these debts, let alone pay them. Ultimately this is
debt owed to the oligarchs who control the world’s
system of central banks. It is a
Mickey Mouse system allowing monopolists to seize assets using their own funny
money.
While the power to create all FIAT currency, out of nothing
but debt creation, has afforded them immense economic and political control,
2008 demonstrated that their usury fraud can, and certainly will, collapse.
Hence the Great Reset. Responding to a pandemic, or saving lives,
has nothing to do with it.
While Technocracy, rule by technocrats appointed or elected
for their particular expertise, may sound appealing to some, the model proposed
relies upon the destruction of nations states to be replaced by a distant
global technocratic order that serves only the interests of its founding
oligarchs and financial benefactors.
This technocratic system was outlined in 1974 by former
US ambassador Richard N. Gardner, member of the CFR and the Trilateral
Commission, in his article
The Hard Road To World Order:
Never has there been such
widespread recognition by the world’s intellectual leadership of the necessity
for cooperation and planning on a truly global basis. Never has
there been such an extraordinary growth in the constructive potential of
transnational private organizations - not just multinational corporations but
international associations of every kind in which like-minded persons around
the world weave effective patterns of global action...
...
The hope for the foreseeable
future lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of
universal membership and general jurisdiction... but rather in... inventing or
adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal
with specific problems on a case-by-case basis... providing methods for
changing the law and enforcing it as it changes and developing the perception
of common interests...
In short, the “house of world
order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down
...
...but an end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than
the old-fashioned frontal assault.
The institutions of limited jurisdiction, such
as the IPCC and WHO, are already in place directing national government policy
across the world. In Britain, it is the role of the UK State to deliver the
obligatory policy changes in order to erode national sovereignty and create the
global governance technocracy. All globalist states are essentially
unconstitutional and treasonous.
The common interest, determined by the
technocrat class at the behest of their corporate oligarch paymasters, is
currently replacing individual liberties and freedoms. The human being is
becoming little more than a unit to be managed and directed
and, where necessary, disposed of.
Inalienable human rights are being ignored utterly in
pursuit of the common interest.
The global COVID 19 crisis is a catalysing event which
has been misused to bring about the Great Reset. In order to convince the
people to comply with their orders, the UK State has inculcated the population
into a state of fear.
States around the world have practised social engineering
using deception, by proselytising an unquestioning faith in an illusory form of
science (scientism), behaviour modification, unlawful regulation and
propaganda. They have used their obedient MSM to convince their peoples that
the threat of COVID 19 is significantly greater than it actually is.
In Part 2 we will focus on the deception of the UK State.
However, the same can be said for all other globalist states that have
similarly responded to the claimed pandemic.
COVID 19 has been exploited in order to replace our
inalienable human rights with an enforced obligation to obey public health
orders. Public health has become biosecurity and
there is no longer any such thing as a healthy human being. All humans are now
biohazards and biohazards must be controlled or removed from society for
the
common good.
With the British people living in unwarranted fear, the
UK State has been able to introduce draconian anti-democratic (quite literally)
legislation.
In other circumstances this would have been impossible
without significant revolt. Terrorising the public was essential to convince
them to believe that the State had to remove all their rights and freedoms in
order to keep them safe.
Initially deceiving the public that the
“emergency
measures” would be temporary, further
behaviour modification was
then used to force people to comply with a lengthening list of totalitarian
regulations. The objective was to move people towards passively accepting the
dictatorship of a surveillance state re-branded as
“the new normal.” Thus
far, it appears most people have been sufficiently frightened to meekly accept
their enslavement.
Throughout the Great Reset transition, the public face of
the globalist project has been Bill Gates.
However, while Gates has used his wealth to seize control of global public
health policy, he is just the current front man for
World Order 2.0. It is the
technological possibilities presented by the
4th Industrial Revolution which
the architects of the world order are capitalising upon.
When your biometric identity includes your vaccine immunity
status, there will be no necessity to legislate to make vaccines “compulsory.” Thus
avoiding any contentious public debate. As long as you fully comply with your
orders, you will be allowed controlled access to social and economic activity.
