I am a little hampered from doing my typical introductory
duties today due to recovering from cataract surgery and I feel a one-eyed
cyclops, Because of the surgery I am excerpting Justin Smith’s thoughts to the
submission. This also me tugging on potential heartstrings: If anyone would like to donate to my
hospital deductible feel free to avail yourself to either my
paypal button on SlantRight 2.0 blog or to
the link under my
initials
This
submission addresses the recent abortion SCOTUS ruling on June 27th.
The
recent Supreme Court ruling on Texas abortion clinics needs much closer
examination, and by that same token so too does the overall question of
abortion and how We proceed in the future as a moral nation that truly does
value all life.
JRH 7/6/16
***********************
An Unalienable Right
to Life
Sent: 7/6/2016 12:17 PM
By Justin O. Smith
Life has intrinsic value, but pro-abortionists of the Far
Left and the Democratic Party, who have already received their unalienable
God-given right to life, have ignored the rights of the unborn to live since
the 1973 Roe vs Wade Supreme Court decision. They have attempted to desensitize
American society to the murders of nearly 70 million babies, horrifically and
painfully killed by being ripped apart, suctioned, chemically burned and
decapitated, and far too often their agenda has been advanced by Supreme Court
Justices, who have interjected their own political bias into a case rather than
objectively interpret the law, just as America witnessed once more on June
27th, 2016.
The Court's opinion, written by Justice Stephen Breyer,
struck down two safety-directed and medically sound common sense provisions of
Texas law that demanded abortion physicians must have "admitting
privileges" at a hospital within 30 miles of their abortion clinics and
that abortion clinics must meet the standards of an "ambulatory surgical
center." The decision called these provisions an "undue burden"
on a woman's non-existent and phantom "right" to an abortion, which
illustrates how sick and lost America has become, as our courts, many so-called
"leaders" and many citizens define what constitutes life based on
convenience, the height of inhuman evil.
Star Parker, a well-known journalist, observed in
her June 29th article that the requirement for Texas abortion clinics to
meet the standards on an "ambulatory surgical center", a provision
adopted by 20 other states, was a direct response to the Kermit Gosnell case in
Pennsylvania. Gosnell operated a filthy, unregulated clinic for years, and he
was convicted on manslaughter and murder charges stemming from his unsavory,
immoral and incompetent procedures.
Many Americans have a great appreciation for their right to
privacy, but that right does not supersede the right of the unborn to their
lives. The hypothesis advanced in the 1965 Griswold vs Connecticut
decision and the basis for Roe vs Wade was created from thin air and incoherent
logic, pulled straight from the Supreme Court's ass. In similar fashion, the
Court's June 27th decision was pulled from its collective ass, with Justices
Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy and Sonia Sotomayor joining
Breyer in finding within the 14th Amendment and the U.S. Constitution a
"right" unknown to our Founding Fathers, a right that actually
embodies an atrocity that the Founders most certainly would have rejected if it
had come before them.
There is absolutely no mention of anything in the U.S.
Constitution or the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments that remotely
resembles any right to abortion. As such, anything concerning abortion
must fall to the States, because the Tenth Amendment plainly states:
"The powers not delegated to the United Sates by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the people."
Justice Antonin Scalia, a staunch
conservative, provided years of objective service and his adjudication of
cases should serve as a template. Scalia noted in 2009: "I do not believe
that the Constitution requires States to permit abortion, but neither do I
believe it invalidates state laws that permit abortion".
Following the latest trends activated by minority protests
and their own whims, time and again, ignorant high-perched idiots on the
Supreme Court, this council of kings __ court jesters to be more accurate __
have supplanted sound existing laws, proper precedents, referendums and the
will of the people and tradition with perversions of the law, as viewed through
the lens of Obamacare, "gay" [same-sex] marriage and religious
liberty. They make law rather than interpret law objectively, and in the
process, they betray America and trample on the critical ingredient of our
democratic constitutional republic __ our Liberty.
Thomas Jefferson, a lawyer and our third U.S. President,
foresaw this day, stating: "... the germ of dissolution of our
federal government is in the constitution of the judiciary; an irresponsible
body ... advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of the
jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the states ... [It] will become
as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."
While one ponders all of this, bear in mind that Margaret
Sanger's Negro Project, the fountainhead of Planned Parenthood, started as
a eugenics plan to contain the "inferior" races through birth
control, sterilization and abortion, a plan to make certain only the most
"fit" were allowed to be born. And, as Rev. Jesse Peterson observes
in 'From Rage to Responsibility', Sanger never intended for abortion to be
widespread in the white population; she viewed abortion as a method for
improving the population by convincing poor minorities to murder their unborn
babies.
Since 1939 abortion on demand has been a part of the Far
Left's vision for America and the Democratic Party's platform. In fact,
abortion as birth control is implicit in the Democratic Party's platform for
2016 and beyond, and they are demanding the revocation of all restrictions on abortion,
including the gruesome partial-birth abortions in which late-term babies are
murdered as they exit the birth canal.
On June 27th, Hillary Clinton tweeted: "Women
won't be 'punished' for exercising their basic rights," suggesting that
babies are a form of punishment rather than a gift from God, unless the mother
decides she wants the baby. But packaging abortion as "a woman's right to
choose" ignores the rights of the father and the rights of the unborn
child.
Abortion is the murder of a human child, and it should be
illegal.
America's Founding Fathers articulated one's right to life
in the Declaration of Independence, in such a manner that the right to life is
known and recognized to be fundamental to the unalienable God-given rights our
Constitution was designed to protect; and, since life begins at conception,
each individual human life has an unalienable right to life from its earliest
beginning. This is especially true once the unborn baby can survive outside the
womb, and as such, even in the womb, these babies are deserving of "due
process" and "equal protection" under the law, as provided under
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Unmask the horror of abortion and reveal the beauty and
worth of those little persons residing in millions of wombs across America, our
fellow human beings, in every definition of the word "person" __
Little perfectly formed human babies. Negate and nullify the abortionists'
claim to constitutional primacy, with the certainty that these little human beings'
unalienable rights come from God by virtue of the fact that all humans are
created in His image, imbued with a unique dignity and worth not found in the
rest of creation, and move America to once again see abortion as grossly
immoral, barbaric and criminal, just as America viewed it centuries before this
generation.
End this abominable practice by advancing the standard that
"these truths" are "self-evident" throughout States'
constitutions and Congressional mandates, while dismissing and refusing to obey
the Supreme Court's edicts that are based on pretexts and ill-conceived logic
and that are contrary to American principles that value life and liberty.
By Justin O. Smith
_______________________
Spellcheck Editing courtesy Microsoft Word.
© Justin O. Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment