John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© December 12, 2023
If you’ve read my posts, you aware of my opinion (or is it
FACT!) that the U.S. Government has become so corrupted by an UNELECTED
Globalist/Marxist Elitist Bureaucracy that it is completely untrustworthy to fulfill
its Constitutional Duty to the American Public.
AND IF our Government is corrupted as I assert, then that
means when any so-called instructions issued to the American Public is more
than likely based on a LIE with an agenda to manipulate the minds of citizens
to comply to some form Un-American Globalist agenda that benefits the Elitist
Few and NOT the Liberty-Freedom of the American masses.
I am sharing posts that highlight the influence of
government corruption and lying to manipulate YOU as a citizen to comply to the
will of the few:
§ Dr.
Mattias Desmet: Technocratic Totalitarianism: The Importance of
Truth Speech. The parallel Rise of Propaganda-dependent Elites and Lonely
Masses, and need for a new type of politician; By ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS; Who is Robert Malone
(Substack); 12/11/23
§ DailyClout
Wholly Erased All at Once from Facebook, Instagram; Users Receive Threatening
Messages: A Massive Censorship Attack on Us -- One Day after my
@WarRoom Interview Explaining mRNA Vaccine-Caused "Frameshifting" has
720,000 Views; By DR
NAOMI WOLF; Outspoken
with Dr Naomi Wolf (Substack); 12/11/23
§ How to Demoralize
a Nation; By LILY; A Lily Bit (Substack); 12/11/23
The commonality among these posts is mass manipulation,
populace control and restricting truthful information to maintain mass
docility. SO I SAY – DO NOT COMPLY!
I JUST REALIZED this is going to be a LONG-READ post.
If you are in a time constraint situation you might want to bookmark it and
return as your time permits. OR if you have a particular affinity to a
topical-subject or author, you can click the above embedded links and go
directly to the Substack page you are most interested in reading.
JRH12/12/23
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers willing to chip
in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE
to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
************************
Dr. Mattias Desmet: Technocratic Totalitarianism
The Importance of Truth Speech. The parallel Rise of
Propaganda-dependent Elites and Lonely Masses, and need for a new type of
politician.
Dr. Mattias Desmet at ICS4 (Who is Robert Malone Photo)
December 11, 2023
Bitchute VIDEO: Dr. Mattias Desmet (Technocratic Totalitarianism) - ICS4
11-2023
[Posted by SlantRight2
First Published December 12th,
2023 15:58 UTC
In my opinion, one of the more important speeches provided
at the recent Fourth International COVID/Crisis Summit, held last November 2023
in Bucharest Romania, was delivered by my friend and colleague Dr. Mattias
Desmet. Many but perhaps not all readers of this substack will be familiar with
his groundbreaking synthesis published under the title “Psychology
of Totalitarianism”. Others may recall my discussing Mattias’
theories and insights on various podcasts and with Mr. Joe Rogan, and the
subsequent censorship response by Google and others when the terms “Mass
Formation” and “Mass Formation Psychosis” were suddenly and explosively
trending.
Dr. Desmet, Dr. Jill Glasspool-Malone and I have spent many
hours together since then, in our home, in his home, in Spain shooting the
“Headwinds” films which were broadcast by the Epoch Times, visiting mutual
friends, and in conferences such as ICS IV. I worked hard to make it possible
for him to attend that meeting while maintaining his teaching schedule. He
writes to me that there has been a concerted effort to convince him that I am
“controlled opposition”, and to convince that he should disassociate from me.
But, unfortunately for the propagandists and chaos agents, that is unlikely to
happen as we have spent these many hours building a collaborative friendship
and have been through thick and thin together. I steadfastly supported him
through the academic attacks he has had, helped him build his substack
following, and defended him when the Breggins maliciously attacked and defamed
him.
These many concerted censorship and defamation attacks have
taken a toll on him, as they have on me, but we both remain standing and
continue our efforts to discern truth through the fog of the psychological war,
the fifth generation warfare, which swirls around us.
Mattias is now focusing on his next book, which looks
forward towards how we can win the PsyWay battle for our minds, thoughts and
souls being waged against all of us by globalist Elites. As I listened to his
speech at the ICS IV, I was amazed at how his thinking has continued to mature,
and by the clarity of his thought and insights.
Strangely, a few minutes into his speech the video feed cut
out, and those watching the streaming video were not able to see what I was
watching in person. Returning to the USA, his was among the first that I wanted
to transcribe and post to this substack, together with those of MEP
Christian Terhes, Dr.
Harvey Risch, Dr.
Jill Glasspool-Malone, and Dr.
Denis Rancourt. But no-one seemed to be able to find or recover
video or even audio recordings of Mattias’ speech.
Finally, a recording was identified, and has now been
uploaded both above and at the ICS IV website. Since that time, recordings of
some of these speeches have been removed from youtube, and there have been
efforts by unknown actors to even remove material from the ICS IV website archives.
If you are interested in any of this material, you may wish to view and/or
download copies sooner rather than later, or they may become scrubbed from
digital history as has been happening with so many key resources concerning the
global mismanagement of the COVIDcrisis.
The history of the CIA since its founding is intimately
wrapped up in Operation
Mockingbird, a concerted campaign continuously developed since the
1940s to control US and global media, reporting (and “reporters”), and
academia. Together with MI5/MI6 in the UK, this “Mighty
Wurlitzer” has been used to shape a narrative - a series of
carefully promoted US Government lies - which have dominated the worldview of
literally all western nation citizens. As Mattias explains in this lecture, the
continuing advancement of these propaganda capabilities have been considered
necessary to prop up, “legitimize” and provide cover for a wide range of
nefarious, self-serving actions on the part of a very small group of hereditary
“Elites” who have sought to control the peoples, governments and economies of
the world- at the expense of the interests of humanity at large. The rest of us
have paid an enormous price in suffering and psychological damage, which is
rooted in a sense of disaffection from each other and society - loneliness.