“Eventually we will have some
digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when
we have a vaccine who has received it.”
While vaccines may not be compulsory you won’t realistically
be able to participate in society, employment, run a business
or receive benefits, without the
appropriate vaccine or immunity status.
The BMGF have already invested more than $21 million in an
MIT project to create
a microneedle vaccine delivery system that
will inject a reactive die under the recipients skin which can then be scanned
by a reader. This pattern will act like an indelible bar code tattoo, enabling
the global authorities to monitor and control your whereabouts and behaviour.
With an estimated population of 5 million and
just 22 alleged deaths from
COVID 19 in the entire country (a population mortality risk of 0.0004%), and no
deaths at all for nearly three months, clearly these measures are not a
response to any genuine threat from COVID 19.
Having complete control over the testing and attribution
of disease status affords the biosecurity State the power to
potentially remove and detain its political enemies and dissenters without
trial. Those ordered to enforce biosecurity, in the “new normal,” have
exactly the same degree of authoritarian power that was invested in similar
rights abusers such as the Gestapo and the Stasi. Does history ever teach us
anything?
This quarantine policy in New Zealand is
designed to maintain the level of fear and accustom the population to
dictatorship. It also appears to be a provocation that may encourage
insurrection and revolt. With a monopoly on violence and the use of force,
violent uprisings invariably benefit the authoritarian State. It allows them to
claim legitimacy for an even more oppressive “crack down.”
Like Event 201, this is another example of the quite
extraordinary prescience of the people who form global governance policy. They
can not only predict, in almost perfect detail, what the media will discover
and report, but also nature itself.
Removing the
“infected” from their homes
and incarcerating them in detention centres mirrors the policy suggestion
of
Dr
Michael Ryan from the WHO. While New Zealand is the
first nominally democratic state to raid family homes and remove people by
force, it certainly won’t be the last. The UK State has already given itself
the power to do so in the
Health Protections (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020.
World economic activity will be administered by biosecurity
States and based upon sustainable development goals. This new, centrally planned,
global economy will be restricted only to permitted businesses.
Prior to his departure as governor of the Bank of England,
in lockstep with the Great Reset,
Mark Carney warned that
companies that don’t follow the correct sustainability policies,
“will
go bankrupt without question.” In other words, lines of credit,
without which business cannot hope to function, will be limited only to those
who adopt the approved polices.
This new economy will have very limited employment. Carney’s
successor Andrew Bailey has already stated that it would be important not to
keep people in
“unproductive jobs” and that job losses, as a
result of the COVID 19 crisis,
were inevitable.
They would not have been inevitable had
globalist State’s, like the UK, not responded to the crisis by shutting down
the world’s productive economy.
The preposterous spin of the bankers and carefully chosen
economists that the UK will simply bounce back from an
unprecedented 20% drop in GDP is
absurd. With
official UK unemployment of 2.7 million, more
than doubling in a single year, these numbers are merely the tip of a very
large, looming iceberg.
There are currently an additional estimated 7.8 million
British workers furloughed. That scheme is due to end in a couple of
months. The management consultancy firm McKinsey & Company estimate
that
7.6 million UK jobs are at risk.
This will, as ever, disproportionately impact the lowest
paid, with analysis suggesting that more than 50% of those at risk of
unemployment are already in jobs paying less than £10 per hour.
These are the
unproductive jobs and
livelihoods Bailey wants to get rid of. Across Europe and the Americas
staggering levels of unemployment are seemingly unavoidable. It is not
unreasonable to envisage at least
6 million long term unemployed in
the UK. With the same pattern common to many developed nations, the social,
economic and health impacts of this are almost beyond comprehension.
Many have long been warning, that the toll taken by the
Lockdown response to the supposed COVID 19 pandemic will be far worse than the
disease itself. This awful prospect is becoming increasingly apparent.
There is no reason to believe official UK COVID 19
statistics, something we’ll discuss in Part 2. However, even if we accept that
more than 41,000 people have died as a direct result of COVID 19, this sad loss
is likely to be relatively inconsequential compared to the loss of life as a
direct result of the UK State’s Lockdown policy.
