DONATE

Sunday, November 2, 2025

Keep ARCTIC FROST Probe in Mind as Future Elections Emerge


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© November 2, 2025

 

Arctic Frost was the Biden FBI/DOJ term used to target the political opposition of Dem-Marxists tyranny and Bureaucratic Deep State despotism. If you were a person or Group with clout, the TYRANNY needed to silence you. This is beyond Trump Derangement Syndrome! This was an installed government attempting to preserve power by silencing ALL opposition to the official narrative. Which apparently had the aim to institutionalize corrupt elections under the delusion of fair elections.

 

Arctic Frost has been exposed at least since September 2025 and so is not new information. The lack of MSM coverage of this outrage that borders on government sponsored treason against the Constitution and the Republic, means this TYRANNY needs to be brought up from time to time to stimulate the consciousness of Patriots who desire to unshred the Constitution and preserve our Founding Fathers’ Republic.

 

Senator Chuck Grassley appears to at the forefront at exposing this criminal tyranny and has used his Senatorial status to unleash Arctic Frost information. Other News sources reporting:

 

o   ARCTIC FROST: Biden FBI Investigated Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA, Republican Groups; By Joel B. Pollak; BREITBART; 9/16/25

 

o   Bombshell: Grassley Exposes FBI’s ‘Arctic Frost’ Targeting 92 Republican Groups Nationwide, Including Turning Point USA [WATCH]; By LifeZette News Staff; LifeZette; 9/16/25

 

o   Merrick Garland, Chris Wray signed off on ‘Arctic Frost’ probe that targeted GOP groups, ‘spied’ on senators, documents show; By Josh Christenson; NY Post; 10/23/25 4:53 p.m. ET

 

Roger Stone ran an awesome Editorial piece on his Substack page that should fire-up Patriots:

 

o   The Evil of Arctic Frost and the Cry for Justice: Arctic Frost was not an investigation. It was an atrocity disguised as law; By Roger Stone; Stone Cold Truth; 10/30/25

 

The post that rekindled my attention toward the Arctic Frost government tyranny was a November 1 post at the WLT Report which I am cross posting below.

 

JRH 11/2/25

Always Free to Read yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com  

>>SHOP TAB<<

*********************************

The WORST Scandal Of Our Lifetime — Arctic Frost Explained

Obama-Devil (WLT Report Photo – The photo is of Satan from 2013 TV Miniseries “The Bible”. The Satan depiction stirred a bit of amusing controversy in 2013 because the actor appeared to amazingly look like Obama.)

 

By Noah

November 1, 2025

WLT Report

 

It’s becoming hard to keep up with all the Obama/Biden scandals that are emerging, because it seems like a new one pops up every day.

 

And eventually like the Boy Who Cried Wolf, they start to fall on deaf ears.

 

But the difference here is these aren’t fake.  This isn’t crying wolf.  This is just one massive, real scandal after another coming to light.

 

And “Arctic Frost” may indeed be the worst of them all, so I wanted to take a moment to explain to you very simply what it is so you understand and keep it in mind going forward.

 

You may want to bookmark this and please help me by sharing it all around.

 

Let’s start with a quick summary in case you haven’t been following this story at all:

 

§  A sweeping, partisan dragnet: The Biden-era FBI, DOJ, and special counsel Jack Smith ran an investigation codenamed Arctic Frost that targeted the Republican political ecosystem, not a narrow criminal case.

 

§  Volume & scope of demands: The operation issued 197 subpoenas spanning about 1,700 pages, covering 34 individuals and 163 businesses, touching over 400 Republican people and entities including campaigns, groups, donors, and vendors.

 

§  Targeting lawmakers’ phone data: Smith’s team obtained phone and metadata records for Republican senators, staff, and committees, with cooperation from Verizon and resistance from AT&T, all under sealed gag orders signed by Chief Judge James Boasberg.

 

§  Media, donors, and conservative orgs swept in: The subpoenas reached conservative media companies, major donors, and organizations like Turning Point USA and the Republican Attorneys General Association, showing that the probe extended far beyond campaign staff.

 

§  Bank and financial records grabs: The investigation demanded records from banks and payment processors, exposing the finances of conservative groups and individuals aligned with the GOP.