Perhaps one of the most positive aspects of the COVIDcrisis
is that many, including myself and perhaps also yourself, have become aware
that we are being manipulated, lied to, and forced to comply with the wishes of
these Globalist Elites who exert their will via force, violence, and coercion
on a global scale. The work of reporters Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi (The Racket News) and so many
others have picked up where Carl Bernstein once left off in documenting the
Censorship-Industrial complex. We now have the documents and receipts
demonstrating how thoroughly we have all been played. The question now is what
to do about it.
In his speech at ICS IV, Dr. Desmet provides a glimpse into
his prescription for healing those of us who have damaged, and his vision for
how we can recover our sovereignty, personal psychological autonomy, and
rebuild a more functional society devoid of the nefarious hidden hand of
Elite-sponsored propaganda and psychological manipulation.
I heartily recommend reviewing and carefully considering his
thoughts, and I eagerly look forward to his new book in which he provides
further details.
^^^^^
Dear friends,
A few weeks ago I gave a speech at the fourth International Crisis Summit in
the Romanian Parliament. Below you find the text of the speech I prepared and
the video recording of the speech I actually gave. I usually don't prepare a
speech, simply because for some reason I never stick to the plan. Ultimately, I
always express the words as they come on the spot and at the moment. This time
was no different – the text below and the actual speech are different. That
being said, I hope you will read it. In the beginning I repeat some things
about totalitarianism that you might be familiar with if you've listened to my
interviews. But the rest of the text is all about the perversion of political
discourse in our society and the need for a new type of politician who leaves
propaganda and rhetoric behind and re-appreciates truth speech.
Warm wishes,
Mattias
^^^^^
Prepared Remarks
Dear members of the Romanian parliament,
Dear audience,
Dear ladies and gentlemen,
As some of you might know, I wrote a book, titled The
Psychology of Totalitarianism. It is about a new kind of
totalitarianism that is emerging now, a totalitarianism which is not so much a
communist or fascist totalitarianism, but a technocratic totalitarianism.
I have articulated my theory on totalitarianism on so many
occasions. I will only present the gist of it here and move on to a problem
which is particularly relevant for an address in a political institution such
as this parliament: the perversion of political discourse in the Enlightenment
tradition.
Here is in a nutshell what I articulated on totalitarianism
throughout the last years: totalitarianism is not a coincidence. It is a
logical consequence of our materialist-rationalist view on man and the world.
When this view on man and the world became dominant, as a spontaneous
consequence, a new elite ánd a new population emerged. A new elite that
excessively used propaganda as a means to control and steer the population; and
a population which lapsed more and more into loneliness and disconnectedness, both
from its social and its natural environment.
These two evolutions, the emergence of an elite that uses
propaganda and a lonely population, reinforced each other. The lonely state is
exactly the state in which a population is vulnerable for propaganda. In this
way, a new kind of masses or crowds emerged throughout the last two centuries:
the so-called lonely masses.
People fall prey to mass formation to escape a pervasive
feeling of loneliness and disconnectedness, induced by the rationalization of
the world and the ensuing industrialization of the world and the excessive use
of technology. They merge together in fanatic mass behavior because this seems
to free them from their lonely, atomized state.
And that is exactly the big illusion of mass formation:
belonging to a mass doesn’t liberate a human being from its lonely state. Not
at all. A mass is a group that is formed, not because individuals connect to
each other, but because each individual separately is connected to a collective
ideal. The longer a mass formation exists, the more solidarity they feel for
the collective and the less solidarity and love they feel for other
individuals. That’s exactly why in the end stage of mass formation and totalitarianism,
every individual reports every other individual to the collective, or to the
state, if they think that other individual is not loyal enough to the state.
And in the end, the unthinkable happens, with mothers reporting their children
to the state and children their parents.
The lonely masses distinguish themselves in several respects
from the physical masses of earlier times: they can be much better controlled,
they are less unpredictable than physical masses, and they last longer, in
particular if they are constantly fed by propaganda through mass-media. The
creation of long lasting lonely masses through propaganda was the psychological
basis for the emergence of the large totalitarian systems of the twentieth
century. Only if a mass formation exists for decades can it be made the basis
of a state system.
The emergence of lonely masses led to Stalinism and Nazism
in the beginning of the twentieth century and now it might lead to technocratic
totalitarianism. I described the psychological processes involved in the
emergence of lonely masses on many occasions, and I won’t repeat it here.
Today, here, in the Romanian parliament, a political
institution, I address politicians. I want to tell you that politicians have a
particular responsibility in these times of emerging totalitarianism.
Totalitarianism, as Hannah Arendt said, is a diabolic pact between the masses
and the political elites. Political elites need to contemplate –scrutinize the
ethical qualities of their speech. There is something wrong with political
discourse. This is what I intend to say: political discourse is perverted.
For instance, we got used to the fact that politicians, once
they are elected, never do what they promised to do in their election speeches.
How far are we removed from political virtue as described by Aristotle. For
Aristotle, the core of political virtue was the courage to speak the Truth, or,
to use the Greek term, Parrhesia, bold speech, in which someone
says exactly this what society doesn’t want to hear, but which is necessary to
keep it psychologically healthy.
I am not so much accusing individual politicians here; I am
addressing political culture in general. And even more, I am talking about a
perversion that is inherent to the entire tradition of Enlightenment. Our
society is in the grip of a specific type of lying, a kind of lying that is
historically speaking relatively new, that emerged for the first time after the
French revolution, when the religious view on man and the world was replaced by
our current, rationalist-materialist worldview. What am I talking about when I
refer to this ‘new kind of lie’? I am talking about the phenomenon of
‘propaganda’.
Propaganda is everywhere around us. Public space is
saturated with it. Recent years have illustrated that abundantly, during the
coronacrisis, during the Ukraine crisis, and now, even more clearly, during the
coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict on both mainstream and social media.
