© July 24, 2019
Mueller and many Clinton-invested DOJ members stick to the
story the DNC email server was hacked by Russians then shared with Julian
Assange’s Wikileaks. Many of us anti-Crooked Hillary folks believe Seth Rich
had a hand in delivering the DNC email server content to Assange. There is
plenty of respectable tech analysis the DNC server content was downloaded to a
thumb drive and delivered to Wikileaks.
o
Mr.
Mueller: Was the DNC Server Actually Hacked by the Russians? By GEORGE
PARRY; The American Spectator; 3/29/18 12:00
AM
o Roger
Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server – Court Won’t Provide It
Because They Don’t Have the Proof; By Joe Hoft; The Gateway Pundit;
5/11/19
o Bill
Binney and Larry Johnson, How we Know the DNC was NOT “Hacked by the Russians”;
By James Fetzer; JamesFetzer.org;
3/1/19
o Julian
Assange, CrowdStrike, and the Russian Hack That Wasn’t; By Michael Thau; American Greatness;
7/13/18
o Assange
Expected to confirm Wikileaks source of DNC Emails was Seth Rich not Russians;
By Dr Michael Salla;
MichaelSalla.com;
4/25/19
If indeed the later is truer than the former, it is a strong
indication Rich was assassinated rather than murdered in random street mugging.
ALSO the implication looms some in the DOJ (Obamanistas & Clintonistas) insisted on a
Russian hack as part of a path to perpetuate Trump/Russian Collusion in the
2016 Election. AND THAT implication indicates very dark government corruption
in perpetuating a hoax as a coup against President Trump.
JRH 7/24/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:
Please Support SlantRight 2.0
VIDEO Confirms Butowsky Lawsuit Claim: Julian Assange
Told Ellen Ratner DNC Emails Received From Seth Rich
Posted by MyLegalHelpUSA
July 23, 2019
Cross Posted from The
Last Refuge/TheConservativeTreeHouse.com
By sundance
July 21, 2019
Not a Russian Hack…
A lawsuit filed a week ago by
Businessman Ed Butowsky, alleged that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange told Fox
News analyst Ellen Ratner the DNC leaked emails were received from Seth Rich
and his brother Aaron. [Full Backstory Here]
Due to the scale of ramification, there was some valid
skepticism about the Butowsky assertion. However, recently unearthed
footage from Ellen Ratner talking about her visit with Assange in November of
2016 seems to validate what the Butowsky’s lawsuit alleges.
In the video [Full Video Here] taken during
a November 9th, 2016, Embry Riddle University symposium, Fox News
analyst Ellen Ratner, representing the left, and former Congressman now Fox
political analyst John Leboutillier, from the right, discussed the aftermath of
the 2016 presidential election. WATCH EXCERPT:
[Posted by Baxter
Published on Jul 21, 2019
The excerpt is taken from 01:01:00 of
the FULL VIDEO HERE
[h/t Michael Sheridan for
the excerpt] The date of the Ratner symposium November 9, 2016, aligns
with the time-frame of Ratner’s travel and meeting with Assange as outlined by
Butowsky in his lawsuit. As noted Mrs. Ratner confirms that she did
meet with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, and that he did in fact tell her
the leaked DNC emails came from inside the DNC. It was not a Russian
hack.
Hopefully this will spur the DOJ under Attorney General Bill
Barr to launch an inquiry which must obviously start with the questioning of
Ratner.
Accepting some enhanced credibility now exists, the details
contained within the lawsuit filing (full pdf below)
are stunning.
If this information is true and accurate, now bolstered by
the video of Ratner, the DOJ claim of a Russian hack – based on assertions by
DNC contractor, Crowdstrike – would be entirely false. Additionally
the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive.
Here’s the Full Butowsky Court Filing:
The ramifications here are almost too large to describe.
If this information turns out to be true and accurate, the
entire narrative around the DNC “hack” will have been proven to be
intentionally manufactured.
Despite the FBI’s prior admissions about never reviewing the DNC servers; and despite their recent
admissions about never actually seeing
the forensic computer analysis, the U.S. Department of Justice,
specifically Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann and former DAG Rod Rosenstein,
cannot blame a simple investigative ‘mistake‘ for the wrong attribution
of who gave the DNC emails to Wikileaks.