 

§  An “enemies list”: Arctic Frost functioned as a modern political enemies list, vacuuming up data on hundreds of Republicans, including members of Congress, campaign workers, and activists.

 

§  Green-lit at the top: Attorney General Merrick Garland and senior DOJ and FBI officials approved or supervised the operation, making it a Biden administration-directed effort.

 

§  Constitutional and structural abuse: Arctic Frost represented a weaponization of federal law enforcement against political opponents, violating First Amendment rights, separation of powers, and grand-jury secrecy laws through the use of broad, sealed subpoenas and gag orders.

 

§  Tainted prosecutions: The evidence gathered through Arctic Frost was used in Jack Smith’s election-related case against Donald Trump, making that prosecution illegitimate because it relied on politically tainted material.

 

§  Accountability demanded: Republicans are calling for full disclosure, hearings, sanctions, and potential impeachment of Judge Boasberg, along with reforms to prevent the DOJ and FBI from targeting political actors again.

 

And who granted all the subpoenas?

 

Judge Boasberg, of course!

 

Jack Smith and Judge Boasberg:

 

 

Here is Sen. Chuck Grassley laying it all out there…

 

For the people who prefer to watch video, just listen as Grassley explains exactly what they did to him — and all other Republicans:

 

 

And now I want to end with Glenn Beck, who I think summarized this better than anyone I have seen.

 

Watch here — he’s 100% right:

 

Youtube VIDEO: Why this Deep State spy campaign is the WORST scandal of my lifetime


 

[Posted by Glenn Beck

Posted on Oct 30, 2025

 

…MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

[TRANSCRIPT]

 

Glenn Beck:

 

While we’re talking about winter, let’s talk about Arctic Frost. That is the code name.

 

And according to the records released now by Senator Chuck Grassley and the House Judiciary Committee, the Biden-era DOJ and special counsel Jack Smith drove an investigation that sprayed subpoenas like a fire hose.

 

We now know there were 197 subpoenas spanning more than 1,700 pages sent to 34 people, 163 businesses, and then vacuumed up communications tied to more than 400 Republican individuals and entities.

 

Okay, that’s reaching into everything. They reached into media companies—CBS, Fox, Fox Business, Newsmax, Sinclair—into financial institutions, into political organizations, even members, employees, and agents of the legislative branch.

 

So now you have congressmen and senators being vacuumed up into this whole thing. This is not a precision rifle shot. This is a net—and a very big dragnet.

 

Okay, this is not the way justice in America works. You do not go after an entire party—400 people.

 

Now, what were they looking for? How did it start? Well, let me say—the opening memo to justify Arctic Frost is called, in legal terms, the predicate.

 

And it was stamped Sensitive Investigative Matter. Okay? And it cited—and I love this, listen to this language—cited evidence suggesting a conspiracy around alternate electors.

 

I’m going to get to that here in just a second. But it relied on—leaned on—news clips.

 

News clips! To vacuum all these people up. To get the engine turning. News clips were used, suggesting—not proving—suggesting! And it just rose up the ladder: Wray, Garland, Monaco… even coordination with the White House Counsel’s Office—it surfaces now in the record.

 

This went all the way to the top. This is not my language. This is what the documents now on the table imply.

 

Okay. Now, let me just pause for a minute in the reading room of American memory. What is this all about? Alternate electors.

 

That’s not a Martian invention, okay? That’s not something completely foreign. We’ve seen them before—1876 and 1960.

 

They were messy, contested, deeply political moments that produced zero criminal prosecutions for their existence of rival slates. In fact, Al Gore—if he didn’t set an alternate slate of electors—he was counseled to, and I’ve talked to Dershowitz about this.

 

He was counseled to have an alternate set of electors, because once—if you don’t do that, and the tables turn, and you realize there was a problem—if you haven’t seated those electors before a certain time, you have no case. You can’t change anything.

 

So it has to happen. And it has happened two times before. I think three—but definitely in 1876 and 1960.

 

In Hawaii in 1960, Democrats signed certificates while a recount was still underway. The recount flipped, so it was ultimately certified—the Democratic slate was certified.