It is not that I do not understand the motivation of those
who choose for propaganda. They often start from good intentions. Or at least:
somewhere, they do believe in their good intentions. Read the work of the
founding fathers of propaganda, such as Lippman, Trotter and Bernays. They
believe that the only way for the leaders to keep control in society and to
prevent society of lapsing into chaos is propaganda. The leaders cannot overtly
impose their will anymore to the population. Nobody would accept that within a
materialist-rationalist society. Hence, the only way to make the population do
what the leaders want, is to make them do what the leaders want without them
knowing that they do what the leaders want. In others words: the only way to
control the population is through manipulation.
The people in favor of propaganda will argue that we can
never tackle the challenges of climate change and viral outbreaks through
democratic means. They will ask: ‘Do you think people will voluntarily give up
their cars and flying holidays? To escape disaster, we need technocracy, a
society led by technical experts, and to install technocracy, we need to
mislead the population, we need to manipulate them into technocracy’.
First of all, I want to tell you that I don’t believe
technocracy is a solution to the problem. But that’s not what matters most. Let
me tell you something: to try to create a good society for the human being
through manipulation, is a contradictio in terminis. The essence
and core of a good society is exactly the ethical quality of public discourse.
Man, in the end, essentially is an ethical being, and to pervert man’s speech
is to pervert man itself; to pervert political speech is to pervert society
itself.
To give up sincerity in order to create a good society, is
to try to build a good society by giving up immediately, from the beginning,
the essence of a good society (!). Truthful speech is not a means towards an
end, it is the end in itself; sincere speech is what makes us human and humane.
This is crucial to understand: propaganda is not a
historical coincidence, it is a structural consequence of rationalism. If you
consider the psychological structure of our current society, it’s fair to say
that propaganda is the major guiding principle. In a remarkable way, the
pursuit of rationality during the tradition of Enlightenment didn’t lead to
more Truthful speech, as the founding fathers of this tradition believed.
Science would replace questionable religious and other myths; society would finally
be organized according to reliable information instead of subjective
conjectures. Now, a few centuries later, this turned out to be an illusion.
There has never been as much unreliable information as now in public space.
The materialist-rationalist view on man and the world, in a
strange way, rather led to the opposite of what it expected. As soon as we
started to conceive the human being as a mechanistic, biological entity, for
whom the highest attainable goal was survival, it became rather unfashionable
to try to speak the Truth. Speaking the Truth, the Ancient Greeks knew that
very well, doesn’t maximize your chances on survival. The Truth is always risky.
‘No one is hated more than he who speaks the Truth’, Plato said. Hence, within
a materialist-rationalist tradition, speaking the Truth is something stupid to
do. Only idiots do it. That’s how the fanatic pursuit of rationality led us
astray, straight into the dark wood of Dante, ‘where the right road is
wholly lost and gone’.
This materialist-rationalist view on man and the world – why
do we actually cling to it? It loves to present itself as the scientific view
on man and the world. Let me tell you that this is nonsense. All seminal
scientist concluded exactly the opposite: in the end, the essence of life
always escapes rationality, it transcends the categories of rational thinking.
To name only one major scientist: in the preface of a book of Max Planck,
Einstein claimed that it is a mistake to believe that science originates from
supreme logical-rational thinking; it originates from what he called a capacity
for ‘einfühlung’ in the object one investigates, which means as much as ‘a
capacity to empathically resonate with the object you are investigating’.
Rationality is a good thing and we need to walk the path of
rationality as far as possible, but it is not the end goal. Rational knowledge
is not a goal in itself; it is a stairway to a kind of knowledge that
transcends rationality, a resonating knowledge, the kind of supreme intuition
the martial arts of the Samurai culture aimed for throughout their technical
training. It is at that level that we can situate the phenomenon of Truth.
This brings us closer to an answer to the question: what is
the remedy to the disease of totalitarianism? Can we do something about
totalitarianism? My answer is simple and straight: yes. The powerless do have
power.
Propaganda induced mass formation is a fake, symptomatic
solution for loneliness. And the real solution lies in the Art of Sincere
Speech. My next book, which I am writing now, is all about the psychology of
Truth. Truth, by definition, from a psychological point of view, is resonating
speech, it is speech which connects people, from core to core, from soul to
soul, speech that penetrates through the veil of appearances, through the ideal
images we hide behind, the imaginary shells we seek refuge in, and reconnects
the shivering and disconnected soul of one human being to that of another human
being.
Here we observe something crucial: sincere speech is the
real cure for loneliness – it reconnects people. As such, it takes away the
root cause of the major symptom of our rationalist culture – mass formation and
totalitarianism. And at the same time, sincere speech also inhibits this
symptom in a more straightforward way. It is well known that, if there are some
people who continue to speak in a sincere way when mass formation is emerging,
the masses do not go to the ultimate stage where they start to think it is
their duty to destroy each and everyone who doesn’t follow the totalitarian
ideology.
At every moment we chose to speak out in a sincere way, no
matter where this happens, in a newspaper or a television interview, but
equally well in the presence of only one other person at the kitchen table or
in the supermarket, we help to cure society from the disease of
totalitarianism.
You have to take this literally. Society, as a psychological
system, is a complex dynamical system. And complex dynamical systems have the
fascinating characteristic of so-called sensitivity to initial conditions. To
put it simple: the smallest changes in one minor detail of the system, affect
the entire system. For instance, the smallest change in the vibration pattern
of one water molecule in a boiling pot of water, changes the entire convection
pattern of the boiling water.
Nobody is powerless. And hence, every single one of us is
responsible. Each and everyone who speaks a sincere word and succeeds in truly
connecting as a human being to another human being, in particular a human being
with a different opinion, deserves to be mentioned in the books of history,
much more than a president or a minister who engages in propaganda and fails to
show the courage to speak sincerely.
