John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© May 19, 2023
The MSM propagandists continue to promote Great Reset agenda as the great thing for human progress. BUT REALLY it’s the next design to limit
human existence for whatever benefits the few as in a minority of wealthy
Leftists and their designs to rule. Their rule was evidenced as possible via
through the CCP-virus (aka COVID) restrictions (LYING SCIENCE) and Climate
Hysteria (MORE LYING SCIENCE).
I suspect the hysteria to keep an imperfect billionaire –
DONALD TRUMP – from re-acquiring POTUS is related to his support of
Nation-State sovereignty opposing Globalist One-World Government control. For
sure there is much THE DONALD has supported (e.g. the
Jab and an international economic agreement he believes supported
America First but
really had the long term potential to promote Corporatist Globalism),
NEVERTHELESS the Dem-Marxist
and Globalist hatred of legit President Trump makes him at the very
least a symbol of RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY.
There is a Globalist Tyranny spreading across the planet worse
than any virus that seeks the end of Liberty of individuals and sovereign
nations. If you are a SyFy fan you might recognize WEF Globalists acting like
the Borg telling you to comply because RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.
I AM HERE TO TELL YOU assimilation to WEF brainwashing is up
to each individual. The ONLY collective We The People should join is to
collectively RESIST. DO NOT COMPLY to abandoning your Liberty no matter how
many schmoozing lies vainly tell you that it is for your own good.
So now … BECOME INFORMED!
o The
Great Reset is not about achieving their dystopia it’s about creating massive
chaos which would put them in charge; By RHODA WILSON; THE EXPOSÉ; 5/18/23
o Cyborg
Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion: and the Implications for the
Future of the DoD (a DoD report, 2019); By ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS; (Substack)
Who is Robert Malone;
5/17/23
JRH 5/19/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store
(please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
****************************
The Great Reset is not about achieving their dystopia
it’s about creating massive chaos which would put them in charge
.jpg)
Klaus Schwab & Prince Chuck (now King Chuck) (The Exposé photo) - Featured image: Klaus Schwab and Prince Charles on why we need a Great Reset, World Economic Forum, 4 June 2020
By RHODA WILSON
May 18, 2023
The Great Reset is a multi-prong attack. “It was decades
of trends that led to this. And our whole climate debate now is no longer in
the democratic realm – at least they’re pushing it to keep it out of the
democratic realm,” Mark Morano said.
In March 2020 our entire climate/energy debate changed.
Probably forever. It accelerated a lot of trends. What happened in March 2020,
essentially, was the bypassing of democracy for covid regulations. And, as
World Economic Forum’s Klaus Schwab, co-author of the book ‘Covid-19:
The Great Reset’, threatened in June 2020: “The pandemic represents
a rare but narrow opportunity to reflect, reimagine and reset our world.”
Marc Morano was one of the 50 top scientists and experts who
gave a talk at The Heartland Institute’s 15th International Conference on
Climate Change (“ICCC15”) held on 25 February 2023. You can find all ICCC15
presentations HERE.
Morano is the founder and publisher of CFACT’s Climate Depot and is the
author of the 2021 book ‘Green
Fraud: Why the Green New Deal Is Even Worse Than You Think’.
“[In] my book,” Morano told the ICCC15 audience, “I go through the whole
concept of The Great Reset / World Economic Forum.”
His talk, embedded at the end of this article, is based on
articles published by corporate media and “their” documented evidence. He used
these reports to expose the true nature of The Great Reset. In short, The Great
Reset isn’t a gradual shift to improve the lives of the masses. It’s a massive
power grab by a select few who believe they should determine how society works
on a global scale.
In the quote above, Schwab is referring to “transforming”
every country to be subject to WEF’s “stakeholder capitalism.” Under
WEF’s stakeholder capitalism, a business isn’t evaluated on whether it’s
profitable or whether you get a return on your money, Morano said. “It’s all
about whether you [ ] meet woke principles of equity, diversity, inclusion,
climate [and] environmental goals.”
Morano summarised six aspects of the “new normal” being imposed
on the world as part of The Great Reset:
1. Our free speech rights and
currency are being collapsed by government and corporate collusion.
2. Our current energy system is
being intentionally collapsed through the net zero utopian vision.
3. Our transportation is being
intentionally collapsed and our freedom of movement is being stripped away.
4. Our ability to own property –
home and motor vehicles – is being intentionally collapsed.
5. Our high-yield agriculture
system is being intentionally collapsed to create man-made food shortages and
chaos.
6. Our ability to choose to eat
meat is being banned to create demand for us to eat “lab-grown” fake meat and
insects.
