By Tony Newbill
Edited by John R. Houk
Posted December 21, 2016
Tony Newbill focuses on the conspiratorial corruption the
Obama Administration did nothing to curb and perhaps might be in collusion in
abetting.
JRH 12/21/16
*************
The Disinformation effort
12/14/2016 2:12 PM
The Disinformation effort .... to discredit an election that
was won because the people are tired of the LIES and Deception!
By what these 4 links show that it’s pretty hard to say
there is not a concerted effort to see what society is up too and then try and
direct a narrative, by the Government and Media, and I would say that Trump new
this and talked Truth about it and is why he won, not some Russian Hacking
effort to steal the election.
Is Facebook
really a CIA-funded data collection
program?
Why wouldn't it be?
We already know that the NSA snoops through our email, as well as our phone records and
calls. And it was recently revealed that the CIA created a “Cuban
Twitter” to encourage insurrection.
It was called ZunZuneo, and it was offered to Cubans via the country’s
mobile-phone network as a free text service. The program attracted 40,000
subscribers before mysteriously ending operations in 2012.
…
The (Social) Network
The Facebook-CIA connection revolves around James Breyer, a partner at the
investment firm ACCEL.
Accel was one of Facebook's early investors, plunking down $12.7 million in
2005. That dwarfed the initial venture capital investment of $500,000 from
Peter Thiel. In fact, Accel was Facebook's biggest shareholder after Mark
Zuckerberg at the time of the company's IPO, with an 11% stake.
And as it happens, Breyer, the guy who made it happen, has some very close
ties with the U.S. government.
You see, in addition to his role at Accel, Breyer sat on the board of
directors at BBN – a defense contractor that helped create the internet. And in
2004, he was joined there by Gilman Louie, the CEO of In-Q-Tel – an technology
investment firm that was founded by the CIA.
Indeed, the CIA launched In-Q-Tel in 1999, with a focus on data mining, and
Louie was put in charge.
And that's not all.
Also on BBN's board was Dr. Anita Jones.
Jones, also a member of the In-Q-Tel board, was formerly the director of
Defence Research and Engineering for the U.S. Department of Defence. At the
DoD, Jones reported directly to the Secretary of Defence and oversaw the
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
DARPA, of course, is responsible for the development of new technologies
the military. It also houses one of the most insidious branches of government
bureaucracy, the Information Awareness Office.
The IAO was established in 2002 to bring together several DARPA projects
that use surveillance and information technology to track and monitor
“terrorists.” The goal of these endeavors is “Total Information Awareness
(TIA).”
TIA means creating enormous computer databases to gather and store the
personal information of everyone in the United States, including personal
emails, social networks, credit card records, phone calls, medical records, and
numerous other sources, without any requirement for a search warrant.
Once this information was made public there a firestorm of criticism. It
was … READ ENTIRETY (The CIA Has Sent You a Friend
Request: Is Facebook Really a CIA Front? By Jason Simpkins; Outsider
Club; 4/7/14 5:18 PM)
FACEBOOK 4EVA
IS SOCIAL NETWORKING THE ULTIMATE BIG BROTHER TOOL?
When Desperate Housewife Eva
Longoria used Facebook to spring her cheating husband of three years, Tony
Parker, just before Christmas, she was using social networking to gather
intelligence. But she’s not the only one, and some agencies are salivating at
the information they’re gathering on citizens across the world
WORDS BY IAN WISHART
WORDS BY IAN WISHART
…
Sociologists have discovered the
same thing in public life – that virtually all of us can be linked through our
acquaintances and friendships, within six degrees of separation, to anyone else
on the planet – even to Kalahari bushmen.
This “interconnectedness” is one of
the driving principles that Facebook is designed to exploit, but in doing so
has it created a monster? …
…
But just as it has made infidelity
easier, Facebook has also made it easier to track, and that’s where the Big
Brother twist comes in. …
…
Former Israeli intelligence agent
Ari ben-Menashe published a book called ‘Profits of War’ in 1992 that caused a
worldwide sensation, because it described for the first time a plan by Israeli
spy agency Mossad to create a computer programme capable of monitoring
individuals and working out who their circle of friends were. That programme
was called PROMIS, and it was picked up not just by Mossad but also the CIA and
the NSA in the US.
…
Information, said ben-Menashe,
might include phone records that showed who the target associated with, or
locations that he regularly visited. “The programme…would have the ability to track the movements
of vast numbers of people around the world. Dissidents or citizens who needed
to be kept under watch would be hard put to move freely again without Big
Brother keeping an eye on their activities.”
That was 1992. When the whistle was
blown the intelligence agencies ran for cover, and organisations in New Zealand
and elsewhere who had purchased PROMIS ditched it. But the dream of tracking
social networks via computer did not go away. Imagine the fun to be had if
people voluntarily waived their rights to privacy and uploaded their personal
information and friendships online for everyone to see.
In 1998, the CIA ostensibly gave up
the fight to lead the world in IT intelligence software.
…
Instead of developing software, the
CIA set up a company called In-Q-Tel in 1999 to go into venture partnerships
with private capital firms to develop and fund promising new technologies that
could help the CIA “data mine” for useful intelligence.
…
The CIA’s website makes In-Q-Tel’s
mission clear:
“In-Q-Tel’s mission is to foster
the development of new and emerging information technologies and pursue
research and development (R&D) that produce solutions to some of the most
difficult IT problems facing the CIA. To accomplish this, the Corporation will
network extensively with those in industry, the venture capital community,
academia, and any others who are at the forefront of IT innovation.”
The first CEO of In-Q-Tel was
Gilman Louie, and he and his CIA subsidiary were appointed with seven others to
the Board of Directors of the National Venture Capital Association of America
in 2004. The chairman of the NVCA was James Breyer of Accel Partners, and one
of his first tasks that year was to give a young student named Mark Zuckerberg
US$13 million in venture capital. What for? Well, in February 2004, Harvard
student Mark Zuckerberg launched Facebook, a new social networking service
designed to help fellow students stay in touch with each other.
James Breyer was also chairman of
BBN, a Silicon Valley company whose Arpanet technology had helped kick off the
internet with the assistance of the US Defence agencies. Joining Breyer at BBN
in 2004 were both In-Q-Tel’s Gilman Louie and Dr. Anita Jones, a colleague of
Gilman Louie’s at In-Q-Tel, and a former advisor to DARPA, or the Defence
Advanced Research Projects Agency.
In Facebook terms, these CIA and US
Defence Department types were just one degree of separation from Facebook
itself, and their chairman James Breyer was one of the initial bankrollers of
Facebook.
One of DARPA’s projects was
“scalable social network analysis”, or SSNA, which researcher Sean McGahan
described this way: “The purpose of the SSNA algorithms program is to extend
techniques of social network analysis to assist with distinguishing potential
terrorist cells from legitimate groups of people …
In order to be successful SSNA will require information on the social
interactions of the majority of people around the globe. Since the Defense
Department cannot easily distinguish between peaceful citizens and terrorists,
it will be necessary for them to gather data on innocent civilians as well as … READ ENTIRETY (Is
Facebook the new ‘Big Brother’? Posted by iwishart; Investigate Daily; 9/30/11)
It’s been a rough couple days for The
Washington Post. Word emerged that hackers invaded
its internal system—for a few days, no less—all of its staffers had to change
their passwords as the company tried to figure out how much data had been
compromised.
Meanwhile, a petition campaign was
launched related to news that Amazon, under the Post’s new owner, Jeff Bezos,
recently secured a $600 million contract from the CIA. That’s at least twice
what Bezos paid for the Post this year. Bezos recently disclosed that the
company’s Web-services business is building a “private cloud” for the CIA to
use for its data needs.
Critics charge that, at a minimum,
the Post needs to disclose its CIA link whenever it reports on the agency. Over
15,000 have signed the petition this week hosted by
RootsAction.
In a statement released by the Institute
for Public Accuracy, media writer/author Robert McChesney observes:
When the main shareholder in one
of the very largest corporations in the world benefits from a massive contract
with the CIA on the one hand, and that same billionaire owns the Washington
Post on the other hand, there are serious problems. The Post is unquestionably
the political paper of record in the United States, and how it covers
governance sets the agenda for the balance of the news media. Citizens need to
know about this conflict of interest in the columns of the Post itself.
If some official enemy of the
United States had a comparable situation—say the owner of the dominant
newspaper in Caracas was getting $600 million in secretive contracts from the
Maduro government—the Post itself would lead the howling chorus impaling that
newspaper and that government for making a mockery of a free press. It is time
for the Post to take a dose of its own medicine.” (Amazon, ‘The Washington Post’ and That $600
MIllion CIA Contract; By Greg Mitchell; The Nation; 12/19/13)
Who really could have hacked the DNC?