The more I study the effects of speech on the human being
and on human living together, the more hopeful I become and the more I see that
we will overcome totalitarianism.
We shouldn’t be naïve when we talk about the Truth. Endless
are the atrocities in history committed by people who believed they possessed
the Truth. Truth is an elusive phenomenon; we can enjoy its presence from time
to time, but we can never claim it or possess it.
Sincere speech is an art. An art we have to learn step by
step. An art we can progressively master. That’s exactly why I started
workshops on the Art of Speech – workshops in which we practice that art in the
same perseverant, disciplined way as any other art is practiced.
Practicing this art implies that we overcome our own fanatic
convictions, and even more, our own narcissism and ego. Truth speech is this
kind of speech which penetrates through what I call ‘the veil of appearances’.
To practice it, you have to be willing to sacrifice your ideal image; your
public reputation. That is exactly what the Parrhesia in
Ancient Greek culture meant: speaking out, even if you know that those who find
their stronghold in the world of appearances will target you.
Truth-telling can make you lose something. That is for sure.
But it also gives you something. To be more psychologically precise: Truth
speech makes you lose something at the level of the Ego and win something at
the level of the soul. I am quite fascinated by the way in which sincere speech
leads to psychological strength.
I think Mahatma Gandhi provides us with a splendid
historical example. A few years ago, I started to read his autobiography. I did
so at the moment I started to realize that the only efficient resistance
against totalitarianism is non-violent resistance. Of course this only applies
to internal resistance, resistance from within the totalitarian system.
External enemies can destroy totalitarian systems from without. That’s for
sure.
But internal resistance, as I mentioned, can only be
successful if it is non-violent in nature. All violent resistance will rather
speed up the process of totalitarization, just because it is always used by the
totalitarian leaders to create support in the masses to destroy each and
everyone who goes against the system. Once I realized that, I became interested
in what Gandhi had to say in his autobiography.
I was happily surprised to see the title: Experiments
on Truth. And from the first pages, I learned that for Gandhi, the core and
essence of non-violent resistance is sincere speech. His entire life, Gandi
tried to improve the sincerity of his speech. He did so in a simple, almost
childish and naïve way, wondering every evening how sincere he had spoken that
day, where he had lied or when he could have spoken more accurately or
sincerely.
And here is something important: in the beginning of his
biography, Gandhi mentions something magnificent. He says: I actually had no
major talents. I was not handsome as a man, I didn’t have much physical
strength, I was not intelligent at school, I was not a good writer and I was
not talented as a speaker. But he had this passion for sincerity and Truth. And
this man, devoid of any major talents, but with a passion for sincere speech,
this man did something even the strongest army in the world couldn’t do: he
kicked out the English of India.
The better you start to see the almost endless horizon of
possibilities offered by speech, the more you realize: it are words that rule
the world. The human being can use words in a manipulative way, as pure
rhetoric, indoctrination, propaganda, or brain-washing trying to convince the
Other of something it doesn’t believe in itself. Or it can use words in a
sincere way, trying to convey something to a fellow human being it feels inside
itself. That is the most fundamental and existential choice human beings face:
to use words in one or the other way.
Dear politicians of Romania and abroad, this is what I want
to tell you today: it’s time for a metaphysical revolution. And you are ought
to play a major role in it. The series of crises our society goes through are
nothing else than a metaphysical revolution, which, essentially, boils down to
this: the switch from a society that functions according to the propaganda
principle to a society that is oriented towards Truth. We need a new political
culture, a culture that re-appreciates the value of Truth Telling. We need a
new political discourse, a political discourse that leaves the shallow, hollow
rhetorics and propaganda behind and speaks from the soul, from the heart; we
need politicians to become true leaders again, leaders who lead rather than
mis-lead the population.
^^^^^
Transcript of Speech
Dr. Mattias Desmet (00:12):
Some of you might know me. I wrote this book titled The
Psychology of Totalitarianism, a book in which I warned about two years ago
that we have seen the collapse of fascist and Nazi totalitarianism in the 20th
century, but that we might be at risk of ending up in a new kind of
totalitarianism now, which is technocratic in nature, technocratic
totalitarianism. I'm sure I'm telling nothing new to the people here, but for
some other people this was quite shocking. Meanwhile, they banned my book at
the Ghent University where I work as a professor from using it in my classes.
So it's a little bit strange to ban a book on... In which there is one for
totalitarianism at the university, but they did so.
(01:05):
Well, I will tell you in a nutshell what my final analysis
was on totalitarianism. I concluded in my book that totalitarianism ultimately
is rooted in our materialist rationalist view on man and the world, which
emerged or became dominant in our society about two centuries ago, and which
put in motion at least two processes, one at the level of the elite and one at
the level of the population. The new elite that emerged starting from the
French Revolution onwards, I think made excessive use of propaganda to keep
control over society. And throughout the last 200 years, propaganda became ever
and always more important for the elite to steer society, to keep control of
the population. And you can explain that which I won't do now.
(02:10):
But in a psychological way, this is a straightforward
consequence of a rationalist view on man in the world, I think the fact that
the elite used more and more propaganda. And at the same time at least as
important, was that there was a very strange evolution at the level of the
population, the psychology of the population. Throughout the last few hundreds
of years, more and more people started to feel lonely. They started to feel
disconnected, disconnected from their fellow human beings and disconnected from
their social environment. And the combination of the two, the emergence of an
elite which used more and more propaganda and the emergence of a lonely
population reinforced each other in a strange way. The lonely state, if a
population is in a lonely state, then she is extremely vulnerable for
propaganda.
