John R. Houk
© October 9, 2016
The Left Stream Media, many Establishment Republicans and
NeverTrumpers Conservatives have been hammering Donald Trump about his
deplorable womanizing remarks back in 2005. The Left Stream Media reporting on
Trump’s past is quite unsurprising.
I am very disappointed in Republicans and Conservatives that
have decided to abandon Trump because of a past moral issue but have been quite feckless in going after
Crooked Hillary and Sex-Predator Slick Willie – the Leftist wife/husband team –
for way over a quarter century.
Marxist Saul Alinsky and a young
Crooked Hillary
Below are two articles relating to Crooked Hillary’s
political ideology (Marxism) and the obvious Teflon fix that publicly came FBI
Director James Comey but was more than likely ordered by Leftist-in-Chief and
filtered on down through the Attorney General lackey Loretta Lynch.
And trust me, these two articles are just the tip of the
iceberg of the nefariousness of Crooked Hillary. The most recent exposé of documents
linked directly to Hillary nefariousness are not mentioned in this
post. Of course the Obama Administration and probably the Crooked Hillary
campaign are doing the bait and switch tactic without evidence of proof that the Russians did the hack then rewrote
the email dump to implicate the queen of corruption. Remember the Benghazi and
Obamacare lies before you believe the accusations implicating the Russians.
JRH 10/9/16
***************
Hillary Clinton, A Communist?
OCTOBER 7, 2016
If one looks into her strange past, one finds that Hillary
Rodham Clinton had a close relationship with a radical and
Communist/Socialist by the name of Saul Alinsky.
We will present a lot to be digested and we hope
people read this article all the way through and go to the sites shown so they
will know the truth about Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, both of
which seem to be so closely aligned with the Communist Party that any lines
that once divided them can no longer be found, and even their platforms are
nearly identical.
We showed how Hillary Clinton had close ties to Saul Alinsky
in previous articles here and here. Yes,
Hillary wrote and sat with Saul Alinsky to not only study his Communist
ideology, but also to use it in her quest for power and control, both of which
give the Communist ideology roots to grow from.
Let us show the basic principles of Hillary Clinton’s idol,
Saul Alinsky. Please take note of the 8 different ways that Communist Saul Alinsky
wants to “Change” the way the United States operates. Let us look very closely
at the ideas of Saul Alinsky and compare them to what both Hillary Rodham
Clinton and Obama have done in relation to the 8 ideas of Saul Alinsky.
Saul Alinsky stated, “There are 8 levels of control that
must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the
most important!”
1) Healthcare –
Control healthcare and you control the people.
2) Poverty –
Increase the Poverty level as high as possible. Poor people are easier to
control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to
live.
3) Debt –
Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase
taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun
Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government.
That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare –
Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education –
Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children
learn in school.
7) Religion –
Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class
Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will
cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the
support of the poor.
Now let us take a look at what has already happened and what
Hillary Clinton wants to do and what Obama and the Democratic Party has already
done. You have to remember that anytime words such as, but not limited to,
“Racist," "Feminist,” etc., are key words used by the Saul
Alinsky model to destroy your enemy and keep them fighting to disconnect those
ideas from them while those making the statements continue on with their ideas,
which, in most cases, do not help the poor or the United States.
Here is the connection between Hillary Clinton and her
idol, Saul Alinsky:
Healthcare - We see the first idea to be pushed
by the Alinsky Communist idea is to “Control Healthcare.” Remember, when
Hillary Clinton was First Lady, she pushed for a nationwide Healthcare system,
exactly what Alinsky outlined to begin the creation of the Socialist/Communist
state. We should make a strong note: President Obama was also a strong advocate
of the Alinsky model. Today, we have the Obamacare joke of
healthcare, but it does follow the Saul Alinsky ideology.
Poverty – Today, we see that more people live in
poverty in the United States, and this has increased since Obama took office,
so here we can clearly see that the second action in the Alinsky model is being
pursued by Obama and we can rest assured that Hillary Clinton will push this
even higher if she is elected; after all, she supports the Alinsky ideology.
Debt – The debt of our nation has moved into
territory that has never been seen before during the entire history of the
United States. Hillary Clinton wants to continue on this same line of
action by increasing the burden by keeping the debt rising so she can control
all of our lives. Hillary Clinton also shouted very loudly on the stage; “We
will raise the taxes on the middle class.” Strangely, the people
cheered!