How often are social media accounts
hacked? Although it’s a tricky question, the short answer is clear: way too
often.
Social media account takeovers are
an increasingly common occurrence, affecting the likes of politicians, celebrities,
brands, other high-profile accounts and even Mark Zuckerberg, the father of the social media
revolution. But they also trickle down to individuals and small business
accounts in striking numbers.
A social media profile is a
valuable tool for corporations and celebrities to spread awareness, but it’s
also a broad, easily exploited, and often unregulated attack surface. If the
page itself is compromised, the brand can become tarnished and trusting users
can be enticed to click malicious links, directing to phishing pages, scams, or
exploits.
…
Measuring the cost of high-profile
breaches is more difficult; most instances of account takeovers do not reveal
the full impact of the breach. We can, however, point to specific instances
where the cost of the breach has been quantified. … Clearly, these account takeovers have
potentially huge financial impacts to the victims.
…
READ ENTIRETY (HOW
OFTEN ARE SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS HACKED? By John Seymour; ZeroFox.com;
10/21/16)
+++
PAY ATTENTION TO THIS California Legislation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12/15/2016 9:57 AM
This shows the Institutions that are used to facilitate the
Dark State manipulation of the Mind and the spying by the
PLUTOCRACY/Technocracy THAT GETS BAILED OUT AND SUBSIDIZED WITH THE blood,
sweat and tears of the society!!!!!
Click on any graphic to enlarge: [Blog
Editor: There are 19 graphics to click and enlarge.]
College is a Perfect venue for Mind Manipulation to make
Slaves out of Free Thinkers:
What are college students focusing
on these days—apart from sex, booze, and drugs? Well, moral values, if you can
call a deep desire for “free everything” a value. And maybe “feeling triggered”
and “needing a safe space” is also, somehow, a value. As is demanding that many
words be excised from the English language, because they might offend someone
who is a member of a designated victim-class. College is quite a scene
these days.
…
Therefore, a different kind of
propaganda had to be sprayed on students; the most shallow kind of “social
justice” possible—in order to divert these boys and girls from revealing the
underlying corruption of their adult minders. Hence, China-style political
correctness.
These days, students are, for the
most part, oblivious to how their colleges and universities are funded.
I’m not talking about donations
from graduates and boosters, or revenue generated from televised football
games. I’m talking, for example, about secretive government agencies.
CIA, NSA, DIA (Defense Intelligence
Agency).
At WikiLeaks, Julian Assange posted
an overview (10/7/2007), “On the take and loving it—academic
recipients of the US intelligence budget.”
Consider Assange’s stunning
conclusion: “Over the last decade, U.S intelligence funding of academic
research has taken on cavalier, even brazen qualities. This article reveals
over 3,000 National Security Agency and over 100 Defense Intelligence Agency
funded papers [written by professors] and draws attention to recent unreported
revelations of CIA funding for torture research.”
Torture research. If people need
evidence that the CIA’s MKULTRA is
still alive, there it is.
Assange: “The NSA has pushed tens
or hundreds of millions into the academy [colleges] through research grants
using one particular grant code. NSA funding sources are often nakedly, even
proudly, declared in research papers (‘I may be nothing, but look, a big gang
threw me a sovereign’). Some researchers try to conceal or otherwise downplay
the source using accepted covers, weasel words and … READ ENTIRETY (Send
your kid to college: support the Surveillance State: The NSA is alive and well
on campuses; By Jon
Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog;
12/15/16)
PAY ATTENTION TO THIS California Legislation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This
article is dedicated to Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising,
a book everyone should read. Yesterday.
A bill introduced by the notorious Richard Pan, the mover and shaker
behind the mandatory vaccination law in CA—this new one, SB18, is
a grab-bag of generalities basically giving over care of children to the State.
Catch
the flavor of the wording. It emerges like swamp gas:
“The
Legislature finds and declares that all children and youth, regardless of
gender, class, race, ethnicity, national origin, culture, religion, immigration
status, sexual orientation, or ability, have inherent rights that entitle them
to protection, special care, and assistance, including, but not limited to, the
following: The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best
interest. The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for
their care and well-being. The right to live in a safe and healthy environment.
The right to social and emotional well-being. The right to opportunities to
attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development. The right to
appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in
adulthood. The right to appropriate, quality health care.”
…
This
bill is basically setting up the population of California for state regulatory
agencies to fill in the blanks later, to make specific controls out of the
vague generalities in the bill. Get it?