This is the intentional collapse of modern society, he said.
“It’s not really about [them] achieving their utopian vision – whether it’s on
energy or the ideal number of people – it’s about creating a massive amount of
chaos which would then put them in charge of this chaos.”
“Once they create a food shortage – we’ve been warned by Al
Gore and the United Nations and people like James Hansen – ‘Climate will cause
great food disruption’. No. The climate policies will cause
great food disruption. And so, once their policies cause this disruption, the
intentional collapse, then they get even more power and do more of the same
policies and that, make no mistake, is how they’re going to get us this chaos
and shortages.”
Stuart Chase Quotes - New Deal & Soviets - “Why should Russians have all the fun remaking the world”
A
New Deal, Stuart Chase, 1932, pg. 252
In 1932, Stuart Chase published ‘A
New Deal’. His book concluded: “Why should Russians have all
the fun remaking the world.” His book was written at the time when The
New York Times was praising Joseph Stalin for his land reforms and
agricultural revolution. So, what Chase means by having fun is “this vision of
this ruling class elite being able to manage and plan and micromanage every
aspect of your life – the administrative state – that’s fun for these guys,”
Morano said.
Related: Spinning Mass Murder,
Maggie Duranty
Adding, “in every era of history, the ruling class has tried
to invent ways in which to make the rest of us lose our freedom. And they want
to make us happy that we’re losing our freedom. ‘It’s for our own good, we’re
protecting you from whether it’s even terrorism or the climate or the
environment or food shortages or is this chaos we’ll protect you. You just have
to give up your freedom’. And covid was the exact example of that.”
They didn’t achieve their goals as set out in Chase’s book
in decades past. “But this has been their goal. So they wait, lie in waiting.
They wait for that crisis,” Morano explained.
Using a series of corporate media articles and journals,
Morano demonstrated how the “elites” have used the pandemic and climate change
“crises” to further their goals. For example, they praised the one-party state
system in China as a role model that should be emulated. All this while
enriching themselves.
Covid enabled the largest transfer of wealth ever, US$3.7
trillion, from low- and middle-class-income people to billionaires, Morano
said. “The pandemic created a new billionaire every 30 hours” while workers
faced extreme poverty.
Morano spent a little more time speaking about Bill Gates.
Aside from China, Australia had probably the most authoritarian response to the
pandemic. Gates
said that “if every country does what Australia did,” the
world could prevent the next pandemic. Why do we care what Bill Gates thinks?
“Because this man [gives] tens of millions of dollars to the
media, buys his own media and. most importantly. he is the number two donor to
the World Health Organisation which is [now] seeking a Pandemic treaty.
Bill Gates, next to the United States government, owns the World Health
Organisation,” Morano said.
Climate Morphs to COVID/Reset – Robert S Lindzen
Everything we’ve heard in the climate debate has already
been used for covid. For example, the demonisation of climate sceptics is the
same as the
demonisation of vaccine sceptics, the idea of a permanent climate
crisis has already been done with the
idea of a covid becoming a permanent pandemic and, of course,
censorship.
Perhaps one of the most surreal copycats of the covid
response is the suggestion to add climate as a cause of death on death
certificates. Australian National University Medical School’s Arnagretta
Hunter said: “Climate change is a killer, but we don’t acknowledge
it on death certificates. If a farmer dies at the end of a five-year drought,
we know that the drought probably contributed to his death, but there is no way
to record that.”
Further reading: Great
Reset By Marc Morano – Chapter 12 Excerpt: ‘COVID Lockdowns Morph to Climate
Lockdowns’, Climate Depot
However, “climate cannot stand on its own anymore … I
believe it’s going to be climate/covid merged,” Morano said and provided
examples of reports which showed the merging of climate and covid ideologies, a
few of which we’ve noted below.
In September 2020, Prof.
Mariana Mazzucato of University College London, who coined the term “climate
lockdowns,” said: “In the near future, the world may need to resort
to lockdowns again – this time to tackle a climate emergency. Under a ‘climate
lockdown’, governments would limit private vehicle use, ban consumption of red
meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies
would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our
economic structures and do capitalism differently. Many think of the climate
crisis as distinct from the health and economic crises caused by the pandemic.
But the three crises – and their solutions – are interconnected.”
Three months later, Director of Harvard Chan C-CHANGE Dr.
Aaron Bernstein said: “We also need to take climate action to
prevent the next pandemic … Climate change alters how we relate to other
species on Earth and that matters to our health and our risk for infections …
Many of the root causes of climate change also increase the risk of pandemics.”
