© November 13, 2019
Photo capture of
website exposing Origins of Islamic Culture. CLICK HERE then scroll to bottom of
page to click image info.
At my SlantRight 2.0 blog I have comments
set for moderation ONLY. The reason most comment are of a spam advertising nature
– some product oriented and some just vulgar porn. Along that same line I typically
IGNORE off the bat when a comment is authored by “Anonymous”. Once in a while out
of the corner of my eye I might an “Anonymous” commenter with a valid comment
to a post – that person would get lucky and get added as a comment. BUT that
would be few and far between and especially RARE.
Here is the reason for going over comment practices on the SlantRight
2.0 blog. I actually got a comment to moderate from an individual
self-identified as “mohammedbasha”. If you go to mohammedbasha’s Blogger profile page
the info on identity is quite pseudonymous yet quite obviously the image of a
Muslim Apologist. In case you are unaware, like American Dems Muslim Apologists
at worst outright lie or at best so brainwashed by their religious leaders are
sadly deceived to believe infamous actions are good for humanity. Here is a
copy and paste of mohammedbasha’s Blogger profile page:
My blogs
Contact me
On Blogger since October 2019
About me
Industry: Religion
Occupation: Consultant
Since mohammedbasha was good enough to not post “anonymous”
I first examined the post being commented on which is “Where do You
Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?” posted on 11/4/17. The purpose of that post hopefully
summed up in these excerpts:
On 11/2 I vented a bit about the
hypocrisy of the Mainstream Media (MSM) reporting like wimps on the Islamic
terrorist attack by Sayfullo Saipov in Manhattan. Saipov killed eight and injured many others
on Halloween for Allah, Muhammad and ISIS.
I shared the blog post on the G+
Community Boycott!🚫CNN, MSNBC & LIBERAL MEDIA (among
other Communities and Groups). Two Community commenters had an interesting
enough dialogue that I have decided to cross post most of it as a standalone
post. The dialogue was between “ron
keramer” and “Christina
Johnston”.
You can definitely read the ire I had with Muslims acting on
Islamic revered writing in the embedded links in the first paragraph. Unfortunately
G+ Communities as a social platform no longer exist ergo you cannot read those
sources. The next paragraph of “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?”
clarifies the existence of the hypocrisy that Muslim Apologists and Multicultural
Leftists hold against the critics of Islam:
The title of the post is “I Am
Islamorgizo not Islamophobic”. The context of the post is being weary of
the MSM insisting anyone that is critical of Islam is an Islamophobic racist.
So, I found a Greek word that connotates a fixed anger akin to settled
opposition. That Greek word is orgízō. Just as Multiculturalists and
Islamic Apologists hooked “Islam” with the Greek derivative for “phobia” to
form Islamophobe, I connected Islam with orgízō to create Islamorgizo –
a settled angry opposition to Islam. Then I explained the reason why Islam
deserves settled angry opposition not only for its revered writings justifying
violence against non-Muslims, but also to show contrasting Quran and the Bible
that Islam is specifically an Antichrist religion. Incidentally, Islam is the
ONLY non-Christian religion that specifically denies the centrality of the
Christian faith. You’ll have to read “I Am Islamorgizo not Islamophobic”
for the details.
Sadly, to my knowledge, the term “Islamorgizo” has
never caught on to counter calling critics of Islam Islamophobes. Allow me to
reiterate that I do not have an irrational fear Islam but I have an angry
opposition for what Islam stands for in that socio-political religion’s obsessed
violent hatred of all things non-Islamic with the specific labelling of the “People
of the Book” (meaning the Holy Bible) as the people who have
twisted the so-called original revered writings (meaning the Quran that never existed in any form prior to the
recollections of Muhammad’s fellow pillagers, rapists and slavers put their leader’s sayings to pen and paper) – Interesting
afterthought: “The Myth: Muhammad Would
Never Approve of Rape – DEBUNKED”) of Islam’s Allah.
Never Approve of Rape – DEBUNKED”) of Islam’s Allah.
With all the above embedded links a non-Muslim – especially a
Jew and Christian – should be concerned with the socio-political religion known
as Islam, below is the brief comment (not approved to be posted to “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?”)
by mohammedbash:
Misconceptions About Islam is a website that misrepresents
by misleading readers about what Islam’s revered writings stipulate AND what
history records. Here’s an excerpt example:
Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) Founded Islam?
