John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© June 20,
2022
I was
overhearing (yup okay, eavesdropping) a phone conversation between my
wife and her son (my stepson by marriage) – she had the speaker-phone
on. My pay-attention antennae arose when they began conversing about
COVID and the Jab. The son insisted he listened to truth based on facts and my
wife (his mother) only listened to misinformation and therefore had no facts.
Guess what – I am the primary source of my wife’s information, so my blood
began to boil.
I could tell
from the conversation the so-called truth spotted from my wife’s son sounded a
lot like the misinformation delivered to American Sheeple from the 3-letter
government agencies such as the CDC, FDA, NIH and so on. The primary liar being
current NIAID head Lord Fauci –
a proven greedy liar.
I have posted
over time reputed doctors and scientists who have had their reputations tarnished
for refuting the 3-letter agencies and Big Pharma’s Globalist control-the-people
line of faux-facts. [I ran a search on my SlantRight 2.0 Blog with
the words “Actual Science” and a number of posts come up refuting Globalist science:
READ
HERE. Feel free to do your search looking for vilified doctors and science
now propagandized as "misinformation" when in fact it is data with
different results from science brainwashers.]
ERGO, here is
some science the CONTROL-THE-PEOPLE Globalists will claim is misinformation in
the hope you will ignore actual science.
I begin with a
Jessica
Rose post (recommended by one of those pesky doctors resisting
faux-science – sorry I can’t recall which one but he was on Substack) about
how DNA can be altered via the mRNA Jab (vehemently denied by Globalist
science) complete with data attempted be hidden by Globalist Science and
includes something new for me – “self-amplifying RNA” (saRNA).
THEN the
UK-oriented The
Exposé brings up a published Swedish science study (from 2021)
which I quote from the first paragraph: “… the mRNA in the
Pfizer/BioNTech Covid injections infiltrates cells and transcribes its message
onto human DNA within 6 hours, altering our own DNA.” The article was
posted 6/19/22.
AND LAST, one
of my Wordpress subscriptions (Boudica2015)
alerted that the Boudica Rumble
Channel had picked up the Hibbeler Productions of their 2020
Documentary entitled, “The Plannedemic.” Boudica does not provide any
source info on the Rumble Channel, so I did a little digging. The Documentary
is in three parts and was - GASP!
– banned on Youtube. Here is the Hibbeler Productions
Youtube Channel. And here is the Hibbeler Productions webpage of assorted
videos available for minimal price purchase.
JRH
6/20/22
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to overcome research expenses:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive –
Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
***************************
When you
hear BNT162c(2), run, don't walk, RUN away.
It's already in the clinical 'trials'
By Jessica
Rose
June 19, 2022
Please head to the document entitled: “INVESTIGATOR’S
BROCHURE BNT162/PF-07302048” dated August 12, 2020.
About half a year ago, I suppose, I virtually sat across from a Canadian
researcher who was developing a new technology called self-amplifying RNA
(saRNA). If you want, you can watch that interview here. My hosts
are lovely people. At the time, I found it difficult to listen to my
co-interviewee because a) I used to be her and b) I know the dangers associated
with what she is developing. It is my opinion that she did not.
I revisited this interview whilst writing this and it is good. How
frikkin’ diplomatic am I?
“Why do the best solutions and advances, get
thrown away into the worst possible hands?” Jello Biafra.
Jello
Biafra (nee: Eric Reed
Boucher) performing at the 2014 Fun Fun Fun Fest
So the claim is that this self amplifying messenger RNA is awesome
because you need to inject less of it. But here’s the thing: it encodes its own
replicase enzyme - it makes copies of the RNA (whatever it is) once inside the
cells. Does that sound problematic to you? To me, it does. And here’s why. If
the other genes in the mRNA encode destructive proteins (like the modified mRNA
of the SARS-nCoV-2 spike protein), then… for one, how will it ever be possible
to turn off these self-amplifying RNAs? Are the replicases self-limiting?
If you ask me, the people developing and promoting this technology are
concerned only about profit, ‘cost’ and initial dose. They claim that adverse
event occurrences are proportional to the initial dose of RNA.