Gun Control – This is so far the hardest to
complete, but Obama has done all he can, including coming up with illegal
Executive Actions that stifle the ownership of guns because of his actions. But
Hillary Clinton stated that she would like to see “common sense” gun control,
which is code for taking all the guns from the people. Hillary Clinton has
stated that, “… I
would like to see gun control actions like the Australians have.” That would
mean total confiscation of guns and jail time for anyone who does not comply
with the government demand to turn your guns in. Hillary Clinton can do
this by placing Supreme Court Justices that will say the Second Amendment does
not apply to the average citizen - check out the people she will consider for
Supreme Court Justices: they all are AGAINST guns.
Welfare – This will and has been growing since
Obama has been president. Under Hillary Clinton, it will continue to grow,
since she has stated this in many ways and will increase the welfare
rolls, just like Alinsky states. Hillary Clinton will bring in many more
people from the Middle East and place them all on the welfare
rolls, giving them no opportunity to find jobs and by giving
them food, housing, and income, just like her idol Saul Alinsky outlines in his
8 levels of control.
Education – Hillary Clinton has clearly stated
in her book, It
Take A Village, “I believe the primary role of the
state is to teach, train and raise the children. Parents have a secondary
role.”
Here Hillary Clinton shows very plainly that she will use
the Communist/Socialist Saul Alinsky ideology to “educate” the children, which
is actually brainwashing the children to think that they have to work for the
Government to pay for their education. This alone should make many parents
consider not to vote for this lady who only wants the parents to have a
secondary role to their children and allow the government to have the primary
role. This is not the “American” way to Freedom and pursuit of happiness.
Religion – This is the most profound act of
hatred by the current administration, and Hillary Clinton will follow through
with this ideology, just like Obama is doing now. Before 2009, our nation
could pray at football games, we could place a cross on public property, we
could worship our beliefs, which are, of the majority, Christian. Today,
our nation has moved away from the old phrase "God and Country."
Today, it is "Politics and country." Our nation was founded on the
belief that God is our creator, and that is clearly displayed through the
Declaration of Independence. Some will come out and say that is not right
because the Constitution says the government cannot support any religion.
That would be a very false statement, since the very idea was that the Government
cannot say we have only one religion, and that is the one the government says
it is. Freedom of religion was developed to make sure the government did
not dictate what religion the people had to abide by: that is what England did,
and the founding fathers did not want the government to dictate what religion
to force upon the people. It also did not mean that the government would
make religion be evil and not accepted by the government, as it has done under
the Obama administration. This would be even worse under a Hillary Clinton
administration.
Class warfare – We can already see this one from
Obama and Hillary Clinton doubling down and saying that the rich have to
pay their fair share, meaning, as did Saul Alinsky, that they have to pay more
until they become poor. The fact that Hillary Clinton is going to continue on
with the “Class Warfare" is not to be doubted for one minute as
she does not hide this at all, saying those who make the most should
pay the most. Hillary Clinton will most assuredly divide the nation even more
than Obama has, and this will never be settled until the United States is so
divided that the government will have to intervene to “separate” what they
created: a police state.
Showing and comparing these 8 items and breaking them down
shows that, without a doubt, Obama, who also studied Saul Alinsky, began the
division needed to make the Communist ideology work, and Hillary Clinton
will continue it. If you wish to see our nation coming together like it
did before Obama got into office, do not vote for Hillary Clinton.
How much does the Communist Party of America support Hillary
Clinton? That is perhaps the most interesting question we could ask. Let
us look at an article
exposing the fact that the Communist Party supports Hillary Clinton.
This article describes what the Communist Party USA
likes about her and why it supports her entirely.
“The Communist Party USA may
not control many actual votes, but what they lack in support is made up for in
enthusiasm.
That passion was in full
display with a seven-person team of “reporters” covering their national
political convention last month. And their convention was the Democratic
National Convention that nominated Hillary Rodham Clinton as their undisputed
candidate for president of the United States.”
Some of the Communist Party USA's talking points sound an
awful lot like Hillary Clinton’s talking points...or is that the other way
around? In either case, the points are eerily similar. Let’s check some
excerpts from the Communist Party’s
article on that.
“Donald Trump steals wages.
He’d pick your pocket in a New York minute. He lies and spreads hate. He’s a
racist and a bully.”
“Do not underestimate Trump
and the Republicans. While the establishment GOP was surprised by the
successful insurgency of so-called outsider Trump, they are united in purpose:
delivering more inequality, more misery, more instability and violence against
working-class people of all races, genders, religions and sexual orientations.
They are united with giant corporations and the billionaire class in their
drive to lower wages and living conditions and increase their profits and
power.”
“With Senator Bernie Sanders
endorsing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the message was loud and clear,
“We’re stronger together.” That is what it will take to win in November.”