(03:07):
So we had on the one hand, an elite who used more and more
propaganda, who relied more and more on propaganda to keep control in the
population, which became more and more vulnerable to it. And it was this
combination of this elite and this population that led to what Hannah Arendt
called the diabolic pact between the masses and the elite, the diabolic pact
that ended up in the emergence of a completely new kind of state in the 20th
century, the totalitarian state. That's in a nutshell my analysis of the problem
we find ourselves in now. And at the moment, I'm writing a new book in which I
do not so much focus on the problem, but in which I try to focus on the
solution.
(03:54):
Can we do something about it? Can we do something about this
emergent totalitarianism? I think we can. I really believe we can. And the
longer I think about it, the more convinced I am that we can and that we shall
find a solution. I think to put it in a nutshell, very concisely,
totalitarianism in the first place is a psychological problem. It's a
psychological problem and the solution at a psychological level for
totalitarianism is the rediscovery and the reappreciation in our culture, which
is sick of propaganda, this new kind of lie that emerged about two centuries
ago. Before the French Revolution, there was no such thing as propaganda as we
know it now. Well, the solution for the disease of this society in a certain
way, it's very logical, is the rediscovery and the reappreciation of what I
call truth-telling, true-speech, sincere-speech. My new book is about the
psychology of truth, psychology of sincere-speech, and you can clearly see that
truth-speech in the first place is resonating speech.
(05:00):
It's a kind of speech that connects people from soul to
soul, from core to core. I will describe this in a very technical and concrete
manner in my new book. So in this way you can see two things. If you consider
mass formation and totalitarianism to be the ultimate symptom of our
enlightenment tradition, the ideology of reason, of our rationalist view on men
in the world, then you can see that truth-speech or sincere-speech both
inhibits the symptom and takes away the root cause of the symptom. And there's
a respect that it's well known since the 19th century that if a mass formation,
the crowd formation emerges in a society. And there are people, there are some
people who continue to speak in a sincere way and they will usually not succeed
in waking up the masses, but they will make sure that the masses don't go to
this ultimate stage where they start to be convinced that they have to destroy
and eliminate each and every one who doesn't go along with them.
(06:06):
That's the first thing. Sincere-speech, you can understand
that logically and you can prove it empirically inhibits the symptom, it
inhibits mass formation. And at the same time, true-speech as a kind of
resonating speech, as a kind of connecting speech takes away is the real
solution for the root cause of the problem, namely the loneliness. True-speech,
sincere-speech is what really connects people to each other. Mass formation in
the first place seems to take away the loneliness. Lonely people become sensitive
and vulnerable for mass formation because as soon as they start to belong to a
mass, they feel not lonely anymore. But that's an illusion.
(06:53):
A mass is a group that is formed not because individuals
connect to each other, but because they all connect to a collective ideal. And
the longer the mass formation exists, the more solidarity is sucked away from
the relationship between individuals and injected in the relationship between
the individual and the collective, meaning that in the end people feel much,
much more love and solidarity for the collective than for other individuals.
And in the final stage, this leads to this jarring situation in which parents
start to report their children to the state. And the other way around, children
start to report their parents to the state just because even the solidarity
with their parents becomes less strong than the solidarity with the collective.
So you can understand that perfectly if you understand the psychological
mechanism of mass formation.
(07:49):
I think that the better you understand the psychological
mechanisms involved, the better you see that truth-speech or sincere-speech
indeed is the solution and that we are all responsible for contributing to the
solution to the problem of totalitarianism. Society as a psychological system
is always is a complex dynamical system, literally. And complex dynamical
systems in nature always have this fascinating characteristic of sensitivity to
initial conditions, meaning that at a small change in a minor detail of the
system has an impact on the entire system. For instance, a small change in the
vibration pattern of one water molecule changes the entire convection pattern
in a boiling pot of water. And in the same way, a minor sincere word spoken
will have an impact on the entire society.
(08:51):
So we all have the responsibility to speak out and no matter
where. We can do it in a television program, in a newspaper, but also at the
kitchen table and in the supermarket. Also there, we will have an impact on the
entire system. We can all contribute to the solution. We shouldn't feel
powerless. We all have power and that makes us all responsible. We should all
do our best no matter where we are to speak out in a sincere way and maybe to
really try to learn the art of truth-speech. I don't think we should think in a
naive way about truth. Thinking in a naive way about truth has caused a lot of
trouble in this world, I think. Truth is something elusive, something that we
can be in the presence of for a moment, but that we can never possess.
Truth-speech is an art, an art we can learn and we should try to learn it
because I think it's the only way out of totalitarianism. If you want to... One
of the best examples, I think one of the most inspiring examples at that level
is Mahatma Gandhi, I think.
(10:00):
A few years ago I started to be interested in nonviolent
resistance because I know that resistance inside of a totalitarian system can
only be successful if it is nonviolent. That's something very typical for
resistance against totalitarian systems. And that's why I started to read the
autobiography of Mahatma Gandhi. And the first thing I learned there was that
Mahatma Gandhi considered sincere-speech to be the core and the essence of
nonviolent resistance. And he mentioned something wonderful in the introduction
of his book. He says, "I had no major talents at all. I was not handsome,
I was not physically strong, I was not intelligent at school. I was not a good
writer and I was not a good speaker, but I had this passion for
truth-speech," He said, for sincere-speech. And time and time again, day
after day, he tried to become more honest and more sincere every evening,
admitting for himself. If he lied that day or if he could have been spoken in a
more sincere way, then he did.
(11:01):
And in this way, this man, without any great talent became
the most powerful man of India. He did something that even the strongest army
in the world couldn't do at that moment. He kicked out the English of India and
that's what we can do as well. Even a small minority of us is sufficient if we
are determined and dedicated to truth and to sincerity, to break the power of
the most impressive propaganda system the world have ever seen. We can and will
and must do it. I think there are very hopeful historical examples of
minorities, of people who changed the world, who changed the world.