“Medical
care and nutrition and parenting and education are what we say they are. We
define and enforce, you obey.”
SB18
is also an invitation to immigrants anywhere in the world who can get to
California with their children, or will give birth to children after arriving:
“Just be here and we’ll take care of you.”
But
let’s go to the money. In SB18, a group is referred to: the Peninsula
Partnership Leadership Council (when you go to “Assembly Concurrent
Resolution No. 80” referenced in SB18):
…
This Council has already written a children’s bill of
rights,
and SB18 is saying this is the model. This is the framework. This the pattern
they’re following.
…
The Peninsula
Partnership Leadership Council (PPLC) is composed of the San Mateo County Superintendent of
Schools, the County Board of Supervisors and the Silicon Valley Community
Foundation.
Bam.
It’s
a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION. It runs 1800 philanthropic funds.
Here are some of its corporate partners:
Alexza
Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell.
Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture
Fund, “building and scaling social inventions.”
For
some reason, this huge Foundation is pushing a children’s bill of rights that
is reflected in a new CA bill, SB18, that will eventually make the State the
top-dog controlling force over all children in California.
You
can bet these corporate partners will reap profits. Beyond that, this is their
version of a MASSIVE social engineering program. And that program is part of a
technocratic movement to plan, format, and run the lives of the population from
cradle to grave, because…
…
They
should rule the future because they can plot and chart it out, based on their version
(you weren’t consulted) of “greatest good for the greatest number.”
The
best place to start? THE CHILDREN.
This
is … READ ENTIRETY (Bombshell: Sacrificing children to the state of
California: SB18: Watch out for the big money behind this operation: it’s the
secret: Watch out for the big money behind this operation: it’s the
secret; By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 12/15/16)
+++
US Government Workers
using Child Porn
12/16/2016 12:19 PM
*****ATTENTION***** “Impunity for US government workers using child porn”
-- THINK ABOUT THIS .... WHERE IS THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA ON THIS????????????
THIS #PIZZAGATE is way to big a Deal to not be Government Connected because
this would not be going on as is described in this Video:
VIDEO:
Impunity for US government workers using child porn
Posted
by Lori Handrahan
Published
on Sep 23, 2012
Prof
Lori Handrahan of American University outlines cases where employees in e.g.
judiciary, police, foreign service are being protected by the Department of
Justice when they are caught using child porn. Specific cases from Vermont and
Maine are described.
Child Porn Nation:
America’s Hidden Security Threat.
This is a Big Deal!!!!!!
When Senator Lamar Alexander’s (R
TN) Chief of Staff, Ryan Loskarn,
was arrested, last year, for trading in the rape and torture of children, aka
child pornography, not one journalist provided context to the story. The media
reported Loskarn’s arrest, and subsequent suicide pending trial, as if it were
a one-off event. As if, no other high-level government employees were being arrested
on child porn charges.
So,
I suppose I should be thrilled to see that both Paul Farrell, the Breaking News Editor for Heavy,
and Shane Harris,
Sr. Intelligence and National Security Correspondent for The Daily
Beast and New America Foundation Fellow, tried to provide context to
the State Department’s Director of Counterterrorism, Daniel Rosen’s arrest,
26 February 2015, on charges of computer solicit of a child under 15 years old
for sex/sodomy.
Farrell
reported Rosen’s arrest was “the Second Child Sex
Scandal to Hit D.C. in 12 Months.” Harris said Rosen’s arrest marks
the “3rd U.S. Official Hit
With Child Sex and Porn Charges.”
… A simple Google or Twitter search reveals far more than two or three government officials arrested on similar charges.
Research
101
As I
have been documenting, for years now, by all accounts there is both a national
child porn crisis and, within that, a crisis of American
federal and state employees engaged in child porn. In what appears
to be epidemic numbers men are down-loading child porn often on their work
computers at The Pentagon, The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), The Department of
Justice (DOJ), Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE), The Department of Transportation (DOT), The Transportation
Security Agency (TSA), The Federal Bureau of
Investigations (FBI), The Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA) not to mention state-level
police departments from Maine to California.
Maine’s Governor, Paul
LePage, has recognized this crisis by
issuing the first, to my knowledge, of its kind Executive Order,
on 20 February 2015, prohibiting … READ ENTIRETY (State Dept. Dan Rosen’s Arrest: Cheat Sheet
for Journos; By Lori Handrahan; Responsible
Business; 2/27/16)
Would they PUSH the Russian
Hacking/Aleppo-Syria Narrative to get Obama to Start a WAR in SYRIA over this and
dump it on TRUMP to take the light off the 150-Billion-dollar Child Sex
Trafficking/Porn Industry?
Every day, men, women and children are forced, defrauded, or coerced into labor or sexual exploitation, with 20.9 million victims of human trafficking globally. Trafficking and its related crimes not only harms the victims involved; they also undermine the social, political and economic fabric of the nations where they occur by devaluing individuals, demeaning women, and increasing violence and crime.
Join
Hadassah in raising awareness and urge policy makers at the local, state, and
federals levels to take action.
And NOW with the Hillary
Clinton Donors wanting to know why they Lost 1.2 Billion in donations and want
Answers because these People are part of this 150-Billion-dollar Child Sex
Trafficking Industry. They are going to FORCE Obama to create WAR before he leaves
office in Syria using the Russian/Hacking/Aleppo Syria narrative and dump it on
TRUMP and this will distract the light on this!!!!!
WHAT’S THE TRUTH????? You know what’s amazing is the propaganda being put out by MS Media that the USA needs to go to War with Russia in Syria to stop Assad while we have this Canadian News Journalist saying it’s not Assad doing the Bombing and War Crimes against his People, ITS THE Obama Backed Rebels!!!!!
VIDEO: General Wesley
Clark Asked About 7 Country War Plan
Posted
by WeAreChange
Published
on Sep 25, 2013
In
this video Luke Rudkowski asks General Wesley Clark about a speech he made
where he revealed pentagon plans for War with seven countries in five years.
Clark's reaction speaks volumes as he does not say much and walks off when
asked about Obama's handling of Syria, one of the countries mentioned in the
pentagon plan.
Watch Clark's speech … READ THE REST
Watch Clark's speech … READ THE REST
General Clark in 2007:
VIDEO: The Plan --
according to U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.)
Posted
by RBoon
Uploaded
on Mar 17, 2007
In
an interview with Amy Goodman on March 2, 2007, U.S. General Wesley Clark
(Ret.), explains that the Bush Administration planned to take out 7 countries
in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Lybia [sic], Somalia, Sudan, Iran
VIDEO: General Wesley
Clark explains ISIS was created by U.S. Allies [Blog Editor: Warning—a bit
of profanity to expression his passion]
Posted
by AMTV
Published
on Feb 22, 2015
In
today's video, Christopher Greene of AMTV reports on a Wesley Clark interview
on ISIS.
AMTV Website: http://www.amtvmedia.com
Donate $5 / month to AMTV: http://www.amtvmedia.com/donate/
Get our weekly Newsletter: http://www.amtvmedia.com/newsletter/
VIDEO: The Truth About
Aleppo Syria [Blog Editor: Warning—a bit of profanity to expression his
passion]
Posted
by AMTV
Published
on Dec 14, 2016
In
today's video, Christopher Greene of AMTV reports on The Truth About Aleppo
Syria.
Pentagon paid 500 million to
produce Fake Video Propaganda in Iraq, how do we know if they are not Creating
this Russian Propaganda???
VIDEO: Reality Check:
Pentagon Paid $500 Million to PR Firm To Create Iraq Propaganda Videos
Posted
by Ben Swann
Published
on Oct 11, 2016
The USA needs to find a New
Foreign Policy Strategy to avert WW3.
+++
Russian Hacking/Aleppo
Syria Narrative
12/16/2016 3:10 PM
I am telling you this Russian
Hacking/Aleppo Syria Narrative the Liberal Media and Obama Hillary players are
singing is to INSTIGATE WAR in Syria and then Dump it on TRUMP. I would not let
them do it just Like not letting them say Benghazi was because of a Video!!!!!
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/12/16/month-left-office-mr-red-line-obama-vows-action-russia-424413
With
about a month left to go in his administration President Obama has finally
decided to go after Russia.
“I
think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the
integrity of our elections, that we need to take action and we will — at a time
and place of our own choosing,” he told NPR in an interview set to air on
Friday.
…
“When
I receive a final report, you know, we’ll be able to, I think, give a
comprehensive and best guess as to those motivations,” he said.
…
Yes,
even as the FBI says it does not know the
motivation for the hack President Obama has decided
what the motivation was.
Even
as Julian Assange insisted Russia was not responsible for the leaked DNC
emails, Obama knows better.
