Tony Newbill examines Crooked Hillary insinuated her goals
in the matrix of a clandestine government. (Part One can be read HERE.)
JRH 7/19/16
*******************
Newbill Conspiracy insights & Propositions Part 2
Tony Newbill
Posted July 19, 2016
Wed 7/13/2016 10:07
AM
Hilary is 2
Candidates in One
Hilary is 2 Candidates in One, first she’s a candidate for
POTUS and then She’s a candidate for the “Deep State” and this is where the
problem with maintaining USA Sovereignty exists.
The Deep State is who gave Hilary a Pass on accountability
to the Civilians of the USA thus making US Citizens Subjects of the DEEP STATE!!!!!
These 2 links give insight to the Concept that Hilary Clinton is 2 candidates in one:
Deep State America
[Blog Editor: Newbill also used the last two links are
also used
as a comment to the dual post “Deep State
USA” which includes the Deep State Conspiracy thoughts of Daniel
Gladstein. Newbill has several comments on that post largely related to
Gladstein’s thoughts. Newbill’s comments to the Deep State post will show in a
later blog post because they are a little different than here even though the
links are the same.]
It has frequently been alleged that the modern Turkish Republic operates
on two levels. It has a parliamentary democracy complete with a constitution
and regular elections, but there also exists a secret government that has been
referred to as the “deep
state,” in Turkish “Derin Devlet.”
The concept of “deep state” has recently become
fashionable to a certain extent, particularly to explain the
persistence of traditional political alignments when confronted by the recent
revolutions in parts of the Middle East and Eastern Europe. For those who
believe in the existence of the deep state, there are a number of institutional
as well as extralegal relationships that might suggest its presence.
Some believe that this deep state arose out of a secret NATO operation
called “Gladio,” which created an infrastructure for so-called “stay behind
operations” if Western Europe were to be overrun by the Soviet Union and its
allies. There is a certain logic to that assumption, as a deep state has to be
organized around a center of official and publicly accepted power, which means
it normally includes senior officials of the police and intelligence services
as well as the military. …
…
As all governments—sometimes for good reasons—engage in concealment
of their more questionable activities, or even resort to out and out deception,
one must ask how the deep state differs. While an elected government might
sometimes engage in activity that is legally questionable, there is normally
some plausible pretext employed to cover up or explain the act.
But for players in the deep state, there is no accountability and no
legal limit. Everything is based on self-interest, justified through an
assertion of patriotism and the national interest. …
…
If all this sounds familiar to an American reader, it should, and given
some local idiosyncrasies, it invites the question whether the United States of
America has its own deep state.
…
In truth America’s deep state is, not unlike Turkey’s, a hybrid creature
that operates along a New York to Washington axis. Where the Turks engage in
criminal activity to fund themselves, the Washington elite instead turns to
banksters, lobbyists, and defense contractors, operating much more in the open
and, ostensibly, legally. U.S.-style deep state includes all the obvious
parties, both public and private, who benefit from the status quo:
including key players in the police and intelligence agencies, the
military, the treasury and justice departments, and the judiciary. It is
structured to materially reward those who play along with the charade, and the
glue to accomplish that ultimately comes from Wall Street. “Financial
services” might well be considered the epicenter of the entire process. Even
though government is needed to implement desired policies, the banksters
comprise the truly essential element, capable of providing genuine rewards for
compliance. As corporate interests increasingly own the media, little dissent
comes from the Fourth Estate as the process plays out, while many of the
proliferating Washington think tanks that provide deep state “intellectual”
credibility are …
READ
ENTIRETY (Deep State America: Democracy is
often subverted by special interests operating behind the scenes; By PHILIP GIRALDI; American
Conservative; 7/30/15)
Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary
Clinton's State Department
Even by the standards of arms deals
between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium
of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth
of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle
East.
Israeli officials were agitated,
reportedly complaining to the Obama
administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked
disrupting the region's fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide
with the State Department’s documented concerns about
the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.
…
These were not the only
relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary
Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at
least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she
has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months
before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that
manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to
acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000
to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.