In September 2021, more
than 230 medical journals said climate change is the “greatest
threat” to global public health and declared that the covid “response” could be
a “template” for climate response.
Of course, none of what they claim is true. Reality destroys
their claims. We are at the stage where conspiracy realities are outnumbering
conspiracy theories. [Bold Text Emphasis is Blog Editor’s]
Youtube VIDEO: FINALLY!
The Ultimate Summary of The Great Reset - and a Call to Action! [Blog
Editor: You know a truth is involved when Youtube places a Leftist Wikipedia
favorable contrasting explanatory note on the video – which you’ll read if you
click the title embedded link.]
[Posted by Ivor Cummins
Posted on May 10, 2023
Further resources:
o Video: Marc Morano Demolishes The Great Reset
Agenda at the Heartland Institute’s 2023 Climate Conference, The
Heartland Institute, 7 March 2023 (43 mins)
o “The Great Reset” on
Climate Depot
o Heartland’s climate
issue suite
o Heartland’s latest climate
conference
o All of Heartland’s climate
conferences since 2009
o The
Environment & Climate News Podcast on Apple
o Heartland’s
Climate Change Roundtable YouTube show
THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
++++++++++++++++++++
Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion
and the Implications for the Future of the DoD (a DoD
report, 2019)
Cyborg Soldier 2050 - DOD Title screengrab
May 17, 2023
Hiding in plain site on a military website is a 2019 report
that was published by the US Army Combat capabilities Development Command
Chemical Biological Center.
“Cyborg
Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Implications for the Future of the
DOD” [42 pages]
The abstract of this report lays out it objectives:
CYBORG SOLDIER 2050: HUMAN/MACHINE FUSION AND THE
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OF THE DoD
ABSTRACT: The Office of the
Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (Alexandria, VA)
established the DOD Biotechnologies for Health and Human Performance Council
(BHPC) study group to continually assess research and development in
biotechnology…
At the direction of the BHPC
Executive Committee, the BHPC study group conducted a year-long assessment
entitled “Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Impact for the
Future of the DOD”.
The primary objective of this
effort was to forecast and evaluate the military implications of machines that
are physically integrated with the human body to augment and enhance human
performance over the next 30 years.
This report summarizes this
assessment and findings;
identifies four potential
military-use cases for new technologies in this area; and assesses their impact
upon the DOD organizational structure, warfighter doctrine and tactics, and
interoperability with U.S. allies and civil society.
In another section, the authors of the study go on:
…“our use of the term cyborg
is intended to envision a grander and fundamentally more complex future
involving human/machine technologies over the next 30 years.
The cyborg technologies
assessed in this study go beyond augmentation, which restores function from
injury or disease, and are envisioned to enhance performance through a range of
modifications from the functional to the radically structural beyond the normal
baseline for humans.
One can also assume that
aspects of cyborg capabilities will be enabled through the use of genetic
engineering, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, or any
number of emerging technologies…
The primary objectives of
this study are to predict the direction cyborg technology will take within the
next 30 years, determine how that could fundamentally impact national security,
and make recommendations to
senior DOD leadership on how to safeguard the United States and mitigate the
threat posed by near-peer exploitation of these technologies.
The four examples of human augmentation presented in this
study, which the authors feel are most likely to succeed are:
Of the four examples listed above, I found the “optogenetic
bodysuit” to be profoundly disturbing:
Restoration and Programmed
Muscular Control through an Optogenetic Bodysuit Sensor Web
Technical Description: In
this scenario, muscle control is enhanced through a network of emplaced
subcutaneous sensors that deliver optogenetic stimulation through programmed
light pulses.
This enhancement is best
described as an implanted digital sensing and stimulation system that is
coupled with external sensors (e.g., boot inserts and wearables), which are
linked to a central computational controller.
In effect, the human body would
have an array of small optical sensors implanted beneath the skin in the body
areas that need to be controlled.
These sensors could be
manifested as thin optical threads that are placed at regular intervals over
critical muscle and nerve bundles and are linked to a central control area
designed to stimulate each node only when the muscles below it are needed.
Optical control would occur across the network of optical threads in a
programmed manner to effect a fluid muscular action in a choreographed “dance.”
Such a network of implantable
muscle sensing, computation, and stimulation provides a closed-loop suite that
could be used to decrease injury and mortality rates for soldiers through
automated hazard avoidance.
The network would also enhance
their physical capabilities on the battlefield.
A “body-suit” sounds like such a nice thing, but this is
hardly a “bodysuit. This is a network of subcutaneous (implanted) - fiberoptics,
which can control the body. These implanted sensors may be linked to some sort
of exoskeleton or not.
