John R. Houk, Blog Editor
April 15, 2023
Here’s the theme I’m putting together. The New World Order (NWO)
now coming together more openly under the minority Elitist agenda to depopulate
what they consider to be the unnecessary among the masses to be replaced by
transhumanized (as in gene manufactured) people with a droned populace serving
an AI plugged wealthy few.
I’m starting off with a video I uploaded to my Bitchute
Channel borrowed from the Telegram Channel HATS:
Bitchute VIDEO: TRANSHUMANIST AGENDA (VIDEO
FROM HATS-TELEGRAM)
Posted by SlantRight2
First Published April 14th, 2023
17:11 UTC
Video found on HATS Telegram
Channel 4/14/23: https://t.me/HATSTRUTH/4375.
HATS DESCRIPTION:
Part of the satanic NWO agenda is
to create mass infertility around the world which in part has been achieved
thanks to the Convid vaccines, GMO's, fluoridated water and microplsctics.
This company EctoLife is helping
accelerate the transhumanist agenda by creating artificial womb pods which is
promoted through the WEF and other NGO's under the guise of sustainability and
depopulation.
MY THOUGHTS:
The EctoLife video is a promotional
selling a pain-free birth process in which the parent or parents can select
specific genes to shape the outcome of a child. The video appears to be
promoting a heterosexual miracle, BUT I can see the potential of the LGBTQ
godless blasphemy eliminating the God-design (CREATOR) of male and female
natural family in favor of the Godless Transformation promoted by the Globalist
Left. MEANING: EctoLife is not so a miracle but more a Satanic alternative of
reproduction. The process could further separate humanity from the Creator God
Almighty. The Good News for Christians is that such a blasphemy is yet another
sign Christ the true King is Returning soon to claim those who trust in the
Risen Savior.
You should read this entire Canada Free Press article
dated 12/13/22 partly because you get a snapshot of EctoLife promoter Hashem
Al-Ghaili (a German with a Muslim name), but it’s the last
paragraph that is concerning about the plan for gene-edited transhumanist
babies:
If all of this sounds
cold and inhuman to you, get in line. Yet, it does present some interesting
questions. It is a well-known fact that in the “New World Order,” that has been
openly discussed by elitists like Bill Gates and others, population reduction
is high on their list of priorities. Could this be phase two of their plan?
Eliminate 2/3 thirds of the population that they view as inferior and begin
re-populating with bio-engineered and genetically engineered human servants.
These humanoids would have predetermined personalities, political affiliations,
occupations and even life expectancies. They may even be programmed with a
mental switch, known only to the creators that can be triggered at any point in
their life to initiate an attack, or another type of sinister undertaking. In a
global society that is fiercely divided by pro life believers and those that
back abortion, why are extremely sophisticated “Baby Farms” being brought
forward for us to contemplate? Also, ask yourself this. These “Pod Farms” would
be astronomically expensive to construct and operate efficiently, so “Why”
isn’t the only question. Finding out “Who” wants them built is not only
absolutely necessary, but it may also answer the “why” question as well. --
WHO
IS REALLY BEHIND THE PROPOSED ECTOLIFE ARTIFICIAL WOMB FACILITY AND GENETICALLY
ENGINEERED BABIES? Ask yourself: These “Pod Farms” would be
expensive to construct, operate efficiently, so “WHY” isn’t the only question.
Finding out “WHO” wants them built is not only absolutely necessary, but it may
also answer the “WHY”; By Milt Harris;
CFP; 12/13/22
From transhuman babies I move to Artificial Intelligence
dangers (We
The People Convention) and Depopulation Designs from The
Exposé. The WTPC post and The Exposé are from the last
day or so but incorporate cross posts from earlier dates. WTPC re-posted
Left-leaning Time
from 3/29/23 and The Exposé quotes a 2015 post. It demonstrates this
tyranny has been planned for quite some time and has evolved way beyond theory
to downright nefarious Conspiracy.
JRH4/15/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip
in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated.
PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store
(please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
**********************
WARNING: AI Development Must Stop or it Will Kill Us ALL!