And
even as his own Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the administration found no
evidence of “technical interference” by the Russians, the president wants to
start a conflict.
Many
of social media had doubts that President Obama would deliver any type of
significant … READ ENTIRETY (With a month left in office ‘Mr. Red Line’ Obama
vows action against Russia; By Carmine
Sabia; BizPacReview; 12/16/16)
+++
How Russia Hacked into the DNC and NOT the RNC
12/17/2016 10:51 PM
Bloomberg quotes a cybersecurity expert saying the Missile Defense Agency’s use of
porn is concerning because “many pornographic websites are infected and
criminals and foreign intelligence services such as Russia’s use them to gain
access and harvest data.” [Blog Editor: The above quote is what Newbill
highlights from the Washington Times article below.]
Allen W. Dulles, former
director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) wrote in “The Craft of
Intelligence,” “sex and hard-headed intelligence operations rarely mix well.”
Perhaps the boys at the Pentagon need a refresher course.
This past week, the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency warned
its staff not to view porn on U.S. government computers. The Pentagon also released a report on April’s Secret Service Colombian
scandal. The two are connected.
In April, I said the Colombian
scandal exposed a national security problem, the epidemic of U.S. government
employees viewing porn — child porn — on government networks. I suggested
readers type “Transportation Security Administration,”
“U.S. State Department,” “Pentagon,” “Immigration and Customs Enforcement” and “child
porn” into Google’s search field to understand the scope. I neglected to
include “Missile Defense Agency.”
Bloomberg quotes a cybersecurity
expert saying the Missile Defense Agency’s use of
porn is concerning because “many pornographic websites are infected and
criminals and foreign intelligence services such as Russia’s use them to gain
access and harvest data.”
…
Thomas Jefferson once said he
feared for his country when he reflected that God was just. I, too, fear for my
country. No one is home in the Obama White House, and the Russians know this. Allen Dulles must be
rolling in his grave. Americans should be extremely concerned. -READ ENTIRETY (HANDRAHAN:
Executive branch porn problem; By Lori Handrahan; Washington
Times; 8/10/12)
+++
Is this Bill Clinton’s tactic?
12/20/2016 8:54 AM
Bill Clinton said Angry white men voted Trump in ... so is
Bill Clinton using Racism to divide the Arabs from the Middle East and any other
class of people from around the world with Money that will listen to he and the
Democrats and “DONATE” to the Clintons so they can continue with their Division
Politics??????????????
[Blog Editor: Unfortunately, Newbill didn’t leave link
associated with this thought. I stumbled upon the subject in another person’s
email. Which I provide below.]
Trump Fires Back at
Bill Clinton’s Insulting Remarks
…
While Hillary has remained
relatively quiet about her general election opponent since the upset heard
’round the world, her husband couldn’t resist getting his digs in. According to
an editorial in the Bedford-Pound Ridge Record Review, Bill Clinton indulged
shoppers at a New York bookstore with some thoughts about the election and the
next president.
“He doesn’t know much,” Clinton
said of Trump. “One thing he does know is how to get angry, white men to vote
for him.”
Clinton went on to express
astonishment that Trump would call him the day after the election with a
conciliatory tone. “Like it happened 15 years ago,” he scoffed.
On Twitter, the president-elect
responded to Clinton’s remarks by “correcting the record.”
“Bill Clinton stated that I called
him after the election,” Trump wrote Tuesday. “Wrong, he called me (with a very
nice congratulations). He ‘doesn’t know much,’ especially how to get people,
even with an unlimited budget, out to vote in the vital swing states (and
more). They focused on wrong states.”
…
…
why is it okay for Bill Clinton to talk about “angry white men” in this way?
Can you imagine if Trump lost and blamed “angry black men” for his defeat? When
did it become acceptable to talk about white voters like they’re a cancer on
the United States? Maybe if the Democrats didn’t treat whites as the root of
all Western evil, they would have won.
Frankly, Trump’s response to
Clinton was much friendlier than it could have been, and … READ ENTIRETY (Trump Fires Back at Bill Clinton’s Insulting
Remarks; By admin; The Mad Patriots; 12/20/16)
____________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text and links embraced by brackets are by the Editor.
© Tony Newbill
Blog Editor: Just a head's up. If you come across text seemingly missing letters or words. They are there. I couldn't get the blogger editor to work properly. If you highlight the empty portion the words will show up.
ReplyDelete