 

Ugly? Yes. But that’s the way it works. It’s not criminal. And history has said no, it’s not criminal.

 

But it doesn’t matter when it’s about Donald Trump.

 

So, let me go back to Arctic Frost. Now, as the subpoenas flew, the FBI reportedly snooped phone records of Republican members of Congress. The scope widened to donor analytics, broad financial data, Trump world advisors, the lawyers, the media contacts.

 

We said during January 6—we said internally—if you don’t think they are going after a massive tree… because remember, this is what the Patriot Act allows you to do now.

 

You go after one person. If anybody is calling somebody else, that person can now be hoovered up. And who has that person called?

 

So you could get pretty much everybody that you want with one subpoena. But that’s not where they stopped. They didn’t stop with one subpoena.

 

Okay. When the state casts a dragnet over the opposition’s political ecosystem—with the authority to seize all their communications, compel testimony, and chill the donors—that’s not tough politics, okay?

 

That is the government, with badges and grand juries, leaning its full weight into one side of the national scale.

 

Watergate, please.

 

Watergate! Let me compare Watergate. You know what Watergate was? It was a gang of political operatives who broke into an office to get information.

 

They weren’t even losing the election. Nobody even knows why they would have done this—it was so stupid that they even did it. But it was a local office.

 

They broke in. They wanted to get some information that was there—on the candidate and on the race—and then they covered it up and tried to keep the public from the truth.

 

It was wrong. It was criminal. And it forced a president to resign. People went to prison over it.

 

But Watergate was a private burglary executed by a campaign and covered up by the White House. Terrible. Awful.

 

That’s not the DOJ blanketing the opposing party’s entire world with federal subpoenas while citing news hits as the predicate.

 

Do you see the difference?

 

Watergate was an attempt to weaponize a campaign. Arctic Frost, if the emerging records hold, was the attempt to weaponize the entire state against a political party.

 

The difference there is the whole ball game under a constitutional republic. You don’t have a constitutional republic if that’s allowed to happen.

 

In America, the state is supposed to be the neutral referee—not a sideline enforcer wearing one team’s colors under the stripes.

 

And don’t even start with me on, “Well, what about Donald Trump?”

 

We’ll play that game all day long. And you know where that gets us? Nowhere.

 

You want to make a charge against Donald Trump and what he’s doing? Good. Let’s take that separately. Let’s do that.

 

I’m willing to—let’s take that separately. Let’s deal with this one first.

 

Okay. The moment the referee picks up the ball and starts running, the game is over. It’s not a fair game anymore.

 

And if it can be done to them today, it will be done to you tomorrow. That’s not a slogan. That’s a law of political gravity.

 

Yeah, but Trump did—yeah, let’s have that conversation. But can we at least have it honestly?

 

Because if you think this is about whataboutism, you cannot see the nose on the front of your face. You’re completely missing this.

 

You cannot make the weaponization of government a partisan inheritance that each side can claim when it holds power.

 

If any president—any prosecutor, red or blue—uses federal power to criminalize political opposition rather than prosecute clear crimes, it is an offense against equal protection under the law.

 

So, let’s lay down a standard here that I’m willing to apply to Donald Trump, to Joe Biden, and any other president that comes our way—because if we don’t lay this clear standard down, we’re done.

 

The predicate—it has to be real, not rhetorical.

 

Evidence “suggesting” via TV interviews is circular sourcing at its best. It’s not something that you launch a sprawling investigation on—into a presidential rival’s universe.

 

If you can’t articulate the crime specifically, you don’t get to launch a dragnet on the people running against you.

 

The scope has to be narrow and tied exactly to the alleged crime—not a sweep through media organizations and donor records and opposition infrastructure under vague theories that come from TV reports.

 

Journalism, political advocacy, fundraising—all of those things are protected activities.

 

Separation from the White House also must be unmistakable.

 

If the White House Counsel’s Office is coordinating device transfers into an investigation of its chief political rival, alarms should clang in every corridor of every main justice hall.

 

Everywhere, the alarms—the klaxons—should be going off right now.

 

Also, historic practice matters.