ELIEZER YUDKOWSKY--Shut Down AI Development
By ELIEZER YUDKOWSKY (Source-TIME)
Posted by Tom Zawistowski
Posted April 13, 2023
The most likely result of building a superhumanly smart
AI, under anything remotely like the current circumstances, is that literally
everyone on Earth will die.
BY ELIEZER
YUDKOWSKY MARCH 29, 2023 6:01 PM EDT
An open letter published today calls for “all AI
labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more
powerful than GPT-4.”
This 6-month moratorium would be better than no moratorium.
I have respect for everyone who stepped up and signed it. It’s an improvement
on the margin.
I refrained from signing because I think the letter is understating the
seriousness of the situation and asking for too little to solve it.
The key issue is not “human-competitive” intelligence (as the open letter puts
it); it’s what happens after AI gets to smarter-than-human intelligence. Key
thresholds there may not be obvious, we definitely can’t calculate in advance
what happens when, and it currently seems imaginable that a research lab would
cross critical lines without noticing.
Many researchers steeped in these issues, including myself, expect that the most likely result of building
a superhumanly smart AI, under anything remotely like the current
circumstances, is that literally everyone on Earth will die. Not as in “maybe
possibly some remote chance,” but as in “that is the obvious thing that would
happen.” It’s not that you can’t, in principle, survive creating something much
smarter than you; it’s that it would require precision and preparation and new
scientific insights, and probably not having AI systems composed of giant
inscrutable arrays of fractional numbers.
Without that precision and preparation, the most likely
outcome is AI that does not do what we want, and does not care for us nor for
sentient life in general. That kind of caring is something that could
in principle be imbued into an AI but we are not ready and do
not currently know how.
Absent that caring, we get “the AI does not love you, nor
does it hate you, and you are made of atoms it can use for something else.”
The likely result of humanity facing down an opposed
superhuman intelligence is a total loss. Valid metaphors include “a 10-year-old
trying to play chess against Stockfish 15”, “the 11th century trying to fight
the 21st century,” and “Australopithecus trying to fight Homo
sapiens”.
To visualize a hostile superhuman AI, don’t imagine a
lifeless book-smart thinker dwelling inside the internet and sending
ill-intentioned emails. Visualize an entire alien civilization, thinking at
millions of times human speeds, initially confined to computers—in a world of
creatures that are, from its perspective, very stupid and very slow. A
sufficiently intelligent AI won’t stay confined to computers for long. In
today’s world you can email DNA strings to laboratories that will produce
proteins on demand, allowing an AI initially confined to the internet to build
artificial life forms or bootstrap straight to postbiological molecular
manufacturing.
If somebody builds a too-powerful AI, under present
conditions, I expect that every single member of the human species and all
biological life on Earth dies shortly thereafter.
There’s no proposed plan for how we could
do any such thing and survive. OpenAI’s openly declared intention is to make some future AI do our AI
alignment homework. Just hearing that this is the plan ought
to be enough to get any sensible person to panic. The other leading AI lab,
DeepMind, has no plan at all.
An aside: None of this danger depends on whether or not AIs
are or can be conscious; it’s intrinsic to the notion of powerful cognitive
systems that optimize hard and calculate outputs that meet sufficiently
complicated outcome criteria. With that said, I’d be remiss in my moral duties
as a human if I didn’t also mention that we have no idea how to determine
whether AI systems are aware of themselves—since we have no idea how to decode
anything that goes on in the giant inscrutable arrays—and therefore we may at
some point inadvertently create digital minds which are truly conscious and
ought to have rights and shouldn’t be owned.
The rule that most people aware of these issues would have
endorsed 50 years earlier, was that if an AI system can speak fluently and says
it’s self-aware and demands human rights, that ought to be a hard stop on
people just casually owning that AI and using it past that point. We already
blew past that old line in the sand. And that was probably correct;
I agree that current AIs are probably just imitating talk of
self-awareness from their training data. But I mark that, with how little
insight we have into these systems’ internals, we do not actually know.
