John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© May 15, 2022
The online alternative news site THE EXPOSÉ posted an
article (https://expose-news.com/2022/05/15/vaccinated-people-emitting-mac-addresses/)
with a sure to controversial video which I am uploading to my Bitchute Channel.
The original video title is “corona2inspect-asuntomac-en” but I’m changing the
title to reflect THE EXPOSÉ article: “Vaccinated People Emitting MAC
Addresses; What’s Causing This Phenomenon?”
Controversy lay in the suggestion the mRNA experimental Jab
contains a nano substance that is WIFI compatible. If you do a search on any
Search Engine (from the top Leftist engine [e.g., Google] to some of the
so-called neutral Search Engines), you will quickly run into a majority of
citings the mRNA jabs have no graphene oxide in it according to the revelation of
Spanish researcher.
AND YET interestingly, a version of graphene from late 2021 through
early 2022 is now being touted as a miracle biomedical delivery system using
this title: “Graphene Oxide Hydrogels” (or some sort of nano-hydrogen
composition).
So in spite of the mRNA Graphene Oxide denials, why all of a
sudden all the science talk of using some form of Graphene Oxide emerging in
biomedicine?
The early Graphene Oxide claims of discovery was that it was
toxic and potentially lethal. Current science is touting Graphene Oxide as a
nano-biomedical delivery system for medicines in general not just the mRNA Jab.
So what if Graphene Oxide is not lethal and its presence was
hidden because Big Pharma simply was unsure about lethality? BUT NOW public
science is all excited about the delivery potential nano-biomedical solutions,
BUT are
the control-freak WEF Globalist scientists viewing a tracking and/or transhumanist
aspect of Graphene Oxide Hydrogels in human subjects?
I know and realize it’s all very speculative. BUT THINK
ABOUT the WEF’s transhumanist aspirations for controlling human beings and the
ever increasing science excitement surrounding Graphene Oxide Hydrogel nano-biomedical
delivery systems before dismissing completely THE EXPOSÉ article and video as
Science Fiction Conspiracy Theory thinking.
Just so you realize I’m not making this up as I go along.
Here are some links reflecting early Graphene Oxide concerns, a Graphene Oxide
denial, and current science excitement about Graphene Oxide nano-biomedical
delivery systems THEN go to THE EXPOSÉ cross post:
o GRAPHENE
OXIDE IN JABS, MASKS AND SWABS; Contributed by Alexandra Bruce; Forbidden Knowledge TV;
7/8/21
o Are
COVID-19 Vaccines Mostly Graphene Oxide? Here's What Experts Have to Say;
By Mark Bustos; The Science Times;
7/11/21 03:22 AM EDT
o Debunked:
No, Covid-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide; By Anthony King; TheJournal.ie; 8/30/21 6:15 AM
[Blog Editor: Not exactly a resounding gotcha, but enough to issue a
denial.]
o Graphene
in Biotechnology; Authors: Alba Centeno, Amaia Zurutuza Elorza; MilliporeSigma; No Date
o Graphene
Oxide Encapsulating Liquid Metal to Toughen Hydrogel; By Yijie
Hu, Hao
Zhuo, Yu
Zhang, Haihong
Lai, Jiwang
Yi, Zehong
Chen, Xinwen
Peng, Xiaohui
Wang, Chuanfu
Liu, Runcang
Sun, Linxin
Zhong [Hmm… Not a linguistic expert, but sure looks Chinese to me]; Wiley Online Library – Advanced Functional
Materials; First published – 9/17/21
o
Utilising
graphene to transform nanomedicine and health technology; By Professor
Kostas Kostarelos; Innovation
News Network; 2/8/22
AND NOW - THE EXPOSÉ!
JRH 5/15/22
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 -
$10 - $25 - $50 - $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to overcome research expenses:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
*************************
Vaccinated People Emitting MAC Addresses; What’s Causing
This Phenomenon?
Jabbed
People Emit MAC Addresses
By RHODA WILSON
MAY 15, 2022 12:30pm
The phenomenon of MAC emissions from people “vaccinated”
against Covid is an alarming fact that demonstrates a cause-and-effect
relationship, Corona2Inspect
wrote. Corona2Inspect has made a short video to explain how it is
happening and what the possible effects could be. But before you get to the
video at the end of this article, a bit of background to the contents of Covid
injections as they relate to the MAC phenomenon.
There are three clear pieces of evidence that micro or
nanotechnology related to nano-communication is in the Covid injections, Mik
Andersen of Corona2Inspect explained during an
interview with RichPlanet earlier this year.
The first is the detection
of rectangular
and quadrangular objects that respond to a morphology
of micro or nano “bowtie antennae” or double and quadruple leaf “bowties”,
which are explicitly collected in the scientific literature in the context of
intracorporeal wireless nano communication networks for nanoelectronic devices.
The second evidence is the
detection of objects with apparent circumscribed circuitry, with an important
similarity to the demux circuits of nano routers, among other
devices not yet identified, see the images obtained
by La Quinta Columna and the New Zealand team of
researchers.
Third, the location of graphic
evidence of epitexial self-assembly based on synthetic or artificial DNA
templates. A new test of synthetic DNA self-assembly and
nanotechnology has recently been obtained, finding an exact match between the
type of crystals that form in vaccines, compared to those observed in the
scientific literature on DNA nanotechnology. This last finding is about to be
published, and we hope that it ends up dispelling any doubts about it.
Mik Andersen further explained that Wireless
nano communication networks for intracorporeal
nanodevices have two clear goals.
The first is to monitor and collect data on the parameters,
activity or neurological, cardiac and physiological data of the individual,
facilitating their transmission to remote servers and databases, on the
Internet, to form the Big Data and its analytics through artificial
intelligence (“AI”) software.
The second is to interact with individuals, especially in
the neural section and the human psyche.
MAC addresses are set up in
memory circuits (we think also built with synthetic DNA and graphene). In this
way, they receive the electromagnetic signals and automatically encode them
into another simpler type of signal, called TS-OOK, with which the data is
re-transmitted in binary to a next level in the topology, that is, the nano
interface … The nano interface is another self-assembled electronic device that
is capable of encoding TS-OOK binary data for transmission outside the body.
The nano interface transmits
messages with very
specific headers, where the MAC device is identified, the IP
address to which the information is sent and the binary content with the
information obtained by the nodes in the base of the topology. These messages
have to be received by a ‘gateway’ – a mobile device or smartphone that has an
Internet connection – which would be responsible for sending the message to its
destination, without its owner knowing, remaining hidden in the data traffic.
In other words, any mobile phone close to the vaccinated individual could be
transmitting the data generated by the nanonetwork.
Mik Andersen also explained that the MAC addresses are not
“always on.”
A vaccinated person does not
always emit these MAC addresses, visible through the mobile phone’s Bluetooth
receiver. This is described in the scientific literature, specifically in the
DCCORONA and EECORONA wireless nano communication protocols. As indicated, one
of the problems of nano communication networks is the limited energy they have
to operate. This means that they are not always on, working, or signalling. It
only happens when they receive signals from outside the body or when
information is collected that must be transmitted.
Mik Andersen recommends watching a three-part documentary,
‘Brain Jabbed’, made by Richard Hall, host of RichPlanet TV, which explains
many of the topics covered in his interview with RichPlanet. The first part of
Brain Jabbed can be found by following this LINK.
Read more: RichPlanet’s
interview with Mik Andersen and Covid vaccine analysis
In a recent video, Mik Anderson summarised the MAC address
phenomenon. What could be causing it, what it consists of, what implications it
has for the person and society, the role of MAC protocols in the network and
more.
At the end of the video, a section has been dedicated to
speculating about the possible uses based on those stated in scientific
literature and the content confirmed and revealed in vaccines, graphene and
derivatives.
As the topics discussed may be complex for most of us to
understand, we have attached a copy of the video’s transcript which you may
find useful.
PDF
transcript of Corona2Inspect Video
After watching Corona2Inspect’s video below you may wish to
test the MAC phenomenon for yourself using your smartphone. To enable you to do
so, in the article ‘Summary
of the MAC phenomenon and the intracorporeal network of nano communications’,
Corona2Inspect gives the applications and MAC OIU finders to check if the MAC
addresses your phone is detecting belong to any electronic device
manufacturer. Below these instructions, Corona2Inspect has listed
numerous scientific papers which you can use to conduct deeper research.
Bitchute version of VIDEO: JABBED PEOPLE EMITTING MAC
ADDRESSES
[Posted by SlantRight2
First Published May 15th, 2022 18:48
UTC
Corona2Inspect:
Summary of the MAC phenomenon and the intra-body nano-network of communications,
8 May 2022 (24 mins)
THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE
ABOUT THE EXPOSÉ
No comments:
Post a Comment