 

If prior episodes—by the way, this was all thrown out by the Supreme Court, so you know, okay, nothing there—if prior episodes (1876, 1960, and I believe 2000) were treated as political, not criminal—especially where alternate electors were explicitly conditional—then you need compelling new legal theories and clean facts to criminalize it.

 

You can’t just say, “Yeah, well, history never did anything about that before, and actually they said it was fine, but now it’s going to be a crime.”

 

What? Wait—can you be specific on what has changed?

 

“Well, we really dislike the people doing it this time.”

 

That doesn’t count. That doesn’t count.

 

Now, before anybody clips this monologue and screams, “Glenn Beck said nobody in the Trump administration did anything wrong!”—well, I don’t think so. But that’s not what I’m saying.

 

Because I’m not the judge. I’m not your juror.

 

I’m the guy insisting that the rules are rules—and they should be applied to everyone on all sides.

 

Smith has his report. He says he wants to tell his side. Great. Put him under oath.

 

If he didn’t do it, then he should be set free. But it should be on a clear set of laws.

 

What’s happened in the Biden administration—they just kept changing laws. “Well, yeah, I mean, the bank said there was no crime, but Donald Trump!”

 

And so, all of a sudden, there was a crime. Nobody’s ever been prosecuted ever before for that. Even the bank said, “This is ridiculous. There’s no crime here.”

 

Didn’t matter. That’s not justice.

 

I want real justice. Smith says he has a side—let’s hear it. Bring forward the memos. Publish the predicate.

 

Let the country see whether we had a criminal case or an election-cycle dragnet—because that’s what it looks like.

 

If the emerging picture is right—if Arctic Frost opened up on thin evidence, escalated on political pressure, and metastasized into a government-wide sweep of the sitting president’s chief rival and his entire ecosystem—then this is not just like Watergate.

 

This is much, much, much worse than Watergate—in kind, not just degree.

 

Watergate tried to steal information. That’s it.

 

They potentially attempted to steal legitimacy—to criminalize opposition by wielding the sword of the state.

 

That violates more than statutes. That violates our creed—that free men govern themselves by consent, and the process is sacred.

 

And the law is the wall that even presidents and prosecutors can never climb over.

 

If proven, the remedy is not a sternly worded letter or an op-ed and a shrug.

 

The remedy is the full force of the law—Inspector General referrals, special counsels where appropriate, prosecution where crimes are clear, statutory reforms to bar this from ever happening again.

 

From press clippings being your predicate? No.

 

Bright lines need to be drawn—protections for the press, for donors, for legislators in political cases.

 

Sunlight. All the sunlight. On how this began, who approved it, and why no one in the administration said stop.

 

And to my friends who say, “Well, Trump is doing the same thing.” I hear you. I don’t agree with you, but I hear you.

 

Why don’t we codify the guardrails right now—so when emotions are high and temptations are strong, the Republic doesn’t survive by trusting that our guys will be angels?

 

It survives on the chains on power—everyone’s power.

 

You know, when you hold a founding sermon in your hand, when you read the ink of Washington, scratched in the margin notes of James Madison, you discover that America’s miracle wasn’t that we selected saints.

 

It’s that we built a system where even the sinners are fenced in by law. That’s the process.

 

When justice is blind to banners and bumper stickers and political parties—that’s when America is America.

 

Arctic Frost—if the record stands—it took a blowtorch to that fence.

 

So, the choice is really simple: retreat into teams, each side cheering for its prosecutors and its dragnet—or do the harder, nobler thing, just like our founders did, and insist that the same rules that bind all power—especially when it’s aimed at people we dislike—are enforced.

 

That’s how you keep a republic. That’s how you make sure there’s not a second Watergate—because we learned the lesson the first time.

 

But did we?

 

Because if we haven’t, if we don’t learn it this time—then by God, we are done.

 

The story of America is not a story of who got whom.

 

It’s a story of a people who refuse to let the government become a weapon.

 

And if that spirit still lives in us, then this cold wind called Arctic Frost will pass—and the Constitution will stand because you stood for equal justice, for due process, for truth that doesn’t bend to politics.

 

And that—that is how we relight the torch of America.

 

© 2025 WLTReport. All Rights Reserved

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)