If that’s our state of ignorance for GPT-4, and GPT-5 is the same size of giant
capability step as from GPT-3 to GPT-4, I think we’ll no longer be able to
justifiably say “probably not self-aware” if we let people make GPT-5s. It’ll
just be “I don’t know; nobody knows.” If you can’t be sure whether you’re
creating a self-aware AI, this is alarming not just because of the moral
implications of the “self-aware” part, but because being unsure means you have
no idea what you are doing and that is dangerous and you should stop.
On Feb. 7, Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, publicly gloated that the new Bing would make
Google “come out and show that they can dance.” “I want people to know that we
made them dance,” he said.
This is not how the CEO of Microsoft talks in a sane world.
It shows an overwhelming gap between how seriously we are taking the problem,
and how seriously we needed to take the problem starting 30 years ago.
We are not going to bridge that gap in six months.
It took more than 60 years between when the notion of
Artificial Intelligence was first proposed and studied, and for us to reach
today’s capabilities. Solving safety of superhuman
intelligence—not perfect safety, safety in the sense of “not killing literally
everyone”—could very reasonably take at least half that long. And the thing
about trying this with superhuman intelligence is that if you get that wrong on
the first try, you do not get to learn from your mistakes, because you are
dead. Humanity does not learn from the mistake and dust itself off and try
again, as in other challenges we’ve overcome in our history, because we are all
gone.
Trying to get anything right on the first
really critical try is an extraordinary ask, in science and in engineering. We
are not coming in with anything like the approach that would be required to do
it successfully. If we held anything in the nascent field of Artificial General
Intelligence to the lesser standards of engineering rigor that apply to a
bridge meant to carry a couple of thousand cars, the entire field would be shut
down tomorrow.
We are not prepared. We are not on course to be prepared in
any reasonable time window. There is no plan. Progress in AI capabilities is
running vastly, vastly ahead of progress in AI alignment or even progress in
understanding what the hell is going on inside those systems. If we actually do
this, we are all going to die.
Read More: The
New AI-Powered Bing Is Threatening Users. That’s No Laughing Matter
Many researchers working on these systems think that we’re
plunging toward a catastrophe, with more of them daring to say it in private
than in public; but they think that they can’t unilaterally stop the forward
plunge, that others will go on even if they personally quit their jobs. And so
they all think they might as well keep going. This is a stupid state of affairs,
and an undignified way for Earth to die, and the rest of humanity ought to step
in at this point and help the industry solve its collective action problem.
Some of my friends have recently reported to me that when
people outside the AI industry hear about extinction risk from Artificial
General Intelligence for the first time, their reaction is “maybe we should not
build AGI, then.”
Hearing this gave me a tiny flash of hope, because it’s a
simpler, more sensible, and frankly saner reaction than I’ve been hearing over
the last 20 years of trying to get anyone in the industry to take things
seriously. Anyone talking that sanely deserves to hear how bad the situation
actually is, and not be told that a six-month moratorium is going to fix it.
On March 16, my partner sent me this email. (She later gave
me permission to excerpt it here.)
“Nina lost a tooth! In the usual
way that children do, not out of carelessness! Seeing GPT4 blow away those
standardized tests on the same day that Nina hit a childhood milestone brought
an emotional surge that swept me off my feet for a minute. It’s all going too
fast. I worry that sharing this will heighten your own grief, but I’d rather be
known to you than for each of us to suffer alone.”
When the insider conversation is about the grief of seeing
your daughter lose her first tooth, and thinking she’s not going to get a
chance to grow up, I believe we are past the point of playing political chess
about a six-month moratorium.
If there was a plan for Earth to survive, if only we passed a six-month
moratorium, I would back that plan. There isn’t any such plan.
Here’s what would actually need to be done:
The moratorium on new large training runs needs to be
indefinite and worldwide. There can be no exceptions, including for governments
or militaries. If the policy starts with the U.S., then China needs to see that
the U.S. is not seeking an advantage but rather trying to prevent a
horrifically dangerous technology which can have no true owner and which will
kill everyone in the U.S. and in China and on Earth. If I had infinite freedom
to write laws, I might carve out a single exception for AIs being trained
solely to solve problems in biology and biotechnology, not trained on text from
the internet, and not to the level where they start talking or planning; but if
that was remotely complicating the issue I would immediately jettison that
proposal and say to just shut it all down.