What is “field” of Optogenetics:
Tactical employment: …
As the technology develops
toward the year 2050, optogenetic body control could help respond to the
persistent demand for warfighters to perform increasingly challenging tasks
that often push them to the limits of their physical capability. Ongoing efforts
to develop warfighter exosystems to reduce energy expenditure have revealed
that current technologies often impede operator performance and increase
metabolic costs.
An optogenetically controlled
body suit could be used to sense an individual’s condition and provide a
real-time interface between the human and the exosystem.
This human enhancement would
allow dynamic adaptive coupling of the human body with an external exosystem,
lead to physical behaviors that are more stable and agile, and optimize energy
expenditure in operational environments.
Optogenetic musculoskeletal
control systems would not only allow warfighters to interface with external
systems that are not permanently adhered to their bodies, but could also be
programmed to control their bodies to perform complex tasks for which they are
not accustomed.
The optogenetic controller
would, in effect, take control of the motions of a warfighter’s limbs, thereby
allowing a novice (i.e., the warfighter) to perform functions professionally.
In reading this, I am struck by the fact having another
person or computer control someone else’s body sounds an awfully lot like it
could be used to force people to do things against their will. Slavery is an
ugly word and yet optogenetic body control seems exactly that.
When I think about how we use livestock for ploughing or
even riding. Don’t we force them to cede control of their bodies by use of
technologies such as a harness? How is this different?
A number of concerns and questions immediately arise. Could
this technology be used to control prisoners, force recruits into a mercenary
army, be used for hazardous exercises, be controlled by a conscious artificial
intelligence?
When this technology is taken out of the context of the
military and placed into the hands of a dictatorship (or a corporation)?
The authors admit that this is a grave concern and that
there is no legal framework to currently address such questions.
Machines respond to commands,
and if command and control are hacked, the human/machine will be compromised.
Hackability by external forces could generate the fear of control by others.
Even if this risk can be mitigated through enhanced encryption methods,
variable authentication requirements, or other methods, the perception that
control could be subverted may lead to issues of trust among peers.
For example, if a hostile
actor could override an optogenetic body suit or neural implant that controls
muscle movement, this could not only create a true threat to the individual,
organization, and mission, but could promulgate fears among the ranks of
non-enhanced and enhanced individuals.
A DoD report, titled “The Soldier-Cyborg
Transformation: A Framework for Analysis of Social and Ethical Issues of Future
Warfare” which was written in 1998 shows just how long the
military has been working towards a cyborg future.
The public has been asleep. It is time to wake up and take
back control of our military, which fully intends that this technology be
developed in concert with civilian uses.
Neural enhancement (from the report):
Tactical employment: In
this scenario, neural implants for brain–computer interfacing (BCI) would allow
for seamless interaction between individuals and secondary assets (machines).
This control could be exerted upon drones, weapon systems, and other remote
systems operated by an enhanced individual. The enhancement would not simply
entail user control of equipment (brain to machine) but also transmission to
operator (machine to brain) and human to human (command and control dynamics)
to enhance situational awareness as drone, computational analytical, and human
information is relayed to the operator….
Neural enhancement through
implantation of modulatory electrodes in the brain will allow for rapid
interaction between machine and operator through a read/write type of
mechanism. These will enable more rapid and integrated control of multiple
assets by the enhanced operator, thus improving battlefield awareness and warfighter
lethality.
Brain activity will be
monitored noninvasively through electrodes placed upon the scalp or skull or
more invasively through the direct implantation of electrodes to the brain
surface or deeper structures and networks.
At present, researchers have not
been able to determine whether the implantation of electrodes is reversible or
to what extent affected neural networks adapt to the presence of an implant,
thereby complicating removal.
As this technology matures, it
is anticipated that specialized operators will be using neural implants for
enhanced operation of assets by the year 2030. These operators will include
teams from the Special Forces, military pilots, operators of unmanned aerial
vehicles (UAVs) or unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) such as drones, and
intelligence personnel. The BHPC group predicts that by the year 2050,
significant advances will be made in the understanding of the neural network
and neural implant technology.
With greater understanding, it
is anticipated there will be larger deployment of these technologies to
military forces, enabling use-controlled operation of weapon systems, network
communication and interaction (e.g., corpsmen speaking with doctors or
specialists in hospitals to aid in field treatment of combat injuries), and
improved warfighter awareness through machine to brain (and machine-enabled
remote brain to brain) communication via the use of distributed sensors,
transmitters, and reconnaissance drones.