Hmm. Anna claims in the interview that the menstrual cycle disruptions induced
by the COVID-19 mRNA injectable products are temporary, and can also be brought
on by viral infections. She also claimed that the vaccinated people won’t get
severe COVID-19 in the context of hospitalization. Really? I missed out on that
point in the interview. She was pretty sure that since most of the people in
Israel had been injected, that this would explains why the majority of COVID-19
hospitalizations were in the context of the injected. But then, if the shots
were meant to reduce severity, why would they ending up in the hospital?
On saRNA
So as we all know by now, the messenger RNA in the COVID-19
Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna products, is the mode of delivery of information
for the cells in our bodies to make lots and lots of modified spike proteins.
That’s what these folks are now calling ‘conventional’ mRNA.1 Well
now! That was fast. Now it’s a CONVENTION? Aaaaaaaaaaalrightttttttyyyyy
thennnn.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41434-020-00204-y
So do you see the highlighted bit in green? That’s the code for nsP1-4
genes that following in situ translation that form an RNA-dependent RNA
polymerase (RdRP) complex resulting in accumulation of antigen within the cell.
The nonstructural proteins 1, 2, 3, and 4 (nsP1-4) are essential for replicon
activity as they form the RdRP complex.2 The
‘conventional’ modified mRNA is non-replicative because it does not include an
RdRP (RdRPs these take pieces of RNA and make copies of it). These enzymes are
very specific to the RNA. The UTRs help to maintain this specificity.
Apparently, no human RdRP can do this for the conventional RNAs. The saRNAs do
replicate, however. And apparently, again, the RdRP that comes with it, is the
only one that will allow this to perpetuate. Chicken and an egg?
Here are a few sources of information about this technology.3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Onto the document. Please skip ahead to page 13.
mRNA
Diagrams-Rationale-Overview
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2183-09.pdf.
Page 13.
So this saRNA has been on the schedule the whole time. They didn’t even
anticipate the possibility that the ‘conventional’ mRNA would be a failure,
because, if it was, imagine how bad that would be for the schedule! And guess
what, it’s being trialed now.
What do you want to bet that those trial participants have NO IDEA that
they are being injected with self-amplifying RNA? This study is active with
‘estimated’ primary completion date April, 2023 (final data
collection date for primary outcome measure).
· BNT162c2 will
be administered using a Prime/Boost (P/B) regimen. The vaccine BNT162c2 will
also be administered using a Single dose (SD) regimen.
· Experimental:
BNT162c2 (P/B) - Part A 18-55 years of age
· Escalating
dose levels
· Intervention:
Biological: BNT162c2.
· The primary
endpoint is 21 days post injection.
· Actual
Enrollment (submitted: January 12, 2022): 512
Trial
Investigating 4BNT162 Jabs
Jab
Investigation Study Summary
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04380701?view=record
I find two things to be insane:
1. That I
haven’t heard that the saRNAs are already being trialed and
2. That there
is no mention of self-amplifying mRNAs in the clinical trial data sheet. There
is, however, a very long exclusion criteria list and an informed consent clause
as part of it.
Inclusion criteria: Have given informed consent by
signing the informed consent form (ICF) before initiation of any trial-specific
procedures.
What do you want to bet that this document that required signing said
nothing of self-amplifying RNAs?
I put this together today when I opened up the FOIA document attached at
the top of this article. I had received an email on June 9th, 2022 (10 days
ago) that was addressed to myself and Robert Malone as to what the ‘BNT162c2’
was. I had told the addresser that I hadn’t heard of it before and Robert
pointed us both to the clinical trial with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04380701.
But, I still didn’t know what it was. Maybe it had a different LNP? Nope.
It’s a
completely different type of technology. Again.
What’s the encoded antigen? We’re not going to tell you! But we are going
to insist that you get injected with it. Or, no soup for you.
Clinical
Investigation Jab Candidates & Suspicious Redactions
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2183-09.pdf.
Page 18.
Even though there are peer-reviewed studies on this technology, I cannot
stress this point enough: WE NEED LONG TERM DATA WHEN IT COMES TO NEW TECH. Not
21 days. Not 365 days. We need years. We are NOT in an emergency and therefore,
we have the time to explore the safety and efficacy of saRNA technology
carefully and properly. Like we should have been doing the whole time with our
now magically ‘conventional’ mRNA tech.