(11:40):
I'd like to give only one example, Friedrich Nietzsche, the
German philosopher thought that 100 people had been sufficient to change
medieval society in the society of the Renaissance. The same can happen now. We
are at the verge of a big metaphysical revolution, I think to use a concept of
Michel Houellebecq. A revolution, which in the end boils down to this. We have
to change from a society which is based on the organizing principle of
propaganda, to society which is based on the organizing principle of sincerity.
And I think each and every one of us who is here can contribute to it. And I
hope we will all do so. Thanks.
© 2023 Robert
W Malone, MD
Who is Robert
Malone HOMEPAGE
SUPPORT/SUBSCRIBE
to Who is Robert Malone
++++++++++++++++++++
DailyClout Wholly Erased All at Once from Facebook,
Instagram; Users Receive Threatening Messages
A Massive Censorship Attack on Us -- One Day after my
@WarRoom Interview Explaining mRNA Vaccine-Caused "Frameshifting" has
720,000 Views
December 11, 2023
DailyClout contributors and readers discovered yesterday,
Dec 10, 2023, that Facebook has removed all of DailyClout’s content, both
articles and videos, or marked it all as Spam. This scorched-earth erasure was
applied to DailyClout — and to my own — content, posted as far back as
September 2022.
Facebook also blocked readers from sharing DailyClout
content, and the platform told readers and contributors that they were
violating Facebook’s terms of service if they shared our posts. Users get
messages warning them of various terms of service violations that include
“terrorism”.
RiaDelRio X-Tweet about DailyClout Censored
In the case of Instagram, not only were our contributors’
accounts restricted, but the word ‘DailyClout’ itself was deleted from their
bios, though they had taken no such action.
We know from lawsuits by two US Attorneys General that the
White House and CDC already pressured Facebook to censor accurate information
I’d posted in 2021, related to menstrual damage from
mRNA vaccines. I was blocked from Facebook intermittently for
months after that. Due to these prior acts of censorship by Facebook, millions
of women have been prevented from learning about potential damage to their
bodies and to their fertility — damage which they now suffer as a result of
that suppression.
Facebook’s and Instagram’s censorship of DailyClout — and of
me personally — yesterday followed my posting of an interview I did with Steve
Bannon on his widely viewed podcast WarRoom, in which I explained that
scientists had confirmed that the mRNA injections cause ‘frameshifting’, or the
production of ‘nonsense’ proteins, with unknown outcomes. It reached 720,000
views on Twitter. (I cannot open it on Rumble).
https://twitter.com/naomirwolf/status/1733508874412401111
[Dr Naomi Wolf X-Tweet Screengrab 12/9/23]
[Blog Editor: I’m showing the Rumble video referenced I the
Tweet. Rumble was the victim of a CCP-cyber attack which might explain the
reason Dr. Wolf could not open the Rumble
video on 12/11. Rumble seems to have overcome the attack BUT the embed
function isn’t working. So here’s the Bitchute version of Bannons War Room:
Bitchute VIDEO: DR. NAOMI WOLF: "THE INJECTIONS HAVE AN INGREDIENT IN THEM THAT IS CAUSING FRAMESHIFTING"
Posted by Steve Bannon's War Room
First Published December 8, 2023
23:00 UTC
My sources were a December 6 2023 article in the
peer-reviewed journal Nature.com, “N1-Methylpseudouridylation
of mRNA Causes +1 Ribosomal Frameshifting,” (Thomas
E Mulroney, et al), as well as an earlier report by the WarRoom/DailyClout
Pfizer Documents Research Team. The sources for that report
were the Pfizer internal documents released by the FDA under court order. On
May 11, 2022, DailyClout had published “Report
22: Effects of N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine in the Pfizer MRNA Vaccine,” linking
drectly to the Pfizer documents.
My reporting is, once again, correct, and once again, the
censored finding, this time of N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine causing protein-related
problems, is a matter of public interest.
Though much of the documentation of this that was abundant
online a year ago has been scrubbed (I reported on it in my previous book The
Bodies of Others) — the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation invested in the mRNA
vaccines discovery process. Indeed, their list of “COVID-19 Partners” shows
Mark Zuckerberg’s investment in and his profiting from every aspect of
“lockdowns”; testing and pharmaceutical treatment of COVID; from pumping
millions into “partnering” on distance learning and internet connectivity for homebound
children, to developing COVID treatments, including vaccines; to the “Chan
Zuckerberg Biohub” for COVID testing.
If you want to know exactly how the world was “locked down”,
profitably tested, profitably distanced, profitably vaccinated, and in the
meantime had its DNA harvested — if you want to know who got paid to keep your
child home from school for between one and two years of your child’s life, and
who paid for those “distancing” educators — look no further than at the
“COVID-19 Partners” of “CZI”: https://chanzuckerberg.com/covid-19/partners/.
These “Partners” also include those at the center of the catastrophic mRNA
vaccine rollout: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Institute
and the WHO. “Mark Zuckerberg’s Bid to Get America Vaccinated,” as the Wall
Street Journal put it, also profited his own
investments.
My interview with Steve Bannon reveals one the massive
potentially criminal result of this undertaking, which Zuckerberg had so
heavily helped to fund and promote.
If Mark Zuckerberg’s vaccine investment has helped to
produce a process that has gone terribly wrong, the way to address that is by
full public disclosure and informed consent for Facebook’s billions of users;
and not by censoring journalists who are bringing peer-reviewed findings to his
platforms.
This action on Zuckerberg’s part — censoring me and
DailyClout, and wiping out over a year of our content, and intimidating any
user who types in my or DailyClout’s name — damages my company, its
shareholders and its advertisers. It also harms our columnists, whose alliance
with DailyClout has led to their other business interests being restricted on
Zuckerberg’s platforms.
He will hear from our lawyers.
If Mark Zuckerberg has harmed his users by censoring what
are now confirmed to be serious and widespread risks from an mRNA vaccine
process in the development of which he invested, he should say so, apologize,
and offer to pay his users’ medical bills; rather than doubling down and
seeking to prevent Facebook and Instagram users from finding out what was done
to them.