“The union movement,
communities of color, students, women, progressives and the newborn “political
revolution” can help generate voter enthusiasm by talking and tweeting about
Clinton and the issues. Challenging sexism is a must as well as racism, which
has been a coded (and overt) staple of presidential elections for decades.”
“Winning in a landslide” is
needed now more than ever, and that landslide for Clinton could swing control
of the Senate to Democrats, and other potential positive effects could be felt
on the ‘down ballot’ congressional and state races.”
Wait, isn’t that what the Democratic Party said - well maybe
in different words? It does look like Hillary Clinton has taken advice
from the Communist Party of the USA with her lines. All this time and the
people have been led to believe that Hillary Clinton was the first to use the
words "racism," "sexism," and so on. Please just look at
what the Communist Party states: if it were not on their web site, one would
think it had been written by the Clinton Campaign.
Let us look at a direct quote of the Communist Party USA
paper that describes Hillary Clinton’s pick for her running mate, Tim Kaine:
this is where it gets weird, as the Communist Party not only fully supports and
maybe helps Hillary Clinton, but also seems to accept her VP, Tim Kaine, with
open arms.
“Joseph Farah, the founder of
WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in his youth, said the
CPUSA’s coverage was so effusive in its enthusiasm it put MSNBC to shame.
“Back in the day when
Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated by the party as
presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years, the U.S.
Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he said. “But, in recent
years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with the
Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”
It would seem that Hillary Clinton is either working with
the Communist Party USA, or they are working with her. No one can really
distinguish the lines between them, as they are so close to each other that
lines between Democrats and Communists have seemingly vanished since, in
2009, they pushed voters toward Obama and keep pushing the Democrats into
the now very blurred lines between the old Democratic Party and the current
Communist/Democratic Party today. But check it out for yourself below.
“The Communists, who for
decades ran their own candidates for president and vice president but supported
Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, don’t just like Hillary and Bernie. The party
also gave a big thumbs-up to Clinton’s running mate, Tim Kaine.
“He’s a great choice,” wrote
staffer Larry Rubin on the first day of the convention. “Kaine pushed the
political envelope of Virginia, an erstwhile red southern state, in a
progressive direction – and won! He was elected mayor of Richmond, then
governor of the state and then senator. Everyone agrees: he’s a sincere, nice
guy.”
No this should be enough to show that our nation
would become totally Socialist leaning heavily towards Communism under Hillary
Rodham Clinton, due to Democrats continuing on with their ideas from 1856 when
they were the party of slavery. Wait, maybe they really want to bring slavery
back, but in the form of government hand outs! Just check out someone else’s
comments on how the Democrats have moved more toward the Communist side than to
the Freedom side.
“David Kupelian, managing
editor of WND.com, had this to say earlier this year
in a commentary on the shrinking divide between the two parties:
“Amazing as it may seem, Barack Obama has dragged the entire Democratic
Party so far leftward over the past seven-plus years that today’s Democratic
Party has become almost indistinguishable from the Communist Party.
“If that sounds hyperbolic to
you, just stop reading right now and pull up the CPUSA’s website,” he
added. “Spend some time reading and digesting it. Try to discern any major
differences between the Communist Party’s concerns, sensibilities and solutions
– on issues from ‘gay’ rights, to unfettered immigration, to renewable energy,
to wealth redistribution, to condemning cops as racist, to universal health
care – and those of today’s Democratic Party.”
The interest has been largely
fueled by Clinton’s suppressed and later released 92-page senior thesis for
Wellesley College offering an extensive, largely positive critique of Alinsky
and his work.
Hillary Clinton’s association
with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when Obama was just 8 years
old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis, a loyal Communist
Party activist.
Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley
College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An Analysis of the
Alinsky Model.”
The thesis received attention when it was released after the Bill Clinton
presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the White House requested that
Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for Radicals”
author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies.”
This covers a lot, but it has to be shown in order to link it all
together to illustrate the closeness of the Communist and Democratic Party and
how it may also link Hillary Clinton to being a communist simply by
allowing this type of hyperbole to be stated. We show just what has to be
shown, and it makes a good connection to the Hillary Clinton campaign, which
follows the Communist Party USA ideology almost to a tee. That in and of
itself should create a firewall between the White House and Hillary Clinton.
If she is elected, the nation built by our forefathers will
have failed, due to the ignorance of seeing what is near the tip of our noses.
If you believe in the Freedom, the Constitution, and our United States, then
you will pass this on to all you know and make it go viral to show facts that
have to be shown here because the Lame Stream Media will never show, it as they
are part of the problem.
“Clinton was said to have met
with Alinsky several times in 1968, when she was writing her thesis. In her
most recent memoir, Clinton wrote that she rejected a job offer from Alinsky to
instead attend law school.
