© August 8, 2018
Alex Jones is literally being censored on every digital
media format I can think of.
I have to be clear. I am not a supporter or big fan of Mr.
Jones. Many of his Conspiracy Theories propagated from his soapbox are just
plain outlandish and crazy.
The massive digital censorship Jones is accused of is hate-speech.
Frankly, as outlandish and offensive Jones can be I am not surprised the
hate-speech accusations are levelled against him.
I do have a couple of problems with the censorship.
ONE: The same media platforms censoring Jones allow
Muslims to spew Jew-Hatred and promote physical harm to Jews and other
non-Muslims. However, when a non-Muslim points out Islamic tenets and Muslim
history demonstrate violent hatred for all things non-Muslim specifying Jews,
Christians and polytheists. Militant homosexuals overtly express hatred toward
Biblical Values Christians yet will censor Biblical Values Christians for supporting
the Bible’s labelling the homosexual practice a sin against God’s Word. In essence
this is censorship hypocrisy.
TWO: The same media platforms rarely if ever censor
Left-Wing calls for violence against Conservatives yet they will censor
Conservatives refuting a violent Leftist agenda. For example Maxine Walters advocating
Leftists to disrupt reputed Conservative meetings and Conservatives living
their private lives at open-to-the-public venues. Astonishingly to date,
Conservative individuals have refused to respond with self-defense violence for
Leftist provocation. I’m a disabled dude and I don’t know if I would exhibit
such self-restraint to respond with action if someone shouting directly in
front of my face.
I hate defending Alex Jones because I am convinced he has
used actual hate-speech; however look at some of phrases the digital media
platforms label as hate-speech worthy of censorship via banning:
The resident Jew, Leftist Jews, Jewish Mafia (Alex
Jones Accused Of Anti-Semitism, Sexual Harassment; By Aiden Pink; Forward.com;
3/1/18)
The same article on Forward.com also illustrates
actual forms of hate-speech via sexual harassment which is unacceptable but
demonstrated on Alex Jones programs.
I don’t know what Alex Jones other than the vague accusation
of the kind of speech the digital platforms call hatred or inciting violence:
“… the stated reason for the ban on
his content is not defamation but “hate
speech” against Muslims, transgender people, and other groups.” (Booting
Alex Jones from social media wasn't wrong, but it could be dangerous;
By Cathy Young; USA Today; 8/8/18 9:03 a.m. ET)
If the hate-speech was critical of a belief system
corresponding to Islam or the LGBTQ agenda, then said hate-speech violation is
an absurd accusation. If Jones said something dimwitted such as maybe, “hunt
down the camel jockeys and give them a tasted of their own medicine” or “rope
the fudge-packer and drag the shem down the road”. Those kinds of phrases are
indeed inciting violence and is a good reason for censuring and/or banning.
Here is the Joseph Farah email (which is also a bit of a
fundraiser) that inspired my thoughts.
JRH 8/8/18
*********************
The pretense and subtlety are over, ‘Digital Cartel’ now overtly
attacking ‘offensive’ voices
|
By Joseph Farah
Sent 8/8/2018 4:01 AM
Sent from WND
I’ve been warning everyone who would listen about the
greatest threat to freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of
religion in America today.
It’s not government.
Instead, the overt attack on America’s First Amendment comes from the corporate behemoth internet gatekeepers who are in ideological lockstep with each other – from Google to YouTube to Facebook to Twitter to Apple to Amazon.
This week, YouTube and Facebook followed Apple’s lead in banishing Alex Jones, the iconic, high-energy voice that rails against globalism and the Deep State daily on radio, podcasts and his own Infowars TV show. He was an easy target and a predictable one – a controversial figure, without doubt, and a high-profile one with a sizable following.
Not everyone wants to defend Alex Jones – certainly not everything he says.
Yet, the First Amendment wasn’t crafted by America’s founding geniuses to protect tepid, non-controversial speech. It was crafted to protect just this kind of fiery dialogue – the kind that offends some people, some sensibilities. Alex Jones is a good choice to start the censorship juggernaut rolling if you think like the Southern Poverty Law Center. And one thing Apple, Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon all have in common is their love of, reverence for, and partnerships with this extremist band of smear merchants who never met anyone right of center that they didn’t label a “hater,” a “fascist,” a “Nazi” or a “racist” – including, of course, the current president of the United States.
So, first the Digital Cartel came for Alex Jones.
Who will be next? I don’t know, but I don’t plan to find myself in the position in which Martin Niemöller found himself in Nazi Germany. He’s most famous for this prescient quotation: “First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.”
I’m going to defend Alex Jones’ right to say what he wants – even if I sometimes, or even often, find myself in disagreement with him. And I’m going to condemn this cabal of bloated mega-corporations imposing their ideology on America’s most vital public square – the digital media.
Maybe you say, “Well, Farah, don’t these corporations have the absolute right to approve and disapprove of the viewpoints they carry – just like you do?” The answer may be surprising: No, they don’t. None of these conglomerates are publishers, content producers, part of the “press.” They are more akin to “utilities” – like the telephone companies of old, or the electricity producers who have a public obligation to be fair and neutral in offering the services they provide to all, without regard to race, religion and ideology. They don’t have to like Alex Jones. They don’t have to listen to Alex Jones. But if they are going to hold these privileged positions of making lots of money by distributing all manner of content, data and information to the public, they dare not think of themselves as ideological gatekeepers against "offensive" political speech. And they better not designate the disgraced partisan hacks of the SPLC as their content cops, which is precisely what they have done – all of them!