It’s been Misconceptions About
Islam and misunderstood by many that Islam was founded by Prophet Muhammed
around 1400 years ago in the middle of Arabia. But the truth is advent of Islam
dated since origin of Adam, who was the first human being to worship the one
and only God. Prophets who came later were also Muslims and propagated Allah is
the true creator with no companions or children. A true Muslim submits self to
the true God and accept Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) as his final messenger. [Blog
Editor: A demonic lie if communicated by Quran, it was only by the lips of Muhammed
later recorded into writing by a follower (or followers) of Muhammed into
writing after the false prophet’s death in 632 AD (or CE for secular minded
scholars).]
Allah; the God for Muslims Only?
The Real Meaning of the word Allah
is “One True God” in Arabic. It also refers to the one who created heavens,
earth, sea, mountain and everything that stays in the universe. Even Arabic
speaking Jews & Christians refer God with the name of Allah. So essentially
our faith/belief is up on one and only powerful God though cited with multiple
names (Allah, Yahweh or God the Father)
Blog Editor: I am convinced the Muslim faith are taught
and believe “Allah” means “One True God”. But that literally is not accurate.
From YourDictionary.com:
Allah: Islam – God
Origin of Allah
Arabic All?h from al,
the + il?h, god, akin to Classical Hebrew (language) eloah, God (citing:
Webster's New World College Dictionary, Fifth Edition Copyright © 2014 by
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)
Allah: God, especially in Islam.
Origin of Allah
Arabic allāh al- the
'ilāh god ℵl
(citing: THE AMERICAN HERITAGE® DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE,
FIFTH EDITION by the Editors of the American Heritage Dictionaries. Copyright ©
2016, 2011 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)
Of more interest on “Allah” from webpage entitled, The pagan origin of the word, "Allah":
…
The pre-Islamic origin of
"Allah"
1.
There is absolutely no question that Allah was worshipped by the pagan
Arabs as one of many polytheistic gods.
2.
Allah was worshipped in the Kabah at Mecca before Muhammad was born.
Muhammad merely proclaimed a god the Meccans were already familiar with. The
pagan Arabs never accused Muhammad of preaching a different Allah than the one
they already worshipped.
3.
Many scholars say "Allah" is derived from a compound Arabic
word, AL + ILAH = Allah. "Ilah" in Arabic is "God" and
"Al" in Arabic is a definite article like our word "the".
So from an English equivalent "Allah" comes from "The +
God". Others, like Arthur Jeffery say, "The common theory is that it
is formed from ilah, the common word for a god, and the article al-; thus
al-ilah, the god," becomes Allah, "God." This theory, however,
is untenable. In fact, the name is one of the words borrowed into the language
in pre-Islamic times from Aramaic." (Islam: Muhammad and His Religion,
Arthur Jeffery, 1958, p 85)
4.
Although "Allah" has become known as the proper name for the
Muslim god, Allah is not a name, but a descriptor that means literally,
"the god". All pagan cultures have these generic terms that refer to
their "top god" as "the god". In comparison to the perfect
monotheism of Judaism and Christianity, "Allah" was originally no
more a proper name for the Muslim God, than the word Hebrew "elohim"
(god) or Greek "theos" (god) are proper names of the one true God of
the Bible. "Jehovah" is the only revealed proper name for the
"Elohim" of the Old Testament ( Ex 3:13; 6:3) and "Jesus"
is the only revealed proper name of "Theos" in the New Testament.
(Acts 4:12) Islam has no proper name for their god, but merely transformed, by
universal use and confusion, the generic Allah into a proper name. So although
today, Muslims use "Allah" as a proper name, it was never used this
way originally. Allah, therefore is equivalent to "elohim" and
"ho theos" but not "Jehovah" or "Jesus". Allah is
not the name of the nameless Muslim God. However Muslims will claim that Allah
is the name of God that corresponds to Jehovah. Both the Father and the Son are
called "ho theos" (The God). Jesus is called "The God" many
times in the New Testament: John 20:28; Heb 1:8. An important conclusion from
this, is that the mere fact that "Allah" is equivalent to
"elohim" and "ho theos" does not mean they are directly
corresponded. It certainly doesn't prove Allah is the same as the God of the
Old or New Testament. It does not prove that Muslim's worship the same God as
Christians. If this correspondence proved the Muslim god was the same as the
Christian God, then because pagan religions also have generics that correspond
to "the god" (Allah), this correspondence would also prove that Allah
is the same god as the Buddhist god, for Buddhists also refer to their god as
"the god".