The Saudi deal was one of dozens of
arms sales approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that placed weapons
in the hands of governments that had also donated money to the Clinton family
philanthropic empire, an International Business Times investigation has found.
Under Clinton's leadership, the
State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20
nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according
to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure --
derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of
State (from October 2010 to September 2012) -- represented nearly double the
value of American arms sales made to those countries and approved by the State
Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.
The Clinton-led State Department
also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the
countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent
increase in completed sales to
those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. These
extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that
accompanied Obama’s arrival in the White House. The 143 percent increase in
U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase
in such sales to all countries over the same time period.
American defense contractors also
donated to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state
and in some cases made personal payments to Bill Clinton for speaking engagements.
Such firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth
of Pentagon-negotiated deals that were authorized by the Clinton State
Department between 2009 and 2012.
…
…
She noted that “UAE-based donors have provided financial support to a variety
of terrorist groups.” All of these countries donated to the Clinton Foundation
and received increased weapons export authorizations from the Clinton-run State
Department.
… READ ENTIRETY (Clinton
Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department; By DAVID SIROTA
and ANDREW PEREZ;
IBT; 5/26/15)
This link shows how the DEEP STATE is Protecting Hilary
Clinton: [Blog Editor: The link below is
actually a comment to the article entitled ‘Loretta Lynch Ducks 74 Questions From Congress: “Either Avoiding
Appearances or Protecting Hillary”’. The identity of the commenter is “Tommy”.
This means Tony Newbill and Tommy are one and the same. Since “Newbill” is a pseudonym,
the mystery: has the anonymity been revealed? Or is it another pseudonym? The
mystery continues. After the comment link is an excerpt from the actual article
which I believe is Newbill’s actual intention.]
Did Attorney General Loretta Lynch
lie about or obfuscate her role in clearing Hillary in the investigations
concerning the handling of classified emails on her private server?
Is there a quid pro quo among the
two women, in which Lynch could have been promised a role in the next Clinton
Administration in exchange for her help in calling off potential criminal
charges that might derail Hillary’s campaign.
Lynch claims there is no such
relationship. But she also refused to answer at least 74 of Congress’ questions
about her private meeting with former President Bill Clinton and her
relationship with the Clintons and/or their staff.
Recall, that the announcement that
Hillary was off the hook, as it were, came immediately after the Attorney General and former president
met.
As The Daily Caller reported
at the time:
Department of Justice officials
filed a motion in federal court late Wednesday seeking a 27-month delay in
producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s
four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a
closely allied public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.
…
As example to this, Loretta Lynch
refused an entire line of questions from Rep. Jason Chaffetz about whether or
not it was hypothetically legal or illegal to retain classified information.
Despite the straightforward nature
of this questioning, Attorney General Lynch refused to even acknowledge whether
or not it is illegal to lie under oath.
Wow. This is stonewalling of …
READ
ENTIRETY (Loretta Lynch Ducks 74 Questions From
Congress: “Either Avoiding Appearances or Protecting Hillary”; By Mac Slavo; SHTFplan.com;
7/13/16)
++++++++++
Fri 7/15/2016 12:45
PM
Hilary's Red and Blue
Camps Plan to deal with peoples conflicting Religious views
Hilary’s Red and Blue Camps Plan to deal with peoples
conflicting Religious views:
[Blog Editor: The
tiny url is to a Youtube post that demonstrates that Hillary Clinton intends to
continue Barack Obama’s fundamental transformation of the USA away from
American values by further diluting the Christian faith’s moral standards.]
Posted by NicholasPOGM
Published on May 26, 2015
As I stated in the video, before
making public statements, political candidates do demographic research so as to
see what the public will accept or reject. And this is especially true with
presidential campaigns! What Hillary Clinton says during a campaign speech
confirms the powers that be, know for a fact that the majority of the churches
in America no longer bow to Jesus, His Word, or even common sense for that
matter! Her comments CONFIRM the leaders in the USA will remove religious
liberty soon! The fact they have proof there will be little opposition is the
green light they have been looking for.