Shut down all the large GPU clusters (the large computer
farms where the most powerful AIs are refined). Shut down all the large
training runs. Put a ceiling on how much computing power anyone is allowed to
use in training an AI system, and move it downward over the coming years to
compensate for more efficient training algorithms. No exceptions for
governments and militaries. Make immediate multinational agreements to prevent
the prohibited activities from moving elsewhere. Track all GPUs sold. If
intelligence says that a country outside the agreement is building a GPU
cluster, be less scared of a shooting conflict between nations than of the
moratorium being violated; be willing to destroy a rogue datacenter by
airstrike.
Frame nothing as a conflict between national interests, have
it clear that anyone talking of arms races is a fool. That we all live or die
as one, in this, is not a policy but a fact of nature. Make it explicit in
international diplomacy that preventing AI extinction scenarios is considered a
priority above preventing a full nuclear exchange, and that allied nuclear
countries are willing to run some risk of nuclear exchange if that’s what it
takes to reduce the risk of large AI training runs.
That’s the kind of policy change that would cause my partner
and I to hold each other, and say to each other that a miracle happened, and
now there’s a chance that maybe Nina will live. The sane people hearing about
this for the first time and sensibly saying “maybe we should not” deserve to
hear, honestly, what it would take to have that happen. And when your policy
ask is that large, the only way it goes through is if policymakers realize that
if they conduct business as usual, and do what’s politically easy, that means
their own kids are going to die too.
Shut it all down.
We are not ready. We are not on track to be significantly
readier in the foreseeable future. If we go ahead on this everyone will die,
including children who did not choose this and did not do anything wrong.
Shut it down.
Yudkowsky is a decision theorist
from the U.S. and leads research at the Machine Intelligence Research
Institute. He's been working on aligning Artificial General Intelligence since
2001 and is widely regarded as a founder of the field.
©2023, We the People Convention
+++++++++++++++++++++
[Blog Editor: Where quotation marks are used I italicized
it. If an entire section or paragraph is a stand alone quote, I indented it.
AND in some cases I was so taken aback, I would use bold text emphasis. None of
which is in The Exposé original post.]
^^^
Shocking plans to implement depopulation and a worldwide
totalitarian system revealed more than 50 years ago
Featured image: Richard L. Day from The Revelations Of Dr Richard Day: An Ever Unveiling Prophecy (middle)
By RHODA WILSON
April 14, 2023
A set of audio tapes titled ‘The New Order of
Barbarians’ established the existence, scope and direction of a
conspiracy which was revealed by an insider, Dr. Richard Day, in 1969.
Dr. Day spoke at The Pittsburgh Paediatric Society in
March 1969. Dr. Lawrence Dunegan attended that meeting and in 1988 blew the whistle
about the plans that were in place in 1969 to form a new system of government,
altering all of society to implement this new system. All of society has been
redirected according to these plans.
“Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now … Some
of you will think I’m talking about Communism. Well, what I’m talking about is
much bigger than Communism!” Dr.
Day said.
^^^
Back
in 1969, Dr Richard Day made some astonishing predictions about where the world
would be today
By Henri Thibodeau,
originally published on 8 June 2015
On 20 March 1969, the late Dr.
Lawrence Dunegan (1923-2004) attended an astonishing lecture at a meeting
of the Pittsburgh Paediatric Society. The lecturer was Dr. Richard
Day (1905-1989), who at the time was Professor of Paediatrics at Mount
Sinai Medical School in New York. Day had previously served as Medical
Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Dr. Dunegan had been a student of Dr. Day at the University
of Pittsburgh, and was thus well acquainted with him. He later claimed that Dr.
Day had asked the attendees not to take notes or record what he was about to
tell them during that lecture. Something which Dr. Dunegan said he found
unusual for a professor to ask of his audience. The reason, Dr. Day implied,
was that there would be negative repercussions – possibly personal danger –
against him if it became widely known that he had talked about the information
he was about to relay to the group.
Dr. Day apparently also told the group that what he was
about to say “would make it easier for them to adapt if they knew what to
expect beforehand,” something of an ambiguous statement which became clearer as
Dr. Day spoke.
Insider of the “New World System”?
Dr. Dunegan got the impression that Dr. Day was talking as
an “insider” rather than as a person who was presenting a theory or speaking in
terms of retrospect. Dr. Day’s knowledge seemed concrete as he talked about the
future and the strategies of people and organisations that had a defined plan
for the world – what he called a “New World System” – and who were in a
position to make sure that plan was executed according to a set timescale.
“We plan to enter the
twenty-first century with a running start. Everything is in place and nobody
can stop us now…” – Dr. Richard Day, 20 March 1969, quoted by Dr.
Lawrence Dunegan
Apparently, when he got home that night, Dr. Dunegan wrote
down much of what he had heard from Dr. Day during that lecture, notes which he
kept to himself for about 20 years. In 1988, Dr. Dunegan recorded on tape his
memories of that astonishing lecture back in 1969 – these tapes have come to be
known as ‘The Dunegan Tapes’. Although Dr. Dunegan’s memory may have been
dimmed by the intervening years, he was able to provide enough details of the
lecture to enable any enlightened person to discern what may well be the real
purposes behind the trends of our time.
Get used to change…
“People will have to get used to
the idea of change, so used to change, that they’ll be expecting change.
Nothing will be permanent…” – Dr. Richard Day, 20 March 1969, quoted by Dr.
Lawrence Dunegan
To find out more about the contents of the Dunegan
Tapes, I encourage you to visit The Revelations of
Dr. Richard Day, an extremely well-documented WordPress blog
entirely dedicated to this subject, where you can explore the numerous topics
allegedly discussed by Dr. Day in his 1969 lecture, such as:
§ Euthanasia and the “Demise Pill”
§ Families will diminish in importance
§ Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) crops
§ New difficult to diagnose and untreatable disease
§ Suppressing cancer cures as a means of population control
You can also find a transcript of the Dunegan Tapes by
clicking on this link: 100777.com. I cannot vouch as to the exactitude of
this transcript, so the best thing you can do is listen to the actual tapes
on The Revelations of Dr Richard Day – Audio. It also
contains a subsequent interview taped in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 10
October 1991, where Randy Engel, Director of the US Coalition for Life,
interviewed Dr. Larry Dunegan.
The following are extracts from the Transcript of
The Dunegan Tapes, Tape 1. You can read the full transcripts of Tapes 1
to 3 HERE.
Population Control
Chemicals in food and in the water supply to reduce the sex
drive are not practical. The strategy then would be not to diminish sex
activity, but to increase sex activity, but in such a way that people won’t be
having babies.
Contraception Universally Available to All
Contraception would be very strongly encouraged, and it
would be connected so closely in people’s minds with sex, that they would
automatically think contraception when they were thinking or preparing for sex.
And contraception would be made universally available.
Sex Education as a Tool of World Government
Sex education was to get kids interested early, making the
connection between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives,
even before they became very active.
Tax-Funded Abortion as Population Control
Abortion will no longer be a crime. Abortion will be
accepted as normal and would be paid for by taxes for people who could not pay
for their own abortions.
Anything Goes – Homosexuality to be Encouraged
People will be given permission to be homosexual. They
won’t have to hide it.
Technology
Sex and reproduction would be separated. You would have sex
without reproduction and then technology was reproduction without sex. This
would be done in the laboratory.
Families To Diminish in Importance
Families would be limited in size. Divorce would be
made easier and more prevalent. Most people who marry will marry more than
once. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and
even live together.
More women will work outside the home. More men will be
transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel in their
work. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would
tend to make the marriage relationship less stable and, therefore, tend to make
people less willing to have babies.
One of the net effects of easier divorce laws combined with
the promotion of travel, and transferring families from one city to another,
was to create instability in the families.
Euthanasia And The “Demise Pill”
Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no
longer useful. They become a burden. You should be ready to accept death. Most
people are. An arbitrary age limit could be established.