Last year, WND
found that long after Alinsky’s death in June 1972, a group Clinton co-chaired
maintained a working relationship with Alinsky’s main community organizing
outfit, the Industrial Areas Foundation, or IAF. The
partnership extended into the 1990s and yielded influence over the education
policy of the Bill Clinton presidency, it can now be disclosed. Founded by
Alinsky in 1940 and run by him until his death, the IAF is a national
community-organizing network established to implement Alinsky’s expansive
organizing agenda. After Alinsky’s death, the IAF was taken over by his
longtime associate and designated successor, Ed Chambers, who became the
group’s executive director.
Dick Morris, a former top
political adviser to Bill Clinton both as governor of Arkansas and as
president, noted to WND that education reform “is the key issue Hillary Clinton
used to propel herself independently to the forefront of Arkansas politics
during Bill’s governorship.”
“The revelation of how
closely linked her efforts were back in the 80s – and have been since – to an
Alinsky radical front group is deeply disturbing and expands our understanding
of Hillary’s fundamental radicalism and commitment to the new left of Saul
Alinsky,” Morris said.
David Horowitz, whose parents
were members of the Communist Party and who himself became a leader in the new
left movement of the 1960s and 1970s before rejecting it, said the revelation
is significant though not surprising.
“When radicals set out to
fundamentally transform a society, the first institution they attack is the
educational system which under their influence becomes a system of
indoctrination in radical ideas,” he told WND.
Interestingly, the Communist
Party USA has not changed its stripes in any significant way. It hasn’t walked
back its 100 percent commitment to Communism. What has changed is the
Democratic Party.
The drift leftward hit warp
speed beginning in the 1990s, according to Farah. That’s the year Bernie
Sanders was first elected to Congress and founded the Congressional Progressive
Caucus.
“One of his first actions in
Congress was to found the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was partnered
with the Democratic Socialists of America,” recounts Farah. “No surprise there,
because most Americans have no idea of what the Congressional Progressive
Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America are really all about.”
Farah reported on the antics
of the caucus in 1998.
“Back then the Congressional
Progressive Caucus shared a website with the DSA,” he wrote. “In other words,
these two organizations, one government-funded and the other a tax-exempt
nonprofit, were of like mind and on the same page politically. What I found
back then was astonishing – even for me. On this shared website, that was
quickly scrubbed after I exposed it, was a collection of songs I can almost
hear Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and other members of the Congressional
Progressive Caucus singing in harmony. One of my favorites back then – – was
“Red Revolution” sung to the tune of “Red, Red Robbin.”
“For those not trained in the
lingo of communism, the dictionary definition of ‘bourgeoisie,’ is, and I
quote: ‘(in Marxist theory) the class that, in contrast to the proletariat or
wage-earning class, is primarily concerned with property values,'” wrote Farah.
“If you’ve got property, if you’re part of the middle class, these people not
only want to raise your taxes, they want to kill you with knives and guns!”
Meanwhile, an email sent out
by the Communist Party USA over the weekend had this to say: “The 2016
elections are in full swing. Many of our districts and clubs and members are
actively participating in the campaign to strike a blow to the extreme right
and defeat Donald Trump and other down ballot GOP extremists. If you’re not yet
involved, there are many ways to get connected with labor and our allies,
especially in the key battleground states and in targeted congressional and
state legislative races. But no matter where you live you can be part of this
exciting election. We can defeat Trump, oust right-wing majorities in Congress
and statehouses while also building powerful labor-led people’s movements, advancing
a progressive agenda and political independence at the grassroots. We have some
great tools, beginning with People’s World daily (sic) Marxist analysis.”
(Source)
__________________
FBI agents are
ready to revolt over the cozy Clinton probe
By Paul Sperry
October 6, 2016
Originally New
York Post
Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged
the bureau’s reputation for uncompromising investigations with his “cowardly”
whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of
classified information using an unauthorized private e-mail server.
Feeling the heat from congressional critics, Comey last week argued
that the case was investigated by career FBI agents, “So if I blew it, they
blew it, too.”
But agents say Comey tied investigators’ hands by agreeing to
unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her
aides that limited their investigation.
“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my
interviews,” said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s
computer-investigations unit.
Instead of going to prosecutors and insisting on using grand jury
leverage to compel testimony and seize evidence, Comey allowed immunity for
several key witnesses, including potential targets.
The immunity agreements came with outrageous side deals, including
preventing agents from searching for any documents on a Dell laptop owned by
former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills generated after Jan. 31, 2015, when
she communicated with the server administrator who destroyed subpoenaed
e-mails.