I have written about brain
computer interfaces previously. That these can include both
non-invasive as well as invasive interventions opens up a host of questions and
concerns. Again, the bioethical issues are vast. Including the ability for
someone to lose control of their own mind.
A early case example of how these types of technologies can
be weaponized –
The Havana Syndrome:
The Havanna [sic] Syndrome, which is real has created many
questions. Just what is it? Who is controlling it? Could this technology be
used to disable large groups of people? How does the technology work? Is it
even a “real” syndrome? Our CIA, after years of claiming that the Havanna [sic]
Syndrome was the work of nefarious actors, came out with a highly redacted and
mostly classified report, whereby they appear to back off on some of these
allegations. But critics posit that this report is nothing more than a smoke
screen for whatever is really going on.
Is the Havanna [sic] Syndrome an example of an early
non-invasive brain-computer interface or weapon?
This technology, particularly without neural implants
(through radio waves and pulsed electromagnetic fields), has the capacity to
not only act on “volunteers,” but on non-volunteers as well.
Furthermore, if implants are involved - who controls them?
The user, the computer or a handler? What happens once someone leaves the
military? Can the implants be reprogrammed or hacked? Who owns the data?
The report goes on:
Improvements in neural implant
technology could be significant by the year 2050. Anticipated improvements
would focus on reducing the level of invasiveness of the implant itself. This
could be accomplished through location-specific assembly of electrodes using
biocompatible nanoparticles that can be directed through an external force
(doped iron oxide nanoparticles that can be positioned through the use of
directed magnetic fields) or through improvements to the signal acquisition
capabilities of externally placed electrodes and processors. The study group
expects that warfighter needs will influence these technological advancements;
however, such advances would plausibly lead to revolutionary changes in how
society interacts with machines on a daily level. These technologies
(personal robots, entertainment options, and vehicles) would be driven and
sustained by commercial entities.
The Report also discusses the public’s acceptance of cyborg
technologies and the role of the DoD to overcome the public’s fears about these
technologies:
The workshop participants
unanimously anticipated that state and non-state adversaries will seek to use
U.S. deployment of enhanced warfighters to undermine U.S. interests and
stigmatize the DOD as unethical.
Given the results of the Pew
study, religion seems a likely platform to galvanize these arguments against
U.S. interests with entertainment and social media reinforcement.
Mass media, including film and
literature, is also a known stage for demonization of cyborgs. From Frankenstein
to the Terminator, the message is often that technology’s integration with the
human body robs the human spirit of its compassion and leads to violence and
grave, unintended consequences.
However, fiction can also
reflect imaginative applications of emerging technologies as well as real
concerns with those technologies. For these reasons, fiction can be a powerful
tool for engaging the public in discussions of bioethics. A better-informed
public that creates and consumes media related to emerging technologies may
thus help DOD and its partners forecast ELSI concerns to mitigate problems
early in the development of enhancement-related capabilities.
The study group recommended
that efforts should be undertaken to reverse the negative cultural narratives of
enhancement technologies and leverage media as a means of engaging the public. Across
popular social and open-source media, literature, and film, the use of machines
to enhance the physical condition of the human species has received a distorted
and dystopian narrative in the name of entertainment. More accurate depiction
of technology and its applications in fiction and nonfiction media could lay
the groundwork for a new generation that sees opportunity for societal benefits
in cyborg technologies.
If technology is to become a
more intimate partner in the physical enhancement of the human species, then
DOD personnel must help alter distorted cultural narratives. A realistic,
balanced (if not more positive) narrative will serve to better educate the public,
mitigate societal apprehensions, and remove barriers to productive adoption of
these new technologies. Although not intrinsically a DOD mission, defense
leadership should understand that if they intend to field these technologies,
public and social perceptions will need to be understood and overcome.
I believe that this report suggests that the DoD engage in
psy-ops to convince both Americans and people worldwide that these technologies
are safe and our future will be better served by advancing them.
This report was published in 2019. The authors are listed on
the front cover. I did a little due diligence on these authors and found
that Scott
Walper, Science
Director, US Office of Naval Research Global, London (second author
of this report) has spent this year putting together a “collective” of people
to reimagine the world.
The Serendipity Collective is clearly the brain child of the
DoD (Navy) and yet that is not exactly crystal clear on the website…
Serendipity Collective - Future Reimagined
Seems to me that the psy-ops has already begun!
This DoD report
was first brought to my attention by Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, in a substack
Notes post.
© 2023 Robert
W Malone, MD
Who is Robert
Malone HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT
Who is Robert Malone
No comments:
Post a Comment