(original video)
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4220594877001/same-sex-marriage-case-raising-religious-liberty-concerns/?#sp=show-clips
(original video)
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4220594877001/same-sex-marriage-case-raising-religious-liberty-concerns/?#sp=show-clips
[Blog Editor: This
tiny url is to a Youtube video in which Hillary Clinton says she believes
Americans need “Adult Camps” to teach them how to relate to cultural
socio-religious mores acceptable to modernity (i.e. transform minds). Hmm…
Crooked Hillary’s speech should make you think of Communist Chinese
re-education camps or old Soviet
re-education camps]
Posted by DTAShieldOFaith
Published on Apr 14, 2015
At an event for camp professionals,
Hillary Clinton pitches camp for grownups, where the "red" and
"blue" cabins would have no choice but to work together.
.All praises to Yahawah Bahasham Yahawashi Shalawam ahchyam Double Honors to the Apostles and Elders of GMS
.All praises to Yahawah Bahasham Yahawashi Shalawam ahchyam Double Honors to the Apostles and Elders of GMS
(The Elect) around the world teaching the word in sincerely and truth
And we have General Wesley Clark saying the same kind of
thing about Camps:
[Blog Editor: I am
guessing the link about General Clark suggesting that radicalized Muslims be
rounded up and placed in camps is Newbill’s shot at being fair and balanced.
Clark is a Leftist in the Dem Party thus making his statement against Muslim be
castigated by Obama and the current Crooked Hillary campaign. Think of the
clamor if Trump made such a statement! I sense the point Newbill is reaching
for is the willingness of Dems to form re-education camps – PERIOD.]
Retired general and former
Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday called for World War
II-style internment camps to be revived for “disloyal Americans.” In an interview with MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts in the wake of
the mass shooting in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Clark said that during World
War II, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States,
we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were
prisoners of war.”
He called for a revival of
internment camps to help combat Muslim extremism, saying, “If these people
are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal
to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s
our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the
duration of the conflict.”
… READ
THE REST (Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for
“Radicalized” Americans; By Murtaza Hussain;
The
Intercept; 7/20/15 9:12 a.m.)
And there has been a lot of debate within the Policy making
positions of authority regarding Radical Religious people, https://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf
(U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate
Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment
7 April 2009
(U) Prepared by the Extremism and
Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division.
Coordinated with the FBI.
(U) Scope
(U//FOUO) This product is one of
a series of intelligence assessments published by the Extremism and
Radicalization Branch to facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon
of violent radicalization in the United States. The information is provided to
federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement
officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to
terrorist attacks against the United States. Federal efforts to influence
domestic public opinion must be conducted in an overt and transparent manner,
clearly identifying United States Government sponsorship.
…
(U) Key Findings
(U//LES) The DHS/Office of
Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic
rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing
extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several
emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African
American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and
recruitment.
— (U//LES) Threats from white
supremacist and violent antigovernment groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical
and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts. Nevertheless, the
consequences of a prolonged economic downturn—including real estate
foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit—could create a
fertile recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in
confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those
in the past.
— (U//LES) Rightwing extremists
have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and
are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing
supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they
have not yet turned to attack planning.
(U//FOUO) The current economic
and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing
extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession,
criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power
and sovereignty by other … READ THE REST (Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling
Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment; By Homeland Security
Department – posted by Federation of
American Scientists (FAS); Unclassified version released
4/7/09)
And Justice Scalia [was] saying we
will see Camps in the USA, so it seems there is an Ideology within the
hierarchy of Government of this train of thought: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/justice-antonin-scalia-says-world-war-ii-style-internment-camps-could-happen-again/article/2543424
Justice Antonin Scalia predicts
that the Supreme Court will
eventually authorize another a wartime abuse of civil rights such as the
internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II.
"You are kidding yourself if
you think the same thing will not happen again," Scalia told the
University of Hawaii law school while discussing Korematsu v. United States,
the ruling in which the court gave its imprimatur to the internment camps.
The local Associated Press report quotes
Scalia as using a Latin phrase that means "in times of war, the laws fall
silent," to explain why the court erred in that decision and will do so
again.
__________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Any information enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
© Tony Newbill Content
No comments:
Post a Comment