Sorry, I have to include this screenshot. This is just too precious. It’s
so safe. Just inject me now. Wait, I can’t see! Everything turned black! Kind
of like the safety data redaction for the product. (Sorry for the very dark humor.
Sorry. I did it again.)
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2183-09.pdf.
Page 62.
Oh and they mention in section 7.2 Posology and method of administration,
that ‘the vaccine should not be injected into areas where there may be a major
nerve trunk’. Ok. Good to know.
And this literally made me LAUGH OUT LOUD. Look at this.
7.11.2 Non-clinical findings of note
All tested non-clinical and clinical vaccine
candidates were immunogenic to highly immunogenic in non-clinical models. The
available data demonstrate that BNT162b1, BNT162b2, BNT162b3, and BNT162c2 are
capable of inducing robust immune responses in mice, (except for BNT162c2)
rats and NHPs.
Why would they include BNT162c2 in this list if it’s not in the list?
So when you order a cheeseburger, because you love cheese, and it comes
without cheese on it and you complain, they yell at you that ‘cheeseburger’ is
just a word and had nothing to do with a burger having cheese on it, what are
you to do? Same logic, yeah?
If we have not learned yet that we need to be cautious with gene-based
therapies, then, you know what? I just don’t know what to say.
Einstein
Quote on Insanity Definition
NOTES
1
Bloom, K., van den Berg, F. & Arbuthnot, P. Self-amplifying RNA vaccines
for infectious diseases. Gene Ther 28, 117–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-020-00204-y.
2
Kääriäinen L, Ahola T. Functions of alphavirus nonstructural proteins in RNA
replication. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2002;71:187–222.
3
Maruggi, G., Ulmer, J. B., Rappuoli, R., & Yu, D. (2021). Self-amplifying
mRNA-Based Vaccine Technology and Its Mode of Action. Current topics in
microbiology and immunology, 10.1007/82_2021_233. Advance online
publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2021_233.
4
Brito, L. A., Kommareddy, S., Maione, D., Uematsu, Y., Giovani, C., Berlanda
Scorza, F., Otten, G. R., Yu, D., Mandl, C. W., Mason, P. W., Dormitzer, P. R.,
Ulmer, J. B., & Geall, A. J. (2015). Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines. Advances
in genetics, 89, 179–233. https://doi.org/10.1016.
5
Geall, A. J., Verma, A., Otten, G. R., Shaw, C. A., Hekele, A., Banerjee, K.,
Cu, Y., Beard, C. W., Brito, L. A., Krucker, T., O'Hagan, D. T., Singh, M.,
Mason, P. W., Valiante, N. M., Dormitzer, P. R., Barnett, S. W., Rappuoli, R.,
Ulmer, J. B., & Mandl, C. W. (2012). Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying
RNA vaccines.
6
McKay, P. F., Hu, K., Blakney,
A. K., Samnuan, K., Brown, J. C., Penn, R., Zhou, J., Bouton, C. R., Rogers,
P., Polra, K., Lin, P., Barbosa, C., Tam, Y. K., Barclay, W. S., &
Shattock, R. J. (2020). Self-amplifying RNA SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle
vaccine candidate induces high neutralizing antibody titers in mice. Nature
communications, 11(1), 3523. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17409-9.
(Notice the conflicts here.)
7
Ballesteros-Briones, M. C., Silva-Pilipich, N., Herrador-Cañete, G., Vanrell,
L., & Smerdou, C. (2020). A new generation of vaccines based on alphavirus
self-amplifying RNA. Current opinion in virology, 44,
145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.08.003.
8
Blakney, A. K., McKay, P. F.,
Hu, K., Samnuan, K., Jain, N., Brown, A., Thomas, A., Rogers, P., Polra, K.,
Sallah, H., Yeow, J., Zhu, Y., Stevens, M. M., Geall, A., & Shattock, R. J.
(2021). Polymeric and lipid nanoparticles for delivery of self-amplifying RNA
vaccines. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the
Controlled Release Society, 338, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.029.
(Notice the conflicts here.)