The FBI, the DOJ and the Mueller special counsel have each
purposefully claimed specific Russian actors were responsible for hacking the
DNC in 2016. If it turns out those claims were based on falsehood, the
integrity of the DOJ and Special Counsel collapses.
Mr. Butowsky is making a very serious allegation in this
court filing.
Additionally, the previously discussed motive to arrest
Julian Assange would now be further enhanced. Heck, the reason for Assange’
arrest would be brutally obvious.
♦Dana Boente was head of DOJ-NSD
from May 11th, 2017 through end of October 2017 when he officially
announced his intent to retire. However, the timeline gets
cloudy here because Boente said he was staying on until an official replacement
was announced. There’s no indication of when Boente actually left the DOJ-NSD
or the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) role.
On January 23rd, 2018, FBI Director Christopher Wray
announced Dana Boente had shifted over to the
FBI to be Chief Legal Counsel (replacing James Baker) where
Boente remains today. As Mueller was using 19 lawyers, and 50 FBI
investigators, Boente was/is the legal counsel to FBI Director Christopher Wray
while the Mueller probe was ongoing.
[Remember, Robert Mueller never interviewed Julian Assange.
Additionally, it is worth noting for the U.S. side of the legal framework,
the charges against Assange are
not related to Russian efforts in a hack of the DNC; nor is Assange charged
with anything related to the 2016 U.S. election interference activities, the
Podesta email release or anything therein as previously described by the DOJ.]
The April 11th, 2019, Julian Assange
indictment stemmed from the Eastern District of Virginia. From
a review of the indictment we discover it was under seal since March
6th, 2018: (The DOJ sat on the indictment for 13 months, until Mueller finished)
However, on Tuesday April 15th, 2019, more investigative
material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury,
*December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to December ’17..
The investigation of Assange took place prior to
December 2017, it is coming from the EDVA where Dana Boente was still,
presumably, U.S. Attorney. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of
2018 until April of 2019.
Why was there a delay?
Why did the DOJ wait until the Mueller report was complete?
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was
four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Assange in August of
2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic
Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill
Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday
he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last
year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful
information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California
Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee
on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange
during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London,
where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his
conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a
wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic
National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,”
Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not
involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the
source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately
with President Trump. (read more)
If you overlay the timing, it would appear the FBI took a
keen interest in Assange after this August 2017 meeting and gathered specific
evidence for a grand jury by December 2017. Then the DOJ sat on the indictment
(sealed in March 2018) while the Mueller probe was ongoing; until April 11th,
2019, when a coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was launched. Assange
was arrested, and the indictment was unsealed (link).
To me, as a person who has researched this three year
fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference
narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, JAR report (needed
for Obama – December 29th, ’16), and political ICA (January
’17); this looked like a Deep State move to control Julian Assange because the Mueller
report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes…. AND that narrative
is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story.
The Weissmann/Mueller/Rosenstein report contains claims that
Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference
narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks
and Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview.
Right there is the FBI motive to shut Assange down when the
Mueller report was released.
The DNC hack claim is contingent upon analysis by
Crowdstrike computer forensics who were paid by the DNC to look into the issue.
The FBI was never allowed to review the servers independently, and now we know
the FBI never even looked at a
full forensics report from Crowdstrike.
Almost all independent research into this DNC hack narrative
challenges the claims of a Russia hack of the DNC servers; and now this
bombshell court filing, again if accurate, makes the DOJ claim completely
collapse.
Lastly, if we are to believe everything that is factually
visible; including the admissions by the FBI and DOJ itself; and it is proven
that Seth Rich was indeed the source of the DNC emails and there was no hack;
well,… what does that say about Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein, who would
have had to know they were pushing abject lies in their
dubious Russian indictments.
The ramifications of this court filing are huge.
______________________
Intro to Butowsky Lawsuit, Seth Rich Gave
DNC Server to Assange
Intro by John R. Houk
© July 24, 2019
_______________________
VIDEO Confirms Butowsky Lawsuit Claim: Julian Assange
Told Ellen Ratner DNC Emails Received From Seth Rich
No comments:
Post a Comment