I know I sound like a broken record on this theme, but I’m going to keep pounding on it until the public catches on to the threat these trillion-dollar monopolies pose to America’s precious institutions of free speech, the free press and freedom of religion. We need congressional hearings. We need action in Washington. We need President Trump to recognize who the biggest purveyors of fake news really are. It’s not just CNN and the Huffington Post. It’s their distribution arms – Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple and Amazon – the Digital Cartel.
It's time to throw down the gauntlet, draw a marker in the sand, file class-action lawsuits, summon our leaders to action.
Are we going to let this cabal render the First Amendment null and void?
I’ve been telling you how they have attacked WND relentlessly and ruthlessly through its politically and religiously discriminatory algorithms. I’ve told you how they have been coming after the independent media, especially since the 2016 election that so disappointed all of them.
Do you really want to talk about supposed Russian interference in our free society when this powerful monolithic cartel is setting the rules of debate for Americans out in plain sight – openly censoring voices they don’t like while systematically elevating those they do like? What a sick joke!
As for me, I will defend the voices of dissent, and even controversy, as long as I have a soapbox upon which to stand. I know they are coming after me and the world's first independent online news company, which I founded 21 years ago. Once again, I ask you to stand with me, or else find yourself living in a country you won’t long recognize. No privacy. No freedom.
Please support us, or risk finding yourself living in a very different and scary version of America soon.
It’s not government.
Instead, the overt attack on America’s First Amendment comes from the corporate behemoth internet gatekeepers who are in ideological lockstep with each other – from Google to YouTube to Facebook to Twitter to Apple to Amazon.
This week, YouTube and Facebook followed Apple’s lead in banishing Alex Jones, the iconic, high-energy voice that rails against globalism and the Deep State daily on radio, podcasts and his own Infowars TV show. He was an easy target and a predictable one – a controversial figure, without doubt, and a high-profile one with a sizable following.
Not everyone wants to defend Alex Jones – certainly not everything he says.
Yet, the First Amendment wasn’t crafted by America’s founding geniuses to protect tepid, non-controversial speech. It was crafted to protect just this kind of fiery dialogue – the kind that offends some people, some sensibilities. Alex Jones is a good choice to start the censorship juggernaut rolling if you think like the Southern Poverty Law Center. And one thing Apple, Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon all have in common is their love of, reverence for, and partnerships with this extremist band of smear merchants who never met anyone right of center that they didn’t label a “hater,” a “fascist,” a “Nazi” or a “racist” – including, of course, the current president of the United States.
So, first the Digital Cartel came for Alex Jones.
Who will be next? I don’t know, but I don’t plan to find myself in the position in which Martin Niemöller found himself in Nazi Germany. He’s most famous for this prescient quotation: “First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.”
I’m going to defend Alex Jones’ right to say what he wants – even if I sometimes, or even often, find myself in disagreement with him. And I’m going to condemn this cabal of bloated mega-corporations imposing their ideology on America’s most vital public square – the digital media.
Maybe you say, “Well, Farah, don’t these corporations have the absolute right to approve and disapprove of the viewpoints they carry – just like you do?” The answer may be surprising: No, they don’t. None of these conglomerates are publishers, content producers, part of the “press.” They are more akin to “utilities” – like the telephone companies of old, or the electricity producers who have a public obligation to be fair and neutral in offering the services they provide to all, without regard to race, religion and ideology. They don’t have to like Alex Jones. They don’t have to listen to Alex Jones. But if they are going to hold these privileged positions of making lots of money by distributing all manner of content, data and information to the public, they dare not think of themselves as ideological gatekeepers against "offensive" political speech. And they better not designate the disgraced partisan hacks of the SPLC as their content cops, which is precisely what they have done – all of them!
I know I sound like a broken record on this theme, but I’m going to keep pounding on it until the public catches on to the threat these trillion-dollar monopolies pose to America’s precious institutions of free speech, the free press and freedom of religion. We need congressional hearings. We need action in Washington. We need President Trump to recognize who the biggest purveyors of fake news really are. It’s not just CNN and the Huffington Post. It’s their distribution arms – Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple and Amazon – the Digital Cartel.
It's time to throw down the gauntlet, draw a marker in the sand, file class-action lawsuits, summon our leaders to action.
Are we going to let this cabal render the First Amendment null and void?
I’ve been telling you how they have attacked WND relentlessly and ruthlessly through its politically and religiously discriminatory algorithms. I’ve told you how they have been coming after the independent media, especially since the 2016 election that so disappointed all of them.
Do you really want to talk about supposed Russian interference in our free society when this powerful monolithic cartel is setting the rules of debate for Americans out in plain sight – openly censoring voices they don’t like while systematically elevating those they do like? What a sick joke!
As for me, I will defend the voices of dissent, and even controversy, as long as I have a soapbox upon which to stand. I know they are coming after me and the world's first independent online news company, which I founded 21 years ago. Once again, I ask you to stand with me, or else find yourself living in a country you won’t long recognize. No privacy. No freedom.
Please support us, or risk finding yourself living in a very different and scary version of America soon.
___________________
Banning Alex Jones?
John R. Houk
© August 8, 2018
__________________
First, they came for Alex
Jones ...
WND
| 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC
20006
This is a good sequel to my yesterday's post (http://slantedright2.blogspot.com/2018/08/banning-alex-jones.html#.W2xoi9IzrIU) on digital media censorship.
ReplyDelete