9
Lundstrom K. (2020). Self-Amplifying RNA Viruses as RNA Vaccines. International
journal of molecular sciences, 21(14), 5130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145130.
© 2022 Jessica Rose
+++++++++++++++++++++
Rumble VIDEO: BOMBSHELL:
Dr. Clare Craig Exposes How Pfizer Twisted Their Clinical Trial Data for Young
Children
Posted by Chief Nerd
Published June 17, 2022
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Gene Therapy: Study finds mRNA COVID
Vaccines enter liver and then alter DNA
By THE EXPOSÉ
JUNE 19, 2022
A Swedish
study has demonstrated and confirmed that the mRNA in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid
injections infiltrates cells and transcribes its message onto human DNA within
6 hours, altering our own DNA.
The
findings come after a previous study published in October 2021 from
Sweden found the spike protein enters our cells nuclei and impairs the
mechanism cells have to repair damaged DNA.
The
Highwire made an
easy-to-understand video explaining the previous study, including graphics, and
so it is a good starting point to help understand the significance of the
latest study from Sweden.
Rumble
(version The Exposé) VIDEO: IS
SPIKE PROTEIN CAUSING CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE TO DNA?
[Posted
by The HighWire with Del Bigtree
Published
November 15, 2021
Earlier
Studies
Preclinical animal studies of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid mRNA injection
(BNT162b2) showed reversible effects on the livers of rats including: enlarged
liver, vacuolation and increased enzyme levels (γGT, AST, ALP). In the
assessment report on BNT162b2 provided to EMA by
Pfizer, studies in rats demonstrated that the contents do not stay at the
injection site and a relatively large proportion (up to 18%) of the total
“vaccine” dose ends up in the liver.
Another study in May 2021 by MIT
scientists showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed
and integrated into the genome of human cells and expressed as chimeric
transcripts. Although no one from corporate media or corporate science seemed
to ask at the time, the findings of this study give rise to the question of
whether this same reverse transcription may also occur with RNA in Covid
injections.
ABC 10 News reported on the MIT study shortly after it was
published. [Blog Editor: Note Propaganda ABC implies
COVID changed DNA not the mRNA Jab, none of which lines up with the reporting.]
Youtube VIDEO: In-Depth: Study suggests
COVID-19 can alter DNA
[Posted by ABC 10 News
Posted on May 13, 2021
What is
Reverse Transcription?
Pictures speak a thousand words and so rather than try to write an
explanation we found a video which introduces the mechanism of reverse
transcription of HIV, a retrovirus. It may be a little dated and overly
simplistic but it illustrates how HIV infects a cell and replicates itself
using reverse transcriptase and the host’s cellular machinery.
Youtube VIDEO: HIV Life Cycle | HHMI
BioInteractive Video
[Posted by biointeractive
Posted on Oct 5, 2016
The First
Study of Reverse Transcription of Injection Spike Proteins
Because of the findings of the animal studies and the MIT study, a group
of Swedish scientists from Lund University conducted a study to investigate the
effect the Pfizer/BioNTech injection (BNT162b2) had on human liver cells and if
Pfizer’s encoded spike protein RNA can be reverse transcribed into DNA. The
study, ‘Intracellular Reverse
Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in
Human Liver Cell Line’, was published on 25 February 2022.
“In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver
cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the study authors wrote.
The study found that the mRNA injection is able to enter the human liver
cell line Huh7 and that the injections’ mRNA is reverse transcribed into DNA as
fast as six hours after the cells were exposed to it.
“A possible mechanism for reverse transcription is through endogenous
[intracellular] reverse transcriptase LINE-1, and the nucleus protein
distribution of LINE-1 is elevated by BNT162b2,” the study authors wrote.
“Huh cells are ‘immortal’ liver tumour cells and grow ad-infinitum if you
give them love,” Jessica
Rose explained, “LINE-1 is a reverse transcriptase that we carry
and comprises ~17% of our genome!”
“Our study shows that [Pfizer’s mRNA injection] … can be reverse
transcribed to DNA … and this may give rise to the concern if
[injection]-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the
integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side
effects.”