I hope Facebook’s own users and advertisers consider now
whether they wish to align with a brand that shows so little regard for its own
customers’ health and wellbeing, and so little respect for accuracy, and that
is so willing to misinform its own users, in a way that can injure them, or
worse.
The thing is, censorship never works. I have been privileged
to study the history of censorship, and sooner or later, the truth always comes
out. Discussion of discussion of what became Protestantism itself was once
censored; discussion of homosexuality was once heavily censored; so was any
discussion of birth control. None of that censorship prevented any of these
subjects from eventually coming to light.
Mr. Zuckerberg’s potential crimes will not stay hidden, just
because he has sought to silence me and the posts and videos created by my
company. His potential crimes will only, sadly, thus be compounded.
To support us, and
our censorship suit now against Facebook, and to defend our last freedoms of
speech, subscribe to Best of
DailyClout now open on Substack, subscribe to DailyClout.io, use our Facebook
alternative Communities, and please
donate.
© 2023 Dr
Naomi Wolf
Outspoken with Dr
Naomi Wolf HOMEPAGE
SUBCRIBE/SUPPORT
Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf
++++++++++++++++++++++++
How to Demoralize a Nation
By LILY
December 11, 2023
[Blog Editor: I uploaded this clip from the A Lily Bit
Substack:]
Bitchute VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov Warning - A Lily Bit
[Posted by SlantRight2
First Published December 12th,
2023 19:12 UTC
In my earlier articles, I often delved into the notion that
the aviation industry is facing systemic challenges, leading to a gradual
discouragement of flying among the general public. This topic, covered in various
articles, includes the idea of potential restrictions on purchasing
plane tickets. According to this perspective, only those with a positive
environmental track record or deemed 'good citizens' might be eligible to buy
flight tickets in the future. While many view this as an unwarranted concern,
it's a topic that has been increasingly discussed in relation to environmental
policies and their impact on air travel.
Considering the gradual recovery of the aviation industry
and the consistent rise in demand, it's not unexpected that mainstream media is
once again bringing attention to the concept of CO2-passports:
Recently, an article titled “It's
Time to Limit the Frequency of Our Trips Abroad - 'CO2 Passports' Might Be the
Answer” was published by CNN. The content mirrors the nightmare
scenario I once discussed. The article, written by guest commentator Ross
Bennett-Cook, a visiting lecturer at the University of Westminster's School of
Architecture Cities, proposes the idea of a CO2 passport. This concept involves
allocating an annual CO2 limit to each traveler, which they must not exceed.
Bennett-Cook suggests that this system could be used to 'ration' travel.
“The detrimental impact of tourism on the environment is so
significant that some believe drastic changes in our travel habits are
inevitable,” writes the visiting lecturer. He refers to a 2023 report on the
future of sustainable travel, where the tour operator Intrepid Travel suggests
that 'CO2 Passports' might soon become a necessity for the survival of the
tourism industry. The fact that a tour operator is proposing such coercive
measures for its customers indicates how entire sectors, driven by fear of being
perceived as non-progressive or not acting in accordance with the World
Economic Forum's playbook, are resorting to self-limiting strategies in the
hope of avoiding complete cancellation.
Bennett-Cook calculates, “Globally, the average annual CO2
footprint per person is around 4 tons. To prevent global temperatures from
rising more than two degrees Celsius, the average global CO2 footprint needs to
be reduced to below two tons by 2050.” This reduction is equivalent to two
round trips between London and New York. However, the push for change isn't
limited to air travel. He notes that cruise ships emit four times more sulfur
gases than all of Europe's 291 million cars combined, contributing to acid rain
and respiratory diseases. Bennett-Cook warns that vacationers should prepare to
modify their travel habits voluntarily before such changes are imposed.
While CNN clarifies that this is an opinion piece and does
not necessarily reflect the editorial stance, those aware of the network's
climate-conscious and progressive reputation might view this statement with
skepticism.
On MSN, the “news” portal owned by Bill Gates' Microsoft,
similar thoughts are being echoed, also referencing the report from the tour
operator. An article there poses the question, “Could
there be 'CO2 Passports' in the future that restrict our travel allowance?”
It goes on to explain, “Theoretically, a CO2 Passport would limit the annual
greenhouse gas emissions of travelers.” The article also quotes Alex Hawkins,
an editor for strategic future studies at The Future Laboratory, who led the
report. Speaking to Business Insider, Hawkins suggested that the concept might
become necessary if we fail to work towards a more sustainable world. “The idea
of CO2 Passports is based on the notion of personal CO2 certificates,” said
Hawkins, adding that this would set a cap on how much CO2 individuals can emit
over a certain period.
.jpg)
Great Reset Marxism (A Lily Bit Photo)
These are communist ideas. I delved into the Soviet Union's
long-term strategy before, which was believed to have been conceived by
Gorbachev's political mentor, former KGB and later Party leader Yuri Andropov.
This strategy aimed to infiltrate and internally dismantle capitalism.
Environmental protection, alongside the peace movement, was reportedly one of
the Trojan horses the KGB relied on, as defectors have claimed. If one were
looking for a lever to shake the foundations of Western industrial society, manipulating
the cost of CO2 emissions would have been an ideal tactic, given its integral
role in our industry and prosperity.
While I'm skeptical that Andropov's plan has been
implemented to the letter, it's evident that the seeds planted by the KGB at
that time have taken on a life of their own and flourished. Regardless of how
much, if any, of Andropov's ideology is embedded in current climate policies,
the former Party leader might be metaphorically celebrating the developments.
The same goes for the still very much active Communists in China. Concepts like
the “CO2 Passport” – and many others – align closely with the spirit of
communism, or more precisely, with systems that oppress and patronize people.