Comey also agreed to have Mills’ laptop destroyed after the restricted
search, denying Congress the chance to look at it and making the FBI an
accomplice to the destruction of evidence.
Comey’s immunized witnesses nonetheless suffered chronic lapses in
memory, made unsubstantiated claims of attorney-client privilege upon tougher
questioning and at least two gave demonstrably false statements. And yet Comey
indulged it all.
What’s more, Comey cut a deal to give Clinton a “voluntary” witness
interview on a major holiday, and even let her ex-chief of staff sit in on the
interview as a lawyer, even though she, too, was under investigation.
Clinton’s interview, the culmination of a yearlong investigation,
lasted just 3 ½ hours. Despite some 40 bouts of amnesia, she wasn’t called back for
questioning; and three days later, Comey cleared her of criminal wrongdoing.
“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a
long time,” Hughes said. “I hold director Comey responsible.”
Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: “Comey has singlehandedly
ruined the reputation of the organization.”
The accommodations afforded Clinton and her aides are “unprecedented,”
Biasello added, “which is another way of saying this outcome was by design.” He
called Comey’s decision not to seek charges “cowardly.”
“Each month for 27 years, I received oral and computer admonishments
concerning the proper protocol for handling top secret and other classified
material, and was informed of the harsh penalties, to include prosecution and
incarceration” for mishandling such material, he pointed out. “Had myself or my
colleagues engaged in behavior of the magnitude of Hillary Clinton, as
described by Comey, we would be serving time in Leavenworth.”
Former FBI official I.C. Smith knows a thing or two about Clinton
corruption. After working at FBI headquarters as a section chief in the
National Security Division, he retired as special agent in charge of the Little
Rock, Ark., field office, where he investigated top Clinton fund-raisers for
public corruption and even Chinese espionage.
“FBI agents upset with Comey’s decision have every reason to feel that
way,” Smith said. “Clearly there was a different standard applied to Clinton.”
“I have no doubt resourceful prosecutors and FBI agents could have come
up with some charge that she would have been subject to prosecution,” the
25-year veteran added. “What she did is absolutely abhorrent for anyone who has
access to classified information.”
Smith said Congress should subpoena the case’s agents to testify about
the direction they received from Comey and their supervisors: “It would be
interesting to see what the results would be if those involved with the
investigation were questioned under oath.”
Comey made the 25 agents who worked on the case sign nondisclosure
agreements. But others say morale has sunk inside the bureau.
“The director is giving the bureau a bad rap with all the gaps in the
investigation,” one agent in the Washington field office said. “There’s a
perception that the FBI has been politicized and let down the country.”
Comey has turned a once-proud institution known for its independence
into one that bows to election pressure, hands out political immunity to
candidates and effectively pardons their co-conspirators. He’s turned the FBI
into the Federal Bureau of Immunity and lost the trust and respect of not only
his agents but the country at large. He ought to step down.
Paul Sperry,
formerly Washington bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily, is author of
“Infiltration.”
Also see:
______________
This is the Crooked Hillary too Many Want
to be POTUS
John R. Houk
© October 9, 2016
_______________
Hillary Clinton, A Communist?
_____________
FBI agents are ready to
revolt over the cozy Clinton probe
About Counter Jihad Report
There
is an urgent need for the public to become informed about the Global Islamic
Jihad Movement. We must demand from our leaders that they become familiar with
Islamic Law and jihadist ideology so that our counterterrorism policies can
better protect us from this growing threat.
This
blog is mainly a news aggregating site but also includes an extensive library
of resources for studying Islam and networking with other Counter Jihad
activists. My goal has been to pull from a variety of the most trusted and
reliable sources to educate the public on the counter jihad movement. The many
RSS feeds and counterjihad twitter feed in the sidebar are meant to provide a
time saving jumping off point to access all the headlines and breaking news.
My
Interest in Islamic Jihad stems from the 1983 Hezbollah truck bombing of
the U.S. Embassy in Beirut in which my cousin, Ken Haas, was killed. Ken left a
career as a philosophy professor to work for the CIA and was the Station Chief
in Beirut. He and his wife of one year had just finished lunch in Ken’s
office at the Embassy and kissed good-bye. She had
driven back to their apartment where she heard the explosion.
After several agonizing days of waiting while rescuers sifted through the
wreckage it was finally revealed that Ken had died instantly at his
desk.
In
all, 63 people were killed,
17 of whom were Americans. The entire U.S. Central Intelligence Agency Middle
Eastern contingent was killed setting our intelligence back for years. Hezbollah had
… READ
THE REST
No comments:
Post a Comment