BNT162b2
Can Reverse Transcribe DNA
Intracellular Reverse
Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in
Human Liver Cell Line, Discussion section, Alden et al, Lund
University, Sweden, 25 February 2022
In the video below, Dr. Mobeen Syed, host of Dr. Been, explains
this study in layman’s terms. We have embedded the video to begin at timestamp
8:17 where he begins to explain, over the next 9 mins, reverse transcription,
Huh7 cells, LINE-1 gene expression, LINE-1 protein and what this all means.**
Youtube VIDEO: Pfizer Vaccine
Becomes DNA in Liver Cells. (In-vitro Swedish Study) [Full Video: 25:42]
[Posted by Drbeen Medical Lectures
Posted on Feb 25, 2022
The paper concludes: “Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect
of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence
on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse
transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.”
Referring to the study Dr.
Peter McCullough tweeted: “Alden et al, Lund University, Sweden, confirms
one of our worst fears. The exogenous [extracellular] genetic material coding
for the dangerous Spike Protein is reverse transcribed into the human genome;
possible long-term constitutive expression / synthesis of disease-promoting /
lethal Spike.”
Was This
the Plan All Along?
To answer the question whether this has been planned, below is a
selection of excerpts from infamous individuals regarding gene editing, in
their own words. No further comment is required, these excerpts speak for
themselves, you decide.
In an interview with Charlie Rose, Klaus Schwab said: “You see the
difference of this fourth industrial revolution is it doesn’t change what you
are doing, it changes you. If you take genetic editing, just as an example,
it’s you who are changing. And of course, this has a big impact on your
identity.”
Youtube VIDEO: Gene Editing - Klaus Schwab
- Charlie Rose - 2015
[Posted by Masonic World
Posted on Sep 27, 2021
View more: The Charlie Rose Show, Klaus Schwab
Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, stated, “In every cell
there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the
critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really
the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that
determines what the cell will do. So, we think about it as an operating system.
…. So, if you could actually change that, … if you could introduce a line of
code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications
for everything, from the flu to cancer.”
Youtube VIDEO: Rewriting the Genetic Code:
A Cancer Cure In the Making | Tal Zaks | TEDxBeaconStreet
[Posted by TEDx Talks
Posted on Dec 8, 2017
Read more: Bombshell:
Moderna Chief Medical Officer Admits MRNA Alters DNA, 12 March
2021
During an interview
with Anthony Fauci on 30 April 2020, Bill Gates said he was
particularly excited about pursuing a new approach called ‘RNA vaccine’. Gates
explained, “Unlike a flu shot, which contains fragments of the influenza virus
so your immune system can learn to attack them, an RNA vaccine gives your body
the genetic code needed to produce viral fragments on its own.”
Around this time Gates made a promotional video for his “RNA vaccines.”
Youtube VIDEO: Bill Gates erklärt Covid-19
und das Rennen um einen Impfstoff [Google translate German-to-English: Bill
Gates explains Covid-19 and the race for a vaccine]
[Posted by WELT Netzreporter
Posted on May 4, 2020
… MORE DESCRIPTION (in
German)]
Forbes published an article on 29 November 2021 from Steven Salzberg
titled, “Yes, The Vaccine Changes Your DNA. A Tiny Bit. That’s A Good Thing.”
And later retitled the article to “Covid Vaccines Don’t Alter Your
DNA – They Help Choose Cells to Strengthen Your Immune Response”.
The author changed the headline to emphasise that the vaccines “don’t
alter your DNA” without changing any of the article’s content.
Read more: Forbes
Admits mRNA Vaccines Alter DNA Then Changes the Headline, 2 December
2021
The Exposé HOMEPAGE
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[Blog Editor: WARNING! The Plannedemic
Documentary contains upset people expressing their feelings in profanity.]
Rumble VIDEO: The
Plannedemic - Part 1 (Hibbeler Production)
Posted by boudica001
Published June 15, 2022
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rumble VIDEO: The
Plannedemic - Part 2 (Hibbeler Production)
Posted by boudica001
Published June 15, 2022
+++++++++++++++++++
Rumble VIDEO: The
Plannedemic - Part 3 (Hibbeler Production)
Posted by boudica001
Published June 15, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment