Will Increased Election-Coup Info Contribute to Biden-Harris Removal?

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 2, 2020

 

Increasingly coup-elected faux-Prez Biden is demonstrating public incoherence. It’s an indication someone else is running the Executive Branch.

 

ALSO, as Leftist MSM realizes they screwed up in protecting and promoting Dementia Joe’s election are beginning to publicize information they once discredited as conspiracy news.

 

On a personal level, I have little confidence Biden/Harris will be removed from their puppet stations because that would crack the door open to expose Deep State puppeteers operating the USA unconstitutionally. The puppeteers will not give up power willingly. Which means I doubt any legal apparatus (I hope I’m wrong) will succeed in elections or Courts.

 

SO, where does that leave a restored Republic? Either a Deep State shoring up dictatorial power ending the Founders’ Republic or a civil war which may or may not succeed restoring some form of a new Constitutional Republic hopefully with at least some of the fingerprints of America’s Founders on a restored People’s Republic.

 

Future change or resistance to Globalist Transformation could be soon or decades depending on the degree the puppeteers are exposed to the American Public. It really is difficult to tell, but there is a sense SOMETHING is about to drop. I hope others have the same sense that something is happening behind the scenes that manifests to Public review.

 

Here are some cross posts that have ignited my sense antennas.

 

JRH 4/2/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**************************

Documentary Blows the Lid off the $400 Million Zuckerberg Effort to Elect Biden

  

Mark Zuckerberg speaks to Congress

 

By HANNAH BLEAU

March 31, 2022

Breitbart

 

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg spent nearly $400 million on the 2020 presidential election in an effort to bolster then-candidate Joe Biden and quash former President Donald Trump, a documentary film from Citizens United Productions, Rigged: The Zuckerberg-Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump, details.

 

The 40-minute documentary blows the lid off the tech billionaire’s efforts, alongside left-wing operatives, to unseat Trump under the guise of providing aid to assist with safety in the wake of the Chinese coronavirus pandemic. These leftists essentially dumped private funding into government elections, creating an artificial groundswell of get-out-the-vote efforts for Biden, whose public enthusiasm levels clearly waned throughout the election cycle, prompting jokes about the then-candidate hiding in his basement.

 

Overall, Zuckerberg spent $400 million in 2020 — only $61 million short of the $461 million the Democratic National Committee (DNC) spent in both 2019 and 2020.

 

The explosive documentary details just how these left-wing operatives sprinkled “Zuck Bucks” in various areas around the country to influence the election. All of this is documented via 990 forms non-profit groups file with the IRS.

 

Specifically, the documentary “traces the river of cash flowing from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to a pair of 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) and the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR).” Interestingly, the Chan Zuckerberg Institute happens to involve a number of well-connected Democrat players, including former President Obama’s former campaign manager, David Plouffe, whom the press release describes as the institute’s “Strategist in Residence.” Joel Benenson, the chief strategist for twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, also conveniently served as an adviser at the institute.

 

The CTCL, which received roughly $328 million in Zuckerberg money, awarded about 2,500 grants around the country. And while Zuckerberg’s team claims that Trump areas were awarded more money than Biden areas, the documentary explains how that assertion is “enormously, and perhaps purposely, misleading, because of the approximately 160 grants of $400,000 or more – totaling some $270 million – an incredible 92 percent of those funds went to jurisdictions carried by Joe Biden in 2020.”

 

As Breitbart News detailed consistently throughout the election year, Democrats used the Chinese coronavirus pandemic to usher in new voting rules under the guise of public safety, and that is exactly what “Zuck Bucks” operated under as well, as the grants were purportedly designed to assist with the “safe administration of public elections” throughout the pandemic. In other words, this money rushed to Democrat strongholds, as well as key swing areas, under the guise of addressing pandemic needs. Yet, that is not what they really intended it to do.

 

“This is all about the great intention of, hey, we’re gonna make it more secure,” Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry says in the documentary, as hardly any of the money went toward Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

 

“We’re gonna make it more safe. We want to make sure that people feel comfortable coming to the poll, but that’s not what they ended up doing,” Landry added, as these jurisdictions used the money to push Democrat objectives such as universal mail-in voting and ballot drop boxes, just as two examples. In other words, the money was used to create an artificial buzz benefiting Joe Biden. The money itself went to nearly every state– 48/50, including Democrat strongholds. According to the documentary, this strategy — dumping money in areas that Biden was sure to win (California) and sure to lose (Texas) “reveals that a secondary aim of the plan was to score a public relations victory by padding Biden’s popular vote tally, in the event that he lost narrowly in the Electoral College.”

 

Essentially, “Zuck Bucks” ultimately “pressured” governmental entities to adopt these radical Democrat ideas to transform the election, pushing mail-in ballots and increasing the number of ballot drop boxes, both of which stand as a “rampant invitation” for fraud, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) notes in the documentary. Ultimately, the film notes that the coronavirus provided the “perfect cover” for Zuckerberg’s money to go to work in crucial battleground states, fulfilling the Democrat mantra of never letting a  crisis go to waste.

 

Further, the film specifically focuses on three key battleground states, which Biden won by slim margins — Wisconsin, Arizona, and Georgia.

 

CTCL dumped $860,000 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, for example, and another $1.2 million in Green Bay and Madison, $1.7 million in Racine, and $3.4 million in Milwaukee. Similarly, the documentary reveals that $5.1 million of the Zuckerberg money went to Arizona. What is more, “four difference-making counties – Maricopa, Pima, Apache, and Coconino – received nearly 76 percent of the grants, and all were carried by Joe Biden,” per the press release. Notably, Biden won Arizona by less than half a percentage point, or fewer than 11,000 votes.

 

Perhaps most stunningly, $50 million in grants from both CTCL and CEIR went to the Peach State:

 

A whopping 94 percent of the CTCL funds in the state went to jurisdictions carried by Biden. Additionally, the consent decree signed off on by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger undercut the process for matching signatures on absentee ballots and restricted the ability to challenge contested ballots.

 

“In my mind, they were clearly rigging the election,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich says in Rigged. “I’m not convinced that the election was stolen on Election Day. I think the bigger story was that across the whole country for months, there was an effort to rig the election to make it virtually impossible for Trump to win.”

 

“We’ll follow the money and uncover the startling facts behind Election 2020,” Citizens United President David N. Bossie, who narrates the documentary, said. “In order to answer the question once and for all: What happened? And to ensure it never happens again.”

 

Former President Trump, who speaks in the film, noted that Zuckerberg was “putting money under the guise that he’s going to open up the election,” deeming it “crap.”

 

“That’s all crap. Not gonna open it up. He’s closing it. He’s making it impossible for a Republican to win,” he said.

 

Ultimately, the documentary is aiming at raising awareness of the powerful influence Zuckerberg and left-wing operatives had in the 2020 election, pulling strings behind the scenes and using the distraction of pandemic panic as a means to take down Trump.

 

“He should totally be held accountable,” Trump says in Rigged. “And he should never be allowed to do it again. And nobody else should. It was a rigged election. People have to find out what happened and they have to hold people accountable.”

 

The documentary will premiere at Trump’s “Winter White House” Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, on April 5, 2022. Viewers can watch the film after the premiere at www.Rigged2020.com.

 

READ MORE STORIES ABOUT:

Politics, David Bossie, election integrity, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg

 

Copyright © 2022 Breitbart

 

++++++++++++++++++

Mark Levin lays out the FACTS on the need for a criminal investigation into Joe Biden

 

Mark Levin

 

By THE RIGHT SCOOP [staff]

April 1, 2022 1:18 PM

The Right Scoop

 

Here’s another great segment from The Great One.

 

Last night Mark Levin laid the facts out on Hannity and explained why there needs to be a criminal investigation into Joe Biden over his role into the business dealings of Hunter Biden:

 

Rumble VIDEO: The Biden Corruption Conspiracy

[Posted by Mark Levin Show

Published April 1, 2022

 

Joe Biden’s legacy is one of dishonesty and lies. A federal investigation is finally underway to find out more about Hunter and Joe Biden’s underhanded foreign dealings and monetary transactions. The records show more evidence of the Democrats and Mainstream Media’s agenda to demonize conservatives and cover up their own misconduct. Our deceiver in chief should go down as the most corrupt president in history.]

 

Levin says that is very possible that Joe Biden might be the most corrupt president we’ve ever had and the media is still running interference for him, as will his corrupt Attorney General Merrick Garland. Levin says there’s no way Garland will allow a criminal investigation into Joe Biden.

 

In calling for a special prosecutor, Levin also reminds us of Tony Bobulinski, who came out in 2020 and verified that Joe Biden not only knew of his son’s dealings but was supposed to get a 10% cut.

 

In a related segment a former US Attorney was on Fox News to discuss Hunter Biden yesterday and echoed a similar sentiment, saying that the entire family should be under investigation. He added that if it were anyone else, there would have been criminal indictments a long time ago:

 

Rumble VIDEO: Former Prosecutor on Hunter Biden: Anybody Else Would Have Been Indicted Already

[Posted by Mr Producer Media

Published April 1, 2022

 

… MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

© The Right Scoop 2009-2022. All rights reserved.

 

+++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: Episode 1,752 - Miranda Devine: The Secrets Of The Laptop From Hell; Rigged 2020 The Movie

Posted by Bannons War Room

Published April 1, 2022

 

We discuss breaking news with the economy, judge Jackson, Hunter Biden's laptop, and more.

 

Our guests are: Mike Davis, Dave Bossie, Miranda Devine

Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join

 

Aired On: 4/01//2022

 

Watch:

On the Web: http://www.warroom.org

 

… MORE DESCRIPTION

 

+++++++++++++++

Who Is REALLY Running the Country?

We can speculate (and often do) about who is really calling the shots out of DC and across the globe. The only thing we know for certain is that it's neither Joe Biden or Kamala Harris in charge.

 

 

Puppeteers & Biden-Harris

 

By JD Rucker

April 1, 2022

NOQ Report

 

JD Rucker Podcast: Who Is REALLY Running the Country?

On today’s episode of JD Rucker LIVE, I took questions from listeners about whatever topic they liked. A variation of one question kept popping up — who is REALLY running America? It’s obviously not Joe Biden or the Democrat Party as they have demonstrated they’re somebody’s pawns. It’s not the GOP in DC who have very little power, and while at least half of them are corrupted by The Swamp they just don’t have the gumption to actually make anything happen.

 

I’m replaying this live show on my podcast, The Midnight Sentinel, because it’s an important topic. Yes, I discussed many issues outside of that question but it’s the one that stood out as important enough to discuss further.

 

So, who’s running the United States? Is it the same people who are running the world? Probably. And unfortunately that may have been the case from George H. W. Bush all the way through to Barack Obama. There was a blip in their control structure when Donald Trump won, which is why I’m convinced they did everything they could to steal the election from him in 2020.

 

Below, I made a list of the ten people/groups I believe are most likely to be truly in charge. It’s in no particular order so don’t give more weight to the top or the bottom. To be clear, neither I nor anyone outside of the inner circle of evil knowledge could possibly know for sure who’s really in charge. Whoever we might think it is at any given moment is almost certainly working on behalf of someone or something else. Until we get to the top of the evil food chain with Satan himself, everyone else is just a minion. The people and groups on this list happen to be extremely powerful minions.

 

There’s an important thing to consider before we get to the list, and that’s to know the difference between the high-level puppets and the actual puppet masters. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are definitely puppets. Missing from the list below are two prominent people and one prominent organization that are puppet masters in their own right, but who are not really at the top of the evil hierarchy even if many believe they are.

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton may be elites in the Democrat Party, but they are not top-tier globalists. They are pawns, middle managers really, who answer to higher players. The United Nations is also conspicuously missing from the list because they tend to be far too feckless to possibly be at or even near the top of the food chain. Moreover, there is far less control over who gets to participate at the U.N. than in organizations such as the World Economic Forum in which completely control is centralized.

 

By no means is this list complete. There are players I’ve never even heard of who may be more powerful than any of the people or groups below. There are probably players who we all have heard of who may be separated publicly but fully engaged privately. Elon Musk’s name was thrown out in one of the questions I was asked on the show. He’s said things that make us wonder about his motivations even as he’s said other things that make him seem like a “good guy.”

 

So, who is at least partially calling the shots? Who’s controlling Joe Biden’s strings? The closest thing to a right answer is that it’s a combination of some or even all of the ten entities listed below:

 

§  Barack Obama et al. – Susan Rice, John Brennan, and the various cohorts of Barack Obama are definitely influencing the White House, bureaucrats, and members of Congress. The only question is whether Obama emerged from being a puppet to a puppet-master or if he’s still doing the bidding of globalists above him.

 

§  Klaus Schwab and the WEF – This is arguably the most compelling option among the various individuals because Schwab has been working towards The Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution since before many of our readers and listeners were even born. The World Economic Forum is central to the globalists’ dreams. Is it the main hub or is the public facing version of a much darker organization?

 

§  The Deep State – How much control does the Deep State have over DC? All of it and none of it. That’s the enigma they represent because while they may control the three letter agencies as well as the media, they could just as easily be getting their orders from outside as they could be simply making it all up themselves.

 

§  George Soros and Open Societies – This is another intriguing consideration because while the WEF’s tentacles are geared towards grooming future globalist leaders, Open Societies works to actually put them in power.

 

§  Chinese Communist Party – They may be an external power trying to influence America or they may be so deeply embedded that they actually have much more control than we know.

 

§  Bill Gates et al. – Of all those on the list, Gates and his various organizations seem to be more likely to be powerful pawns than actual puppet-masters. Then again, that may be the front-facing persona they want everyone to think is real.

 

§  Vatican – It’s a conspiracy theory list, therefore the Vatican has to be on it. With Pope Francis in charge, there’s no telling how tied they are with the globalist elites. [Blog Editor: I’m not a hate-Roman-Catholics-kind-of-guy even though I disagree with most Catholic theology. I am an anti-Communist Pope because guy stands for Marxist Liberation theology and appears to gravitate toward acceptance of Biblically condemned morality.]

 

§  Powers and Principalities – Ephesians 6:12. We may have never even seen the puppet-masters. [Blog Editor: The context of Ephesians 6:12 via Ephesians 6: 10-17 NKJV]

 

§  The Rothchilds [sic] – It’s a conspiracy theory list, therefore the Rothchilds [sic] have to be on it. [Blog Editor: Way too many people look at the Rothschilds Jewish heritage and blame all Jewry for a NWO world domination agenda. That simply is an unjust application. It’s like blaming all Christians for a few who have a Christian heritage but turned to atheistic Communism to institute a transformed Globalist NWO. Covenant breaking is separating from God regardless if one is Jewish or Christian in their heritage.]

 

§  The Real New World Order – The nebulous New World Order may actually be a tangible New World Order that nobody fully understands. In fact, everyone on this list may be a part of it.

 

Tinfoil hat stuff aside, it’s clear that the so-called leader of the free world isn’t really the leader of anything. Someone is pushing this nation towards oblivion, but Joe Biden is just a mindless conduit.

 

Rumble VIDEO: Who Is REALLY Running the Country?

[Posted by The JD Rucker Show

Published April 1, 2022

 

… A LOT MORE IN DESCRIPTION]

 

© 2021 NOQ Report

 

++++++++++++++++++++++

See the full list of 51 deep state “intelligence” officials who lied about Hunter Biden’s laptop to try to defeat Trump in 2020

 

John Brennan - former CIA Director

 

By JD Heyes 

3/31/22

News Target

 

If any reasonable, thinking American doubted the existence of a “deep state” before Donald Trump became president, they were treated to a four-year object lesson in just how real it is.

 

Trump, the ultimate outsider candidate who had no political skeletons, was too popular to be canceled, and could not be bought off because he was already a billionaire, rankled and frightened the powerbroker elite in Washington because he really did believe in his “America First” agenda that they will never accept because they profit off of selling America out.

 

As such, the deep state went after Trump with a vengeance that was unprecedented against a president, even prior Republicans like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, the latter of whom is fully ensconced in the elitist D.C. power structure. The intelligence community came together like never before to spread lies about Trump, drop false narratives and plant fake stories that were eagerly parroted by the legacy left-wing media that serves as little more than the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.

 

To emphasize just how hard the deep state went after Trump, he became the first president to be impeached twice, and on the flimsiest of reasons, though both times the Senate refused to convict him.

 

The final act of the politically weaponized deep state, however, came just a few weeks prior to the 2020 election in November.

 

In mid-October, the New York Post, citing emails, photos and other materials found on a laptop Hunter Biden had abandoned at a computer repair shop in Delaware in 2019, published a series of bombshell reports detailing what a scumbag he is and how he used his father’s connections to land lucrative business deals and positions with foreign governments and companies, with a kickback percentage going to Daddy Joe.

 

While Big Tech and Big Media colluded to censor and discredit the reports, 51 officials within the deep state intelligence community gave them cover by signing a letter claiming that, while they did not know for sure, it appeared that the details contained in The Post’s reporting had ‘all the hallmarks’ of a “Russian disinformation campaign.”

 

But in fact, The Post’s reporting was based on legitimate factual information gleaned from Biden’s laptop and the intelligence community ‘experts’ knew that. But their objective was to get rid of Trump and derail his MAGA agenda, a goal shared with an eager-to-be-duped media that wanted Trump gone because they just didn’t like his conservative America-first agenda.

 

It was only after the election and Joe Biden had been safely installed in the White House that some media outlets began to confirm The Post’s original reporting. Politico did last year; The New York Times did so just last week in a report noting that Hunter Biden remains under investigation by the Justice Department for potential violations of the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) and tax fraud.

 

By the way, The Post followed up with those 51 now-former intelligence community officials, and in an editorial published earlier this week, the paper noted that it had tried to contact all of them to see if they had any remorse for claiming — falsely — that Biden’s laptop may have been Russian disinfo.

 

None did.

 

Here is the list, per The Post:

 

Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.

 

Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”

 

Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.

 

John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.

 

Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.

 

Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.

 

John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.

 

Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.

 

Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.

 

Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.

 

Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.

 

Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”

 

Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”

 

John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.

 

Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group:
Didn’t respond.

 

Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.

 

Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.

 

Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.

 

David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”

 

Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.

 

Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

 

John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

 

David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.

 

David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.

 

Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.

 

Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

 

James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.

 

David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.

 

Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.

 

Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”

 

Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.

 

Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”

 

Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”

 

Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

 

Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.

 

John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer: Declined to comment.

 

Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.

 

Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.

 

Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.

 

David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.

 

Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”

 

Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.

 

Sources include:

 

NYPost.com

USAFeatures.news

 

NewsTarget.com © 2021 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: Joe Hoft of TGP Talks with Intel Expert Tony Shafer on Bill Barr, 2020 Election, and More

Posted by The Gateway Pundit

Published March 31, 2022

 

Joe Hoft of TGP Talks with Tony Shafer

 

[Blog Editor: TGP post associated with the video: “Bill Barr Broke the Law… The Fix Is In… Bill Barr Did Not Do His Job” – EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Tony Shaffer on Barr’s Actions After the 2020 Election; By Joe Hoft; The Gateway Pundit; 3/31/22  2:30pm]

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

[Blog Editor: The most relevant content in the video below is the roughly first 30-minutes interview with Miranda Devine author of The Laptop from Hell.]

 

Rumble VIDEO: Hunter’s Laptop from Hell and the War in Ukraine With Miranda Devine

Posted by The Ann and Phelim Scoop

Published March 16, 2022

 

Three weeks before the 2020 election, Big Tech censored and banned the New York Post’s bombshell story about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which exposed his corruption related to Ukraine. Now, Joe Biden is President and there is a war in Ukraine. The story is incredibly relevant, but the media won’t touch it. We are joined by Miranda Devine, who literally wrote the book on Hunter’s laptop, to explain how this story directly relates to the Russo-Ukrainian war and US policy towards it.

 

Also on this episode, we discuss the disastrous impacts of masking and school shutdowns on kids, a tragic story from the “Sanctuary state” of California, and the somber anniversary of the start of the Gosnell trial.

 

… MORE DESCRIPTION