Limiting Access to Affordable Medical Care Makes
Eliminating Elderly Easier
The cost of medical care would be made burdensomely high.
Medical care would be connected very closely with one’s work but also would be
made very, very high in cost so that it would simply be unavailable to people
beyond a certain time. And unless they had a remarkably rich, supporting
family, they would just have to do without care. And the idea was that if
everybody says, “Enough! What a burden it is on the young to try to maintain
the old people,” then the young would become agreeable to helping Mom and Dad
along the way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity.
Planning The Control Over Medicine
There would be profound changes in the practice of medicine.
Overall, medicine would be much more tightly controlled. All healthcare
delivery would come under tight control.
Access to hospitals would be tightly controlled.
Identification would be needed to get into the building. The security in and
around hospitals would be established and gradually increased so that nobody
without identification could get in or move around inside the building. And
anybody moving about the hospital would be required to wear an identification
badge with a photograph and … telling why he was there.
This is to be brought in gradually, getting everybody used
to the idea of identifying themselves – until it was just accepted. This need
for ID to move about would start in small ways: hospitals, and some businesses,
but gradually expand to include everybody in all places.
It was observed that hospitals can be used to confine people
… for the treatment of criminals. This did not mean, necessarily, medical
treatment. Basically, Dr. Day was describing the use of hospitals both for
treating the sick and for the confinement of criminals for reasons other than
the medical well-being of the criminal. The definition of criminal was
not given.
Elimination of Private Doctors
No longer would the doctor be seen as an individual
professional in service to individual patients. But the doctor would be
gradually recognised as a highly skilled technician – and his job would change.
The job is to include things like executions by lethal injection.
The solo practitioner would become a thing of the past. A
few diehards might try to hold out, but most doctors would be employed by an
institution of one kind or another. Group practice would be encouraged,
corporations would be encouraged, and then once the corporate image of medical
care – as this gradually became more and more acceptable – doctors would more
and more become employees rather than independent contractors. And along
with that, of course, unstated but necessary, is the employee serves his
employer, not his patient.
New Difficult to Diagnose and Untreatable Diseases
New diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before.
Would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable – at least for a long
time. I think AIDS was at least one example of what he was talking about. I now
think that AIDS probably was a manufactured disease.
Suppressing Cancer Cures as A Means of Population Control
“We can cure almost every cancer
right now. Information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it’s ever
decided that it should be released. But consider – if people stop dying of
cancer, how rapidly we would become overpopulated. You may as well die of
cancer as something else.” – Dr. Richard Day, 20 March 1969, quoted by Dr.
Lawrence Dunegan
Efforts at cancer treatment would be geared more toward
comfort than toward cure. There was some statement that ultimately the cancer
cures which were being hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light
because independent researchers might bring them out, despite these efforts to
suppress them.
Inducing Heart Attacks as a Form of Assassination
“There is now a way to simulate
a real heart attack. It can be used as a means of assassination” – Dr.
Richard Day, 20 March 1969, quoted by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan
Only a very skilled pathologist who knew exactly what to
look for at an autopsy could distinguish this from the real thing.
Education as a Tool for Accelerating the Onset of Puberty
and Evolution
There was also something about accelerating the onset of
puberty. And this was said in connection with health, and later in connection
with education, and connecting to accelerating the process of evolutionary
change. There was a statement that “We think that we can push evolution
faster and in the direction we want it to go.”
Blending All Religions …The Old Religions Will Have to Go
“Religion is not necessarily
bad. A lot of people seem to need religion, with its mysteries and rituals – so
they will have religion. But the major religions of today have to be changed
because they are not compatible with the changes to come. The old religions
will have to go. Especially Christianity … In order to do this, the Bible will
be changed. It will be rewritten to fit the new religion. Gradually,
keywords will be replaced with new words having various shades of meaning. Then
the meaning attached to the new word can be close to the old word – and as time
goes on, other shades of meaning of that word can be emphasised. And then
gradually that word replaced with another word.” – Dr. Richard Day, 20
March 1969, quoted by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan
“The Churches Will Help Us!”