Youtube VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov: Psychological
Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society (Complete)
Posted on Feb 23, 2011
Yuri Bezmenov (alias Tomas
Schuman), a Soviet KGB defector, explains in detail his scheme for the KGB
process of subversion and takeover of target societies at a lecture in Los
Angeles, 1983.
Yuri Bezmenov was a former KGB
propagandist who was assigned to New Dehli, India - and defected to the West in
1970.
Bezmenov explains his background,
some of his training, and exactly how Soviet propaganda is spread in other
countries in order to subvert their teachers, politicians, and other policy
makers to a mindset receptive to the Soviet ideology.
He also explains in detail the goal
of Soviet propaganda as total subversion of another country and the four-step
formula for achieving this goal.
He recalls the details of how he
escaped India, defected to the West, and settled in Montreal as an announcer
for the CBC.
Note the segments starting at
around 14 and 24 minutes into the video.
Please mirror this video! Thank
you.
The communist strategy involved infiltrating universities
and then penetrating institutions. KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov notably
highlighted that “ideological subversion” was more critical for the Soviet
intelligence than traditional espionage, with the KGB dedicating 85% of its
resources to this effort. Bezmenov referred to this as “subversion” or
“Zersetzung” in German.
Bezmenov's description of the Soviet Union's long-term
strategy in the 1980s resonates with many aspects of the present day. For
example, he spoke of the power structure being gradually eroded by entities and
groups lacking both the qualifications and the public's mandate yet still
wielding power, effectively eliminating competition.
According to Bezmenov, who had worked as a propagandist for
the KGB, the goal was “to distort the perception of reality to such an extent
that despite the abundance of information, individuals are unable to draw
logical conclusions in defending themselves, their families, and their
countries.” He described this as a brainwashing process that unfolds very
slowly. The first stage is demoralization, taking 15 to 20 years – the time
needed to educate generations of students and expose them to the enemy's ideology,
in this case, Marxism. This ideology had to be ingrained in the minds of at
least three generations without being confronted by Western core values and
patriotism.
“The outcome is evident in most individuals who graduated
from universities in the 1960s,” Bezmenov stated in 1984. “They now occupy
positions of power. They are everywhere. And they are contaminated. They've
been conditioned to respond in a certain way. It's impossible to convince them
of anything, even if you prove that white is white and black is black. You
cannot change their worldview and behavior.”
Their perspective of the world, he argued, is shaped by
ideology, with facts playing no significant role. According to Bezmenov, people
who have been “demoralized” are unable to distinguish true information from
falsehood. That's why the process of demoralization is complete and
irreversible. To reverse it, you would need another 15 to 20 years to educate
new generations with a sense of patriotism and common sense, who would work in
the interest of their own country and not in the interest of an ideology.
How to
Establish A Technocracy – 11/13/23
Currently, we are in the midst
of a Great Mental Reset, essential for the lasting acceptance of the world as
it emerges from the Great Reset. In contrast, the system in Huxley's “Brave New
World” is already established and stable. It's beneficial for us to examine in
detail how this was achieved in…Read full
story
According to the KGB defector, the demoralization in America
had been more successful than even KGB Chief Andropov could have imagined:
“Much of it was self-inflicted by the Americans due to a lack of moral
standards.” In other words, the crony capitalist system was more decayed than
even Moscow had anticipated.
Bezmenov pointed out the significant role of film and
television in this “brainwashing” process. He observed, “If you compare movies
from the last 20 to 25 years, new films often portray police officers as dumb,
aggressive, psychotic, or paranoid. On the other hand, criminals are depicted
as nice. They might smoke hashish or inject drugs, but they are fundamentally
shown as nice, creative people, unproductive only because society oppresses
them. Meanwhile, a Pentagon general is invariably a stupid, war-hungry maniac.
A police officer is presented as a pig, who is rude and abuses his power.”
The goal, according to Bezmenov, was to foster hatred and
distrust towards those who protect citizens and enforce law and order. Moral
relativism was a key tool in this long-term strategy. It blurred the lines
between good and evil, convincing people that everyone was the same everywhere.
Language manipulation was also part of this process, slowly replacing
fundamental moral principles so that a criminal was no longer a criminal, but
rather a defendant.
A key aim of the brainwashing tactics was to instill in
people the false notion that all humans are equal: “We, Soviet propagandists,
try to push you further in the direction you are already heading. 'Equality,
yes! Equality! People are equal!'“ Bezmenov emphasized that there was a
deliberate confusion between the concept of equal opportunity, which is
positive and necessary, and equality, which actually leads to uniformity.
This strategy extended even to the family unit: “The goal is
to destabilize relationships even within families. We're witnessing a
radicalization of interpersonal relations. No more compromises! Just fight,
fight, fight! The normal, traditionally accepted relationships are being
destabilized.”
Bezmenov warned that when socialist uniformity eventually
destroys society, a great disillusionment will set in. There will be dissidents
and the discontented, but a de facto socialist regime will not tolerate these
voices of opposition, unlike the America of 1984.
While I don't necessarily view the World Economic Forum led
by Klaus Schwab as a product of the Soviet long-term strategy, it certainly
aligns well with it. This is also true for the concept of the “Great Reset”
championed by Schwab & Co. today. The Soviet dissident and expert on the
communist system, Vladimir Bukovsky, criticized the European Union as a
bureaucratic behemoth, likening it to a new Soviet Union. A few years ago, I
found his criticism to be exaggerated. Today, unfortunately, I find many of his
points more understandable. Something that is very much true for the US, as
well.
The Soviet Union would be celebrating its 101st anniversary
at the end of this month. Its founding spirit, it seems, continues to live on.
If you
appreciate my articles, please consider giving them a like. It's a simple
gesture that doesn't cost you anything, but it goes a long way in promoting
this post, combating censorship, and fighting the issues that you are
apparently not a big fan of.
© 2023 Substack
Inc
A Lily Bit HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT
A Lily Bit
No comments:
Post a Comment