What scholars say about the
origin of the word "Allah":
1.
It is not related that the Black Stone was connected with any special
god. In the Ka'ba was the statue of the god Hubal who might be called the god
of Mecca and of the Ka'ba. Caetani gives great prominence to the connection
between the Ka'ba and Hubal. Besides him, however, al-Lat, al-`Uzza, and
al-Manat were worshipped and are mentioned in the Kur'an; Hubal is never
mentioned there. What position Allah held beside these is not exactly known.
The Islamic tradition has certainly elevated him at the expense of other
deities. It may be considered certain that the Black Stone was not the only
idol in or at the Ka'ba. The Makam Ibrahim was of course a sacred stone from
very early times. Its name has not been handed down. Beside it several idols
are mentioned, among them the 360 statues. (First Encyclopedia of Islam, E.J. Brill,
1987, Islam, p. 587-591)
2.
"The verses of the Qur'an make it clear that the very name Allah
existed in the Jahiliyya or pre-Islamic Arabia. Certain pagan tribes believed
in a god whom they called 'Allah' and whom they believed to be the creator of
heaven and earth and holder of the highest rank in the hierarchy of the gods.
It is well known that the Quraish as well as other tribes believed in Allah,
whom they designated as the 'Lord of the House' (i.e., of the Ka'ba)...It is
therefore clear that the Qur'anic conception of Allah is not entirely
new." (A Guide to the Contents of the Qur'an,
Faruq Sherif, (Reading, 1995), pgs. 21-22., Muslim)
3.
According to al-Masudi (Murudj, iv. 47), certain people have regarded
the Ka'ba as a temple devoted to the sun, the moon and the five planets. The
36o idols placed round the Ka'ba also point in this direction. It can therefore
hardly be denied that traces exist of an astral symbolism. At the same time one
can safely say that there can be no question of any general conception on these
lines. The cult at the Ka'ba was in the heathen period syncretic as is usual in
heathenism. (First Encyclopedia of Islam, E.J. Brill,
1987, Islam, p. 587-591)
4.
The name Allah, as the Qur'an itself is witness, was well known in
pre-Islamic Arabia. Indeed, both it and its feminine form, Allat, are found not
infrequently among the theophorous names in inscriptions from North Arabia. The
common theory is that it is formed from ilah, the common word for a god, and
the article al-; thus al-ilah, the god," becomes Allah, "God."
This theory, however, is untenable. In fact, the name is one of the words
borrowed into the language in pre-Islamic times from Aramaic. (Islam: Muhammad and His Religion,
Arthur Jeffery, 1958, p 85)
5.
"If a Muslim says, "Your God and our God is the same,"
either he does not understand who Allah and Christ really are, or he
intentionally glosses over the deep-rooted differences." (Who Is Allah In Islam?, Abd-Al
Masih, Light of Life, 1985, p. 36.)
6.
Now there dwelt in Mecca a god called Allah. He was the provider, the
most powerful of all the local deities, the one to whom every Meccan turned in
time of need. But, for all his power, Allah was a remote god. At the time of
Muhammad, however, he was on the ascendancy. He had replaced the moon god as
lord of the Kaaba although still relegated to an inferior position below
various tribal idols and three powerful goddesses: al-Manat, goddess of fate,
al-Lat, mother of the gods, and al-Uzza, the planet Venus. (Islam and the Arabs, Rom Landau,
1958 p 11-21)
… AND MORE with a total of 66 refutations
about the origins of “Allah” - The pagan
origin of the word, "Allah"; Written by Brother Andrew; The
Interactive Bible.
At this point I appreciate the Muslim Apologist going by mohammedbasha
chose not to comment anonymously. But pointing to a website misleading about
the reality of Islam’s animus toward non-Muslims needed to be addressed in a
stand-alone post. AND THERE YOU HAVE IT.
JRH 11/13/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:
Blog Editor: Rather than
capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post
and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship
tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false
accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat
censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you
belong to.
No comments:
Post a Comment