“Some of you probably think the
Churches won’t stand for this … the churches will help us!” – Dr. Richard
Day, 20 March 1969, quoted by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan
Restructuring Education as a Tool of Indoctrination
In addition to changing the Bible classics in Literature
would be changed. Mark Twain’s writings were given as one example. But the
casual reader reading a revised version of a classic would never even suspect
that there was any change. And, somebody would have to go through word by word
to even recognise that any change was made in these classics, the changes would
be so subtle. But the changes would be such as to promote the acceptability of
the new system.
More Time in Schools, But They “Wouldn’t Learn Anything”
Children would spend more time in school, but in many
schools, they wouldn’t learn anything. They’ll learn some things, but not as
much as formerly.
Controlling Who Has Access to Information
In 1969 Dr, Day was already talking about computers in education,
and at that time he said anybody who wanted computer access, or access to books
that were not directly related to their field of study would have to have a
very good reason for so doing. Otherwise, access would be denied.
Schools as the Hub of the Community
In all the pushing for achievement, it was recognized that
many people would need help, and the people worth keeping around would be able
to accept and benefit from psychiatric services help, and still be super
achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore were
sort of dispensable – “expendable.”
Adults would be going to school. There’ll always be new
information that adults must have to keep up. When you can’t keep up anymore,
you’re too old. This was another way of letting older people know that the time
had come for them to move on and take the demise pill.
“Some Books Would Just Disappear from the Libraries”
This was in the vein that some books contain information or
contain ideas that should not be kept around. And therefore, those books would
disappear.
Further down the line, not everybody will be allowed to own
books. And some books nobody will be allowed to own.
Changing Laws
Sunday laws will be repealed. Gambling laws would be
repealed or relaxed so that gambling would be increased. He indicated then that
governments would get into gambling. “Why should all that gambling money be
kept in private hands when the State could benefit from it?” Dr. Day said.
Bankruptcy laws would be changed. Antitrust laws would be
changed, or be interpreted differently, or both.
The Encouragement of Drug and Alcohol Abuse to Create a
Jungle Atmosphere
Drug use would be increased. Alcohol use would be increased.
Law enforcement efforts against drugs would be increased. This sounds like a
contradiction but the idea is that, in part, the increased availability of
drugs would provide a sort of law of the jungle whereby the weak and the unfit
would be selected out.
The same thing would happen with alcohol. Alcohol abuse
would be both promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and
the weak would respond to the promotions and therefore use and abuse more
alcohol.
Drunk driving would become more of a problem, and stricter
rules about driving under the influence would be established so that more and
more people would lose their privilege to drive.
“Not everybody should be free to travel the way they do
now in the United States,” Dr. Dunegan explained referring to Dr. Day’s
lecture. “People don’t have a need to travel that way. It’s a privilege!”
The Need for More Jails and Using Hospitals as Jails
More jails would be needed. Hospitals could serve as jails.
Some new hospital construction would be designed so as to make them adaptable
to jail-like use.
Plans Revealed in Tape 2 of The Dunegan Tapes
§ no
more security
§ crime
used to manage society
§ curtailment
of American industrial pre-eminence
§ shifting
populations and economies – tearing the social roots
§ sports
as a tool of social change
§ gun
control
§ eliminating
femininity, baby dolls and tea sets
§ sex
and violence inculcated through entertainment
§ graphic
violence
§ music
will get worse
§ entertainment
as a tool to change the young
§ travel
restrictions and implanted ID
§ food
control
§ weather
control
§ politics
§ know
how people respond – making them do what you want
§ falsified
scientific research
§ terrorism
§ financial
control
§ surveillance,
implants, and televisions that watch you
§ home
ownership a thing of the past
§ the
arrival of the totalitarian global system
§ people
will just disappear
Further resources:
§ Audio: The
New Order of Barbarians (The Dunegan Tapes 1 to 3) on Internet Archive
§ Transcript of
The New Order of Barbarians on US
Coalition for Life
§ Transcript
of Dr Lawrence Dunegan’s taped reminiscences
§ New Order of
Barbarians on Wikispooks
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE
No comments:
Post a Comment