It is important to recognise that the global lockdown
response was a political choice made to create the economic condition for the
Great Reset. It was not unavoidable, and there is no evidence that lockdowns
make any difference to COVID 19 mortality. South Korea, Japan and Sweden
did not impose full lockdowns and all have better COVID 19 outcomes that the
UK.
Research by the UK Department of Health, the Office of
National Statistics (ONS), the government’s Actuary Department and the UK Home
Office estimates that
200,000 people could die as a
result of re-orientating the NHS, to treat COVID 19 and little else, and from
the economic effects of Lockdown polices. Unfortunately, this
“worst
case” scenario appears conservative.
An example of the derisory
“scientism” used
to terrorise the population, in April the University of Glasgow
published a study estimating
average years of life lost (YLL) for individuals who
allegedly died
from COVID 19. Saying these were
alleged deaths does not imply
that no one died from COVID 19, only that we really
have no idea how many.
Nonetheless, using quite bizarre methodology, the Glasgow
researchers managed to calculate that the median YYL due to COVID 19 was 13
years for men and 11 years for women. This study was based upon analysis of the
outbreak in Italy, but was cited
by the UK MSM to scare the
British. More than 59% of supposed COVID 19 decedents in Italy
were over 80 years old.
Analysis from the
National Records of Scotland (NRS)
shows that median age of death,
supposedly from COVID 19, was
81 for men and 85 for woman. Statistically indistinguishable from quite normal
mortality.
The University of Glasgow researchers are funded by
the
Wellcome Trust who are the tax exempt
philanthropic foundation
of the multinational pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline. The University of
Glasgow are also grant recipients of the
COVID 19 Therapeutics Accelerator established
by the Wellcome Trust, Mastercard and the BMGF.
The Wellcome Trust and the BMGF want the world to be
vaccinated with their experimental COVID 19 vaccines. Despite the fact that
decades of trying have failed to produce a
successful
vaccine against SARS, or indeed for any coronavirus
strain, and that usually vaccine development takes at least 10 years, GSK and
the BMGF are among those who, for some apparently inexplicable reason, are
confident they can produce a successful vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in a matter of
months.
Obviously there is a huge conflict of financial interest at
the heart of the University of Glasgow’s spurious claims about YLL’s.
Pointing
out this fact makes you a conspiracy theorist. Though
ignoring it requires either a considerable degree of gullibility or a wilful
intent to deceive.
Between 2001 and 2016
economic and social deprivation in
England consistently accounted for a genuinely alarming 9.3 year average
reduced life expectancy (YLL’s) for males and, by 2016, shortened women’s lives
by 7.4 years. The economic devastation that will be wrought by the entirely
unnecessary Lockdown policy of the UK State, and others, measured in YLL’s,
will dwarf those lost to COVID 19.
This is the price we will all pay for the parasite class’
determination to bring about the Great Reset and change the world’s economy and
society to one centrally planned and controlled absolutely by them. They
are currently spending billions globally on propaganda to convince us to accept
their “new normal.”
They require our consent if their plans are going to
work. This means, in order to scupper them, all we need to do is refuse to
comply. While peaceful protest is an important unifying right,
ultimately it is what we do every day that will make the difference. There is a
nasty, fascist authoritarianism building in the UK, and elsewhere. Yet all we
need to do in order to defeat it is refuse, en masse, to follow its
orders.
Unfortunately, the UK State are among those
throwing
everything at convincing us to believe their frankly ridiculous, scientifically
illiterate, COVID 19 propaganda narrative. We only need wander to the local
supermarket and witness the faceless,
muzzled
majority to know the deception is working.
We are faced with an existential choice. We can
either give up any childish pretensions that we live in a free and open
democratic society that values liberty and plurality of opinion, and accept the
fascist dictatorial rule of a global technocratic parasite, or we can
exercise conscious resistance and refuse to comply with the orders of the
State.
In Part 2, we will dissect the
mechanism of the UK State’s scamdemic. While Lockdown policies originate at a
global level, by looking at how the UK State has implemented them, and the
deception they have used to convince the public to accept them, the true nature
of the scamdemic can be revealed.
_______________________________
